Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products and Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Proposed Determination of Commercial and Industrial Compressors as Covered Equipment, 76972-76976 [2012-31393]
Download as PDF
76972
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Proposed Rules
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
Although DOE welcomes comments
on any aspect of this proposal, DOE is
particularly interested in receiving
comments and views of interested
parties concerning the following issues:
1. DOE’s assessment of the identified
special characteristics of R20 short
lamps and any other features that
should be considered special
characteristics;
2. The proposal that R20 short lamps
qualify for an exclusion from energy
conservation standards because of
insignificant energy savings attributable
to their design for specialty
applications;
3. Whether reduced wattage lamps
can be used as reasonable substitutes in
pool and spa applications in all
jurisdictions provided that they meet
the 0.5W of input power per square foot
of water surface area, or equivalent level
of illumination;
4. The identified specifications for
underwater illumination (0.5W of input
power per square foot of water surface
area, or equivalent level of illumination)
for building code compliance and
whether this requirement is appropriate
when qualifying a lamp as a reasonable
substitute; and
5. DOE’s analysis of potential R20
short lamp substitutes and the
conclusion that there are no reasonably
substitutable lamps for this lamp type.
VI. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
PART 430—ENERGY CONSERVATION
PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for part 430
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6309; 28 U.S.C.
2461 note.
2. In § 430.2, revise the definition for
‘‘Incandescent reflector lamp’’ and add
the definition for ‘‘R20 short lamp,’’ in
alphabetical order, to read as follows:
§ 430.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Incandescent reflector lamp
(commonly referred to as a reflector
lamp) means any lamp in which light is
produced by a filament heated to
incandescence by an electric current,
which: Contains an inner reflective
coating on the outer bulb to direct the
light; is not colored; is not designed for
rough or vibration service applications;
is not an R20 short lamp; has an R, PAR,
ER, BR, BPAR, or similar bulb shapes
with an E26 medium screw base; has a
rated voltage or voltage range that lies
at least partially in the range of 115 and
130 volts; has a diameter that exceeds
2.25 inches; and has a rated wattage that
is 40 watts or higher.
*
*
*
*
*
R20 short lamp means a lamp that is
an R20 incandescent reflector lamp that
has a rated wattage of 100 watts; has a
maximum overall length of 3 and 5⁄8, or
3.625, inches; and is designed, labeled,
and marketed specifically for pool and
spa applications.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–31396 Filed 12–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 430
RIN 1904–AC83
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential Business
Information, Energy conservation,
Household appliances, Imports,
Intergovernmental relations, Small
businesses.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of today’s proposed
rulemaking.
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products and Certain
Commercial and Industrial Equipment:
Proposed Determination of
Commercial and Industrial
Compressors as Covered Equipment
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
21, 2012.
David T. Danielson,
Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
20:33 Dec 28, 2012
Jkt 229001
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Proposed determination of
coverage.
AGENCY:
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, DOE proposes to amend part
430 of chapter II, subchapter D, of title
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
as set forth below:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
[Docket No. EERE–2012–BT–DET–0033]
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) proposes to determine
that commercial and industrial
compressors meet the criteria for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
covered equipment under Part A–1 of
Title III of the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (EPCA), as amended.
DOE proposes that classifying
equipment of such type as covered
equipment is necessary to carry out the
purpose of Part A–1 of EPCA, which is
to improve the efficiency of electric
motors and pumps and certain other
industrial equipment to conserve the
energy resources of the nation.
DATES: DOE will accept written
comments, data, and information on this
notice, but no later than January 30,
2013.
Interested persons may
submit comments, identified by docket
number EERE–2012–BT–DET–0033 or
RIN 1904–AC83, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: CompressorsDetermination
2012DET0033@ee.doe.gov. Include
EERE–2012–BT–DET–0033 and/or RIN
1904–AC83 in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
Notice of Proposed Determination for
Compressors, EERE–2012–BT–DET–
0033 and/or RIN 1904–AC83, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. Phone:
(202) 586–2945. Please submit one
signed paper original.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, Suite
600, 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW.,
Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202)
586–2945. Please submit one signed
paper original.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this
rulemaking.
Docket: The docket is available for
review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices,
comments, and other supporting
documents/materials. All documents in
the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. However,
not all documents listed in the index
may be publicly available, such as
information that is exempt from public
disclosure.
A link to the docket web page can be
found at: www.regulations.gov docket
no. EERE–2012–BT–DET–0033. This
web page contains a link to the docket
for this notice on the
www.regulations.gov site. The
regulations.gov web page contains
instructions on how to access all
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Proposed Rules
documents, including public comments,
in the docket. See section VII for further
information on how to submit
comments through
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
James Raba, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies, EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121,
Telephone: (202) 586–8654. Email:
Jim.Raba@ee.doe.gov.
In the Office of General Counsel,
contact Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of the
General Counsel, GC–71, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585. Telephone:
(202) 586–7796. Email:
Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov.
Table of Contents
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
I. Statutory Authority
II. Current Rulemaking Process
III. Definition(s)
IV. Evaluation of Compressors as a Covered
Equipment
A. Energy Consumption in Operation
B. Distribution in Commerce
C. Prior Inclusion as a Covered Product
D. Coverage Necessary To Carry Out
Purposes of Part A–1 of the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act
V. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act of 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act of 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under the Information Quality
Bulletin for Peer Review
VI. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
B. Issues on Which the Department of
Energy Seeks Comments
I. Statutory Authority
Title III of the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), as
amended (42 U.S.C. 6291 et seq.), sets
forth various provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency. Part C of
Title III of EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6311–6317),
which was re-designated for editorial
reasons as Part A–1 upon codification in
the U.S. Code, establishes the ‘‘Energy
Conservation Program for Certain
Industrial Equipment,’’ which covers
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:33 Dec 28, 2012
Jkt 229001
certain commercial and industrial
equipment (hereafter referred to as
‘‘covered equipment’’).
EPCA specifies a list of equipment
that constitutes covered commercial and
industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C.
6311(1)(A)¥(L). The list identifies 11
types of equipment and sets forth a
twelfth provision for any other type of
industrial equipment which the
Secretary of Energy (Secretary) classifies
as covered equipment. EPCA also
specifies the types of industrial
equipment that can be classified as
covered in addition to the equipment
enumerated in 42 U.S.C. 6311(1). This
equipment includes compressors. (42
U.S.C. 6311(2)(B)(i)). Industrial
equipment must also, without regard to
whether such equipment is in fact
distributed in commerce for industrial
or commercial use, be of a type that:
(1) In operation consumes, or is
designed to consume, energy in
operation;
(2) to any significant extent, is
distributed in commerce for industrial
or commercial use; and
(3) is not a covered product as defined
in 42 U.S.C. 6291(a)(2) of EPCA, other
than a component of a covered product
with respect to which there is in effect
a determination under 42 U.S.C.
6312(c). (42 U.S.C. 6311 (2)(A)).
To classify equipment as covered
commercial or industrial equipment, the
Secretary must determine that
classifying the equipment as covered
equipment is necessary for the purposes
of Part A–1 of EPCA. The purpose of
Part A–1 is to improve the efficiency of
electric motors, pumps and certain other
industrial equipment to conserve the
energy resources of the nation. (42
U.S.C. 6312 (a), (b))
II. Current Rulemaking Process
DOE has not previously conducted an
energy conservation standard
rulemaking for compressors. If after
public comment, DOE issues a final
determination of coverage for this
equipment, DOE would consider both
test procedures and energy conservation
standards for this equipment.
With respect to test procedures, DOE
would consider proposed test
procedures for measuring the energy
efficiency, energy use, or estimated
annual operating cost of compressors
during a representative average use
cycle or period of use that are not
unduly burdensome to conduct. (42
U.S.C. 6314(a)(2)) In a test procedure
rulemaking, DOE initially prepares a
test procedure notice of proposed
rulemaking (NOPR) and allows
interested parties to present oral and
written data, views, and arguments with
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76973
respect to such procedures. In
prescribing new test procedures, DOE
takes into account relevant information
including technological developments
relating to energy use or energy
efficiency of compressors.
With respect to energy conservation
standards, DOE typically prepares
initially an energy conservation
standards rulemaking framework
document (the framework document).
The framework document explains the
issues, analyses, and process that it is
considering for the development of
energy conservation standards for
compressors. After DOE receives
comments on the framework document,
DOE typically prepares an energy
conservation standards rulemaking
preliminary analysis and technical
support document (the preliminary
analysis). The preliminary analysis
typically provides initial draft analyses
of potential energy conservation
standards on consumers, manufacturers,
and the nation. Neither of these steps is
legally required.
DOE is required to publish a NOPR
setting forth DOE’s proposed energy
conservations standards and a summary
of the results of DOE’s supporting
technical analysis. The details of DOE’s
analysis are provided in a technical
support document (TSD) that describes
the details of DOE’s analysis of both the
burdens and benefits of potential
standards, pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
6295(o). DOE affords interested persons
an opportunity during a period of not
less than 60 days after the publication
of the NOPR to provide oral and written
comment. (42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(2)) After
receiving and considering the comments
on the NOPR and not less than 90 days
after the publication of the NOPR, DOE
would issue the final rule prescribing
any new energy conservation standards
for compressors. (42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(3))
III. Definition(s)
DOE is considering a definition for
‘‘Commercial and Industrial
Compressors’’ to clarify coverage of any
potential test procedure or energy
conservation standard that may arise
from today’s proposed determination.
There is currently no statutory
definition of compressors, and DOE is
considering the following definition of
compressors to provide clarity for
interested parties as it continues its
analyses:
Compressor: A compressor is an
electric-powered device that takes in air
or gas at atmospheric pressure and
delivers the air or gas at a higher
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
76974
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Proposed Rules
pressure.1 Compressors typically have a
specific ratio, the ratio of delivery
pressure to supply pressure, greater than
1.20. Compressors are classified as
positive-displacement, dynamic, or
hybrid. A positive-displacement
compressor increases the pressure of the
intake air pressure through a
compression container. A dynamic
compressor increases pressure of the air
it intakes by continuously imparting
velocity energy into the air flow, which
is then converted into pressure energy.
A hybrid compressor is some
combination of positive-displacement
and dynamic compressors.
A compressor may have some or all of
the following components: piston,
roller, rotor(s), impeller wheel, spiral
disks, cylinder(s), lubricant, motor and
transmission, controls, treatment
equipment (after cooler and lubricant
cooler), filter(s), and/or a lubricant/air
separator.
DOE seeks feedback from interested
parties on this definition for
compressors.
IV. Evaluation of Compressors as a
Covered Equipment
The following sections describe DOE’s
evaluation of whether compressors
fulfill the criteria for being added as
covered equipment pursuant to 42
U.S.C. 6311(2) and 42 U.S.C. 6312.
Compressors are listed as a type of
industrial equipment at 42 U.S.C.
6311(2)(B)(i). The following discussion
addresses DOE’s consideration of the
three requirements of 42 U.S.C.
6311(2)(A) and 42 U.S.C. 6312.
A. Energy Consumption in Operation
Data from the 2002 United States
Industrial Electric Motor Systems
Market Opportunities Assessment
estimate total annual industrial
compressor energy use (from
Manufacturing SIC codes 20–39) at
91,050 million kWh per year.2 Since
industrial activity in 2012 is greater
than it was in 2002, it is likely that
current annual compressor energy use is
higher than this figure.
B. Distribution in Commerce
Compressors are distributed in
commerce for both the industrial and
commercial sectors. Based on the 2011
International Energy Agency (IEA)
Survey, DOE estimated that 1.3 million
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
1 Compressors
are mostly driven by electric
motors but may also be driven by diesel or natural
gas, and steam or combustion engines. At present,
DOE envisions including compressors driven only
by electric motors as covered equipment.
2 U.S. DOE Office of Industrial Technologies.
United States Industrial Electric Motor Systems
Market Opportunities Assessment. December 2002.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:33 Dec 28, 2012
Jkt 229001
motors are shipped annually to drive
compressors in the U.S. commercial and
industrial sectors.3 Based on additional
2004 U.S. Census data,4 DOE assumes
that only a small fraction of these
motors are used as a motor only
replacement in compressor systems.
Therefore, DOE estimates that there are
nearly 1.3 million compressors
distributed in commerce annually for
industrial or commercial use.
C. Prior Inclusion as a Covered Product
Compressors are not currently
included as covered products under
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, part 430 (10 CFR part 430).
D. Coverage Necessary To Carry Out
Purposes of Part A–1 of the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act
The purpose of part A–1 of EPCA is
to improve the energy efficiency of
electric motors, pumps and certain other
industrial equipment to conserve the
energy resources of the nation. Coverage
of compressors is necessary to carry out
the purposes of part A–1 of EPCA
because coverage will promote the
conservation of energy supplies.
Efficiency standards that may result
from coverage would help to capture
some portion of the potential for
improving the efficiency of
compressors.
Based on the information in section
IV of this notice, DOE proposes to
determine that commercial and
industrial compressors qualify as
covered equipment under part A–1 of
Title III of EPCA, as amended (42 U.S.C.
6311 et seq.).
V. Procedural Issues and Regulatory
Review
DOE has reviewed its proposed
determination of compressors under the
following executive orders and acts.
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that coverage
determination rulemakings do not
constitute ‘‘significant regulatory
actions’’ under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this proposed action was
not subject to review under the
Executive Order by the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) in the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
3 International
Energy Agency. Energy-Efficiency
Policy Opportunities for Electric Motor-Driven
Systems. Paris, 2011.
4 U.S. Census Bureau, MA335H(03)–1, issued Nov
2004.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
B. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996), requires
preparation of an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis for any rule that, by
law, must be proposed for public
comment, unless the agency certifies
that the proposed rule, if promulgated,
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. A regulatory flexibility analysis
examines the impact of the rule on
small entities and considers alternative
ways of reducing negative effects. Also,
as required by E.O. 13272, ‘‘Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking’’ 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential impact
of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the DOE rulemaking
process. 68 FR 7990 (February 19, 2003).
DOE makes its procedures and policies
available on the Office of the General
Counsel’s Web site at https://energy.gov/
gc/office-general-counsel.
DOE reviewed today’s proposed
determination under the provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the
policies and procedures published on
February 19, 2003. If adopted, today’s
proposed determination would set no
standards and would only positively
determine that future standards may be
warranted and should be explored in an
energy conservation standards
rulemaking. The proposed
determination also does not establish
any test procedures. If a positive
determination is made, DOE would
consider test procedures in a subsequent
rulemaking. Economic impacts on small
entities would be considered in the
context of such rulemakings. On the
basis of the foregoing, DOE certifies that
the proposed determination, if adopted,
would have no significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis
for this proposed determination. DOE
will transmit this certification and
supporting statement of factual basis to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for
review under 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
C. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed determination, which
proposes to determine that compressors
meet the criteria for classification as
covered equipment, will impose no new
information or recordkeeping
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Proposed Rules
requirements. Accordingly, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
clearance is not required under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.)
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this notice, DOE proposes to
positively determine that compressors
meet the criteria for classification as
covered equipment. Environmental
impacts would be explored in any
future energy conservation standards
rulemaking for compressors. DOE has
determined that review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), Public Law 91–190,
codified at 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. is not
required at this time. NEPA review can
only be initiated ‘‘as soon as
environmental impacts can be
meaningfully evaluated’’ (10 CFR
1021.213(b)). This proposed
determination would only determine
that compressors meet the criteria for
classification as covered equipment, but
would not itself propose to set any
specific standard. DOE has, therefore,
determined that there are no
environmental impacts to be evaluated
at this time. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order (E.O.) 13132,
‘‘Federalism’’ 64 FR 43255 (August 10,
1999), imposes certain requirements on
agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt
State law or that have Federalism
implications. The Executive Order
requires agencies to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and to assess carefully the
necessity for such actions. The
Executive Order also requires agencies
to have an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
State and local officials in developing
regulatory policies that have Federalism
implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE
published a statement of policy
describing the intergovernmental
consultation process that it will follow
in developing such regulations. 65 FR
13735 (March 14, 2000). DOE has
examined today’s proposed
determination and concludes that it
would not preempt State law or have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the Federal
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:33 Dec 28, 2012
Jkt 229001
levels of government. EPCA governs and
prescribes Federal preemption of State
regulations as to energy conservation for
the equipment that is the subject of
today’s proposed determination. States
can petition DOE for exemption from
such preemption to the extent
permitted, and based on criteria, set
forth in EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297) No
further action is required by E.O. 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of E.O.
12988, ‘‘Civil Justice Reform’’ 61 FR
4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on
Federal agencies the duty to: (1)
Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity;
(2) write regulations to minimize
litigation; (3) provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather
than a general standard; and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction.
Section 3(b) of E.O. 12988 specifically
requires that Executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation specifies the following: (1)
The preemptive effect, if any; (2) any
effect on existing Federal law or
regulation; (3) a clear legal standard for
affected conduct while promoting
simplification and burden reduction; (4)
the retroactive effect, if any; (5)
definitions of key terms; and (6) other
important issues affecting clarity and
general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of E.O. 12988
requires Executive agencies to review
regulations in light of applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to
determine whether these standards are
met, or whether it is unreasonable to
meet one or more of them. DOE
completed the required review and
determined that, to the extent permitted
by law, this proposed determination
meets the relevant standards of E.O.
12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4, codified at 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
requires each Federal agency to assess
the effects of Federal regulatory actions
on State, local, and tribal governments
and the private sector. For regulatory
actions likely to result in a rule that may
cause expenditures by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector of $100 million or
more in any 1 year (adjusted annually
for inflation), section 202 of UMRA
requires a Federal agency to publish a
written statement that estimates the
resulting costs, benefits, and other
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76975
effects on the national economy. (2
U.S.C. 1532(a) and (b)) UMRA requires
a Federal agency to develop an effective
process to permit timely input by
elected officers of State, local, and tribal
governments on a proposed ‘‘significant
intergovernmental mandate.’’ UMRA
also requires an agency plan for giving
notice and opportunity for timely input
to small governments that may be
potentially affected before establishing
any requirement that might significantly
or uniquely affect them. On March 18,
1997, DOE published a statement of
policy on its process for
intergovernmental consultation under
UMRA. 62 FR 12820 (March 18, 1997).
(This policy also is available at https://
energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel).
DOE reviewed today’s proposed
determination pursuant to these existing
authorities and its policy statement and
determined that the proposed
determination contains neither an
intergovernmental mandate nor a
mandate that may result in the
expenditure of $100 million or more in
any year, so the UMRA requirements do
not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act of 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being. This
proposed determination would not have
any impact on the autonomy or integrity
of the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
Pursuant to E.O. 12630,
‘‘Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights’’ 53 FR 8859 (March 15, 1988),
DOE determined that this proposed
determination would not result in any
takings that might require compensation
under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
J. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act of 2001
The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act of 2001
(44 U.S.C. 3516, note) requires agencies
to review most disseminations of
information they make to the public
under guidelines established by each
agency pursuant to general guidelines
issued by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). The OMB’s guidelines
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
76976
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Proposed Rules
were published at 67 FR 8452 (February
22, 2002), and DOE’s guidelines were
published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7,
2002). DOE has reviewed today’s
proposed determination under the OMB
and DOE guidelines and has concluded
that it is consistent with applicable
policies in those guidelines.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
E.O. 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,’’ 66
FR 28355 (May 22, 2001), requires
Federal agencies to prepare and submit
to OMB a Statement of Energy Effects
for any proposed significant energy
action. A ‘‘significant energy action’’ is
defined as any action by an agency that
promulgates a final rule or is expected
to lead to promulgation of a final rule,
and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory
action under E.O. 12866, or any
successor order; and (2) is likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy; or
(3) is designated by the Administrator of
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) as a significant energy
action. For any proposed significant
energy action, the agency must give a
detailed statement of any adverse effects
on energy supply, distribution, or use if
the proposal is implemented, and of
reasonable alternatives to the proposed
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
DOE has concluded that today’s
regulatory action proposing to
determine that compressors meet the
criteria for classification as covered
equipment would not have a significant
adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. This
action is also not a significant regulatory
action for purposes of E.O. 12866, and
the OIRA Administrator has not
designated this proposed determination
as a significant energy action under E.O.
12866 or any successor order. Therefore,
this proposed determination is not a
significant energy action. Accordingly,
DOE has not prepared a Statement of
Energy Effects for this proposed
determination.
L. Review Under the Information
Quality Bulletin for Peer Review
On December 16, 2004, OMB, in
consultation with the Office of Science
and Technology Policy (OSTP), issued
its Final Information Quality Bulletin
for Peer Review (the Bulletin). 70 FR
2664 (January 14, 2005). The Bulletin
establishes that certain scientific
information shall be peer reviewed by
qualified specialists before it is
disseminated by the Federal
government, including influential
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:33 Dec 28, 2012
Jkt 229001
scientific information related to agency
regulatory actions. The purpose of the
Bulletin is to enhance the quality and
credibility of the Government’s
scientific information. DOE has
determined that the analyses conducted
for this rulemaking do not constitute
‘‘influential scientific information,’’
which the Bulletin defines as ‘‘scientific
information the agency reasonably can
determine will have or does have a clear
and substantial impact on important
public policies or private sector
decisions.’’ 70 FR 2667 (January 14,
2005). The analyses were subject to predissemination review prior to issuance
of this rulemaking.
DOE will determine the appropriate
level of review that would be applicable
to any future rulemaking to establish
energy conservation standards for
compressors.
VI. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and
information regarding this notice of
proposed determination no later than
the date provided at the beginning of
this notice. After the close of the
comment period, DOE will review the
comments received and determine
whether compressors are covered
equipment under EPCA.
Comments, data, and information
submitted to DOE’s email address for
this proposed determination should be
provided in WordPerfect, Microsoft
Word, PDF, or text (ASCII) file format.
Submissions should avoid the use of
special characters or any form of
encryption, and wherever possible
comments should include the electronic
signature of the author. No
telefacsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.
According to 10 CFR Part 1004.11,
any person submitting information that
he or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit two copies: One copy of
the document should have all the
information believed to be confidential
deleted. DOE will make its own
determination as to the confidential
status of the information and treat it
according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when
evaluating requests to treat submitted
information as confidential include (1) a
description of the items; (2) whether
and why such items are customarily
treated as confidential within the
industry; (3) whether the information is
generally known or available from
public sources; (4) whether the
information has previously been made
available to others without obligations
concerning its confidentiality; (5) an
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
explanation of the competitive injury to
the submitting persons which would
result from public disclosure; (6) a date
after which such information might no
longer be considered confidential; and
(7) why disclosure of the information
would be contrary to the public interest.
B. Issues on Which the Department of
Energy Seeks Comments
DOE welcomes comments on all
aspects of this proposed determination.
DOE is particularly interested in
receiving comments from interested
parties on the following issues related to
the proposed determination for
compressors:
• Definition of compressors;
• Whether classifying compressors as
covered equipment is necessary to carry
out the purposes of Part A–1 of EPCA;
• Availability or lack of availability of
technologies for improving the energy
efficiency of compressors.
DOE invites all interested parties to
submit, in writing and by January 30,
2013, comments and information on
matters addressed in this notice and on
other matters relevant to a
determination for compressors. DOE is
also interested in receiving views
concerning other issues relevant to
establishing a test procedure and energy
conservation standard for compressors.
After the expiration of the period for
submitting written statements, DOE will
consider all comments and additional
information that is obtained from
interested parties or through further
analyses, and it will prepare a final
determination. If DOE determines that
compressors qualify as covered
equipment, DOE will consider a test
procedure and energy conservation
standards for compressors. Members of
the public will be given an opportunity
to submit written and oral comments on
any proposed test procedure and
standards.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 431
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
21, 2012.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2012–31393 Filed 12–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 250 (Monday, December 31, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76972-76976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31393]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
[Docket No. EERE-2012-BT-DET-0033]
RIN 1904-AC83
Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products and Certain
Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Proposed Determination of
Commercial and Industrial Compressors as Covered Equipment
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Proposed determination of coverage.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to determine that
commercial and industrial compressors meet the criteria for covered
equipment under Part A-1 of Title III of the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (EPCA), as amended. DOE proposes that classifying
equipment of such type as covered equipment is necessary to carry out
the purpose of Part A-1 of EPCA, which is to improve the efficiency of
electric motors and pumps and certain other industrial equipment to
conserve the energy resources of the nation.
DATES: DOE will accept written comments, data, and information on this
notice, but no later than January 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may submit comments, identified by docket
number EERE-2012-BT-DET-0033 or RIN 1904-AC83, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: CompressorsDetermination2012DET0033@ee.doe.gov.
Include EERE-2012-BT-DET-0033 and/or RIN 1904-AC83 in the subject line
of the message.
Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, Notice of Proposed
Determination for Compressors, EERE-2012-BT-DET-0033 and/or RIN 1904-
AC83, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. Phone:
(202) 586-2945. Please submit one signed paper original.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Suite 600, 950 L'Enfant Plaza
SW., Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202) 586-2945. Please submit one
signed paper original.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for this rulemaking.
Docket: The docket is available for review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices, comments, and other supporting
documents/materials. All documents in the docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. However, not all documents listed in
the index may be publicly available, such as information that is exempt
from public disclosure.
A link to the docket web page can be found at: www.regulations.gov
docket no. EERE-2012-BT-DET-0033. This web page contains a link to the
docket for this notice on the www.regulations.gov site. The
regulations.gov web page contains instructions on how to access all
[[Page 76973]]
documents, including public comments, in the docket. See section VII
for further information on how to submit comments through
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Raba, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies, EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20585-0121, Telephone: (202) 586-8654. Email: Jim.Raba@ee.doe.gov.
In the Office of General Counsel, contact Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC-71, 1000
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585. Telephone: (202) 586-
7796. Email: Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov.
Table of Contents
I. Statutory Authority
II. Current Rulemaking Process
III. Definition(s)
IV. Evaluation of Compressors as a Covered Equipment
A. Energy Consumption in Operation
B. Distribution in Commerce
C. Prior Inclusion as a Covered Product
D. Coverage Necessary To Carry Out Purposes of Part A-1 of the
Energy Policy and Conservation Act
V. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act of 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act of 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under the Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review
VI. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
B. Issues on Which the Department of Energy Seeks Comments
I. Statutory Authority
Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA),
as amended (42 U.S.C. 6291 et seq.), sets forth various provisions
designed to improve energy efficiency. Part C of Title III of EPCA (42
U.S.C. 6311-6317), which was re-designated for editorial reasons as
Part A-1 upon codification in the U.S. Code, establishes the ``Energy
Conservation Program for Certain Industrial Equipment,'' which covers
certain commercial and industrial equipment (hereafter referred to as
``covered equipment'').
EPCA specifies a list of equipment that constitutes covered
commercial and industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6311(1)(A)-(L). The
list identifies 11 types of equipment and sets forth a twelfth
provision for any other type of industrial equipment which the
Secretary of Energy (Secretary) classifies as covered equipment. EPCA
also specifies the types of industrial equipment that can be classified
as covered in addition to the equipment enumerated in 42 U.S.C.
6311(1). This equipment includes compressors. (42 U.S.C.
6311(2)(B)(i)). Industrial equipment must also, without regard to
whether such equipment is in fact distributed in commerce for
industrial or commercial use, be of a type that:
(1) In operation consumes, or is designed to consume, energy in
operation;
(2) to any significant extent, is distributed in commerce for
industrial or commercial use; and
(3) is not a covered product as defined in 42 U.S.C. 6291(a)(2) of
EPCA, other than a component of a covered product with respect to which
there is in effect a determination under 42 U.S.C. 6312(c). (42 U.S.C.
6311 (2)(A)).
To classify equipment as covered commercial or industrial
equipment, the Secretary must determine that classifying the equipment
as covered equipment is necessary for the purposes of Part A-1 of EPCA.
The purpose of Part A-1 is to improve the efficiency of electric
motors, pumps and certain other industrial equipment to conserve the
energy resources of the nation. (42 U.S.C. 6312 (a), (b))
II. Current Rulemaking Process
DOE has not previously conducted an energy conservation standard
rulemaking for compressors. If after public comment, DOE issues a final
determination of coverage for this equipment, DOE would consider both
test procedures and energy conservation standards for this equipment.
With respect to test procedures, DOE would consider proposed test
procedures for measuring the energy efficiency, energy use, or
estimated annual operating cost of compressors during a representative
average use cycle or period of use that are not unduly burdensome to
conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6314(a)(2)) In a test procedure rulemaking, DOE
initially prepares a test procedure notice of proposed rulemaking
(NOPR) and allows interested parties to present oral and written data,
views, and arguments with respect to such procedures. In prescribing
new test procedures, DOE takes into account relevant information
including technological developments relating to energy use or energy
efficiency of compressors.
With respect to energy conservation standards, DOE typically
prepares initially an energy conservation standards rulemaking
framework document (the framework document). The framework document
explains the issues, analyses, and process that it is considering for
the development of energy conservation standards for compressors. After
DOE receives comments on the framework document, DOE typically prepares
an energy conservation standards rulemaking preliminary analysis and
technical support document (the preliminary analysis). The preliminary
analysis typically provides initial draft analyses of potential energy
conservation standards on consumers, manufacturers, and the nation.
Neither of these steps is legally required.
DOE is required to publish a NOPR setting forth DOE's proposed
energy conservations standards and a summary of the results of DOE's
supporting technical analysis. The details of DOE's analysis are
provided in a technical support document (TSD) that describes the
details of DOE's analysis of both the burdens and benefits of potential
standards, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6295(o). DOE affords interested
persons an opportunity during a period of not less than 60 days after
the publication of the NOPR to provide oral and written comment. (42
U.S.C. 6295(p)(2)) After receiving and considering the comments on the
NOPR and not less than 90 days after the publication of the NOPR, DOE
would issue the final rule prescribing any new energy conservation
standards for compressors. (42 U.S.C. 6295(p)(3))
III. Definition(s)
DOE is considering a definition for ``Commercial and Industrial
Compressors'' to clarify coverage of any potential test procedure or
energy conservation standard that may arise from today's proposed
determination. There is currently no statutory definition of
compressors, and DOE is considering the following definition of
compressors to provide clarity for interested parties as it continues
its analyses:
Compressor: A compressor is an electric-powered device that takes
in air or gas at atmospheric pressure and delivers the air or gas at a
higher
[[Page 76974]]
pressure.\1\ Compressors typically have a specific ratio, the ratio of
delivery pressure to supply pressure, greater than 1.20. Compressors
are classified as positive-displacement, dynamic, or hybrid. A
positive-displacement compressor increases the pressure of the intake
air pressure through a compression container. A dynamic compressor
increases pressure of the air it intakes by continuously imparting
velocity energy into the air flow, which is then converted into
pressure energy. A hybrid compressor is some combination of positive-
displacement and dynamic compressors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Compressors are mostly driven by electric motors but may
also be driven by diesel or natural gas, and steam or combustion
engines. At present, DOE envisions including compressors driven only
by electric motors as covered equipment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A compressor may have some or all of the following components:
piston, roller, rotor(s), impeller wheel, spiral disks, cylinder(s),
lubricant, motor and transmission, controls, treatment equipment (after
cooler and lubricant cooler), filter(s), and/or a lubricant/air
separator.
DOE seeks feedback from interested parties on this definition for
compressors.
IV. Evaluation of Compressors as a Covered Equipment
The following sections describe DOE's evaluation of whether
compressors fulfill the criteria for being added as covered equipment
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6311(2) and 42 U.S.C. 6312.
Compressors are listed as a type of industrial equipment at 42
U.S.C. 6311(2)(B)(i). The following discussion addresses DOE's
consideration of the three requirements of 42 U.S.C. 6311(2)(A) and 42
U.S.C. 6312.
A. Energy Consumption in Operation
Data from the 2002 United States Industrial Electric Motor Systems
Market Opportunities Assessment estimate total annual industrial
compressor energy use (from Manufacturing SIC codes 20-39) at 91,050
million kWh per year.\2\ Since industrial activity in 2012 is greater
than it was in 2002, it is likely that current annual compressor energy
use is higher than this figure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ U.S. DOE Office of Industrial Technologies. United States
Industrial Electric Motor Systems Market Opportunities Assessment.
December 2002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Distribution in Commerce
Compressors are distributed in commerce for both the industrial and
commercial sectors. Based on the 2011 International Energy Agency (IEA)
Survey, DOE estimated that 1.3 million motors are shipped annually to
drive compressors in the U.S. commercial and industrial sectors.\3\
Based on additional 2004 U.S. Census data,\4\ DOE assumes that only a
small fraction of these motors are used as a motor only replacement in
compressor systems. Therefore, DOE estimates that there are nearly 1.3
million compressors distributed in commerce annually for industrial or
commercial use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ International Energy Agency. Energy-Efficiency Policy
Opportunities for Electric Motor-Driven Systems. Paris, 2011.
\4\ U.S. Census Bureau, MA335H(03)-1, issued Nov 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Prior Inclusion as a Covered Product
Compressors are not currently included as covered products under
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 430 (10 CFR part
430).
D. Coverage Necessary To Carry Out Purposes of Part A-1 of the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act
The purpose of part A-1 of EPCA is to improve the energy efficiency
of electric motors, pumps and certain other industrial equipment to
conserve the energy resources of the nation. Coverage of compressors is
necessary to carry out the purposes of part A-1 of EPCA because
coverage will promote the conservation of energy supplies. Efficiency
standards that may result from coverage would help to capture some
portion of the potential for improving the efficiency of compressors.
Based on the information in section IV of this notice, DOE proposes
to determine that commercial and industrial compressors qualify as
covered equipment under part A-1 of Title III of EPCA, as amended (42
U.S.C. 6311 et seq.).
V. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
DOE has reviewed its proposed determination of compressors under
the following executive orders and acts.
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that coverage
determination rulemakings do not constitute ``significant regulatory
actions'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). Accordingly, this
proposed action was not subject to review under the Executive Order by
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996),
requires preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis for
any rule that, by law, must be proposed for public comment, unless the
agency certifies that the proposed rule, if promulgated, will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. A regulatory flexibility analysis examines the impact of the
rule on small entities and considers alternative ways of reducing
negative effects. Also, as required by E.O. 13272, ``Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking'' 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published procedures and policies on February
19, 2003, to ensure that the potential impact of its rules on small
entities are properly considered during the DOE rulemaking process. 68
FR 7990 (February 19, 2003). DOE makes its procedures and policies
available on the Office of the General Counsel's Web site at https://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel.
DOE reviewed today's proposed determination under the provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the policies and procedures
published on February 19, 2003. If adopted, today's proposed
determination would set no standards and would only positively
determine that future standards may be warranted and should be explored
in an energy conservation standards rulemaking. The proposed
determination also does not establish any test procedures. If a
positive determination is made, DOE would consider test procedures in a
subsequent rulemaking. Economic impacts on small entities would be
considered in the context of such rulemakings. On the basis of the
foregoing, DOE certifies that the proposed determination, if adopted,
would have no significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a regulatory
flexibility analysis for this proposed determination. DOE will transmit
this certification and supporting statement of factual basis to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for
review under 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed determination, which proposes to determine that
compressors meet the criteria for classification as covered equipment,
will impose no new information or recordkeeping
[[Page 76975]]
requirements. Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
clearance is not required under the Paperwork Reduction Act. (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.)
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this notice, DOE proposes to positively determine that
compressors meet the criteria for classification as covered equipment.
Environmental impacts would be explored in any future energy
conservation standards rulemaking for compressors. DOE has determined
that review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA),
Public Law 91-190, codified at 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. is not required
at this time. NEPA review can only be initiated ``as soon as
environmental impacts can be meaningfully evaluated'' (10 CFR
1021.213(b)). This proposed determination would only determine that
compressors meet the criteria for classification as covered equipment,
but would not itself propose to set any specific standard. DOE has,
therefore, determined that there are no environmental impacts to be
evaluated at this time. Accordingly, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order (E.O.) 13132, ``Federalism'' 64 FR 43255 (August
10, 1999), imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and
implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that
have Federalism implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to
examine the constitutional and statutory authority supporting any
action that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States and
to assess carefully the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order
also requires agencies to have an accountable process to ensure
meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in developing
regulatory policies that have Federalism implications. On March 14,
2000, DOE published a statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process that it will follow in
developing such regulations. 65 FR 13735 (March 14, 2000). DOE has
examined today's proposed determination and concludes that it would not
preempt State law or have substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the Federal government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. EPCA governs and prescribes Federal preemption of State
regulations as to energy conservation for the equipment that is the
subject of today's proposed determination. States can petition DOE for
exemption from such preemption to the extent permitted, and based on
criteria, set forth in EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297) No further action is
required by E.O. 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of E.O. 12988, ``Civil
Justice Reform'' 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on Federal
agencies the duty to: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2)
write regulations to minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather than a general standard; and (4)
promote simplification and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of E.O. 12988
specifically requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable
effort to ensure that the regulation specifies the following: (1) The
preemptive effect, if any; (2) any effect on existing Federal law or
regulation; (3) a clear legal standard for affected conduct while
promoting simplification and burden reduction; (4) the retroactive
effect, if any; (5) definitions of key terms; and (6) other important
issues affecting clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines
issued by the Attorney General. Section 3(c) of E.O. 12988 requires
Executive agencies to review regulations in light of applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine whether these
standards are met, or whether it is unreasonable to meet one or more of
them. DOE completed the required review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, this proposed determination meets the relevant
standards of E.O. 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub.
L. 104-4, codified at 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) requires each Federal
agency to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments and the private sector. For regulatory
actions likely to result in a rule that may cause expenditures by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more in any 1 year (adjusted annually
for inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency to
publish a written statement that estimates the resulting costs,
benefits, and other effects on the national economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a)
and (b)) UMRA requires a Federal agency to develop an effective process
to permit timely input by elected officers of State, local, and tribal
governments on a proposed ``significant intergovernmental mandate.''
UMRA also requires an agency plan for giving notice and opportunity for
timely input to small governments that may be potentially affected
before establishing any requirement that might significantly or
uniquely affect them. On March 18, 1997, DOE published a statement of
policy on its process for intergovernmental consultation under UMRA. 62
FR 12820 (March 18, 1997). (This policy also is available at https://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel). DOE reviewed today's proposed
determination pursuant to these existing authorities and its policy
statement and determined that the proposed determination contains
neither an intergovernmental mandate nor a mandate that may result in
the expenditure of $100 million or more in any year, so the UMRA
requirements do not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act
of 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a
Family Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family
well-being. This proposed determination would not have any impact on
the autonomy or integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly,
DOE has concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
Pursuant to E.O. 12630, ``Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights'' 53 FR 8859 (March 15,
1988), DOE determined that this proposed determination would not result
in any takings that might require compensation under the Fifth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act
of 2001
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act of 2001 (44
U.S.C. 3516, note) requires agencies to review most disseminations of
information they make to the public under guidelines established by
each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). The OMB's guidelines
[[Page 76976]]
were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE's guidelines
were published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has reviewed
today's proposed determination under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in those
guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
E.O. 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly
Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355 (May 22,
2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OMB a
Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed significant energy action.
A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an agency
that promulgates a final rule or is expected to lead to promulgation of
a final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory action under
E.O. 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy; or (3) is designated by the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) as a significant energy
action. For any proposed significant energy action, the agency must
give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on energy supply,
distribution, or use if the proposal is implemented, and of reasonable
alternatives to the proposed action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
DOE has concluded that today's regulatory action proposing to
determine that compressors meet the criteria for classification as
covered equipment would not have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy. This action is also not a
significant regulatory action for purposes of E.O. 12866, and the OIRA
Administrator has not designated this proposed determination as a
significant energy action under E.O. 12866 or any successor order.
Therefore, this proposed determination is not a significant energy
action. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy Effects
for this proposed determination.
L. Review Under the Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review
On December 16, 2004, OMB, in consultation with the Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), issued its Final Information
Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (the Bulletin). 70 FR 2664 (January
14, 2005). The Bulletin establishes that certain scientific information
shall be peer reviewed by qualified specialists before it is
disseminated by the Federal government, including influential
scientific information related to agency regulatory actions. The
purpose of the Bulletin is to enhance the quality and credibility of
the Government's scientific information. DOE has determined that the
analyses conducted for this rulemaking do not constitute ``influential
scientific information,'' which the Bulletin defines as ``scientific
information the agency reasonably can determine will have or does have
a clear and substantial impact on important public policies or private
sector decisions.'' 70 FR 2667 (January 14, 2005). The analyses were
subject to pre-dissemination review prior to issuance of this
rulemaking.
DOE will determine the appropriate level of review that would be
applicable to any future rulemaking to establish energy conservation
standards for compressors.
VI. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this
notice of proposed determination no later than the date provided at the
beginning of this notice. After the close of the comment period, DOE
will review the comments received and determine whether compressors are
covered equipment under EPCA.
Comments, data, and information submitted to DOE's email address
for this proposed determination should be provided in WordPerfect,
Microsoft Word, PDF, or text (ASCII) file format. Submissions should
avoid the use of special characters or any form of encryption, and
wherever possible comments should include the electronic signature of
the author. No telefacsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.
According to 10 CFR Part 1004.11, any person submitting information
that he or she believes to be confidential and exempt by law from
public disclosure should submit two copies: One copy of the document
should have all the information believed to be confidential deleted.
DOE will make its own determination as to the confidential status of
the information and treat it according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat
submitted information as confidential include (1) a description of the
items; (2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as
confidential within the industry; (3) whether the information is
generally known or available from public sources; (4) whether the
information has previously been made available to others without
obligations concerning its confidentiality; (5) an explanation of the
competitive injury to the submitting persons which would result from
public disclosure; (6) a date after which such information might no
longer be considered confidential; and (7) why disclosure of the
information would be contrary to the public interest.
B. Issues on Which the Department of Energy Seeks Comments
DOE welcomes comments on all aspects of this proposed
determination. DOE is particularly interested in receiving comments
from interested parties on the following issues related to the proposed
determination for compressors:
Definition of compressors;
Whether classifying compressors as covered equipment is
necessary to carry out the purposes of Part A-1 of EPCA;
Availability or lack of availability of technologies for
improving the energy efficiency of compressors.
DOE invites all interested parties to submit, in writing and by
January 30, 2013, comments and information on matters addressed in this
notice and on other matters relevant to a determination for
compressors. DOE is also interested in receiving views concerning other
issues relevant to establishing a test procedure and energy
conservation standard for compressors.
After the expiration of the period for submitting written
statements, DOE will consider all comments and additional information
that is obtained from interested parties or through further analyses,
and it will prepare a final determination. If DOE determines that
compressors qualify as covered equipment, DOE will consider a test
procedure and energy conservation standards for compressors. Members of
the public will be given an opportunity to submit written and oral
comments on any proposed test procedure and standards.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 431
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 21, 2012.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2012-31393 Filed 12-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P