Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing the Blue-Throated Macaw, 2239-2249 [2013-00291]
Download as PDF
2239
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Where:
W = Breaking energy in inch-pounds (in-lb),
F = Force in pounds (lb), and
P = Penetration in inches (in).
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE II—MINIMUM STATIC BREAKING ENERGY
[Joules (J) and Inch-Pounds (in-lb)]
Tire characteristic
Motorcycle
Plunger diameter
(mm and inches)
7.94
mm
All 12 rim
diameter
code or
smaller
except
motorcycle
⁄ ″
5 16
Tubeless 17.5
rim diameter
code or
smaller and
light
truck
Tires other than light truck, motorcycle, 12 rim diameter
code or smaller
Tube type greater
than 12 rim
diameter code
Tubeless greater
than 17.5 rim
diameter code
19.05
mm
34
⁄ ″
19.05
mm
34
⁄ ″
31.75
mm
11⁄4″
38.10
mm
11⁄2″
31.75
mm
11⁄4″
38.10
mm
11⁄2″
Breaking energy
J
in-lb
J
in-lb
J
in-lb
J
in-lb
J
in-lb
J
in-lb
J
in-lb
Load Range:
A .....................................................
B .....................................................
C .....................................................
D .....................................................
E .....................................................
F .....................................................
G ....................................................
H .....................................................
J .....................................................
L .....................................................
M ....................................................
N .....................................................
16
33
45
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
150
300
400
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
67
135
203
271
338
406
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
600
1,200
1,800
2,400
3,000
3,600
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
225
293
361
514
576
644
711
768
..........
..........
..........
..........
2,000
2,600
3,200
4,550
5,100
5,700
6,300
6,800
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
768
892
1,412
1,785
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
............
............
6,800
7,900
12,500
15,800
............
............
............
............
............
............
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
2,282
2,598
2,824
3,050
3,220
3,389
............
............
............
............
............
............
20,200
23,000
25,000
27,000
28,500
30,000
..........
..........
576
734
971
1,412
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
............
............
5,100
6,500
8,600
12,500
............
............
............
............
............
............
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1,694
2,090
2,203
..........
..........
..........
............
............
............
............
............
............
15,000
18,500
19,500
............
............
............
Note: For rayon cord tires, applicable energy values are 60 percent of those in table.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued on: January 2, 2013.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2013–00315 Filed 1–9–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R9–ES–2012–0034; 450
003 0115]
RIN 1018–AY68
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Listing the Blue-Throated
Macaw
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
Proposed rule.
ACTION:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
list the blue-throated macaw (Ara
glaucogularis) as endangered under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). This species is endemic
to a small area in Bolivia, and there are
estimated to be fewer than 150
individuals remaining in the wild. Its
population continues to decrease
despite intense conservation efforts. The
primary threat to the species is lack of
reproductive success (loss of nestlings)
due to nest failure, which primarily is
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
caused by competition for nest sites and
predation by larger avian species, in
addition to diminished availability of
suitable habitat. We seek information
from the public on the proposed listing
for this species.
DATES: We will consider comments and
information received or postmarked on
or before March 11, 2013. We must
receive requests for a public hearing by
February 25, 2013. See Public Hearing
section under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit
information by one of the following
methods:
• Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search
field, enter FWS–R9–ES–2012–0034,
which is the docket number for this
action. Then click on the Search button.
You may submit a comment by clicking
on ‘‘Comment Now.’’ If your comments
will fit in the provided comment box,
please use this feature of https://
www.regulations.gov, as it is most
compatible with our comment review
procedures. If you attach your
comments as a separate document, our
preferred file format is Microsoft Word.
If you attach multiple comments (such
as form letters), our preferred format is
a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel.
• By hard copy: U.S. mail or handdelivery: Public Comments Processing,
Attn: FWS–R9–ES–2012–0034, Division
of Policy and Directives Management;
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Fairfax Drive, MS 2042–PDM;
Arlington, VA 22203.
We will not accept comments by email
or fax. We will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us
(see the Information Requested section,
below, for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janine Van Norman, Chief, Branch of
Foreign Species, Endangered Species
Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 420,
Arlington, VA 22203; telephone 703–
358–2171. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Requested
We intend that any final actions
resulting from this proposed rule be
based on the best scientific and
commercial data available. Therefore,
we request comments or information
from the Government of Bolivia, the
scientific community, or any other
interested parties concerning this
proposed rule. We particularly seek
clarifying information concerning:
(1) Information on taxonomy,
distribution, habitat selection and
trends (especially breeding and foraging
habitats), diet, and population
abundance and trends (especially
current recruitment data) of this species.
(2) Information on the effects of
habitat loss and changing land uses on
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
2240
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
the distribution and abundance of this
species and its principal food sources
over the short and long term.
(3) Information on whether changing
climatic conditions (i.e., increasing
intensity of storms or drought) are
affecting the species, its habitat, or its
food sources.
(4) Information on the effects of other
potential threat factors, including live
capture and collection, predation by
other animals, and diseases of this
species or its principal food sources
over the short and long term.
(5) Information on management
programs for its conservation, including
mitigation measures related to
conservation programs, and any other
private or governmental conservation
programs that benefit this species.
(6) Genetics and taxonomy.
(7) The factors that are the basis for
making a listing determination for a
species under section 4(a) of the Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are:
(a) The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
(b) Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes;
(c) Disease or predation;
(d) The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or
(e) Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence.
Please include sufficient information
with your submission (such as full
references) to allow us to verify any
scientific or commercial information
you include. Submissions merely stating
support for or opposition to the action
under consideration without providing
supporting information, although noted,
will not be considered in making a
determination. Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the
Act directs that determinations as to
whether any species is an endangered or
threatened species must be made
‘‘solely on the basis of the best scientific
and commercial data available.’’
Previous Federal Actions
On May 6, 1991, we received a
petition (1991 petition) from Alison
Stattersfield, of the International
Council for Bird Preservation (ICBP), to
list 53 foreign birds under the Act,
including the blue-throated macaw,
which is the subject of this proposed
rule. We took several actions on this
petition. On December 16, 1991, we
made a positive 90-day finding and
announced the initiation of a status
review of the species included in the
1991 petition (56 FR 65207, published
December 16, 1991). On March 28, 1994
(59 FR 14496), we published a 12-month
finding on the 1991 petition. In that
document, we announced our finding
that listing 38 species from the 1991
petition, including the blue-throated
macaw, was warranted but precluded
because of other listing actions. The
blue-throated macaw was assigned a
listing priority number (LPN) of 2.
Species are assigned LPNs based on the
magnitude and immediacy of threats, as
well as their taxonomic status. The
lower the LPN, the higher priority that
species is for us to determine
appropriate action using our available
resources. An LPN of 2 reflects threats
that are both imminent and high in
magnitude, as well as the taxonomic
classification of the blue-throated
macaw as a full species.
Previously published petition
findings, listing rules, status reviews,
and petition finding reviews that
included foreign species are listed in the
Annual Notice of Review (ANOR) that
published on May 3, 2011 (76 FR
25150). In our ANORs, we announce our
annual petition findings for foreign
species, as required under section
4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Act. When, in
response to a petition, we find that
listing a species is warranted but
precluded by higher priority listing
actions, we must review the status of the
species each year until we publish a
proposed rule or make a determination
that listing is not warranted. These
subsequent status reviews and the
Public Hearing
accompanying 12-month findings are
At this time, we do not have a public
referred to as ‘‘resubmitted’’ petition
hearing scheduled for this proposed
findings. In the May 3, 2011, ANOR, we
rule. The main purpose of most public
announced that listing was warranted
hearings is to obtain public testimony or but precluded for 20 foreign species,
comment. In most cases, it is sufficient
including the blue-throated macaw,
to submit comments through the Federal which is the subject of this proposed
eRulemaking Portal, described above in
rule. Additional information on this
the ADDRESSES section. If you would like species may be found in that ANOR.
to request a public hearing for this
Background
proposed rule, you must submit your
Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs
request, in writing, to the person listed
that determinations as to whether any
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
species is an endangered or threatened
CONTACT section by the date specified
species must be made ‘‘solely on the
above in DATES.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
basis of the best scientific and
commercial data available.’’
In this document, we propose to add
this species as endangered to the
Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife. Prior to issuing a
final determination on this proposed
action, we will take into consideration
all comments and any additional
information we receive. Such
information may lead to a final rule that
differs from this proposal. All comments
and recommendations, including names
and addresses of commenters, will
become part of the administrative
record.
Species Information
Taxonomy
The taxonomic status of this species
was disputed until fairly recently. The
blue-throated macaw was previously
considered an aberrant form of the blueand-yellow macaw (A. ararauna), but
these two species are known to occur
sympatrically (in the same location)
without interbreeding (Kyle 2007a; del
Hoyo et al. 1997). Common names in
Spanish for the blue-throated macaw
include guacamayo barba azul and
guacamayo caninde. Both BirdLife
International (BLI) and the Integrated
Taxonomic Information System (ITIS)
recognize the blue-throated macaw as
Ara glaucogularis. ITIS (www.itis.gov) is
a database maintained by a partnership
of U.S., Canadian, and Mexican federal
government agencies, other
organizations, and taxonomic specialists
to provide taxonomic information.
Therefore, we accept the species as Ara
glaucogularis.
Population
When the blue-throated macaw
population was investigated as of 1998,
the species was located in eight
locations and the population was
believed to be 100–150 individuals
´
(Loro Parque Fundacion (LPF) 2002, p.
13). The estimate provided by BirdLife
International indicates that the total
wild population is estimated to be 73–
87 mature individuals (BLI 2012), which
is a decrease from an estimate of
between 50 and 300 birds when our
previous ANOR was published. In
October 2004, a small new population
was found at Santa Rosa, 100 km (62 mi)
west of locations believed to be the
western-most edge of its range (LPF
2012; Herrera et al. 2007, p. 18).
Biologists surveying for this species in
2004 found more birds than in previous
surveys by searching specific habitat
types (palm groves and forested islands)
(Herrera et al. 2007, p. 18). In 2007, a
population of approximately 25
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
individuals was found one hour south
of Trinidad (Kyle 2007a, p. 6). Also in
2007, a flock of approximately 70 birds
´
was observed near the Rio Mamore
´
´
(Asociacion Armonıa), in the vicinity of
where the Barba Azul Nature Reserve is
now.
In and around the Barba Azul Nature
Reserve, there are believed to be
approximately 100 individuals (Herrera
2012, pers. comm.; Kingsbury et al.
2010, p. 70). Currently, experts working
locally with this species estimate that
there are between 115 and 250 birds
known to remain in the wild (Herrera
2012, pers. comm.; Gilardi 2012 pers.
comm.). LPF’s 2010 annual report (p.
15), stated that approximately 300
individuals were believed to remain in
the wild. However, this may be an
overestimate—the population found at
the Barba Azul Nature Reserve may be
the same birds that are monitored in the
southern and eastern parts of its range
during the breeding season; it is likely
the population is nearer to 115
individuals (Gilardi 2012 pers. comm.).
In captivity, more than over 1,000
individual blue-throated macaws are
likely held worldwide according to the
2011 North American Regional
Studbook (Anderson 2011, p. 4).
Species Description
Blue-throated macaws have a blue
throat, a bare, white face containing
identifiable blue-streaks, dark grey
irises, and a large black bill (Anderson
2011, p. 4; Kyle 2007b, p. 16). Its
forehead is also blue and there is a lack
of contrast between its remiges (large
flight feathers on the wing) and
upperwing coverts. This species is
approximately the same size (85 cm or
33 inches) as the blue-and-yellow
macaw. However, blue-throated macaws
are not as competitive as the blue-andyellow macaw in obtaining nesting
cavities (Kyle 2007a). Male bluethroated macaws are larger than females
at about 800 grams (1.76 pounds), and
females weigh approximately 600 grams
(1.32 pounds) (Kyle 2007b, p. 16).
Blue-throated macaws, like other
parrot species, are monogamous and
tend to mate for life. There is also a
significant investment in the care for
their young—blue-throated macaws are
not fully independent of their parents
for a full year (Berkunsky 2010, p. 5).
Therefore, some breeding pairs may not
produce nestlings every breeding
season. The blue-throated macaw forms
its nests in large tree cavities; its
´
preferred nesting tree is the motacu
palm (Attalea phalerata), which is
native to Bolivia, Brazil, and Peru. The
northern population of blue-throated
macaws breeds between August to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
November, and the southern population
breeds between November to March
(Berkunsky 2012 pers. comm.; Kyle
2007a). The southern population, an
hour south of Trinidad, tends to breed
around the same time as the more
commonly found blue-and-gold macaw.
This overlap of breeding seasons adds to
competition for nest sites. Blue-throated
macaws are sexually mature between 6
and 8 years (Strem 2008; Kyle 2007a, p.
6). Females lay one to three eggs per
clutch and incubate for 26 days. One to
three hatchlings are raised, depending
on food availability (BLI 2010; Kyle
2007a). Nestlings fledge between 13 and
14 weeks. Blue-throated macaws are
seen traveling mostly in pairs but also
have been seen in a large flock of
between 70 and 100 individuals
(Herrera 2012, pers. comm.; Macleod et
al. 2009, p. 15; Waugh 2007a, p. 53).
Diet
This species seeks areas where palm
fruits and suitable nesting cavities are
readily available (Herrera et al. 2007,
pp. 18–24). It feeds on fruits of
approximately 12 species of trees (Kyle
2007a, pp. 1–10). There are 84 species
of palms in Bolivia (Moraes et al. 2001,
p. 234) and approximately 11 palm
species within the blue-throated
macaw’s range. Blue-throated macaws
prefer the fleshy part of the fruit, or
´
mesocarp, of motacu, Mauritia flexuosa
´
(royal palms or carandai-guazu), and
Acrocomia aculeata (common names
include: Coyoli palm, gru-gru palm,
macaw palm, acrocome, Coyolipalme,
amankayo, corojo, corozo, baboso,
tucuma, and totai) (Herrera 2007, p. 20;
Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p.
144; Jordan and Munn 1993; www.arsgrin.gov, www.pacsoa.org.au). The
macaws first puncture the apex of the
mesocarp and remove the outer layer
(Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p.
´
144). The motacu continually produces
fruit throughout the year. Between 80
´
and 90 percent of motacu palms
produce fruits all year, but its peak is
between July and December (LPF 2003,
p. 21; Moraes et al. 1996, p. 424).
´
Motacu is believed to be pollinated by
beetles in the Mystrops genus (Moraes et
al. 1996, p. 425). The same palm tree
may produce at any one time between
three and five racemes (flowering stalks,
each with fruits in a different stage of
development ripeness) (Yamashita and
M. de Barros 1997, p. 144).
The species has also been observed at
clay licks (Kyle 2007a, p. 2), which are
clay banks where they consume soil or
minerals; however, the reason for the
clay consumption remains unclear.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2241
Range and Habitat Description
The blue-throated macaw is endemic
to the tropical savanna ecoregion of
north-central Bolivia in the Department
of Beni (LPF 2010; Kingsbury 2010, p.
8). This ecoregion is approximately
160,000 square kilometers (km2) (61,776
square miles (mi2)). (See Appendix A in
Docket no. FWS–R9–ES–2012–0034 at
https://www.regulations.gov for a map of
the region (hereinafter referred to as
‘‘Appendix A’’)). Within this region, the
blue-throated macaw is found mostly in
widely dispersed isolated pairs within
an area estimated to be between 8,000
and 12,900 km2 (3,089 and 4,981 mi2),
(LPF 2012; BLI 2012; Hesse 2000, p.
104). The species is found at elevations
between 200 and 300 m (656 and 984 ft)
(Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p.
144; Brace et al. 1995). The bluethroated macaw’s habitat was occupied
by humans for thousands of years before
European colonization (Erickson 2000,
p. 2). Its habitat consists of lowlands in
an area known as Llanos (plains) de
Mojos, also known as Llanos de Moxos
(LPF 2010; Mayle et al. 2007, p. 301;
Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p.
141). See Appendix A for a photo
representing the flooded habitat. The
Llanos de Mojos is a wide savannah
plain with poor drainage and in the wet
season is extremely susceptible to
flooding. The floods cover large areas of
the plains and the area may remain
flooded for 5 to 7 months in some areas.
These plains include parts of the river
´
´
basins of the Itenez, Mamore, Beni, and
Madre de Dios Rivers (see Appendix A
for a map; Yamashita and M. de Barros
1997, p. 144).
The blue-throated macaw’s habitat
has progressively diminished over
thousands of years and its habitat is
now primarily restricted to small
‘‘islands’’ of suitable habitat within
privately-owned cattle pastures (see
Appendix A in Docket no. FWS–R9–ES–
2012–0034 at https://
www.regulations.gov for a photo
illustrating these islands; Milpacher
2012 personal communication;
Kingsbury 2010, p. 72; Berkunsky 2008,
p. 4; Kyle 2007a, p. 4; Kyle 2006, p. 7;
LPF 2003, p. 6). The species has been
observed in the Barba Azul Nature
Reserve. The blue-throated macaw is
believed to occur on ranches adjacent to
the Barba Azul Nature Reserve, Ranches
Las Gamas, Los Patos, Pelotal, and Juan
Latino, but the status of the species is
unclear in these areas (Kingsbury 2010,
p. 89). In other parts of the species’
range, the species is believed to occur
´
on the ranches Elsner with Espıritu, San
Rafael, and the Estancia El Dorado,
however, to the best of our knowledge,
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
2242
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
these are privately managed and the
species is not being monitored on the
ranches.
Palm Islands
Palm-dominated forest islands form
the blue-throated macaw’s primary
habitat. These ‘‘islands’’ are on elevated
terrain and are sometimes referred to as
‘‘alturas’’ (high ground). The islands
were primarily formed as mounds
resulting from prehistoric human
existence in this region (Erickson 2008,
pp. 168–169). The lowlands are
frequently inundated by water due to
the flooding of nearby rivers (see
Appendix A). Historically, human
cultures manipulated the water flow to
create plains that were higher and
subsequently drier (Erickson 2008, pp.
168–169). The mounds are common
throughout the savannas and wetlands
of Bolivia; there may be as many as
10,000 of these mounds or islands in
Bolivia (Erickson 2008, p. 169). They
have been found to vary in size from a
few hectares to many square kilometers
(Erickson 2008, pp. 168–169; Yamashita
and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144). Most are
raised less than one meter and are often
surrounded by ponds or moat-like
ditches (Erickson 2008, pp. 168–169).
Typically, these islands are surrounded
by seasonally-flooded grasslands. These
islands are between 0.2–1.0 ha (0.49–
2.47 ac) in size and are approximately
130–235 meters (426–771 feet) above sea
level (Kingsbury et al. 2010, p. 71;
Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p.
144).
´
Besides motacu, palm species found
on these islands are typically Syagrus
´
botriophora (sumuque), and
Astrocaryum vulgare (chontilla),
interspersed with semi-deciduous
emergent trees such as Enterolobium
´
cortisiliqun (parota or orejon), Sterculia
striata (no common name (NCN)) and
Tabebuia heptaphilla (Lapacho negro),
and the Curupau tree (Anadenanthera
colubrina) (also known as yopo, vilca,
huilco, wilco, cebil, or angico) (Kyle
2005, p. 7). Some trees such as Ceiba
pentandra (mapajo or kapok tree) and
Hura crepitans (common names include
catahua, Ochoo, arbol del diablo, acacu,
monkey’s dinner-bell, habillo, ceiba de
leche, sandbox tree, possum wood,
dynamite tree, ceiba blanca, assacu, and
posentri) can reach more than 40 m (131
ft) in height.
´
The motacu palms may have survived
on the mound islands for various
reasons—their value to human cultures,
their resistance to burning, and their
ecological suitability to the
´
microclimate. Motacu is not only vital
to the life history of blue-throated
macaws; it also has local, commercial,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
and ecosystem importance (Kyle 2005,
p. 3; Moraes et al. 1996, pp. 424–425).
This species of palm is used in the local
community as thatch for housing which
can last up to seven years. Its fruit is
consumed by humans and various other
species, and parts of the palm tree are
used to make baskets, brooms, and is
sold commercially as palm oil
(Zambrana et al. 2007, p. 2785; Moraes
et al. 1996, pp. 425–426).
Significance of Palm Islands to BlueThroated Macaws
Habitat favored by blue-throated
macaws contains tall, mature trees in
´
areas with continuous motacu palm
fruit production (Yamashita and M. de
Barros 1997, p. 145). Densities of
´
motacu, the blue-throated macaw’s
preferred nesting and feeding source,
vary greatly. In the 1997 Yamashita and
M. de Barros study, macaws were only
´
observed in areas where motacu
represented more than 60 percent of the
trees.
Natural cavities in dead or decaying
´
trees (usually motacu palms) are the
primary source of nesting sites for this
species. Blue-throated macaws prefer
dead trees that have cavities with a
minimum internal diameter of 30 cm
(11.8 in) for nesting, and, therefore, the
tree must have a diameter at breast
height of 60 cm (23.6 in) or greater (see
Appendix A for a picture representing a
tree cavity; Yamashita and M. de Barros
1997, p. 145).
Factors Affecting the Species
Section 4 of the Act, and its
implementing regulations at 50 CFR part
424, set forth the procedures for adding
species to the Federal Lists of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants. Under section 4(a)(1) of the
Act, we may list a species based on any
of the following five factors: (A) The
present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range; (B) overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes; (C) disease or
predation; (D) the inadequacy of
existing regulatory mechanisms; and (E)
other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence. Listing
actions may be warranted based on any
of the above factors, singly or in
combination. Each of these factors is
evaluated and a summary is presented
in this document.
Loss of Palm Islands Due to Habitat
Conversion
Within the past few hundred years,
the blue-throated macaw lost much of
its remaining habitat due to conversion
of palm forests to pasture for cattle
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
grazing. Cattle are not native to Bolivia;
they were introduced to Bolivia in the
1600s. After the Second World War,
cattle ranching and the associated
burning of pastures began to have a
significant impact on the landscape
(Robison et al. 2000, p. 61). The
macaw’s preferred habitat is now
limited to a few small, isolated islands
of suitable habitat which are surrounded
by these cattle ranches (Gilardi 2012
pers. comm.). During the flooding
season which can occur up to six
months of a year, cattle take refuge on
´
the motacu palm islands because the
islands are drier due to their higher
elevation (LPF 2003, p. 33). Adding to
habitat loss, in the preferred habitat of
the blue-throated macaw where these
´
motacu palms remain (within privatelyowned cattle ranches), local ranchers
typically burn the pastures annually
(Berkunsky 2008, p. 4; del Hoyo 1997).
This type of burning results in almost
no recruitment of native palm trees,
which are vital to the ecological needs
of the blue-throated macaw (Yamashita
and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144). The
reduction in habitat (reduced
´
availability of motacu palms) and lack
´
of recruitment of motacu palms is a
concern for the future because it takes
´
several years for motacu palms to be
able to produce fruit and to develop into
a size suitable for nesting cavities. As
mitigation, there are local conservation
efforts to attempt to not only plant trees
that provide food for blue-throated
macaws, as well as education efforts
directed towards land-owners within
the range of the blue-throated macaws.
The lack of nesting cavities (suitable
habitat) is often a limiting factor for bird
species that depend on these cavities for
nesting (Sandoval and Barrantes 2009,
p. 75; Kyle 2006, p. 8). Blue-throated
macaws requires specific nesting
cavities for raising their young which
provide an environment where they are
safe from predation and flooding.
Additionally, many different species
compete for nest sites because there is
a lack of suitable nest sites in the Llanos
de Mojos due to habitat loss. This loss
of suitable trees has resulted in
increased competition from other
species for these nesting cavities as
well. The loss of habitat has contributed
to other factors that affect blue-throated
macaws such as an increase in
vulnerability to predation, extreme
weather events, and competition for
nests, which are discussed below.
Nest Failure
Nest failure (the failure of nestlings to
survive to fledgling stage) continues for
various reasons, despite intensive
conservation efforts (Berkunsky 2010, p.
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
4; Kyle 2006, p. 8). Some of the primary
causes of nest failure have been
predation, infestation by botflies
(parasites in the Philornis genus),
exposure to severe weather events such
as flooding, and competition with other
species such as bees (Berkunsky 2010,
pp. 4–5). Many nestlings die in early
developmental stages, often due to
starvation (due to lack of food and
parental neglect), exposure to cold
temperatures, or flooding (Kyle 2007a,
pp. 1–10). If parents do not have access
to enough nutritional food sources,
some nestlings are neglected so that
their other nestlings will survive.
Sometimes nestlings can also fall out of
collapsed trees before they have fledged.
During five field seasons of closely
observing nest sites, often 50 percent of
nestlings died (Berkunsky 2008, p. 5;
Kyle 2007a, pp. 7–8). See additional
discussion below under Exposure to
extreme weather events section.
Predation
Predation stands out as one of the
main reasons why this species’
population is not increasing (Kyle
2007a, pp. 3, 6–7; Kyle 2006, p. 8). As
an example, during one season, of the
seven active blue-throated macaw nests
found, all of the nestlings within three
nests were lost to predation (Kyle 2007a,
pp. 6–8). Because the species has such
a small population size with likely
fewer than 150 remaining in the wild),
losses such as this have a significant
effect. Predators of the blue-throated
macaw include:
Toco toucan (Ramphastos toco),
Crane hawk (Geranospiza
caerulescens),
Great-horned owl (Bubo virginianus),
and
Southern crested caracara (Caracara
plancus, a bird of prey).
The blue-throated macaws’ habitat of
sparse, palm-forested islands scattered
among natural grasslands, is especially
vulnerable to nest predation (Kyle
2007a, pp. 6–7). Tree nest cavities
chosen by blue-throated macaws tend to
be very visible to other avian species
flying overhead. In addition to choosing
nests in palm islands, blue-throated
macaws are also known to nest in
isolated palms in open fields, which are
even more exposed than nesting in palm
islands (Herrera et al. 2007, p. 20). All
of the species that predate on adult
blue-throated macaws, eggs, or nestlings
have large distributions and are
commonly found at the habitat islands
used by blue-throated macaws (Kyle
2007a, pp. 6–7). Great horned owls have
been seen at almost every site where
blue-throated macaws are nesting and
monitored (Kyle 2007a, p. 6). These
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
owls, native to South America, have a
vast range, are the most widely
distributed owl in South America, and
occupy a variety of habitats including
open forest, farmland, and grassland.
Because blue-throated macaw nests
are concentrated in these small
‘‘islands’’ of trees within cattle pastures,
they are more easily located by
predators than species that nest in a
continuous forest setting. To discourage
and mitigate the effects of predation,
some conservation activities being
conducted include the monitoring and
discouragement of predators from
attacking blue-throated macaw nests.
These efforts are extremely intensive for
each nest. In one case, where it
appeared the nest tree was collapsing,
the tree was monitored all night by
conservation staff (Kyle 2007a, p. 9).
Often trees containing active nests are
monitored in this way if persistent
predation has been observed. The
mitigation efforts are helpful—if
nestlings can survive until they are at
least 300 grams (0.66 pounds), they have
a greater chance of survival (Kyle 2007a,
p. 7).
Botfly parasites can also cause
mortality of nestlings and have been
observed in blue-throated macaw
nestlings. Botflies live subcutaneously,
and feed on macaws before pupating
(Wunderle Jr. and Arendt 2011, p. 39).
Botflies significantly reduce the energy
available for nestling growth and
development (Uhazy and Arendt 1986
in Wunderle Jr. and Arendt 2011, p. 39)
and can cause high death rates of
nestlings. In one study of avian
nestlings, botfly parasitism caused 56
percent of mortalities while egg and
chick losses from nest predators and
competitors accounted for less than 10
percent of reproductive failures (Arendt
2000 in Wunderle Jr. and Arendt 2011,
p. 39).
Exposure to Extreme Weather Events
Due to their preferred nesting
location, blue-throated macaws are also
vulnerable to natural catastrophic
events such as flooding, drought, and
other stochastic disturbances (Kyle
2006, pp. 5–6). Bolivia is described as
a ‘‘climatically volatile region’’ and is
one of the countries in the world most
affected by natural disasters in recent
years (Oxfam International 2009, p. 5).
This species’ habitat experiences radical
changes over the course of a year.
For many months of the year its
habitat is flooded, and other times
during the year, its habitat suffers from
severe drought. High rainfall occurs
during the summer months; the wet
season is between September and May.
Annual precipitation is between 1,100–
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2243
2,500 millimeters (43–98 inches) (Haase
& Beck 1989 in Kingsbury 2010, p. 9).
Very heavy periods of rainfall in this
region can continue for long periods of
time (Kyle 2006, pp. 5–6; Hanagarth and
Sarmiento 1990 in Beck and Moraes,
undated). Every 6–12 years, 80–90
percent of the region is inundated (Beck
and Moraes, undated). This cyclical
˜
flooding may be an El Nino event, but
there has been no study correlating the
phenomena (Mayle et al. 2007, p. 294,
Beck and Moraes, undated). Although
these areas are seasonally-flooded, they
are also prone to periods of drought
(Kyle 2007a, p. 3, Mayle et al. 2007, p.
294; Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997,
p. 144).
Severe storms, such as one that
occurred in 2005 are described as ‘‘nest
killers.’’ These severe storms cause the
dead palm trees in which the nests have
been constructed to collapse or flood
(Kyle 2007b, p. 15) which causes nest
failure for the season and subsequently
no recruitment. During periods of
drought, nestlings are sometimes
neglected and starve. Heavy storms and
rain contribute to nest failure; if
nestlings are exposed to cold weather
and rain, they may die.
Dead palm trees often collapse in
these storms. During the 2006–2007
season, this phenomenon was observed
when the nest of one blue-throated
´
macaw pair in a motacu dead palm tree
collapsed due to strong winds (Kyle
2007a, p. 4). Although the reason is
unclear, these dead palm trees are
currently the preferred sites for nest
construction by the blue-throated
macaw and they have strong nest site
fidelity (Berkunsky 2012 pers. comm.).
The extent this behavior is learned and
modified is also unclear. However,
researchers are working with this
species to introduce nest sites that are
safer and less prone to predation and
nest failure due to extreme weather
events such as flooding (Berkunsky
2010, pp. 4–5). Flooding, a significant
cause of nest failure in the recent past,
is reported not to have occurred in nests
that have been intensely monitored and
human-manipulated since 2008. This is
due to one of the conservation measures
in place: drilling drain holes in the nests
and at the bottom of the dead palm trees
in order to prevent nest flooding.
However, flooding can still occur if
nests are not monitored and
manipulated.
Competition for Nest Sites
In addition to nest failure, there is a
shortage of nests. As described above,
there is little remaining of the preferred
habitat of motacu palms. The species
appears to ‘‘learn’’ nesting sites, and
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
2244
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
will re-use nesting locations that they
had used in the past (Berkunsky 2010;
Kyle 2007a, p. 4). Although it is unclear
why blue-throated macaws choose to
´
nest in the top of dead motacu palms
and are subsequently exposed to
predation, competition from other
species for nests, drought, excessive
rainfall and nest flooding, it is their
preferred nesting tree because it
provides easy access to their preferred
food source. Many species, in addition
to the blue-throated macaw, use the
´
motacu palm for feeding and nesting. In
the Llanos de Mojos, there are 21
species of parrots which may compete
for nest sites (Kingsbury et. al. 2010, p.
83; Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997,
p. 144). Some species known to compete
for nest sites with the blue-throated
macaw include the blue and gold
macaw, woodpeckers, and bees (Kyle
2007a, p. 6; LPF 2003, p. 33).
In order to provide more choices for
nesting habitat, conservation
organizations are installing nest boxes. n
2009, in the Barba Azul Nature Reserve,
46 artificial nests were monitored, in
part by video cameras; however, the
majority of them (24 nests) were
occupied by blue and gold macaws (LPF
2010, p. 15). Likely due to the larger size
of the blue and gold macaw or perhaps
their more aggressive nature, the blue
and gold macaws usually win most
confrontations for nests (Kyle 2007a, p.
6). During the 2010 field study at the
Barba Azul Nature Reserve, researchers
also observed that there were a greater
number of blue and gold macaws using
the Barba Azul Nature Reserve than
blue-throated macaws (Kingsbury 2010,
p. 83). At an area where both species
were drinking water, researchers noted
that the blue-throated macaws exhibited
agitated behavior when blue and yellow
macaws were nearby (Kingsbury 2010,
p. 83). Although the Barba Azul Nature
Reserve was established specifically for
the blue-throated macaws, other species
use the reserve and compete for nesting
sites.
To mitigate this problem, at least two
conservation organizations are installing
nest boxes to create more available sites
for nesting, but despite the past 10 years
of conservation efforts and
experimentation with nest boxes, nest
failure still occurs. In addition to
predation, other reasons for nest failure
are numerous, which has instigated the
experimentation and installation of
these nest boxes. Bees and other species
continue to compete with blue-throated
macaws for these nest boxes. After many
years of experimentation, the nest boxes
are slowly becoming more effective at
providing suitable nesting sites. The
blue-throated macaws seem to habituate
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
to certain nesting sites and locations
likely based on food availability and
learned behavior.
Although blue-throated macaws have
begun to use some of the nest boxes, it
has been a slow and tedious process to
encourage blue-throated macaws to use
these boxes, and the population
continues to suffer losses, particularly
due to nest failure, which the
installation of suitable nest boxes is
attempting to alleviate. When nests fail
(no nestlings survive that season), a
significant amount of effort has been
expended by that breeding pair. Because
this species has such a small population
(likely there are less than 150
individuals remaining), each time a
nestling survives to become an adult, it
is extremely significant to the
population. Macaws tend to mate for
life, so each individual blue-throated
macaw is extremely valuable to the
population, particularly. The species
also cares for its young over two
seasons, so each pair of macaws invests
a significant amount of energy into its
young. The effect of the death of each
new nestling on the population of bluethroated macaws is devastating to the
viability of the population. If the
nestlings survive the first season to the
point they fledge, their chances of
survival are much greater than when
they are new nestlings when they are
entirely dependent on their parents for
survival.
Bees can also make both natural
nesting cavities and man-made nest
boxes inhospitable for blue-throated
macaws (Berkunsky 2008, p. 5). At the
beginning of one breeding season, 67
percent of nest boxes monitored were
occupied by bees (Berkunsky 2008, p.
5). After being removed, bees had
returned within 2 weeks. Most naturally
occurring nest sites, because there are so
few of them and they are in demand by
numerous species, require intense
monitoring and manipulation in order
to maintain an attractive, suitable
environment for the blue-throated
macaws for nesting.
Disease
Macaws are susceptible to many
bacterial, parasitic, and viral diseases,
particularly in captive environments
(Kistler et al. 2009, p. 2,176; Portaels et
al. 1996, p. 319; Bennett et al. 1991).
Macaws are prone to many viral
infections such as retrovirus, pox virus,
and paramyxo virus which can cause
weakened immune systems and
subsequent death (Gaskin 1989, pp. 249,
251, 252). Recently, histopathological
examination revealed the likely
presence of the pox virus in dead bluethroated macaw nestlings, indicating
that close contact between blue-throated
macaws and domestic poultry may be
facilitating pathogen transmission to
this highly vulnerable species (Wildlife
Conservation Society (WCS) in litt.
2011). In one location within the very
limited range of the blue-throated
macaw, blue-throated macaws share
water sources with chickens, ducks, and
other avian species (WCS in litt. 2011;
Kingsbury 2010, p. 83). Blue-throated
macaws in this area are being closely
monitored to decrease the possibility of
transmission of the pox virus; however,
it is still a concern.
Proventricular dilatation disease
(PDD) is one of the worst diseases
known to affect parrots (Kistler et al.
2008, p. 2). PDD, also known as avian
bornavirus (ABV) or macaw wasting
disease, is a fatal disease that poses a
serious threat to all domesticated and
wild parrots worldwide, particularly
those with very small populations
(Kistler et al. 2008, p. 1; Abramson et al.
1995, p. 288). This contagious disease
causes damage to the nerves of the
upper digestive tract, so that food
digestion and absorption are negatively
affected. The disease has a 100-percent
mortality rate in affected birds, although
the exact manner of transmission
between birds is unclear (Kistler et al.
2008, p. 1). PDD has been documented
in several continents in more than 50
different parrot species and in freeranging species in at least five other
orders of birds (Kistler et al. 2008, p. 2).
This disease is somewhat concerning
because blue-throated macaws share
water sources with other species of
birds, and this disease could be
transmitted between individuals that are
within close range.
This species is closely monitored in
the wild; conservationists working with
this species are taking precautions so
that diseases are not introduced into the
wild population. Despite close
monitoring and precautions, disease is
likely to affect this extremely small
population; therefore, we are concerned
that diseases will become problematic to
this species in the wild.
Small Population Size
An additional factor that affects the
continued existence of this species is its
small, declining population of likely
less than 150 individuals. Recently, two
disturbing observations have been
made: Malformations in chicks and
reduced fertility in many reproductive
pairs (WCS in litt. 2011). Small, rapidly
declining populations of species,
combined with other threats such as
reduced reproductive success, leads to
an increased risk of extinction (Harris
and Pimm 2008, p. 169). This species
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
faces many challenges—it has many
predators, limited suitable habitat, and
competition from other species for nest
sites, in addition to its small population
size. Any loss of potentially reproducing
individuals could have a devastating
effect on the ability of the population to
increase. Small populations have a
higher risk of extinction due to random
environmental events (Shaffer 1981, p.
131; Gilpin and Soule 1986, pp. 24–28;
Shaffer 1987, pp. 69–75). Because of its
small population and restricted range,
the blue throated macaw is vulnerable
to random environmental events; in
particular, it is threatened by extreme
precipitation events and nest flooding.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Removal From the Wild
Removal of parrots from the wild over
the past few hundred years contributed
to this species’ small population size
((LPF 2012; Herrera and Hennessey
2009, p. 233; Kyle 2007a). Macaws, both
live and dead, have been a significant
part of Bolivian culture for thousands of
years. Evidence of this exists in preColombian Andean feather art
(American Museum of Natural History
2012). Feathers have been used
historically in headdresses; and parrots
have been used in ceremonial sacrifices
(American Museum of Natural History
2012; Berdan 2004, p. 4; Creel and
McKusick 1994, pp. 510–511). Feathers
of blue-throated macaws would still be
used for headdresses today if it were not
for intervention and education programs
implemented by nongovernmental
conservation organizations (NGOs) (BLI
2012; LPF 2010; LPF 2003, p. 29). In
addition to being used in ceremonies
and costumes, there is evidence that
parrots have been household pets since
at least A.D. 1000 (Creel and McKusick
1994, pp. 513–515) as evidenced in
burial remains; and live macaws very
likely had commercial value even
during that time period. Parrots were
traded over long distances;
archeological remains indicate that
parrots were found well outside their
native range (Creel and McKusick 1994,
pp. 515–516).
The most significant impact to the
decline of this species’ population was
likely due to collection for museums
during the late 1800s and early 1900s
(Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p.
144). During this time period, bird-skin
traders of European descent sold
thousands of bird skins, especially to
museums in the United States for at
least three generations (Smithsonian
National Museum of Natural History
2012; Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997,
p. 144; Trimble 1936, pp. 41–43).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
The Inadequacy of Existing Regulatory
Mechanisms
Under the Act, we are required to
evaluate the whether the existing
regulatory mechanisms are adequate.
There are limited legal mechanisms in
place to protect this species (de la Torre
et. al. 2011, p. 334; Herrera and
Hennessey 2007, p. 295; LPF 2003, p. 6–
7). This species is considered critically
endangered by the International Union
for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (BLI
2012; LPF 2012). However, IUCN
rankings do not confer any actual
protection or management. This species
is listed in Appendix I of CITES (CITES
2012), which, along with the ban by the
Bolivian Government in 1984 to export
this species, effectively limits
international trade (LPF 2012; Herrera
and Hennessey 2009, p. 233–234; LPF
Recovery Plan 2003, p. 7). CITES
Appendix I includes species that are
‘‘threatened with extinction which are
or may be affected by trade.’’ Species
listed under Appendix I may not be
traded for primarily commercial
purposes. These protections were put in
place because the species had suffered
substantial population declines
throughout its range due to habitat
destruction and overexploitation.
Within Bolivia, the government of
Bolivia has enacted various laws and
regulatory mechanisms to protect and
manage wildlife and their habitats. For
example, the Bolivian Government
prohibits and takes sanctions against the
possession and the traffic of any
protected species such as the bluethroated macaw (LPF Recovery Plan
2003, p. 7). Further, a study published
in 2011 noted that many institutional
changes have occurred in recent years in
Bolivia (de la Torre et al. 2011, p. 332).
However, even after the export of this
species was prohibited in the 1980s and
despite the laws in place and the
intense conservation efforts ongoing for
this species, the species’ population has
not recovered and some localized illegal
trade is still occurring.
International trade in this species is
now negligible (https://www.unepwcmc.org, accessed June 4, 2012).
International trade of the blue-throated
macaw was initially restricted by the
listing of the species in Appendix II of
the Convention on International Trade
in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna
and Flora (CITES) in 1981, and in 1983,
the species was transferred from
Appendix II to Appendix I. CITES
regulates international trade in animal
and plant species listed under the
Convention. For additional information
on CITES, visit https://www.cites.org/.
Between 1981 and 1985, 134 Blue-
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2245
throated Macaws were reported to have
been exported to the United States
(TRAFFIC 1987 in Herrera and
Hennessey 2007, p. 296). However, no
specimens of blue-throated macaws
have been exported from Bolivia since
1984 when Bolivia banned the export of
this species (https://www.unepwcmc.org, accessed June 4, 2012).
Although international trade is not a
concern, poaching for local sale
continues to occur (LPF 2012; Herrera
and Hennessey 2009, p. 233; Kyle
2007a). Although Bolivia banned the
export of live parrots in 1984 (Brace et
al. 1995, pp. 27–28), localized illegal
trade within South America continued
to occur, although it became less
frequent (Herrera and Hennessey 2009,
p. 233). For example, in 1993,
investigators reported that an
Argentinean bird dealer was offering
Bolivian dealers a ‘‘high price’’ for bluethroated macaws (Jordan and Munn
1993, p. 695).
More recently, a study of markets in
Santa Cruz, Bolivia estimated that over
22,000 individuals of 31 parrot species
were illegally traded during 2004–2005
despite Bolivian laws (Herrera and
Hennessey 2007, p. 298). Bolivian Law
1333 (Ministerio de Desarrollo
Sostenible y Planificacion 1999), Article
111 states that all persons involved in
trade, capture, and transportation
without authorization of wild animals
will suffer a two-year prison sentence
together with a fine equivalent to 100
percent of the value of the animal. This
law is supported by an addendum that
states that all threatened species are of
national importance and must be
protected (Herrera and Hennessey 2007,
´
´
p. 295). Asociacion Armonıa (a
nonprofit organization in Bolivia)
monitored the trade of wild birds that
passed through a pet market in Santa
Cruz, Bolivia, from periods between July
2004 to December 2007 (Herrera and
Hennessey 2009, p. 233; Herrera and
Hennessey 2007, p. 295). During the
2004–2005 study period, none of the
parrots found were blue-throated
macaws. In 2006, two blue-throated
macaws were found for sale (Herrera
and Hennessey 2009, p. 233). However,
the blue-throated macaw was absent in
the market during the monitoring period
prior to 2006 and no blue-throated
macaws were found for sale in this
market in 2007 (Herrera and Hennessey
2009, p. 233; Herrera and Hennessey
2007, p. 295). This absence of the
species in the market may be due either
to the effectiveness of the ongoing
conservation programs and laws in
Bolivia, or it may be indicative of the
scarcity of blue-throated macaws in the
wild. Ninety-four percent of the birds
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
2246
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
documented were believed to be wildcaught. This illegal activity occurs
despite the national laws that ban
unauthorized trade (Herrera and
Hennessey 2007, p. 298).
The high value of this species could
lead to continued illegal trade. An
Internet search indicated that captivebred specimens of this species sell for
between $1,500 and $3,000 in the
United States (www.hoobly.com,
accessed September 13, 2010). One
search advertised that this is a ‘‘very
rare species and there are only 300 left
in the wild.’’ However, alternatively,
because these birds are not difficult to
breed in captivity, the supply of captivebred birds has increased which some
experts believe may be alleviating illegal
collection of wild birds (Waugh 2007a).
Removal of blue-throated macaws
from the wild can have a particularly
devastating effect given their low
reproductive rate, and slow recovery
from various environmental pressures
(Lee 2010, p. 3; Wright et al. 2001, p.
711). In situations where the population
is very small and the species is adding
new individuals to the population at
such a slow rate (due to high nestling
mortality), any unauthorized removal
from the wild will have a significant
effect on the species’ population. Some
blue-throated macaws have even been
used for fish bait (Kyle 2007a, p. 7). The
remains of a blue-throated macaw were
found near a lake stuffed into a tree
cavity with a bag of salt (Kyle 2007a, p.
7). Because this species has so few
individuals remaining, any removal
from the wild is extremely detrimental
to the survival of the species when
taken into consideration with all of the
other factors acting upon the species.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
In-Situ Conservation
This species is considered by many
organizations to be the most endangered
macaw remaining in the wild (BLI 2012;
World Parrot Trust (WPT) 2012; LPF
2010, LPF 2003, p. 4). Several NGCOs
are working intensely on various
conservation projects to protect this
species and its habitat. Various NGCOs
have been involved in the conservation
of this species since 1995 with
authorization from the Bolivian
Government (Gilardi 2012, pers. comm.;
LPF 2002, p. 10). NGCOs involved
´
´
include Asociacion Armonıa (Bolivia’s
BirdLife International partner); the Loro
´
Parque Fundacion (LPF), and WPT. A
Species Recovery Plan that provides the
basis for the Blue-throated Macaw
Conservation Program was approved by
Bolivia’s Ministry for Sustainable
Development in 2004 and has been in
place since then (LPF 2003, pp. 6–7).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
Within its breeding range, a multitude
of efforts are in progress to conserve the
species (Gilardi 2012 personal
communication; Berkunsky 2010, p. 5,
Kyle 2007, pp. 1–11). Conservation
measures include constant monitoring,
protection, and manipulation of nests,
supplementing nestlings’ diet when
food sources are scarce, agreements with
private landowners, patrolling existing
macaw habitat by foot and motorbike,
and monitoring the Beni lowlands for
additional populations (LPF 2012; Kyle
2007a; Snyder et al. 2000).
Nongovernmental conservation
organizations (NGCOs) have
implemented cooperation agreements
with the federation of cattle farmers of
the Beni (FEGABENI) and the local
authorities in Trinidad (LPF et al. 2003,
p. 6).
Land acquisition to expand protected
habitat for this species has been funded
by the World Land Trust. In 2008,
´
´
Asociacion Armonıa and LPF purchased
a 3,555-ha (8,785-ac) reserve for the
purpose of establishing a protected area
for the blue-throated macaw
(WorldLand Trust 2010, accessed July
16, 2010; BLI 2008). In 2010, the Barba
Azul Nature Reserve was expanded by
1,123 hectares (ha) (2,775 acres (ac)),
creating a total protected area for the
blue-throated macaws of 4,664 ha
´
´
(11,525 ac) (Asociacion Armonıa 2012).
Currently, this Reserve is the only
protected area designated for the bluethroated macaw. Legal protections that
apply fall under Bolivian Law 1333
(Ministerio de Desarrollo Sostenible y
Planificacion 1999), Article 111. This
Reserve protects savanna habitat; and
habitat restoration is occurring in the
Reserve, although it is unclear the
extent the Reserve is used by bluethroated macaws. The actual protections
in place include monitoring of habitat,
local education and awareness programs
about the species, establishment of
suitable nesting sites. Approximately 70
blue-throated macaws have been
observed in or around this Reserve
(Herrera 2012, pers. comm.); however,
these macaws may be some of the same
macaws that are observed in other parts
of its range during the breeding season
(Berkunsky 2012, pers. comm.).
Despite the existence of the reserve,
there are no nests in the Reserve that are
occupied by the blue-throated macaws
(Herrera 2012, personal
communication). Although bluethroated macaws do not use this area for
breeding, there is evidence that they use
the Reserve for feeding (Herrera 2012,
personal communication; Kingsbury
2010, pp. 69–82). It appears that bluethroated macaws use the Reserve and
adjacent ranches during the non-
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
breeding season while their breedingseason habitat is seasonally-flooded (see
Appendix A for a map of its range;
Milpacher 2012, personal
communication; Herrera 2012, personal
communication). Other than the Barba
Azul Nature Reserve, there are no
protected areas in the Llanos de Mojos
except the Beni Biosphere Reserve,
which has been in existence since 1986.
However, to our knowledge, the bluethroated macaw does not use the Beni
Biosphere Reserve (Hesse and Duffield
2000, p. 258).
In addition to conservation efforts, the
NGCOs working in Bolivia are
conducting field research to better
understand the current state of this
species. However, the conservation
work is extremely difficult due to the
various factors that affect the species.
Because the species’ habitat is flooded
for 6 months of the year, monitoring its
habitat is impossible during certain
seasons (Berkunsky 2010, p. 5). There
have also been discussions of
reintroducing captive-raised birds into
the wild; however, this practice could
inadvertently introduce disease into the
wild population if precautions are not
taken to minimize the transmission of
disease to other blue-throated macaws.
Another conservation measure in
´
place is research on the motacu palm
(Milpacher 2012, personal
communication) because the number of
´
motacu palms is decreasing. This palm
species plays a significant role in the
life cycle of the blue-throated macaw.
One study found that the old and
´
senescent motacu palms significantly
exceed the younger palms (LPF 2003, p.
21). Based on their findings, researchers
concluded that the islands containing
´
´
motacu are not regenerating motacu
palms sufficiently. It is likely that the
lack of regeneration is due to overgrazing by cattle and excessive use of
fire over centuries (Kyle 2006, p. 5).
WPT has recently attempted several
small scale palm germination
experiments to assess reestablishing
palm habitat (Milpacher 2012, pers.
´
comm.). The motacu palm has
commercial value in addition to its
ecological role. Palm trees are used for
a multitude of purposes such as thatch
for housing, fruit, and palm oil (de la
Torre et al. 2011, pp. 327–369;
Zambrana et al. 2007, pp. 2771–2778).
´
Motacu palm-dominated islands may
have persisted in part due to their
various ecological and commercial
values, but they certainly persist in part
because the islands are raised areas
within the lowlands areas that are prone
to flooding. With respect to the shortterm, local researchers believe that there
´
will be adequate motacu fruits in the
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
region for a few more decades (LPF
2003, p. 21); however, research on the
´
motacu is vital to the conservation of
the blue-throated macaw.
Educational awareness programs are
in place in addition to research and
´
´
monitoring. The Asociacion Armonıa is
involved in an awareness campaign to
ensure that the protection and
conservation of these birds occurs at a
local level (e.g., protection of macaws
from trappers and the sustainable
management of key habitats such as
palm groves and forest islands, on their
property) (Llampa 2007; BLI 2008a;
Snyder et al. 2000). Two educational
awareness centers have been established
in the towns of Santa Ana del Yacuma
and Santa Rosa del Yacuma (LPF 2010,
p. 16). In response to the limited but
continued poaching that occurs in the
wild, LPF initiated a travelling
exhibition, ‘‘Extinction is Forever,’’
which visited 17 urban localities in
Bolivia in 2010 (LPF 2010, p. 15). The
exhibition includes 21 photographs that
explain the ancestral and present day
relationship between people and birds,
and highlights the effects of illegal trade
of wild birds in Bolivia currently. An
estimated 1,000 visitors attended each
showing in the main cities (LPF 2010,
p. 15).
In summary, the conservation efforts
underway are abundant, but require
significant effort. Reproductive success
is vital to the blue-throated macaw
recovery and this species faces many
challenges to successfully reproducing.
This species’ nest often has an open
crown (i.e. no roof) and is prone to
flooding (Berkunsky 2010, p. 4; Kyle
2007a, p. 3). During many seasons,
nests, eggs, and nestlings are destroyed
due to flooding. Both WBT and
´
´
Asociacion Armonıa have been
conducting conservation activities such
as installation of artificial nest boxes
that provide safe habitat, manipulating
nests so that they do not flood, and
discouraging predators and nest
competitors. The installation of a
multitude and variety of nest boxes is a
way to boost breeding success. Because
many other species compete for these
nest boxes, and blue-throated macaws
tend to re-use previously-used nesting
sites, the process of introducing nest
boxes and encouraging blue-throated
macaws to use them while discouraging
other species from using them is a very
time-intensive process. Despite all of
these conservation efforts, fewer than
150 individuals of this species are
believed to remain in the wild.
Other Factors
An additional factor that affects the
nesting success of blue-throated macaws
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
is the availability of food sources—not
only the abundance of food, but the
timing of its availability. Phenology
(how the timing of plant life cycle
events interacts with animal biological
processes) is influenced by variations in
´
climate. The timing of motacu palm
fruit production is critical for various
life stages of the blue-throated macaw,
particularly during the period following
´
hatching. The motacu palms, on which
blue-throated macaws depend for
nesting as well as feeding, are affected
by drought, burning, and excessive
rainfall. In years when there is
significant drought or excessive rainfall,
the fruiting abundance and timing of
fruit production can significantly affect
the success of nestlings, or it can
prohibit blue-throated macaws from
even attempting to nest (Kyle 2007). In
some seasons when food is not as
plentiful, breeding pairs may choose not
to brood and the weakest of the
nestlings are neglected by its parents
and die of starvation (Kyle 2007a, pp. 4–
5). During these times, in some cases,
the diet is supplemented by these
conservation organizations; however, it
is a very intensive process.
In summary, there are many factors
that are causing stress to this species’
population. It is affected primarily by
predation, nest flooding, and lack of
nest sites. Combined with its reduced
population size, the species lacks
sufficient redundancy and resiliency to
recover from present and future threats
without intervention and intense
conservation actions.
Finding (Proposed Listing
Determination)
In assessing whether the blue-throated
macaw meets the definition of a
threatened or endangered species, we
considered the five factors in section
4(a)(1) of the Act. A species is
‘‘endangered’’ for purposes of the Act if
it is in danger of extinction throughout
all or a significant portion of its range
and is ‘‘threatened’’ if it is likely to
become endangered within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range. In
considering what factors might
constitute threats to a species, we must
look beyond the mere exposure of the
species to the factor to evaluate whether
the species may respond to the factor in
a way that causes actual impacts to the
species. If there is exposure to a factor
and the species responds negatively, the
factor may be a threat and we attempt
to determine how significant a threat it
is. The threat is significant if it drives,
or contributes to, the risk of extinction
of the species such that the species may
warrant listing as endangered or
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2247
threatened as those terms are defined in
the Act. We conducted a review of the
status of this species and assessed
whether the blue-throated macaw is
threatened or endangered throughout all
of its range. On the basis of the best
scientific and commercial information,
we do not find that the factors affecting
the species are likely to be sufficiently
ameliorated in the foreseeable future.
A multitude of factors has contributed
to the decline of this species’
population. In the past, factors that
significantly reduced the number of
blue-throated macaws included habitat
loss and overutilization for the pet trade
and museum specimens (NMNH 2012;
Berkunsky 2010, p. 4; Kyle 2005, pp. 6–
10). Currently, the primary factors that
impact the blue-throated macaws are:
• Lack of adequate nest sites (both in
abundance and effectiveness);
• Failure to adequately reproduce:
nest (clutch) failure (when one or all of
the nestlings fail to survive to fledgling
stage due to a variety of reasons such as
starvation, inadequate nutrition, sibling
competition, or other reasons);
• Nest flooding (if nests are not
monitored and manipulated);
• Botflies;
• Potential inbreeding which results
in malformations and reduced fertility
and loss of genetic variability due to a
small population size (WCS in litt.
2011);
• Competition for nests with more
competitive species such as bees and
other avian species such as other macaw
species; and
• Predation by numerous species,
particularly birds of prey such as
toucans, owls, vultures, other raptors,
and even other macaw species
(Berkunsky 2010, p. 4; Kyle 2006, p. 4,
´
Loro Parque Fundacion 2003, p. 28).
All of these factors combined make
the blue-throated macaw exceptionally
vulnerable to extinction. The historical,
current, and ongoing threats to the bluethroated macaw have reduced the
population such that it is extremely
small, and the remaining pairs face
many challenges to successfully
reproduce offspring. The blue-throated
macaw is currently at risk throughout
all of its range due to historical impacts
of the cumulative habitat loss that
resulted from manipulation of its habitat
over time, and the current practice of
maintaining cattle pastures do not
adequately allow palm species to
regenerate. In addition, overutilization
for the pet trade and museum specimens
has reduced the status of the species to
the point that its population is
vulnerable to permanent extirpation
from the wild. This species is more
vulnerable to the effects of disease and
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
2248
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
predation than it would have been
otherwise. The species is also affected
by stochastic events such as extreme
weather events, which cause nest
flooding and knock down trees where it
has formed nests; we expect this to
continue into the future.
Despite protections in place and
educational awareness programs, this
species is still occasionally being
removed from the wild. A conservation
plan was finalized in 2003 by several
NGCOs and has been in place for almost
10 years. Even though intensive efforts
to recover and conserve this species and
its habitat by at least three NGCOs are
underway, the recovery plan has not
met its goals: the population of this
species is still likely less than 150 in the
wild. This species’ life-history traits
(such as the long investment time to
raise nestlings, reproduction does not
usually occur until age 6; and pairs
generally mating for life), make it
particularly susceptible to extinction.
Additionally, its populations are small,
its remaining suitable habitat is small,
the population may lack genetic
diversity which is causing
malformations in nestlings, and the
species is not reproducing sufficiently.
These threats are currently impacting
blue-throated macaw throughout its
range and will likely continue in the
future.
This species experienced a sharp
population decline in the past few
hundred years because it has been
removed from the wild for various
purposes, and now it faces a multitude
of factors that negatively affect its ability
to reproduce. Although removal of this
species from the wild was detrimental
to this species in the past, we found that
international trade is no longer a factor
currently influencing the species’ status
in the wild; however, limited poaching
continues to occur. Illegal capture for
the local pet trade is exacerbated by the
other factors acting on the species. The
regulatory mechanisms in place are
inadequate to mitigate the factors that
are negatively affecting the species. The
lack of success of the species to increase
its population indicates that the laws
governing wildlife and habitat
protection in Bolivia are inadequate to
protect the species or to mitigate these
threats.
In conclusion, we have carefully
assessed the best scientific and
commercial information available
regarding the past, present, and future
threats affecting this species.
Historically, the blue-throated macaw
existed in much higher numbers in
more continuous, connected habitat. As
described above, there are many obvious
factors that currently affect the blue-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
throated macaws. These include:
inadequate nest sites (both in
abundance and effectiveness), nest
(clutch) failure (when one or all of the
nestlings fail to survive to fledgling
stage due to a variety of reasons such as
starvation, inadequate nutrition, sibling
competition), nest flooding, and botflies;
competition for nests with more
competitive species such as bees and
other avian species such as large
woodpeckers and other macaw species;
and predation by numerous species,
particularly birds of prey such as
toucans, owls, vultures, other raptors,
and even other macaw species.
Our review of the information
pertaining to the five threat factors
supports a conclusion that the
imminence, intensity, and magnitude of
the factors affecting the species occurs
to an extent such that the threats to the
blue-throated macaw, coupled with an
extremely small population that has
declined over the past few hundred
years, place this species at risk of
extinction throughout all of its range,
such that a listing of endangered is
warranted. The species is currently in
danger of extinction because the species
is at such low levels that it is vulnerable
to stochastic environmental events,
particularly predation and nest flooding.
Given the species’ low reproductive
capacity and impaired genetic fitness, it
is unable to increase to the levels of
abundance that is able to withstand
such events. We find that the bluethroated macaw is in danger of
extinction now and, therefore, is
appropriately listed as an endangered
species. Therefore, we propose to list
the blue-throated macaw as endangered
under the Act.
Peer Review
In accordance with our joint policy
with the National Marine Fisheries
Service, ‘‘Notice of Interagency
Cooperative Policy for Peer Review in
Endangered Species Act Activities,’’
published in the Federal Register on
July 1, 1994 (59 FR 34270), we will seek
the expert opinions of at least three
appropriate independent specialists
regarding this proposed rule. The
purpose of peer review is to ensure that
our final determination is based on
scientifically sound data, assumptions,
and analyses. We will send copies of
this proposed rule to the peer reviewers
immediately following publication in
the Federal Register. We will invite
these peer reviewers to comment during
the public comment period on our
specific assumptions and conclusions
regarding the proposal to list the bluethroated macaw.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We will consider all comments and
information we receive during the
comment period on this proposed rule
during our preparation of a final
determination. Accordingly, our final
decision may differ from this proposal.
Available Conservation Measures
Conservation measures provided to
species listed as endangered under the
Act include recognition, requirements
for Federal protection, and prohibitions
against certain practices. Recognition
through listing results in public
awareness, and encourages and results
in conservation actions by Federal and
State governments, private agencies and
interest groups, and individuals.
The Act and its implementing
regulations set forth a series of general
prohibitions and exceptions that apply
to all endangered wildlife. These
prohibitions, at 50 CFR 17.21, in part,
make it illegal for any person subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States to
‘‘take’’ (includes harass, harm, pursue,
hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture,
or to attempt any of these) within the
United States or upon the high seas;
import or export; deliver, receive, carry,
transport, or ship in interstate
commerce in the course of commercial
activity; or sell or offer for sale in
interstate or foreign commerce any
endangered wildlife species. It also is
illegal to possess, sell, deliver, carry,
transport, or ship any such wildlife that
has been taken in violation of the Act.
Certain exceptions apply to agents of the
Service and State conservation agencies.
Permits may be issued to carry out
otherwise prohibited activities
involving endangered wildlife species
under certain circumstances.
Regulations governing permits for
endangered species are codified at 50
CFR 17.22. With regard to endangered
wildlife, a permit may be issued for the
following purposes: For scientific
purposes, to enhance the propagation or
survival of the species, and for
incidental take in connection with
otherwise lawful activities.
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
2249
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the names of the sections
or paragraphs that are unclearly written,
which sections or sentences are too
long, the sections where you feel lists or
tables would be useful, etc.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
We have determined that
environmental assessments and
environmental impact statements, as
defined under the authority of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), need not
be prepared in connection with
regulations adopted under section 4(a)
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited
in this proposed rule is available on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
or upon request from the Branch of
Foreign Species, Endangered Species
Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Author(s)
The primary author of this proposed
rule is Amy Brisendine, Branch of
Foreign Species, Endangered Species
Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
*
Macaw, bluethroated.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Bolivia .....................
*
Entire ......................
*
[FR Doc. 2013–00291 Filed 1–9–13; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 120813331–2562–01]
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
RIN 0648–XC164
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies
Fishery; Proposed Rule To Implement
a Targeted Acadian Redfish Fishery for
Sector Vessels; Reopening of
Comment Period
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:26 Jan 09, 2013
Jkt 229001
This action reopens the
comment period for an Acadian redfishrelated proposed rule that published on
November 8, 2012. The original
comment period closed on November
23, 2012. This action clarifies a bycatch
threshold incorrectly explained in the
proposed rule. The public comment
period is being reopened to solicit
additional public comment on this
correction.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed rule published November 8,
2012 (77 FR 66947), is reopened.
Written comments must be received on
or before January 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2012–0183, by any one of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
When listed
*
Critical
habitat
*
*
....................
*
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction and
reopening of comment period.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
*
*
(h) * * *
*
E
Dated: December 31, 2012.
Rowan W. Gould,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
2. Amend § 17.11(h) by adding a new
entry for ‘‘Macaw, blue-throated’’ in
alphabetical order under BIRDS to the
List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 16 U.S.C.
1531–1544; 16 U.S.C. 4201–4245; Pub. L. 99–
625, 100 Stat. 3500; unless otherwise noted.
Status
*
*
Ara glaucogularis ....
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
■
*
Scientific name
*
PART 17—[AMENDED]
Vertebrate
population where
endangered or
threatened
Historic range
*
BIRDS
Accordingly, we propose to amend
part 17, subchapter B of chapter I, title
50 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
as set forth below:
§ 17.11 Endangered and threatened
wildlife.
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation.
Species
Common name
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
of the Act. We published a notice
outlining our reasons for this
determination in the Federal Register
on October 25, 1983 (48 FR 49244).
*
Special
rules
*
*
NA
NA
*
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20120183, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn: William
Whitmore.
• Mail: Paper, disk, or CD–ROM
comments should be sent to John K.
Bullard, Regional Administrator,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930. Mark the outside of the
envelope: ‘‘Comments on Redfish Rule.’’
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM
10JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2239-2249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00291]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2012-0034; 450 003 0115]
RIN 1018-AY68
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing the Blue-
Throated Macaw
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
list the blue-throated macaw (Ara glaucogularis) as endangered under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). This species is
endemic to a small area in Bolivia, and there are estimated to be fewer
than 150 individuals remaining in the wild. Its population continues to
decrease despite intense conservation efforts. The primary threat to
the species is lack of reproductive success (loss of nestlings) due to
nest failure, which primarily is caused by competition for nest sites
and predation by larger avian species, in addition to diminished
availability of suitable habitat. We seek information from the public
on the proposed listing for this species.
DATES: We will consider comments and information received or postmarked
on or before March 11, 2013. We must receive requests for a public
hearing by February 25, 2013. See Public Hearing section under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit information by one of the following methods:
Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. In the Search field, enter FWS-R9-ES-2012-
0034, which is the docket number for this action. Then click on the
Search button. You may submit a comment by clicking on ``Comment Now.''
If your comments will fit in the provided comment box, please use this
feature of https://www.regulations.gov, as it is most compatible with
our comment review procedures. If you attach your comments as a
separate document, our preferred file format is Microsoft Word. If you
attach multiple comments (such as form letters), our preferred format
is a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel.
By hard copy: U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS-R9-ES-2012-0034, Division of Policy and
Directives Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax
Drive, MS 2042-PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will not accept comments by email or fax. We will post all comments
on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post
any personal information you provide us (see the Information Requested
section, below, for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janine Van Norman, Chief, Branch of
Foreign Species, Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 420, Arlington, VA 22203;
telephone 703-358-2171. If you use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-
877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Requested
We intend that any final actions resulting from this proposed rule
be based on the best scientific and commercial data available.
Therefore, we request comments or information from the Government of
Bolivia, the scientific community, or any other interested parties
concerning this proposed rule. We particularly seek clarifying
information concerning:
(1) Information on taxonomy, distribution, habitat selection and
trends (especially breeding and foraging habitats), diet, and
population abundance and trends (especially current recruitment data)
of this species.
(2) Information on the effects of habitat loss and changing land
uses on
[[Page 2240]]
the distribution and abundance of this species and its principal food
sources over the short and long term.
(3) Information on whether changing climatic conditions (i.e.,
increasing intensity of storms or drought) are affecting the species,
its habitat, or its food sources.
(4) Information on the effects of other potential threat factors,
including live capture and collection, predation by other animals, and
diseases of this species or its principal food sources over the short
and long term.
(5) Information on management programs for its conservation,
including mitigation measures related to conservation programs, and any
other private or governmental conservation programs that benefit this
species.
(6) Genetics and taxonomy.
(7) The factors that are the basis for making a listing
determination for a species under section 4(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.), which are:
(a) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
(b) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes;
(c) Disease or predation;
(d) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
(e) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence.
Please include sufficient information with your submission (such as
full references) to allow us to verify any scientific or commercial
information you include. Submissions merely stating support for or
opposition to the action under consideration without providing
supporting information, although noted, will not be considered in
making a determination. Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that
determinations as to whether any species is an endangered or threatened
species must be made ``solely on the basis of the best scientific and
commercial data available.''
Public Hearing
At this time, we do not have a public hearing scheduled for this
proposed rule. The main purpose of most public hearings is to obtain
public testimony or comment. In most cases, it is sufficient to submit
comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, described above in the
ADDRESSES section. If you would like to request a public hearing for
this proposed rule, you must submit your request, in writing, to the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by the
date specified above in DATES.
Previous Federal Actions
On May 6, 1991, we received a petition (1991 petition) from Alison
Stattersfield, of the International Council for Bird Preservation
(ICBP), to list 53 foreign birds under the Act, including the blue-
throated macaw, which is the subject of this proposed rule. We took
several actions on this petition. On December 16, 1991, we made a
positive 90-day finding and announced the initiation of a status review
of the species included in the 1991 petition (56 FR 65207, published
December 16, 1991). On March 28, 1994 (59 FR 14496), we published a 12-
month finding on the 1991 petition. In that document, we announced our
finding that listing 38 species from the 1991 petition, including the
blue-throated macaw, was warranted but precluded because of other
listing actions. The blue-throated macaw was assigned a listing
priority number (LPN) of 2. Species are assigned LPNs based on the
magnitude and immediacy of threats, as well as their taxonomic status.
The lower the LPN, the higher priority that species is for us to
determine appropriate action using our available resources. An LPN of 2
reflects threats that are both imminent and high in magnitude, as well
as the taxonomic classification of the blue-throated macaw as a full
species.
Previously published petition findings, listing rules, status
reviews, and petition finding reviews that included foreign species are
listed in the Annual Notice of Review (ANOR) that published on May 3,
2011 (76 FR 25150). In our ANORs, we announce our annual petition
findings for foreign species, as required under section 4(b)(3)(C)(i)
of the Act. When, in response to a petition, we find that listing a
species is warranted but precluded by higher priority listing actions,
we must review the status of the species each year until we publish a
proposed rule or make a determination that listing is not warranted.
These subsequent status reviews and the accompanying 12-month findings
are referred to as ``resubmitted'' petition findings. In the May 3,
2011, ANOR, we announced that listing was warranted but precluded for
20 foreign species, including the blue-throated macaw, which is the
subject of this proposed rule. Additional information on this species
may be found in that ANOR.
Background
Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that determinations as to
whether any species is an endangered or threatened species must be made
``solely on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data
available.''
In this document, we propose to add this species as endangered to
the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. Prior to
issuing a final determination on this proposed action, we will take
into consideration all comments and any additional information we
receive. Such information may lead to a final rule that differs from
this proposal. All comments and recommendations, including names and
addresses of commenters, will become part of the administrative record.
Species Information
Taxonomy
The taxonomic status of this species was disputed until fairly
recently. The blue-throated macaw was previously considered an aberrant
form of the blue-and-yellow macaw (A. ararauna), but these two species
are known to occur sympatrically (in the same location) without
interbreeding (Kyle 2007a; del Hoyo et al. 1997). Common names in
Spanish for the blue-throated macaw include guacamayo barba azul and
guacamayo caninde. Both BirdLife International (BLI) and the Integrated
Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) recognize the blue-throated macaw
as Ara glaucogularis. ITIS (www.itis.gov) is a database maintained by a
partnership of U.S., Canadian, and Mexican federal government agencies,
other organizations, and taxonomic specialists to provide taxonomic
information. Therefore, we accept the species as Ara glaucogularis.
Population
When the blue-throated macaw population was investigated as of
1998, the species was located in eight locations and the population was
believed to be 100-150 individuals (Loro Parque Fundaci[oacute]n (LPF)
2002, p. 13). The estimate provided by BirdLife International indicates
that the total wild population is estimated to be 73-87 mature
individuals (BLI 2012), which is a decrease from an estimate of between
50 and 300 birds when our previous ANOR was published. In October 2004,
a small new population was found at Santa Rosa, 100 km (62 mi) west of
locations believed to be the western-most edge of its range (LPF 2012;
Herrera et al. 2007, p. 18). Biologists surveying for this species in
2004 found more birds than in previous surveys by searching specific
habitat types (palm groves and forested islands) (Herrera et al. 2007,
p. 18). In 2007, a population of approximately 25
[[Page 2241]]
individuals was found one hour south of Trinidad (Kyle 2007a, p. 6).
Also in 2007, a flock of approximately 70 birds was observed near the
Rio Mamor[eacute] (Asociaci[oacute]n Armon[iacute]a), in the vicinity
of where the Barba Azul Nature Reserve is now.
In and around the Barba Azul Nature Reserve, there are believed to
be approximately 100 individuals (Herrera 2012, pers. comm.; Kingsbury
et al. 2010, p. 70). Currently, experts working locally with this
species estimate that there are between 115 and 250 birds known to
remain in the wild (Herrera 2012, pers. comm.; Gilardi 2012 pers.
comm.). LPF's 2010 annual report (p. 15), stated that approximately 300
individuals were believed to remain in the wild. However, this may be
an overestimate--the population found at the Barba Azul Nature Reserve
may be the same birds that are monitored in the southern and eastern
parts of its range during the breeding season; it is likely the
population is nearer to 115 individuals (Gilardi 2012 pers. comm.).
In captivity, more than over 1,000 individual blue-throated macaws
are likely held worldwide according to the 2011 North American Regional
Studbook (Anderson 2011, p. 4).
Species Description
Blue-throated macaws have a blue throat, a bare, white face
containing identifiable blue-streaks, dark grey irises, and a large
black bill (Anderson 2011, p. 4; Kyle 2007b, p. 16). Its forehead is
also blue and there is a lack of contrast between its remiges (large
flight feathers on the wing) and upperwing coverts. This species is
approximately the same size (85 cm or 33 inches) as the blue-and-yellow
macaw. However, blue-throated macaws are not as competitive as the
blue-and-yellow macaw in obtaining nesting cavities (Kyle 2007a). Male
blue-throated macaws are larger than females at about 800 grams (1.76
pounds), and females weigh approximately 600 grams (1.32 pounds) (Kyle
2007b, p. 16).
Blue-throated macaws, like other parrot species, are monogamous and
tend to mate for life. There is also a significant investment in the
care for their young--blue-throated macaws are not fully independent of
their parents for a full year (Berkunsky 2010, p. 5). Therefore, some
breeding pairs may not produce nestlings every breeding season. The
blue-throated macaw forms its nests in large tree cavities; its
preferred nesting tree is the motac[uacute] palm (Attalea phalerata),
which is native to Bolivia, Brazil, and Peru. The northern population
of blue-throated macaws breeds between August to November, and the
southern population breeds between November to March (Berkunsky 2012
pers. comm.; Kyle 2007a). The southern population, an hour south of
Trinidad, tends to breed around the same time as the more commonly
found blue-and-gold macaw. This overlap of breeding seasons adds to
competition for nest sites. Blue-throated macaws are sexually mature
between 6 and 8 years (Strem 2008; Kyle 2007a, p. 6). Females lay one
to three eggs per clutch and incubate for 26 days. One to three
hatchlings are raised, depending on food availability (BLI 2010; Kyle
2007a). Nestlings fledge between 13 and 14 weeks. Blue-throated macaws
are seen traveling mostly in pairs but also have been seen in a large
flock of between 70 and 100 individuals (Herrera 2012, pers. comm.;
Macleod et al. 2009, p. 15; Waugh 2007a, p. 53).
Diet
This species seeks areas where palm fruits and suitable nesting
cavities are readily available (Herrera et al. 2007, pp. 18-24). It
feeds on fruits of approximately 12 species of trees (Kyle 2007a, pp.
1-10). There are 84 species of palms in Bolivia (Moraes et al. 2001, p.
234) and approximately 11 palm species within the blue-throated macaw's
range. Blue-throated macaws prefer the fleshy part of the fruit, or
mesocarp, of motac[uacute], Mauritia flexuosa (royal palms or carandai-
guaz[uacute]), and Acrocomia aculeata (common names include: Coyoli
palm, gru-gru palm, macaw palm, acrocome, Coyolipalme, amankayo,
corojo, corozo, baboso, tucuma, and totai) (Herrera 2007, p. 20;
Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144; Jordan and Munn 1993; www.ars-grin.gov, www.pacsoa.org.au). The macaws first puncture the apex of the
mesocarp and remove the outer layer (Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997,
p. 144). The motac[uacute] continually produces fruit throughout the
year. Between 80 and 90 percent of motac[uacute] palms produce fruits
all year, but its peak is between July and December (LPF 2003, p. 21;
Moraes et al. 1996, p. 424). Motac[uacute] is believed to be pollinated
by beetles in the Mystrops genus (Moraes et al. 1996, p. 425). The same
palm tree may produce at any one time between three and five racemes
(flowering stalks, each with fruits in a different stage of development
ripeness) (Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144).
The species has also been observed at clay licks (Kyle 2007a, p.
2), which are clay banks where they consume soil or minerals; however,
the reason for the clay consumption remains unclear.
Range and Habitat Description
The blue-throated macaw is endemic to the tropical savanna
ecoregion of north-central Bolivia in the Department of Beni (LPF 2010;
Kingsbury 2010, p. 8). This ecoregion is approximately 160,000 square
kilometers (km\2\) (61,776 square miles (mi\2\)). (See Appendix A in
Docket no. FWS-R9-ES-2012-0034 at https://www.regulations.gov for a map
of the region (hereinafter referred to as ``Appendix A'')). Within this
region, the blue-throated macaw is found mostly in widely dispersed
isolated pairs within an area estimated to be between 8,000 and 12,900
km\2\ (3,089 and 4,981 mi\2\), (LPF 2012; BLI 2012; Hesse 2000, p.
104). The species is found at elevations between 200 and 300 m (656 and
984 ft) (Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144; Brace et al. 1995).
The blue-throated macaw's habitat was occupied by humans for thousands
of years before European colonization (Erickson 2000, p. 2). Its
habitat consists of lowlands in an area known as Llanos (plains) de
Mojos, also known as Llanos de Moxos (LPF 2010; Mayle et al. 2007, p.
301; Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 141). See Appendix A for a
photo representing the flooded habitat. The Llanos de Mojos is a wide
savannah plain with poor drainage and in the wet season is extremely
susceptible to flooding. The floods cover large areas of the plains and
the area may remain flooded for 5 to 7 months in some areas. These
plains include parts of the river basins of the It[eacute]nez,
Mamor[eacute], Beni, and Madre de Dios Rivers (see Appendix A for a
map; Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144).
The blue-throated macaw's habitat has progressively diminished over
thousands of years and its habitat is now primarily restricted to small
``islands'' of suitable habitat within privately-owned cattle pastures
(see Appendix A in Docket no. FWS-R9-ES-2012-0034 at https://www.regulations.gov for a photo illustrating these islands; Milpacher
2012 personal communication; Kingsbury 2010, p. 72; Berkunsky 2008, p.
4; Kyle 2007a, p. 4; Kyle 2006, p. 7; LPF 2003, p. 6). The species has
been observed in the Barba Azul Nature Reserve. The blue-throated macaw
is believed to occur on ranches adjacent to the Barba Azul Nature
Reserve, Ranches Las Gamas, Los Patos, Pelotal, and Juan Latino, but
the status of the species is unclear in these areas (Kingsbury 2010, p.
89). In other parts of the species' range, the species is believed to
occur on the ranches Elsner with Esp[iacute]ritu, San Rafael, and the
Estancia El Dorado, however, to the best of our knowledge,
[[Page 2242]]
these are privately managed and the species is not being monitored on
the ranches.
Palm Islands
Palm-dominated forest islands form the blue-throated macaw's
primary habitat. These ``islands'' are on elevated terrain and are
sometimes referred to as ``alturas'' (high ground). The islands were
primarily formed as mounds resulting from prehistoric human existence
in this region (Erickson 2008, pp. 168-169). The lowlands are
frequently inundated by water due to the flooding of nearby rivers (see
Appendix A). Historically, human cultures manipulated the water flow to
create plains that were higher and subsequently drier (Erickson 2008,
pp. 168-169). The mounds are common throughout the savannas and
wetlands of Bolivia; there may be as many as 10,000 of these mounds or
islands in Bolivia (Erickson 2008, p. 169). They have been found to
vary in size from a few hectares to many square kilometers (Erickson
2008, pp. 168-169; Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144). Most are
raised less than one meter and are often surrounded by ponds or moat-
like ditches (Erickson 2008, pp. 168-169). Typically, these islands are
surrounded by seasonally-flooded grasslands. These islands are between
0.2-1.0 ha (0.49-2.47 ac) in size and are approximately 130-235 meters
(426-771 feet) above sea level (Kingsbury et al. 2010, p. 71; Yamashita
and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144).
Besides motac[uacute], palm species found on these islands are
typically Syagrus botriophora (sumuqu[eacute]), and Astrocaryum vulgare
(chontilla), interspersed with semi-deciduous emergent trees such as
Enterolobium cortisiliqun (parota or orej[oacute]n), Sterculia striata
(no common name (NCN)) and Tabebuia heptaphilla (Lapacho negro), and
the Curupau tree (Anadenanthera colubrina) (also known as yopo, vilca,
huilco, wilco, cebil, or angico) (Kyle 2005, p. 7). Some trees such as
Ceiba pentandra (mapajo or kapok tree) and Hura crepitans (common names
include catahua, Ochoo, arbol del diablo, acacu, monkey's dinner-bell,
habillo, ceiba de leche, sandbox tree, possum wood, dynamite tree,
ceiba blanca, assacu, and posentri) can reach more than 40 m (131 ft)
in height.
The motac[uacute] palms may have survived on the mound islands for
various reasons--their value to human cultures, their resistance to
burning, and their ecological suitability to the microclimate.
Motac[uacute] is not only vital to the life history of blue-throated
macaws; it also has local, commercial, and ecosystem importance (Kyle
2005, p. 3; Moraes et al. 1996, pp. 424-425). This species of palm is
used in the local community as thatch for housing which can last up to
seven years. Its fruit is consumed by humans and various other species,
and parts of the palm tree are used to make baskets, brooms, and is
sold commercially as palm oil (Zambrana et al. 2007, p. 2785; Moraes et
al. 1996, pp. 425-426).
Significance of Palm Islands to Blue-Throated Macaws
Habitat favored by blue-throated macaws contains tall, mature trees
in areas with continuous motac[uacute] palm fruit production (Yamashita
and M. de Barros 1997, p. 145). Densities of motac[uacute], the blue-
throated macaw's preferred nesting and feeding source, vary greatly. In
the 1997 Yamashita and M. de Barros study, macaws were only observed in
areas where motac[uacute] represented more than 60 percent of the
trees.
Natural cavities in dead or decaying trees (usually motac[uacute]
palms) are the primary source of nesting sites for this species. Blue-
throated macaws prefer dead trees that have cavities with a minimum
internal diameter of 30 cm (11.8 in) for nesting, and, therefore, the
tree must have a diameter at breast height of 60 cm (23.6 in) or
greater (see Appendix A for a picture representing a tree cavity;
Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 145).
Factors Affecting the Species
Section 4 of the Act, and its implementing regulations at 50 CFR
part 424, set forth the procedures for adding species to the Federal
Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Under section
4(a)(1) of the Act, we may list a species based on any of the following
five factors: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification,
or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C)
disease or predation; (D) the inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; and (E) other natural or manmade factors affecting its
continued existence. Listing actions may be warranted based on any of
the above factors, singly or in combination. Each of these factors is
evaluated and a summary is presented in this document.
Loss of Palm Islands Due to Habitat Conversion
Within the past few hundred years, the blue-throated macaw lost
much of its remaining habitat due to conversion of palm forests to
pasture for cattle grazing. Cattle are not native to Bolivia; they were
introduced to Bolivia in the 1600s. After the Second World War, cattle
ranching and the associated burning of pastures began to have a
significant impact on the landscape (Robison et al. 2000, p. 61). The
macaw's preferred habitat is now limited to a few small, isolated
islands of suitable habitat which are surrounded by these cattle
ranches (Gilardi 2012 pers. comm.). During the flooding season which
can occur up to six months of a year, cattle take refuge on the
motac[uacute] palm islands because the islands are drier due to their
higher elevation (LPF 2003, p. 33). Adding to habitat loss, in the
preferred habitat of the blue-throated macaw where these motac[uacute]
palms remain (within privately-owned cattle ranches), local ranchers
typically burn the pastures annually (Berkunsky 2008, p. 4; del Hoyo
1997). This type of burning results in almost no recruitment of native
palm trees, which are vital to the ecological needs of the blue-
throated macaw (Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144). The reduction
in habitat (reduced availability of motac[uacute] palms) and lack of
recruitment of motac[uacute] palms is a concern for the future because
it takes several years for motac[uacute] palms to be able to produce
fruit and to develop into a size suitable for nesting cavities. As
mitigation, there are local conservation efforts to attempt to not only
plant trees that provide food for blue-throated macaws, as well as
education efforts directed towards land-owners within the range of the
blue-throated macaws.
The lack of nesting cavities (suitable habitat) is often a limiting
factor for bird species that depend on these cavities for nesting
(Sandoval and Barrantes 2009, p. 75; Kyle 2006, p. 8). Blue-throated
macaws requires specific nesting cavities for raising their young which
provide an environment where they are safe from predation and flooding.
Additionally, many different species compete for nest sites because
there is a lack of suitable nest sites in the Llanos de Mojos due to
habitat loss. This loss of suitable trees has resulted in increased
competition from other species for these nesting cavities as well. The
loss of habitat has contributed to other factors that affect blue-
throated macaws such as an increase in vulnerability to predation,
extreme weather events, and competition for nests, which are discussed
below.
Nest Failure
Nest failure (the failure of nestlings to survive to fledgling
stage) continues for various reasons, despite intensive conservation
efforts (Berkunsky 2010, p.
[[Page 2243]]
4; Kyle 2006, p. 8). Some of the primary causes of nest failure have
been predation, infestation by botflies (parasites in the Philornis
genus), exposure to severe weather events such as flooding, and
competition with other species such as bees (Berkunsky 2010, pp. 4-5).
Many nestlings die in early developmental stages, often due to
starvation (due to lack of food and parental neglect), exposure to cold
temperatures, or flooding (Kyle 2007a, pp. 1-10). If parents do not
have access to enough nutritional food sources, some nestlings are
neglected so that their other nestlings will survive. Sometimes
nestlings can also fall out of collapsed trees before they have
fledged. During five field seasons of closely observing nest sites,
often 50 percent of nestlings died (Berkunsky 2008, p. 5; Kyle 2007a,
pp. 7-8). See additional discussion below under Exposure to extreme
weather events section.
Predation
Predation stands out as one of the main reasons why this species'
population is not increasing (Kyle 2007a, pp. 3, 6-7; Kyle 2006, p. 8).
As an example, during one season, of the seven active blue-throated
macaw nests found, all of the nestlings within three nests were lost to
predation (Kyle 2007a, pp. 6-8). Because the species has such a small
population size with likely fewer than 150 remaining in the wild),
losses such as this have a significant effect. Predators of the blue-
throated macaw include:
Toco toucan (Ramphastos toco),
Crane hawk (Geranospiza caerulescens),
Great-horned owl (Bubo virginianus), and
Southern crested caracara (Caracara plancus, a bird of prey).
The blue-throated macaws' habitat of sparse, palm-forested islands
scattered among natural grasslands, is especially vulnerable to nest
predation (Kyle 2007a, pp. 6-7). Tree nest cavities chosen by blue-
throated macaws tend to be very visible to other avian species flying
overhead. In addition to choosing nests in palm islands, blue-throated
macaws are also known to nest in isolated palms in open fields, which
are even more exposed than nesting in palm islands (Herrera et al.
2007, p. 20). All of the species that predate on adult blue-throated
macaws, eggs, or nestlings have large distributions and are commonly
found at the habitat islands used by blue-throated macaws (Kyle 2007a,
pp. 6-7). Great horned owls have been seen at almost every site where
blue-throated macaws are nesting and monitored (Kyle 2007a, p. 6).
These owls, native to South America, have a vast range, are the most
widely distributed owl in South America, and occupy a variety of
habitats including open forest, farmland, and grassland.
Because blue-throated macaw nests are concentrated in these small
``islands'' of trees within cattle pastures, they are more easily
located by predators than species that nest in a continuous forest
setting. To discourage and mitigate the effects of predation, some
conservation activities being conducted include the monitoring and
discouragement of predators from attacking blue-throated macaw nests.
These efforts are extremely intensive for each nest. In one case, where
it appeared the nest tree was collapsing, the tree was monitored all
night by conservation staff (Kyle 2007a, p. 9). Often trees containing
active nests are monitored in this way if persistent predation has been
observed. The mitigation efforts are helpful--if nestlings can survive
until they are at least 300 grams (0.66 pounds), they have a greater
chance of survival (Kyle 2007a, p. 7).
Botfly parasites can also cause mortality of nestlings and have
been observed in blue-throated macaw nestlings. Botflies live
subcutaneously, and feed on macaws before pupating (Wunderle Jr. and
Arendt 2011, p. 39). Botflies significantly reduce the energy available
for nestling growth and development (Uhazy and Arendt 1986 in Wunderle
Jr. and Arendt 2011, p. 39) and can cause high death rates of
nestlings. In one study of avian nestlings, botfly parasitism caused 56
percent of mortalities while egg and chick losses from nest predators
and competitors accounted for less than 10 percent of reproductive
failures (Arendt 2000 in Wunderle Jr. and Arendt 2011, p. 39).
Exposure to Extreme Weather Events
Due to their preferred nesting location, blue-throated macaws are
also vulnerable to natural catastrophic events such as flooding,
drought, and other stochastic disturbances (Kyle 2006, pp. 5-6).
Bolivia is described as a ``climatically volatile region'' and is one
of the countries in the world most affected by natural disasters in
recent years (Oxfam International 2009, p. 5). This species' habitat
experiences radical changes over the course of a year.
For many months of the year its habitat is flooded, and other times
during the year, its habitat suffers from severe drought. High rainfall
occurs during the summer months; the wet season is between September
and May. Annual precipitation is between 1,100-2,500 millimeters (43-98
inches) (Haase & Beck 1989 in Kingsbury 2010, p. 9). Very heavy periods
of rainfall in this region can continue for long periods of time (Kyle
2006, pp. 5-6; Hanagarth and Sarmiento 1990 in Beck and Moraes,
undated). Every 6-12 years, 80-90 percent of the region is inundated
(Beck and Moraes, undated). This cyclical flooding may be an El
Ni[ntilde]o event, but there has been no study correlating the
phenomena (Mayle et al. 2007, p. 294, Beck and Moraes, undated).
Although these areas are seasonally-flooded, they are also prone to
periods of drought (Kyle 2007a, p. 3, Mayle et al. 2007, p. 294;
Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144).
Severe storms, such as one that occurred in 2005 are described as
``nest killers.'' These severe storms cause the dead palm trees in
which the nests have been constructed to collapse or flood (Kyle 2007b,
p. 15) which causes nest failure for the season and subsequently no
recruitment. During periods of drought, nestlings are sometimes
neglected and starve. Heavy storms and rain contribute to nest failure;
if nestlings are exposed to cold weather and rain, they may die.
Dead palm trees often collapse in these storms. During the 2006-
2007 season, this phenomenon was observed when the nest of one blue-
throated macaw pair in a motac[uacute] dead palm tree collapsed due to
strong winds (Kyle 2007a, p. 4). Although the reason is unclear, these
dead palm trees are currently the preferred sites for nest construction
by the blue-throated macaw and they have strong nest site fidelity
(Berkunsky 2012 pers. comm.). The extent this behavior is learned and
modified is also unclear. However, researchers are working with this
species to introduce nest sites that are safer and less prone to
predation and nest failure due to extreme weather events such as
flooding (Berkunsky 2010, pp. 4-5). Flooding, a significant cause of
nest failure in the recent past, is reported not to have occurred in
nests that have been intensely monitored and human-manipulated since
2008. This is due to one of the conservation measures in place:
drilling drain holes in the nests and at the bottom of the dead palm
trees in order to prevent nest flooding. However, flooding can still
occur if nests are not monitored and manipulated.
Competition for Nest Sites
In addition to nest failure, there is a shortage of nests. As
described above, there is little remaining of the preferred habitat of
motacu palms. The species appears to ``learn'' nesting sites, and
[[Page 2244]]
will re-use nesting locations that they had used in the past (Berkunsky
2010; Kyle 2007a, p. 4). Although it is unclear why blue-throated
macaws choose to nest in the top of dead motac[uacute] palms and are
subsequently exposed to predation, competition from other species for
nests, drought, excessive rainfall and nest flooding, it is their
preferred nesting tree because it provides easy access to their
preferred food source. Many species, in addition to the blue-throated
macaw, use the motac[uacute] palm for feeding and nesting. In the
Llanos de Mojos, there are 21 species of parrots which may compete for
nest sites (Kingsbury et. al. 2010, p. 83; Yamashita and M. de Barros
1997, p. 144). Some species known to compete for nest sites with the
blue-throated macaw include the blue and gold macaw, woodpeckers, and
bees (Kyle 2007a, p. 6; LPF 2003, p. 33).
In order to provide more choices for nesting habitat, conservation
organizations are installing nest boxes. n 2009, in the Barba Azul
Nature Reserve, 46 artificial nests were monitored, in part by video
cameras; however, the majority of them (24 nests) were occupied by blue
and gold macaws (LPF 2010, p. 15). Likely due to the larger size of the
blue and gold macaw or perhaps their more aggressive nature, the blue
and gold macaws usually win most confrontations for nests (Kyle 2007a,
p. 6). During the 2010 field study at the Barba Azul Nature Reserve,
researchers also observed that there were a greater number of blue and
gold macaws using the Barba Azul Nature Reserve than blue-throated
macaws (Kingsbury 2010, p. 83). At an area where both species were
drinking water, researchers noted that the blue-throated macaws
exhibited agitated behavior when blue and yellow macaws were nearby
(Kingsbury 2010, p. 83). Although the Barba Azul Nature Reserve was
established specifically for the blue-throated macaws, other species
use the reserve and compete for nesting sites.
To mitigate this problem, at least two conservation organizations
are installing nest boxes to create more available sites for nesting,
but despite the past 10 years of conservation efforts and
experimentation with nest boxes, nest failure still occurs. In addition
to predation, other reasons for nest failure are numerous, which has
instigated the experimentation and installation of these nest boxes.
Bees and other species continue to compete with blue-throated macaws
for these nest boxes. After many years of experimentation, the nest
boxes are slowly becoming more effective at providing suitable nesting
sites. The blue-throated macaws seem to habituate to certain nesting
sites and locations likely based on food availability and learned
behavior.
Although blue-throated macaws have begun to use some of the nest
boxes, it has been a slow and tedious process to encourage blue-
throated macaws to use these boxes, and the population continues to
suffer losses, particularly due to nest failure, which the installation
of suitable nest boxes is attempting to alleviate. When nests fail (no
nestlings survive that season), a significant amount of effort has been
expended by that breeding pair. Because this species has such a small
population (likely there are less than 150 individuals remaining), each
time a nestling survives to become an adult, it is extremely
significant to the population. Macaws tend to mate for life, so each
individual blue-throated macaw is extremely valuable to the population,
particularly. The species also cares for its young over two seasons, so
each pair of macaws invests a significant amount of energy into its
young. The effect of the death of each new nestling on the population
of blue-throated macaws is devastating to the viability of the
population. If the nestlings survive the first season to the point they
fledge, their chances of survival are much greater than when they are
new nestlings when they are entirely dependent on their parents for
survival.
Bees can also make both natural nesting cavities and man-made nest
boxes inhospitable for blue-throated macaws (Berkunsky 2008, p. 5). At
the beginning of one breeding season, 67 percent of nest boxes
monitored were occupied by bees (Berkunsky 2008, p. 5). After being
removed, bees had returned within 2 weeks. Most naturally occurring
nest sites, because there are so few of them and they are in demand by
numerous species, require intense monitoring and manipulation in order
to maintain an attractive, suitable environment for the blue-throated
macaws for nesting.
Disease
Macaws are susceptible to many bacterial, parasitic, and viral
diseases, particularly in captive environments (Kistler et al. 2009, p.
2,176; Portaels et al. 1996, p. 319; Bennett et al. 1991). Macaws are
prone to many viral infections such as retrovirus, pox virus, and
paramyxo virus which can cause weakened immune systems and subsequent
death (Gaskin 1989, pp. 249, 251, 252). Recently, histopathological
examination revealed the likely presence of the pox virus in dead blue-
throated macaw nestlings, indicating that close contact between blue-
throated macaws and domestic poultry may be facilitating pathogen
transmission to this highly vulnerable species (Wildlife Conservation
Society (WCS) in litt. 2011). In one location within the very limited
range of the blue-throated macaw, blue-throated macaws share water
sources with chickens, ducks, and other avian species (WCS in litt.
2011; Kingsbury 2010, p. 83). Blue-throated macaws in this area are
being closely monitored to decrease the possibility of transmission of
the pox virus; however, it is still a concern.
Proventricular dilatation disease (PDD) is one of the worst
diseases known to affect parrots (Kistler et al. 2008, p. 2). PDD, also
known as avian bornavirus (ABV) or macaw wasting disease, is a fatal
disease that poses a serious threat to all domesticated and wild
parrots worldwide, particularly those with very small populations
(Kistler et al. 2008, p. 1; Abramson et al. 1995, p. 288). This
contagious disease causes damage to the nerves of the upper digestive
tract, so that food digestion and absorption are negatively affected.
The disease has a 100-percent mortality rate in affected birds,
although the exact manner of transmission between birds is unclear
(Kistler et al. 2008, p. 1). PDD has been documented in several
continents in more than 50 different parrot species and in free-ranging
species in at least five other orders of birds (Kistler et al. 2008, p.
2). This disease is somewhat concerning because blue-throated macaws
share water sources with other species of birds, and this disease could
be transmitted between individuals that are within close range.
This species is closely monitored in the wild; conservationists
working with this species are taking precautions so that diseases are
not introduced into the wild population. Despite close monitoring and
precautions, disease is likely to affect this extremely small
population; therefore, we are concerned that diseases will become
problematic to this species in the wild.
Small Population Size
An additional factor that affects the continued existence of this
species is its small, declining population of likely less than 150
individuals. Recently, two disturbing observations have been made:
Malformations in chicks and reduced fertility in many reproductive
pairs (WCS in litt. 2011). Small, rapidly declining populations of
species, combined with other threats such as reduced reproductive
success, leads to an increased risk of extinction (Harris and Pimm
2008, p. 169). This species
[[Page 2245]]
faces many challenges--it has many predators, limited suitable habitat,
and competition from other species for nest sites, in addition to its
small population size. Any loss of potentially reproducing individuals
could have a devastating effect on the ability of the population to
increase. Small populations have a higher risk of extinction due to
random environmental events (Shaffer 1981, p. 131; Gilpin and Soule
1986, pp. 24-28; Shaffer 1987, pp. 69-75). Because of its small
population and restricted range, the blue throated macaw is vulnerable
to random environmental events; in particular, it is threatened by
extreme precipitation events and nest flooding.
Removal From the Wild
Removal of parrots from the wild over the past few hundred years
contributed to this species' small population size ((LPF 2012; Herrera
and Hennessey 2009, p. 233; Kyle 2007a). Macaws, both live and dead,
have been a significant part of Bolivian culture for thousands of
years. Evidence of this exists in pre-Colombian Andean feather art
(American Museum of Natural History 2012). Feathers have been used
historically in headdresses; and parrots have been used in ceremonial
sacrifices (American Museum of Natural History 2012; Berdan 2004, p. 4;
Creel and McKusick 1994, pp. 510-511). Feathers of blue-throated macaws
would still be used for headdresses today if it were not for
intervention and education programs implemented by nongovernmental
conservation organizations (NGOs) (BLI 2012; LPF 2010; LPF 2003, p.
29). In addition to being used in ceremonies and costumes, there is
evidence that parrots have been household pets since at least A.D. 1000
(Creel and McKusick 1994, pp. 513-515) as evidenced in burial remains;
and live macaws very likely had commercial value even during that time
period. Parrots were traded over long distances; archeological remains
indicate that parrots were found well outside their native range (Creel
and McKusick 1994, pp. 515-516).
The most significant impact to the decline of this species'
population was likely due to collection for museums during the late
1800s and early 1900s (Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144). During
this time period, bird-skin traders of European descent sold thousands
of bird skins, especially to museums in the United States for at least
three generations (Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History 2012;
Yamashita and M. de Barros 1997, p. 144; Trimble 1936, pp. 41-43).
The Inadequacy of Existing Regulatory Mechanisms
Under the Act, we are required to evaluate the whether the existing
regulatory mechanisms are adequate. There are limited legal mechanisms
in place to protect this species (de la Torre et. al. 2011, p. 334;
Herrera and Hennessey 2007, p. 295; LPF 2003, p. 6-7). This species is
considered critically endangered by the International Union for
Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (BLI 2012; LPF 2012). However, IUCN
rankings do not confer any actual protection or management. This
species is listed in Appendix I of CITES (CITES 2012), which, along
with the ban by the Bolivian Government in 1984 to export this species,
effectively limits international trade (LPF 2012; Herrera and Hennessey
2009, p. 233-234; LPF Recovery Plan 2003, p. 7). CITES Appendix I
includes species that are ``threatened with extinction which are or may
be affected by trade.'' Species listed under Appendix I may not be
traded for primarily commercial purposes. These protections were put in
place because the species had suffered substantial population declines
throughout its range due to habitat destruction and overexploitation.
Within Bolivia, the government of Bolivia has enacted various laws and
regulatory mechanisms to protect and manage wildlife and their
habitats. For example, the Bolivian Government prohibits and takes
sanctions against the possession and the traffic of any protected
species such as the blue-throated macaw (LPF Recovery Plan 2003, p. 7).
Further, a study published in 2011 noted that many institutional
changes have occurred in recent years in Bolivia (de la Torre et al.
2011, p. 332). However, even after the export of this species was
prohibited in the 1980s and despite the laws in place and the intense
conservation efforts ongoing for this species, the species' population
has not recovered and some localized illegal trade is still occurring.
International trade in this species is now negligible (https://www.unep-wcmc.org, accessed June 4, 2012). International trade of the
blue-throated macaw was initially restricted by the listing of the
species in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in 1981, and in
1983, the species was transferred from Appendix II to Appendix I. CITES
regulates international trade in animal and plant species listed under
the Convention. For additional information on CITES, visit https://www.cites.org/. Between 1981 and 1985, 134 Blue-throated Macaws were
reported to have been exported to the United States (TRAFFIC 1987 in
Herrera and Hennessey 2007, p. 296). However, no specimens of blue-
throated macaws have been exported from Bolivia since 1984 when Bolivia
banned the export of this species (https://www.unep-wcmc.org, accessed
June 4, 2012).
Although international trade is not a concern, poaching for local
sale continues to occur (LPF 2012; Herrera and Hennessey 2009, p. 233;
Kyle 2007a). Although Bolivia banned the export of live parrots in 1984
(Brace et al. 1995, pp. 27-28), localized illegal trade within South
America continued to occur, although it became less frequent (Herrera
and Hennessey 2009, p. 233). For example, in 1993, investigators
reported that an Argentinean bird dealer was offering Bolivian dealers
a ``high price'' for blue-throated macaws (Jordan and Munn 1993, p.
695).
More recently, a study of markets in Santa Cruz, Bolivia estimated
that over 22,000 individuals of 31 parrot species were illegally traded
during 2004-2005 despite Bolivian laws (Herrera and Hennessey 2007, p.
298). Bolivian Law 1333 (Ministerio de Desarrollo Sostenible y
Planificacion 1999), Article 111 states that all persons involved in
trade, capture, and transportation without authorization of wild
animals will suffer a two-year prison sentence together with a fine
equivalent to 100 percent of the value of the animal. This law is
supported by an addendum that states that all threatened species are of
national importance and must be protected (Herrera and Hennessey 2007,
p. 295). Asociaci[oacute]n Armon[iacute]a (a nonprofit organization in
Bolivia) monitored the trade of wild birds that passed through a pet
market in Santa Cruz, Bolivia, from periods between July 2004 to
December 2007 (Herrera and Hennessey 2009, p. 233; Herrera and
Hennessey 2007, p. 295). During the 2004-2005 study period, none of the
parrots found were blue-throated macaws. In 2006, two blue-throated
macaws were found for sale (Herrera and Hennessey 2009, p. 233).
However, the blue-throated macaw was absent in the market during the
monitoring period prior to 2006 and no blue-throated macaws were found
for sale in this market in 2007 (Herrera and Hennessey 2009, p. 233;
Herrera and Hennessey 2007, p. 295). This absence of the species in the
market may be due either to the effectiveness of the ongoing
conservation programs and laws in Bolivia, or it may be indicative of
the scarcity of blue-throated macaws in the wild. Ninety-four percent
of the birds
[[Page 2246]]
documented were believed to be wild-caught. This illegal activity
occurs despite the national laws that ban unauthorized trade (Herrera
and Hennessey 2007, p. 298).
The high value of this species could lead to continued illegal
trade. An Internet search indicated that captive-bred specimens of this
species sell for between $1,500 and $3,000 in the United States
(www.hoobly.com, accessed September 13, 2010). One search advertised
that this is a ``very rare species and there are only 300 left in the
wild.'' However, alternatively, because these birds are not difficult
to breed in captivity, the supply of captive-bred birds has increased
which some experts believe may be alleviating illegal collection of
wild birds (Waugh 2007a).
Removal of blue-throated macaws from the wild can have a
particularly devastating effect given their low reproductive rate, and
slow recovery from various environmental pressures (Lee 2010, p. 3;
Wright et al. 2001, p. 711). In situations where the population is very
small and the species is adding new individuals to the population at
such a slow rate (due to high nestling mortality), any unauthorized
removal from the wild will have a significant effect on the species'
population. Some blue-throated macaws have even been used for fish bait
(Kyle 2007a, p. 7). The remains of a blue-throated macaw were found
near a lake stuffed into a tree cavity with a bag of salt (Kyle 2007a,
p. 7). Because this species has so few individuals remaining, any
removal from the wild is extremely detrimental to the survival of the
species when taken into consideration with all of the other factors
acting upon the species.
In-Situ Conservation
This species is considered by many organizations to be the most
endangered macaw remaining in the wild (BLI 2012; World Parrot Trust
(WPT) 2012; LPF 2010, LPF 2003, p. 4). Several NGCOs are working
intensely on various conservation projects to protect this species and
its habitat. Various NGCOs have been involved in the conservation of
this species since 1995 with authorization from the Bolivian Government
(Gilardi 2012, pers. comm.; LPF 2002, p. 10). NGCOs involved include
Asociaci[oacute]n Armon[iacute]a (Bolivia's BirdLife International
partner); the Loro Parque Fundaci[oacute]n (LPF), and WPT. A Species
Recovery Plan that provides the basis for the Blue-throated Macaw
Conservation Program was approved by Bolivia's Ministry for Sustainable
Development in 2004 and has been in place since then (LPF 2003, pp. 6-
7).
Within its breeding range, a multitude of efforts are in progress
to conserve the species (Gilardi 2012 personal communication; Berkunsky
2010, p. 5, Kyle 2007, pp. 1-11). Conservation measures include
constant monitoring, protection, and manipulation of nests,
supplementing nestlings' diet when food sources are scarce, agreements
with private landowners, patrolling existing macaw habitat by foot and
motorbike, and monitoring the Beni lowlands for additional populations
(LPF 2012; Kyle 2007a; Snyder et al. 2000). Nongovernmental
conservation organizations (NGCOs) have implemented cooperation
agreements with the federation of cattle farmers of the Beni (FEGABENI)
and the local authorities in Trinidad (LPF et al. 2003, p. 6).
Land acquisition to expand protected habitat for this species has
been funded by the World Land Trust. In 2008, Asociaci[oacute]n
Armon[iacute]a and LPF purchased a 3,555-ha (8,785-ac) reserve for the
purpose of establishing a protected area for the blue-throated macaw
(WorldLand Trust 2010, accessed July 16, 2010; BLI 2008). In 2010, the
Barba Azul Nature Reserve was expanded by 1,123 hectares (ha) (2,775
acres (ac)), creating a total protected area for the blue-throated
macaws of 4,664 ha (11,525 ac) (Asociaci[oacute]n Armon[iacute]a 2012).
Currently, this Reserve is the only protected area designated for the
blue-throated macaw. Legal protections that apply fall under Bolivian
Law 1333 (Ministerio de Desarrollo Sostenible y Planificacion 1999),
Article 111. This Reserve protects savanna habitat; and habitat
restoration is occurring in the Reserve, although it is unclear the
extent the Reserve is used by blue-throated macaws. The actual
protections in place include monitoring of habitat, local education and
awareness programs about the species, establishment of suitable nesting
sites. Approximately 70 blue-throated macaws have been observed in or
around this Reserve (Herrera 2012, pers. comm.); however, these macaws
may be some of the same macaws that are observed in other parts of its
range during the breeding season (Berkunsky 2012, pers. comm.).
Despite the existence of the reserve, there are no nests in the
Reserve that are occupied by the blue-throated macaws (Herrera 2012,
personal communication). Although blue-throated macaws do not use this
area for breeding, there is evidence that they use the Reserve for
feeding (Herrera 2012, personal communication; Kingsbury 2010, pp. 69-
82). It appears that blue-throated macaws use the Reserve and adjacent
ranches during the non-breeding season while their breeding-season
habitat is seasonally-flooded (see Appendix A for a map of its range;
Milpacher 2012, personal communication; Herrera 2012, personal
communication). Other than the Barba Azul Nature Reserve, there are no
protected areas in the Llanos de Mojos except the Beni Biosphere
Reserve, which has been in existence since 1986. However, to our
knowledge, the blue-throated macaw does not use the Beni Biosphere
Reserve (Hesse and Duffield 2000, p. 258).
In addition to conservation efforts, the NGCOs working in Bolivia
are conducting field research to better understand the current state of
this species. However, the conservation work is extremely difficult due
to the various factors that affect the species. Because the species'
habitat is flooded for 6 months of the year, monitoring its habitat is
impossible during certain seasons (Berkunsky 2010, p. 5). There have
also been discussions of reintroducing captive-raised birds into the
wild; however, this practice could inadvertently introduce disease into
the wild population if precautions are not taken to minimize the
transmission of disease to other blue-throated macaws.
Another conservation measure in place is research on the
motac[uacute] palm (Milpacher 2012, personal communication) because the
number of motac[uacute] palms is decreasing. This palm species plays a
significant role in the life cycle of the blue-throated macaw. One
study found that the old and senescent motac[uacute] palms
significantly exceed the younger palms (LPF 2003, p. 21). Based on
their findings, researchers concluded that the islands containing
motac[uacute] are not regenerating motac[uacute] palms sufficiently. It
is likely that the lack of regeneration is due to over-grazing by
cattle and excessive use of fire over centuries (Kyle 2006, p. 5). WPT
has recently attempted several small scale palm germination experiments
to assess reestablishing palm habitat (Milpacher 2012, pers. comm.).
The motac[uacute] palm has commercial value in addition to its
ecological role. Palm trees are used for a multitude of purposes such
as thatch for housing, fruit, and palm oil (de la Torre et al. 2011,
pp. 327-369; Zambrana et al. 2007, pp. 2771-2778). Motac[uacute] palm-
dominated islands may have persisted in part due to their various
ecological and commercial values, but they certainly persist in part
because the islands are raised areas within the lowlands areas that are
prone to flooding. With respect to the short-term, local researchers
believe that there will be adequate motac[uacute] fruits in the
[[Page 2247]]
region for a few more decades (LPF 2003, p. 21); however, research on
the motac[uacute] is vital to the conservation of the blue-throated
macaw.
Educational awareness programs are in place in addition to research
and monitoring. The Asociaci[oacute]n Armon[iacute]a is involved in an
awareness campaign to ensure that the protection and conservation of
these birds occurs at a local level (e.g., protection of macaws from
trappers and the sustainable management of key habitats such as palm
groves and forest islands, on their property) (Llampa 2007; BLI 2008a;
Snyder et al. 2000). Two educational awareness centers have been
established in the towns of Santa Ana del Yacuma and Santa Rosa del
Yacuma (LPF 2010, p. 16). In response to the limited but continued
poaching that occurs in the wild, LPF initiated a travelling
exhibition, ``Extinction is Forever,'' which visited 17 urban
localities in Bolivia in 2010 (LPF 2010, p. 15). The exhibition
includes 21 photographs that explain the ancestral and present day
relationship between people and birds, and highlights the effects of
illegal trade of wild birds in Bolivia currently. An estimated 1,000
visitors attended each showing in the main cities (LPF 2010, p. 15).
In summary, the conservation efforts underway are abundant, but
require significant effort. Reproductive success is vital to the blue-
throated macaw recovery and this species faces many challenges to
successfully reproducing. This species' nest often has an open crown
(i.e. no roof) and is prone to flooding (Berkunsky 2010, p. 4; Kyle
2007a, p. 3). During many seasons, nests, eggs, and nestlings are
destroyed due to flooding. Both WBT and Asociaci[oacute]n
Armon[iacute]a have been conducting conservation activities such as
installation of artificial nest boxes that provide safe habitat,
manipulating nests so that they do not flood, and discouraging
predators and nest competitors. The installation of a multitude and
variety of nest boxes is a way to boost breeding success. Because many
other species compete for these nest boxes, and blue-throated macaws
tend to re-use previously-used nesting sites, the process of
introducing nest boxes and encouraging blue-throated macaws to use them
while discouraging other species from using them is a very time-
intensive process. Despite all of these conservation efforts, fewer
than 150 individuals of this species are believed to remain in the
wild.
Other Factors
An additional factor that affects the nesting success of blue-
throated macaws is the availability of food sources--not only the
abundance of food, but the timing of its availability. Phenology (how
the timing of plant life cycle events interacts with animal biological
processes) is influenced by variations in climate. The timing of
motac[uacute] palm fruit production is critical for various life stages
of the blue-throated macaw, particularly during the period following
hatching. The motac[uacute] palms, on which blue-throated macaws depend
for nesting as well as feeding, are affected by drought, burning, and
excessive rainfall. In years when there is significant drought or
excessive rainfall, the fruiting abundance and timing of fruit
production can significantly affect the success of nestlings, or it can
prohibit blue-throated macaws from even attempting to nest (Kyle 2007).
In some seasons when food is not as plentiful, breeding pairs may
choose not to brood and the weakest of the nestlings are neglected by
its parents and die of starvation (Kyle 2007a, pp. 4-5). During these
times, in some cases, the diet is supplemented by these conservation
organizations; however, it is a very intensive process.
In summary, there are many factors that are causing stress to this
species' population. It is affected primarily by predation, nest
flooding, and lack of nest sites. Combined with its reduced population
size, the species lacks sufficient redundancy and resiliency to recover
from present and future threats without intervention and intense
conservation actions.
Finding (Proposed Listing Determination)
In assessing whether the blue-throated macaw meets the definition
of a threatened or endangered species, we considered the five factors
in section 4(a)(1) of the Act. A species is ``endangered'' for purposes
of the Act if it is in danger of extinction throughout all or a
significant portion of its range and is ``threatened'' if it is likely
to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range. In considering what factors might
constitute threats to a species, we must look beyond the mere exposure
of the species to the factor to evaluate whether the species may
respond to the factor in a way that causes actual impacts to the
species. If there is exposure to a factor and the species responds
negatively, the factor may be a threat and we attempt to determine how
significant a threat it is. The threat is significant if it drives, or
contributes to, the risk of extinction of the species such that the
species may warrant listing as endangered or threatened as those terms
are defined in the Act. We conducted a review of the status of this
species and assessed whether the blue-throated macaw is threatened or
endangered throughout all of its range. On the basis of the best
scientific and commercial information, we do not find that the factors
affecting the species are likely to be sufficiently ameliorated in the
foreseeable future.
A multitude of factors has contributed to the decline of this
species' population. In the past, factors that significantly reduced
the number of blue-throated macaws included habitat loss and
overutilization for the pet trade and museum specimens (NMNH 2012;
Berkunsky 2010, p. 4; Kyle 2005, pp. 6-10). Currently, the primary
factors that impact the blue-throated macaws are:
Lack of adequate nest sites (both in abundance and
effectiveness);
Failure to adequately reproduce: nest (clutch) failure
(when one or all of the nestlings fail to survive to fledgling stage
due to a variety of reasons such as starvation, inadequate nutrition,
sibling competition, or other reasons);
Nest flooding (if nests are not monitored and
manipulated);
Botflies;
Potential inbreeding which results in malformations and
reduced fertility and loss of genetic variability due to a small
population size (WCS in litt. 2011);
Competition for nests with more competitive species such
as bees and other avian species such as other macaw species; and
Predation by numerous species, particularly birds of prey
such as toucans, owls, vultures, other raptors, and even other macaw
species (Berkunsky 2010, p. 4; Kyle 2006, p. 4, Loro Parque
Fundaci[oacute]n 2003, p. 28).
All of these factors combined make the blue-throated macaw
exceptionally vulnerable to extinction. The historical, current, and
ongoing threats to the blue-throated macaw have reduced the population
such that it is extremely small, and the remaining pairs face many
challenges to successfully reproduce offspring. The blue-throated macaw
is currently at risk throughout all of its range due to historical
impacts of the cumulative habitat loss that resulted from manipulation
of its habitat over time, and the current practice of maintaining
cattle pastures do not adequately allow palm species to regenerate. In
addition, overutilization for the pet trade and museum specimens has
reduced the status of the species to the point that its population is
vulnerable to permanent extirpation from the wild. This species is more
vulnerable to the effects of disease and
[[Page 2248]]
predation than it would have been otherwise. The species is also
affected by stochastic events such as extreme weather events, which
cause nest flooding and knock down trees where it has formed nests; we
expect this to continue into the future.
Despite protections in place and educational awareness programs,
this species is still occasionally being removed from the wild. A
conservation plan was finalized in 2003 by several NGCOs and has been
in place for almost 10 years. Even though intensive efforts to recover
and conserve this species and its habitat by at least three NGCOs are
underway, the recovery plan has not met its goals: the population of
this species is still likely less than 150 in the wild. This species'
life-history traits (such as the long investment time to raise
nestlings, reproduction does not usually occur until age 6; and pairs
generally mating for life), make it particularly susceptible to
extinction. Additionally, its populations are small, its remaining
suitable habitat is small, the population may lack genetic diversity
which is causing malformations in nestlings, and the species is not
reproducing sufficiently. These threats are currently impacting blue-
throated macaw throughout its range and will likely continue in the
future.
This species experienced a sharp population decline in the past few
hundred years because it has been removed from the wild for various
purposes, and now it faces a multitude of factors that negatively
affect its ability to reproduce. Although removal of this species from
the wild was detrimental to this species in the past, we found that
international trade is no longer a factor currently influencing the
species' status in the wild; however, limited poaching continues to
occur. Illegal capture for the local pet trade is exacerbated by the
other factors acting on the species. The regulatory mechanisms in place
are inadequate to mitigate the factors that are negatively affecting
the species. The lack of success of the species to increase its
population indicates that the laws governing wildlife and habitat
protection in Bolivia are inadequate to protect the species or to
mitigate these threats.
In conclusion, we have carefully assessed the best scientific and
commercial information available regarding the past, present, and
future threats affecting this species. Historically, the blue-throated
macaw existed in much higher numbers in more continuous, connected
habitat. As described above, there are many obvious factors that
currently affect the blue-throated macaws. These include: inadequate
nest sites (both in abundance and effectiveness), nest (clutch) failure
(when one or all of the nestlings fail to survive to fledgling stage
due to a variety of reasons such as starvation, inadequate nutrition,
sibling competition), nest flooding, and botflies; competition for
nests with more competitive species such as bees and other avian
species such as large woodpeckers and other macaw species; and
predation by numerous species, particularly birds of prey such as
toucans, owls, vultures, other raptors, and even other macaw species.
Our review of the information pertaining to the five threat factors
supports a conclusion that the imminence, intensity, and magnitude of
the factors affecting the species occurs to an extent such that the
threats to the blue-throated macaw, coupled with an extremely small
population that has declined over the past few hundred years, place
this species at risk of extinction throughout all of its range, such
that a listing of endangered is warranted. The species is currently in
danger of extinction because the species is at such low levels that it
is vulnerable to stochastic environmental events, particularly
predation and nest flooding. Given the species' low reproductive
capacity and impaired genetic fitness, it is unable to increase to the
levels of abundance that is able to withstand such events. We find that
the blue-throated macaw is in danger of extinction now and, therefore,
is appropriately listed as an endangered species. Therefore, we propose
to list the blue-throated macaw as endangered under the Act.
Peer Review
In accordance with our joint policy with the National Marine
Fisheries Service, ``Notice of Interagency Cooperative Policy for Peer
Review in Endangered Species Act Activities,'' published in the Federal
Register on July 1, 1994 (59 FR 34270), we will seek the expert
opinions of at least three appropriate independent specialists
regarding this proposed rule. The purpose of peer review is to ensure
that our final determination is based on scientifically sound data,
assumptions, and analyses. We will send copies of this proposed rule to
the peer reviewers immediately following publication in the Federal
Register. We will invite these peer reviewers to comment during the
public comment period on our specific assumptions and conclusions
regarding the proposal to list the blue-throated macaw.
We will consider all comments and information we receive during the
comment period on this proposed rule during our preparation of a final
determination. Accordingly, our final decision may differ from this
proposal.
Available Conservation Measures
Conservation measures provided to species listed as endangered
under the Act include recognition, requirements for Federal protection,
and prohibitions against certain practices. Recognition through listing
results in public awareness, and encourages and results in conservation
actions by Federal and State governments, private agencies and interest
groups, and individuals.
The Act and its implementing regulations set forth a series of
general prohibitions and exceptions that apply to all endangered
wildlife. These prohibitions, at 50 CFR 17.21, in part, make it illegal
for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to
``take'' (includes harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill,
trap, capture, or to attempt any of these) within the United States or
upon the high seas; import or export; deliver, receive, carry,
transport, or ship in interstate commerce in the course of commercial
activity; or sell or offer for sale in interstate or foreign commerce
any endangered wildlife species. It also is illegal to possess, sell,
deliver, carry, transport, or ship any such wildlife that has been
taken in violation of the Act. Certain exceptions apply to agents of
the Service and State conservation agencies.
Permits may be issued to carry out otherwise prohibited activities
involving endangered wildlife species under certain circumstances.
Regulations governing permits for endangered species are codified at 50
CFR 17.22. With regard to endangered wildlife, a permit may be issued
for the following purposes: For scientific purposes, to enhance the
propagation or survival of the species, and for incidental take in
connection with otherwise lawful activities.
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
[[Page 2249]]
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the names of the sections or
paragraphs that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful,
etc.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
We have determined that environmental assessments and environmental
impact statements, as defined under the authority of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), need not be
prepared in connection with regulations adopted under section 4(a) of
the Act. We published a notice outlining our reasons for this
determination in the Federal Register on October 25, 1983 (48 FR
49244).
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited in this proposed rule is
available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or upon request
from the Branch of Foreign Species, Endangered Species Program, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service.
Author(s)
The primary author of this proposed rule is Amy Brisendine, Branch
of Foreign Species, Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species, Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
Accordingly, we propose to amend part 17, subchapter B of chapter
I, title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth below:
PART 17--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361-1407; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1544; 16 U.S.C.
4201-4245; Pub. L. 99-625, 100 Stat. 3500; unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.11(h) by adding a new entry for ``Macaw, blue-
throated'' in alphabetical order under BIRDS to the List of Endangered
and Threatened Wildlife to read as follows:
Sec. 17.11 Endangered and threatened wildlife.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species Vertebrate
-------------------------------------------------------- population where Critical Special
Historic range endangered or Status When listed habitat rules
Common name Scientific name threatened
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Birds
* * * * * * *
Macaw, blue-throated............. Ara glaucogularis... Bolivia............ Entire............. E ........... NA NA
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Dated: December 31, 2012.
Rowan W. Gould,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-00291 Filed 1-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P