Hearings of The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure, 1882 [2013-00233]
Download as PDF
1882
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 9, 2013 / Notices
Notice.
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determinations
(‘‘IDs’’) (Order Nos. 6, and 8) granting
(1) a motion by complainant Emerson
Electric Co. of St. Louis, Missouri
(‘‘Emerson’’) to partially terminate the
investigation and (2) a motion to
terminate the investigation based on
withdrawal of the complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda S. Pitcher, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2737. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on April 20, 2012, based on a complaint
filed by Emerson of St. Louis, Missouri,
alleging violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) by
reason of (1) Infringement of the claim
of U.S. Patent No. D535,850 (’850
patent); (2) infringement of U.S.
Trademark Registration No. 2,518,010
and common law trademarks; (3) unfair
competition by passing off; (4)
trademark dilution; and (5) trade dress
infringement. 77 FR 23751 (Apr. 20,
2012). The Commission’s Notice of
Investigation named Anaheim
Manufacturing Co. of Brea, California as
the only respondent. The Notice of
Investigation was amended to add
respondents Jiangsu Mega Motors and
Zhjiang Zhongda Technical Export Co.
Ltd. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also named
as a party.
On November 28, 2012, Emerson filed
a motion for partial termination with
respect to Emerson’s allegations of
infringement of the ’850 patent,
trademark infringement by inducement,
and trademark dilution. On December 3,
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jan 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
2012, Emerson filed a letter
supplementing its motion to state that
there are no agreements among the
parties concerning the subject matter of
the investigation. On December 4, 2012,
the ALJ granted Emerson’s motion, in
Order No. 6, finding that there are no
agreements, written or oral, express or
implied between the parties concerning
the investigation. In addition, the ALJ
found that there are no extraordinary
circumstances that would preclude
granting the motion and that partial
termination is in the public interest.
On December 7, 2012, Emerson filed
a motion to terminate the investigation
based on withdrawal of the remaining
allegations in the complaint and to stay
the procedural schedule. On December
11, 2012, the ALJ granted Emerson’s
motion, in Order No. 8, finding that
there are no agreements, written or oral,
express or implied between the parties
concerning the investigation. In
addition, the ALJ found that there are no
extraordinary circumstances that would
preclude granting the motion and that
termination of the investigation is in the
public interest.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject IDs and to
terminate the investigation.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 3, 2013.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–00178 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules
Officer and Counsel, Administrative
Office of the United States Courts,
Washington, DC. 20544, telephone (202)
502–1820.
Dated: January 2, 2013.
Notice of Meeting Cancellation.
Benjamin J. Robinson,
Rules Committee Deputy and Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013–00230 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Hearings of The Judicial Conference
Advisory Committee on Rules of
Appellate Procedure
Federal Register Citation of Previous
Announcement: 77FR 49828.
AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the
United States, Advisory Committee on
Rules of Appellate Procedure.
ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open
Hearing.
The following public hearing
on proposed amendments to the Federal
Rules of Appellate Procedure has been
canceled: Appellate Rules Hearing,
February 1, 2013, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules
Officer and Counsel, Administrative
Office of the United States Courts,
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202)
502–1820.
SUMMARY:
Dated: January 2, 2013.
Benjamin J. Robinson,
Rules Committee Deputy and Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013–00233 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Hearings of the Judicial Conference
Advisory Committee on Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure
Federal Register Citation of Previous
Announcements: 77 FR H9828.
AGENCY: Advisory Committee on Rules
of Bankruptcy Procedure, Judicial
Conference of the United States.
ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open
Hearing.
The following public hearing
on proposed amendments to the Federal
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been
canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing,
February 1, 2013, Washington, DC.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed First
Amendment to Consent Decree Under
the Clean Air Act
On January 2, 2013, the Department of
Justice lodged a proposed first
amendment to a consent decree with the
United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas in the lawsuit
entitled United States v. Formosa
Plastics Corporation, Texas, et al., Civil
Action No. 09–00061.
Under the original 2010 consent
decree, Formosa Plastics Corporation,
Texas, Formosa Hydrocarbons, Inc.
(collectively ‘‘FPC TX’’), and Formosa
Plastics Corporation, Louisiana
(collectively ‘‘Defendants’’) agreed to
undertake numerous measures to come
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00233]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES
Hearings of The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules
of Appellate Procedure
Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 77FR 49828.
AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on
Rules of Appellate Procedure.
ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open Hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure has been canceled: Appellate Rules
Hearing, February 1, 2013, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules
Officer and Counsel, Administrative Office of the United States Courts,
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.
Dated: January 2, 2013.
Benjamin J. Robinson,
Rules Committee Deputy and Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-00233 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P