Filiquarian Publishing, LLC; Choice Level, LLC; and Joshua Linsk; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment, 3425-3427 [2013-00744]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2013 / Notices
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Ocean Transportation Intermediary
License Revocations
The Commission gives notice that the
following Ocean Transportation
Intermediary licenses have been
revoked pursuant to section 19 of the
Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40101)
effective on the date shown.
License No.: 013253N.
Name: Total Service Line Corporation
dba Total Shipping Line Corp.
Address: 12140 East Artestia Blvd.,
Suite 208, Artesia, CA 90701.
Date Revoked: November 11, 2012.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 017580N.
Name: E-Trans Logistic Services, Inc.
Address: 17595 Almahurst Road,
Suite 211, City of Industry, CA 91748.
Date Revoked: November 18, 2012.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 020933N.
Name: Surexpress, Inc.
Address: 7040 Motz Street,
Paramount, CA 90723.
Date Revoked: November 5, 2012.
Reason: Voluntary Surrender of
License.
License No.: 021296NF.
Name: ITW International, Inc.
Address: 2889 Plaza Del Amo, #312,
Torrance, CA 90503.
Date Revoked: November 5, 2012.
Reason: Voluntary Surrender of
License.
Vern W. Hill,
Director, Bureau of Certification and
Licensing.
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than January
31, 2013.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
(Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice
President) 230 South LaSalle Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60690–1414:
1. Robert M. Wrobel Trust, Mr. Robert
Wrobel, Glencoe, Illinois, as Trustee; the
Debra Wrobel Trust, Debra Wrobel,
Glencoe, Illinois, as Trustee; three
related Wrobel Family Trusts, Debra
Wrobel, Glencoe, Illinois, as Trustee;
and Dr. Jack Havdala, Jonesboro,
Arkansas; as a group acting in concert,
to acquire at least 25 percent of the
voting shares of Amalgamated
Investments Company, and thereby
indirectly acquire voting shares of
Amalgamated Bank of Chicago, both in
Chicago, Illinois.
2. Stanley Dickson, Jr., Gross Pointe
Park, Michigan, as an individual, and
the group consisting of Stanley Dickson,
Jr., Gross Pointe Park, Michigan; Steven
Dickson, Rancho Santa Fe, California;
Kathryn J. Dickson, Howell, Michigan;
and Riddle Limited Partnership, Howell,
Michigan; to acquire voting shares of
FNBH Bancorp, Inc., and thereby
indirectly acquire voting shares of First
National Bank in Howell, both in
Howell, Michigan.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice
President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas
City, Missouri 64198–0001:
1. Dalene M. Selko, Meade, Nebraska;
to acquire voting shares of Selko Banco,
Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire
voting shares of Bank of Mead, both in
Mead, Nebraska.
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than February 11,
2013.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
(Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 33
Liberty Street, New York, New York
10045–0001:
1. The Adirondack Trust Company
Employee Stock Ownership Trust,
Saratoga Springs, New York; to acquire
50 additional shares of 473 Broadway
Holding Corporation, and 2,000
additional shares of The Adirondack
Trust Company, both in Saratoga
Springs, New York.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, January 11, 2013.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2013–00768 Filed 1–15–13; 8:45 am]
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, January 11, 2013.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
[FR Doc. 2013–00769 Filed 1–15–13; 8:45 am]
[File No. 112 3195]
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or
Bank Holding Company
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
[FR Doc. 2013–00832 Filed 1–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
3425
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank
or bank holding company. The factors
that are considered in acting on the
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of
the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the offices of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Jan 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Filiquarian Publishing, LLC; Choice
Level, LLC; and Joshua Linsk;
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order
To Aid Public Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed Consent Agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
federal law prohibiting unfair or
deceptive acts or practices or unfair
methods of competition. The attached
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes both the allegations in the
draft complaint and the terms of the
consent order—embodied in the consent
agreement—that would settle these
allegations.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM
16JAN1
3426
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2013 / Notices
Comments must be received on
or before February 11, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment at https://ftcpublic.comment
works.com/ftc/filiquarianconsent online
or on paper, by following the
instructions in the Request for Comment
part of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section below. Write ‘‘Filiquarian, File
No. 112 3195’’ on your comment and
file your comment online at https://ftc
public.commentworks.com/ftc/fili
quarianconsent by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail or deliver your comment to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex D), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Lyon (202–326–2344), FTC,
Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
consent agreement containing a consent
order to cease and desist, having been
filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period
of thirty (30) days. The following
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes the terms of the consent
agreement, and the allegations in the
complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement
package can be obtained from the FTC
Home Page (for January 10, 2013), on
the World Wide Web, at https://
www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm. A paper
copy can be obtained from the FTC
Public Reference Room, Room 130–H,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20580, either in person
or by calling (202) 326–2222.
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before February 11, 2013. Write
‘‘Filiquarian, File No. 112 3195’’ on
your comment. Your comment—
including your name and your state—
will be placed on the public record of
this proceeding, including, to the extent
practicable, on the public Commission
Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of
discretion, the Commission tries to
remove individuals’ home contact
information from comments before
placing them on the Commission Web
site.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Jan 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
Because your comment will be made
public, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive personal
information, like anyone’s Social
Security number, date of birth, driver’
license number or other state
identification number or foreign country
equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive health
information, like medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, do not include
any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which * * * is
privileged or confidential,’’ as discussed
in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include
competitively sensitive information
such as costs, sales statistics,
inventories, formulas, patterns, devices,
manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
If you want the Commission to give
your comment confidential treatment,
you must file it in paper form, with a
request for confidential treatment, and
you have to follow the procedure
explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).1 Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General
Counsel, in his or her sole discretion,
grants your request in accordance with
the law and the public interest.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online. To make sure that the
Commission considers your online
comment, you must file it at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/fili
quarianconsent by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also
may file a comment through that Web
site.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ‘‘Filiquarian, File No. 112 3195’’
on your comment and on the envelope,
and mail or deliver it to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, Room H–113
(Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20580. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
1 In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must
include the factual and legal basis for the request,
and must identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public record. See
FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Visit the Commission Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice
and the news release describing it. The
FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before February 11, 2013. You can find
more information, including routine
uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
the Commission’s privacy policy, at
https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis of Agreement Containing
Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has
accepted, subject to final approval, an
agreement containing a consent order
from Filiquarian Publishing, LLC;
Choice Level, LLC; and Joshua Linsk,
individually, and as an officer of the
companies.
The proposed consent order has been
placed on the public record for thirty
(30) days for receipt of comments by
interested persons. Comments received
during this period will become part of
the public record. After thirty (30) days,
the Commission will again review the
agreement and the comments received,
and will decide whether it should
withdraw from the agreement and take
appropriate action or make final the
agreement’s proposed order.
The Commission’s proposed
administrative complaint alleges that
the companies were operating as
consumer reporting agencies without
any procedures or policies in place to
comply with the Fair Credit Reporting
Act (‘‘FCRA’’).
The respondents sold background
screening reports containing criminal
records through mobile applications
(‘‘apps’’) available in the iTunes and
Google Android store (now GooglePlay)
and through a Web site. Filiquarian
developed and marketed apps that sold
for $0.99 each and allowed purchasers
to conduct unlimited searches of
criminal history information within a
specific geographic area, such as a state
or county. Each app included an express
representation that purchasers could use
the reports for employment purposes.
Choice Level provided the underlying
records accessed by purchasers of the
Filiquarian apps. Joshua Linsk is the
owner and sole officer of Filiquarian
and Choice Level. During all times
material to this complaint, Linsk,
individually or in concert with others,
formulated, directed, or controlled the
policies, acts, or practices of the
companies.
E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM
16JAN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2013 / Notices
According to the complaint, despite
Filiquarian clearly promoting its
background reports for use in
employment screening, both Filiquarian
and Choice Level included disclaimers
in their terms and conditions stating
that their reports were not to be
considered a screening product for
insurance, employment, or credit, and
that they were not compliant with the
FCRA. Such disclaimers contradicted
and failed to counteract the express
representations made in Filiquarian’s
advertising, urging the use of the reports
to screen potential employees.
Marketing and selling background
screening reports to potential employers
without implementing any of the
accuracy or dispute safeguards required
by the FCRA potentially exposes a large
number of consumers to harm to their
reputations and employment prospects.
The complaint alleges that the reports
produced by respondents were
consumer reports under the FCRA and
that respondents lacked any policies or
procedures to comply with the FCRA.
Specifically, the complaint alleges that
respondents failed to adhere to three
key requirements of the FCRA: to
maintain reasonable procedures to
verify who their users are and that the
information would be used for a
permissible purpose; to ensure that the
information they provided in consumer
reports was accurate; and to provide
notices to users and to those who
furnished proposed respondents with
information that was included in
consumer reports. The complaint
further alleges that by their violations of
the FCRA, as stated above, proposed
respondents have engaged in unfair and
deceptive acts and practices, in
violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(a).
The proposed consent order contains
provisions designed to prevent the
respondents from engaging in the future
in practices similar to those alleged in
the complaint.
Part I of the order includes injunctive
relief requiring respondents to comply
with the relevant provisions of the
FCRA. Parts II through VI are reporting
and compliance provisions. Part II
requires respondents to retain
documents relating to their compliance
with the order for a five-year period.
Part III requires dissemination of the
order now and in the future to persons
with responsibilities relating to the
subject matter of the order. Part IV
ensures notification to the FTC of
changes in corporate status. Part V
mandates that respondents submit a
compliance report to the FTC within 60
days, and periodically thereafter as
requested. Part VI is a provision
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Jan 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
‘‘sunsetting’’ the order after twenty (20)
years, with certain exceptions.
The purpose of this analysis is to aid
public comment on the proposed order.
It is not intended to constitute an
official interpretation of the proposed
order or to modify its terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Richard C. Donohue,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–00744 Filed 1–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 121–0120]
Motorola Mobility LLC and Google Inc.;
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order
To Aid Public Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed consent agreement;
correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Trade
Commission published a document in
the Federal Register of January 11,
2013, requesting public comments on an
analysis of proposed consent order to
aid public comment. The document
inadvertently did not include the
Statement of the Commission. This
document contains the Statement of the
Commission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Feinstein or Pete Levitas (202–
326–2555), FTC, Bureau of Competition,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
SUMMARY:
Correction
In the Federal Register of January 11,
2013, in FR Doc. 2013–00465, on page
2402, the third column, second
paragraph (after ‘‘Richard C. Donohue,
Acting Secretary,’’ but before the
‘‘Statement of Commissioner Rosch,’’)
insert the following Statement of the
Commission:
Statement of the Federal Trade
Commission
The Federal Trade Commission has
today voted to issue for public comment
a Complaint and Order against Google
Inc. (‘‘Google’’) designed to remedy
Google’s allegedly anticompetitive
conduct resulting from breaches by
Google and its subsidiary Motorola
Mobility, Inc. (‘‘Motorola’’) of
Motorola’s commitments to license
standard-essential patents (‘‘SEPs’’) on
terms that are fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (‘‘FRAND’’).1 The
1 The licensing obligation in this matter was a
FRAND obligation, although RAND (reasonable and
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3427
Complaint alleges that, before its
acquisition by Google, Motorola reneged
on a licensing commitment made to
several standard-setting bodies to
license its standard-essential patents
relating to smartphones, tablet
computers, and video game systems on
FRAND terms by seeking injunctions
against willing licensees of those SEPs.2
This conduct tended to impair
competition in the market for these
important electronic devices—products
that over half of Americans own and use
daily, including iPhones, iPads and
Xboxes. After purchasing Motorola for
$12.5 billion in June 2012, Google
continued Motorola’s conduct. These
actions constitute unfair methods of
competition, as well as unfair acts and
practices, in violation of Section 5 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act, 15
U.S.C. 45.
Google’s settlement with the
Commission requires Google to
withdraw its claims for injunctive relief
on FRAND-encumbered SEPs around
the world, and to offer a FRAND license
to any company that wants to license
Google’s SEPs in the future. If accepted
by the Commission, the Proposed Order
may set a template for the resolution of
SEP licensing disputes across many
industries, and reduce the costly and
inefficient need for companies to amass
patents for purely defensive purposes in
industries where standard-compliant
products are the norm.
The Commission has a long history of
using its enforcement authority to
safeguard the integrity of the standardsetting process.3 Standard setting can
deliver substantial benefits to American
consumers, promoting innovation,
competition, and consumer choice. But
standard setting often supplants the
competitive process with the collective
decision-making of competitors,
requiring that we be vigilant in
protecting the integrity of the standardsetting process.4 Today’s Commission
non-discriminatory) licensing obligations raise
similar issues.
2 Commissioners Rosch and Ohlhausen do not
join this Statement (with Commissioner Ohlhausen
voting against the consent agreement) and have
issued separate statements expressing their views.
3 See In re Dell Computer Corp., 121 F.T.C. 616
(1996); In re Union Oil Company of California, 2004
FTC LEXIS 115 (July 7, 2004); In re Rambus, Inc.,
Dkt. No. 9302, 2006 FTC LEXIS 101 (Aug. 20, 2006),
rev’d, Rambus Inc. v. F.T.C., 522 F.3d 456 (DC Cir.
2008); In re Negotiated Data Solutions LLC, FTC
File No. 051–0094, Decision and Order (Jan. 23,
2008), available at https://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/
0510094/080122do.pdf; In re Robert Bosch GmbH,
FTC File N. 121–0081, Decision and Order (Nov. 26,
2012), available at https://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/
1210081/121126boschdo.pdf.
4 See, e.g., Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian
Head, Inc., 486 U.S. 492, 500–01 (1988) (noting that
E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM
Continued
16JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3425-3427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00744]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 112 3195]
Filiquarian Publishing, LLC; Choice Level, LLC; and Joshua Linsk;
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or
practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to
Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft
complaint and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent
agreement--that would settle these allegations.
[[Page 3426]]
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 11, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/filiquarianconsent online or on paper,
by following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``Filiquarian, File No.
112 3195'' on your comment and file your comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/filiquarianconsent by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment
on paper, mail or deliver your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex
D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Lyon (202-326-2344), FTC,
Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34,
notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement
containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with
and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The
following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the
consent agreement, and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic
copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained
from the FTC Home Page (for January 10, 2013), on the World Wide Web,
at https://www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm. A paper copy can be obtained
from the FTC Public Reference Room, Room 130-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-
2222.
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before February 11,
2013. Write ``Filiquarian, File No. 112 3195'' on your comment. Your
comment--including your name and your state--will be placed on the
public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable,
on the public Commission Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of discretion, the Commission tries to
remove individuals' home contact information from comments before
placing them on the Commission Web site.
Because your comment will be made public, you are solely
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any
sensitive personal information, like anyone's Social Security number,
date of birth, driver' license number or other state identification
number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any
sensitive health information, like medical records or other
individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not
include any ``[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information
which * * * is privileged or confidential,'' as discussed in Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include competitively sensitive
information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.
If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential
treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for
confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure explained
in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).\1\ Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole
discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must include the factual and
legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions
of the comment to be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule
4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit
your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your
online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/filiquarianconsent by following the instructions on the web-based
form. If this Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov/#!home, you
also may file a comment through that Web site.
If you file your comment on paper, write ``Filiquarian, File No.
112 3195'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail or deliver it
to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20580. If possible, submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight service.
Visit the Commission Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this
Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws
that the Commission administers permit the collection of public
comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that
it receives on or before February 11, 2013. You can find more
information, including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
the Commission's privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has accepted, subject to final
approval, an agreement containing a consent order from Filiquarian
Publishing, LLC; Choice Level, LLC; and Joshua Linsk, individually, and
as an officer of the companies.
The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for
thirty (30) days for receipt of comments by interested persons.
Comments received during this period will become part of the public
record. After thirty (30) days, the Commission will again review the
agreement and the comments received, and will decide whether it should
withdraw from the agreement and take appropriate action or make final
the agreement's proposed order.
The Commission's proposed administrative complaint alleges that the
companies were operating as consumer reporting agencies without any
procedures or policies in place to comply with the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (``FCRA'').
The respondents sold background screening reports containing
criminal records through mobile applications (``apps'') available in
the iTunes and Google Android store (now GooglePlay) and through a Web
site. Filiquarian developed and marketed apps that sold for $0.99 each
and allowed purchasers to conduct unlimited searches of criminal
history information within a specific geographic area, such as a state
or county. Each app included an express representation that purchasers
could use the reports for employment purposes. Choice Level provided
the underlying records accessed by purchasers of the Filiquarian apps.
Joshua Linsk is the owner and sole officer of Filiquarian and Choice
Level. During all times material to this complaint, Linsk, individually
or in concert with others, formulated, directed, or controlled the
policies, acts, or practices of the companies.
[[Page 3427]]
According to the complaint, despite Filiquarian clearly promoting
its background reports for use in employment screening, both
Filiquarian and Choice Level included disclaimers in their terms and
conditions stating that their reports were not to be considered a
screening product for insurance, employment, or credit, and that they
were not compliant with the FCRA. Such disclaimers contradicted and
failed to counteract the express representations made in Filiquarian's
advertising, urging the use of the reports to screen potential
employees. Marketing and selling background screening reports to
potential employers without implementing any of the accuracy or dispute
safeguards required by the FCRA potentially exposes a large number of
consumers to harm to their reputations and employment prospects.
The complaint alleges that the reports produced by respondents were
consumer reports under the FCRA and that respondents lacked any
policies or procedures to comply with the FCRA. Specifically, the
complaint alleges that respondents failed to adhere to three key
requirements of the FCRA: to maintain reasonable procedures to verify
who their users are and that the information would be used for a
permissible purpose; to ensure that the information they provided in
consumer reports was accurate; and to provide notices to users and to
those who furnished proposed respondents with information that was
included in consumer reports. The complaint further alleges that by
their violations of the FCRA, as stated above, proposed respondents
have engaged in unfair and deceptive acts and practices, in violation
of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(a).
The proposed consent order contains provisions designed to prevent
the respondents from engaging in the future in practices similar to
those alleged in the complaint.
Part I of the order includes injunctive relief requiring
respondents to comply with the relevant provisions of the FCRA. Parts
II through VI are reporting and compliance provisions. Part II requires
respondents to retain documents relating to their compliance with the
order for a five-year period. Part III requires dissemination of the
order now and in the future to persons with responsibilities relating
to the subject matter of the order. Part IV ensures notification to the
FTC of changes in corporate status. Part V mandates that respondents
submit a compliance report to the FTC within 60 days, and periodically
thereafter as requested. Part VI is a provision ``sunsetting'' the
order after twenty (20) years, with certain exceptions.
The purpose of this analysis is to aid public comment on the
proposed order. It is not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the proposed order or to modify its terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Richard C. Donohue,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-00744 Filed 1-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P