Agency Information Collection Activities: Existing Collection; Comments Requested: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection; Annual Survey of Jails, 959-961 [2013-00040]

Download as PDF wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2013 / Notices In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the requested remedial orders are used in the United States; (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the requested remedial orders; (iii) Identify like or directly competitive articles that complainant, its licensees, or third parties make in the United States which could replace the subject articles if they were to be excluded; (iv) Indicate whether complainant, complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to the requested exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time; and (v) Explain how the requested remedial orders would impact United States consumers. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of business, eight calendar days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8 true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2929’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https:// www.usitc.gov/secretary/ fed_reg_notices/rules/ handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202–205– 2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:16 Jan 04, 2013 Jkt 229001 public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 2, 2013. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2013–00036 Filed 1–4–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–365–366 and 731–TA–734–735 (Third Review)] Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on certain pasta from Italy and Turkey would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATED: : Effective Date: December 10, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russell Duncan (220–708–2427), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 959 Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 10, 2012, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (77 FR 53909, September 4, 2012) was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response with respect to Turkey was adequate, and decided to conduct full reviews of the countervailing duty order and antidumping duty order on imports of certain pasta from Turkey. The Commission found that the respondent interested party group response with respect to Italy was inadequate. Notwithstanding the Commission’s adequacy determination regarding Italy, the Commission determined to conduct full reviews of the countervailing duty order and antidumping duty order on imports of certain pasta from Italy to promote administrative efficiency in light of its decision to conduct full reviews with respect to Turkey. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and on the Commission’s Web site. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 2, 2013. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2013–00048 Filed 1–4–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1121–0094] Agency Information Collection Activities: Existing Collection; Comments Requested: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection; Annual Survey of Jails ACTION: 60-day notice. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be submitting the following information E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM 07JAN1 960 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2013 / Notices wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for sixty days until March 8, 2013. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Todd D. Minton, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street NW., Washington, DC 20531 (phone: 202–305–9630). Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Revisions of a currently approved collection. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ). The collection includes the forms: Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ), which includes the regular form and the certainty jurisdiction form; and the Survey of Jails in Indian Country (SJIC) regular form. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form numbers include: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:16 Jan 04, 2013 Jkt 229001 • Annual Survey of Jails: This collection consists of four forms: Æ CJ–5 and CJ–5A, the ASJ regular forms: These forms go to jail jurisdictions in the ASJ sample that are not selected with certainty. The CJ–5 form goes to jail jurisdictions operated by the county or city and the CJ–5A goes to privately owned or operated confinement facilities; Æ CJ–5D and CJ–5DA, the ASJ certainty jurisdiction forms: The forms go to jail jurisdictions in the ASJ sample that are selected with certainty. The CJ– 5D and CJ–5DA request additional information about the distribution of time served, staffing, and inmate misconduct that are not requested on the CJ–5 and CJ–5A. The CJ–5D goes to jurisdictions operated by the county or city; the CJ–5DA goes to confinement facilities administered by two or more governments and privately owned or operated confinement facilities. • Survey of Jails in Indian Country (SJIC): All respondents receive the CJ– 5B (the SJIC regular form). The applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection is the Bureau of Justice Statistics, which is within the Office of Justice Programs. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: The affected public that will be asked to respond include approximately 1,000 county, city, and Tribal jail authorities (929 respondents to the ASJ and 82 to the SJIC). As community institutions that book an estimated 12 million inmates per year, local jails are an integral part of the justice system, operating at the front end (that is, following arrest or referral) as well as the back end (discharging inmates and holding those sentenced to jail). Their broad functions include handling inmates who are awaiting trial or sentencing, holding inmates for other authorities, detaining inmates with special needs such as mental health holds or alcohol detoxifications, transferring inmates to court appearances and bringing them back to detention, discharging inmates at the behest of the court or other entities, and holding inmates who have been sentenced to terms in jail. The set of collections in this package provides BJS with the capacity to track and analyze changes in the jail inmate population that might signal changes in the kinds of cases coming into or leaving the criminal justice system, and to analyze how the volatility of jail inmate populations affects the workload of jails and their capacities to provide services. The parallel structure of the SJIC PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 collection provides BJS with this capacity for Indian country jails. In its entirety, this collection is the only national effort devoted to describing and understanding annual changes in jail populations as well as assessing programs and capacities to provide services. The collection enables BJS, other federal agencies, and state, local, and Tribal corrections authorities and administrators, as well as legislators, researchers, and jail planners to track growth in the number of jails and their capacities nationally; as well as, track changes in the demographics and supervision status of jail population and the prevalence of crowding. The forms and information content for this collection are outlined next in the following order: First, the components of the Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ), which include the CJ–5, CJ–5A, CJ–5D, and CJ–5DA. Second, the Survey of Jails in Indian Country (SJIC) includes the CJ–5B. The two components of the Annual Survey of Jails include the CJ–5/5A and CJ–5D/5DA forms. The CJ–5/5A forms are to be administered to ASJ sample elements that are selected with a probability of less than 1. The CJ–5D/ 5DA forms are to be administered to ASJ sample elements selected with certainty. CJ–5 and CJ–5A For these forms, 555 respondents from sampled county and city jails will be asked to provide information for the following categories: (a) At midyear (last weekday in the month of June), the number of inmates confined in jail facilities including; male and female adult and juvenile inmates; persons under age 18 held as adults; race categories; held for Federal authorities, State prison authorities and other local jail jurisdictions. (b) At midyear, the number of convicted inmates that are unsentenced or sentenced and the number of unconvicted inmates awaiting trial/ arraignment, or transfers/holds for other authorities. (c) At midyear, the number of persons under jail supervision who were not U.S. citizens. (d) Whether the jail facilities has a weekend incarceration program prior to midyear and the number of inmates participating. (e) The number of new admissions into and final discharges from jail facilities during the last week in June. (f) The date and count for the greatest number of confined inmates during the 30-day period in June. (g) The average daily population of jail facilities from July 1 of the previous E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM 07JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2013 / Notices year to June 30 of the current collection year. (h) Jail capacity, measured three ways: rated capacity, operating capacity, and design capacity. (i) At midyear, the number of persons under jail supervision but not confined (e.g., electronic monitoring, day reporting, etc.). wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with CJ–5D and CJ–5DA These forms will be administered to the certainty jurisdictions in the ASJ sample; in addition to the information collected in the regular ASJ forms (the CJ–5/5A), the 374 respondents that are included with certainty in the ASJ sample survey will be asked to provide additional information on the flow of inmates going through jails and the distribution of time served, staff characteristics and assaults on staff resulting in death, and inmate misconduct. More specifically, these include: (a) The distribution of time served by inmates discharged during the final week of June, broken out by whether the inmates were convicted or unconvicted. (b) At midyear, the number of correctional officers and other staff employed by jail facilities; (c) From July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the current collection year: the number of inmate-inflicted physical assaults (and counts) on correctional officers and other staff and the number of staff deaths as a result. (d) From July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the current collection year: the number of inmates, by category, who were written up or found guilty of a rule violation. CJ–5B The Survey of Jails in Indian Country is collected from Indian country correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) (currently there are 82) will be asked to provide information for the following categories: (a) At midyear (last weekday in the month of June), the number of inmates confined in jail facilities including; male and female adult and juvenile inmates; persons under age 18 held as adults; convicted and unconvicted males and females; persons held for a felony, misdemeanor; their most serious offense (e.g., domestic violence offense, aggravated or simple assault, burglary, public intoxication, driving while intoxicated, etc.) (b) The average daily population during the 30-day period in June; (c) The date and count for the greatest number of confined inmates during the 30-day period in June; VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:16 Jan 04, 2013 Jkt 229001 (d) The number of new admissions into and final discharges during the month of June; (e) From July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the current collection year: the number of inmate deaths while confined and the number of deaths attributed to suicide and the number of confined inmates that attempted suicide; (f) At midyear, the total rated capacity of jail facilities; (g) At midyear, the number correctional staff employed by the facility and their occupation (e.g., administration, jail operations, educational staff, etc.); (h) At midyear, how many jail operations employees had received the basic detention officer certification and how many had received 40 hours of inservice training; (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: Six hundred and thirty-seven respondents each taking an average 75 minutes to respond for collection forms CJ–5 and CJ–5A, and CJ–5B. Three hundred and seventy-four respondents each taking 120 minutes to respond for collection forms CJ–5D and CJ–5DA. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are an estimated 1,544 total burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 1407B, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: January 2, 2013. Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2013–00040 Filed 1–4–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1103–NEW] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed New Collection; Comments Requested: Enhancing Community Policing Through Community Mediation Surveys ACTION: 60-Day notice. The Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) will be submitting the following information collection request PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 961 to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The revision of a previously approved information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days for public comment until March 8, 2013. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments, especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Danielle Ouellette, Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 145 N Street NE., Washington, DC 20530. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Proposed new collection; comments requested. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Enhancing Community Policing Through Community Mediation Surveys. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: None. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM 07JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 959-961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00040]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[OMB Number 1121-0094]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Existing Collection; 
Comments Requested: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection; 
Annual Survey of Jails

ACTION: 60-day notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Justice Statistics, will 
be submitting the following information

[[Page 960]]

collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged 
and will be accepted for sixty days until March 8, 2013. This process 
is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
    If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or 
associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed 
information collection instrument with instructions or additional 
information, please contact Todd D. Minton, Bureau of Justice 
Statistics, 810 Seventh Street NW., Washington, DC 20531 (phone: 202-
305-9630).
    Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected 
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are 
encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following 
four points:

--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the Bureau of Justice 
Statistics, including whether the information will have practical 
utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
--Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information to be collected can be enhanced; and
--Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those 
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses.

Overview of This Information Collection

    (1) Type of Information Collection: Revisions of a currently 
approved collection.
    (2) Title of the Form/Collection: The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ). 
The collection includes the forms: Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ), which 
includes the regular form and the certainty jurisdiction form; and the 
Survey of Jails in Indian Country (SJIC) regular form.
    (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the 
Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form numbers include:
     Annual Survey of Jails: This collection consists of four 
forms:
    [cir] CJ-5 and CJ-5A, the ASJ regular forms: These forms go to jail 
jurisdictions in the ASJ sample that are not selected with certainty. 
The CJ-5 form goes to jail jurisdictions operated by the county or city 
and the CJ-5A goes to privately owned or operated confinement 
facilities;
    [cir] CJ-5D and CJ-5DA, the ASJ certainty jurisdiction forms: The 
forms go to jail jurisdictions in the ASJ sample that are selected with 
certainty. The CJ-5D and CJ-5DA request additional information about 
the distribution of time served, staffing, and inmate misconduct that 
are not requested on the CJ-5 and CJ-5A. The CJ-5D goes to 
jurisdictions operated by the county or city; the CJ-5DA goes to 
confinement facilities administered by two or more governments and 
privately owned or operated confinement facilities.
     Survey of Jails in Indian Country (SJIC): All respondents 
receive the CJ-5B (the SJIC regular form).
    The applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring 
the collection is the Bureau of Justice Statistics, which is within the 
Office of Justice Programs.
    (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as 
well as a brief abstract: The affected public that will be asked to 
respond include approximately 1,000 county, city, and Tribal jail 
authorities (929 respondents to the ASJ and 82 to the SJIC). As 
community institutions that book an estimated 12 million inmates per 
year, local jails are an integral part of the justice system, operating 
at the front end (that is, following arrest or referral) as well as the 
back end (discharging inmates and holding those sentenced to jail). 
Their broad functions include handling inmates who are awaiting trial 
or sentencing, holding inmates for other authorities, detaining inmates 
with special needs such as mental health holds or alcohol 
detoxifications, transferring inmates to court appearances and bringing 
them back to detention, discharging inmates at the behest of the court 
or other entities, and holding inmates who have been sentenced to terms 
in jail. The set of collections in this package provides BJS with the 
capacity to track and analyze changes in the jail inmate population 
that might signal changes in the kinds of cases coming into or leaving 
the criminal justice system, and to analyze how the volatility of jail 
inmate populations affects the workload of jails and their capacities 
to provide services. The parallel structure of the SJIC collection 
provides BJS with this capacity for Indian country jails.
    In its entirety, this collection is the only national effort 
devoted to describing and understanding annual changes in jail 
populations as well as assessing programs and capacities to provide 
services. The collection enables BJS, other federal agencies, and 
state, local, and Tribal corrections authorities and administrators, as 
well as legislators, researchers, and jail planners to track growth in 
the number of jails and their capacities nationally; as well as, track 
changes in the demographics and supervision status of jail population 
and the prevalence of crowding.
    The forms and information content for this collection are outlined 
next in the following order: First, the components of the Annual Survey 
of Jails (ASJ), which include the CJ-5, CJ-5A, CJ-5D, and CJ-5DA. 
Second, the Survey of Jails in Indian Country (SJIC) includes the CJ-
5B.
    The two components of the Annual Survey of Jails include the CJ-5/
5A and CJ-5D/5DA forms. The CJ-5/5A forms are to be administered to ASJ 
sample elements that are selected with a probability of less than 1. 
The CJ-5D/5DA forms are to be administered to ASJ sample elements 
selected with certainty.

CJ-5 and CJ-5A

    For these forms, 555 respondents from sampled county and city jails 
will be asked to provide information for the following categories:
    (a) At midyear (last weekday in the month of June), the number of 
inmates confined in jail facilities including; male and female adult 
and juvenile inmates; persons under age 18 held as adults; race 
categories; held for Federal authorities, State prison authorities and 
other local jail jurisdictions.
    (b) At midyear, the number of convicted inmates that are 
unsentenced or sentenced and the number of unconvicted inmates awaiting 
trial/arraignment, or transfers/holds for other authorities.
    (c) At midyear, the number of persons under jail supervision who 
were not U.S. citizens.
    (d) Whether the jail facilities has a weekend incarceration program 
prior to midyear and the number of inmates participating.
    (e) The number of new admissions into and final discharges from 
jail facilities during the last week in June.
    (f) The date and count for the greatest number of confined inmates 
during the 30-day period in June.
    (g) The average daily population of jail facilities from July 1 of 
the previous

[[Page 961]]

year to June 30 of the current collection year.
    (h) Jail capacity, measured three ways: rated capacity, operating 
capacity, and design capacity.
    (i) At midyear, the number of persons under jail supervision but 
not confined (e.g., electronic monitoring, day reporting, etc.).

CJ-5D and CJ-5DA

    These forms will be administered to the certainty jurisdictions in 
the ASJ sample; in addition to the information collected in the regular 
ASJ forms (the CJ-5/5A), the 374 respondents that are included with 
certainty in the ASJ sample survey will be asked to provide additional 
information on the flow of inmates going through jails and the 
distribution of time served, staff characteristics and assaults on 
staff resulting in death, and inmate misconduct. More specifically, 
these include:
    (a) The distribution of time served by inmates discharged during 
the final week of June, broken out by whether the inmates were 
convicted or unconvicted.
    (b) At midyear, the number of correctional officers and other staff 
employed by jail facilities;
    (c) From July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the current 
collection year: the number of inmate-inflicted physical assaults (and 
counts) on correctional officers and other staff and the number of 
staff deaths as a result.
    (d) From July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the current 
collection year: the number of inmates, by category, who were written 
up or found guilty of a rule violation.

CJ-5B

    The Survey of Jails in Indian Country is collected from Indian 
country correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or the 
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) (currently there are 82) will be asked 
to provide information for the following categories:
    (a) At midyear (last weekday in the month of June), the number of 
inmates confined in jail facilities including; male and female adult 
and juvenile inmates; persons under age 18 held as adults; convicted 
and unconvicted males and females; persons held for a felony, 
misdemeanor; their most serious offense (e.g., domestic violence 
offense, aggravated or simple assault, burglary, public intoxication, 
driving while intoxicated, etc.)
    (b) The average daily population during the 30-day period in June;
    (c) The date and count for the greatest number of confined inmates 
during the 30-day period in June;
    (d) The number of new admissions into and final discharges during 
the month of June;
    (e) From July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the current 
collection year: the number of inmate deaths while confined and the 
number of deaths attributed to suicide and the number of confined 
inmates that attempted suicide;
    (f) At midyear, the total rated capacity of jail facilities;
    (g) At midyear, the number correctional staff employed by the 
facility and their occupation (e.g., administration, jail operations, 
educational staff, etc.);
    (h) At midyear, how many jail operations employees had received the 
basic detention officer certification and how many had received 40 
hours of in-service training;
    (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount 
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: Six hundred and 
thirty-seven respondents each taking an average 75 minutes to respond 
for collection forms CJ-5 and CJ-5A, and CJ-5B. Three hundred and 
seventy-four respondents each taking 120 minutes to respond for 
collection forms CJ-5D and CJ-5DA.
    (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated 
with the collection: There are an estimated 1,544 total burden hours 
associated with this collection.
    If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, 
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, 
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two 
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 1407B, Washington, DC 
20530.

    Dated: January 2, 2013.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2013-00040 Filed 1-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.