Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Training Mission and Mission Support Activities at Fort Campbell, KY, 4135-4136 [2013-01002]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2013 / Notices
specific NEPA analysis may be required
at some installations, depending on the
size of the force realignment.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
February 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to: Public Comments USAEC,
Attention: IMPA–AE (Army 2020 PEA),
2450 Connell Road (Bldg 2264), Fort
Sam Houston, Texas 78234–7664; or by
email to
USARMY.JBSA.AEC.MBX@mail.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
(210) 466–1590 or email:
USARMY.JBSA.AEC.MBX@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Implementation of Army force
realignment will occur over the course
of several years to arrive by 2020 at an
optimally configured force, reduced
from an FY 2012 authorized end
strength of 562,000 to 490,000.
Reductions in Army Soldiers will also
be accompanied by some reduction in
civil service employees. These actions
are being undertaken to reshape the
Army’s forces to meet more effectively
national security requirements while
reducing the Army’s end-strength. Force
realignment and some level of force
reduction will impact most major Army
installations. The implementation of
this force rebalancing is necessary to
allow the Army to operate in a reduced
budget climate, while ensuring the
Army can continue to support the
nation’s critical defense missions.
The PEA, upon which the draft FNSI
is based, evaluates the largest potential
force reduction scenarios, as well as
growth scenarios from BCT
restructuring, that could occur at select
installations as a result of Army force
restructuring. This range of potential
installation reduction and growth
(ranging from maximum losses of 8,000
military personnel to maximum
increases of 3,000 at the Army’s largest
installations) was chosen for the
environmental analysis to provide
flexibility as future force structure
realignment decisions are made; the
specific locations where changes will
occur have not been decided.
The PEA provides information to
decision makers concerning potential
environmental impacts, to include
socioeconomic impacts, associated with
stationing actions as these decisions are
made in the coming years. The PEA
analyzed the direct, indirect, and
cumulative environmental impacts that
may occur at 21 installations. These
stationing sites were included in the
PEA as they are sites that could
experience a change in Soldiers and
civilians that exceeds a total of 1,000
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jan 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
military personnel. The PEA analyzes
the environmental impact of two Action
alternatives to implement force
reduction and realignment: Alternative
1: Implement Army force reductions
and restructuring of BCTs, combat
support units, and civilian support
between FY 2013 and FY 2020; and
Alternative 2: Implement Alternative 1,
inactivate additional BCTs and also
restructure remaining BCTs by adding
an additional combat maneuver
battalion and/or an engineer battalion.
Force reductions that may occur as part
of the proposed action include the
inactivation of BCTs and combat
support and combat service support
units at Army and joint base
installations. This reduction would
include the inactivation of at least eight
BCTs. In addition to these alternatives,
the Army also evaluated a No Action
alternative. The No Action alternative
continues current force structure, and
retains the active Army at the FY 2012
authorized end strength of 562,000. The
No Action alternative allows for a
comparison of baseline conditions with
the environmental impacts of each of
the two Action alternatives.
Environmental impacts associated
with implementation of the two Action
alternatives include impacts to air
quality; airspace; cultural and biological
resources; noise; soil erosion; wetlands;
water resources; facilities;
socioeconomics; energy demand; land
use; hazardous materials and waste; and
traffic and transportation. No significant
environmental impacts are anticipated
as a result of implementing either
alternative associated with the proposed
action, with the exception of
socioeconomic impacts. Socioeconomic
impacts are of particular concern to the
Army because they affect communities
around Army installations. Therefore,
the PEA has a comprehensive analysis
of the socioeconomic impacts to inform
the decision makers and communities.
Impacts could include reduced
employment, income, regional
population, and sales, and some of these
impacts could be significant. An EIS is
not required, however, when the only
significant impacts are socioeconomic.
The draft FNSI finds that there are no
significant environmental impacts with
either Action alternative. Final
decisions as to which alternative will be
implemented or which installations will
see reductions or unit realignments have
not been made. Those decisions will be
made based on mission-related criteria
and other factors in light of the
information contained in the PEA.
An electronic version of the PEA and
draft FNSI is available for download at:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4135
https://aec.army.mil/usaec/nepa/
topics00.html.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–01003 Filed 1–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement for the Training Mission and
Mission Support Activities at Fort
Campbell, KY
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the Army
announces its intent to prepare a
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS) to evaluate the impacts
of current and future training and
mission-related activities at Fort
Campbell, Kentucky (portions of Fort
Campbell are also located in Tennessee).
The PEIS is being completed to meet the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to
evaluate the environmental impacts of
proposed alternatives for implementing
the training and mission support
activities at Fort Campbell, Kentucky.
The PEIS will assess range construction,
associated training and land
management activities, and adjustments
to military airspace to support Fort
Campbell’s training requirements. This
PEIS analyzes portions of the Range
Complex Master Plan which has been
developed to address training and
training facility requirements over the
next 10 years.
ADDRESSES: Please send written
comments to Mr. Gene Zirkle, NEPA/
Wildlife Program Manager,
Environmental Division, Building 2159
13th Street, Fort Campbell, KY 42223; or
by email to gene.a.zirkle.civ@mail.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Gene Zirkle at (270) 798–9854, during
normal working business hours Monday
through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
C.S.T.; or by email to
gene.a.zirkle.civ@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fort
Campbell must provide modernized
live-fire ranges, quality maneuver
training areas, the airspace necessary for
the training of Army aviation units and
unmanned aerial systems (UAS), and
modern training facilities. The
requirement to provide quality training
support to Soldiers and units will
continue into the future as mission
requirements, military preparedness,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM
18JAN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
4136
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2013 / Notices
and Soldier/unit training requirements
change. Fort Campbell must be prepared
to meet future training requirements by
providing modern training facilities and
ranges.
As technology changes, new weapons,
weapons systems, and unmanned
systems are incorporated into tactical
units. These technological advances
dictate changes to how the Army trains,
the space needed for maneuver training
to include airspace, and new ranges to
accommodate the live-fire training on
new weapon systems. In addition, the
installation must support training of
other military services as well as
training of various federal organizations.
Fort Campbell’s ranges and training
lands require routine maintenance,
modernization, and in some cases
construction of new facilities to
continue to provide Soldiers with a high
quality training environment. These
types of activities will continue into the
future as mission requirements, military
preparedness, and Soldier training
requirements change.
A range of reasonable alternatives will
be analyzed in the PEIS. Five
alternatives have been identified to meet
the requirements of the proposed action.
Alternative 1 would provide for sitespecific range construction projects
needed to support the live-fire training
on the installation. Alternative 2 would
create adaptable use zones (AUZ) to
facilitate future range modernization
and construction. Alternative 3 would
implement routine range and training
land actions to maintain and sustain the
installation range and training land
complex in an environmentally sound
manner. This includes the formalization
of environmental stewardship best
management practices (BMPs).
Alternative 4 would restructure and
expand the current controlled airspace
to accommodate the Army aviation
units, UAS, and joint training with the
U.S. Air Force. Alternative 5 would
implement the above 4 alternatives as
one consolidated alternative.
The PEIS will also consider a No
Action alternative. Under the No Action
alternative, none of the action
alternatives would be implemented.
Range use and training land
management would continue under the
status quo. Other reasonable alternatives
identified during the scoping process
will be considered for evaluation in the
PEIS.
The proposed action would allow
future development of Fort Campbell’s
training infrastructure that could have
significant impacts to airspace, natural
and cultural resources, water resources,
and other environmental resources.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jan 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
Mitigation measures will also be
identified for adverse impacts.
Scoping and public comments:
Federally recognized Indian Tribes,
federal, state, and local agencies,
organizations, and the public are invited
to be involved in the scoping process for
the preparation of this PEIS by
participating in meetings and/or
submitting written comments. The
scoping process will help identify
possible alternatives, potential
environmental impacts, and key issues
of concern to be analyzed in the PEIS.
Written comments will be accepted
within 30 days of publication of the
Notice of Intent in the Federal Register.
Public meetings will be held in
Clarksville, Tennessee and
Hopkinsville, Kentucky. Notification of
the times and locations for the scoping
meetings will be published locally.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–01002 Filed 1–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Missouri River Recovery
Management Plan, Missouri River,
United States
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE), Kansas
City and Omaha Districts, intend to
prepare the Missouri River Recovery
Management Plan (Plan) with integrated
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information and/or questions
about the proposed Plan, please contact
Ms. Lisa Rabbe, Project Manager, by
telephone: (816) 389–3837, by mail: 601
E. 12th Street, Kansas City, MO 64106,
or by email:
Lisa.A.Rabbe@usace.army.mil, or Mr.
Randy Sellers, Project Manager, by
telephone: (402) 995–2689, by mail:
1616 Capitol Avenue, Omaha, NE
68102–4901, or by email:
Randy.P.Sellers@usace.army.mil
mailto:Gwyn.M.Jarrett@usace.army.mil.
For inquiries from the media, please
contact the USACE Kansas City District
Public Affairs Officer (PAO), Mr. David
Kolarik by telephone: (816) 389–3486,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
by mail: 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City,
MO 64106, or by email:
David.S.Kolarik@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Through
preparation of the Plan and EIS, USACE
will develop a range of alternatives for
the purposes of Missouri River recovery
and mitigation. This federal action
includes activities on the Missouri River
and is designed to assist in the recovery
of Missouri River species protected
under the Federal Endangered Species
Act (ESA). Mitigation actions address
USACE’s requirements pursuant to the
1958 Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (Pub. L. 85–624), section 601(a) of
the Water Resources Development Act
(WRDA) of 1986, and section 334(a) and
(b) of the WRDA of 1999, and Section
3176 of the WRDA 2007.
Section 3176 of WRDA 2007
expanded the USACE’s authority to
include recovery and mitigation
activities on the Missouri River in the
upper basin states of Montana,
Nebraska, North Dakota, and South
Dakota. The combination of recovery
and mitigation activities is commonly
referred to as the Missouri River
Recovery Program.
In accordance with 40 CFR 1502.4 (c),
this EIS will evaluate all proposals or
parts of proposals similar in nature such
that, in effect, they represent a single
course of action. The Missouri River
Recovery Management Plan EIS will
assess and, where appropriate,
supplement or update prior analysis
made pursuant to the requirements
listed above. The EIS will assess the
cumulative effects and alternatives to
accomplish the purposes of the ESA, the
1958 Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (Pub. L. 85–624), section 601(a) of
the Water Resources Development Act
(WRDA) of 1986, and section 334(a) and
(b) of the WRDA of 1999, and Section
3176 of the WRDA 2007. The federal
actions which implement those
authorities have been combined into
one program and are being assessed
together to effectively and efficiently
carry out the multiple goals associated
with the authorizations. Additionally to
be addressed in this EIS, the USACE has
received a proposal from the Missouri
River Recovery Implementation
Committee, recommending the agency
perform an effects analysis and adaptive
management of potential management
actions on ESA listed species.
Addressing this proposal will result in
an analysis of management alternatives
and adaptive management actions to
benefit these species, and thus requires
supporting environmental effects
analyses which will be included in this
Environmental Impact Statement.
E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM
18JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 13 (Friday, January 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4135-4136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01002]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Training
Mission and Mission Support Activities at Fort Campbell, KY
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces its intent to prepare a
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) to evaluate the
impacts of current and future training and mission-related activities
at Fort Campbell, Kentucky (portions of Fort Campbell are also located
in Tennessee). The PEIS is being completed to meet the requirements of
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to evaluate the
environmental impacts of proposed alternatives for implementing the
training and mission support activities at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. The
PEIS will assess range construction, associated training and land
management activities, and adjustments to military airspace to support
Fort Campbell's training requirements. This PEIS analyzes portions of
the Range Complex Master Plan which has been developed to address
training and training facility requirements over the next 10 years.
ADDRESSES: Please send written comments to Mr. Gene Zirkle, NEPA/
Wildlife Program Manager, Environmental Division, Building 2159 13th
Street, Fort Campbell, KY 42223; or by email to
gene.a.zirkle.civ@mail.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gene Zirkle at (270) 798-9854,
during normal working business hours Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m. C.S.T.; or by email to gene.a.zirkle.civ@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fort Campbell must provide modernized live-
fire ranges, quality maneuver training areas, the airspace necessary
for the training of Army aviation units and unmanned aerial systems
(UAS), and modern training facilities. The requirement to provide
quality training support to Soldiers and units will continue into the
future as mission requirements, military preparedness,
[[Page 4136]]
and Soldier/unit training requirements change. Fort Campbell must be
prepared to meet future training requirements by providing modern
training facilities and ranges.
As technology changes, new weapons, weapons systems, and unmanned
systems are incorporated into tactical units. These technological
advances dictate changes to how the Army trains, the space needed for
maneuver training to include airspace, and new ranges to accommodate
the live-fire training on new weapon systems. In addition, the
installation must support training of other military services as well
as training of various federal organizations.
Fort Campbell's ranges and training lands require routine
maintenance, modernization, and in some cases construction of new
facilities to continue to provide Soldiers with a high quality training
environment. These types of activities will continue into the future as
mission requirements, military preparedness, and Soldier training
requirements change.
A range of reasonable alternatives will be analyzed in the PEIS.
Five alternatives have been identified to meet the requirements of the
proposed action. Alternative 1 would provide for site-specific range
construction projects needed to support the live-fire training on the
installation. Alternative 2 would create adaptable use zones (AUZ) to
facilitate future range modernization and construction. Alternative 3
would implement routine range and training land actions to maintain and
sustain the installation range and training land complex in an
environmentally sound manner. This includes the formalization of
environmental stewardship best management practices (BMPs). Alternative
4 would restructure and expand the current controlled airspace to
accommodate the Army aviation units, UAS, and joint training with the
U.S. Air Force. Alternative 5 would implement the above 4 alternatives
as one consolidated alternative.
The PEIS will also consider a No Action alternative. Under the No
Action alternative, none of the action alternatives would be
implemented. Range use and training land management would continue
under the status quo. Other reasonable alternatives identified during
the scoping process will be considered for evaluation in the PEIS.
The proposed action would allow future development of Fort
Campbell's training infrastructure that could have significant impacts
to airspace, natural and cultural resources, water resources, and other
environmental resources. Mitigation measures will also be identified
for adverse impacts.
Scoping and public comments: Federally recognized Indian Tribes,
federal, state, and local agencies, organizations, and the public are
invited to be involved in the scoping process for the preparation of
this PEIS by participating in meetings and/or submitting written
comments. The scoping process will help identify possible alternatives,
potential environmental impacts, and key issues of concern to be
analyzed in the PEIS. Written comments will be accepted within 30 days
of publication of the Notice of Intent in the Federal Register. Public
meetings will be held in Clarksville, Tennessee and Hopkinsville,
Kentucky. Notification of the times and locations for the scoping
meetings will be published locally.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-01002 Filed 1-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P