Civil Monetary Penalties, 672-675 [2012-31712]
Download as PDF
672
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 3
Friday, January 4, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR Part 3560
RIN 0575AC93
Civil Monetary Penalties
Rural Housing Service, USDA.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Rural Housing Service
(RHS or Agency) proposes to implement
two civil monetary penalty provisions.
First, RHS proposes to amend its
regulations to create a new section, for
imposing civil monetary penalties under
the authority of 42 U.S.C. 1490s (section
543 of the Housing Act of 1949, as
amended (Act)) (Housing Act CMP).
Second, RHS proposes to adopt the
USDA civil monetary penalty provisions
for the Program Fraud Civil Remedies
Act of 1986 (PFCRA) in a revision to an
existing section (PFCRA CMP). The new
section will include an amended
version of the existing Housing Act CMP
provision together with additional
language providing procedural
guidance.
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received on or before February 4, 2013
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to this proposed rule by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments via
the U.S. Postal Service to the Branch
Chief, Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, STOP 0742, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0742.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit
written comments via Federal Express
mail or other courier service requiring a
street address to the Branch Chief,
Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
of Agriculture, 300 7th Street SW., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20024.
All written comments will be
available for public inspection during
regular work hours at the 300 7th Street
SW., 7th Floor, address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie White, Director, Multi-Family
Housing Portfolio Management
Division, Rural Housing Service, Stop
0782, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0782,
Telephone: 202–720–1615.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866—Classification
This proposed rule has been
determined to be non-significant and
was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
Executive Order 12866.
Authority
The Housing Act CMP provision is
authorized under section 543(b) of the
Housing Act of 1949, as amended (42
U.S.C. 1490s(b)). The PFCRA is codified
at 31 U.S.C. 3801–3812. PFCRA
establishes an administrative remedy
against any person who makes a false,
fictitious, or fraudulent claim or written
statement to certain federal agencies,
such as the United States Department of
Agriculture.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in
accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G. RHS has determined that this
action does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the environment. In
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
Public Law 91–190, an Environmental
Impact Statement is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
with regard to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612). Under Section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the Agency has determined and
certified by signature on this document
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities since this
rulemaking action does not involve a
new or expanded program nor does it
require any more action on the part of
a small business than required of a large
entity.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this rule do
not have any substantial direct effect on
States, on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of Government. This rule does not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local Governments;
therefore, consultation with the States is
not required.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988. In accordance
with this rule: (1) Unless otherwise
specifically provided, all State and local
laws that are in conflict with this rule
will be preempted; (2) no retroactive
effect will be given to this rule except
as specifically prescribed in the rule;
and (3) administrative proceedings of
the National Appeals Division of the
Department of Agriculture (7 CFR part
11) must be exhausted before bringing
suit in court that challenges action taken
under this rule.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act
(UMRA)
Title II of the UMRA, Public Law 104–
4, establishes requirements for Federal
Agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions on State, local, and
tribal Governments and on the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
Federal Agencies generally must
prepare a written statement, including
cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and
Final Rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’
that may result in expenditures to State,
local, or tribal Governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any 1 year.
When such a statement is needed for a
rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally
requires a Federal Agency to identify
and consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, more cost-effective, or least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule. This rule
contains no Federal mandates (under
the regulatory provisions of title II of the
UMRA) for State, local, and tribal
governments or for the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA.
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The revisions in this rulemaking for 7
CFR part 3560 are subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act package with
the assigned OMB control number of
0575–0189. No changes are being
proposed that would impact that
package.
E-Government Act Compliance
RHS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services and for other purposes.
Programs Affected
The programs affected by this
regulation are listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance under
Section 514 program and Section 516
program (10.405); Section 515 program
(10.415); Section 521 (10.427); and
Section 542 (10.448).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This executive order imposes
requirements on RHS in the
development of regulatory policies that
have tribal implications or preempt
tribal laws. RHS has determined that the
proposed rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribe(s) or on either the
relationship or the distribution of
powers and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and the Indian
tribes. Thus, the proposed rule is not
subject to the requirements of Executive
Order 13175. If tribal leaders are
interested in consulting with RHS on
this proposed rule, they are encouraged
to contact USDA’s Office of Tribal
Relations or Rural Development’s Native
American Coordinator at (720) 544–
2911 or AIAN@wdc.usda.gov to request
such consultation.
Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs
These loans and grants are subject to
the provisions of Executive Order 12372
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. RHS conducts
intergovernmental consultations for
each loan and grant in a manner
delineated in 7 CFR part 3015 subpart
V.
Background
USDA implemented the Program
Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 in
regulations at 7 CFR part 1, subpart L.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
The Agency is proposing to incorporate
those regulations in this rule.
Section 543(b) of the Act states that
the Secretary may, after notice and
opportunity for a hearing, impose a civil
monetary penalty against any person,
including its owners, officers, directors,
general partners, limited partners, or
employees, who knowingly and
materially violate, or participate in the
violation of the Act, or the regulations
and agreements used to implement the
Act. Such violations include:
(A) Submitting information to the
Secretary that is false;
(B) Providing the Secretary with false
certifications;
(C) Failing to submit information
requested by the Secretary in a timely
manner;
(D) Failing to maintain the property
subject to loans made or guaranteed
under the Act in good repair and
condition, as determined by the
Secretary;
(E) Failing to provide acceptable
management for a project which
received a loan made or guaranteed
under the Act that is acceptable to the
Secretary; or
(F) Failing to comply with the
provisions of applicable civil rights
statutes and regulations.
In 2004, the Agency included Housing
Act CMPs in 7 CFR 3560.461(b) with
limited procedural detail. Consequently,
the Agency has found Housing Act
CMPs to not be an effective remedy.
This proposed rule will provide
sufficient procedural detail to enable the
Agency to utilize Housing Act CMPs
while at the same time providing due
process protection to program
participants. By implementing
procedures for Housing Act CMPs, the
Agency will be provided an important
tool to enforce compliance with relevant
statutes, regulations, and loan
documents. The Agency’s Housing Act
CMP amount will be published in 7 CFR
part 3, subpart I.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 3560
Aged, Loan programs-Agriculture,
Loan programs-Housing and
Community Development, Low and
moderate income housing, Public
housing, Rent subsidies.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, chapter XXXV, Title 7 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 3560—DIRECT MULTI-FAMILY
HOUSING LOANS AND GRANTS
1. The authority citation for part 3560
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1480.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
673
Subpart J—Special Servicing,
Enforcement, Liquidation, and Other
Actions
2. Amend § 3560.461 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 3560.461
Enforcement provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Civil monetary penalties. (1) This
section is in accordance with the
Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of
1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801–U.S.C. 3831)
which provides for civil penalties and
assessments against persons who make,
submit, or present, or cause to be made,
submitted, or presented, false, fictitious,
or fraudulent claims or written
statements to Federal authorities or to
their agents.
(2) Proceedings under this section
will be in accordance with subpart L of
7 CFR part 1, ‘‘Procedures Related to
Administrative Hearings under the
Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of
1986.’’
(3) The Administrator of the Rural
Housing Service, or designee, is
authorized to serve as Agency Fraud
Claims Officer for the purposes of
implementing the requirements of this
subsection.
(4) Civil penalties and assessments
imposed pursuant to this section are in
addition to any other remedies that
maybe prescribed by law or imposed
under this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Add § 3560.464 to read as follows:
§ 3560.464
Civil monetary penalties.
(a) The Agency may impose a civil
monetary penalty in accordance with
this section against any individual or
entity, including its owners, officers,
general partners, limited partners, or
employees (Respondent(s), who
knowingly and materially violate, or
participate in the violation of, the
provisions of the programs covered by
this part or agreements made in
furtherance of those programs.
‘‘Knowingly’’ includes having actual
knowledge of or acting with deliberate
ignorance of or reckless disregard for the
prohibitions under this part. Actions
covered include, but are not limited to:
(1) Submitting information to the
Agency that is false.
(2) Providing the Agency with false
certifications.
(3) Failing to submit information
requested by the Agency in a timely
manner.
(4) Failing to maintain the property
subject to loans or grants made under
the programs covered by this part in
good repair and condition, as
determined by the Agency.
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
674
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(5) Failing to provide management for
a project that received a loan or grant
made under this part that is acceptable
to the Agency. Such failures include,
without limitation, failure to provide
fiscal management in accordance with
Agency regulations including failure to
maintain reserve accounts and
unauthorized use of fund in such
reserve accounts, failure to handle
vacancies in accordance with Agency
regulations, and failure to handle rent
collection in accordance with Agency
regulations.
(6) Failing to comply with the
provisions of applicable civil rights
statutes and regulations.
(b) Amount. (1) Civil penalties shall
be assessed and adjusted in accordance
with 7 CFR part 3, subpart I or its
successor regulation and must be
subject to a fine per violation of not
more than the amount specified in that
subpart.
(2) In determining the amount of a
civil monetary penalty under this
section, the Agency must take into
consideration:
(i) The gravity of the offense;
(ii) Any history of prior offenses by
the Respondent (including offenses
occurring prior to the enactment of this
section);
(iii) Any injury to tenants;
(iv) Any injury to the public;
(v) Any benefits received by the
Respondent as a result of the violation;
(vi) Deterrence of future violations;
(vii) The degree of the Respondent’s
culpability; and
(viii) The Respondent’s ability to pay
the penalty, which ability shall be
presumed unless raised as an
affirmative defense or mitigating factor
by the Respondent. The ability to pay is
determined based on an assessment of
the Respondent’s resources available
both presently and prospectively from
which the Agency could ultimately
recover the total award, which may be
predicted based on historical evidence.
(3) Payment of penalties. No payment
of a penalty assessed under this section
may be made from funds provided
under any program covered by this part
or from funds of a project which serve
as security for a loan made from a
program covered by this part.
(c) Agency Official. The Administrator
of the Rural Housing Service, or
designee, (Agency Official) may initiate
a civil money penalty proceeding
against a Respondent who has
committed any of the actions referenced
in paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Pre-penalty notice. Prior to
determining whether to issue a
complaint under paragraph (f) of this
section, the Agency Official shall issue
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
a written pre-penalty notice to the
Respondent. This pre-penalty notice
shall include the following:
(1) That the Rural Housing Service is
considering seeking a civil money
penalty;
(2) The specific violations alleged;
(3) The maximum civil money penalty
that may be imposed;
(4) The opportunity to reply in
writing to the Agency Official within 30
days after the date of the notice;
(5) That failure to respond with the
30-day period may result in issuance of
a complaint under paragraph (f) of this
section without consideration of any
information that the Respondent may
wish to provide;
(6) That upon receipt of the prepenalty notice, the Respondent is
required to preserve and maintain all
documents and data, including
electronically stored data, within
Respondent’s possession or control that
may relate to the violations alleged in
the pre-penalty notice. The Agency shall
also preserve such documents or data
upon the issuance of the pre-penalty
notice;
(7) That any response to the prepenalty notice shall be in a format
prescribed in the pre-penalty notice,
and shall address the factors in
subsection (a), any arguments opposing
the imposition of a civil money penalty,
and any affirmative defense or
mitigating factor concerning the
Respondent’s ability to pay the
proposed civil money penalty,
including documentary evidence to
support any of Respondent’s arguments
or defenses; and.
(8) That if a complaint is issued under
§ 3560.464(f), the Respondent may
request a hearing before an
administrative law judge. Proceedings
under this section will be in accordance
with subpart L of 7 CFR part 1.
(e) Response. (1) The response shall
be in a format prescribed in the prepenalty notice. The response shall
address the factors set forth in
paragraph (d) of this section and include
any arguments opposing the imposition
of a civil money penalty that the
Respondent may wish to present.
(2) In any case where Respondent
seeks to raise ability to pay as an
affirmative defense or argument in
mitigation, the Respondent shall
provide documentary evidence as part
of its response.
(f) Complaint. (1) Upon the expiration
of the 30-day response period for the
pre-penalty notice, the Agency Official
shall determine whether to seek a civil
money penalty. Such determination
shall be based upon a review of the prepenalty notice, the response, if any, and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the factors listed in paragraph (a)(2) of
this section.
(2) If a determination is made to seek
a civil money penalty, a complaint shall
be served upon the Respondent and
simultaneously filed with the USDA
Office of the Administrative Law Judges,
providing the following:
(i) The factual basis for the decision
to seek a penalty;
(ii) The applicable civil money
penalty statute;
(iii) The amount of penalty sought;
(iv) The right to submit a response in
writing, within 15 days of receipt of the
complaint, requesting a hearing on any
material fact in the complaint, or on the
appropriateness of the penalty sought;
(v) The address to which a response
must be sent;
(vi) That the failure to submit a
response may result in the imposition of
the penalty in the amount sought.
(3) The complaint shall be served
upon the Respondent by first class mail
or personal delivery.
(g) Response to the complaint. (1) In
any case in which the Respondent has
requested a hearing, the Respondent
shall serve upon the Agency Official
and file with the USDA Office of
Administrative Law Judges a written
answer to the complaint within 30 days
of receipt of the complaint, unless such
time is extended by the administrative
law judge for good cause. The answer
shall include the admission or denial of
each allegation of liability made in the
complaint; any defense on which the
Respondent intends to rely; any reasons
why the civil money penalty should be
less than the amount sought in the
complaint, based on the factors listed in
(a)(2); and the name, address, and
telephone number of the person who
will act as the Respondent’s
representative, if any.
(2) If no response is submitted, then
the Agency Official may file a motion
for default judgment, together with a
copy of the complaint, in accordance
with subpart L of 7 CFR part 1.
(h) Hearings under this part shall be
conducted in accordance with the
procedures applicable to hearings in
accordance with subpart L of part 1 of
title 7.
(i) Settlement of a civil money penalty
action. The Agency Official is
authorized to settle civil money penalty
actions that may be brought under this
section.
(j) Remedies for noncompliance.—(1)
Judicial intervention. If a Respondent
fails to comply with a final
determination of the Agency imposing a
civil monetary penalty, the Agency may
request the Attorney General of the
United States to bring an action in an
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
appropriate District Court to obtain a
monetary judgment against the
Respondent and such other relief as may
be available. The monetary judgment
may, in the court’s discretion, include
attorney’s fees and other expenses
incurred by the United States in
connection with the action.
(2) Reviewability of determination. In
an action under this paragraph, the
validity and appropriateness of a
determination by the Agency imposing
the penalty shall not be subject to
review.
(k) Application of other remedies. A
civil money penalty may be imposed in
addition to other administrative
sanctions or any other civil remedy or
criminal penalty.
Dated: November 15, 2012.
Tammye Trevino,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–31712 Filed 1–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket Number EERE–2012–BT–TP–0024]
RIN 1904–AC79
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Test Procedure
for Residential Furnaces and Boilers
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) is initiating a rulemaking
and data collection process to consider
amendments to DOE’s test procedure for
residential furnaces and boilers.
Because DOE has recently completed a
test procedure rulemaking for the
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption of these products, the
primary focus of this rulemaking will be
on active mode operation. This
rulemaking is intended to fulfill DOE’s
statutory obligation to review its test
procedures for covered products at least
once every seven years. To inform
interested parties and to facilitate the
process, DOE has gathered data and has
identified several issues that might
warrant modifications to the currently
applicable test procedures, including
topics on which DOE is particularly
interested in receiving comment. In
overview, the issues outlined in this
document mainly concern reducing the
test burden, test conditions impacting
the annual fuel utilization efficiency
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
(AFUE) metric, test conditions
impacting non-AFUE efficiency
parameters, the performance test for
automatic means in boilers,
harmonization of standards, alternative
methods for furnace/boiler efficiency
determination, and scope. These topics
(and others which commenters identify)
are ones which DOE anticipates may
lead to proposed test procedure
amendments in a subsequent notice of
proposed rulemaking (NOPR). DOE
welcomes written comments from the
public on any subject related to the test
procedures for residential furnaces and
boilers, including topics not specifically
raised in this RFI.
DATES: Written comments and
information are requested on or before
February 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Alternatively, interested persons may
submit comments, identified by docket
number EERE–2011–BT–TP–0024 and/
or RIN 1904–AC79, by any of the
following methods:
• Email: Res-Furnaces-Boilers-2012TP-0024@ee.doe.gov. Include EERE–
2012–BT–TP–0024 and/or RIN 1904–
AC79 in the subject line of the message.
Submit electronic comments in
WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or
ASCII file format, and avoid the use of
special characters or any form of
encryption.
• Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards,
U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585– 0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–2945. If possible,
please submit all items on a compact
disc (CD), in which case it is not
necessary to include printed copies.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 6th
Floor, 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW.,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 586–2945. If possible, please
submit all items on a CD, in which case
it is not necessary to include printed
copies.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this
rulemaking. No telefacsimilies (faxes)
will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see section III of
this document (Public Participation).
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
675
comments received, go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information may
be sent to Mr. Mohammed Khan, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
Building Technologies Program, EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–7892. Email:
residential_furnaces_and_boilers@
ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–9507. Email:
Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
For information on how to submit or
review public comments, contact Ms.
Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Email:
Brend.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
II. Discussion
A. Reducing Test Burden
B. Test Conditions Impacting Energy
Efficiency (AFUE) Performance
C. Test Conditions Impacting Non-AFUE
Efficiency Parameters
D. Performance Test for Automatic Means
in Boilers
E. Harmonization of Standards
F. Alternative Methods for Furnace/Boiler
Efficiency Determination
G. Scope
H. Standby Mode and Off Mode
I. Other Issues
III. Public Participation
I. Authority and Background
Title III, Part B,1 of the Energy Policy
and Conservation Act of 1975 (‘‘EPCA’’
or ‘‘the Act’’), Public Law 94–163 (42
U.S.C. 6291–6309, as codified) sets forth
a variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency and
establishes the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles,2 including
residential furnaces and boilers. (42
U.S.C. 6291(1)–(2) and 6292(a)(5))
1 This part was originally titled Part B. It was
redesignated Part A in the United States Code for
editorial reasons.
2 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007, Public Law
110–140 (Dec. 19, 2007).
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 672-675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31712]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 672]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR Part 3560
RIN 0575AC93
Civil Monetary Penalties
AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Rural Housing Service (RHS or Agency) proposes to
implement two civil monetary penalty provisions. First, RHS proposes to
amend its regulations to create a new section, for imposing civil
monetary penalties under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 1490s (section 543
of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended (Act)) (Housing Act CMP).
Second, RHS proposes to adopt the USDA civil monetary penalty
provisions for the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (PFCRA) in
a revision to an existing section (PFCRA CMP). The new section will
include an amended version of the existing Housing Act CMP provision
together with additional language providing procedural guidance.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 4, 2013
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to this proposed rule by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Submit written comments via the U.S. Postal Service
to the Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, STOP 0742, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-0742.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit written comments via Federal
Express mail or other courier service requiring a street address to the
Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 300 7th Street SW., 7th Floor, Washington,
DC 20024.
All written comments will be available for public inspection during
regular work hours at the 300 7th Street SW., 7th Floor, address listed
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie White, Director, Multi-
Family Housing Portfolio Management Division, Rural Housing Service,
Stop 0782, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-0782,
Telephone: 202-720-1615.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866--Classification
This proposed rule has been determined to be non-significant and
was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
Executive Order 12866.
Authority
The Housing Act CMP provision is authorized under section 543(b) of
the Housing Act of 1949, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1490s(b)). The PFCRA is
codified at 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812. PFCRA establishes an administrative
remedy against any person who makes a false, fictitious, or fraudulent
claim or written statement to certain federal agencies, such as the
United States Department of Agriculture.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G. RHS has determined that this action does not constitute a
major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the
environment. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969, Public Law 91-190, an Environmental Impact Statement is not
required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed with regard to the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612).
Under Section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the Agency has determined and certified by signature on this
document that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities since this rulemaking action
does not involve a new or expanded program nor does it require any more
action on the part of a small business than required of a large entity.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this rule do not have any substantial
direct effect on States, on the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of Government. This rule does
not impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local
Governments; therefore, consultation with the States is not required.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988. In
accordance with this rule: (1) Unless otherwise specifically provided,
all State and local laws that are in conflict with this rule will be
preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this rule except
as specifically prescribed in the rule; and (3) administrative
proceedings of the National Appeals Division of the Department of
Agriculture (7 CFR part 11) must be exhausted before bringing suit in
court that challenges action taken under this rule.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act (UMRA)
Title II of the UMRA, Public Law 104-4, establishes requirements
for Federal Agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions
on State, local, and tribal Governments and on the private sector.
Under section 202 of the UMRA, Federal Agencies generally must prepare
a written statement, including cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and
Final Rules with ``Federal mandates'' that may result in expenditures
to State, local, or tribal Governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector, of $100 million or more in any 1 year. When such a
statement is needed for a rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally
requires a Federal Agency to identify and consider a reasonable number
of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, more cost-
effective, or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or for the private sector. Therefore, this rule is
not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
[[Page 673]]
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The revisions in this rulemaking for 7 CFR part 3560 are subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act package with the assigned OMB control
number of 0575-0189. No changes are being proposed that would impact
that package.
E-Government Act Compliance
RHS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services and for other purposes.
Programs Affected
The programs affected by this regulation are listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under Section 514 program and Section
516 program (10.405); Section 515 program (10.415); Section 521
(10.427); and Section 542 (10.448).
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This executive order imposes requirements on RHS in the development
of regulatory policies that have tribal implications or preempt tribal
laws. RHS has determined that the proposed rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribe(s) or on either
the relationship or the distribution of powers and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes. Thus, the
proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of Executive Order
13175. If tribal leaders are interested in consulting with RHS on this
proposed rule, they are encouraged to contact USDA's Office of Tribal
Relations or Rural Development's Native American Coordinator at (720)
544-2911 or AIAN@wdc.usda.gov to request such consultation.
Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs
These loans and grants are subject to the provisions of Executive
Order 12372 which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. RHS conducts intergovernmental consultations for each
loan and grant in a manner delineated in 7 CFR part 3015 subpart V.
Background
USDA implemented the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 in
regulations at 7 CFR part 1, subpart L. The Agency is proposing to
incorporate those regulations in this rule.
Section 543(b) of the Act states that the Secretary may, after
notice and opportunity for a hearing, impose a civil monetary penalty
against any person, including its owners, officers, directors, general
partners, limited partners, or employees, who knowingly and materially
violate, or participate in the violation of the Act, or the regulations
and agreements used to implement the Act. Such violations include:
(A) Submitting information to the Secretary that is false;
(B) Providing the Secretary with false certifications;
(C) Failing to submit information requested by the Secretary in a
timely manner;
(D) Failing to maintain the property subject to loans made or
guaranteed under the Act in good repair and condition, as determined by
the Secretary;
(E) Failing to provide acceptable management for a project which
received a loan made or guaranteed under the Act that is acceptable to
the Secretary; or
(F) Failing to comply with the provisions of applicable civil
rights statutes and regulations.
In 2004, the Agency included Housing Act CMPs in 7 CFR 3560.461(b)
with limited procedural detail. Consequently, the Agency has found
Housing Act CMPs to not be an effective remedy. This proposed rule will
provide sufficient procedural detail to enable the Agency to utilize
Housing Act CMPs while at the same time providing due process
protection to program participants. By implementing procedures for
Housing Act CMPs, the Agency will be provided an important tool to
enforce compliance with relevant statutes, regulations, and loan
documents. The Agency's Housing Act CMP amount will be published in 7
CFR part 3, subpart I.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 3560
Aged, Loan programs-Agriculture, Loan programs-Housing and
Community Development, Low and moderate income housing, Public housing,
Rent subsidies.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, chapter XXXV, Title 7 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 3560--DIRECT MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING LOANS AND GRANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3560 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1480.
Subpart J--Special Servicing, Enforcement, Liquidation, and Other
Actions
0
2. Amend Sec. 3560.461 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 3560.461 Enforcement provisions.
* * * * *
(b) Civil monetary penalties. (1) This section is in accordance
with the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801-
U.S.C. 3831) which provides for civil penalties and assessments against
persons who make, submit, or present, or cause to be made, submitted,
or presented, false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or written
statements to Federal authorities or to their agents.
(2) Proceedings under this section will be in accordance with
subpart L of 7 CFR part 1, ``Procedures Related to Administrative
Hearings under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986.''
(3) The Administrator of the Rural Housing Service, or designee, is
authorized to serve as Agency Fraud Claims Officer for the purposes of
implementing the requirements of this subsection.
(4) Civil penalties and assessments imposed pursuant to this
section are in addition to any other remedies that maybe prescribed by
law or imposed under this subpart.
* * * * *
0
3. Add Sec. 3560.464 to read as follows:
Sec. 3560.464 Civil monetary penalties.
(a) The Agency may impose a civil monetary penalty in accordance
with this section against any individual or entity, including its
owners, officers, general partners, limited partners, or employees
(Respondent(s), who knowingly and materially violate, or participate in
the violation of, the provisions of the programs covered by this part
or agreements made in furtherance of those programs. ``Knowingly''
includes having actual knowledge of or acting with deliberate ignorance
of or reckless disregard for the prohibitions under this part. Actions
covered include, but are not limited to:
(1) Submitting information to the Agency that is false.
(2) Providing the Agency with false certifications.
(3) Failing to submit information requested by the Agency in a
timely manner.
(4) Failing to maintain the property subject to loans or grants
made under the programs covered by this part in good repair and
condition, as determined by the Agency.
[[Page 674]]
(5) Failing to provide management for a project that received a
loan or grant made under this part that is acceptable to the Agency.
Such failures include, without limitation, failure to provide fiscal
management in accordance with Agency regulations including failure to
maintain reserve accounts and unauthorized use of fund in such reserve
accounts, failure to handle vacancies in accordance with Agency
regulations, and failure to handle rent collection in accordance with
Agency regulations.
(6) Failing to comply with the provisions of applicable civil
rights statutes and regulations.
(b) Amount. (1) Civil penalties shall be assessed and adjusted in
accordance with 7 CFR part 3, subpart I or its successor regulation and
must be subject to a fine per violation of not more than the amount
specified in that subpart.
(2) In determining the amount of a civil monetary penalty under
this section, the Agency must take into consideration:
(i) The gravity of the offense;
(ii) Any history of prior offenses by the Respondent (including
offenses occurring prior to the enactment of this section);
(iii) Any injury to tenants;
(iv) Any injury to the public;
(v) Any benefits received by the Respondent as a result of the
violation;
(vi) Deterrence of future violations;
(vii) The degree of the Respondent's culpability; and
(viii) The Respondent's ability to pay the penalty, which ability
shall be presumed unless raised as an affirmative defense or mitigating
factor by the Respondent. The ability to pay is determined based on an
assessment of the Respondent's resources available both presently and
prospectively from which the Agency could ultimately recover the total
award, which may be predicted based on historical evidence.
(3) Payment of penalties. No payment of a penalty assessed under
this section may be made from funds provided under any program covered
by this part or from funds of a project which serve as security for a
loan made from a program covered by this part.
(c) Agency Official. The Administrator of the Rural Housing
Service, or designee, (Agency Official) may initiate a civil money
penalty proceeding against a Respondent who has committed any of the
actions referenced in paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Pre-penalty notice. Prior to determining whether to issue a
complaint under paragraph (f) of this section, the Agency Official
shall issue a written pre-penalty notice to the Respondent. This pre-
penalty notice shall include the following:
(1) That the Rural Housing Service is considering seeking a civil
money penalty;
(2) The specific violations alleged;
(3) The maximum civil money penalty that may be imposed;
(4) The opportunity to reply in writing to the Agency Official
within 30 days after the date of the notice;
(5) That failure to respond with the 30-day period may result in
issuance of a complaint under paragraph (f) of this section without
consideration of any information that the Respondent may wish to
provide;
(6) That upon receipt of the pre-penalty notice, the Respondent is
required to preserve and maintain all documents and data, including
electronically stored data, within Respondent's possession or control
that may relate to the violations alleged in the pre-penalty notice.
The Agency shall also preserve such documents or data upon the issuance
of the pre-penalty notice;
(7) That any response to the pre-penalty notice shall be in a
format prescribed in the pre-penalty notice, and shall address the
factors in subsection (a), any arguments opposing the imposition of a
civil money penalty, and any affirmative defense or mitigating factor
concerning the Respondent's ability to pay the proposed civil money
penalty, including documentary evidence to support any of Respondent's
arguments or defenses; and.
(8) That if a complaint is issued under Sec. 3560.464(f), the
Respondent may request a hearing before an administrative law judge.
Proceedings under this section will be in accordance with subpart L of
7 CFR part 1.
(e) Response. (1) The response shall be in a format prescribed in
the pre-penalty notice. The response shall address the factors set
forth in paragraph (d) of this section and include any arguments
opposing the imposition of a civil money penalty that the Respondent
may wish to present.
(2) In any case where Respondent seeks to raise ability to pay as
an affirmative defense or argument in mitigation, the Respondent shall
provide documentary evidence as part of its response.
(f) Complaint. (1) Upon the expiration of the 30-day response
period for the pre-penalty notice, the Agency Official shall determine
whether to seek a civil money penalty. Such determination shall be
based upon a review of the pre-penalty notice, the response, if any,
and the factors listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) If a determination is made to seek a civil money penalty, a
complaint shall be served upon the Respondent and simultaneously filed
with the USDA Office of the Administrative Law Judges, providing the
following:
(i) The factual basis for the decision to seek a penalty;
(ii) The applicable civil money penalty statute;
(iii) The amount of penalty sought;
(iv) The right to submit a response in writing, within 15 days of
receipt of the complaint, requesting a hearing on any material fact in
the complaint, or on the appropriateness of the penalty sought;
(v) The address to which a response must be sent;
(vi) That the failure to submit a response may result in the
imposition of the penalty in the amount sought.
(3) The complaint shall be served upon the Respondent by first
class mail or personal delivery.
(g) Response to the complaint. (1) In any case in which the
Respondent has requested a hearing, the Respondent shall serve upon the
Agency Official and file with the USDA Office of Administrative Law
Judges a written answer to the complaint within 30 days of receipt of
the complaint, unless such time is extended by the administrative law
judge for good cause. The answer shall include the admission or denial
of each allegation of liability made in the complaint; any defense on
which the Respondent intends to rely; any reasons why the civil money
penalty should be less than the amount sought in the complaint, based
on the factors listed in (a)(2); and the name, address, and telephone
number of the person who will act as the Respondent's representative,
if any.
(2) If no response is submitted, then the Agency Official may file
a motion for default judgment, together with a copy of the complaint,
in accordance with subpart L of 7 CFR part 1.
(h) Hearings under this part shall be conducted in accordance with
the procedures applicable to hearings in accordance with subpart L of
part 1 of title 7.
(i) Settlement of a civil money penalty action. The Agency Official
is authorized to settle civil money penalty actions that may be brought
under this section.
(j) Remedies for noncompliance.--(1) Judicial intervention. If a
Respondent fails to comply with a final determination of the Agency
imposing a civil monetary penalty, the Agency may request the Attorney
General of the United States to bring an action in an
[[Page 675]]
appropriate District Court to obtain a monetary judgment against the
Respondent and such other relief as may be available. The monetary
judgment may, in the court's discretion, include attorney's fees and
other expenses incurred by the United States in connection with the
action.
(2) Reviewability of determination. In an action under this
paragraph, the validity and appropriateness of a determination by the
Agency imposing the penalty shall not be subject to review.
(k) Application of other remedies. A civil money penalty may be
imposed in addition to other administrative sanctions or any other
civil remedy or criminal penalty.
Dated: November 15, 2012.
Tammye Trevino,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-31712 Filed 1-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P