Appeal Proceedings Before the Commission, 4366-4368 [2013-00941]

Download as PDF 4366 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: ADDRESSES: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ rules/proposed.shtml); • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number S7–08–12 on the subject line; or • Use the Federal eRulemaking Portal (http://www.regulations.gov). Follow the instructions for submitting comments. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number S7–08–12. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help us process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed). Comments will also be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. All comments received will be posted without change; we do not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information you wish to make available publicly. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael A. Macchiaroli, Associate Director, at (202) 551–5525; Thomas K. McGowan, Deputy Associate Director, at (202) 551–5521; Randall W. Roy, Assistant Director, at (202) 551–5522; Mark M. Attar, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–5889; Sheila Dombal Swartz, Special Counsel, at (202) 551–5545; Valentina M. Deng, Attorney, at (202) 551–5778; or Teen I. Sheng, Attorney, at 202–551–5511, Division of Trading and Markets, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–7010. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 23, 2012, the Commission issued Release No. 34–68071 soliciting comment on proposed rules and rule amendments establishing capital, margin, and segregation requirements for persons who register with the Commission as security-based swap dealers or major security-based swap participants and amending capital VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:29 Jan 18, 2013 Jkt 229001 requirements for broker-dealers.1 The Commission originally requested that comments on this proposal be received by January 22, 2013. The Commission has recently been requested to extend the comment period and believes that extending the comment period is appropriate in order to give the public additional time to comment on the matters addressed by the release.2 This extension will allow for 91 days of comment which the Commission believes should provide the public with sufficient additional time to consider thoroughly the matters addressed by the release and to submit comprehensive responses to the release which would benefit the Commission in its consideration of the final rules. Therefore, the Commission is extending the public comment period for 31 days until Friday, February 22, 2013. Dated: January 15, 2013. By the Commission. Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary. however, please note that comments sent by electronic mail are strongly encouraged. D Email comments to: reg.review@nigc.gov. D Mail comments to: Armando Acosta, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005. D Hand deliver comments to: 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005. D Fax comments to: Armando Acosta, National Indian Gaming Commission, at (202) 632–0045. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Armando Acosta, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005. Email: armando_acosta@nigc.gov; telephone: (202) 632–7003. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Comments Invited [FR Doc. 2013–01053 Filed 1–18–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Indian Gaming Commission Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposed rules. 25 CFR Parts 581, 584, and 585 II. Background Appeal Proceedings Before the Commission The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA or Act), Public Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., was signed into law on October 17, 1988. The Act established the Commission and set out a comprehensive framework for the regulation of gaming on Indian lands. The Act requires that the Commission, by regulation, provide an opportunity for an appeal and a hearing before the Commission on fines levied by the Chair against the tribal operator of an Indian game or a management contractor, and to determine whether a temporary closure order issued by the Chair should be made permanent or dissolved. 25 U.S.C. 2713(a)(2), 2713(b). By regulation, the Commission has also provided rights to tribes and/or management contractors to appeal ordinance disapprovals, management contract approvals or disapprovals, enforcement actions, and actions to void an approved management contract. The appellate procedures for these actions are all consolidated in this subchapter. On September 21, 2012, the Commission published two final rules amending 25 CFR parts 543 and 547. In its final rule for part 543, the Commission provided tribal gaming regulatory authorities (TGRA) with National Indian Gaming Commission. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: The National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC or Commission) proposes to revise its appeals rules to include, amongst the appealable actions, the Chair’s decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards. DATES: The agency must receive comments on or before February 6, 2013. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any one of the following methods, SUMMARY: 1 See Exchange Act Release No. 68071 (Oct. 18, 2012), 77 FR 70213 (Nov. 23, 2012). 2 See Letter from Kenneth E. Bentson, Jr., Public Policy and Advocacy Executive Vice President, SIFMA, to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, dated Jan. 3, 2013; see also Letter from Richard M. Whiting, Executive Director and General Counsel, Financial Services Roundtable, to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, dated Jan. 2, 2013. PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM 22JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules rights to appeal the Chair’s decisions to approve or object to a TGRA’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards contained in part 543 (77 FR 58708, Sept. 21, 2012). In its final rule for part 547, the Commission provided TGRAs with rights to appeal the Chair’s decisions to approve or object to a TGRA’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s technical standards contained in part 547 (77 FR 58473, Sept. 21, 2012). III. Development of the Proposed Rule On September 25, 2012, the Commission published a final rule consolidating all appeal proceedings before the Commission into the current subchapter H (Appeal Proceedings Before the Commission). 77 FR 58941, Sept. 25, 2012. However, the new appeal rights provided under parts 543 and 547 were not included in the current subchapter H. Thus, subchapter H must be revised to include the new appeal rights provided to TGRAs under parts 543 and 547. Regulatory Matters Regulatory Flexibility Act The rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. Moreover, Indian Tribes are not considered to be small entities for the purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act The rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. The rule does not have an effect on the economy of $100 million or more. The rule will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, local government agencies or geographic regions. Nor will the rule have a significant adverse effect on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of the enterprises, to compete with foreign based enterprises. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Commission, as an independent regulatory agency, is exempt from compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502(1); 2 U.S.C. 658(1). Takings In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the Commission has determined VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:29 Jan 18, 2013 Jkt 229001 that the rule does not have significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment is not required. Civil Justice Reform In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Commission has determined that the rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order. National Environmental Policy Act The Commission has determined that the rule does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and that no detailed statement is required pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq. Paperwork Reduction Act This proposed rule does not require information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., and is therefore not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. Text of the Proposed Rules For the reasons discussed in the Preamble, the Commission proposes to amend its regulations in 25 CFR chapter III, subchapter H as follows: SUBCHAPTER H—APPEAL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION PART 581—MOTIONS IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION 1. The authority citation for part 581 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2706, 2713, 2715. 2. In § 581.1, the introductory text of paragraph (a) is republished and paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4) are revised to read as follows: ■ § 581.1 What is the scope of this part? (a) This part governs motion practice under: * * * * * (3) Part 584 of this subchapter relating to appeals before a presiding official of notices of violation, orders of temporary closure, proposed civil fine assessments, the Chair’s decisions to void or modify management contracts, the Commission’s proposals to remove certificates of self-regulation, the Chair’s decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards, and notices of late fees and late fee assessments; and PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 4367 (4) Part 585 of this subchapter relating to appeals to the Commission on written submissions of notices of violation, orders of temporary closure, proposed civil fine assessments, the Chair’s decisions to void or modify management contracts, the Commission’s proposals to remove certificates of self-regulation, the Chair’s decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards, and notices of late fees and late fee assessments. * * * * * ■ 3. Revise § 581.4 to read as follows: § 581.4 How do I file a motion before a presiding official? Motion practice before a presiding official on appeals of notices of violation, orders of temporary closure, proposed civil fine assessments, the Chair’s decisions to void or modify management contracts, the Commission’s proposals to remove certificates of self-regulation, the Chair’s decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards, and notices of late fees and late fee assessments is governed by § 584.4 of this subchapter. PART 584—APPEALS BEFORE A PRESIDING OFFICIAL OF NOTICES OF VIOLATION, PROPOSED CIVIL FINE ASSESSMENTS, ORDERS OF TEMPORARY CLOSURE, THE CHAIR’S DECISIONS TO VOID OR MODIFY MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS, THE COMMISSION’S PROPOSALS TO REMOVE A CERTIFICATE OF SELF– REGULATION, THE CHAIR’S DECISIONS TO APPROVE OR OBJECT TO THE ADOPTION OF ALTERNATE STANDARDS FROM THOSE REQUIRED BY THE COMMISSION’S MINIMUM INTERNAL CONTROL STANDARDS AND/OR TECHNICAL STANDARDS, AND NOTICES OF LATE FEES AND LATE FEE ASSESSMENTS 4. The authority citation for part 584 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2706, 2710, 2711, 2712, 2713, 2715, 2717. 5. Revise the part heading to part 584 to read as set forth above. ■ 6. In § 584.1, the introductory text of paragraph (a) is republished. Redesignate paragraph (a)(6) as paragraph (a)(8) and add new paragraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7) to read as follows: ■ E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM 22JAP1 4368 § 584.1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules What does this part cover? (a) This part applies to appeals of the following where the appellant elects a hearing before a presiding official: * * * * * (6) The Chair’s decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards under part 543 of this chapter; (7) The Chair’s decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s technical standards under part 547 of this chapter; and * * * * * ■ 7. Amend § 584.2 to add new paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 584.2 * * * * (c) Appeals of the Chair’s decisions to approve or object to the adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards may only be brought by the tribal gaming regulatory authority that approved the alternate standards for the gaming operation(s). ■ 8. Revise the section heading to § 584.3 to read as follows: § 584.3 How do I appeal a notice of violation, proposed civil fine assessment, order of temporary closure, the Chair’s decision to void or modify a management contract, the Commission’s proposal to remove a certificate of self-regulation, the Chair’s decision to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards, and a notice of late fees and late fee assessments? * * * 9. The authority citation for part 585 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2706, 2710, 2711, 2712, 2713, 2715, 2717. 10. Revise the part heading to part 585 to read as set forth above. ■ 11. In § 585.1, the introductory text of paragraph (a) is republished. Redesignate paragraph (a)(6) as paragraph (a)(8) and add new paragraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7) to read as follows: * § 585.1 What does this part cover? (a) This part applies to appeals of the following where the appellant does not elect a hearing before a presiding official and instead elects to have the matter decided by the Commission solely on the basis of the written submissions: * * * * * (6) The Chair’s decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards under part 543 of this chapter; (7) The Chair’s decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s technical standards under part 547 of this chapter; and * * * * * ■ 12. Amend § 585.2 to add new paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 585.2 Who may appeal? tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with * * * * * (c) Appeals of the Chair’s decisions to approve or object to the adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards may only be brought by the tribal gaming regulatory authority that approved the alternate standards for the gaming operation(s). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:29 Jan 18, 2013 13. Revise the section heading to § 585.3 to read as follows: ■ § 585.3 How do I appeal a notice of violation, proposed civil fine assessment, order of temporary closure, the Chair’s decision to void or modify a management contract, the Commission’s proposal to remove a certificate of self regulation, the Chair’s decision to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority’s adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission’s minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards, and notices of late fees and late fee assessments? * * * * * Dated: January 14, 2013. Tracie L. Stevens, Chairwoman. Daniel J. Little, Associate Commissioner. [FR Doc. 2013–00941 Filed 1–18–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P ■ Who may appeal? * * PART 585—APPEALS TO THE COMMISSION ON WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF NOTICES OF VIOLATION, PROPOSED CIVIL FINE ASSESSMENTS, ORDERS OF TEMPORARY CLOSURE, THE CHAIR’S DECISIONS TO VOID OR MODIFY MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS, THE COMMISSION’S PROPOSALS TO REMOVE A CERTIFICATE OF SELF– REGULATION, THE CHAIR’S DECISIONS TO APPROVE OR OBJECT TO THE ADOPTION OF ALTERNATE STANDARDS FROM THOSE REQUIRED BY THE COMMISSION’S MINIMUM INTERNAL CONTROL STANDARDS AND/OR TECHNICAL STANDARDS, AND NOTICES OF LATE FEES AND LATE FEE ASSESSMENTS Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0784; FRL–9770–3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Requirements for Determining General Conformity of Federal Actions to Applicable State Implementation Plans Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of West Virginia for the purpose of amending the State’s prior general conformity rule to incorporate the most recent changes to Federal general conformity requirements established under rules promulgated by the EPA in July of 2006 and in April of 2010. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State’s SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because EPA views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rulemaking action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM 22JAP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 22, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4366-4368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00941]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Indian Gaming Commission

25 CFR Parts 581, 584, and 585


Appeal Proceedings Before the Commission

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC or Commission) 
proposes to revise its appeals rules to include, amongst the appealable 
actions, the Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming 
regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those 
required by the Commission's minimum internal control standards and/or 
technical standards.

DATES: The agency must receive comments on or before February 6, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any one of the following methods, 
however, please note that comments sent by electronic mail are strongly 
encouraged.
    [ssquf] Email comments to: reg.review@nigc.gov.
    [ssquf] Mail comments to: Armando Acosta, National Indian Gaming 
Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005.
    [ssquf] Hand deliver comments to: 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100, 
Washington, DC 20005.
    [ssquf] Fax comments to: Armando Acosta, National Indian Gaming 
Commission, at (202) 632-0045.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Armando Acosta, National Indian Gaming 
Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005. Email: 
armando_acosta@nigc.gov; telephone: (202) 632-7003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed 
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they 
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the 
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing 
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposed rules.

II. Background

    The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA or Act), Public Law 100-497, 
25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., was signed into law on October 17, 1988. The 
Act established the Commission and set out a comprehensive framework 
for the regulation of gaming on Indian lands. The Act requires that the 
Commission, by regulation, provide an opportunity for an appeal and a 
hearing before the Commission on fines levied by the Chair against the 
tribal operator of an Indian game or a management contractor, and to 
determine whether a temporary closure order issued by the Chair should 
be made permanent or dissolved. 25 U.S.C. 2713(a)(2), 2713(b). By 
regulation, the Commission has also provided rights to tribes and/or 
management contractors to appeal ordinance disapprovals, management 
contract approvals or disapprovals, enforcement actions, and actions to 
void an approved management contract. The appellate procedures for 
these actions are all consolidated in this subchapter.
    On September 21, 2012, the Commission published two final rules 
amending 25 CFR parts 543 and 547. In its final rule for part 543, the 
Commission provided tribal gaming regulatory authorities (TGRA) with

[[Page 4367]]

rights to appeal the Chair's decisions to approve or object to a TGRA's 
adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission's 
minimum internal control standards contained in part 543 (77 FR 58708, 
Sept. 21, 2012). In its final rule for part 547, the Commission 
provided TGRAs with rights to appeal the Chair's decisions to approve 
or object to a TGRA's adoption of alternate standards from those 
required by the Commission's technical standards contained in part 547 
(77 FR 58473, Sept. 21, 2012).

III. Development of the Proposed Rule

    On September 25, 2012, the Commission published a final rule 
consolidating all appeal proceedings before the Commission into the 
current subchapter H (Appeal Proceedings Before the Commission). 77 FR 
58941, Sept. 25, 2012. However, the new appeal rights provided under 
parts 543 and 547 were not included in the current subchapter H. Thus, 
subchapter H must be revised to include the new appeal rights provided 
to TGRAs under parts 543 and 547.

Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number 
of small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 
U.S.C. 601, et seq. Moreover, Indian Tribes are not considered to be 
small entities for the purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    The rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. The rule does not have an 
effect on the economy of $100 million or more. The rule will not cause 
a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual 
industries, Federal, State, local government agencies or geographic 
regions. Nor will the rule have a significant adverse effect on 
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the 
ability of the enterprises, to compete with foreign based enterprises.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Commission, as an independent regulatory agency, is exempt from 
compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502(1); 2 
U.S.C. 658(1).

Takings

    In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the Commission has 
determined that the rule does not have significant takings 
implications. A takings implication assessment is not required.

Civil Justice Reform

    In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Commission has 
determined that the rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and 
meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.

National Environmental Policy Act

    The Commission has determined that the rule does not constitute a 
major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment and that no detailed statement is required pursuant to the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This proposed rule does not require information collection under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., and is 
therefore not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.

Text of the Proposed Rules

    For the reasons discussed in the Preamble, the Commission proposes 
to amend its regulations in 25 CFR chapter III, subchapter H as 
follows:

SUBCHAPTER H--APPEAL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

PART 581--MOTIONS IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

0
1. The authority citation for part 581 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  25 U.S.C. 2706, 2713, 2715.

0
2. In Sec.  581.1, the introductory text of paragraph (a) is 
republished and paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4) are revised to read as 
follows:


Sec.  581.1  What is the scope of this part?

    (a) This part governs motion practice under:
* * * * *
    (3) Part 584 of this subchapter relating to appeals before a 
presiding official of notices of violation, orders of temporary 
closure, proposed civil fine assessments, the Chair's decisions to void 
or modify management contracts, the Commission's proposals to remove 
certificates of self-regulation, the Chair's decisions to approve or 
object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority's adoption of alternate 
standards from those required by the Commission's minimum internal 
control standards and/or technical standards, and notices of late fees 
and late fee assessments; and
    (4) Part 585 of this subchapter relating to appeals to the 
Commission on written submissions of notices of violation, orders of 
temporary closure, proposed civil fine assessments, the Chair's 
decisions to void or modify management contracts, the Commission's 
proposals to remove certificates of self-regulation, the Chair's 
decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming regulatory 
authority's adoption of alternate standards from those required by the 
Commission's minimum internal control standards and/or technical 
standards, and notices of late fees and late fee assessments.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Sec.  581.4 to read as follows:


Sec.  581.4  How do I file a motion before a presiding official?

    Motion practice before a presiding official on appeals of notices 
of violation, orders of temporary closure, proposed civil fine 
assessments, the Chair's decisions to void or modify management 
contracts, the Commission's proposals to remove certificates of self-
regulation, the Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal 
gaming regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from 
those required by the Commission's minimum internal control standards 
and/or technical standards, and notices of late fees and late fee 
assessments is governed by Sec.  584.4 of this subchapter.

PART 584--APPEALS BEFORE A PRESIDING OFFICIAL OF NOTICES OF 
VIOLATION, PROPOSED CIVIL FINE ASSESSMENTS, ORDERS OF TEMPORARY 
CLOSURE, THE CHAIR'S DECISIONS TO VOID OR MODIFY MANAGEMENT 
CONTRACTS, THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSALS TO REMOVE A CERTIFICATE OF 
SELF-REGULATION, THE CHAIR'S DECISIONS TO APPROVE OR OBJECT TO THE 
ADOPTION OF ALTERNATE STANDARDS FROM THOSE REQUIRED BY THE 
COMMISSION'S MINIMUM INTERNAL CONTROL STANDARDS AND/OR TECHNICAL 
STANDARDS, AND NOTICES OF LATE FEES AND LATE FEE ASSESSMENTS

0
4. The authority citation for part 584 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2706, 2710, 2711, 2712, 2713, 2715, 2717.

0
5. Revise the part heading to part 584 to read as set forth above.
0
6. In Sec.  584.1, the introductory text of paragraph (a) is 
republished. Redesignate paragraph (a)(6) as paragraph (a)(8) and add 
new paragraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7) to read as follows:

[[Page 4368]]

Sec.  584.1  What does this part cover?

    (a) This part applies to appeals of the following where the 
appellant elects a hearing before a presiding official:
* * * * *
    (6) The Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming 
regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those 
required by the Commission's minimum internal control standards under 
part 543 of this chapter;
    (7) The Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming 
regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those 
required by the Commission's technical standards under part 547 of this 
chapter; and
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec.  584.2 to add new paragraph (c) to read as follows:


Sec.  584.2  Who may appeal?

* * * * *
    (c) Appeals of the Chair's decisions to approve or object to the 
adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission's 
minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards may only 
be brought by the tribal gaming regulatory authority that approved the 
alternate standards for the gaming operation(s).
0
8. Revise the section heading to Sec.  584.3 to read as follows:


Sec.  584.3  How do I appeal a notice of violation, proposed civil fine 
assessment, order of temporary closure, the Chair's decision to void or 
modify a management contract, the Commission's proposal to remove a 
certificate of self-regulation, the Chair's decision to approve or 
object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority's adoption of alternate 
standards from those required by the Commission's minimum internal 
control standards and/or technical standards, and a notice of late fees 
and late fee assessments?

* * * * *

PART 585--APPEALS TO THE COMMISSION ON WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF 
NOTICES OF VIOLATION, PROPOSED CIVIL FINE ASSESSMENTS, ORDERS OF 
TEMPORARY CLOSURE, THE CHAIR'S DECISIONS TO VOID OR MODIFY 
MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS, THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSALS TO REMOVE A 
CERTIFICATE OF SELF-REGULATION, THE CHAIR'S DECISIONS TO APPROVE OR 
OBJECT TO THE ADOPTION OF ALTERNATE STANDARDS FROM THOSE REQUIRED 
BY THE COMMISSION'S MINIMUM INTERNAL CONTROL STANDARDS AND/OR 
TECHNICAL STANDARDS, AND NOTICES OF LATE FEES AND LATE FEE 
ASSESSMENTS

0
9. The authority citation for part 585 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2706, 2710, 2711, 2712, 2713, 2715, 2717.

0
10. Revise the part heading to part 585 to read as set forth above.
0
11. In Sec.  585.1, the introductory text of paragraph (a) is 
republished. Redesignate paragraph (a)(6) as paragraph (a)(8) and add 
new paragraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7) to read as follows:


Sec.  585.1  What does this part cover?

    (a) This part applies to appeals of the following where the 
appellant does not elect a hearing before a presiding official and 
instead elects to have the matter decided by the Commission solely on 
the basis of the written submissions:
* * * * *
    (6) The Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming 
regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those 
required by the Commission's minimum internal control standards under 
part 543 of this chapter;
    (7) The Chair's decisions to approve or object to a tribal gaming 
regulatory authority's adoption of alternate standards from those 
required by the Commission's technical standards under part 547 of this 
chapter; and
* * * * *
0
12. Amend Sec.  585.2 to add new paragraph (c) to read as follows:


Sec.  585.2  Who may appeal?

* * * * *
    (c) Appeals of the Chair's decisions to approve or object to the 
adoption of alternate standards from those required by the Commission's 
minimum internal control standards and/or technical standards may only 
be brought by the tribal gaming regulatory authority that approved the 
alternate standards for the gaming operation(s).
0
13. Revise the section heading to Sec.  585.3 to read as follows:


Sec.  585.3  How do I appeal a notice of violation, proposed civil fine 
assessment, order of temporary closure, the Chair's decision to void or 
modify a management contract, the Commission's proposal to remove a 
certificate of self regulation, the Chair's decision to approve or 
object to a tribal gaming regulatory authority's adoption of alternate 
standards from those required by the Commission's minimum internal 
control standards and/or technical standards, and notices of late fees 
and late fee assessments?

* * * * *

    Dated: January 14, 2013.
Tracie L. Stevens,
Chairwoman.
Daniel J. Little,
Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2013-00941 Filed 1-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P