Grapes Grown in Designated Area of Southeastern California; Increased Assessment Rate, 1715-1718 [2013-00190]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 9, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
coordinates 42°84′19″, -77°61′88″; then
east to coordinates 42°84′22″,
-77°61′61″; then north along a farm road
to coordinates 42°84′87.2″, 77°61′68.1″;
then east to the west side of Plank Road
marked by coordinates 42°84′87.2″,
77°61′35.9″; then north to point of
beginning at coordinates 42°84′89.0″,
-77°61′36.7″.
*
*
*
*
*
Steuben County. (A) The towns of
Prattsburg and Wheeler;
(B) The area known as ‘‘Arkport Muck
North’’ located in the town of Dansville
and bounded as follows: Beginning at a
point along the west bank of the Marsh
Ditch that intersects a farm road marked
by latitude/longitude coordinates
42°42′30″, -°71′21″; then north along the
Marsh Ditch to coordinates 42°42′96.1″,
-°71′54.0″; then west along a 45-foot
wide hedgerow to coordinates
42°42′83.1″, -°72′00.3″; then south
through woods, along a farm road, and
field border to coordinates 42°42′55″,
-°71′89″; then east along a tree line to
coordinates 42°42′54″, -°71′80″; then
south along a tree line to coordinates
42°42′30″, -°71′57″; then east to point of
beginning at coordinates 42°42′30″,
-°71′21″;
(C) The area known as ‘‘Arkport Muck
South″ located in the town of Dansville
and bounded as follows: Beginning at a
point along the west side of New York
Route 36 marked by latitude/longitude
coordinates 42°40′54.5″, -°69′79.0″; then
north along the west side of New York
Route 36 to coordinates 42°41′45″,
-°69′99″; then west along a farm road to
coordinates 42°41′45″, -°70′29″; then
north along a farm road to coordinates
42°41′60″, -°70′36″; then west along a
farm road to coordinates 42°41′62″,
-°70′83″; then north along the Marsh
Ditch to coordinates 42°41′86″, -°70′97″;
then west along a farm road to
coordinates 42°41′81″, 77°71′21″; then
south along a farm road to coordinates
42°41′76.0″, -°71′18.0″; then west along
a fallow strip to coordinates 42°41′75.6″,
-°71′40.2″; then south along a fallow
strip to coordinates 42°41′61.3″,
-°71′42.0″; then west along a farm road
to coordinates 42°41′60.4″, 77°71′68.1″;
then south along a farm road on the east
side of the Conrail right-of-way (Erie
Lackawanna Railroad) to coordinates
42°40′50″, -°71′07″; then east along a
farm road to coordinates 42°40′49″,
-°70′38″; then north along an irrigation
ditch to coordinates 42°40′69.9″,
-°70′46.8″; then east along an irrigation
ditch to coordinates 42°40′69.7″,
77°70′34.3″; then south along the Marsh
Ditch to coordinates 42°40′55.0″,
-°70′26.5″; then east to point of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Jan 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
beginning at coordinates 42°40′54.5″,
-°69′79.0″;
(D) The property in the town of
Cohocton (formerly known as the
‘‘Werthwhile Farm″) bounded as
follows: Beginning at a point along the
north side of Brown Hill Road marked
by latitude/longitude coordinates
42°45′03.5″, -°53′56.2″; then north along
a forest edge to coordinates 42°45′27.5″,
-°53′55.7″; then west along a forest edge
to coordinates 42°45′27″, -°53′72.9″;
then north along a forest edge to
coordinates 42°45′47.6″, -°53′72.2″; then
west along a forest edge and a hedgerow
to the east side of Rex Road to
coordinates 42°45′48.7″, -°54′40.7″; then
southwest along the east side of Rex
Road to coordinates 42°45′39.4″,
-°54′53.6″; then south along a hedgerow
and a forest edge to coordinates
42°45′05.7″, -°54′54.7″; then east along a
hedgerow and the north side of Brown
Hill Road to point of beginning at
coordinates 42°45′03.5″, 77°53′56.2″;
and
(E) The property located in the town
of Fremont that is bounded as follows:
Beginning at a point on Babcock Road
that intersects a farm road marked by
latitude/longitude coordinates
42°43′68.06″, -°57′51.11″; then west
along the farm road to coordinates
42°43′67.22″, -°57′80.56″; then south to
coordinates 42°43′60.00″, 77°57′80.28″;
then west to coordinates 42°43′59.44″,
-°58′07.50″; then south to coordinates
42°43′35.28″, -°58′06.39″; then east to
coordinates 42°43′33.06″, 77°57′78.89″;
then south to coordinates 42°43′18.61″,
-°57′77.78″; then east to coordinates
42°43′23.06″, -°57′71.39″; then north to
coordinates 42°43′30.28″, 77°57′63.89″;
then east to coordinates 42°43′30.28″,
-°57′61.39″; then north to coordinates
42°43′49.44″, -°57′56.94″; then east to
coordinates 42°43′49.17″, 77°57′49.72″;
then north to the point of beginning at
coordinates 42°43′68.06″, 77°57′51.11″.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
January 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–00206 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1715
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 925
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–11–0090; FV 12–925–1
FR]
Grapes Grown in Designated Area of
Southeastern California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule increases the
assessment rate established for the
California Desert Grape Administrative
Committee (Committee) for the 2012
and subsequent fiscal periods from
$0.0125 to $0.0150 per 18-pound lug of
grapes handled. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order, which
regulates the handling of grapes grown
in a designated area of southeastern
California. Assessments upon grape
handlers are used by the Committee to
fund reasonable and necessary expenses
of the program. The fiscal period began
January 1 and ends December 31. The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified, suspended
or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: January 10, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathie M. Notoro, Marketing Specialist,
or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence SW.,
STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–
0237; Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax:
(202) 720–8938, or Email:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
925, as amended (7 CFR part 925),
regulating the handling of grapes grown
in a designated area of southeastern
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
1716
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 9, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, grape handlers in a designated
area of southeastern California are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein is
applicable to all assessable grapes
beginning on January 1, 2012, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2012 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $0.0125 to $0.0150 per 18-pound
lug of grapes.
The grape order provides authority for
the Committee, with the approval of
USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are
producers and handlers of grapes grown
in a designated area of southeastern
California. They are familiar with the
Committee’s needs and with the costs
for goods and services in their local area
and are thus in a position to formulate
an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated
and discussed in a public meeting.
Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2011 and subsequent fiscal
periods, the Committee recommended,
and the USDA approved, an assessment
rate that would continue in effect from
fiscal period to fiscal period unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the
Committee or other information
available to USDA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Jan 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
The Committee met on November 3,
2011, and unanimously recommended
2012 expenditures of $95,500 and an
assessment rate of $0.0150 per 18-pound
lug of grapes handled. In comparison,
last year’s budgeted expenditures were
$89,616. The assessment rate of $0.0150
per 18-pound lug of grapes handled
recommended by the Committee is
$0.0025 higher than the $0.0125 rate
currently in effect. The higher
assessment rate is necessary to cover the
Committee’s budgeted expenses which
include an increase in research and
general office expenses. While the
Committee’s crop estimate of 5.8
million, 18-pound lugs is higher than
the 5.4 million, 18-pound lugs handled
last year, the higher assessment will
generate $87,000 of revenue. This
revenue plus the operating reserve
should be sufficient to cover the
increase in anticipated expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2012 fiscal period include $15,500 for
research, $17,500 for general office
expenses, and $62,500 for management
and compliance expenses. The $15,500
research project is a for a new vine
study proposed by the University of
California Riverside. In comparison,
major expenditures for the 2011 fiscal
period included $10,000 for research,
$15,616 for general office expenses, and
$64,000 management and compliance
expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by the
following formula: Anticipated 2012
expenses ($95,500) plus the desired
2012 ending reserve ($70,000), minus
the anticipated 2012 beginning reserve
($78,500), divided by the estimated
2012 shipments (5.8 million, 18-pound
lugs) equals $0.0150 per lug.
Income generated through the $0.0150
assessment ($87,000) plus anticipated
carry-in reserve funds ($78,500) should
be sufficient to meet anticipated
expenses ($95,500). Reserve funds by
the end of 2012 are projected at $70,000
or about one fiscal period’s expenses.
Section 925.41 of the order permits the
Committee to maintain about one fiscal
period’s expenses in reserve.
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate the Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking will be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2012 budget and those for
subsequent fiscal periods will be
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 13 handlers
of southeastern California grapes who
are subject to regulation under the order
and about 41 grape producers in the
production area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $7,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $750,000. Nine of the 13 handlers
subject to regulation have annual grape
sales of less than $7 million. Based on
data from the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) and the
Committee, the crop value for the 2011
season was about $46,574,000. Dividing
this figure by the number of producers
(41) yields an average annual producer
revenue estimate of about $1,135,951.
However, according to the Committee,
at least 10 of 41 producers would be
considered small businesses under the
Small Business Administration
threshold of $750,000. Based on the
foregoing, it may be concluded that a
majority of grape handlers and at least
ten of the producers could be classified
as small entities.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 9, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
collected from handlers for the 2012 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0125
to $0.0150 per 18-pound lug of grapes.
The Committee unanimously
recommended 2012 expenditures of
$95,500 and an assessment rate of
$0.0150 per 18-pound lug of grapes
handled. The assessment rate of $0.0150
is $0.0025 higher than the 2011 rate
currently in effect. The higher
assessment rate is necessary to cover the
Committee’s budgeted expenses,
including increases in research and
general office expenses. While the
Committee’s crop estimate of 5.8
million, 18-pound lugs is higher than
the 5.4 million, 18-pound lugs handled
last year, the higher rate will generate
$87,000 of revenue. This revenue plus
the operating reserve should be
sufficient to cover the increase in
anticipated expenses. Reserve funds by
the end of 2012 are projected at $70,000
or about one fiscal period’s expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2012 fiscal period include $15,500 for
research, $17,500 for general office
expenses, and $62,500 for management
and compliance expenses. The $15,500
research project is a for a new vine
study proposed by the University of
California Riverside. In comparison,
major expenditures for the 2011 fiscal
period included $10,000 for research,
$15,616 for general office expenses, and
$64,000 management and compliance
expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by the
following formula: Anticipated 2012
expenses ($95,500) plus the desired
2012 ending reserve ($70,000), minus
the anticipated 2012 beginning reserve
($78,500), divided by the estimated
2012 shipments (5.8 million, 18-pound
lugs) equals $0.0150 per lug.
The Committee reviewed and
unanimously recommended 2012
expenditures of $95,500, which
included increases in research and
general office expenses. Prior to arriving
at this budget, the Committee
considered alternative expenditures and
assessment rates, to include not
increasing the $0.0125 assessment rate
currently in effect. Based on a crop
estimate of 5.8 million 18-pound lugs,
the Committee ultimately determined
that increasing the assessment rate to
$0.0150 combined with funds generated
from the reserve should adequately
cover increased expenses and provide
an adequate 2012 ending reserve.
A review of historical crop and price
information, as well as preliminary
information pertaining to the upcoming
fiscal period indicates that the producer
price for the 2012 season could average
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Jan 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
about $7.93 per 18-pound lug of grapes
handled for California grapes. To
calculate the percentage of producer
revenue represented by the assessment
rate for 2011, the assessment rate of
$0.0125 per 18-pound lug is divided by
the estimated average producer price of
$7.93 per 18-pound lug. NASS data for
2012 is not yet available. However,
applying these same calculations above
using the July 2011 producer price
would result in an estimated assessment
revenue as a percentage of total
producer revenue of 0.189 percent for
the 2012 season ($0.0150 divided by
$7.93 per 18-pound lug). Thus, the
assessment revenue should be well
below the 1 percent of estimated
producer revenue in 2012.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to producers. However, these costs will
be offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the order. In addition, the
Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the grape
production area and all interested
persons were invited to attend and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the November 3, 2011,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189. No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California grape
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1717
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on July 2, 2012 (77 FR 39184).
Copies of the proposed rule were also
mailed or sent via facsimile to all grape
handlers. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 30-day comment period
ending August 1, 2012, was provided for
interested persons to respond to the
proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at
the previously-mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found
and determined that good cause exists
for not postponing the effective date of
this rule until 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register because: (1) The
2012 fiscal period began on January 1,
2012, and the marketing order requires
that the rate of assessment for each
fiscal period apply to all assessable
grapes handled during the fiscal period;
(2) the Committee needs to have
sufficient funds to meet its expenses,
which are incurred on a continuous
basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this
action, which was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued. Also, a
30-day comment period was provided
for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 925 is amended as
follows:
PART 925—GRAPES GROWN IN A
DESIGNATED AREA OF
SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 925 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
1718
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 9, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
2. Section 925.215 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 925.215
Assessment rate.
On or after January 1, 2012, an
assessment rate of $0.0150 per 18-pound
lug is established for grapes grown in a
designated area of southeastern
California.
Dated: January 3, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–00190 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0087 or
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
C. William Hench, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Eradication and
Surveillance Team, National Center for
Animal Health Programs, VS, APHIS,
2150 Centre Avenue, Building B–3E20,
Fort Collins, CO 80526–8117; (970) 494–
7378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
9 CFR Part 77
[Docket No. APHIS–2012–0087]
Approved Tests for Bovine
Tuberculosis in Cervids
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adding the CervidTB
Stat-Pak® and DPP® tests as official
tuberculosis tests for the following
species of captive cervids: Elk, red deer,
white-tailed deer, fallow deer, and
reindeer. We are taking this action
because we have determined that the
tests can reliably detect the presence or
absence of antibodies to bovine
tuberculosis in certain species of captive
cervids. This action is necessary on an
immediate basis in order to provide
regulated entities with more options in
order to meet the testing requirements
for captive cervids within the
regulations.
SUMMARY:
This interim rule is effective
January 9, 2013. We will consider all
comments that we receive on or before
March 11, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to:
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2012-00870001.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2012–0087, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Jan 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
Bovine tuberculosis is a contagious
and infectious granulomatous disease
caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium
bovis. Although commonly defined as a
chronic debilitating disease, bovine
tuberculosis can occasionally assume an
acute, rapidly progressive course. While
any body tissue can be affected, lesions
are most frequently observed in the
lymph nodes, lungs, intestines, liver,
spleen, pleura, and peritoneum.
Although cattle are considered to be the
true hosts of M. bovis, the disease has
been reported in several other species of
livestock, most notably bison and
captive cervids. There have also been
instances of infection in other domestic
and nondomestic animals, as well as in
humans.
Through the National Cooperative
State/Federal Bovine Tuberculosis
Eradication Program, the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
of the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) works cooperatively
with the Nation’s livestock industry and
State animal health agencies to eradicate
bovine tuberculosis from domestic
livestock in the United States and
prevent its recurrence.
Federal regulations implementing this
program are contained in 9 CFR part 77,
‘‘Tuberculosis’’ (referred to below as the
regulations) and in the ‘‘Uniform
Methods and Rules—Bovine
Tuberculosis Eradication,’’ which is
incorporated by reference within the
regulations. The regulations restrict the
interstate movement of cattle, bison, and
captive cervids to prevent the spread of
bovine tuberculosis. Subpart C of the
regulations (§§ 77.20 to 77.41, referred
to below as the captive cervid
regulations) addresses captive cervids.
Currently, in the captive cervid
regulations, there are several instances
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in which we require captive cervids to
be tested with an official tuberculosis
test. For example, in § 77.35, in order for
a herd of captive cervids to be
recognized as accredited, all cervids in
the herd must have tested negative to at
least two consecutive official
tuberculosis tests, conducted at 9 to 15
month intervals, with certain, limited
exceptions.
In § 77.20 of the captive cervid
regulations, the definition of official
tuberculosis test has provided that the
single cervical tuberculin (SCT) test, a
primary test, and comparative cervical
tuberculin (CCT) test, a supplemental
test, are recognized by APHIS as official
tuberculosis tests, provided that they are
applied and reported in accordance
with the captive cervid regulations.
In the same section, the definitions of
single cervical tuberculin (SCT) test and
comparative cervical tuberculin (CCT)
test provide how to apply each test; the
sequence in which the tests should be
administered and the manner in which
test results should be interpreted are
specified in § 77.34. The individuals
who may administer each test and the
reporting requirements for each test are
found in § 77.33.
We recently received a request to
evaluate the CervidTB Stat-Pak® test, a
primary test, and Dual Path Platform
(DPP)® test, a supplemental test, as
official tests for bovine tuberculosis in
the following species of captive cervids:
Elk, red deer, white-tailed deer, fallow
deer, and reindeer. Based on our
evaluation, we have determined that the
tests can reliably detect the presence or
absence of antibodies to bovine
tuberculosis in these species of captive
cervids. Accordingly, we are amending
the captive cervid regulations to
recognize these two tests as official
tuberculosis tests. We discuss these
amendments immediately below, by
section.
Definitions (§ 77.20)
As we mentioned previously, prior to
issuance of this interim rule, the
definition of official tuberculosis test in
§ 77.20 of the captive cervid regulations
specified that only the SCT and CCT
tests are official tuberculosis tests. We
are amending the definition of official
tuberculosis test so that it specifies that
the CervidTB Stat-Pak® and DPP® tests
are also official tuberculosis tests.
We are also adding definitions of
CervidTB Stat-Pak® test and Dual Path
Platform (DPP®) test to § 77.20. We are
defining CervidTB Stat-Pak® test as: ‘‘A
serological assay to determine the
presence of antibodies to bovine
tuberculosis (M. bovis) in elk, red deer,
white-tailed deer, fallow deer, and
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1715-1718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00190]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 925
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-11-0090; FV 12-925-1 FR]
Grapes Grown in Designated Area of Southeastern California;
Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
California Desert Grape Administrative Committee (Committee) for the
2012 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0125 to $0.0150 per 18-pound
lug of grapes handled. The Committee locally administers the marketing
order, which regulates the handling of grapes grown in a designated
area of southeastern California. Assessments upon grape handlers are
used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the
program. The fiscal period began January 1 and ends December 31. The
assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: January 10, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathie M. Notoro, Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Director, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906, or Email: Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 925, as amended (7 CFR part 925), regulating the handling of grapes
grown in a designated area of southeastern California, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
[[Page 1716]]
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, grape handlers
in a designated area of southeastern California are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate as issued herein
is applicable to all assessable grapes beginning on January 1, 2012,
and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2012 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0125 to
$0.0150 per 18-pound lug of grapes.
The grape order provides authority for the Committee, with the
approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the
Committee are producers and handlers of grapes grown in a designated
area of southeastern California. They are familiar with the Committee's
needs and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and
are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and
assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a
public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity
to participate and provide input.
For the 2011 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved, an assessment rate that would
continue in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on November 3, 2011, and unanimously recommended
2012 expenditures of $95,500 and an assessment rate of $0.0150 per 18-
pound lug of grapes handled. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures were $89,616. The assessment rate of $0.0150 per 18-pound
lug of grapes handled recommended by the Committee is $0.0025 higher
than the $0.0125 rate currently in effect. The higher assessment rate
is necessary to cover the Committee's budgeted expenses which include
an increase in research and general office expenses. While the
Committee's crop estimate of 5.8 million, 18-pound lugs is higher than
the 5.4 million, 18-pound lugs handled last year, the higher assessment
will generate $87,000 of revenue. This revenue plus the operating
reserve should be sufficient to cover the increase in anticipated
expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2012
fiscal period include $15,500 for research, $17,500 for general office
expenses, and $62,500 for management and compliance expenses. The
$15,500 research project is a for a new vine study proposed by the
University of California Riverside. In comparison, major expenditures
for the 2011 fiscal period included $10,000 for research, $15,616 for
general office expenses, and $64,000 management and compliance
expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by the
following formula: Anticipated 2012 expenses ($95,500) plus the desired
2012 ending reserve ($70,000), minus the anticipated 2012 beginning
reserve ($78,500), divided by the estimated 2012 shipments (5.8
million, 18-pound lugs) equals $0.0150 per lug.
Income generated through the $0.0150 assessment ($87,000) plus
anticipated carry-in reserve funds ($78,500) should be sufficient to
meet anticipated expenses ($95,500). Reserve funds by the end of 2012
are projected at $70,000 or about one fiscal period's expenses. Section
925.41 of the order permits the Committee to maintain about one fiscal
period's expenses in reserve.
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate the Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2012 budget and those for
subsequent fiscal periods will be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 13 handlers of southeastern California
grapes who are subject to regulation under the order and about 41 grape
producers in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those
having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$750,000. Nine of the 13 handlers subject to regulation have annual
grape sales of less than $7 million. Based on data from the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) and the Committee, the crop
value for the 2011 season was about $46,574,000. Dividing this figure
by the number of producers (41) yields an average annual producer
revenue estimate of about $1,135,951. However, according to the
Committee, at least 10 of 41 producers would be considered small
businesses under the Small Business Administration threshold of
$750,000. Based on the foregoing, it may be concluded that a majority
of grape handlers and at least ten of the producers could be classified
as small entities.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee and
[[Page 1717]]
collected from handlers for the 2012 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$0.0125 to $0.0150 per 18-pound lug of grapes. The Committee
unanimously recommended 2012 expenditures of $95,500 and an assessment
rate of $0.0150 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled. The assessment rate
of $0.0150 is $0.0025 higher than the 2011 rate currently in effect.
The higher assessment rate is necessary to cover the Committee's
budgeted expenses, including increases in research and general office
expenses. While the Committee's crop estimate of 5.8 million, 18-pound
lugs is higher than the 5.4 million, 18-pound lugs handled last year,
the higher rate will generate $87,000 of revenue. This revenue plus the
operating reserve should be sufficient to cover the increase in
anticipated expenses. Reserve funds by the end of 2012 are projected at
$70,000 or about one fiscal period's expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2012
fiscal period include $15,500 for research, $17,500 for general office
expenses, and $62,500 for management and compliance expenses. The
$15,500 research project is a for a new vine study proposed by the
University of California Riverside. In comparison, major expenditures
for the 2011 fiscal period included $10,000 for research, $15,616 for
general office expenses, and $64,000 management and compliance
expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by the
following formula: Anticipated 2012 expenses ($95,500) plus the desired
2012 ending reserve ($70,000), minus the anticipated 2012 beginning
reserve ($78,500), divided by the estimated 2012 shipments (5.8
million, 18-pound lugs) equals $0.0150 per lug.
The Committee reviewed and unanimously recommended 2012
expenditures of $95,500, which included increases in research and
general office expenses. Prior to arriving at this budget, the
Committee considered alternative expenditures and assessment rates, to
include not increasing the $0.0125 assessment rate currently in effect.
Based on a crop estimate of 5.8 million 18-pound lugs, the Committee
ultimately determined that increasing the assessment rate to $0.0150
combined with funds generated from the reserve should adequately cover
increased expenses and provide an adequate 2012 ending reserve.
A review of historical crop and price information, as well as
preliminary information pertaining to the upcoming fiscal period
indicates that the producer price for the 2012 season could average
about $7.93 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled for California grapes.
To calculate the percentage of producer revenue represented by the
assessment rate for 2011, the assessment rate of $0.0125 per 18-pound
lug is divided by the estimated average producer price of $7.93 per 18-
pound lug. NASS data for 2012 is not yet available. However, applying
these same calculations above using the July 2011 producer price would
result in an estimated assessment revenue as a percentage of total
producer revenue of 0.189 percent for the 2012 season ($0.0150 divided
by $7.93 per 18-pound lug). Thus, the assessment revenue should be well
below the 1 percent of estimated producer revenue in 2012.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
will be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the order.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the grape production area and all interested persons were invited to
attend and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like
all Committee meetings, the November 3, 2011, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express
views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0189. No changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become
necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California grape handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on July 2, 2012 (77 FR 39184).
Copies of the proposed rule were also mailed or sent via facsimile
to all grape handlers. Finally, the proposal was made available through
the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day
comment period ending August 1, 2012, was provided for interested
persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about
the compliance guide should be sent to Laurel May at the previously-
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The 2012
fiscal period began on January 1, 2012, and the marketing order
requires that the rate of assessment for each fiscal period apply to
all assessable grapes handled during the fiscal period; (2) the
Committee needs to have sufficient funds to meet its expenses, which
are incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this
action, which was unanimously recommended by the Committee at a public
meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued. Also, a
30-day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 925 is
amended as follows:
PART 925--GRAPES GROWN IN A DESIGNATED AREA OF SOUTHEASTERN
CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 925 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
[[Page 1718]]
0
2. Section 925.215 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 925.215 Assessment rate.
On or after January 1, 2012, an assessment rate of $0.0150 per 18-
pound lug is established for grapes grown in a designated area of
southeastern California.
Dated: January 3, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-00190 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P