Hearings of The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure, 1882 [2013-00233]

Download as PDF 1882 ACTION: Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 9, 2013 / Notices Notice. Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determinations (‘‘IDs’’) (Order Nos. 6, and 8) granting (1) a motion by complainant Emerson Electric Co. of St. Louis, Missouri (‘‘Emerson’’) to partially terminate the investigation and (2) a motion to terminate the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda S. Pitcher, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on April 20, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Emerson of St. Louis, Missouri, alleging violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) by reason of (1) Infringement of the claim of U.S. Patent No. D535,850 (’850 patent); (2) infringement of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,518,010 and common law trademarks; (3) unfair competition by passing off; (4) trademark dilution; and (5) trade dress infringement. 77 FR 23751 (Apr. 20, 2012). The Commission’s Notice of Investigation named Anaheim Manufacturing Co. of Brea, California as the only respondent. The Notice of Investigation was amended to add respondents Jiangsu Mega Motors and Zhjiang Zhongda Technical Export Co. Ltd. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also named as a party. On November 28, 2012, Emerson filed a motion for partial termination with respect to Emerson’s allegations of infringement of the ’850 patent, trademark infringement by inducement, and trademark dilution. On December 3, srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:39 Jan 08, 2013 Jkt 229001 2012, Emerson filed a letter supplementing its motion to state that there are no agreements among the parties concerning the subject matter of the investigation. On December 4, 2012, the ALJ granted Emerson’s motion, in Order No. 6, finding that there are no agreements, written or oral, express or implied between the parties concerning the investigation. In addition, the ALJ found that there are no extraordinary circumstances that would preclude granting the motion and that partial termination is in the public interest. On December 7, 2012, Emerson filed a motion to terminate the investigation based on withdrawal of the remaining allegations in the complaint and to stay the procedural schedule. On December 11, 2012, the ALJ granted Emerson’s motion, in Order No. 8, finding that there are no agreements, written or oral, express or implied between the parties concerning the investigation. In addition, the ALJ found that there are no extraordinary circumstances that would preclude granting the motion and that termination of the investigation is in the public interest. The Commission has determined not to review the subject IDs and to terminate the investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 3, 2013. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2013–00178 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules Officer and Counsel, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC. 20544, telephone (202) 502–1820. Dated: January 2, 2013. Notice of Meeting Cancellation. Benjamin J. Robinson, Rules Committee Deputy and Counsel. [FR Doc. 2013–00230 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 2210–55–P JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Hearings of The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 77FR 49828. AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure. ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open Hearing. The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure has been canceled: Appellate Rules Hearing, February 1, 2013, Washington, DC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules Officer and Counsel, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502–1820. SUMMARY: Dated: January 2, 2013. Benjamin J. Robinson, Rules Committee Deputy and Counsel. [FR Doc. 2013–00233 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 2210–55–P BILLING CODE 7020–02–P JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcements: 77 FR H9828. AGENCY: Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States. ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open Hearing. The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing, February 1, 2013, Washington, DC. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed First Amendment to Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act On January 2, 2013, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed first amendment to a consent decree with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, et al., Civil Action No. 09–00061. Under the original 2010 consent decree, Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, Formosa Hydrocarbons, Inc. (collectively ‘‘FPC TX’’), and Formosa Plastics Corporation, Louisiana (collectively ‘‘Defendants’’) agreed to undertake numerous measures to come E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM 09JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Hearings of The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules 
of Appellate Procedure

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 77FR 49828.

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Appellate Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open Hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the 
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure has been canceled: Appellate Rules 
Hearing, February 1, 2013, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules 
Officer and Counsel, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: January 2, 2013.
Benjamin J. Robinson,
Rules Committee Deputy and Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-00233 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P