Availability of Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Modification of the Bayonne Bridge Across the Kill Van Kull Between Bayonne, Hudson County, NJ and Staten Island, Richmond County, NY, 740-743 [2012-31650]
Download as PDF
740
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Place: InterContinental Mark Hopkins
Hotel, 999 California Street, San Francisco,
CA 94108.
Contact Person: Julius Cinque, MS,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5186,
MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
1252, cinquej@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Biobehavioral and
Behavioral Processes Integrated Review
Group; Biobehavioral Regulation, Learning
and Ethology Study Section.
Date: February 7–8, 2013.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Lorien Hotel & Spa, 1600 King
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Contact Person: Melissa Gerald, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3172,
MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 408–
9107, geraldmel@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; PAR–11–
216: Early Phase Clinical Trials in Imaging
and Image-Guided Interventions.
Date: February 7, 2013.
Time: 2:15 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Serrano Hotel, 405 Taylor Street,
San Francisco, CA 94102.
Contact Person: David L Williams, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5110,
MSC 7854, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301)435–
1174, williamsdl2@csr.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Surgical Sciences,
Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Integrated Review Group; Medical Imaging
Study Section.
Date: February 7–8, 2013.
Time: 7:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Serrano Hotel, 405 Taylor Street,
San Francisco, CA 94102.
Contact Person: Xiang-Ning Li, MD, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5112,
MSC 7854, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1744, lixiang@csr.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: December 31, 2012.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–31739 Filed 1–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Prospective Grant of Exclusive
License: The Development of Gene
Expression Signatures of Neoplasm
Responsiveness to mTOR and HDAC
Inhibitor Combination Therapy
National Institutes of Health,
Public Health Service, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This is notice, in accordance
with 35 U.S.C. 209(c)(1) and 37 CFR
404.7(a)(1)(i), that the National
Institutes of Health, Department of
Health and Human Services, is
contemplating the grant to Empire
Genomics LLC of an exclusive patent
license to practice the inventions
embodied in US Provisional Patent
Application 61/558,402 entitled, ‘‘Gene
Expression Signatures of Neoplasm
Responsiveness to Therapy’’ [HHS Ref.
E–013–2012/0–US–01], and all
continuing applications and foreign
counterparts. The patent rights in this
invention have been assigned to the
Government of the United States of
America.
The prospective exclusive license
territory may be worldwide, and the
field of use may be limited to:
SUMMARY:
the use of the licensed patent rights limited
to an FDA-cleared or an FDA-approved in
vitro diagnostic test kit for human use and
predictive of the therapeutic benefit of
combination therapy comprising an HDAC
inhibitor and an mTOR inhibitor in the
treatment of multiple myeloma, breast
cancer, melanoma, lymphoma, and prostate
cancer.
Only written comments or
applications for a license, or both,
which are received by the NIH Office of
Technology Transfer on or before
January 22, 2013 will be considered.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the
patent application, inquiries, comments,
and other materials relating to the
contemplated exclusive license should
be directed to: Patrick P. McCue, Ph.D.,
Licensing and Patenting Manager, Office
of Technology Transfer, National
Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive
Boulevard, Suite 325, Rockville, MD
20852–3804; Telephone: (301) 435–
5560; Facsimile: (301) 402–0220; Email:
mccuepat@mail.nih.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
invention concerns the discovery of
gene expression signatures indicative of
tumors that are sensitive to combination
therapy comprising mTOR and HDAC
inhibitors. Broadly applicable to several
cancer subtypes, the detection of such
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
signatures in a tumor could be used to
identify a patient as a potential
candidate for mTOR and HDAC
inhibitor combination therapy.
The prospective exclusive license will
be royalty bearing and will comply with
the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C.
209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective
exclusive license may be granted unless
the NIH receives, within fifteen (15)
days from the date of this published
notice, written evidence and argument
that establishes that the grant of the
license would not be consistent with the
requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37
CFR 404.7.
Applications for a license in the field
of use filed in response to this notice
will be treated as objections to the grant
of the contemplated exclusive license.
Comments and objections submitted to
this notice will not be made available
for public inspection and, to the extent
permitted by law, will not be released
under the Freedom of Information Act,
5 U.S.C. 552.
Dated: December 31, 2012.
Richard U. Rodriguez,
Director, Division of Technology Development
& Transfer, Office of Technology Transfer,
National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2012–31743 Filed 1–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–USCG–2012–1091]
Availability of Draft Environmental
Assessment for the Proposed
Modification of the Bayonne Bridge
Across the Kill Van Kull Between
Bayonne, Hudson County, NJ and
Staten Island, Richmond County, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of availability and
request for comments; notice of public
meetings.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard announces
the availability of a Draft Environmental
Assessment (Draft EA) and the dates and
locations of two public meetings on the
Draft EA, which considered the
reasonably foreseeable environmental
impacts and socio-economic impacts of
the proposed modification of the
historic Bayonne Bridge across the Kill
Van Kull between Bayonne, New Jersey
and Staten Island, New York. As a
structure over navigable waters of the
United States, the proposed bridge
modification would require a Coast
Guard Bridge Permit Amendment. We
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Notices
request your comments on the Draft EA.
Our publication of this notice begins a
45-day comment period and provides
information on how to participate in the
public comment process for the Draft
EA, which includes an opportunity to
submit oral or written comments at two
public meetings to consider an
application by the Port Authority of
New York & New Jersey (PANYNJ) for
Coast Guard approval of the
modification to the Bayonne Bridge
across the Kill Van Kull.
DATES: Written comments and related
material may be submitted to our online
docket via https://www.regulations.gov
on or before February 18, 2013, or must
reach the Docket Management Facility
by that date. The public meetings will
be held on February 5, 2013, in
Bayonne, NJ, and February 7, 2013 in
Staten Island, NY (see the Background
and Purpose section below for more
details). If you wish to request an oral
or sign language interpreter, we must
receive your request for one by January
25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–1091 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
We have provided a copy of the Draft
EA in our online docket at https://
www.regulations.gov. Also, the Coast
Guard First District Bridge Office at 1
South Street Bldg 1, New York, NY
10004–1466 will maintain a printed
copy of the Draft EA for public review.
The document will be available for
inspection at this location between 8
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
document will also be available for
inspection in the locations shown in the
section below titled ‘‘Viewing the
comments and the Draft EA.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
If
you have questions on this notice or the
public meetings, call or email
Christopher Bisignano, Bridge
Management Specialist, First Coast
Guard District, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 212–668–7165, email
Christopher.J.Bisignano@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
Authority: The Draft Environmental
Assessment has been prepared in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42
United States Code (U.S.C.) 4321 et.
seq.); Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) Regulations for Implementing
NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) parts 1500–1508) and associated
CEQ guidelines; Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, Environmental
Planning Program; and United States
Coast Guard (USCG) Commandant
Instruction (COMDTINST) M16475.1D,
National Environmental Policy Act
Implementing Procedures and Policy for
Considering Environmental Impacts.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to submit
comments and related material on the
Draft EA. All comments received,
including comments received at the
public meeting, will be posted, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov
and will include any personal
information you have provided.
Submitting comments: If you submit a
comment, please include the docket
number for this notice (USCG–2012–
1091) and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, insert
(USCG–2012–1091) in the Search box,
look for this notice in the docket and
click the Comment button next to it. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
741
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period.
Viewing the comments and the Draft
EA: To view the comments and Draft EA
go to https://www.regulations.gov, insert
(USCG–2012–1091) in the Search box,
then click on the ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’
option. If you do not have access to the
Internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility. The
Draft EA is also available online at
https://www.uscg.mil/d1/prevention/
Bridges.asp, www.dhs.gov/nepa, and
https://www.panynj.gov/bayonnebridge/,
and is available 10 a.m.–3 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except federal holidays
and as noted below), for inspection at
the following locations:
1. U.S. Coast Guard Battery Bldg, 1
South Street, Building 1, New York,
NY 10004
2. U.S. Coast Guard Sector New York,
212 Coast Guard Drive, Staten
Island, NY 10305
3. Bayonne City Hall, 630 Avenue C,
Bayonne, NJ 07002
4. Staten Island Borough Hall, 10
Richmond Terrace, Room 100,
Staten Island, NY 10301
5. Bayonne Public Library, 630 Avenue
C, Bayonne, NJ 07002 (Also
available from 12 p.m.–5 p.m. on
Saturdays)
6. Port Richmond—NY Public Library,
75 Bennett Street, Staten Island, NY
10302 (Also available 12 p.m.–5
p.m. on Thursdays and Saturdays)
7. Ironbound Community Corp, 317 Elm
Street, Newark, NJ 07105
8. New York Assembly District 61, 853
Forest Avenue, Staten Island, NY
10301
9. New Jersey Legislative District 31,
447 Broadway, Bayonne, NJ 07002
10. New York City Council District 49,
130 Stuyvesant Place, Staten Island,
NY 10301
11. Staten Island Community Board 1, 1
Edgewater Plaza, Room 217, Staten
Island, NY 10305
Copies of all written communications
from the public meetings will be
available for review by interested
persons on the online docket, USCG–
2012–1091 via https://
www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
742
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Transcripts of the meetings will be
available for public review
approximately 30 days after the
meetings. All comments will be made
part of the official case record.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of comments received
into any of our dockets by the name of
the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business,
labor union, etc.). You may review a
Privacy Act, system of records notice
regarding our public dockets in the
January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal
Register (73 FR 3316).
Background and Purpose
Port Authority of New York and New
Jersey (PANYNJ) has proposed to
modify the Bayonne Bridge across
navigable waters of the United States by
raising the roadway thereby increasing
the vertical navigational clearance from
approximately 151 feet to 215 feet at
Mean High Water. A thorough
description of the project and how it
would be completed can be found at the
project’s Web site: https://
www.panynj.gov/bayonnebridge/.
The proposed bridge modification
project has been identified as a
significant project under ‘‘Implementing
Executive Order 13604 on Improving
Performance of Federal Permitting and
Review of Infrastructure Projects: A
Federal Plan for Modernizing the
Federal Permitting and Review Process
for Better Projects, Improved
Environmental and Community
Outcomes, and Quicker Decisions,’’
dated June 2012, which requires
agencies to identify and expedite the
permitting and environmental review
process for regionally or nationally
significant infrastructure projects. The
existing Bayonne Bridge has a vertical
navigational clearance of approximately
151 feet above the Kill Van Kull at Mean
High Water. The applicant proposes to
increase the vertical navigational
clearance to approximately 215 feet
above the waterway at Mean High Water
to provide greater clearances to
accommodate larger, Post-Panamax
vessels and thereby ensure the longterm viability of the Port of New York
and New Jersey. Post-Panamax vessels
are wider and taller ships with deeper
drafts that will be able to traverse
through the Panama Canal once
improvements on the canal are
completed in 2014. The expanded
purpose of the project is to improve the
substandard features and seismic
stability of the existing bridge and
ensure it conforms to modern highway
and structural design standards. In
addition, the existing bridge is eligible
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places. Therefore, the Coast
Guard has initiated consultation under
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act. The Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation has accepted
the Coast Guard invitation to participate
in the Section 106 process.
The Coast Guard issued the NEPA
Workplan, dated September 2011,
which provided a discussion of the
project’s Purpose and Need, project
alternatives and the framework of the
environmental analysis. On October 31,
2011, the Coast Guard held a
coordination meeting with city, state
and federal agencies to discuss the
project’s scope and the NEPA Workplan.
On November 14, 2011, the Coast Guard
issued a solicitation requesting
comments from the general public for
the scope of the project and the NEPA
Workplan. Comments received
following the meeting and during the
solicitation comment period included
concerns from the U.S. Federal Highway
Administration, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, various private
organizations and individuals, and
others regarding additional cargo
volumes due to larger ships entering the
Port of New York and New Jersey, the
expansion of the port and port facilities,
and the related impacts to air quality
and traffic. In response to these
comments, an Induced Demand
Analysis was conducted by an
independent source to study the impact
of the proposed action to those
communities surrounding the Port of
New York and New Jersey. Further
information regarding this analysis can
be found in Chapter 18 of the Draft EA
and in Appendix I. In addition, the
Coast Guard met with representatives
from minority and low income
communities in Staten Island, NY and
Newark, NJ to explain the Coast Guard
bridge permit process and to ensure
those communities have a voice in the
public comment process. Based on the
information received to date, the Coast
Guard has determined that a Draft
Environmental Assessment is the most
appropriate level of environmental
documentation for this project. Should
the Coast Guard determine that there are
no significant impacts following the
comment period; a Finding of No
Significant Impact would be issued. Per
NEPA procedures, should significant
impacts be discovered during the review
process, the level of environmental
documentation may be elevated to an
Environmental Impact Statement. The
Draft EA and appendices, Coast Guard
NEPA Workplan dated September 2011,
‘‘Bayonne Bridge Navigational
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Clearance Program Responses to
Scoping Comments NEPA Workplan,’’
dated February 2012, are available
online at https://www.uscg.mil/d1/
prevention/Bridges.asp.
Alternatives for the proposed project
considered include: (1) Taking no
action; (2) various build alternatives that
satisfy the purpose and need; (3) a
tunnel; (4) new cargo terminals
constructed downstream of the Bayonne
Bridge; and (5) a ferry service in lieu of
the bridge. Build alternatives included
raising the roadway within the existing
superstructure (preferred), jacking the
arch superstructure, converting to a lift
bridge, or constructing a new bridge.
As a structure over navigable waters
of the United States, it requires a Coast
Guard Bridge Permit Amendment
pursuant to the Bridge Act of March 23,
1906, as amended, Title 33 U.S.C. 491.
Additionally, the bridge permit
amendment would be the major federal
action in this undertaking since federal
funds will not be used, and therefore the
Department of Homeland Security,
through the Coast Guard is the federal
lead agency for review of potential
effects on the human environment,
including historic properties, pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), as
amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.).
The Coast Guard, with assistance from
PANYNJ, has prepared a Draft EA in
accordance with NEPA. See ‘‘Viewing
the comments and Draft EA’’ above. The
Draft EA identifies and examines the
reasonable alternatives (including ‘‘No
Build’’) and assesses the potential for
impact to the human environment,
including historic properties, of the
alternative proposals.
We are seeking public input on the
Draft EA, including comments on
completeness and adequacy of the
document, and on other environmental
and historic preservation concerns that
may be related to the proposed bridge
modification project. This includes
suggesting analyses and methodologies
for use in the Draft EA or possible
sources of data or information not
included in the Draft EA. Your
comments will be considered while
making the decision to prepare a final
Environmental Assessment, or elevate
the document to an Environmental
Impact Statement.
The Coast Guard will hold two public
meetings on the Draft EA, one in
Bayonne, NJ and one in Staten Island,
NY, to provide an opportunity for oral
comments. The specific times and
locations are as follows:
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
1. The first public meeting will be
held on Tuesday, February 5, 2013, from
4 p.m.–9 p.m. at Bayonne High School
Auditorium, 669 Avenue A (30th Street
and Avenue A Entrance), Bayonne, NJ
07002.
2. The second public meeting will be
held on Thursday, February 7, 2013,
from 4 p.m.–9 p.m. at Snug Harbor
Cultural Center Great Hall, 1000
Richmond Terrace, Building P, 2nd
Floor, Staten Island, NY 10301.
The Coast Guard and PANYNJ will
make brief presentations at 4 p.m. and
7 p.m. at each meeting to accommodate
the differing schedules of those wishing
to attend. The purpose of these meetings
is to consider an application by the
PANYNJ for Coast Guard approval of the
modification to the historic Bayonne
Bridge across the Kill Van Kull, mile
1.5, between Bayonne, NJ and Staten
Island, NY. All interested parties may
present data, views, and comments,
orally or in writing, concerning the
impact of the proposed bridge project on
navigation and the human environment.
The public meetings will be informal.
A representative of the Coast Guard will
preside, make a brief opening statement
and announce the procedure to be
followed at the meetings. Attendees
who request an opportunity to present
oral comments at a public meeting must
sign up to speak at the meeting site at
the designated time of the meeting.
Speakers will be called in the order of
receipt of the request. Attendees at the
meetings, who wish to present
testimony, and have not previously
made a request to do so, will follow
those having submitted a request, as
time permits. All oral presentations will
be limited to three minutes. The public
meetings may end early if all present
wishing to speak have done so. Any oral
comments provided at the meetings will
be transcribed and placed into the
docket by the Coast Guard. Written
comments and related material may also
be submitted to Coast Guard personnel
specified at that meeting for placement
into the docket by the Coast Guard.
Information on Service for Individuals
With Disabilities
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
public meeting, contact Christopher
Bisignano, Bridge Management
Specialist, First Coast Guard District,
U.S. Coast Guard; at the telephone
number or email address indicated
under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this notice. Any
requests for an oral or sign language
interpreter must be received by January
25, 2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Jan 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
This notice is issued under the
authority of 5 U.S.C.552(a).
Additionally, the draft EA has been
prepared in accordance with the Bridge
Act of March 23, 1906, as amended,
Title 33 U.S.C. 491 and the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
Regulations for Implementing NEPA (40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts
1500–1508) and associated CEQ
guidelines; Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 5100.1,
Environmental Planning Program; and
United States Coast Guard (USCG)
Commandant Instruction (COMDTINST)
M16475.1D, National Environmental
Policy Act Implementing Procedures
and Policy for Considering
Environmental Impacts.
Dated: December 27, 2012.
Brian L. Dunn,
Administrator, Office of Bridge Programs,
U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2012–31650 Filed 1–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Docket ID FEMA–2012–0003; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1280]
Changes in Flood Hazard
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice lists communities
where the addition or modification of
Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood
depths, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundaries or zone
designations, or the regulatory floodway
(hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting
Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports,
prepared by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) for each
community, is appropriate because of
new scientific or technical data. The
FIRM, and where applicable, portions of
the FIS report, have been revised to
reflect these flood hazard
determinations through issuance of a
Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in
accordance with Title 44, Part 65 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR
part 65). The LOMR will be used by
insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
743
rates for new buildings and the contents
of those buildings. For rating purposes,
the currently effective community
number is shown in the table below and
must be used for all new policies and
renewals.
These flood hazard
determinations will become effective on
the dates listed in the table below and
revise the FIRM panels and FIS report
in effect prior to this determination for
the listed communities.
From the date of the second
publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local
circulation, any person has ninety (90)
days in which to request through the
community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Mitigation reconsider
the changes. The flood hazard
determination information may be
changed during the 90-day period.
ADDRESSES: The affected communities
are listed in the table below. Revised
flood hazard information for each
community is available for inspection at
both the online location and the
respective community map repository
address listed in the table below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM
and FIS report for each community are
accessible online through the FEMA
Map Service Center at
www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
Submit comments and/or appeals to
the Chief Executive Officer of the
community as listed in the table below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email)
Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov; or visit
the FEMA Map Information eXchange
(FMIX) online at
www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/
fmx_main.html.
DATES:
The
specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in
this notice. However, the online
location and local community map
repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is
available for inspection is provided.
Any request for reconsideration of
flood hazard determinations must be
submitted to the Chief Executive Officer
of the community as listed in the table
below.
The modifications are made pursuant
to section 201 of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105,
and are in accordance with the National
Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C.
4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 740-743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31650]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG-USCG-2012-1091]
Availability of Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed
Modification of the Bayonne Bridge Across the Kill Van Kull Between
Bayonne, Hudson County, NJ and Staten Island, Richmond County, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments; notice of
public meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces the availability of a Draft
Environmental Assessment (Draft EA) and the dates and locations of two
public meetings on the Draft EA, which considered the reasonably
foreseeable environmental impacts and socio-economic impacts of the
proposed modification of the historic Bayonne Bridge across the Kill
Van Kull between Bayonne, New Jersey and Staten Island, New York. As a
structure over navigable waters of the United States, the proposed
bridge modification would require a Coast Guard Bridge Permit
Amendment. We
[[Page 741]]
request your comments on the Draft EA. Our publication of this notice
begins a 45-day comment period and provides information on how to
participate in the public comment process for the Draft EA, which
includes an opportunity to submit oral or written comments at two
public meetings to consider an application by the Port Authority of New
York & New Jersey (PANYNJ) for Coast Guard approval of the modification
to the Bayonne Bridge across the Kill Van Kull.
DATES: Written comments and related material may be submitted to our
online docket via https://www.regulations.gov on or before February 18,
2013, or must reach the Docket Management Facility by that date. The
public meetings will be held on February 5, 2013, in Bayonne, NJ, and
February 7, 2013 in Staten Island, NY (see the Background and Purpose
section below for more details). If you wish to request an oral or sign
language interpreter, we must receive your request for one by January
25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-1091 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
We have provided a copy of the Draft EA in our online docket at
https://www.regulations.gov. Also, the Coast Guard First District Bridge
Office at 1 South Street Bldg 1, New York, NY 10004-1466 will maintain
a printed copy of the Draft EA for public review. The document will be
available for inspection at this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The document will also
be available for inspection in the locations shown in the section below
titled ``Viewing the comments and the Draft EA.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice
or the public meetings, call or email Christopher Bisignano, Bridge
Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 212-668-7165, email Christopher.J.Bisignano@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.
Authority: The Draft Environmental Assessment has been prepared in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 United
States Code (U.S.C.) 4321 et. seq.); Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) Regulations for Implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) parts 1500-1508) and associated CEQ guidelines; Department of
Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, Environmental Planning
Program; and United States Coast Guard (USCG) Commandant Instruction
(COMDTINST) M16475.1D, National Environmental Policy Act Implementing
Procedures and Policy for Considering Environmental Impacts.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to submit comments and related material on the
Draft EA. All comments received, including comments received at the
public meeting, will be posted, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this notice (USCG-2012-1091) and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
insert (USCG-2012-1091) in the Search box, look for this notice in the
docket and click the Comment button next to it. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit them by mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period.
Viewing the comments and the Draft EA: To view the comments and
Draft EA go to https://www.regulations.gov, insert (USCG-2012-1091) in
the Search box, then click on the ``Open Docket Folder'' option. If you
do not have access to the Internet, you may view the docket online by
visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement
with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management
Facility. The Draft EA is also available online at https://www.uscg.mil/d1/prevention/Bridges.asp, www.dhs.gov/nepa, and https://www.panynj.gov/bayonnebridge/, and is available 10 a.m.-3 p.m., Monday through Friday
(except federal holidays and as noted below), for inspection at the
following locations:
1. U.S. Coast Guard Battery Bldg, 1 South Street, Building 1, New York,
NY 10004
2. U.S. Coast Guard Sector New York, 212 Coast Guard Drive, Staten
Island, NY 10305
3. Bayonne City Hall, 630 Avenue C, Bayonne, NJ 07002
4. Staten Island Borough Hall, 10 Richmond Terrace, Room 100, Staten
Island, NY 10301
5. Bayonne Public Library, 630 Avenue C, Bayonne, NJ 07002 (Also
available from 12 p.m.-5 p.m. on Saturdays)
6. Port Richmond--NY Public Library, 75 Bennett Street, Staten Island,
NY 10302 (Also available 12 p.m.-5 p.m. on Thursdays and Saturdays)
7. Ironbound Community Corp, 317 Elm Street, Newark, NJ 07105
8. New York Assembly District 61, 853 Forest Avenue, Staten Island, NY
10301
9. New Jersey Legislative District 31, 447 Broadway, Bayonne, NJ 07002
10. New York City Council District 49, 130 Stuyvesant Place, Staten
Island, NY 10301
11. Staten Island Community Board 1, 1 Edgewater Plaza, Room 217,
Staten Island, NY 10305
Copies of all written communications from the public meetings will
be available for review by interested persons on the online docket,
USCG-2012-1091 via https://www.regulations.gov.
[[Page 742]]
Transcripts of the meetings will be available for public review
approximately 30 days after the meetings. All comments will be made
part of the official case record.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a
Privacy Act, system of records notice regarding our public dockets in
the January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Background and Purpose
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) has proposed to
modify the Bayonne Bridge across navigable waters of the United States
by raising the roadway thereby increasing the vertical navigational
clearance from approximately 151 feet to 215 feet at Mean High Water. A
thorough description of the project and how it would be completed can
be found at the project's Web site: https://www.panynj.gov/bayonnebridge/.
The proposed bridge modification project has been identified as a
significant project under ``Implementing Executive Order 13604 on
Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of
Infrastructure Projects: A Federal Plan for Modernizing the Federal
Permitting and Review Process for Better Projects, Improved
Environmental and Community Outcomes, and Quicker Decisions,'' dated
June 2012, which requires agencies to identify and expedite the
permitting and environmental review process for regionally or
nationally significant infrastructure projects. The existing Bayonne
Bridge has a vertical navigational clearance of approximately 151 feet
above the Kill Van Kull at Mean High Water. The applicant proposes to
increase the vertical navigational clearance to approximately 215 feet
above the waterway at Mean High Water to provide greater clearances to
accommodate larger, Post-Panamax vessels and thereby ensure the long-
term viability of the Port of New York and New Jersey. Post-Panamax
vessels are wider and taller ships with deeper drafts that will be able
to traverse through the Panama Canal once improvements on the canal are
completed in 2014. The expanded purpose of the project is to improve
the substandard features and seismic stability of the existing bridge
and ensure it conforms to modern highway and structural design
standards. In addition, the existing bridge is eligible for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places. Therefore, the Coast Guard
has initiated consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has
accepted the Coast Guard invitation to participate in the Section 106
process.
The Coast Guard issued the NEPA Workplan, dated September 2011,
which provided a discussion of the project's Purpose and Need, project
alternatives and the framework of the environmental analysis. On
October 31, 2011, the Coast Guard held a coordination meeting with
city, state and federal agencies to discuss the project's scope and the
NEPA Workplan. On November 14, 2011, the Coast Guard issued a
solicitation requesting comments from the general public for the scope
of the project and the NEPA Workplan. Comments received following the
meeting and during the solicitation comment period included concerns
from the U.S. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, various private organizations and individuals, and
others regarding additional cargo volumes due to larger ships entering
the Port of New York and New Jersey, the expansion of the port and port
facilities, and the related impacts to air quality and traffic. In
response to these comments, an Induced Demand Analysis was conducted by
an independent source to study the impact of the proposed action to
those communities surrounding the Port of New York and New Jersey.
Further information regarding this analysis can be found in Chapter 18
of the Draft EA and in Appendix I. In addition, the Coast Guard met
with representatives from minority and low income communities in Staten
Island, NY and Newark, NJ to explain the Coast Guard bridge permit
process and to ensure those communities have a voice in the public
comment process. Based on the information received to date, the Coast
Guard has determined that a Draft Environmental Assessment is the most
appropriate level of environmental documentation for this project.
Should the Coast Guard determine that there are no significant impacts
following the comment period; a Finding of No Significant Impact would
be issued. Per NEPA procedures, should significant impacts be
discovered during the review process, the level of environmental
documentation may be elevated to an Environmental Impact Statement. The
Draft EA and appendices, Coast Guard NEPA Workplan dated September
2011, ``Bayonne Bridge Navigational Clearance Program Responses to
Scoping Comments NEPA Workplan,'' dated February 2012, are available
online at https://www.uscg.mil/d1/prevention/Bridges.asp.
Alternatives for the proposed project considered include: (1)
Taking no action; (2) various build alternatives that satisfy the
purpose and need; (3) a tunnel; (4) new cargo terminals constructed
downstream of the Bayonne Bridge; and (5) a ferry service in lieu of
the bridge. Build alternatives included raising the roadway within the
existing superstructure (preferred), jacking the arch superstructure,
converting to a lift bridge, or constructing a new bridge.
As a structure over navigable waters of the United States, it
requires a Coast Guard Bridge Permit Amendment pursuant to the Bridge
Act of March 23, 1906, as amended, Title 33 U.S.C. 491. Additionally,
the bridge permit amendment would be the major federal action in this
undertaking since federal funds will not be used, and therefore the
Department of Homeland Security, through the Coast Guard is the federal
lead agency for review of potential effects on the human environment,
including historic properties, pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et
seq.).
The Coast Guard, with assistance from PANYNJ, has prepared a Draft
EA in accordance with NEPA. See ``Viewing the comments and Draft EA''
above. The Draft EA identifies and examines the reasonable alternatives
(including ``No Build'') and assesses the potential for impact to the
human environment, including historic properties, of the alternative
proposals.
We are seeking public input on the Draft EA, including comments on
completeness and adequacy of the document, and on other environmental
and historic preservation concerns that may be related to the proposed
bridge modification project. This includes suggesting analyses and
methodologies for use in the Draft EA or possible sources of data or
information not included in the Draft EA. Your comments will be
considered while making the decision to prepare a final Environmental
Assessment, or elevate the document to an Environmental Impact
Statement.
The Coast Guard will hold two public meetings on the Draft EA, one
in Bayonne, NJ and one in Staten Island, NY, to provide an opportunity
for oral comments. The specific times and locations are as follows:
[[Page 743]]
1. The first public meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 5,
2013, from 4 p.m.-9 p.m. at Bayonne High School Auditorium, 669 Avenue
A (30th Street and Avenue A Entrance), Bayonne, NJ 07002.
2. The second public meeting will be held on Thursday, February 7,
2013, from 4 p.m.-9 p.m. at Snug Harbor Cultural Center Great Hall,
1000 Richmond Terrace, Building P, 2nd Floor, Staten Island, NY 10301.
The Coast Guard and PANYNJ will make brief presentations at 4 p.m. and
7 p.m. at each meeting to accommodate the differing schedules of those
wishing to attend. The purpose of these meetings is to consider an
application by the PANYNJ for Coast Guard approval of the modification
to the historic Bayonne Bridge across the Kill Van Kull, mile 1.5,
between Bayonne, NJ and Staten Island, NY. All interested parties may
present data, views, and comments, orally or in writing, concerning the
impact of the proposed bridge project on navigation and the human
environment.
The public meetings will be informal. A representative of the Coast
Guard will preside, make a brief opening statement and announce the
procedure to be followed at the meetings. Attendees who request an
opportunity to present oral comments at a public meeting must sign up
to speak at the meeting site at the designated time of the meeting.
Speakers will be called in the order of receipt of the request.
Attendees at the meetings, who wish to present testimony, and have not
previously made a request to do so, will follow those having submitted
a request, as time permits. All oral presentations will be limited to
three minutes. The public meetings may end early if all present wishing
to speak have done so. Any oral comments provided at the meetings will
be transcribed and placed into the docket by the Coast Guard. Written
comments and related material may also be submitted to Coast Guard
personnel specified at that meeting for placement into the docket by
the Coast Guard.
Information on Service for Individuals With Disabilities
For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meeting,
contact Christopher Bisignano, Bridge Management Specialist, First
Coast Guard District, U.S. Coast Guard; at the telephone number or
email address indicated under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice. Any requests for an oral or sign language
interpreter must be received by January 25, 2013.
This notice is issued under the authority of 5 U.S.C.552(a).
Additionally, the draft EA has been prepared in accordance with the
Bridge Act of March 23, 1906, as amended, Title 33 U.S.C. 491 and the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.);
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing
NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 1500-1508) and
associated CEQ guidelines; Department of Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, Environmental Planning Program; and United States
Coast Guard (USCG) Commandant Instruction (COMDTINST) M16475.1D,
National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures and Policy
for Considering Environmental Impacts.
Dated: December 27, 2012.
Brian L. Dunn,
Administrator, Office of Bridge Programs, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2012-31650 Filed 1-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P