Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of Utah; Smoke Management Requirements for Mandatory Class I Areas, 4071-4073 [2013-00362]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0228]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan Including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, and
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel,
Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a segment of the Safety Zone; Brandon
Road Lock and Dam to Lake Michigan
including Des Plaines River, Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago River,
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel on all
waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal from Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile
Marker 296.7 at various times on
February 12 through February 15, 2013.
This action is necessary to protect the
waterways, waterway users, and vessels
from hazards associated with the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers
Electromagnetic Fields evaluation
operations.
During any of the below listed
enforcement periods, entry into,
transiting, mooring, laying-up or
anchoring within the enforced area of
this safety zone by any person or vessel
is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
The regulations in 33 CFR
165.930 will be enforced from 7:00 a.m.
to 11:00 a.m. and from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00
p.m. on February 12 through February
15, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or email MST1 Joseph McCollum,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, telephone 414–
747–7148, email address
joseph.p.mccollum@uscg.mil.
DATES:
The Coast
Guard will enforce a segment of the
Safety Zone; Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, CalumetSaganashkee Channel, Chicago, IL,
listed in 33 CFR 165.930. Specifically,
the Coast Guard will enforce this safety
zone between Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:08 Jan 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
Marker 296.7 on all waters of the
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal.
Enforcement will occur from 7:00 a.m.
until 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. until 5:00
p.m. on February 12 through February
15, 2013.
This enforcement action is necessary
because the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan has determined that the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Electromagnetic Fields evaluation
operations pose risks to life and
property. Because of these risks, it is
necessary to control vessel movement
during the evaluation operations to
prevent injury and property loss.
In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into, transiting, mooring, laying up or
anchoring within the enforced area of
this safety zone by any person or vessel
is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her designated
representative.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.930 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
In addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, will also provide notice
through other means, which may
include, but are not limited to,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local
Notice to Mariners, local news media,
distribution in leaflet form, and onscene oral notice.
Additionally, the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, may notify
representatives from the maritime
industry through telephonic and email
notifications.
Dated: January 8, 2013.
M. W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2013–00970 Filed 1–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0636; FRL–9636–6]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plans; State of Utah;
Smoke Management Requirements for
Mandatory Class I Areas
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Utah on
September 29, 2011. The September 29,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4071
2011 revision establishes rule R307–204
of the Utah Administrative Code (UAC).
R307–204 contains smoke management
requirements for land managers within
the State of Utah as required by the
regulations for regional haze (RH). The
September 29, 2011 submittal
supersedes and replaces R307–204
submitted as part of the State’s
December 12, 2003 RH SIP. The
September 29, 2011 submittal also
supersedes and replaces the State’s May
8, 2006 submittal of R307–204.
EPA is also partially approving a SIP
revision submitted by the State of Utah
on May 26, 2011. Specifically, EPA is
proposing to approve section XX.G of
the State’s RH SIP, which contains the
State’s long-term strategy for fire
programs as required by the RH
regulations. The May 26, 2011 submittal
supersedes and replaces SIP revisions to
section XX.G of the RH SIP submitted
by the State on December 12, 2003 and
September 9, 2008. This action is being
taken under section 110 of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
Effective Date: This final rule is
effective February 19, 2013.
DATES:
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0636. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel Dygowski, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202–
1129, (303) 312–6144,
dygowski.laurel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
4072
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our
mean or refer to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to
State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words Utah and State mean
the State of Utah.
Table of Contents
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background Information
Under 40 CFR 51.309 of the RH
program, there are numerous
requirements aimed at protecting the 16
Class I areas of the Colorado Plateau.
This action only addresses the
requirements pertaining to programs
related to fire of 40 CFR 51.309(d)(6).
Pursuant to 40 CFR 51.309(d)(6), a state
must show that its smoke management
program and all federal or private
programs for prescribed fire in the state
have a mechanism in place for
evaluating and addressing the degree of
visibility impairment from smoke in
their planning and application of
burning. A state must also ensure that
its prescribed fire smoke management
programs have at least the following
seven elements: Actions to minimize
emissions, evaluation of smoke
dispersion, alternatives to fire, public
notification, air quality monitoring,
surveillance and enforcement, and
program evaluation.
States must include in their section
309 plan a statewide process for
gathering the essential post-burn
activity information to support
emissions inventory and tracking
systems. States must identify existing
administrative barriers to the use of
non-burning alternatives and adopt a
process for continuing to identify and
remove administrative barriers where
feasible. The SIP must include an
enhanced smoke management program,
which means the smoke management
program considers visibility and is
based on the criteria of efficiency,
economics, law, emission reduction
opportunities, land management
objectives, and reduction of visibility
impairment. States must also adopt a
process to establish annual emission
goals to minimize emission increases
from fire.
On December 12, 2003, the State of
Utah submitted a RH SIP intended to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:08 Jan 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
meet all of the requirements under 40
CFR 51.309. This submittal adopted SIP
section XX—Regional Haze as well as
UAC R307–204 Emissions Standards:
Smoke Management. The State revised
the smoke management requirements of
R307–204 in a May 8, 2006 submittal
and then again in its September 29,
2011 submittal. The September 29, 2011
submittal supersedes and replaces the
R307–204 portion of the December 12,
2003 submittal and all of the May 8,
2006 submittal. R307–204 contains
provisions necessary to meet the
requirements of 40 CFR 51.309(d)(6)
which pertain to smoke management.
Section XX.G—Long-Term Strategy
for Fire Programs of the State’s RH SIP
also contains provisions necessary to
meet the requirements of 40 CFR
51.309(d)(6). The State originally
submitted Section XX.G with its
December 12, 2003 RH SIP submittal.
The State resubmitted this section with
subsequent SIP revisions on September
9, 2008 and May 26, 2011. Section XX.G
of the May 26, 2011 submittal
supersedes and replaces section XX.G of
the December 12, 2003 and September
9, 2008 submittals. EPA will be taking
action on the remainder of the
December 12, 2003, September 9, 2008,
and May 26, 2011 submittals at a later
date.
On November 8, 2011, EPA published
a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR)
for the State of Utah (76 FR 69217). The
NPR proposed approval of the smoke
management requirements adopted by
the State as part of the September 29,
2011 (R307–204) and May 26, 2011
(section XX.G) SIP submittals.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving a SIP revision
submitted by the State of Utah on
September 29, 2011. The September 29,
2011 revision establishes UAC R307–
204. R307–204 contains smoke
management requirements for land
managers within the State of Utah as
required by 40 CFR 51.309(d)(6) for
regional haze. The September 29, 2011
submittal supersedes and replaces
R307–204 submitted as part of the
State’s December 12, 2003 regional haze
SIP. The September 29, 2011 submittal
also supersedes and replaces the State’s
May 8, 2006 submittal of R307–204.
EPA is also partially approving a SIP
revision submitted by the State of Utah
on May 26, 2011. Specifically, EPA is
approving section XX.G of the State’s
RH SIP which contains the State’s longterm strategy for fire programs as
required by 40 CFR 51.309(d)(6). The
May 26, 2011 submittal supersedes and
replaces SIP revisions to section XX.G of
the RH SIP submitted by the State on
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
December 12, 2003 and September 9,
2008.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 19, 2013.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: February 8, 2012.
James B. Martin,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as
follows:
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0607; FRL–9360–8]
14:08 Jan 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
40 CFR Parts 9 and 168
PART 52—[AMENDED]
RIN 2070–AJ53
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
Labeling of Pesticide Products and
Devices for Export; Clarification of
Requirements
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart TT—Utah
2. Section 52.2320 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(72) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2320
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(72) On May 26, 2011 and September
29, 2011, the State of Utah submitted
revisions to its State Implementation
Plan to incorporate the smoke
management requirements of the
regional haze program.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Title R307 of the Utah
Administrative Code—Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, Rule R307–204—
Emission Standards: Smoke
Management, sections -1, Purpose and
Goals, and -2, Applicability. Effective
December 31, 2003; as published in the
Utah State Bulletin October 1, 2003 and
January 15, 2004.
(B) Title R307 of the Utah
Administrative Code—Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, Rule R307–204—
Emission Standards: Smoke
Management, section -4, General
Requirements. Effective April 7, 2006;
as published in the Utah State Bulletin
March 1, 2006 and May 1, 2006.
(C) Title R307 of the Utah
Administrative Code, Rule R307–204—
Environmental Quality, Air Quality,
Rule R307–204—Emission Standards:
Smoke Management, sections -3,
Definitions, -5, Burn Schedule, -6, Small
Prescribed Fires (de minimis), -7, Small
Prescribed Pile Fires (de minimis), -8,
Large Prescribed Fires, -9, Large
Prescribed Pile Fires, and -10,
Requirements for Wildland Fire Use
Events. Effective July 7, 2011; as
published in the Utah State Bulletin
May 1, 2011 and August 1, 2011.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Section XX.G of the Utah Regional
Haze State Implementation Pan.
Effective April 7, 2011. Published in the
Utah State Bulletin February 1, 2011.
[FR Doc. 2013–00362 Filed 1–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
4073
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is revising the
regulations on the labeling of pesticide
products and devices intended solely
for export. Specifically, EPA is
restructuring the current regulations to
clarify which provisions apply under
various circumstances. EPA is also
increasing specificity in the regulations
by requiring that people who transfer
unregistered pesticide products between
registered establishments operated by
the same producer within the United
States must also comply with the
requirements of this part if those
products are intended solely for export
at the time of such transfer. EPA
believes that this requirement is
necessary to ensure appropriate
handling of such products as they move
in commerce before they actually leave
the United States.
DATES: This final rule is effective March
19, 2013. The compliance date for the
requirement to label unregistered
pesticide products intended solely for
export that are being shipped between
registered establishments operated by
the same producer is January 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0607, is
available either at https://
www.regulations.gov, or at the OPP
Docket in the Environmental Protection
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC),
located in EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460. The Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vera
Au, Field and External Affairs Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 13 (Friday, January 18, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4071-4073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00362]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0636; FRL-9636-6]
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of
Utah; Smoke Management Requirements for Mandatory Class I Areas
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Utah on September 29, 2011. The September 29,
2011 revision establishes rule R307-204 of the Utah Administrative Code
(UAC). R307-204 contains smoke management requirements for land
managers within the State of Utah as required by the regulations for
regional haze (RH). The September 29, 2011 submittal supersedes and
replaces R307-204 submitted as part of the State's December 12, 2003 RH
SIP. The September 29, 2011 submittal also supersedes and replaces the
State's May 8, 2006 submittal of R307-204.
EPA is also partially approving a SIP revision submitted by the
State of Utah on May 26, 2011. Specifically, EPA is proposing to
approve section XX.G of the State's RH SIP, which contains the State's
long-term strategy for fire programs as required by the RH regulations.
The May 26, 2011 submittal supersedes and replaces SIP revisions to
section XX.G of the RH SIP submitted by the State on December 12, 2003
and September 9, 2008. This action is being taken under section 110 of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective February 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0636. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air
Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel Dygowski, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6144,
dygowski.laurel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 4072]]
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain
words or initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air
Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words Utah and State mean the State of Utah.
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background Information
Under 40 CFR 51.309 of the RH program, there are numerous
requirements aimed at protecting the 16 Class I areas of the Colorado
Plateau. This action only addresses the requirements pertaining to
programs related to fire of 40 CFR 51.309(d)(6). Pursuant to 40 CFR
51.309(d)(6), a state must show that its smoke management program and
all federal or private programs for prescribed fire in the state have a
mechanism in place for evaluating and addressing the degree of
visibility impairment from smoke in their planning and application of
burning. A state must also ensure that its prescribed fire smoke
management programs have at least the following seven elements: Actions
to minimize emissions, evaluation of smoke dispersion, alternatives to
fire, public notification, air quality monitoring, surveillance and
enforcement, and program evaluation.
States must include in their section 309 plan a statewide process
for gathering the essential post-burn activity information to support
emissions inventory and tracking systems. States must identify existing
administrative barriers to the use of non-burning alternatives and
adopt a process for continuing to identify and remove administrative
barriers where feasible. The SIP must include an enhanced smoke
management program, which means the smoke management program considers
visibility and is based on the criteria of efficiency, economics, law,
emission reduction opportunities, land management objectives, and
reduction of visibility impairment. States must also adopt a process to
establish annual emission goals to minimize emission increases from
fire.
On December 12, 2003, the State of Utah submitted a RH SIP intended
to meet all of the requirements under 40 CFR 51.309. This submittal
adopted SIP section XX--Regional Haze as well as UAC R307-204 Emissions
Standards: Smoke Management. The State revised the smoke management
requirements of R307-204 in a May 8, 2006 submittal and then again in
its September 29, 2011 submittal. The September 29, 2011 submittal
supersedes and replaces the R307-204 portion of the December 12, 2003
submittal and all of the May 8, 2006 submittal. R307-204 contains
provisions necessary to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 51.309(d)(6)
which pertain to smoke management.
Section XX.G--Long-Term Strategy for Fire Programs of the State's
RH SIP also contains provisions necessary to meet the requirements of
40 CFR 51.309(d)(6). The State originally submitted Section XX.G with
its December 12, 2003 RH SIP submittal. The State resubmitted this
section with subsequent SIP revisions on September 9, 2008 and May 26,
2011. Section XX.G of the May 26, 2011 submittal supersedes and
replaces section XX.G of the December 12, 2003 and September 9, 2008
submittals. EPA will be taking action on the remainder of the December
12, 2003, September 9, 2008, and May 26, 2011 submittals at a later
date.
On November 8, 2011, EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPR) for the State of Utah (76 FR 69217). The NPR proposed approval of
the smoke management requirements adopted by the State as part of the
September 29, 2011 (R307-204) and May 26, 2011 (section XX.G) SIP
submittals.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving a SIP revision submitted by the State of Utah on
September 29, 2011. The September 29, 2011 revision establishes UAC
R307-204. R307-204 contains smoke management requirements for land
managers within the State of Utah as required by 40 CFR 51.309(d)(6)
for regional haze. The September 29, 2011 submittal supersedes and
replaces R307-204 submitted as part of the State's December 12, 2003
regional haze SIP. The September 29, 2011 submittal also supersedes and
replaces the State's May 8, 2006 submittal of R307-204. EPA is also
partially approving a SIP revision submitted by the State of Utah on
May 26, 2011. Specifically, EPA is approving section XX.G of the
State's RH SIP which contains the State's long-term strategy for fire
programs as required by 40 CFR 51.309(d)(6). The May 26, 2011 submittal
supersedes and replaces SIP revisions to section XX.G of the RH SIP
submitted by the State on December 12, 2003 and September 9, 2008.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the
[[Page 4073]]
absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary
consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP
submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in
place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 19, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: February 8, 2012.
James B. Martin,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart TT--Utah
0
2. Section 52.2320 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(72) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(72) On May 26, 2011 and September 29, 2011, the State of Utah
submitted revisions to its State Implementation Plan to incorporate the
smoke management requirements of the regional haze program.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code--Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, Rule R307-204--Emission Standards: Smoke
Management, sections -1, Purpose and Goals, and -2, Applicability.
Effective December 31, 2003; as published in the Utah State Bulletin
October 1, 2003 and January 15, 2004.
(B) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code--Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, Rule R307-204--Emission Standards: Smoke
Management, section -4, General Requirements. Effective April 7, 2006;
as published in the Utah State Bulletin March 1, 2006 and May 1, 2006.
(C) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Rule R307-204--
Environmental Quality, Air Quality, Rule R307-204--Emission Standards:
Smoke Management, sections -3, Definitions, -5, Burn Schedule, -6,
Small Prescribed Fires (de minimis), -7, Small Prescribed Pile Fires
(de minimis), -8, Large Prescribed Fires, -9, Large Prescribed Pile
Fires, and -10, Requirements for Wildland Fire Use Events. Effective
July 7, 2011; as published in the Utah State Bulletin May 1, 2011 and
August 1, 2011.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Section XX.G of the Utah Regional Haze State Implementation
Pan. Effective April 7, 2011. Published in the Utah State Bulletin
February 1, 2011.
[FR Doc. 2013-00362 Filed 1-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P