Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedure for Residential Furnaces and Boilers, 675-679 [2012-31700]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
appropriate District Court to obtain a
monetary judgment against the
Respondent and such other relief as may
be available. The monetary judgment
may, in the court’s discretion, include
attorney’s fees and other expenses
incurred by the United States in
connection with the action.
(2) Reviewability of determination. In
an action under this paragraph, the
validity and appropriateness of a
determination by the Agency imposing
the penalty shall not be subject to
review.
(k) Application of other remedies. A
civil money penalty may be imposed in
addition to other administrative
sanctions or any other civil remedy or
criminal penalty.
Dated: November 15, 2012.
Tammye Trevino,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–31712 Filed 1–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket Number EERE–2012–BT–TP–0024]
RIN 1904–AC79
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Test Procedure
for Residential Furnaces and Boilers
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) is initiating a rulemaking
and data collection process to consider
amendments to DOE’s test procedure for
residential furnaces and boilers.
Because DOE has recently completed a
test procedure rulemaking for the
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption of these products, the
primary focus of this rulemaking will be
on active mode operation. This
rulemaking is intended to fulfill DOE’s
statutory obligation to review its test
procedures for covered products at least
once every seven years. To inform
interested parties and to facilitate the
process, DOE has gathered data and has
identified several issues that might
warrant modifications to the currently
applicable test procedures, including
topics on which DOE is particularly
interested in receiving comment. In
overview, the issues outlined in this
document mainly concern reducing the
test burden, test conditions impacting
the annual fuel utilization efficiency
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
(AFUE) metric, test conditions
impacting non-AFUE efficiency
parameters, the performance test for
automatic means in boilers,
harmonization of standards, alternative
methods for furnace/boiler efficiency
determination, and scope. These topics
(and others which commenters identify)
are ones which DOE anticipates may
lead to proposed test procedure
amendments in a subsequent notice of
proposed rulemaking (NOPR). DOE
welcomes written comments from the
public on any subject related to the test
procedures for residential furnaces and
boilers, including topics not specifically
raised in this RFI.
DATES: Written comments and
information are requested on or before
February 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Alternatively, interested persons may
submit comments, identified by docket
number EERE–2011–BT–TP–0024 and/
or RIN 1904–AC79, by any of the
following methods:
• Email: Res-Furnaces-Boilers-2012TP-0024@ee.doe.gov. Include EERE–
2012–BT–TP–0024 and/or RIN 1904–
AC79 in the subject line of the message.
Submit electronic comments in
WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or
ASCII file format, and avoid the use of
special characters or any form of
encryption.
• Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards,
U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585– 0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–2945. If possible,
please submit all items on a compact
disc (CD), in which case it is not
necessary to include printed copies.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 6th
Floor, 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW.,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 586–2945. If possible, please
submit all items on a CD, in which case
it is not necessary to include printed
copies.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this
rulemaking. No telefacsimilies (faxes)
will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see section III of
this document (Public Participation).
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
675
comments received, go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information may
be sent to Mr. Mohammed Khan, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
Building Technologies Program, EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–7892. Email:
residential_furnaces_and_boilers@
ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–9507. Email:
Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
For information on how to submit or
review public comments, contact Ms.
Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Email:
Brend.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
II. Discussion
A. Reducing Test Burden
B. Test Conditions Impacting Energy
Efficiency (AFUE) Performance
C. Test Conditions Impacting Non-AFUE
Efficiency Parameters
D. Performance Test for Automatic Means
in Boilers
E. Harmonization of Standards
F. Alternative Methods for Furnace/Boiler
Efficiency Determination
G. Scope
H. Standby Mode and Off Mode
I. Other Issues
III. Public Participation
I. Authority and Background
Title III, Part B,1 of the Energy Policy
and Conservation Act of 1975 (‘‘EPCA’’
or ‘‘the Act’’), Public Law 94–163 (42
U.S.C. 6291–6309, as codified) sets forth
a variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency and
establishes the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles,2 including
residential furnaces and boilers. (42
U.S.C. 6291(1)–(2) and 6292(a)(5))
1 This part was originally titled Part B. It was
redesignated Part A in the United States Code for
editorial reasons.
2 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007, Public Law
110–140 (Dec. 19, 2007).
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
676
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Under the Act, this program consists
essentially of four parts: (1) Testing; (2)
labeling; (3) establishing Federal energy
conservation standards; and (4)
certification and enforcement
procedures. The testing requirements
consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must
use as both the basis for certifying to
DOE that their products comply with
applicable energy conservation
standards adopted pursuant to EPCA,
and for making representations about
the efficiency of those products. (42
U.S.C. 6293(c); 42 U.S.C. 6295(s))
Similarly, DOE must use these test
procedures to determine whether the
products comply with any relevant
standards adopted under EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6295(s))
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth
criteria and procedures that DOE must
follow when prescribing or amending
test procedures for covered products.
EPCA provides, in relevant part, that
any test procedures prescribed or
amended under this section must be
reasonably designed to produce test
results which measure energy
efficiency, energy use, or estimated
annual operating cost of a covered
product during a representative average
use cycle or period of use, and must not
be unduly burdensome to conduct. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
In addition, if DOE determines that a
test procedure amendment is warranted,
it must publish proposed test
procedures and offer the public an
opportunity to present oral and written
comments on them. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(2)) Finally, in any rulemaking to
amend a test procedure, DOE must
determine the extent to which the
proposed test procedure would alter the
product’s measured energy efficiency.
(42 U.S.C. 6293(e)(1)) If DOE determines
that the amended test procedure would
alter the measured efficiency of a
covered product, DOE must amend the
applicable energy conservation standard
accordingly. (42 U.S.C. 6293(e)(2))
Further, the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007)
amended EPCA to require that at least
once every 7 years, DOE must review
test procedures for all covered products
and either amend the test procedures (if
the Secretary determines that amended
test procedures would more accurately
or fully comply with the requirements
of 42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) or publish
notice in the Federal Register of any
determination not to amend a test
procedure. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A))
Under this requirement, DOE must
review the test procedures for the
various types of residential furnace and
boiler products not later than December
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
19, 2014 (i.e., 7 years after the
enactment of EISA 2007). Thus, the final
rule resulting from this rulemaking will
satisfy the requirement to review the
test procedures for furnaces and boilers
within seven years of the enactment of
EPCA.
DOE’s test procedure for residential
furnaces and boilers is found at 10 CFR
430.23(n) and 10 CFR part 430, subpart
B, appendix N, Uniform Test Method for
Measuring the Energy Consumption of
Furnaces and Boilers. DOE established
its test procedures for furnaces and
boilers in a final rule published in the
Federal Register on May 12, 1997. 62
FR 26140. This procedure establishes a
means for determining annual energy
efficiency (AFUE) and annual energy
consumption of gas-fired, oil-fired, and
electric furnaces and boilers.
In addition to the test procedure
review provision discussed above, EISA
2007 also amended EPCA to require
DOE to amend its test procedures for all
covered products to include
measurement of standby mode and off
mode energy consumption. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(2)(A)) Consequently, DOE
amended its test procedures for
residential furnaces and boilers to
include provisions for measuring the
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption of those products. DOE
published a final rule in the Federal
Register on October 20, 2010, which
updated the DOE test procedures for
residential furnaces and boilers to
address the standby mode and off mode
test procedure requirements under
EPCA. 75 FR 64621. Since that time,
DOE published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NOPR) in the Federal
Register on September 13, 2011, which
calls for the use of the second edition of
International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC) Standard 62301,
‘‘Household Electrical Appliances—
Measurement of standby power,’’ in lieu
of the first edition incorporated by
reference in the earlier final rule, as well
as providing guidance on rounding and
sampling. 76 FR 56339. On December
31, 2012, DOE published in the Federal
Register its second test procedure final
rule for furnaces and boilers related to
standby mode and off mode, which
incorporated by reference IEC Standards
62301 (Second Edition) and provided
related rounding and sampling
guidance. However, that rulemaking
was limited to test procedure updates to
address the above-referenced standby
mode and off mode requirements, and
consequently, it has not considered
several other potential non-standby
mode/off mode issues in DOE’s existing
test procedures for residential furnaces
and boilers which DOE plans to address
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in this rulemaking. The potential issues
that DOE has preliminarily identified
and plans to address in this rulemaking
are discussed in detail below in section
II of this RFI.
In support of its test procedure
rulemaking, DOE conducts in-depth
technical analyses of publicly-available
test standards and other relevant
information. DOE continually seeks data
and public input to improve its testing
methodologies to more accurately reflect
consumer use and to produce repeatable
results. In general, DOE is requesting
comment and supporting data regarding
representative and repeatable methods
for measuring the energy use of
residential furnaces and boilers.
Additionally, DOE seeks comment and
information on the specific topics
below.
II. Discussion
A. Reducing Test Burden
DOE plans to identify available
opportunities to potentially reduce
testing burden by simplifying
appropriate parts of the residential
furnaces and boilers test procedure.
Knowledge of a unit’s physical
characteristics may make it possible to
reliably predict certain performance
parameters without conducting testing.
If so, replacing certain burdensome tests
with default factors could significantly
reduce the testing burden (time to
conduct a test or cost of testing) without
sacrificing the validity of the test
results. Of course, manufacturers would
retain the option to conduct actual
testing, rather than rely on default
values.
DOE plans to also reassess existing
default factors in the test procedure,
many of which were created years ago
and might no longer be relevant for
some of today’s product designs. For
example, the existing off-cycle draft
factor for flue gas flow (DF) default value
of 0.4 for induced draft products was
established for clamshell heat
exchangers intended for use in gravity
vented units. Today’s products are
designed with more restrictive heat
exchangers (tubes and small formed
sections) and are likely to result in draft
factors less than 0.4. Regarding default
factors, DOE requests input and
comments on:
(1) Defining default draft factors 3 for
each product with different physical
characteristics;
3 Identified default draft factors in DOE’s
residential furnaces and boilers test procedure
include the off-cycle draft factor for flue gas flow
(DF), the off-cycle draft factor for stack gas flow (DS),
the off-cycle draft factor for stack gas flow without
a stack damper (DSO), and the power burner draft
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(2) Defining default jacket loss 4
factors for each product type;
(3) The appropriateness of replacing
the ‘‘heat up’’ and ‘‘cool down’’ tests
with default seasonal factors to account
for the year-round performance of the
equipment. If so, should these factors be
based on physical characteristics of the
equipment being evaluated, and should
the use of default factors be optional or
mandatory? Also, DOE is requesting
data about the effect of the heat up and
cool down test result measurements on
AFUE calculation, the range and
repeatability of the test results, and the
degree to which such results are
correlated with physical attributes of the
tested product.
(4) Simplifying the calculation
procedure for determining the burner
cycling and draft losses used to compute
seasonal efficiency without losing
important insight about a product’s
relative energy performance; and
(5) Other default values that need
updating or parameters currently
measured that could be replaced with
default values.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
B. Test Conditions Impacting Energy
Efficiency (AFUE) Performance
DOE is interested in receiving
comments about improving the test
procedure’s effectiveness in quantifying
energy efficiency performance under
typical field conditions. DOE has
identified opportunities to reduce
variability, eliminate ambiguity, and
address discrepancies between the test
procedure and actual field conditions.
On this topic, DOE seeks input on the
following issues:
(1) The DOE test procedure
incorporates by reference the American
Society of Heating, Refrigerating and
Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
Standard 103–1993.5 In 2007, ASHRAE
published a revised version of Standard
103 (ASHRAE Standard 103–2007),
which was updated to reflect
improvements and changes in
equipment design that were not
adequately covered by the previous
factor (DP). DF is the ratio of gas mass flow rate
through the flue during the off-cycle to the gas mass
flow rate through the flue during the on-cycle at
identical temperatures. DP is the ratio of the rate of
flue gas mass flow through the furnace during the
off-period to the rate of flue gas mass flow through
the furnace during the on-period.
4 Identified default jacket loss factors in DOE’s
residential furnaces and boilers test procedure
include jacket loss factor (CJ) and jacket loss (LJ),
which measure the losses resulting from heat
escaping the furnace or boiler jacket.
5 American Society of Heating Refrigerating and
Air-Conditioning Engineers Inc., ASHRAE
Standard: Method of Testing for Annual Fuel
Utilization Efficiency of Residential Central
Furnaces and Boilers (1993) Report No. ANSI/
ASHRAE 103–1993.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
version of the standard. In particular,
attention was given to the modern
classes of two-stage and modulating
equipment that have come on the
market, as well as equipment whose
performance is affected by post purge of
the combustion chamber. Greater
understanding and clarity regarding
energy losses were also incorporated
into the updated ASHRAE standard.
Finally, changes in nomenclature and
definitions were included to clarify
meaning within the standard, a need
reflected by questions and issues posed
to ASHRAE committee members over
the past 10 years. Furthermore,
editorially, the errata from the previous
version were incorporated into this
version. DOE plans on updating its
references to the current ASHRAE
Standard 103–2007 6 and seeks
comments on which sections of
ASHRAE 103–2007 should be included
in the DOE test procedure.
(2) DOE plans to review the tolerance
ranges for measuring important
variables such as fuel calorific value,
weight of condensate, water flow and
temperature, voltage, and flue gas
composition. DOE seeks comment as to
whether the existing tolerance ranges for
measuring variables in the test
procedure are acceptable or whether
DOE should define different methods of
measuring and recording such variables.
(3) DOE plans to review the statistical
variability encountered during testing in
important variables such as firing rate,
heating media temperatures and flow
rates, and ambient air temperature. For
example, the firing rate is generally to
be set and held to within ±2% of the
nameplate rating. DOE seeks comment
regarding whether this range should be
narrowed.
(4) Room ambient air temperatures are
currently allowed to vary widely. Under
the DOE test procedure, the room
temperature is allowed to be between 65
°F and 100 °F, except for condensing
furnaces and boilers, where the room
temperature shall not exceed 85 °F. DOE
plans to review whether it is
appropriate to tighten the allowable
room air temperature range. DOE seeks
comment as to whether it should tighten
the allowable room air temperature
range.
(5) Currently, a minimum draft factor
of 0.05 can be applied to products with
restricted flueways without providing a
list of qualifications or instructions as to
how to verify that the units are designed
6 American Society of Heating Refrigerating and
Air-Conditioning Engineers Inc., ASHRAE
Standard: Method of Testing for Annual Fuel
Utilization Efficiency of Residential Central
Furnaces and Boilers (2007) Report No. ANSI/
ASHRAE 103–2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
677
with no measurable airflow through the
combustion chamber and heat
exchanger during the burner off-period.
DOE seeks comment as to whether and
under what conditions, a minimum
draft factor should be used for products
with restricted flueways and how the
conditions could be verified if questions
arose.
(6) DOE requires all non-weatherized
boilers to be rated as indoor equipment
(see 10 CFR part 430, subpart B,
appendix N, section 10.1). This implies
that direct vent boilers that would
normally meet the definition of System
9 or System 10 should instead be
defined as one of the other System
numbers.7 DOE plans to review whether
it is appropriate for direct vent boilers
to be calculated according to System 3
or alternatively according to System 9 or
10, but with jacket losses excluded (i.e.,
LJ=0). DOE seeks input regarding how
direct vent boilers should be tested.
(7) DOE plans to review the current
value of the oversize factor 8 (0.7) to
investigate whether current field
installations can be better
approximated, for both furnaces and
boilers. DOE seeks comment regarding
an appropriate value for the oversize
factor.
(8) Currently, the DOE test procedure
provides that water supply temperature
must be between 120 °F and 124 °F for
non-condensing hot water boilers and
120 °F (±2 °F) for condensing hot water
boilers. DOE plans to review the value
for the water supply temperature for
non-condensing and condensing boilers.
DOE seeks comment on the appropriate
water supply temperature for measuring
the performance of non-condensing and
condensing boilers. Should DOE change
the water temperatures for condensing
boilers to reflect the lower temperatures
encountered in low-temperature radiant
installations?
(9) The current DOE test procedure
does not specify that the tested
equipment is set up according to
7 System numbers are used in the ASHRAE 103
test procedure to categorize the different types of
furnaces and boilers to be tested. ‘‘System 9’’ or
‘‘System10’’ refer to furnaces or boilers that are
outdoor, direct vent, or isolated combustion
systems. ‘‘System 3’’ refers to furnaces or boilers
that can use indoor combustion air and have direct
exhaust.
8 ‘‘Oversize factor’’ accounts for the national
average oversizing of equipment that occurs when
a heating equipment is sized to satisfy more than
the heating load of the household. This is typically
done to size the equipment so that it is able to
satisfy the days in which the house heating
requirements might be exceeded and/or to take into
account uncertainties regarding house heating load.
For example, a 0.7 oversize factor is equivalent to
30-percent oversizing of the heating equipment (in
other words, 30 percent greater input capacity than
is required).
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
678
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(1) The boiler test procedure measures
only the power supplied to the power
burner motor, the ignition device, and
the circulating pump (see 10 CFR part
430, subpart B, appendix N, section
10.2.1). Some boilers are equipped with
an internal pump used to maintain a
minimum flow rate through the heat
exchanger that does not function as a
system circulating pump. DOE seeks
comment on whether the boiler average
annual auxiliary electrical energy
consumption (EAE) calculations should
include one system circulating pump
and an additional pump (if present) that
circulates water during the operation of
the burner.
(2) Modulating power burners are
often equipped with variable speed
motors. The efficiency of the motor/
blower combination changes with the
firing rate. The same may be true for
circulating pumps. Currently, DOE’s test
procedure assumes a fixed motor
efficiency. For equipment with
modulating power burners, using a fixed
motor efficiency would produce
inaccurate electricity consumption
estimates, since the motor efficiency
varies at the different firing rates. DOE
plans to incorporate a method for partload efficiency into its electricity
consumption calculations for
modulating equipment. DOE requests
input regarding the appropriateness of
incorporating a method for part-load
efficiency into its electricity
consumption calculations and input on
what method DOE should use.
(3) The current DOE test procedure
includes power consumed by the
ignition device, circulating pump, and
power burner motors, but it ignores
other devices that use power during the
active mode (e.g., gas valve and safety
and operating controls). DOE plans to
consider including any electrical power
consumption not already measured
during the active mode. DOE seeks
comment regarding how to address any
electrical power consumption not
already measured during the active
C. Test Conditions Impacting Non-AFUE mode.
Efficiency Parameters
(4) Historical energy use data show
that national average house heating
DOE plans to improve the ability of
loads have been changing because of
the test procedure to measure nonincreased household square footage,
AFUE energy efficiency parameters
improved building shell efficiency,
under typical field conditions.
changes in the distribution of where this
Regarding this topic, DOE seeks input
equipment is installed, and changes in
on:
average weather conditions. DOE plans
to review the parameters to calculate the
9 American National Standards Institute,
burner operating hours in section 10.2.1
American National Standard/CSA Standard for
of the DOE test procedure (i.e., national
Gas-Fired Low Pressure Steam and Hot Water
Boilers (2010) Report No. ANSI Z21.13–2010, CSA
average heating load hours and the
4.9–2010.
adjustment factor). DOE seeks comment
10 American National Standards Institute,
regarding what national average values
American National Standard/CSA Standard for
should be used to calculate burner
Gas-Fired Central Furnaces (2006) Report No. ANSI
Z21.47–2006, CSA 2.3–2006.
operating hours.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
recommended field settings as defined
in the product’s installation and
operation manual. This potentially
allows the unit to be tested under
conditions that are different from the
field or may not be recommended for
safety reasons. Examples of such test
conditions include a different flue CO2
percentage or reduced input rate from
the recommended field settings. DOE
plans to review the use of manufacturerrecommended values in testing, such as
the minimum firing rate for testing a
unit equipped with manually-adjustable
controls (see ASHRAE 103–2007,
section 8.4.1.1.2) and target flue gas CO2
levels. Should DOE change the test
procedure to specify that the tested
equipment is set up according to
recommended field settings as defined
in the product’s installation and
operation manual?
(10) AFUE ratings are typically
reported in manufacturer product
literature and on directories of certified
products to the nearest 0.1, but this is
neither specified in the DOE test
procedure nor explicitly required by the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
Instead, DOE’s test procedure specifies
that the AFUE rating should be rounded
to the nearest whole percentage point
(see 10 CFR 430.23(n)(2)). DOE plans to
specify the requisite number of
significant digits as part of this test
procedure rulemaking. DOE solicits
input on how much precision is
statistically possible.
(11) Vent stack requirements differ
between ANSI Z21.13 9 or ANSI
Z21.47 10 and the DOE test procedure.
DOE plans to review the difference in
efficiency rating attributable to the
differences in vent stack configuration
between the DOE test procedure and
ANSI Z21.13 or ANSI Z21.47. DOE
seeks comment on whether it should
consider adopting the same vent stack
requirements as set forth in ANSI
Z21.13 or ANSI Z21.47.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
D. Performance Test for Automatic
Means in Boilers
In 2008, DOE published a technical
amendment to the 2007 furnace and
boiler final rule (72 FR 65136 (Nov. 19,
2007)) to add a number of design
requirements set forth in EISA 2007. 73
FR 43611 (July 28, 2008). These
requirements prohibit constant-burning
pilot lights for gas-fired hot water
boilers and gas-fired steam boilers, and
require an automatic means for
adjusting the water temperature for gasfired hot water boilers, oil-fired hot
water boilers, and electric hot water
boilers. The automatic means for
adjusting water temperature must
automatically adjust the temperature of
the water supplied by the boiler to
ensure that an incremental change in
inferred heat load produces a
corresponding incremental change in
the temperature of water supplied.
While these requirements do not
impact the AFUE rating, DOE is
considering including in this test
procedure a performance test to
demonstrate that the ‘‘automatic means’’
functions as required. While this test
would not need to be performed by
manufacturers to certify compliance
with the existing design standards, DOE
would use this test to verify compliance
with the design standards should a
question of compliance arise. DOE
invites input on:
(1) Any principles or tests currently
used, or being considered for use, to
qualify the operation of the automatic
means.
(2) Required inputs and types of
technologies needed to project changes
in demand and the relationships
between these inputs/technologies and
supply temperature or pump/burner
operation.
(3) Suggestions about the
measurements that should be included
in the test.
E. Harmonization of Standards
DOE invites input on other national or
international test procedures commonly
used to rate residential furnace and
boiler energy efficiency, including the
advantages and disadvantages of those
test procedures compared to the current
DOE test procedure. In particular, DOE
seeks input on:
(1) Differences in efficiency
performance caused by differences in
minimum static pressure requirements
in ASHRAE 103–2007 11 (Table IV)
11 American Society of Heating Refrigerating and
Air-Conditioning Engineers Inc., ASHRAE
Standard: Method of Testing for Annual Fuel
Utilization Efficiency of Residential Central
Furnaces and Boilers (2007) Report No. ANSI/
ASHRAE 103–2007.
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
compared to DOE’s proposed furnace
fan test procedure,12 and drawbacks or
advantages associated with harmonizing
the requirements.
(2) Any other national or international
test procedures that could be considered
for this cycle of test procedure
amendments.
F. Alternative Methods for Furnace/
Boiler Efficiency Determination
DOE is aware of alternative methods
to measure the heating efficiency
(AFUE) of residential furnaces and
boilers. In particular, DOE seeks input
on:
(1) Procedure developed by
Brookhaven National Laboratory that
uses linear input/output, a relationship
between fuel input and heat output that
can be used to determine the efficiency
of residential boilers.13
(2) Any other methods that could be
considered for this test procedure
update.
G. Scope
A combination space-heating and
water-heating appliance is defined in
the applicable industry test standard as
a unit that is designed to provide space
heating and water heating from a single
primary energy source.14 The two major
types of combination appliances are: (1)
Boiler/tankless coil or boiler/indirect
tank combination units, whose primary
function is space heating, and (2) water
heater/fan-coil combination units,
whose primary function is domestic
water heating. Currently, there is no
DOE test procedure for determining the
combined efficiency of the combination
products that can be used to supply
domestic hot water in addition to its
space-heating function. However, there
are DOE test procedures for the
individual components (boiler or water
heater) of a combined appliance which
provides for testing and efficiency
ratings for the primary function—space
heating or domestic water heating.
DOE’s test procedure for residential
furnace and boilers, which is set forth
at 10 CFR 430.23(n) and 10 CFR part
430, subpart B, appendix N, addresses
central gas-fired, electric, and oil-fired
furnaces with inputs less than 225,000
Btu/h and gas-fired, electric, and oilfired boilers with inputs less than
300,000 Btu/h. DOE’s test procedure for
12 See
77 FR 28674 (May 15, 2012).
Thomas, Technical Note: Performance
of Combination Hydronic Systems, ASHRAE
Journal (December 2011).
14 American Society of Heating Refrigerating and
Air Conditioning Engineers, ANSI/ASHRAE 124–
2007: Methods of Testing for Rating Combination
Space-Heating and Water-Heating Appliances
(2007).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
13 Butcher,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
residential water heaters, which is set
forth at 10 CFR 430.23(e) and 10 CFR
part 430, subpart B, appendix E,
addresses gas-fired, electric, and oilfired storage-type water heaters with
storage greater than 20 gallons and gasfired and electric instantaneous-type
water heaters with storage volume less
than 2 gallons. ASHRAE has an existing
test procedure, ANSI/ASHRAE 124–
2007 (Methods of Testing for Rating
Combination Space-Heating and WaterHeating Appliances), which provides a
method of test to rate the performance
of a combination space-heating and
water-heating appliance.15 For this
rulemaking, DOE is considering an
expansion of the scope of the test
procedure to include definitions and
test methods for these types of
combination products. DOE seeks
comment on:
(1) What types of combination
equipment are there in this market?
(2) How should DOE address the
measurement of energy use by such
combined products (keeping in mind
the potential for active mode, standby
mode, and off mode operation)?
H. Standby Mode and Off Mode
On December 31, 2012, DOE
published a test procedure final rule in
the Federal Register for furnaces and
boilers related to standby mode and off
mode energy consumption. However,
given the broad scope of this 7-yearlookback test procedure rulemaking,
comments are also welcome on DOE’s
test procedure provisions for
determining standby mode and off mode
energy use.
679
of amended test procedures for
residential furnaces and boilers.
After the close of the comment period,
DOE will begin collecting data,
conducting the analyses, and reviewing
the public comments. These actions will
be taken to aid in the development of a
test procedure NOPR for residential
furnaces and boilers.
DOE considers public participation to
be a very important part of the process
for developing test procedures. DOE
actively encourages the participation
and interaction of the public during the
comment period at each stage of the
rulemaking process. Interactions with
and between members of the public
provide a balanced discussion of the
issues and assist DOE in the rulemaking
process. Anyone who wishes to be
added to the DOE mailing list to receive
future notices and information about
this rulemaking should contact Ms.
Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945, or
via email at
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
28, 2012.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
[FR Doc. 2012–31700 Filed 1–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Parts 2 and 380
I. Other Issues
[Docket No. RM12–11–000]
DOE seeks comments on other
relevant issues that would affect the test
procedures for residential furnaces and
boilers. Although DOE has attempted to
identify those portions of the test
procedure where it believes
amendments may be warranted,
interested parties are welcome to
provide comments on any aspect of the
test procedure, including updates of
referenced standards, as part of this
comprehensive 7-year-review process.
Revisions to the Auxiliary Installations,
Replacement Facilities, and Siting and
Maintenance Regulations
III. Public Participation
DOE invites all interested parties to
submit in writing by February 19, 2013,
comments and information on matters
addressed in this notice and on other
matters relevant to DOE’s consideration
15 American Society of Heating Refrigerating and
Air Conditioning Engineers, ANSI/ASHRAE 124–
2007: Methods of Testing for Rating Combination
Space-Heating and Water-Heating Appliances
(2007).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Natural Gas Act (NGA)
requires that prior to the construction or
extension of any natural gas facilities,
the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission) must issue a
certificate that authorizes a natural gas
company to undertake the proposed
activity. However, under the
Commission’s regulations, the
construction of auxiliary installations or
replacement facilities, while subject to
the Commission’s NGA jurisdiction, are
not treated as the construction or
extension of facilities, and thus do not
require certificate authorization. The
Commission proposes to revise its
regulations to clarify that all activities
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 675-679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31700]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket Number EERE-2012-BT-TP-0024]
RIN 1904-AC79
Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedure
for Residential Furnaces and Boilers
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is initiating a rulemaking
and data collection process to consider amendments to DOE's test
procedure for residential furnaces and boilers. Because DOE has
recently completed a test procedure rulemaking for the standby mode and
off mode energy consumption of these products, the primary focus of
this rulemaking will be on active mode operation. This rulemaking is
intended to fulfill DOE's statutory obligation to review its test
procedures for covered products at least once every seven years. To
inform interested parties and to facilitate the process, DOE has
gathered data and has identified several issues that might warrant
modifications to the currently applicable test procedures, including
topics on which DOE is particularly interested in receiving comment. In
overview, the issues outlined in this document mainly concern reducing
the test burden, test conditions impacting the annual fuel utilization
efficiency (AFUE) metric, test conditions impacting non-AFUE efficiency
parameters, the performance test for automatic means in boilers,
harmonization of standards, alternative methods for furnace/boiler
efficiency determination, and scope. These topics (and others which
commenters identify) are ones which DOE anticipates may lead to
proposed test procedure amendments in a subsequent notice of proposed
rulemaking (NOPR). DOE welcomes written comments from the public on any
subject related to the test procedures for residential furnaces and
boilers, including topics not specifically raised in this RFI.
DATES: Written comments and information are requested on or before
February 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments. Alternatively, interested
persons may submit comments, identified by docket number EERE-2011-BT-
TP-0024 and/or RIN 1904-AC79, by any of the following methods:
Email: Res-Furnaces-Boilers-2012-TP-0024@ee.doe.gov.
Include EERE-2012-BT-TP-0024 and/or RIN 1904-AC79 in the subject line
of the message. Submit electronic comments in WordPerfect, Microsoft
Word, PDF, or ASCII file format, and avoid the use of special
characters or any form of encryption.
Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585- 0121. Telephone: (202)
586-2945. If possible, please submit all items on a compact disc (CD),
in which case it is not necessary to include printed copies.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies Program, 6th Floor, 950 L'Enfant Plaza
SW., Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. If possible,
please submit all items on a CD, in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for this rulemaking. No telefacsimilies
(faxes) will be accepted. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see
section III of this document (Public Participation).
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
may be sent to Mr. Mohammed Khan, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program,
EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121.
Telephone: (202) 586-7892. Email: residential_furnaces_and_boilers@ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-71, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121. Telephone: (202) 586-9507. Email: Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
For information on how to submit or review public comments, contact
Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program, EE-2J,
1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone:
(202) 586-2945. Email: Brend.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
II. Discussion
A. Reducing Test Burden
B. Test Conditions Impacting Energy Efficiency (AFUE)
Performance
C. Test Conditions Impacting Non-AFUE Efficiency Parameters
D. Performance Test for Automatic Means in Boilers
E. Harmonization of Standards
F. Alternative Methods for Furnace/Boiler Efficiency
Determination
G. Scope
H. Standby Mode and Off Mode
I. Other Issues
III. Public Participation
I. Authority and Background
Title III, Part B,\1\ of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of
1975 (``EPCA'' or ``the Act''), Public Law 94-163 (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309,
as codified) sets forth a variety of provisions designed to improve
energy efficiency and establishes the Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles,\2\ including residential
furnaces and boilers. (42 U.S.C. 6291(1)-(2) and 6292(a)(5))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This part was originally titled Part B. It was redesignated
Part A in the United States Code for editorial reasons.
\2\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007,
Public Law 110-140 (Dec. 19, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 676]]
Under the Act, this program consists essentially of four parts: (1)
Testing; (2) labeling; (3) establishing Federal energy conservation
standards; and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. The
testing requirements consist of test procedures that manufacturers of
covered products must use as both the basis for certifying to DOE that
their products comply with applicable energy conservation standards
adopted pursuant to EPCA, and for making representations about the
efficiency of those products. (42 U.S.C. 6293(c); 42 U.S.C. 6295(s))
Similarly, DOE must use these test procedures to determine whether the
products comply with any relevant standards adopted under EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6295(s))
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth criteria and procedures that
DOE must follow when prescribing or amending test procedures for
covered products. EPCA provides, in relevant part, that any test
procedures prescribed or amended under this section must be reasonably
designed to produce test results which measure energy efficiency,
energy use, or estimated annual operating cost of a covered product
during a representative average use cycle or period of use, and must
not be unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
In addition, if DOE determines that a test procedure amendment is
warranted, it must publish proposed test procedures and offer the
public an opportunity to present oral and written comments on them. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(2)) Finally, in any rulemaking to amend a test
procedure, DOE must determine the extent to which the proposed test
procedure would alter the product's measured energy efficiency. (42
U.S.C. 6293(e)(1)) If DOE determines that the amended test procedure
would alter the measured efficiency of a covered product, DOE must
amend the applicable energy conservation standard accordingly. (42
U.S.C. 6293(e)(2))
Further, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA
2007) amended EPCA to require that at least once every 7 years, DOE
must review test procedures for all covered products and either amend
the test procedures (if the Secretary determines that amended test
procedures would more accurately or fully comply with the requirements
of 42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) or publish notice in the Federal Register of
any determination not to amend a test procedure. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(1)(A)) Under this requirement, DOE must review the test
procedures for the various types of residential furnace and boiler
products not later than December 19, 2014 (i.e., 7 years after the
enactment of EISA 2007). Thus, the final rule resulting from this
rulemaking will satisfy the requirement to review the test procedures
for furnaces and boilers within seven years of the enactment of EPCA.
DOE's test procedure for residential furnaces and boilers is found
at 10 CFR 430.23(n) and 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix N, Uniform
Test Method for Measuring the Energy Consumption of Furnaces and
Boilers. DOE established its test procedures for furnaces and boilers
in a final rule published in the Federal Register on May 12, 1997. 62
FR 26140. This procedure establishes a means for determining annual
energy efficiency (AFUE) and annual energy consumption of gas-fired,
oil-fired, and electric furnaces and boilers.
In addition to the test procedure review provision discussed above,
EISA 2007 also amended EPCA to require DOE to amend its test procedures
for all covered products to include measurement of standby mode and off
mode energy consumption. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) Consequently, DOE
amended its test procedures for residential furnaces and boilers to
include provisions for measuring the standby mode and off mode energy
consumption of those products. DOE published a final rule in the
Federal Register on October 20, 2010, which updated the DOE test
procedures for residential furnaces and boilers to address the standby
mode and off mode test procedure requirements under EPCA. 75 FR 64621.
Since that time, DOE published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR)
in the Federal Register on September 13, 2011, which calls for the use
of the second edition of International Electrotechnical Commission
(IEC) Standard 62301, ``Household Electrical Appliances--Measurement of
standby power,'' in lieu of the first edition incorporated by reference
in the earlier final rule, as well as providing guidance on rounding
and sampling. 76 FR 56339. On December 31, 2012, DOE published in the
Federal Register its second test procedure final rule for furnaces and
boilers related to standby mode and off mode, which incorporated by
reference IEC Standards 62301 (Second Edition) and provided related
rounding and sampling guidance. However, that rulemaking was limited to
test procedure updates to address the above-referenced standby mode and
off mode requirements, and consequently, it has not considered several
other potential non-standby mode/off mode issues in DOE's existing test
procedures for residential furnaces and boilers which DOE plans to
address in this rulemaking. The potential issues that DOE has
preliminarily identified and plans to address in this rulemaking are
discussed in detail below in section II of this RFI.
In support of its test procedure rulemaking, DOE conducts in-depth
technical analyses of publicly-available test standards and other
relevant information. DOE continually seeks data and public input to
improve its testing methodologies to more accurately reflect consumer
use and to produce repeatable results. In general, DOE is requesting
comment and supporting data regarding representative and repeatable
methods for measuring the energy use of residential furnaces and
boilers. Additionally, DOE seeks comment and information on the
specific topics below.
II. Discussion
A. Reducing Test Burden
DOE plans to identify available opportunities to potentially reduce
testing burden by simplifying appropriate parts of the residential
furnaces and boilers test procedure. Knowledge of a unit's physical
characteristics may make it possible to reliably predict certain
performance parameters without conducting testing. If so, replacing
certain burdensome tests with default factors could significantly
reduce the testing burden (time to conduct a test or cost of testing)
without sacrificing the validity of the test results. Of course,
manufacturers would retain the option to conduct actual testing, rather
than rely on default values.
DOE plans to also reassess existing default factors in the test
procedure, many of which were created years ago and might no longer be
relevant for some of today's product designs. For example, the existing
off-cycle draft factor for flue gas flow (DF) default value of 0.4 for
induced draft products was established for clamshell heat exchangers
intended for use in gravity vented units. Today's products are designed
with more restrictive heat exchangers (tubes and small formed sections)
and are likely to result in draft factors less than 0.4. Regarding
default factors, DOE requests input and comments on:
(1) Defining default draft factors \3\ for each product with
different physical characteristics;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Identified default draft factors in DOE's residential
furnaces and boilers test procedure include the off-cycle draft
factor for flue gas flow (DF), the off-cycle draft factor for stack
gas flow (DS), the off-cycle draft factor for stack gas flow without
a stack damper (DSO), and the power burner draft factor (DP). DF is
the ratio of gas mass flow rate through the flue during the off-
cycle to the gas mass flow rate through the flue during the on-cycle
at identical temperatures. DP is the ratio of the rate of flue gas
mass flow through the furnace during the off-period to the rate of
flue gas mass flow through the furnace during the on-period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 677]]
(2) Defining default jacket loss \4\ factors for each product type;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Identified default jacket loss factors in DOE's residential
furnaces and boilers test procedure include jacket loss factor
(CJ) and jacket loss (LJ), which measure the
losses resulting from heat escaping the furnace or boiler jacket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) The appropriateness of replacing the ``heat up'' and ``cool
down'' tests with default seasonal factors to account for the year-
round performance of the equipment. If so, should these factors be
based on physical characteristics of the equipment being evaluated, and
should the use of default factors be optional or mandatory? Also, DOE
is requesting data about the effect of the heat up and cool down test
result measurements on AFUE calculation, the range and repeatability of
the test results, and the degree to which such results are correlated
with physical attributes of the tested product.
(4) Simplifying the calculation procedure for determining the
burner cycling and draft losses used to compute seasonal efficiency
without losing important insight about a product's relative energy
performance; and
(5) Other default values that need updating or parameters currently
measured that could be replaced with default values.
B. Test Conditions Impacting Energy Efficiency (AFUE) Performance
DOE is interested in receiving comments about improving the test
procedure's effectiveness in quantifying energy efficiency performance
under typical field conditions. DOE has identified opportunities to
reduce variability, eliminate ambiguity, and address discrepancies
between the test procedure and actual field conditions. On this topic,
DOE seeks input on the following issues:
(1) The DOE test procedure incorporates by reference the American
Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers
(ASHRAE) Standard 103-1993.\5\ In 2007, ASHRAE published a revised
version of Standard 103 (ASHRAE Standard 103-2007), which was updated
to reflect improvements and changes in equipment design that were not
adequately covered by the previous version of the standard. In
particular, attention was given to the modern classes of two-stage and
modulating equipment that have come on the market, as well as equipment
whose performance is affected by post purge of the combustion chamber.
Greater understanding and clarity regarding energy losses were also
incorporated into the updated ASHRAE standard. Finally, changes in
nomenclature and definitions were included to clarify meaning within
the standard, a need reflected by questions and issues posed to ASHRAE
committee members over the past 10 years. Furthermore, editorially, the
errata from the previous version were incorporated into this version.
DOE plans on updating its references to the current ASHRAE Standard
103-2007 \6\ and seeks comments on which sections of ASHRAE 103-2007
should be included in the DOE test procedure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-
Conditioning Engineers Inc., ASHRAE Standard: Method of Testing for
Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency of Residential Central Furnaces
and Boilers (1993) Report No. ANSI/ASHRAE 103-1993.
\6\ American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-
Conditioning Engineers Inc., ASHRAE Standard: Method of Testing for
Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency of Residential Central Furnaces
and Boilers (2007) Report No. ANSI/ASHRAE 103-2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) DOE plans to review the tolerance ranges for measuring
important variables such as fuel calorific value, weight of condensate,
water flow and temperature, voltage, and flue gas composition. DOE
seeks comment as to whether the existing tolerance ranges for measuring
variables in the test procedure are acceptable or whether DOE should
define different methods of measuring and recording such variables.
(3) DOE plans to review the statistical variability encountered
during testing in important variables such as firing rate, heating
media temperatures and flow rates, and ambient air temperature. For
example, the firing rate is generally to be set and held to within
2% of the nameplate rating. DOE seeks comment regarding
whether this range should be narrowed.
(4) Room ambient air temperatures are currently allowed to vary
widely. Under the DOE test procedure, the room temperature is allowed
to be between 65 [deg]F and 100 [deg]F, except for condensing furnaces
and boilers, where the room temperature shall not exceed 85 [deg]F. DOE
plans to review whether it is appropriate to tighten the allowable room
air temperature range. DOE seeks comment as to whether it should
tighten the allowable room air temperature range.
(5) Currently, a minimum draft factor of 0.05 can be applied to
products with restricted flueways without providing a list of
qualifications or instructions as to how to verify that the units are
designed with no measurable airflow through the combustion chamber and
heat exchanger during the burner off-period. DOE seeks comment as to
whether and under what conditions, a minimum draft factor should be
used for products with restricted flueways and how the conditions could
be verified if questions arose.
(6) DOE requires all non-weatherized boilers to be rated as indoor
equipment (see 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix N, section 10.1).
This implies that direct vent boilers that would normally meet the
definition of System 9 or System 10 should instead be defined as one of
the other System numbers.\7\ DOE plans to review whether it is
appropriate for direct vent boilers to be calculated according to
System 3 or alternatively according to System 9 or 10, but with jacket
losses excluded (i.e., LJ=0). DOE seeks input regarding how direct vent
boilers should be tested.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ System numbers are used in the ASHRAE 103 test procedure to
categorize the different types of furnaces and boilers to be tested.
``System 9'' or ``System10'' refer to furnaces or boilers that are
outdoor, direct vent, or isolated combustion systems. ``System 3''
refers to furnaces or boilers that can use indoor combustion air and
have direct exhaust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(7) DOE plans to review the current value of the oversize factor
\8\ (0.7) to investigate whether current field installations can be
better approximated, for both furnaces and boilers. DOE seeks comment
regarding an appropriate value for the oversize factor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``Oversize factor'' accounts for the national average
oversizing of equipment that occurs when a heating equipment is
sized to satisfy more than the heating load of the household. This
is typically done to size the equipment so that it is able to
satisfy the days in which the house heating requirements might be
exceeded and/or to take into account uncertainties regarding house
heating load. For example, a 0.7 oversize factor is equivalent to
30-percent oversizing of the heating equipment (in other words, 30
percent greater input capacity than is required).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(8) Currently, the DOE test procedure provides that water supply
temperature must be between 120 [deg]F and 124 [deg]F for non-
condensing hot water boilers and 120 [deg]F (2 [deg]F) for
condensing hot water boilers. DOE plans to review the value for the
water supply temperature for non-condensing and condensing boilers. DOE
seeks comment on the appropriate water supply temperature for measuring
the performance of non-condensing and condensing boilers. Should DOE
change the water temperatures for condensing boilers to reflect the
lower temperatures encountered in low-temperature radiant
installations?
(9) The current DOE test procedure does not specify that the tested
equipment is set up according to
[[Page 678]]
recommended field settings as defined in the product's installation and
operation manual. This potentially allows the unit to be tested under
conditions that are different from the field or may not be recommended
for safety reasons. Examples of such test conditions include a
different flue CO2 percentage or reduced input rate from the
recommended field settings. DOE plans to review the use of
manufacturer-recommended values in testing, such as the minimum firing
rate for testing a unit equipped with manually-adjustable controls (see
ASHRAE 103-2007, section 8.4.1.1.2) and target flue gas CO2
levels. Should DOE change the test procedure to specify that the tested
equipment is set up according to recommended field settings as defined
in the product's installation and operation manual?
(10) AFUE ratings are typically reported in manufacturer product
literature and on directories of certified products to the nearest 0.1,
but this is neither specified in the DOE test procedure nor explicitly
required by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Instead, DOE's test
procedure specifies that the AFUE rating should be rounded to the
nearest whole percentage point (see 10 CFR 430.23(n)(2)). DOE plans to
specify the requisite number of significant digits as part of this test
procedure rulemaking. DOE solicits input on how much precision is
statistically possible.
(11) Vent stack requirements differ between ANSI Z21.13 \9\ or ANSI
Z21.47 \10\ and the DOE test procedure. DOE plans to review the
difference in efficiency rating attributable to the differences in vent
stack configuration between the DOE test procedure and ANSI Z21.13 or
ANSI Z21.47. DOE seeks comment on whether it should consider adopting
the same vent stack requirements as set forth in ANSI Z21.13 or ANSI
Z21.47.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ American National Standards Institute, American National
Standard/CSA Standard for Gas-Fired Low Pressure Steam and Hot Water
Boilers (2010) Report No. ANSI Z21.13-2010, CSA 4.9-2010.
\10\ American National Standards Institute, American National
Standard/CSA Standard for Gas-Fired Central Furnaces (2006) Report
No. ANSI Z21.47-2006, CSA 2.3-2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Test Conditions Impacting Non-AFUE Efficiency Parameters
DOE plans to improve the ability of the test procedure to measure
non-AFUE energy efficiency parameters under typical field conditions.
Regarding this topic, DOE seeks input on:
(1) The boiler test procedure measures only the power supplied to
the power burner motor, the ignition device, and the circulating pump
(see 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix N, section 10.2.1). Some
boilers are equipped with an internal pump used to maintain a minimum
flow rate through the heat exchanger that does not function as a system
circulating pump. DOE seeks comment on whether the boiler average
annual auxiliary electrical energy consumption (EAE) calculations
should include one system circulating pump and an additional pump (if
present) that circulates water during the operation of the burner.
(2) Modulating power burners are often equipped with variable speed
motors. The efficiency of the motor/blower combination changes with the
firing rate. The same may be true for circulating pumps. Currently,
DOE's test procedure assumes a fixed motor efficiency. For equipment
with modulating power burners, using a fixed motor efficiency would
produce inaccurate electricity consumption estimates, since the motor
efficiency varies at the different firing rates. DOE plans to
incorporate a method for part-load efficiency into its electricity
consumption calculations for modulating equipment. DOE requests input
regarding the appropriateness of incorporating a method for part-load
efficiency into its electricity consumption calculations and input on
what method DOE should use.
(3) The current DOE test procedure includes power consumed by the
ignition device, circulating pump, and power burner motors, but it
ignores other devices that use power during the active mode (e.g., gas
valve and safety and operating controls). DOE plans to consider
including any electrical power consumption not already measured during
the active mode. DOE seeks comment regarding how to address any
electrical power consumption not already measured during the active
mode.
(4) Historical energy use data show that national average house
heating loads have been changing because of increased household square
footage, improved building shell efficiency, changes in the
distribution of where this equipment is installed, and changes in
average weather conditions. DOE plans to review the parameters to
calculate the burner operating hours in section 10.2.1 of the DOE test
procedure (i.e., national average heating load hours and the adjustment
factor). DOE seeks comment regarding what national average values
should be used to calculate burner operating hours.
D. Performance Test for Automatic Means in Boilers
In 2008, DOE published a technical amendment to the 2007 furnace
and boiler final rule (72 FR 65136 (Nov. 19, 2007)) to add a number of
design requirements set forth in EISA 2007. 73 FR 43611 (July 28,
2008). These requirements prohibit constant-burning pilot lights for
gas-fired hot water boilers and gas-fired steam boilers, and require an
automatic means for adjusting the water temperature for gas-fired hot
water boilers, oil-fired hot water boilers, and electric hot water
boilers. The automatic means for adjusting water temperature must
automatically adjust the temperature of the water supplied by the
boiler to ensure that an incremental change in inferred heat load
produces a corresponding incremental change in the temperature of water
supplied.
While these requirements do not impact the AFUE rating, DOE is
considering including in this test procedure a performance test to
demonstrate that the ``automatic means'' functions as required. While
this test would not need to be performed by manufacturers to certify
compliance with the existing design standards, DOE would use this test
to verify compliance with the design standards should a question of
compliance arise. DOE invites input on:
(1) Any principles or tests currently used, or being considered for
use, to qualify the operation of the automatic means.
(2) Required inputs and types of technologies needed to project
changes in demand and the relationships between these inputs/
technologies and supply temperature or pump/burner operation.
(3) Suggestions about the measurements that should be included in
the test.
E. Harmonization of Standards
DOE invites input on other national or international test
procedures commonly used to rate residential furnace and boiler energy
efficiency, including the advantages and disadvantages of those test
procedures compared to the current DOE test procedure. In particular,
DOE seeks input on:
(1) Differences in efficiency performance caused by differences in
minimum static pressure requirements in ASHRAE 103-2007 \11\ (Table IV)
[[Page 679]]
compared to DOE's proposed furnace fan test procedure,\12\ and
drawbacks or advantages associated with harmonizing the requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-
Conditioning Engineers Inc., ASHRAE Standard: Method of Testing for
Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency of Residential Central Furnaces
and Boilers (2007) Report No. ANSI/ASHRAE 103-2007.
\12\ See 77 FR 28674 (May 15, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Any other national or international test procedures that could
be considered for this cycle of test procedure amendments.
F. Alternative Methods for Furnace/Boiler Efficiency Determination
DOE is aware of alternative methods to measure the heating
efficiency (AFUE) of residential furnaces and boilers. In particular,
DOE seeks input on:
(1) Procedure developed by Brookhaven National Laboratory that uses
linear input/output, a relationship between fuel input and heat output
that can be used to determine the efficiency of residential
boilers.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Butcher, Thomas, Technical Note: Performance of Combination
Hydronic Systems, ASHRAE Journal (December 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Any other methods that could be considered for this test
procedure update.
G. Scope
A combination space-heating and water-heating appliance is defined
in the applicable industry test standard as a unit that is designed to
provide space heating and water heating from a single primary energy
source.\14\ The two major types of combination appliances are: (1)
Boiler/tankless coil or boiler/indirect tank combination units, whose
primary function is space heating, and (2) water heater/fan-coil
combination units, whose primary function is domestic water heating.
Currently, there is no DOE test procedure for determining the combined
efficiency of the combination products that can be used to supply
domestic hot water in addition to its space-heating function. However,
there are DOE test procedures for the individual components (boiler or
water heater) of a combined appliance which provides for testing and
efficiency ratings for the primary function--space heating or domestic
water heating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air
Conditioning Engineers, ANSI/ASHRAE 124-2007: Methods of Testing for
Rating Combination Space-Heating and Water-Heating Appliances
(2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE's test procedure for residential furnace and boilers, which is
set forth at 10 CFR 430.23(n) and 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix
N, addresses central gas-fired, electric, and oil-fired furnaces with
inputs less than 225,000 Btu/h and gas-fired, electric, and oil-fired
boilers with inputs less than 300,000 Btu/h. DOE's test procedure for
residential water heaters, which is set forth at 10 CFR 430.23(e) and
10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix E, addresses gas-fired, electric,
and oil-fired storage-type water heaters with storage greater than 20
gallons and gas-fired and electric instantaneous-type water heaters
with storage volume less than 2 gallons. ASHRAE has an existing test
procedure, ANSI/ASHRAE 124-2007 (Methods of Testing for Rating
Combination Space-Heating and Water-Heating Appliances), which provides
a method of test to rate the performance of a combination space-heating
and water-heating appliance.\15\ For this rulemaking, DOE is
considering an expansion of the scope of the test procedure to include
definitions and test methods for these types of combination products.
DOE seeks comment on:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air
Conditioning Engineers, ANSI/ASHRAE 124-2007: Methods of Testing for
Rating Combination Space-Heating and Water-Heating Appliances
(2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) What types of combination equipment are there in this market?
(2) How should DOE address the measurement of energy use by such
combined products (keeping in mind the potential for active mode,
standby mode, and off mode operation)?
H. Standby Mode and Off Mode
On December 31, 2012, DOE published a test procedure final rule in
the Federal Register for furnaces and boilers related to standby mode
and off mode energy consumption. However, given the broad scope of this
7-year-lookback test procedure rulemaking, comments are also welcome on
DOE's test procedure provisions for determining standby mode and off
mode energy use.
I. Other Issues
DOE seeks comments on other relevant issues that would affect the
test procedures for residential furnaces and boilers. Although DOE has
attempted to identify those portions of the test procedure where it
believes amendments may be warranted, interested parties are welcome to
provide comments on any aspect of the test procedure, including updates
of referenced standards, as part of this comprehensive 7-year-review
process.
III. Public Participation
DOE invites all interested parties to submit in writing by February
19, 2013, comments and information on matters addressed in this notice
and on other matters relevant to DOE's consideration of amended test
procedures for residential furnaces and boilers.
After the close of the comment period, DOE will begin collecting
data, conducting the analyses, and reviewing the public comments. These
actions will be taken to aid in the development of a test procedure
NOPR for residential furnaces and boilers.
DOE considers public participation to be a very important part of
the process for developing test procedures. DOE actively encourages the
participation and interaction of the public during the comment period
at each stage of the rulemaking process. Interactions with and between
members of the public provide a balanced discussion of the issues and
assist DOE in the rulemaking process. Anyone who wishes to be added to
the DOE mailing list to receive future notices and information about
this rulemaking should contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202) 586-2945, or
via email at Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 28, 2012.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2012-31700 Filed 1-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P