Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Afghanistan and Change to Policy on Prohibited Exports, 76864-76865 [2012-31217]
Download as PDF
76864
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Conditions of use in dogs—(1)
Amount. Administer 0.1 mg per
kilogram of body weight once daily
using the metered dose pump.
(2) Indications for use. For the control
of pain and inflammation associated
with osteoarthritis in dogs.
(3) Limitations. Federal law restricts
this drug to use by or on the order of
a licensed veterinarian.
PART 558—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR
USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS
7. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 558 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b, 371.
§ 558.342
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
[Amended]
8. In § 558.342, in the table, in
paragraph (e)(1)(xi), in the
‘‘Limitations’’ column, revise the last
sentence to read ‘‘Monensin provided
by No. 000986 and tylosin provided by
Nos. 000986 and 016592 in § 510.600(c)
of this chapter.’’; and in the ‘‘Sponsor’’
column, add ‘‘016592’’.
■
Dated: December 26, 2012.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2012–31397 Filed 12–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 120 and 126
[Public Notice 8135]
RIN 1400–AD26
Amendment to the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations: Afghanistan and
Change to Policy on Prohibited
Exports
Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of State is
amending the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) to list
Afghanistan as a major non-NATO ally,
and to make available the use of two
additional defense export license
exemptions for proscribed destinations.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective December 31, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Candace M. J. Goforth, Director, Office
of Defense Trade Controls Policy, U.S.
Department of State, telephone (202)
663–2792, or email
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Regulatory Change, Afghanistan and
126.1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6,
2012, President Obama exercised his
ebenthall on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
01:38 Dec 29, 2012
authority under section 517 of the
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA) to
designate the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan as a major non-NATO ally
(MNNA) for purposes of the FAA and
the Arms Export Control Act. This final
rule amends ITAR § 120.32, which lists
major non-NATO allies, to account for
this designation. Section 126.1 is
amended to except the exemptions at
ITAR §§ 126.4 and 126.6 from the
prohibitions therein and the text is
further amended to clarify the
requirements therein. Additionally,
§ 126.1(g) is amended to clarify
references to United Nations Security
Council resolutions.
Jkt 229001
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the
opinion that controlling the import and
export of defense articles and services is
a foreign affairs function of the United
States Government and that rules
implementing this function are exempt
from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative
Procedure Act. Since the Department is
of the opinion that this rule is exempt
from 5 U.S.C. 553, it is the view of the
Department that the provisions of
section 553(d) do not apply to this
rulemaking. Therefore, this rule is
effective upon publication. The
Department also finds that, given the
national security issues surrounding
U.S. policy towards Afghanistan, notice
and public procedure on this rule would
be impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest; for the
same reason, the rule will be effective
immediately.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since the Department is of the
opinion that this rule is exempt from the
rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553,
it does not require analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a
mandate that will result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rulemaking has been found not
to be a major rule within the meaning
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this rulemaking
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity).
These Executive Orders stress the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been
designated ‘‘significant regulatory
actions,’’ although not economically
significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
this rulemaking in light of sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirement of
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Parts 120 and
126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter
M, parts 120 and 126 are amended as
follows:
PART 120—PURPOSE AND
DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 120
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); 22 U.S.C. 2794; E.O. 11958, 42 FR
4311; E.O. 13284, 68 FR 4075; 3 CFR, 1977
Comp. p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub. L. 105–
261, 112 Stat. 1920; Pub. L. 111–266.
2. Section 120.32 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 120.32
Major non-NATO ally.
Major non-NATO ally, as defined in
section 644(q) of the Foreign Assistance
Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2403(q)), means
a country that is designated in
accordance with section 517 of the
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22
U.S.C. 2321(k)) as a major non-NATO
ally for purposes of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2151 et
seq. and 22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.). The
following countries are designated as
major non-NATO allies: Afghanistan
(see § 126.1(g) of this subchapter),
Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Egypt,
Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco,
New Zealand, Pakistan, the Philippines,
Thailand, and Republic of Korea.
Taiwan shall be treated as though it
were designated a major non-NATO
ally.
PART 126—GENERAL POLICIES AND
PROVISIONS
3. The authority citation for part 126
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42, and 71, Pub.
L. 90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2780, 2791, and 2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR
4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 79; 22 U.S.C.
2651a; 22 U.S.C. 287c; E.O. 12918, 59 FR
28205; 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; Sec. 1225,
Pub. L. 108–375; Sec. 7089, Pub. L. 111–117;
Pub. L. 111–266; Section 7045, Pub. L. 112–
74; Section 7046, Pub. L. 112–74.
4. Section 126.1 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (g) to read as
follows:
ebenthall on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
■
(a) General. It is the policy of the
United States to deny licenses and other
01:38 Dec 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
Dated: December 18, 2012.
Rose E. Gottemoeller,
Acting Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012–31217 Filed 12–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AO58
§ 126.1 Prohibited exports, imports, and
sales to or from certain countries.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
approvals for exports and imports of
defense articles and defense services
destined for or originating in certain
countries. This policy applies to
Belarus, Cuba, Eritrea, Iran, North
Korea, Syria, and Venezuela. This
policy also applies to countries with
respect to which the United States
maintains an arms embargo (e.g., Burma,
China, and the Republic of the Sudan)
or whenever an export would not
otherwise be in furtherance of world
peace and the security and foreign
policy of the United States. Information
regarding certain other embargoes
appears elsewhere in this section.
Comprehensive arms embargoes are
normally the subject of a State
Department notice published in the
Federal Register. The exemptions
provided in this subchapter, except
§§ 123.17, 126.4, and 126.6 of this
subchapter or when the recipient is a
U.S. Government department or agency,
do not apply with respect to defense
articles or defense services originating
in or for export to any proscribed
countries, areas, or persons identified in
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Afghanistan. It is the policy of the
United States to deny licenses or other
approvals for exports and imports of
defense articles and defense services,
destined for or originating in
Afghanistan, except that a license or
other approval may be issued, on a caseby-case basis, for the Government of
Afghanistan or coalition forces. In
addition, the names of individuals,
groups, undertakings, and entities
subject to arms embargoes, due to their
affiliation with the Taliban, Al-Qaida, or
those associated with them, are
published in lists maintained by the
United Nations Security Council’s
Sanctions Committees (established
pursuant to United Nations Security
Council resolutions (UNSCR) 1267,
1988, and 1989).
*
*
*
*
*
Copayments for Medications in 2013
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
76865
Interim final rule.
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) amends its medical
regulations concerning the copayment
required for certain medications. But for
this rulemaking, beginning on January 1,
2013, the copayment amount would
increase based on a formula set forth in
regulation. The maximum annual
copayment amount payable by veterans
would also increase. For 2012, VA
‘‘froze’’ the copayment amount for
veterans in VA’s health care system
enrollment priority categories 2 through
6, but allowed copayments to increase
based on the regulatory formula for
veterans in priority categories 7 and 8.
However, that formula did not trigger an
increase in the copayment amount for
veterans in priority categories 7 and 8.
This rulemaking freezes copayments at
the current rate for veterans in priority
categories 2 through 8 for 2013, and
thereafter resumes increasing
copayments in accordance with the
regulatory formula.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on December 31, 2012.
Comments must be received on or
before March 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by email through https://
www.regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulation Policy
and Management (02REG), Department
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont
Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington,
DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AO58, Copayments for Medications in
2013.’’ Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll-free
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Cunningham, Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461–1599. (This is not a
toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 38
U.S.C. 1722A(a), VA must require
veterans to pay a $2 copayment for each
30-day supply of medication furnished
on an outpatient basis for the treatment
of a non-service-connected disability or
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 250 (Monday, December 31, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76864-76865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31217]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 120 and 126
[Public Notice 8135]
RIN 1400-AD26
Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations:
Afghanistan and Change to Policy on Prohibited Exports
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State is amending the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to list Afghanistan as a major non-NATO
ally, and to make available the use of two additional defense export
license exemptions for proscribed destinations.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective December 31, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Candace M. J. Goforth, Director,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, U.S. Department of State,
telephone (202) 663-2792, or email DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Regulatory Change, Afghanistan and 126.1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6, 2012, President Obama exercised
his authority under section 517 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961
(FAA) to designate the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan as a major non-
NATO ally (MNNA) for purposes of the FAA and the Arms Export Control
Act. This final rule amends ITAR Sec. 120.32, which lists major non-
NATO allies, to account for this designation. Section 126.1 is amended
to except the exemptions at ITAR Sec. Sec. 126.4 and 126.6 from the
prohibitions therein and the text is further amended to clarify the
requirements therein. Additionally, Sec. 126.1(g) is amended to
clarify references to United Nations Security Council resolutions.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the opinion that controlling the
import and export of defense articles and services is a foreign affairs
function of the United States Government and that rules implementing
this function are exempt from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative Procedure Act. Since the
Department is of the opinion that this rule is exempt from 5 U.S.C.
553, it is the view of the Department that the provisions of section
553(d) do not apply to this rulemaking. Therefore, this rule is
effective upon publication. The Department also finds that, given the
national security issues surrounding U.S. policy towards Afghanistan,
notice and public procedure on this rule would be impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest; for the same reason,
the rule will be effective immediately.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since the Department is of the opinion that this rule is exempt
from the rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, it does not require
analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore,
no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rulemaking has been found not to be a major rule within the
meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this rulemaking does not have
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributed impacts, and equity). These
Executive Orders stress the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated ``significant regulatory
actions,'' although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed this rulemaking in light of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate
ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and
reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt
tribal law. Accordingly, the requirement of Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements
[[Page 76865]]
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Parts 120 and 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Title 22, Chapter I,
Subchapter M, parts 120 and 126 are amended as follows:
PART 120--PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 120 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744 (22
U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797); 22 U.S.C. 2794; E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311;
E.O. 13284, 68 FR 4075; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp. p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a;
Pub. L. 105-261, 112 Stat. 1920; Pub. L. 111-266.
0
2. Section 120.32 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 120.32 Major non-NATO ally.
Major non-NATO ally, as defined in section 644(q) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2403(q)), means a country that is
designated in accordance with section 517 of the Foreign Assistance Act
of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321(k)) as a major non-NATO ally for purposes of
the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms Export Control Act (22
U.S.C. 2151 et seq. and 22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.). The following
countries are designated as major non-NATO allies: Afghanistan (see
Sec. 126.1(g) of this subchapter), Argentina, Australia, Bahrain,
Egypt, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, New Zealand, Pakistan,
the Philippines, Thailand, and Republic of Korea. Taiwan shall be
treated as though it were designated a major non-NATO ally.
PART 126--GENERAL POLICIES AND PROVISIONS
0
3. The authority citation for part 126 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat.
744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2780, 2791, and 2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR
4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 287c;
E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205; 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; Sec. 1225, Pub.
L. 108-375; Sec. 7089, Pub. L. 111-117; Pub. L. 111-266; Section
7045, Pub. L. 112-74; Section 7046, Pub. L. 112-74.
0
4. Section 126.1 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (g) to read
as follows:
Sec. 126.1 Prohibited exports, imports, and sales to or from certain
countries.
(a) General. It is the policy of the United States to deny licenses
and other approvals for exports and imports of defense articles and
defense services destined for or originating in certain countries. This
policy applies to Belarus, Cuba, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Syria, and
Venezuela. This policy also applies to countries with respect to which
the United States maintains an arms embargo (e.g., Burma, China, and
the Republic of the Sudan) or whenever an export would not otherwise be
in furtherance of world peace and the security and foreign policy of
the United States. Information regarding certain other embargoes
appears elsewhere in this section. Comprehensive arms embargoes are
normally the subject of a State Department notice published in the
Federal Register. The exemptions provided in this subchapter, except
Sec. Sec. 123.17, 126.4, and 126.6 of this subchapter or when the
recipient is a U.S. Government department or agency, do not apply with
respect to defense articles or defense services originating in or for
export to any proscribed countries, areas, or persons identified in
this section.
* * * * *
(g) Afghanistan. It is the policy of the United States to deny
licenses or other approvals for exports and imports of defense articles
and defense services, destined for or originating in Afghanistan,
except that a license or other approval may be issued, on a case-by-
case basis, for the Government of Afghanistan or coalition forces. In
addition, the names of individuals, groups, undertakings, and entities
subject to arms embargoes, due to their affiliation with the Taliban,
Al-Qaida, or those associated with them, are published in lists
maintained by the United Nations Security Council's Sanctions
Committees (established pursuant to United Nations Security Council
resolutions (UNSCR) 1267, 1988, and 1989).
* * * * *
Dated: December 18, 2012.
Rose E. Gottemoeller,
Acting Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-31217 Filed 12-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P