Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-Performance Reporting System, Management Evaluation, 3394-3396 [2013-00823]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
3394
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2013 / Notices
Regulation section
Estimated
number of
respondents
Title
Reports filed
annually
Estimated
hours/
response
Total annual
response
Annual burden
hours
Affected Public: STATE & LOCAL AGENCIES (Including Indian Tribal Organizations and US Territories)
Reporting
249.3(e) ........................
249.4 ............................
249.10(e) ......................
249.10(f) .......................
510
51
804
51
1
1
1
1
510
51
804
51
2
40
1.5
5
1,020
2,040
1,206
255
51
51
1
1
51
51
3
10
153
510
5
1
5
160
800
12
1
12
10
120
249.18(b) ......................
249.23(b) ......................
Local Agency Applications
State Plan ...........................
Monitoring/review of outlets
Coupon/CSA management
system.
Coupon reconciliation .........
Financial management system.
Prior Approval for costs per
7 CFR 3016.22.
State agency corrective action plans.
Audit responses .................
Financial/recipient reports ..
12
51
1
1
12
51
15
40
180
2,040
Subtotal .................
(Reporting Requirements) ..
1,598
........................
1,598
5.20
8,324
249.10(h) ......................
249.11 ..........................
249.12 ..........................
249.17(b)(2) .................
Affected Public: INDIVIDUALS/HOUSEHOLDS (Applicants for Program Benefits)
Reporting
249.6 (a)(3) ..................
Subtotal .................
Certification data for seniors.
900,000
1
900,000
0.25
225,000
(Reporting Requirements) ..
900,000
........................
900,000
........................
225,000
Affected Public: Farms (Farmers/Markets/Roadside stands/CSA’s)
Reporting
249.10(b) ......................
Subtotal .................
Farmer applications &
agreements.
4,598
1
4,598
1
4,598
(Reporting Requirements) ..
4,598
........................
4,598
........................
4,598
906,196
1
906,196
.263
237,922
Subtotal Reporting
Affected Public: STATE & LOCAL AGENCIES (Including Indian Tribal Organizations and US Territories)
Recordkeeping
249.9 ............................
249.10(b) ......................
249.10(e) ......................
249.11 ..........................
249.16(a) ......................
249.23(a) ......................
Subtotal .................
Total Burden
Nutrition education .............
Authorized outlet agreements.
Summary of authorized outlet monitoring.
Record of financial expenditures.
Fair hearings ......................
Record of program operations.
900,000
51
1
1
900,000
51
0.25
2
225,000
102
51
1
51
2
102
51
1
51
2
102
51
51
1
1
51
51
1
40
51
2,040
(Recordkeeping Requirements).
900,255
1
900,255
.253
227,397
1,806,451
........................
1,806,451
........................
465,319
(Reporting & Recordkeeping).
Dated: January 10, 2013.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ACTION:
Food and Nutrition Service
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2013–00816 Filed 1–15–13; 8:45 am]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—Performance
Reporting System, Management
Evaluation
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Jan 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice.
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This is a revision of a currently
approved collection under OMB 0584–
0010, which is due to expire April 30,
2013.
E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM
16JAN1
3395
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2013 / Notices
Written comments must be
received on or before March 18, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions that
were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments may be sent to: Billy
DeLancey, Food and Nutrition Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 8–44,
Alexandria, VA 22302.
Comments may also be submitted via
fax to the attention of Billy DeLancey at
703–305–2486 or via email to
Billy.DeLancey@fns.usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Billy DeLancey at
703–305–2480.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Performance Reporting System,
Management Evaluation.
OMB Number: 0584–0010.
Expiration Date: 4/30/2013.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: The purpose of the
Performance Reporting System (PRS) is
to ensure that each State agency and
project area is operating the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) in accordance with the
requirements of the Food and Nutrition
Act of 2008 (the Act) (7 U.S.C. 2011, et
seq.), as amended and corresponding
program regulations. Under Section 11
of the Act (7 U.S.C. 2020), State agencies
must maintain necessary records to
ascertain that SNAP is operating in
compliance with the Act and
regulations and must make these
records available to the Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) for inspection
and audit.
Management Evaluation (ME) Review
Schedules—Unless the State receives
approval for an alternative Management
Evaluation review schedule, each State
agency is required, under 7 CFR part
275, to submit one review schedule
every one, two or three years, depending
on the project area make-up of the State.
Data Analysis—Under 7 CFR part 275,
each State must establish a system for
analysis and evaluation of all data
available to the State. Data analysis and
evaluation is an ongoing process that
facilitates the development of effective
and prompt corrective action.
Corrective Action Plans—Under 7
CFR part 275, State agencies must
prepare a corrective action plan (CAP)
addressing identified deficiencies. The
State agencies must develop a system
for monitoring and evaluating corrective
Estimated
number of
respondents
Respondent
Responses
annually per
respondent/
reviews
action and submit CAP updates, as
necessary.
Affected Public: SNAP State and local
agencies.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 53
State agencies.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: (1) State agencies will
submit one review schedule and one ME
review plan per year, and will conduct
and document ME reviews for an
average total of 28.98 responses each.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
1,536 (53 review schedules + 53 review
plan development + 1,430 project areas)
Estimated Time per Response: FNS
estimates that it takes 4 hours to prepare
a review schedule, and that each of the
53 State agencies will submit one
review schedule per year resulting in a
total burden of 212 hours. FNS
estimates that it takes on average
approximately 80 hours to develop a
comprehensive State review plan,
resulting in a total of 4,240 hours.
FNS estimates that it takes an average
of 340 hours to conduct a review. It is
estimated that ME reviews are
conducted for one-half of the total
number of project areas (1,430).
Therefore, FNS estimates that it takes
approximately 486,200 hours annually
for State agencies to conduct their
reviews.
FNS also estimates that the time
necessary for record keeping, that is, the
time necessary to find and file a record
in the conduct of an ME review is .1169
hours per State agency. Therefore, the
total amount of time for recordkeeping
is 180 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Reporting
and Recordkeeping Burden: 490,832
hours
Total annual
responses
(col. b × c)
Estimated
average
number of
hours per
response
Estimated
total hours
(col. d × e)
Reporting Burden
State and local agencies review schedule ..........................
State and Local review plan development ..........................
State and Local agencies conducting reviews .............
53
53
53
1
1
26.98
53
53
1,429.94
4
80
340
212
4,240
486,179.60
Total Reporting Burden ................................................
53
........................
1,536
........................
490,631.6
Recordkeeping Burden
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
State and local agencies .....................................................
53
28.98
1,536
.1169
179.56
Total Recordkeeping Burden ........................................
53
........................
1,536
........................
180
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Jan 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM
16JAN1
3396
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2013 / Notices
Dated: January 10, 2013.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–00823 Filed 1–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–601]
Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts
Thereof, Finished and Unfinished,
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2010–2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 10, 2012, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published the
preliminary results of, and intent to
rescind in part, the 2010–2011
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on tapered
roller bearings (‘‘TRBs’’) from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1
Further, the Department released the
results of its post-preliminary analysis
on December 7, 2012.2 The period of
review (‘‘POR’’) is June 1, 2010, through
May 31, 2011.
This review covers five respondents:
(1) Changshan Peer Bearing Company,
Ltd. (‘‘CPZ/SKF’’); (2) Xiang Yang
Automobile Bearing Co., Ltd. (‘‘ZXY’’);
(3) Tianshui Hailin Import and Export
Corporation (‘‘Tianshui Hailin’’); (4)
Haining Automann Parts Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Haining Automann’’); and (5) Zhejiang
Zhaofeng Mechanical and Electronic
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Zhejiang Zhaofeng’’).
We invited interested parties to
comment on our Preliminary Results
and post-preliminary analysis. Based on
our analysis of the comments received,
we made certain changes to our margin
calculations for CPZ/SKF. The final
weighted-average dumping margins for
this review are listed in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section below.
DATES: Effective Date: January 16, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brandon Farlander or Erin Kearney, AD/
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
AGENCY:
1 See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof,
Finished or Unfinished, From the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Results of the 2010–2011
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Rescission In Part, and Intent To Rescind in Part,
77 FR 40579 (July 10, 2012) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 See Memorandum from Abdelali Elouaradia,
Office Director, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration, ‘‘Administrative Review
of Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof,
Finished or Unfinished from the People’s Republic
of China: Post-Preliminary Targeted Dumping
Analysis Memorandum,’’ dated December 7, 2012.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Jan 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0182 or (202) 482–
0167, respectively.
Background
On July 10, 2012, the Department
published its Preliminary Results in the
antidumping duty administrative review
of TRBs from the PRC. The Timken
Company (‘‘Petitioner’’) submitted postpreliminary surrogate value data on July
30, 2012. Petitioner and CPZ/SKF each
submitted case briefs on August 9, 2012,
and rebuttal briefs on August 14, 2012.
On October 17, 2012, the Department
extended the deadline for the final
results by 60 days, until January 6, 2013.
On October 31, 2012, as explained in
the memorandum from the Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, the
Department exercised its discretion to
toll deadlines for the duration of the
closure of the Federal Government from
October 29, through October 30, 2012,
which extended the deadline for the
final results by two additional days,
until January 8, 2013.3 On December 7,
2012, the Department released its postpreliminary analysis, and Petitioner and
CPZ/SKF submitted post-preliminary
comments on December 14, 2012, and
post-preliminary rebuttal comments on
December 18, 2012.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs as well as the postpreliminary comments and rebuttal
comments filed by parties in this review
are addressed in the Memorandum from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Tapered Roller Bearings and
Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished
from the People’s Republic of China,’’
dated concurrently with this notice
(‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
A list of the issues that parties raised
and to which we responded in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum
follows as an appendix to this notice.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in this review and
the corresponding recommendations in
3 See Memorandum to the Record from Paul
Piquado, AS for Import Administration, regarding
‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of
the Government Closure During the Recent
Hurricane,’’ dated October 31, 2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the public memorandum, which is on
file electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’). Access to IA ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit room
7046 of the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Period of Review
The POR is June 1, 2010, through May
31, 2011.
Scope of the Order
Imports covered by the order are
shipments of tapered roller bearings and
parts thereof, finished and unfinished,
from the PRC; flange, take up cartridge,
and hanger units incorporating tapered
roller bearings; and tapered roller
housings (except pillow blocks)
incorporating tapered rollers, with or
without spindles, whether or not for
automotive use. These products are
currently classifiable under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) item numbers 8482.20.00,
8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15, 8482.99.45,
8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.30.80,
8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.80,
8708.99.80.15 4 and 8708.99.80.80.5
Although the HTSUS item numbers are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
PRC-Wide Entity
The Department initiated a review of
Haining Automann and Zhejiang
Zhaofeng but neither company provided
a separate rate application. Because
these companies do not already have
separate rates, they remain part of the
PRC-wide entity in this review.
Accordingly, the PRC-wide entity is
under review for these final results.
In NME proceedings, ‘rates’ may
consist of a single dumping margin
4 Effective January 1, 2007, the HTSUS
subheading 8708.99.8015 is renumbered as
8708.99.8115. See United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘USITC’’) publication entitled,
‘‘Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States Under Section 1206 of the
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988,’’
USITC Publication 3898 (December 2006) found at
https://www.usitc.gov.
5 Effective January 1, 2007, the HTSUS
subheading 8708.99.8080 is renumbered as
8708.99.8180; see id.
E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM
16JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3394-3396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00823]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request--Performance Reporting System, Management Evaluation
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on this proposed information collection. This is a revision of a
currently approved collection under OMB 0584-0010, which is due to
expire April 30, 2013.
[[Page 3395]]
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 18, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions that were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to: Billy DeLancey, Food and Nutrition
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room
8-44, Alexandria, VA 22302.
Comments may also be submitted via fax to the attention of Billy
DeLancey at 703-305-2486 or via email to Billy.DeLancey@fns.usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for
submitting comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will
be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection should be directed to Billy
DeLancey at 703-305-2480.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Performance Reporting System, Management Evaluation.
OMB Number: 0584-0010.
Expiration Date: 4/30/2013.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Abstract: The purpose of the Performance Reporting System (PRS) is
to ensure that each State agency and project area is operating the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in accordance with the
requirements of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (the Act) (7 U.S.C.
2011, et seq.), as amended and corresponding program regulations. Under
Section 11 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 2020), State agencies must maintain
necessary records to ascertain that SNAP is operating in compliance
with the Act and regulations and must make these records available to
the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) for inspection and audit.
Management Evaluation (ME) Review Schedules--Unless the State
receives approval for an alternative Management Evaluation review
schedule, each State agency is required, under 7 CFR part 275, to
submit one review schedule every one, two or three years, depending on
the project area make-up of the State.
Data Analysis--Under 7 CFR part 275, each State must establish a
system for analysis and evaluation of all data available to the State.
Data analysis and evaluation is an ongoing process that facilitates the
development of effective and prompt corrective action.
Corrective Action Plans--Under 7 CFR part 275, State agencies must
prepare a corrective action plan (CAP) addressing identified
deficiencies. The State agencies must develop a system for monitoring
and evaluating corrective action and submit CAP updates, as necessary.
Affected Public: SNAP State and local agencies.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 53 State agencies.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: (1) State agencies
will submit one review schedule and one ME review plan per year, and
will conduct and document ME reviews for an average total of 28.98
responses each.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: 1,536 (53 review schedules + 53
review plan development + 1,430 project areas)
Estimated Time per Response: FNS estimates that it takes 4 hours to
prepare a review schedule, and that each of the 53 State agencies will
submit one review schedule per year resulting in a total burden of 212
hours. FNS estimates that it takes on average approximately 80 hours to
develop a comprehensive State review plan, resulting in a total of
4,240 hours.
FNS estimates that it takes an average of 340 hours to conduct a
review. It is estimated that ME reviews are conducted for one-half of
the total number of project areas (1,430).
Therefore, FNS estimates that it takes approximately 486,200 hours
annually for State agencies to conduct their reviews.
FNS also estimates that the time necessary for record keeping, that
is, the time necessary to find and file a record in the conduct of an
ME review is .1169 hours per State agency. Therefore, the total amount
of time for recordkeeping is 180 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden: 490,832
hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Responses Estimated
Estimated annually per Total annual average number Estimated
Respondent number of respondent/ responses of hours per total hours
respondents reviews (col. b x c) response (col. d x e)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State and local agencies review 53 1 53 4 212
schedule.......................
State and Local review plan 53 1 53 80 4,240
development....................
State and Local agencies 53 26.98 1,429.94 340 486,179.60
conducting reviews.........
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Reporting Burden...... 53 .............. 1,536 .............. 490,631.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State and local agencies........ 53 28.98 1,536 .1169 179.56
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Recordkeeping Burden.. 53 .............. 1,536 .............. 180
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 3396]]
Dated: January 10, 2013.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-00823 Filed 1-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
