Airworthiness Directives; GROB-WERKE Airplanes, 2910-2912 [2013-00667]
Download as PDF
2910
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the marketing order. In addition, the
Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Florida citrus
industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the July 17, 2012, meeting was
a public meeting and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit comments
on this proposed rule, including the
regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189 Generic
Fruit Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
Florida citrus handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at
the previously-mentioned address in the
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 10-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. Ten days is
deemed appropriate because: (1) The
2012–13 fiscal period began on August
1, 2012, and the marketing order
requires that the rate of assessment for
each fiscal period apply to all assessable
citrus handled during such fiscal
period; (2) the Committee needs to have
sufficient funds to pay its expenses
which are incurred on a continuous
basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jan 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
action which was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past
years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 905
Grapefruit, Oranges, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tangelos,
Tangerines.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 905 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 905—ORANGES, GRAPEFRUIT,
TANGERINES, AND TANGELOS
GROWN IN FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 905 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 905.235 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 905.235
Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2012, an
assessment rate of $0.008 per 4⁄5 bushel
carton or equivalent is established for
Florida citrus covered under the order.
Dated: January 9, 2013.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–00599 Filed 1–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0013; Directorate
Identifier 2012–CE–046–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; GROB–
WERKE Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for GROB–
WERKE Model G115EG airplanes. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as cracks in the
elevator trim tab arms on several Grob
G 115 airplanes, which could result in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
failure of the part and consequent loss
of control. We are issuing this proposed
AD to require actions to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Grob Aircraft
AG, Lettenbachstrasse 9, D–86874
Tussenhausen-Mattsies, Germany;
phone: +49 (0) 8268 998 139; fax: +49
(0) 8268 998 200; email:
productsupport@grob-aircraft.de;
Internet: www.grob-aircraft.com/
index.php/g-115e.html. You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call (816) 329–4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Taylor Martin, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4138; fax: (816) 329–4090; email:
taylor.martin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM
15JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2013–0013; Directorate Identifier
2012–CE–046–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued AD No. 2012–
0155, dated August 20, 2012 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
On several Grob G 115 aeroplanes, elevator
trim tab arms Part Number (P/N) 115E–3758
have been found cracked, from a rear
mounting hole (either L/H or R/H) to the rear
edge of the trim tab arm.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to further crack
propagation, possibly resulting in failure of
the part and consequent loss of control of the
aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires repetitive inspections of the elevator
trim tab arm to detect cracks and, if detected,
replacement of the part with a serviceable
part.
This AD also provides an optional
terminating action for the repetitive
inspections.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Relevant Service Information
Grob Aircraft has issued Service
Bulletin No. MSB1078–186/3, dated
August 3, 2012. The actions described
in this service information are intended
to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jan 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 0 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $372 per
product.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $627 per product.
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2911
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
Grob-Werke: Docket No. FAA–2012–0013;
Directorate Identifier 2012–CE–046–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 1,
2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to GROB–WERKE G115EG
airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in
any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 55: Stabilizers.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by the discovery of
cracks in the elevator trim tab arms on
several Grob G 115 airplanes, which could
result in failure of the part and consequent
loss of control. We are issuing this proposed
AD to detect cracks and prevent the part from
failing.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, do the following
actions following Grob Aircraft Service
Bulletin No. MSB1078–186/3, dated August
3, 2012.
(1) Within the next 50 hours time-inservice (TIS) after the effective date of this
AD and repetitively thereafter at intervals not
to exceed 200 hours TIS, inspect elevator
trim tab arms, part number (P/N) 115E–3758,
using a nondestructive testing (NDT) method
such as a dye-penetrant or eddy-current.
Note for paragraph (f)(1) of this AD: There
must be a more significant nondestructive
testing (NDT) method of inspection beyond a
visual inspection to accomplish the
inspection requirements in paragraph (f)(1) of
this AD.
(2) If during any inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD a crack is found,
before further flight, replace the affected
elevator trim tab arm with an airworthy part.
E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM
15JAP1
2912
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(3) Replacement at any time of an elevator
trim tab arm with an airworthy part that has
a P/N other than P/N 115E–3758, will
terminate the repetitive requirement in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(g) Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
This AD provides credit for the actions
required in this AD if already done before the
effective date of this AD following Grob
Aircraft Service Bulletin No. MSB1078–186/
2, dated March 28, 2012; Grob Aircraft
Service Bulletin No. MSB1078–186/1, dated
March 8, 2012; or Grob Aircraft Service
Bulletin No. MSB1078–186, dated February
15, 2012.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
(h) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Taylor Martin, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4138; fax: (816) 329–
4090; email: taylor.martin@faa.gov. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, a federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
(i) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD No.: 2012–0155, dated
August 20, 2012; and Grob Aircraft Service
Bulletin No. MSB1078–186/3, dated August
3, 2012, for related information. For service
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jan 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
information related to this AD, contact Grob
Aircraft AG, Lettenbachstrasse 9, D–86874
Tussenhausen-Mattsies, Germany; phone:
+49 (0) 8268 998 139; fax: +49 (0) 8268 998
200; email: productsupport@grob-aircraft.de;
Internet: www.grob-aircraft.com/index.php/g115e.html. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January
8, 2013.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–00667 Filed 1–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 121
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0929; Notice No. 13–
02]
RIN 2120–AJ17
Prohibition on Personal Use of
Electronic Devices on the Flight Deck
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The proposed rule would
prohibit flightcrew members in
operations under part 121 from using a
personal wireless communications
device or laptop computer for personal
use while at their duty station on the
flight deck while the aircraft is being
operated. This rule, which conforms
FAA regulations with recent legislation,
is intended to ensure that certain nonessential activities do not contribute to
the challenge of task management on the
flight deck or a loss of situational
awareness due to attention to nonessential tasks.
DATES: Send comments on or before
March 18, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2012–0929
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions concerning this
proposed rule, contact Nancy Lauck
Claussen, Air Transportation Division
(AFS–200), Flight Standards Service,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–8166; email
Nancy.L.Claussen@faa.gov.
For legal questions concerning this
action, contact Nancy Sanchez, Office of
the Chief Counsel, Regulations Division,
AGC–200, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267–3073; email
Nancy.Sanchez@faa.gov.
See the
‘‘Additional Information’’ section for
information on how to comment on this
proposal and how the FAA will handle
comments received. The ‘‘Additional
Information’’ section also contains
related information about the docket,
privacy, the handling of proprietary or
confidential business information. In
addition, there is information on
obtaining copies of related rulemaking
documents.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules on
aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the
United States Code. Subtitle I, Section
E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM
15JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 15, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2910-2912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00667]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0013; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-046-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; GROB-WERKE Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
GROB-WERKE Model G115EG airplanes. This proposed AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an
aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as cracks in the elevator trim tab arms on several Grob G 115
airplanes, which could result in failure of the part and consequent
loss of control. We are issuing this proposed AD to require actions to
address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Grob Aircraft AG, Lettenbachstrasse 9, D-86874 Tussenhausen-Mattsies,
Germany; phone: +49 (0) 8268 998 139; fax: +49 (0) 8268 998 200; email:
productsupport@grob-aircraft.de; Internet: www.grob-aircraft.com/index.php/g-115e.html. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Taylor Martin, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4138; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
taylor.martin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments
[[Page 2911]]
to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No.
FAA-2013-0013; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-046-AD'' at the beginning
of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this
proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date
and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No. 2012-0155, dated August 20, 2012 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:
On several Grob G 115 aeroplanes, elevator trim tab arms Part
Number (P/N) 115E-3758 have been found cracked, from a rear mounting
hole (either L/H or R/H) to the rear edge of the trim tab arm.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
further crack propagation, possibly resulting in failure of the part
and consequent loss of control of the aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this AD requires repetitive
inspections of the elevator trim tab arm to detect cracks and, if
detected, replacement of the part with a serviceable part.
This AD also provides an optional terminating action for the
repetitive inspections.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Grob Aircraft has issued Service Bulletin No. MSB1078-186/3, dated
August 3, 2012. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 0 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 3 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $372 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $627 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Grob-Werke: Docket No. FAA-2012-0013; Directorate Identifier 2012-
CE-046-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 1, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to GROB-WERKE G115EG airplanes, all serial
numbers, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 55: Stabilizers.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by the discovery of cracks in the elevator
trim tab arms on several Grob G 115 airplanes, which could result in
failure of the part and consequent loss of control. We are issuing
this proposed AD to detect cracks and prevent the part from failing.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, do the following actions following Grob
Aircraft Service Bulletin No. MSB1078-186/3, dated August 3, 2012.
(1) Within the next 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the
effective date of this AD and repetitively thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 200 hours TIS, inspect elevator trim tab arms, part
number (P/N) 115E-3758, using a nondestructive testing (NDT) method
such as a dye-penetrant or eddy-current.
Note for paragraph (f)(1) of this AD: There must be a more
significant nondestructive testing (NDT) method of inspection beyond
a visual inspection to accomplish the inspection requirements in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(2) If during any inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of
this AD a crack is found, before further flight, replace the
affected elevator trim tab arm with an airworthy part.
[[Page 2912]]
(3) Replacement at any time of an elevator trim tab arm with an
airworthy part that has a P/N other than P/N 115E-3758, will
terminate the repetitive requirement in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(g) Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
This AD provides credit for the actions required in this AD if
already done before the effective date of this AD following Grob
Aircraft Service Bulletin No. MSB1078-186/2, dated March 28, 2012;
Grob Aircraft Service Bulletin No. MSB1078-186/1, dated March 8,
2012; or Grob Aircraft Service Bulletin No. MSB1078-186, dated
February 15, 2012.
(h) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Taylor Martin, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4138; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
taylor.martin@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
(i) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2012-0155, dated August 20, 2012; and Grob Aircraft Service Bulletin
No. MSB1078-186/3, dated August 3, 2012, for related information.
For service information related to this AD, contact Grob Aircraft
AG, Lettenbachstrasse 9, D-86874 Tussenhausen-Mattsies, Germany;
phone: +49 (0) 8268 998 139; fax: +49 (0) 8268 998 200; email:
productsupport@grob-aircraft.de; Internet: www.grob-aircraft.com/index.php/g-115e.html. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January 8, 2013.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-00667 Filed 1-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P