Inflation Adjustment of Civil Money Penalty Amounts, 4057-4060 [2013-01070]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
FAA–2012–0987; Directorate Identifier
2012–NM–130–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective February 22, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 737–300, –400, and –500 series
airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–23–1302, dated August
24, 2009; and Model 757–200 series
airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 757–23–0107, Revision 1,
dated May 16, 2012.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 23, Communications.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of
damage caused by electrical arcing to the
wires that connect seat electronics boxes. We
are issuing this AD to prevent power from
being supplied to passenger seats when the
entertainment control switch is in the OFF
position, which could cause an electrical
shock hazard resulting in serious or fatal
injury to maintenance personnel.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with
(g) Installation of New Relay and Wiring
Bundle Change
Within 24 months after the effective date
of this AD: Change the wire bundle route,
and install a new relay and applicable wiring
of the entertainment control switch, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the service information
specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this
AD, as applicable.
(1) For Model 737–300, -400, and -500
series airplanes: Use Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–23–1302,
dated August 24, 2009.
(2) For Model 757–200 series airplanes:
Use Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 757–23–0107, Revision 1, dated May
16, 2012.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:08 Jan 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(i) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Binh Tran, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; phone: 425–917–6485; fax: 425–917–
6590; email: binh.tran@faa.gov.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–23–1302, dated August 24,
2009.
(ii) Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 757–23–0107, Revision 1, dated May
16, 2012.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
4, 2013.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–00563 Filed 1–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 28, 30, and 180
[Docket No. FR–5662–F–01]
RIN 2501–AD59
Inflation Adjustment of Civil Money
Penalty Amounts
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule amends HUD’s
civil money penalty and civil penalty
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4057
regulations by making inflation
adjustments that are required by the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461
note) (FCPIA Act). The FCPIA Act
mandates the adjustments and the
formula used to calculate them. Also in
this final rule, HUD is taking the
opportunity to update an outdated
cross-reference in its civil money
penalty regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: February 19,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dane Narode, Associate General
Counsel, Office of Program
Enforcement, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 1250
Maryland Avenue SW., Suite 200,
Washington, DC 20024; telephone
number 202–245–4141 (this is not a tollfree number). Hearing- or speechimpaired individuals may access this
number via TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461
note) (FCPIA Act), as amended by the
Debt Collection Improvement Act of
1996 (31 U.S.C. 3701) (DCIA), requires
each federal agency to make inflation
adjustments to its maximum civil
money penalties and civil penalties. The
formula for determining the specific
adjustment of such penalties for
inflation is nondiscretionary and is
determined by section 5 of the FCPIA
Act. The adjustment is based on the
change in the cost-of-living increase,
which is defined in the statute as based
on the percentage change, if any, in the
Consumer Price Index (CPI). The statute
also states specific rules for rounding
off, first-time adjustments and provides
that adjusted civil money penalties and
civil penalties can only be applied
prospectively; that is, only to violations
that occur after the date that the
increase takes effect.
II. This Final Rule
A. Inflation Adjustment of Civil Money
Penalty and Civil Penalty Amounts
The changes made by this final rule
increase the amount of civil money
penalties, consistent with statutory
authority for 24 CFR parts 28 and 30
and civil penalties consistent with 24
CFR part 180. Additionally, no
amendment is necessary to civil money
penalties and civil penalties found in
some HUD regulations (e.g., 24 CFR
parts 30.20, 30.25, and 180.671(a)(1))
because application of the statute’s
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with
4058
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
formula would not result in an increase
to the penalty.
Applying the statutory formula to
determine the amount of the adjustment
is a four-step process. The first step
entails determining the inflation
adjustment factor. This is done by
calculating the percentage increase by
which the CPI for all urban consumers
(CPI–U) for the month of June of the
calendar year preceding the adjustment
(i.e., June 2012) exceeds the CPI–U for
the month of June of the calendar year
in which the amount of such civil
monetary penalty was last set or
adjusted. CPI–U values are available at
a Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics file transfer protocol site,
ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/
cpi/cpiai.txt. Once the inflation
adjustment factor is determined, the
second step is to calculate the inflation
increase. That is done by multiplying
the inflation adjustment factor by the
current civil penalty amount. The third
step is to round off the inflation increase
according to Section 5(a) of the FCPIA
Act, as amended by the DCIA. The
FCPIA Act provides for a ‘‘roundingoff,’’ using multiples from $10 to
$25,000, of the increase calculated
based on the change in the CPI. See 28
U.S.C. 2461(5)(a). Once the inflation
increase has been rounded, the last step
is to add the rounded inflation increase
to the current civil penalty amount, to
obtain the new inflation-adjusted civil
penalty amount. Consequently, in those
instances in which the increased dollar
amount is determined to be less than the
applicable multiple, the existing penalty
is unchanged. The first time the civil
penalty amount is adjusted, the FCPIA
Act limits any increase of the civil
penalty to no more than 10 percent.
In § 28.10, the maximum penalties for
making a false claim or written
statement, as described in the
regulation, is increased from $7,500 to
$8,500.
In § 30.35(c)(1), the maximum
penalties that the Mortgagee Review
Board may impose for a series of
violations identified in the regulations
are increased from $7,500 to $8,500 per
violation, and from $1,375,000 to
$1,525,000 for all violations committed
during any one-year period.
In § 30.36(c), the maximum penalty
that HUD may impose upon participants
in Federal Housing Administration
(FHA) programs for violations identified
in the regulation is increased from
$6,050 to $7,050, and from $1,210,000
to a maximum of $1,335,000 for all
violations committed during any oneyear period.
In § 30.40(c), the maximum penalty
that HUD may impose upon a mortgagee
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:08 Jan 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
or a holder of a guarantee certificate that
violates the statutory provisions
concerning loan guarantees for Indian
housing is increased from $7,000 to
$8,000 per violation, and from
$1,375,000 to a maximum of $1,525,000
for all violations committed during any
one-year period.
In § 30.45(g), the maximum penalty
that may be imposed upon a mortgagor
of a multifamily property or upon any
person in a relationship with the
mortgagor, as described in the
regulations, is increased from $37,500 to
$42,500 per violation.
In § 30.50(c), the maximum penalty
that may be imposed against a
Government National Mortgage
Association (GNMA) issuer or custodian
for a violation of any provision of 12
U.S.C. 1723i(b) or other authorities cited
in the regulations is increased from
$7,500 to $8,500 per violation, and from
$1,375,000 to $1,525,000 for all
violations committed during any oneyear period.
In § 30.60(c), the maximum penalty
that HUD may impose upon any dealer
or sponsored third-party originator for,
among other things, falsifying
statements or making false
representations in violation of section
2(b)(7) of the National Housing Act (12
U.S.C. 1703(b)(7)) is increased from
$7,500 to $8,500 for each violation, and
from $1,375,000 to a maximum of
$1,525,000 during any one-year period.
In § 30.68(c), the maximum penalty
that may be imposed against any owner,
any general partner of a partnership
owner, or any agent, as described in the
regulation, that provides a knowing and
material breach of a housing assistance
payments contract, is increased from
$25,000 to $27,500 per violation.
In § 180.671(a)(2) and (3), the
maximum penalties that the
Administrative Law Judge may impose
upon a respondent who is found to have
engaged in a discriminatory housing
practice is increased from $37,500 to
$42,500, and from $65,000 to $70,000,
respectively. The maximum penalty of
$16,000 at § 180.671(a)(1) does not
increase under the formula.
B. Correction to 24 CFR 30.90
On December 17, 2008, HUD
published a final rule (73 FR 76832) to
amend its regulations governing hearing
procedures for administrative sanction
hearings pursuant to 2 CFR part 2424
and with respect to determinations by
the Multifamily Participation Review
Committee pursuant to 24 CFR part 200,
subpart H. The final rule replaced and
reorganized Part 26. As a result, the
cross-references to Part 26 in § 30.90 are
outdated. This final rule takes the
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
opportunity to correct that by updating
the cross-references in § 30.90(c).
III. Justification for Final Rulemaking
In general, HUD publishes a rule for
public comment before issuing a rule for
effect, in accordance with HUD’s
regulations on rulemaking at 24 CFR
part 10. Part 10, however, provides in
§ 10.1 for exceptions from that general
rule where HUD finds good cause to
omit advance notice and public
participation. The good cause
requirement is satisfied when the prior
public procedure is ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest.’’
HUD finds that good cause exists to
publish this rule for effect without first
soliciting public comment because prior
public comment is unnecessary. This
final rule merely follows the statutory
directive in the FCPIA Act allowing for
periodic increases in HUD’s civil money
penalties and civil penalties by applying
the adjustment formula established in
the statute. Accordingly, because
calculation of the increases is formuladriven, HUD has no discretion in
updating its regulations to reflect the
maximum allowable penalties derived
from application of the formula. HUD
emphasizes that this rule addresses only
the matter of the calculation of the
maximum civil money penalties or civil
penalties for the respective violations
described in the regulations. This rule
does not address the issue of the
Secretary’s discretion to impose or not
to impose a penalty, nor the procedures
that HUD must follow in initiating a
civil money penalty action, or in
seeking a civil penalty in a Fair Housing
Act case.
IV. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review—Executive Orders
12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if the regulation is
necessary, to select the regulatory
approach that maximizes net benefits.
As discussed above in this preamble,
this final rule updates an incorrect cross
reference and revises the civil money
penalty and civil penalty regulations to
make inflation adjustments required by
the FCPIA Act. As a result, this rule was
determined to be not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and therefore was
not reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)) generally requires an
agency to conduct regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements,
unless the agency certifies that the rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This final rule has no economic
impact on entities that are in
compliance with relevant laws and HUD
regulations. This final rule does not
establish special procedures that would
need to be complied with by small
entities. All entities, small or large,
could be subject to the same penalties
as established by statute and
implemented by this rule, but only if
they violate a relevant statute or
regulation and become subject to civil
money penalties or civil penalties.
Accordingly, the undersigned certifies
that this final rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments and is not
required by statute, or the rule preempts
state law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This
final rule will not have federalism
implications and would not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments or preempt
state law within the meaning of the
Executive Order.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with
Environmental Review
This rule does not direct, provide for
assistance or loan and mortgage
insurance for, or otherwise govern, or
regulate, real property acquisition,
disposition, leasing, rehabilitation,
alteration, demolition, or new
construction, or establish, revise, or
provide for standards for construction or
construction materials, manufactured
housing, or occupancy. Accordingly,
under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this rule is
categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements
for federal agencies to assess the effects
of their regulatory actions on state,
local, and tribal governments, and the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:08 Jan 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
private sector. This rule does not
impose any federal mandates on any
state, local, or tribal government, or the
private sector within the meaning of
UMRA.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 28
4059
(c)(1) Amount of penalty. The
maximum penalty is $8,500 for each
violation, up to a limit of $1,525,000 for
all violations committed during any
one-year period. Each violation shall
constitute a separate violation as to each
mortgage or loan application.
*
*
*
*
*
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Fraud, Penalties.
■
24 CFR Part 30
§ 30.36 Other participants in FHA
programs.
Administrative practice and
procedure, Grant programs—housing
and community development, Loan
programs—housing and community
development, Mortgages, Penalties.
24 CFR Part 180
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Civil rights, Fair
housing, Individuals with disabilities,
Investigations, Mortgages, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons described
in the preamble, HUD amends 24 CFR
parts 28, 30, and 180 to read as follows:
PART 28—IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES
ACT OF 1986
1. The authority citation for part 28 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note; 31 U.S.C.
3801–3812; 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
2. Revise § 28.10 (a)(1) introductory
text and (b)(1) introductory text to read
as follows:
■
§ 28.10 Basis for civil penalties and
assessments.
(a) Claims. (1) A civil penalty of not
more than $8,500 may be imposed upon
a person who makes a claim that the
person knows or has reason to know:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Statements. (1) A civil penalty of
up to $8,500 may be imposed upon a
person who makes a written statement
that:
*
*
*
*
*
PART 30—CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES:
CERTAIN PROHIBITED CONDUCT
3. The authority citation for part 30
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1701q–1, 1703, 1723i,
1735f–14, 1735f–15; 15 U.S.C. 1717a; 28
U.S.C. 2461 note; 42 U.S.C. 1437z–1 and
3535(d).
5. Revise § 30.36(c) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Amount of penalty. The maximum
penalty is $7,050 for each violation, up
to a limit of $1,335,000 for all violations
committed during any one-year period.
Each violation shall constitute a
separate violation as to each mortgage or
loan application.
■
6. Revise § 30.40(c) to read as follows:
§ 30.40 Loan guarantees for Indian
housing.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Amount of penalty. The maximum
penalty is $8,000 for each violation, up
to a limit of $1,525,000 for all violations
committed during any one-year period.
Each violation shall constitute a
separate violation as to each mortgage or
loan application.
■
7. Revise § 30.45(g) to read as follows:
§ 30.45 Multifamily and Section 202 or 811
mortgagors.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Maximum penalty. The maximum
penalty for each violation under
paragraphs (c) and (f) of this section is
$42,500.
*
*
*
*
*
■
8. Revise § 30.50(c) to read as follows:
§ 30.50
GNMA issuers and custodians.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Amount of penalty. The maximum
penalty is $8,500 for each violation, up
to a limit of $1,525,000 during any oneyear period. Each violation shall
constitute a separate violation with
respect to each pool of mortgages.
■
9. Revise § 30.60(c) to read as follows:
§ 30.60 Dealers or sponsored third-party
originators.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Amount of penalty. The maximum
penalty is $8,500 for each violation, up
to a limit for any particular person of
$1,525,000 during any one-year period.
4. Revise § 30.35(c)(1) to read as
follows:
■
§ 30.35
§ 30.68
■
*
PO 00000
*
Mortgagees and lenders.
*
Frm 00045
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
10. Revise § 30.68(c) to read as
follows:
*
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
*
Section 8 owners.
*
18JAR1
*
*
4060
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5401–5426) (the Act)
authorizes HUD to establish the Federal
Manufactured Home Construction and
Safety Standards (Construction and
Safety Standards), codified in 24 CFR
part 3280. The Act was amended by the
Manufactured Housing Improvement
Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–569), which
expanded the Act’s purposes and
created MHCC. Congress established
MHCC to provide periodic
recommendations to the Secretary to
adopt or revise provisions of the
Construction and Safety Standards.
In 2002, MHCC began considering
revisions to the Construction and Safety
Standards and, in 2003, recommended
revisions to the current requirements for
roof truss testing.1 Those
recommendations were included in
HUD’s proposed rule to amend the
Construction and Safety Standards,
published in the Federal Register on
December 1, 2004 (69 FR 70016). After
considering public comment received
on the proposed rule, HUD returned the
proposal on truss testing procedures to
MHCC. As indicated in the preamble of
HUD’s final rule published in the
Federal Register on November 30, 2005
(70 FR 72024), which followed the
December 1, 2004, proposed rule, HUD
stated that truss testing procedures are
too important a safety consideration to
leave unaddressed. In returning the rule,
HUD also stated that the standards had
not been modified in a number of years
and needed to be examined to
determine whether they were adequate
to protect homeowners in all geographic
areas of the country. HUD’s review of
damage assessments following
Hurricane Charley reinforced its
conclusion regarding the need for the
MHCC to ensure that truss testing
procedures were updated and adequate
to protect homeowners from roof and
structural damage accompanying high
wind events.
HUD requested MHCC to work
expeditiously to reevaluate and
resubmit new proposals for truss testing
procedures. As a result, the Truss Test
Task Force of MHCC’s Standards
Subcommittee was established. Five
teleconferences of this task force were
held, and the full MHCC held two
teleconferences to review and vote on
new truss testing procedures. HUD
worked closely with MHCC throughout
the review and reevaluation process,
and agreed with the majority of the
proposals to strengthen the truss testing
procedures made by MHCC, but made
editorial revisions and modified the
I. Background
The National Manufactured Housing
Construction and Safety Standards Act
1 A truss is a triangular structure used to support
a roof. Multiple trusses are used to assemble the
framework for a roof.
(c) Maximum penalty. The maximum
penalty for each violation under this
section is $27,500.
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
11. Revise § 30.90(c) to read as
follows:
[Docket No. FR–5222–F–02]
§ 30.90
Manufactured Home Construction and
Safety Standards, Test Procedures for
Roof Trusses
■
RIN 2502–A172
Response to the complaint.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Filing with the administrative law
judges. HUD shall file the complaint
and response with the Docket Clerk,
Office of Administrative Law Judges, in
accordance with § 26.38 of this chapter.
If no response is submitted, then HUD
may file a motion for default judgment,
together with a copy of the complaint,
in accordance with § 26.41 of this title.
PART 180—CONSOLIDATED HUD
HEARING PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL
RIGHTS MATTERS
12. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 794; 42 U.S.C.
2000d–1, 3535(d), 3601–3619, 5301–5320,
and 6103.
13. Revise § 180.671 (a)(2) and (3) to
read as follows:
■
§ 180.671 Assessing civil penalties for Fair
Housing Act cases.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with
(a) * * *
(2) $42,500, if the respondent has
been adjudged in any administrative
hearing or civil action permitted under
the Fair Housing Act, or under any state
or local fair housing law, or in any
licensing or regulatory proceeding
conducted by a federal, state, or local
government agency, to have committed
one other discriminatory housing
practice and the adjudication was made
during the 5-year period preceding the
date of filing of the charge.
(3) $70,000, if the respondent has
been adjudged in any administrative
hearings or civil actions permitted
under the Fair Housing Act, or under
any state or local fair housing law, or in
any licensing or regulatory proceeding
conducted by a federal, state, or local
government agency, to have committed
two or more discriminatory housing
practices and the adjudications were
made during the 7-year period
preceding the date of filing of the
charge.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 8, 2013.
Shaun Donovan,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–01070 Filed 1–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:08 Jan 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
24 CFR Part 3280
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
roof truss testing procedures in the
Federal Manufactured Home
Construction and Safety Standards by
adopting certain recommendations
made by the Manufactured Home
Consensus Committee (MHCC), as
modified by HUD. Pursuant to the
National Manufactured Housing
Construction and Safety Standards Act
of 1974, HUD published a
recommendation submitted by MHCC to
revise the existing roof truss testing
procedures in 2003. In response to
public comments, HUD returned the
proposal to MHCC for further
evaluation. After further consideration,
MHCC submitted to HUD an amended
version of its original proposal on roof
truss testing. HUD was in agreement
with the majority of MHCC’s revised
recommendations on roof truss testing
which were published as a proposed
rule on June 16, 2010. Many of MHCC’s
recommendations are included in this
final rule. HUD identifies MHCC’s
proposals that were not accepted, or that
were modified in light of public
comments received or upon further
evaluation, and provides its reasons for
not accepting or for modifying these
proposed revisions.
DATES: Effective Date: January 13, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Henry S. Czauski, Acting Deputy
Administrator, Office of Manufactured
Housing Programs, Office of Housing,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room
9164, Washington, DC 20410–8000;
telephone number 202–708–6409 (this
is not a toll-free telephone number).
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 13 (Friday, January 18, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4057-4060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01070]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 28, 30, and 180
[Docket No. FR-5662-F-01]
RIN 2501-AD59
Inflation Adjustment of Civil Money Penalty Amounts
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends HUD's civil money penalty and civil
penalty regulations by making inflation adjustments that are required
by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28
U.S.C. 2461 note) (FCPIA Act). The FCPIA Act mandates the adjustments
and the formula used to calculate them. Also in this final rule, HUD is
taking the opportunity to update an outdated cross-reference in its
civil money penalty regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: February 19, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dane Narode, Associate General
Counsel, Office of Program Enforcement, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 1250 Maryland Avenue SW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20024;
telephone number 202-245-4141 (this is not a toll-free number).
Hearing- or speech-impaired individuals may access this number via TTY
by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28
U.S.C. 2461 note) (FCPIA Act), as amended by the Debt Collection
Improvement Act of 1996 (31 U.S.C. 3701) (DCIA), requires each federal
agency to make inflation adjustments to its maximum civil money
penalties and civil penalties. The formula for determining the specific
adjustment of such penalties for inflation is nondiscretionary and is
determined by section 5 of the FCPIA Act. The adjustment is based on
the change in the cost-of-living increase, which is defined in the
statute as based on the percentage change, if any, in the Consumer
Price Index (CPI). The statute also states specific rules for rounding
off, first-time adjustments and provides that adjusted civil money
penalties and civil penalties can only be applied prospectively; that
is, only to violations that occur after the date that the increase
takes effect.
II. This Final Rule
A. Inflation Adjustment of Civil Money Penalty and Civil Penalty
Amounts
The changes made by this final rule increase the amount of civil
money penalties, consistent with statutory authority for 24 CFR parts
28 and 30 and civil penalties consistent with 24 CFR part 180.
Additionally, no amendment is necessary to civil money penalties and
civil penalties found in some HUD regulations (e.g., 24 CFR parts
30.20, 30.25, and 180.671(a)(1)) because application of the statute's
[[Page 4058]]
formula would not result in an increase to the penalty.
Applying the statutory formula to determine the amount of the
adjustment is a four-step process. The first step entails determining
the inflation adjustment factor. This is done by calculating the
percentage increase by which the CPI for all urban consumers (CPI-U)
for the month of June of the calendar year preceding the adjustment
(i.e., June 2012) exceeds the CPI-U for the month of June of the
calendar year in which the amount of such civil monetary penalty was
last set or adjusted. CPI-U values are available at a Department of
Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics file transfer protocol site, ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt. Once the inflation
adjustment factor is determined, the second step is to calculate the
inflation increase. That is done by multiplying the inflation
adjustment factor by the current civil penalty amount. The third step
is to round off the inflation increase according to Section 5(a) of the
FCPIA Act, as amended by the DCIA. The FCPIA Act provides for a
``rounding-off,'' using multiples from $10 to $25,000, of the increase
calculated based on the change in the CPI. See 28 U.S.C. 2461(5)(a).
Once the inflation increase has been rounded, the last step is to add
the rounded inflation increase to the current civil penalty amount, to
obtain the new inflation-adjusted civil penalty amount. Consequently,
in those instances in which the increased dollar amount is determined
to be less than the applicable multiple, the existing penalty is
unchanged. The first time the civil penalty amount is adjusted, the
FCPIA Act limits any increase of the civil penalty to no more than 10
percent.
In Sec. 28.10, the maximum penalties for making a false claim or
written statement, as described in the regulation, is increased from
$7,500 to $8,500.
In Sec. 30.35(c)(1), the maximum penalties that the Mortgagee
Review Board may impose for a series of violations identified in the
regulations are increased from $7,500 to $8,500 per violation, and from
$1,375,000 to $1,525,000 for all violations committed during any one-
year period.
In Sec. 30.36(c), the maximum penalty that HUD may impose upon
participants in Federal Housing Administration (FHA) programs for
violations identified in the regulation is increased from $6,050 to
$7,050, and from $1,210,000 to a maximum of $1,335,000 for all
violations committed during any one-year period.
In Sec. 30.40(c), the maximum penalty that HUD may impose upon a
mortgagee or a holder of a guarantee certificate that violates the
statutory provisions concerning loan guarantees for Indian housing is
increased from $7,000 to $8,000 per violation, and from $1,375,000 to a
maximum of $1,525,000 for all violations committed during any one-year
period.
In Sec. 30.45(g), the maximum penalty that may be imposed upon a
mortgagor of a multifamily property or upon any person in a
relationship with the mortgagor, as described in the regulations, is
increased from $37,500 to $42,500 per violation.
In Sec. 30.50(c), the maximum penalty that may be imposed against
a Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) issuer or custodian
for a violation of any provision of 12 U.S.C. 1723i(b) or other
authorities cited in the regulations is increased from $7,500 to $8,500
per violation, and from $1,375,000 to $1,525,000 for all violations
committed during any one-year period.
In Sec. 30.60(c), the maximum penalty that HUD may impose upon any
dealer or sponsored third-party originator for, among other things,
falsifying statements or making false representations in violation of
section 2(b)(7) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1703(b)(7)) is
increased from $7,500 to $8,500 for each violation, and from $1,375,000
to a maximum of $1,525,000 during any one-year period.
In Sec. 30.68(c), the maximum penalty that may be imposed against
any owner, any general partner of a partnership owner, or any agent, as
described in the regulation, that provides a knowing and material
breach of a housing assistance payments contract, is increased from
$25,000 to $27,500 per violation.
In Sec. 180.671(a)(2) and (3), the maximum penalties that the
Administrative Law Judge may impose upon a respondent who is found to
have engaged in a discriminatory housing practice is increased from
$37,500 to $42,500, and from $65,000 to $70,000, respectively. The
maximum penalty of $16,000 at Sec. 180.671(a)(1) does not increase
under the formula.
B. Correction to 24 CFR 30.90
On December 17, 2008, HUD published a final rule (73 FR 76832) to
amend its regulations governing hearing procedures for administrative
sanction hearings pursuant to 2 CFR part 2424 and with respect to
determinations by the Multifamily Participation Review Committee
pursuant to 24 CFR part 200, subpart H. The final rule replaced and
reorganized Part 26. As a result, the cross-references to Part 26 in
Sec. 30.90 are outdated. This final rule takes the opportunity to
correct that by updating the cross-references in Sec. 30.90(c).
III. Justification for Final Rulemaking
In general, HUD publishes a rule for public comment before issuing
a rule for effect, in accordance with HUD's regulations on rulemaking
at 24 CFR part 10. Part 10, however, provides in Sec. 10.1 for
exceptions from that general rule where HUD finds good cause to omit
advance notice and public participation. The good cause requirement is
satisfied when the prior public procedure is ``impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public interest.''
HUD finds that good cause exists to publish this rule for effect
without first soliciting public comment because prior public comment is
unnecessary. This final rule merely follows the statutory directive in
the FCPIA Act allowing for periodic increases in HUD's civil money
penalties and civil penalties by applying the adjustment formula
established in the statute. Accordingly, because calculation of the
increases is formula-driven, HUD has no discretion in updating its
regulations to reflect the maximum allowable penalties derived from
application of the formula. HUD emphasizes that this rule addresses
only the matter of the calculation of the maximum civil money penalties
or civil penalties for the respective violations described in the
regulations. This rule does not address the issue of the Secretary's
discretion to impose or not to impose a penalty, nor the procedures
that HUD must follow in initiating a civil money penalty action, or in
seeking a civil penalty in a Fair Housing Act case.
IV. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review--Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if the
regulation is necessary, to select the regulatory approach that
maximizes net benefits. As discussed above in this preamble, this final
rule updates an incorrect cross reference and revises the civil money
penalty and civil penalty regulations to make inflation adjustments
required by the FCPIA Act. As a result, this rule was determined to be
not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and therefore was not
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
[[Page 4059]]
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)) generally requires
an agency to conduct regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule
subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. This final rule has
no economic impact on entities that are in compliance with relevant
laws and HUD regulations. This final rule does not establish special
procedures that would need to be complied with by small entities. All
entities, small or large, could be subject to the same penalties as
established by statute and implemented by this rule, but only if they
violate a relevant statute or regulation and become subject to civil
money penalties or civil penalties. Accordingly, the undersigned
certifies that this final rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency
from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by statute, or the rule preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This final rule will not have
federalism implications and would not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Environmental Review
This rule does not direct, provide for assistance or loan and
mortgage insurance for, or otherwise govern, or regulate, real property
acquisition, disposition, leasing, rehabilitation, alteration,
demolition, or new construction, or establish, revise, or provide for
standards for construction or construction materials, manufactured
housing, or occupancy. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this rule
is categorically excluded from environmental review under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and
tribal governments, and the private sector. This rule does not impose
any federal mandates on any state, local, or tribal government, or the
private sector within the meaning of UMRA.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 28
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Fraud, Penalties.
24 CFR Part 30
Administrative practice and procedure, Grant programs--housing and
community development, Loan programs--housing and community
development, Mortgages, Penalties.
24 CFR Part 180
Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Civil rights, Fair
housing, Individuals with disabilities, Investigations, Mortgages,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons described in the preamble, HUD amends
24 CFR parts 28, 30, and 180 to read as follows:
PART 28--IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT OF
1986
0
1. The authority citation for part 28 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note; 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812; 42 U.S.C.
3535(d).
0
2. Revise Sec. 28.10 (a)(1) introductory text and (b)(1) introductory
text to read as follows:
Sec. 28.10 Basis for civil penalties and assessments.
(a) Claims. (1) A civil penalty of not more than $8,500 may be
imposed upon a person who makes a claim that the person knows or has
reason to know:
* * * * *
(b) Statements. (1) A civil penalty of up to $8,500 may be imposed
upon a person who makes a written statement that:
* * * * *
PART 30--CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES: CERTAIN PROHIBITED CONDUCT
0
3. The authority citation for part 30 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1701q-1, 1703, 1723i, 1735f-14, 1735f-15;
15 U.S.C. 1717a; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note; 42 U.S.C. 1437z-1 and 3535(d).
0
4. Revise Sec. 30.35(c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 30.35 Mortgagees and lenders.
* * * * *
(c)(1) Amount of penalty. The maximum penalty is $8,500 for each
violation, up to a limit of $1,525,000 for all violations committed
during any one-year period. Each violation shall constitute a separate
violation as to each mortgage or loan application.
* * * * *
0
5. Revise Sec. 30.36(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 30.36 Other participants in FHA programs.
* * * * *
(c) Amount of penalty. The maximum penalty is $7,050 for each
violation, up to a limit of $1,335,000 for all violations committed
during any one-year period. Each violation shall constitute a separate
violation as to each mortgage or loan application.
0
6. Revise Sec. 30.40(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 30.40 Loan guarantees for Indian housing.
* * * * *
(c) Amount of penalty. The maximum penalty is $8,000 for each
violation, up to a limit of $1,525,000 for all violations committed
during any one-year period. Each violation shall constitute a separate
violation as to each mortgage or loan application.
0
7. Revise Sec. 30.45(g) to read as follows:
Sec. 30.45 Multifamily and Section 202 or 811 mortgagors.
* * * * *
(g) Maximum penalty. The maximum penalty for each violation under
paragraphs (c) and (f) of this section is $42,500.
* * * * *
0
8. Revise Sec. 30.50(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 30.50 GNMA issuers and custodians.
* * * * *
(c) Amount of penalty. The maximum penalty is $8,500 for each
violation, up to a limit of $1,525,000 during any one-year period. Each
violation shall constitute a separate violation with respect to each
pool of mortgages.
0
9. Revise Sec. 30.60(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 30.60 Dealers or sponsored third-party originators.
* * * * *
(c) Amount of penalty. The maximum penalty is $8,500 for each
violation, up to a limit for any particular person of $1,525,000 during
any one-year period.
0
10. Revise Sec. 30.68(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 30.68 Section 8 owners.
* * * * *
[[Page 4060]]
(c) Maximum penalty. The maximum penalty for each violation under
this section is $27,500.
* * * * *
0
11. Revise Sec. 30.90(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 30.90 Response to the complaint.
* * * * *
(c) Filing with the administrative law judges. HUD shall file the
complaint and response with the Docket Clerk, Office of Administrative
Law Judges, in accordance with Sec. 26.38 of this chapter. If no
response is submitted, then HUD may file a motion for default judgment,
together with a copy of the complaint, in accordance with Sec. 26.41
of this title.
PART 180--CONSOLIDATED HUD HEARING PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL RIGHTS
MATTERS
0
12. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 794; 42 U.S.C. 2000d-1, 3535(d), 3601-
3619, 5301-5320, and 6103.
0
13. Revise Sec. 180.671 (a)(2) and (3) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.671 Assessing civil penalties for Fair Housing Act cases.
(a) * * *
(2) $42,500, if the respondent has been adjudged in any
administrative hearing or civil action permitted under the Fair Housing
Act, or under any state or local fair housing law, or in any licensing
or regulatory proceeding conducted by a federal, state, or local
government agency, to have committed one other discriminatory housing
practice and the adjudication was made during the 5-year period
preceding the date of filing of the charge.
(3) $70,000, if the respondent has been adjudged in any
administrative hearings or civil actions permitted under the Fair
Housing Act, or under any state or local fair housing law, or in any
licensing or regulatory proceeding conducted by a federal, state, or
local government agency, to have committed two or more discriminatory
housing practices and the adjudications were made during the 7-year
period preceding the date of filing of the charge.
* * * * *
Dated: January 8, 2013.
Shaun Donovan,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-01070 Filed 1-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P