Opening of Boquillas Border Crossing and Update to the Class B Port of Entry Description, 76346-76352 [2012-31328]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
76346
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
this increase. The Committee not only
considered leaving the salable quantity
and allotment percentage unchanged,
but also considered other potential
levels of increase. The Committee
reached its recommendation to increase
the salable quantity and allotment
percentage for both Scotch and Native
spearmint oil after careful consideration
of all available information and input
from all interested industry participants,
and believes that the levels
recommended will achieve the
objectives sought. Without the increase,
the Committee believes the industry
would not be able to satisfactorily meet
market demand.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178,
Vegetable and Specialty Crop Marketing
Orders. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
spearmint oil handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
spearmint oil industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee
meetings, the October 17, 2012, meeting
was a public meeting and all entities,
both large and small, were able to
express their views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:32 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at
the previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This rule invites comments on a
change to the salable quantity and
allotment percentage for both Scotch
and Native spearmint oil for the 2012–
2013 marketing year. Any comments
received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that this
interim rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule increases the
quantity of Scotch and Native spearmint
oil that may be marketed during the
marketing year, which ends on May 31,
2013; (2) the current quantity of Scotch
and Native spearmint oil may be
inadequate to meet demand for the
2012–2013 marketing year, thus making
the additional oil available as soon as is
practicable will be beneficial to both
handlers and producers; (3) the
Committee recommended these changes
at a public meeting and interested
parties had an opportunity to provide
input; and (4) this rule provides a 60day comment period and any comments
received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 985
Marketing agreements, Oils and fats,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Spearmint oil.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 985 is amended as
follows:
PART 985—MARKETING ORDER
REGULATING THE HANDLING OF
SPEARMINT OIL PRODUCED IN THE
FAR WEST
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 985 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 985.231, paragraphs (a) and (b)
are revised to read as follows:
■
Note: This section will not appear in the
annual Code of Federal Regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 985.231 Salable quantities and allotment
percentages—2012–2013 marketing year.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Class 1 (Scotch) oil—a salable
quantity of 2,622,115 pounds and an
allotment percentage of 128 percent.
(b) Class 3 (Native) oil—a salable
quantity of 1,348,270 pounds and an
allotment percentage of 58 percent.
Dated: December 20, 2012.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–31102 Filed 12–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Part 100
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 101
[Docket No. USCBP–2011–0032; CBP Dec.
No. 12–23]
RIN 1651–AA90
Opening of Boquillas Border Crossing
and Update to the Class B Port of
Entry Description
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule establishes a border
crossing in Big Bend National Park
called Boquillas and designates it as a
Customs station for customs purposes
and a Class B port of entry (POE) for
immigration purposes. The Boquillas
crossing will be situated between
Presidio and Del Rio, Texas. U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
and the National Park Service (NPS) are
partnering on the construction of a joint
use facility in Big Bend National Park
where the border crossing will operate.
This rule also updates the description
of a Class B port of entry to reflect
current border crossing documentation
requirements.
DATES:
Effective Date: January 28, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colleen Manaher, Director, Land Border
Integration, CBP Office of Field
Operations, telephone 202–344–3003.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
establishes a border crossing in Big
Bend National Park called Boquillas and
designates it as a Customs station for
customs purposes and a Class B port of
entry for immigration purposes.
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Summary
In 2010, the Presidents of the United
States and Mexico issued a joint
statement supporting the designation of
a region of protected areas on both sides
of the Rio Grande, including Big Bend
National Park, as a region of binational
interest. In support of this, CBP began
working with the National Park Service
to establish a border crossing to allow
authorized travel between the areas in
the United States and Mexico. On
October 28, 2011, CBP published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
in the Federal Register (76 FR 66862),
which solicited public comment. The
NPRM proposed to establish a Class B
port of entry/Customs station in Big
Bend National Park called Boquillas.
Boquillas was proposed to be a Class B
port of entry for immigration purposes
under 8 CFR 100.4 and a Customs
station for customs purposes in 19 CFR
101.4. In the NPRM and in this final
rule, the Class B port of entry/Customs
station is referred to as a border
crossing. The NPRM also proposed to
update the description of a Class B port
of entry in 8 CFR 101.4 to reflect current
border crossing document requirements.
The Boquillas border crossing will
service only pedestrians visiting Big
Bend National Park and Mexican
Protected Areas; CBP will not process
cargo, commercial entries, or vehicles at
Boquillas.
CBP received 47 comments in
response to the NPRM, 36 of which
favored the opening of the border
crossing. Although some commenters
were opposed to the opening of a new
crossing in this area of the southwest
border, saying that it will decrease the
security of the border, other commenters
thought that the Boquillas crossing
would increase security in the region
and facilitate legitimate travel. Many
commenters were of the view that the
Boquillas border crossing would benefit
the region, including Big Bend National
Park and its visitors, as well as the
inhabitants of the village of Boquillas.
CBP did not receive any comments
regarding the proposed revised Class B
port of entry description.
After review of the comments, CBP
has concluded that the establishment of
the Boquillas border crossing is
consistent with the designation of the
area as a region of binational interest
and that the Boquillas border crossing is
needed to fill the long stretch of border
between Presidio and Del Rio where
there is currently no authorized
international border crossing. CBP has
also concluded that the addition of a
legal crossing facility at the site will
enhance security in the area by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:32 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
providing a way for legitimate travelers
to identify themselves to CBP and
comply with U.S. regulations.
Therefore, this final rule establishes the
Boquillas border crossing in Big Bend
National Park and revises the
description of a Class B port of entry.
This final rule addresses the relevant
comments CBP received regarding the
proposed crossing.
Background
On May 19, 2010, President Obama
´
and President Calderon of Mexico
issued a joint statement recognizing that
the Big Bend National Park and Rio
Grande Wild and Scenic River in the
United States, along with the Protected
˜
Areas of Maderas del Carmen, Canon de
´
Santa Elena, Ocampo, and Rıo Bravo del
Norte in Mexico together comprise one
of the largest and most significant
ecological systems in North America.
The Presidents expressed their support
for the designation of the region as a
natural area of binational interest, and
encouraged an increased level of
cooperation between the two countries.
Based on this joint Presidential
statement, the Commissioner of CBP
announced plans to establish a border
crossing in Big Bend National Park.
NPS, within the U.S. Department of
the Interior, has been working with CBP
on the border crossing. Efforts to
establish this new border crossing were
set in motion by discussions between
the White House, the U.S. Department
of Interior, and the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security. NPS planned to
construct a facility that could be used by
NPS as a visitor center and would
accommodate the infrastructure
necessary to operate a border crossing.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On October 28, 2011, CBP published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) in the Federal Register (76 FR
66862) proposing to establish a border
crossing in Big Bend National Park
where U.S. citizens and certain aliens
would be able to cross into the United
States. Before 2002, a border crossing,
called Boquillas, was open in the
national park. The NPRM stated that the
new border crossing would be located at
the site of the historic crossing and
would also be called the Boquillas
border crossing. The NPRM proposed to
designate the Boquillas border crossing
as a Class B port of entry and a Customs
station under the supervisory port of
entry of Presidio, Texas. Presidio, Texas
is a Customs port of entry listed in
section 101.3 of the CBP regulations (19
CFR 101.3). For ease of reference, the
NPRM referred to the proposed
Boquillas port of entry/Customs station
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76347
in this document as a border crossing;
this final rule does likewise. For
additional background information,
please see the preamble to the NPRM.
Traveler Processing at the Boquillas
Border Crossing
As described in the NPRM, the
Boquillas border crossing will service
only pedestrians visiting Big Bend
National Park and Mexican Protected
Areas—not import business. Therefore,
CBP will not process cargo, commercial
entries, or vehicles at Boquillas. Persons
using the Boquillas border crossing will
only be permitted to bring limited
merchandise into the United States; CBP
will only process items exempt from
duties and taxes under 19 CFR 10.151.
This provision generally covers
importations that do not exceed $200 in
value.1 All such items must comply
with all applicable regulations,
including all relevant Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service restrictions.
Persons using the Boquillas crossing
must also comply with Federal wildlife
protection laws and U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service wildlife import/export
regulations.
The Public Comment Period
The NPRM provided a 60-day public
comment period, which closed on
December 27, 2011. CBP received 47
comments in response to the proposed
rule. Thirty-six of these submissions
were in support of the proposal, and
included submissions from many
individuals who live in the vicinity of
Big Bend National Park as well as a
submission from an environmental
conservation association on behalf of
over 300,000 members. Eleven of the
submissions were opposed to the
proposal, and also included
submissions from individuals familiar
with the park, including a former
superintendent of Big Bend National
Park. The following section groups the
relevant comments, along with CBP’s
responses, by issue.
Discussion of Comments
A. General Security
Comments
Several commenters are opposed to
the opening of a new crossing in this
area of the southwest border, saying that
it will decrease the security of the
border. One commenter, who was the
superintendent of Big Bend National
Park from 1994 to 1999 and was familiar
1 Under 19 CFR 10.151, importations that do not
exceed $200 in value are generally exempt from
duty and taxes. Such merchandise shall be entered
under the informal entry procedures. See 19 CFR
128.24(d).
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
76348
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
with the crossing when it was open,
said that, while the crossing served its
purpose, illegal activity also took place.
The commenter is concerned that due to
the increase in illegal activity along the
southern border in recent years, drug
cartels will view the crossing as a ‘‘backdoor’’ to the United States. Another
commenter stated that illegal
immigration and smuggling of
contraband is at an all-time high in the
Border Patrol’s Big Bend Sector. Finally,
one commenter stated that the new
border crossing will present a risk to
park visitors and NPS rangers.
However, many commenters who
support opening the border crossing are
of the view that the border crossing will
maintain the security of the border
while providing a legal access point
between the United States and Mexico.
Many commenters believe that due to
the remoteness of the area, the Big Bend
region does not have the same security
risks as other parts of the southern
border. Several commenters believe that
the re-opening of the border crossing
with new security measures is likely to
increase security in the park, as those
participating in illegal activity along the
border are unlikely to attempt to enter
the United States at a monitored border
crossing. These commenters believe that
those seeking to cross illegally are more
likely to use any point along the many
miles of unmonitored border.
CBP Response
CBP disagrees that opening the
Boquillas border crossing will decrease
security in the area. The proposal to
open the Boquillas border crossing was
made after extensive CBP analysis and
consultation with our Mexican
counterparts. CBP firmly believes that
the addition of a legal crossing facility
at the site will enhance security in the
area by providing a way for legitimate
travelers to identify themselves to CBP
and comply with U.S. regulations. CBP
concurs with commenters who believe
that the border crossing will support
security efforts in Big Bend National
Park in that the enhanced security focus
at the border crossing will discourage
illegal activity in the vicinity of the
Boquillas border crossing.
Security concerns are of the utmost
importance, and CBP will take all
appropriate security measures at the
Boquillas border crossing and
surrounding areas. CBP continues to
take steps to increase security in the
area, as we have done all along our
borders. CBP already has a strong
security presence in place in the Border
Patrol’s Big Bend Sector, and there are
many layers of border security in place
to secure the Big Bend region. CBP
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:32 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
Border Patrol agents are assigned to the
park; NPS enforcement rangers patrol
the park; Border Patrol checkpoints are
staffed 24 hours per day, 7 days a week,
on all public roads leading from the
park; and Border Patrol agents patrol the
areas around the checkpoints and
highways leading from the area. The
audio and video surveillance at the new
border crossing will further enhance
security at this locale.
Regarding the statement that illegal
activity is at an all-time high, the
commenter does not reference specific
data, and CBP data does not support this
statement. According to CBP data, the
number of apprehensions in the Big
Bend Sector was the highest in the year
2000. Since 2001, CBP has increased the
number of Border Patrol agents in the
area, and there has been a decrease in
the number of apprehensions for illegal
activity in the area every year since
then.
crossing that is not staffed will provide
free access to anyone seeking to enter
the country and will cause an increase
in the number of illegal entries into the
country. One commenter stated that
scanning documents is insufficient to
keep terrorists, criminals, drugs, or
other contraband out of the country.
On the other hand, a few commenters
noted that CBP has used remote
technology to successfully secure
portions of the U.S.-Canada border.
Some commenters noted that those
using the Boquillas border crossing will
be required to present certain border
crossing documents and that state of the
art technology will be used to verify the
identities of travelers.
C. Use of Remote Technology
CBP Response
CBP believes that the technology
solution to be used at the Boquillas
border crossing will provide adequate
security. All travelers seeking admission
at the Boquillas border crossing will be
required to be admissible to the United
States and be in possession of a travel
document that complies with the
Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative
(WHTI). The WHTI document
requirements were implemented to
enhance security efforts at the borders
and to facilitate the movement of
legitimate travel within the Western
Hemisphere.2 Since the full
implementation of WHTI in June 2009,
CBP has the ability to validate, in real
time, a traveler’s documents to
determine the traveler’s true identity
and citizenship. The Boquillas border
crossing will provide a way for
legitimate travelers to identify
themselves to CBP and access this area.
As explained in the preamble of the
NPRM, CBP intends to use a
combination of staffing and technology
solutions to operate the border crossing.
Remote technology will assist CBP in
maintaining security and verifying the
identity of those entering the United
States, while also ensuring that they
possess proper documentation to do so.
Kiosks electronically connected to the
El Paso port of entry will enable CBP
officers in El Paso to remotely process
travelers at the Boquillas border
crossing.3 CBP officers in El Paso will be
in contact with Border Patrol agents
within the park, who will respond when
a physical inspection is required. CBP
officers will assist onsite as operational
needs dictate. CBP will process and
Comments
Several commenters are concerned
that the use of remote technology does
not provide adequate security at the
border. Some of these commenters
expressed concern that opening a
2 For more information on WHTI, see the WHTI
Land and Sea Final Rule, 73 FR 18384.
3 Although Boquillas would be under the
supervision of the Presidio port of entry, the kiosks
would be connected to the El Paso port of entry,
because El Paso has the appropriate facilities for
remote processing.
B. Opportunity for Travel
Comments
One commenter is opposed to
providing more opportunities for
travelers from Mexico to enter the
United States, and for this reason,
objects to the opening of the crossing.
Other commenters supporting the
opening of the Boquillas border crossing
stated that the border crossing will only
benefit law-abiding nationals of Mexico
and the United States.
CBP Response
The Boquillas border crossing does
not provide any greater opportunity to
enter the United States than any other
current Port of Entry. Most of the
travelers who would use the Boquillas
border crossing would be U.S. tourists
that visit the Park within the United
States, go over to Mexico to visit, and
then return to the United States. All
Mexican nationals seeking admission to
the United States at the Boquillas border
crossing will be required to meet all
admissibility and document
requirements and comply with all
relevant U.S. laws and regulations.
CBP supports facilitating legitimate
travel between the United States and
Mexico. CBP agrees that the border
crossing will only benefit law-abiding
travelers, including nationals of Mexico,
carrying proper documentation.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
clear all persons who use the Boquillas
border crossing to enter the United
States. CBP will install a 24-hour
surveillance camera at the Boquillas
crossing to monitor activity. The
cameras will be monitored 24 hours a
day at CBP’s Combined Area Security
Center and at the Alpine Border Patrol
Station. CBP Border Patrol agents or
NPS enforcement rangers stationed in
the area will be available to take any
necessary law enforcement measures.
The 24/7 surveillance at the Boquillas
crossing will further enhance security at
this locale. Additionally, the Boquillas
POE will only be open during daylight
hours. While open, the Boquillas facility
will also serve as a Park Service visitor’s
center and will be staffed by the Park
Service.
In addition, there are already many
layers of border security in place to
secure the Big Bend region: the CBP
Border Patrol agents assigned to the Big
Bend National Park Substation; the NPS
Enforcement Rangers who patrol the
park; Border Patrol checkpoints staffed
24/7 on all public roads leading from
Big Bend National Park; and Border
Patrol agents from the Alpine station
who patrol the areas around the
checkpoints and highways leading away
from the area. The 24/7 surveillance at
the Boquillas border crossing will
further enhance security in this locale.
Also, it is important to emphasize that
the Boquillas border crossing is
intended for pedestrian use only, as
there are no roads or bridges that cross
the international line at this location.
Security concerns related to vehicles
entering the United States will not
apply at the Boquillas border crossing.
CBP agrees fully with those
commenters who noted the successful
use of remote technology along the U.S.Canada border. CBP uses remote
technology at several northern border
crossings. This technology has been
very effective in verifying the identity
and citizenship of travelers and securing
the border.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
D. Border Patrol and NPS Rangers
Comments
Several commenters believe that NPS
rangers are not equipped to pursue
those who might use an unmanned
border crossing to enter the United
States illegally once they are in the
country. These commenters noted that
the terrain in the area is rugged,
provides cover, and is difficult to patrol.
Other commenters are concerned that
Border Patrol agents will not be able to
apprehend those who might use the
border crossing to enter the United
States illegally. Finally, one commenter
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:32 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
suggested that it is inappropriate to
open a border crossing utilizing remote
technology in an area that has seen
increased Border Patrol presence over
the past five years.
A few commenters writing in support
of the new border crossing noted that
there is a good working relationship
between CBP and NPS, and that Border
Patrol agents stationed in the park work
together with the NPS Enforcement
Rangers for the security of the park.
These commenters are of the view that
re-opening the border crossing would
facilitate communication between
Mexican residents and law enforcement
and U.S. law enforcement, which will
increase security in the region.
CBP Response
As mentioned above, CBP does not
believe the Boquillas border crossing
will cause an increase in the number of
illegal entries into the United States.
The security in place in Big Bend
National Park is already strong, and
includes CBP Border Patrol agents and
NPS enforcement rangers who patrol the
park and are familiar with the terrain.
To further combat the threat of illegal
immigration and smuggling of
contraband, CBP, in collaboration with
NPS, is in the process of constructing
new residences in Big Bend National
Park so that CBP may assign Border
Patrol agents to permanently work and
live in the park. Upon completion and
staffing of these homes, Border Patrol
will have the largest contingent of
agents ever assigned to Big Bend
National Park.
CBP does not agree with the comment
that the opening of a border crossing in
an area where there has been an
increased CBP presence is
inappropriate. To the contrary, CBP is of
the view that the increased CBP Border
Patrol presence has enhanced the
security of the area.
CBP agrees that there is a good
working relationship between Border
Patrol agents and NPS enforcement
rangers in the park. CBP also agrees that
facilitating communication between and
with law enforcement personnel
enhances security in the area.
E. Proximity to Other Border Crossings
Comments
One commenter objects to the opening
of an unstaffed crossing, because there
is a staffed crossing in Presidio, Texas,
which the commenter stated is not far
away.
Conversely, comments submitted in
support of the border crossing noted
that after the crossing was closed, the
closest legal border crossing was more
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76349
than 100 miles from the village of
Boquillas, Mexico. One commenter
stated that travel to the closest border
crossing from the Mexican side required
hours of travel on substandard roads,
and, as a result, families have become
disconnected and the local Texas
economy has been negatively affected.
Another commenter stated that someone
making a living selling inexpensive
crafts, as many of the residents of the
village of Boquillas do, cannot afford to
make a nearly 300 mile roundtrip
journey to the nearest legal border
crossing.
CBP Response
The closest legal border crossing west
of the site of the Boquillas border
crossing is Presidio, Texas. Presidio is
more than 150 miles from the Boquillas
site by river and more than 120 miles by
road on the U.S. side. On the Mexican
side, the town of Boquillas is very
isolated. By road, a traveler would have
to travel hundreds of miles south to the
interior of Mexico to connect to a
highway that would bring the traveler
back northwest to Presidio, Texas. To
the east of the Boquillas border crossing
site, the closest legal border crossing is
Del Rio, Texas. Del Rio is more than 250
miles from the Boquillas site by river
and more than 260 miles by road on the
U.S. side. On the Mexican side, by road,
a traveler would have to travel hundreds
of miles from the town of Boquillas
south into the interior of Mexico to
connect to a highway that would bring
the traveler back northeast to Del Rio,
Texas. Thus, CBP believes the Boquillas
border crossing is needed to fill the long
stretch of border between Presidio and
Del Rio where there is currently no
authorized international border
crossing.
F. Effect on the National Park and the
Village of Boquillas
Comments
A few commenters are opposed to
opening a border crossing in a national
park. One commenter said that there is
little in the village of Boquillas to attract
park visitors and little in Big Bend
National Park to attract the residents of
Boquillas, Mexico. Several commenters
suggested that increasing commerce to a
small Mexican village is an insufficient
reason to open a new border crossing.
However, many other commenters are
of the view the Boquillas border
crossing will benefit Big Bend National
Park and its visitors, as well as the
inhabitants of the village of Boquillas.
Some commenters noted that the
resources that make Big Bend National
Park worthy of protection are not
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
76350
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
confined solely within the bounds of the
National Park, but include surrounding
parks and protected areas in both the
United States and Mexico. They are of
the view that the legal crossing will
allow conservationists to collaborate
across the Rio Grande, permitting
greater protection efforts for plants and
wildlife. One commenter stated that
closing the crossing in 2002 had an
adverse impact on the ability to protect
natural resources, because the long
distances to the closest legal border
crossing have complicated cross-border
cooperation on issues ranging from
firefighting to removal of invasive
species.
Some commenters noted that the
history and culture of the United States
and Mexico are deeply intertwined in
this area, and, to fully appreciate this,
a visitor to the park needs to be able to
interact with those on the other side of
the border. Many commenters who are
familiar with the Boquillas border
crossing before it was closed in 2002
anticipate that the new border crossing
will open up many opportunities for
residents and travelers in the area. For
example, one commenter supports
reuniting the protected areas on either
side of the Rio Grande for such purposes
as observing nature and photography.
Another enjoyed crossing into Mexico
prior to the closing of the historic
crossing to paint landscapes. Other
commenters enjoyed visiting the village
of Boquillas for the cross-cultural
experience. A few commenters also
noted that when the crossing was
previously open, residents of the village
of Boquillas used the crossing to trade
goods, buy food, and visit relatives. One
commenter estimated that 40 percent of
the Rio Grande Village store’s revenue,
which lies within Big Bend National
Park, came from the residents of
Boquillas, Mexico, who crossed the
river to buy staples unavailable in their
village.
A few commenters suggested that
allowing for more legal, viable sources
of revenue for the residents of Boquillas,
who once depended heavily on tourism
and trade of handicrafts, will increase
security in the region around the
Boquillas border crossing. One
commenter stated that the border
crossing will allow the re-establishment
of commercial and cultural ties,
providing opportunities for people
across the border who currently have no
stake in the security of the border, and
creating an incentive to keep the
crossing legal and open. Additionally, a
few commenters believe that with a
legal border crossing, Border Patrol
agents will no longer need to spend time
and resources pursuing those who may
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:32 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
now be crossing illegally merely to buy
provisions to take home or those who
may have purchased a handicraft made
by the residents of Boquillas, Mexico.
CBP Response
CBP believes that the Boquillas border
crossing will benefit both sides of the
border, not only the village of Boquillas.
According to the U.S. Department of the
Interior, the opening of the Boquillas
border crossing will allow for the
development of a model of binational
cooperation for the conservation and
enjoyment of shared ecosystems for
current and future generations. With
more than 268 river miles and 3 million
acres of contiguous parks and protected
area on both sides of the border, the
border crossing should facilitate
research and conservation along the Rio
Grande within Big Bend National Park
and the Mexican Protected Areas.
NPS anticipates an increase in visitors
to Big Bend National Park due to the
new border crossing. NPS also
anticipates that visitors are likely to
increase the length of their stays in the
Big Bend region in order to take
advantage of the crossing. New visitors
and visitors staying longer will have a
positive impact on the local economy on
the U.S. side. Additionally, there are
also a number of river outfitters on the
U.S. side who can benefit from the new
border crossing by expanding their
services and businesses to include trips
not only down the Rio Grande but also
into Mexico. With the opening of the
Boquillas border crossing, river
outfitters will be able to lead tours into
Mexico and report back to CBP within
the park.
G. Lack of a Bridge
Comment
One commenter is concerned that
there will not be a bridge or other
infrastructure crossing the Rio Grande at
this site. The commenter stated that
when the border crossing was open
previously, those crossing the Rio
Grande did so in leaky rowboats, which
presented a potential hazard to
individuals as well as potential liability
to the park and the federal government.
CBP Response
According to NPS, numerous river
outfitters and travelers with their own
boats, such as kayaks or canoes, already
float the Rio Grande within Big Bend
National Park each year. All river
outfitters coming into the park are
required to meet safety standards and
training standards for employees. All
commercial boat operations at the
Boquillas border crossing will be
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
required to meet the same training and
safety standards as the current river
outfitters. Additionally, NPS requires
that all travelers with their own boats
register at park headquarters prior to
floating the river.
H. Maintenance of the Facility
Comment
One commenter is concerned that
there is insufficient maintenance staff in
the park to maintain this new structure
along with the many other existing
structures in the park.
CBP Response
NPS does not anticipate any issues
with maintenance of the facility. The
opening of the Boquillas border crossing
requires the construction of a small
facility and the installation of hardware
that meets the technical specifications
for land border crossings. NPS is
constructing a facility large enough to
house both a small visitor center and the
CBP inspection stations. The small
facility is designed to be both energy
efficient and low maintenance and will
have minimal impact on park
maintenance operations.
I. Opportunity for Comment
Comment
One commenter is of the view that the
opportunity CBP provided for public
comment was too late, as the project
was already underway. The commenter
also stated that the project is already
behind schedule and over budget.
CBP Response
Even though there had been
discussions about establishing a border
crossing in Big Bend National Park after
President Obama and President
´
Calderon issued their joint statement in
2010, CBP had not made a final
determination to proceed with the
project until an environmental
assessment was completed and public
comment was sought and reviewed. CBP
has carefully considered all the
comments received before reaching any
conclusions about whether to open the
border crossing. NPS has not indicated
any issues with funding the
construction of the facility.
J. Cost of Project
Comment
One commenter is concerned about
the cost of the project. The commenter
believes federal spending should be
reduced, and is concerned that this
project will increase the U.S. debt level.
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
CBP Response
The costs and benefits of this rule are
discussed in the section entitled,
‘‘Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulations and Regulatory
Review)’’ and elsewhere in this
document. CBP is of the view that the
societal benefits of this rule outweigh
the costs.
Revision of Class B Port of Entry
Description
In the NPRM, CBP also proposed to
update the description of a Class B port
of entry to reflect current border
crossing document requirements. The
Boquillas border crossing would fit
within the proposed new description of
a Class B port of entry. CBP received no
comments regarding the proposed
revision to the Class B port of entry
description. For a full explanation of the
Class B description amendment, please
see the section entitled ‘‘Proposed
Revision of Class B Port of Entry
Description’’ in the NPRM.
Adoption of Proposal
In view of the foregoing, and after
consideration of the comments received,
CBP has determined to adopt as final,
the proposed rule published in the
Federal Register, which establishes the
Boquillas border crossing and revises
the description of a Class B port of
entry.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Authority
These regulations are being amended
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 301, 6 U.S.C. 112,
203 and 211, 8 U.S.C. 1103, 8 U.S.C.
1185 note (section 7209 of Pub. L. 108–
458), and 19 U.S.C. 1, 58b, 66 and 1624.
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review)
This final rule is not an
‘‘economically significant’’ rulemaking
action under Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, because it will not result in the
expenditure of more than $100 million
in any one year. This final rule,
however, is a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866;
therefore, the Office of Management and
Budget has reviewed this rule.
The opening of the Boquillas border
crossing will entail constructing a small
inspection facility and installing
hardware that meets the technical
specifications for land ports of entry.
NPS is constructing a building large
enough to house both a small visitor
center and the CBP inspection station.
This construction is being funded
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:32 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
entirely by NPS and is expected to cost
$2.1 million,4 which accounts for
special construction needed to address
the remoteness of the facility. CBP will
be responsible for procuring and
installing all equipment needed for its
operation, which includes inspection
kiosks, surveillance equipment, and an
agricultural waste disposal system. This
equipment will cost $1,577,000 the first
year, which includes installation,
hardware, connectivity, and security.5
We estimate that the facility will cost
$200,000 each year for operation and
maintenance; an estimated $195,000
will be incurred by CBP and $5,000 by
NPS.6 NPS will also staff the facility
with a combination of paid seasonal and
volunteer personnel. NPS estimates that
0.5 paid Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs)
will be needed to staff the new facility
at a cost of approximately $17,800 per
year.7 The total cost of opening the
Boquillas border crossing is estimated to
be $3.7 million in the first year and
$217,800 in subsequent years, all of
which will be incurred by the U.S.
government.
NPS anticipates that 15,000 to 20,000
people will use the Boquillas border
crossing in the first year.8 Most of this
traffic is expected to be U.S. citizens
who will benefit from visiting the town
of Boquillas del Carmen on the Mexican
side of the border for food, souvenirs,
and a unique cultural experience. The
number of border crossers may grow
over time as NPS continues to work
with the Mexican government to
develop ecotourism and sports and
recreational opportunities. Because of
the absence of data on the number of
future border crossers and their
willingness to pay for these experiences,
we are not able to quantify the benefit
of the availability of these experiences
to the U.S. economy.
In addition to opening a new border
crossing at Boquillas, this final rule will
revise the definition of a Class B port of
4 Source: National Park Service Predesign
Study—Boquillas Crossing Visitor Contact/Border
Station. January 2011.
5 Source: CBP Office of Information Technology
estimate on March 4, 2011.
6 Sources: CBP Office of Information Technology
estimate on March 4, 2011 and National Park
Service estimate on March 24, 2011.
7 NPS assumes the facility will be staffed
seasonally for approximately half the year with a
GS–05 step 5 employee ($35,489 annual salary).
Email communication with Big Bend park
management staff on March 24, 2011. Salary
information: https://www.opm.gov/oca/11tables/
html/RUS.asp, accessed March 24, 2011.
Calculation: 0.5 FTE × $35,489 = $17,745, rounded
to $17,800. This calculation does not include
benefits, because the facility will be staffed by parttime seasonal employees.
8 Source: Telephone communication with Big
Bend park management staff on January 10, 2011.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76351
entry to make the admissibility
documents allowed at a Class B port of
entry consistent with WHTI. The costs
and benefits of obtaining WHTIcompliant documents were included in
the final rule establishing WHTI.9 This
final rule will not result in any
additional costs or benefits.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This section examines the impact of
the final rule on small entities as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 603), as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
and Fairness Act of 1996. A small entity
may be a small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated
business not dominant in its field that
qualifies as a small business per the
Small Business Act); a small not-forprofit organization; or a small
governmental jurisdiction (locality with
fewer than 50,000 people).
This final rule does not directly
impact small entities, because
individuals will be affected by the final
rule and individuals are not considered
small entities. In the NPRM, we stated
that we did not believe the rule would
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
and requested comments regarding that
assessment. As we did not receive any
comments with information that shows
that the rule will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, CBP certifies
that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 13132
The final rule will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, this final rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.
The National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969
DHS and CBP, in consultation with
NPS within the U.S. Department of
Interior, have been reviewing the
potential environmental and other
impacts of this proposed rule in
accordance with the National
9 The Regulatory Assessments for the April 2008
Final Rule for WHTI requirements in the land
environment can be found at www.regulations.gov,
document numbers USCBP–2007–0061–0615 and
USCBP–2007–0061–0616.
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
76352
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR part
1500), and DHS Management Directive
023–01, Environmental Planning
Program of April 19, 2006.
NPS prepared an environmental
assessment (EA) that examines the
effects on the natural and human
environment associated with the
proposed construction and operation of
a visitor station and establishment of a
Class B port of entry on the Rio Grande
between the United States and Mexico
within Big Bend National Park. The NPS
EA encompasses all components of the
Boquillas border crossing, including
CBP operations of the port of entry. On
June 28, 2011, NPS issued a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI)
concluding that the proposed activities
would not result in a significant impact
to the human and natural environment.
In accordance with NEPA, CBP has
carefully reviewed the EA developed by
NPS and has determined that it
considers all potential impacts of the
project accurately. Therefore, CBP is
adopting the EA developed by NPS and
is issuing a FONSI. These documents
will be posted on the CBP Web site at
www.cbp.gov and in the docket for this
rulemaking at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Signing Authority
The signing authority for amending
title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a),
because the establishment of this
Customs station is not within the
bounds of those regulations for which
the Secretary of the Treasury has
retained sole authority. Accordingly,
this final rule may be signed by the
Secretary of Homeland Security (or her
delegate).
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–31328 Filed 12–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
1. Revise the authority citation for part
100 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1185
note (section 7209 of Pub. L. 108–458); 8 CFR
part 2.
2. Amend § 100.4(a) as follows:
■ a. Revise the fifth sentence of
§ 100.4(a) to read as set forth below.
■ b. Under the heading ‘‘District No.
15—El Paso, Texas,’’ add the
subheading, ‘‘Class B’’ and add
‘‘Boquillas, TX’’ under the new ‘‘Class
B’’ heading.
■
§ 100.4
Field offices.
(a) * * * Class B means that the port
is a designated Port-of-Entry for aliens
who at the time of applying for
admission are exempt from document
requirements by § 212.1(c)(5) of this
chapter or who are lawfully in
possession of valid Permanent Resident
Cards, and nonimmigrant aliens who are
citizens of Canada or Bermuda or
nationals of Mexico and who at the time
of applying for admission are lawfully
in possession of all valid documents
required for admission as set forth in
§§ 212.1(a) and (c) and 235.1(d) and (e)
of this chapter and are admissible
without further arrival documentation
or immigration processing. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Title 19—Customs Duties
CHAPTER I—U.S. CUSTOMS AND
BORDER PROTECTION,
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE
TREASURY
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Part 208
Procedures for Asylum and
Withholding of Removal
CFR Correction
In Title 8 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, revised as of January 1,
2012, in § 208.24, on page 167, reinstate
paragraph (a) introductory text at the
beginning of the section and on page
168, reinstate paragraph (b) introductory
text before paragraph (1) to read as
follows:
§ 208.24 Termination of asylum or
withholding of removal or deportation.
(a) Termination of asylum by USCIS.
Except as provided in paragraph (e) of
this section, an asylum officer may
terminate a grant of asylum made under
the jurisdiction of USCIS if, following
an interview, the asylum officer
determines that:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Termination of withholding of
deportation or removal by USCIS.
Except as provided in paragraph (e) of
this section, an asylum officer may
terminate a grant of withholding of
deportation or removal made under the
jurisdiction of USCIS if the asylum
officer determines, following an
interview, that:
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–31270 Filed 12–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Part 209
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66,
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624,
1646a. Section 101.3 and 101.4 also issued
under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;
CFR Correction
■
Organization and functions
(Government agencies).
19 CFR Part 101
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
PART 100—STATEMENT OF
ORGANIZATION
corresponding Supervisory port of entry
column.
3. The authority citation for part 101,
and the sectional authority for §§ 101.3
and 101.4, continue to read as follows:
8 CFR Part 100
Customs duties and inspection,
Harbors, Organization and functions
(Government agencies), Seals and
insignia, Vessels.
*
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, we amend 8 CFR part 100 and
19 CFR part 101 as set forth below.
Jkt 229001
*
§ 101.4
Amendments to the Regulations
18:32 Dec 27, 2012
CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY
PART 101—GENERAL PROVISIONS
List of Subjects
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Title 8—Aliens and Nationality
*
*
*
[Amended]
4. In § 101.4(c), under the state of
Texas, add ‘‘Boquillas’’ in alphabetical
order to the Customs station column
and add ‘‘Presidio.’’ to the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Adjustment of Status of Refugees and
Aliens Granted Asylum
In Title 8 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, revised as of January 1,
2012, on page 175, in § 209.2, reinstate
paragraphs (b) through (f) to read as
follows:
§ 209.2 Adjustment of status of alien
granted asylum.
*
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
*
*
28DER1
*
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76346-76352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31328]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Part 100
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 101
[Docket No. USCBP-2011-0032; CBP Dec. No. 12-23]
RIN 1651-AA90
Opening of Boquillas Border Crossing and Update to the Class B
Port of Entry Description
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule establishes a border crossing in Big Bend National
Park called Boquillas and designates it as a Customs station for
customs purposes and a Class B port of entry (POE) for immigration
purposes. The Boquillas crossing will be situated between Presidio and
Del Rio, Texas. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the
National Park Service (NPS) are partnering on the construction of a
joint use facility in Big Bend National Park where the border crossing
will operate.
This rule also updates the description of a Class B port of entry
to reflect current border crossing documentation requirements.
DATES: Effective Date: January 28, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colleen Manaher, Director, Land Border
Integration, CBP Office of Field Operations, telephone 202-344-3003.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule establishes a border crossing in
Big Bend National Park called Boquillas and designates it as a Customs
station for customs purposes and a Class B port of entry for
immigration purposes.
[[Page 76347]]
Executive Summary
In 2010, the Presidents of the United States and Mexico issued a
joint statement supporting the designation of a region of protected
areas on both sides of the Rio Grande, including Big Bend National
Park, as a region of binational interest. In support of this, CBP began
working with the National Park Service to establish a border crossing
to allow authorized travel between the areas in the United States and
Mexico. On October 28, 2011, CBP published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register (76 FR 66862), which
solicited public comment. The NPRM proposed to establish a Class B port
of entry/Customs station in Big Bend National Park called Boquillas.
Boquillas was proposed to be a Class B port of entry for immigration
purposes under 8 CFR 100.4 and a Customs station for customs purposes
in 19 CFR 101.4. In the NPRM and in this final rule, the Class B port
of entry/Customs station is referred to as a border crossing. The NPRM
also proposed to update the description of a Class B port of entry in 8
CFR 101.4 to reflect current border crossing document requirements. The
Boquillas border crossing will service only pedestrians visiting Big
Bend National Park and Mexican Protected Areas; CBP will not process
cargo, commercial entries, or vehicles at Boquillas.
CBP received 47 comments in response to the NPRM, 36 of which
favored the opening of the border crossing. Although some commenters
were opposed to the opening of a new crossing in this area of the
southwest border, saying that it will decrease the security of the
border, other commenters thought that the Boquillas crossing would
increase security in the region and facilitate legitimate travel. Many
commenters were of the view that the Boquillas border crossing would
benefit the region, including Big Bend National Park and its visitors,
as well as the inhabitants of the village of Boquillas. CBP did not
receive any comments regarding the proposed revised Class B port of
entry description.
After review of the comments, CBP has concluded that the
establishment of the Boquillas border crossing is consistent with the
designation of the area as a region of binational interest and that the
Boquillas border crossing is needed to fill the long stretch of border
between Presidio and Del Rio where there is currently no authorized
international border crossing. CBP has also concluded that the addition
of a legal crossing facility at the site will enhance security in the
area by providing a way for legitimate travelers to identify themselves
to CBP and comply with U.S. regulations. Therefore, this final rule
establishes the Boquillas border crossing in Big Bend National Park and
revises the description of a Class B port of entry. This final rule
addresses the relevant comments CBP received regarding the proposed
crossing.
Background
On May 19, 2010, President Obama and President Calder[oacute]n of
Mexico issued a joint statement recognizing that the Big Bend National
Park and Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River in the United States, along
with the Protected Areas of Maderas del Carmen, Ca[ntilde]on de Santa
Elena, Ocampo, and R[iacute]o Bravo del Norte in Mexico together
comprise one of the largest and most significant ecological systems in
North America. The Presidents expressed their support for the
designation of the region as a natural area of binational interest, and
encouraged an increased level of cooperation between the two countries.
Based on this joint Presidential statement, the Commissioner of CBP
announced plans to establish a border crossing in Big Bend National
Park.
NPS, within the U.S. Department of the Interior, has been working
with CBP on the border crossing. Efforts to establish this new border
crossing were set in motion by discussions between the White House, the
U.S. Department of Interior, and the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security. NPS planned to construct a facility that could be used by NPS
as a visitor center and would accommodate the infrastructure necessary
to operate a border crossing.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On October 28, 2011, CBP published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) in the Federal Register (76 FR 66862) proposing to establish a
border crossing in Big Bend National Park where U.S. citizens and
certain aliens would be able to cross into the United States. Before
2002, a border crossing, called Boquillas, was open in the national
park. The NPRM stated that the new border crossing would be located at
the site of the historic crossing and would also be called the
Boquillas border crossing. The NPRM proposed to designate the Boquillas
border crossing as a Class B port of entry and a Customs station under
the supervisory port of entry of Presidio, Texas. Presidio, Texas is a
Customs port of entry listed in section 101.3 of the CBP regulations
(19 CFR 101.3). For ease of reference, the NPRM referred to the
proposed Boquillas port of entry/Customs station in this document as a
border crossing; this final rule does likewise. For additional
background information, please see the preamble to the NPRM.
Traveler Processing at the Boquillas Border Crossing
As described in the NPRM, the Boquillas border crossing will
service only pedestrians visiting Big Bend National Park and Mexican
Protected Areas--not import business. Therefore, CBP will not process
cargo, commercial entries, or vehicles at Boquillas. Persons using the
Boquillas border crossing will only be permitted to bring limited
merchandise into the United States; CBP will only process items exempt
from duties and taxes under 19 CFR 10.151. This provision generally
covers importations that do not exceed $200 in value.\1\ All such items
must comply with all applicable regulations, including all relevant
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service restrictions. Persons using
the Boquillas crossing must also comply with Federal wildlife
protection laws and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wildlife import/
export regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Under 19 CFR 10.151, importations that do not exceed $200 in
value are generally exempt from duty and taxes. Such merchandise
shall be entered under the informal entry procedures. See 19 CFR
128.24(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Public Comment Period
The NPRM provided a 60-day public comment period, which closed on
December 27, 2011. CBP received 47 comments in response to the proposed
rule. Thirty-six of these submissions were in support of the proposal,
and included submissions from many individuals who live in the vicinity
of Big Bend National Park as well as a submission from an environmental
conservation association on behalf of over 300,000 members. Eleven of
the submissions were opposed to the proposal, and also included
submissions from individuals familiar with the park, including a former
superintendent of Big Bend National Park. The following section groups
the relevant comments, along with CBP's responses, by issue.
Discussion of Comments
A. General Security
Comments
Several commenters are opposed to the opening of a new crossing in
this area of the southwest border, saying that it will decrease the
security of the border. One commenter, who was the superintendent of
Big Bend National Park from 1994 to 1999 and was familiar
[[Page 76348]]
with the crossing when it was open, said that, while the crossing
served its purpose, illegal activity also took place. The commenter is
concerned that due to the increase in illegal activity along the
southern border in recent years, drug cartels will view the crossing as
a ``back-door'' to the United States. Another commenter stated that
illegal immigration and smuggling of contraband is at an all-time high
in the Border Patrol's Big Bend Sector. Finally, one commenter stated
that the new border crossing will present a risk to park visitors and
NPS rangers.
However, many commenters who support opening the border crossing
are of the view that the border crossing will maintain the security of
the border while providing a legal access point between the United
States and Mexico. Many commenters believe that due to the remoteness
of the area, the Big Bend region does not have the same security risks
as other parts of the southern border. Several commenters believe that
the re-opening of the border crossing with new security measures is
likely to increase security in the park, as those participating in
illegal activity along the border are unlikely to attempt to enter the
United States at a monitored border crossing. These commenters believe
that those seeking to cross illegally are more likely to use any point
along the many miles of unmonitored border.
CBP Response
CBP disagrees that opening the Boquillas border crossing will
decrease security in the area. The proposal to open the Boquillas
border crossing was made after extensive CBP analysis and consultation
with our Mexican counterparts. CBP firmly believes that the addition of
a legal crossing facility at the site will enhance security in the area
by providing a way for legitimate travelers to identify themselves to
CBP and comply with U.S. regulations. CBP concurs with commenters who
believe that the border crossing will support security efforts in Big
Bend National Park in that the enhanced security focus at the border
crossing will discourage illegal activity in the vicinity of the
Boquillas border crossing.
Security concerns are of the utmost importance, and CBP will take
all appropriate security measures at the Boquillas border crossing and
surrounding areas. CBP continues to take steps to increase security in
the area, as we have done all along our borders. CBP already has a
strong security presence in place in the Border Patrol's Big Bend
Sector, and there are many layers of border security in place to secure
the Big Bend region. CBP Border Patrol agents are assigned to the park;
NPS enforcement rangers patrol the park; Border Patrol checkpoints are
staffed 24 hours per day, 7 days a week, on all public roads leading
from the park; and Border Patrol agents patrol the areas around the
checkpoints and highways leading from the area. The audio and video
surveillance at the new border crossing will further enhance security
at this locale.
Regarding the statement that illegal activity is at an all-time
high, the commenter does not reference specific data, and CBP data does
not support this statement. According to CBP data, the number of
apprehensions in the Big Bend Sector was the highest in the year 2000.
Since 2001, CBP has increased the number of Border Patrol agents in the
area, and there has been a decrease in the number of apprehensions for
illegal activity in the area every year since then.
B. Opportunity for Travel
Comments
One commenter is opposed to providing more opportunities for
travelers from Mexico to enter the United States, and for this reason,
objects to the opening of the crossing. Other commenters supporting the
opening of the Boquillas border crossing stated that the border
crossing will only benefit law-abiding nationals of Mexico and the
United States.
CBP Response
The Boquillas border crossing does not provide any greater
opportunity to enter the United States than any other current Port of
Entry. Most of the travelers who would use the Boquillas border
crossing would be U.S. tourists that visit the Park within the United
States, go over to Mexico to visit, and then return to the United
States. All Mexican nationals seeking admission to the United States at
the Boquillas border crossing will be required to meet all
admissibility and document requirements and comply with all relevant
U.S. laws and regulations.
CBP supports facilitating legitimate travel between the United
States and Mexico. CBP agrees that the border crossing will only
benefit law-abiding travelers, including nationals of Mexico, carrying
proper documentation.
C. Use of Remote Technology
Comments
Several commenters are concerned that the use of remote technology
does not provide adequate security at the border. Some of these
commenters expressed concern that opening a crossing that is not
staffed will provide free access to anyone seeking to enter the country
and will cause an increase in the number of illegal entries into the
country. One commenter stated that scanning documents is insufficient
to keep terrorists, criminals, drugs, or other contraband out of the
country.
On the other hand, a few commenters noted that CBP has used remote
technology to successfully secure portions of the U.S.-Canada border.
Some commenters noted that those using the Boquillas border crossing
will be required to present certain border crossing documents and that
state of the art technology will be used to verify the identities of
travelers.
CBP Response
CBP believes that the technology solution to be used at the
Boquillas border crossing will provide adequate security. All travelers
seeking admission at the Boquillas border crossing will be required to
be admissible to the United States and be in possession of a travel
document that complies with the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative
(WHTI). The WHTI document requirements were implemented to enhance
security efforts at the borders and to facilitate the movement of
legitimate travel within the Western Hemisphere.\2\ Since the full
implementation of WHTI in June 2009, CBP has the ability to validate,
in real time, a traveler's documents to determine the traveler's true
identity and citizenship. The Boquillas border crossing will provide a
way for legitimate travelers to identify themselves to CBP and access
this area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For more information on WHTI, see the WHTI Land and Sea
Final Rule, 73 FR 18384.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained in the preamble of the NPRM, CBP intends to use a
combination of staffing and technology solutions to operate the border
crossing. Remote technology will assist CBP in maintaining security and
verifying the identity of those entering the United States, while also
ensuring that they possess proper documentation to do so. Kiosks
electronically connected to the El Paso port of entry will enable CBP
officers in El Paso to remotely process travelers at the Boquillas
border crossing.\3\ CBP officers in El Paso will be in contact with
Border Patrol agents within the park, who will respond when a physical
inspection is required. CBP officers will assist onsite as operational
needs dictate. CBP will process and
[[Page 76349]]
clear all persons who use the Boquillas border crossing to enter the
United States. CBP will install a 24-hour surveillance camera at the
Boquillas crossing to monitor activity. The cameras will be monitored
24 hours a day at CBP's Combined Area Security Center and at the Alpine
Border Patrol Station. CBP Border Patrol agents or NPS enforcement
rangers stationed in the area will be available to take any necessary
law enforcement measures. The 24/7 surveillance at the Boquillas
crossing will further enhance security at this locale. Additionally,
the Boquillas POE will only be open during daylight hours. While open,
the Boquillas facility will also serve as a Park Service visitor's
center and will be staffed by the Park Service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Although Boquillas would be under the supervision of the
Presidio port of entry, the kiosks would be connected to the El Paso
port of entry, because El Paso has the appropriate facilities for
remote processing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, there are already many layers of border security in
place to secure the Big Bend region: the CBP Border Patrol agents
assigned to the Big Bend National Park Substation; the NPS Enforcement
Rangers who patrol the park; Border Patrol checkpoints staffed 24/7 on
all public roads leading from Big Bend National Park; and Border Patrol
agents from the Alpine station who patrol the areas around the
checkpoints and highways leading away from the area. The 24/7
surveillance at the Boquillas border crossing will further enhance
security in this locale. Also, it is important to emphasize that the
Boquillas border crossing is intended for pedestrian use only, as there
are no roads or bridges that cross the international line at this
location. Security concerns related to vehicles entering the United
States will not apply at the Boquillas border crossing.
CBP agrees fully with those commenters who noted the successful use
of remote technology along the U.S.-Canada border. CBP uses remote
technology at several northern border crossings. This technology has
been very effective in verifying the identity and citizenship of
travelers and securing the border.
D. Border Patrol and NPS Rangers
Comments
Several commenters believe that NPS rangers are not equipped to
pursue those who might use an unmanned border crossing to enter the
United States illegally once they are in the country. These commenters
noted that the terrain in the area is rugged, provides cover, and is
difficult to patrol. Other commenters are concerned that Border Patrol
agents will not be able to apprehend those who might use the border
crossing to enter the United States illegally. Finally, one commenter
suggested that it is inappropriate to open a border crossing utilizing
remote technology in an area that has seen increased Border Patrol
presence over the past five years.
A few commenters writing in support of the new border crossing
noted that there is a good working relationship between CBP and NPS,
and that Border Patrol agents stationed in the park work together with
the NPS Enforcement Rangers for the security of the park. These
commenters are of the view that re-opening the border crossing would
facilitate communication between Mexican residents and law enforcement
and U.S. law enforcement, which will increase security in the region.
CBP Response
As mentioned above, CBP does not believe the Boquillas border
crossing will cause an increase in the number of illegal entries into
the United States. The security in place in Big Bend National Park is
already strong, and includes CBP Border Patrol agents and NPS
enforcement rangers who patrol the park and are familiar with the
terrain. To further combat the threat of illegal immigration and
smuggling of contraband, CBP, in collaboration with NPS, is in the
process of constructing new residences in Big Bend National Park so
that CBP may assign Border Patrol agents to permanently work and live
in the park. Upon completion and staffing of these homes, Border Patrol
will have the largest contingent of agents ever assigned to Big Bend
National Park.
CBP does not agree with the comment that the opening of a border
crossing in an area where there has been an increased CBP presence is
inappropriate. To the contrary, CBP is of the view that the increased
CBP Border Patrol presence has enhanced the security of the area.
CBP agrees that there is a good working relationship between Border
Patrol agents and NPS enforcement rangers in the park. CBP also agrees
that facilitating communication between and with law enforcement
personnel enhances security in the area.
E. Proximity to Other Border Crossings
Comments
One commenter objects to the opening of an unstaffed crossing,
because there is a staffed crossing in Presidio, Texas, which the
commenter stated is not far away.
Conversely, comments submitted in support of the border crossing
noted that after the crossing was closed, the closest legal border
crossing was more than 100 miles from the village of Boquillas, Mexico.
One commenter stated that travel to the closest border crossing from
the Mexican side required hours of travel on substandard roads, and, as
a result, families have become disconnected and the local Texas economy
has been negatively affected. Another commenter stated that someone
making a living selling inexpensive crafts, as many of the residents of
the village of Boquillas do, cannot afford to make a nearly 300 mile
roundtrip journey to the nearest legal border crossing.
CBP Response
The closest legal border crossing west of the site of the Boquillas
border crossing is Presidio, Texas. Presidio is more than 150 miles
from the Boquillas site by river and more than 120 miles by road on the
U.S. side. On the Mexican side, the town of Boquillas is very isolated.
By road, a traveler would have to travel hundreds of miles south to the
interior of Mexico to connect to a highway that would bring the
traveler back northwest to Presidio, Texas. To the east of the
Boquillas border crossing site, the closest legal border crossing is
Del Rio, Texas. Del Rio is more than 250 miles from the Boquillas site
by river and more than 260 miles by road on the U.S. side. On the
Mexican side, by road, a traveler would have to travel hundreds of
miles from the town of Boquillas south into the interior of Mexico to
connect to a highway that would bring the traveler back northeast to
Del Rio, Texas. Thus, CBP believes the Boquillas border crossing is
needed to fill the long stretch of border between Presidio and Del Rio
where there is currently no authorized international border crossing.
F. Effect on the National Park and the Village of Boquillas
Comments
A few commenters are opposed to opening a border crossing in a
national park. One commenter said that there is little in the village
of Boquillas to attract park visitors and little in Big Bend National
Park to attract the residents of Boquillas, Mexico. Several commenters
suggested that increasing commerce to a small Mexican village is an
insufficient reason to open a new border crossing.
However, many other commenters are of the view the Boquillas border
crossing will benefit Big Bend National Park and its visitors, as well
as the inhabitants of the village of Boquillas. Some commenters noted
that the resources that make Big Bend National Park worthy of
protection are not
[[Page 76350]]
confined solely within the bounds of the National Park, but include
surrounding parks and protected areas in both the United States and
Mexico. They are of the view that the legal crossing will allow
conservationists to collaborate across the Rio Grande, permitting
greater protection efforts for plants and wildlife. One commenter
stated that closing the crossing in 2002 had an adverse impact on the
ability to protect natural resources, because the long distances to the
closest legal border crossing have complicated cross-border cooperation
on issues ranging from firefighting to removal of invasive species.
Some commenters noted that the history and culture of the United
States and Mexico are deeply intertwined in this area, and, to fully
appreciate this, a visitor to the park needs to be able to interact
with those on the other side of the border. Many commenters who are
familiar with the Boquillas border crossing before it was closed in
2002 anticipate that the new border crossing will open up many
opportunities for residents and travelers in the area. For example, one
commenter supports reuniting the protected areas on either side of the
Rio Grande for such purposes as observing nature and photography.
Another enjoyed crossing into Mexico prior to the closing of the
historic crossing to paint landscapes. Other commenters enjoyed
visiting the village of Boquillas for the cross-cultural experience. A
few commenters also noted that when the crossing was previously open,
residents of the village of Boquillas used the crossing to trade goods,
buy food, and visit relatives. One commenter estimated that 40 percent
of the Rio Grande Village store's revenue, which lies within Big Bend
National Park, came from the residents of Boquillas, Mexico, who
crossed the river to buy staples unavailable in their village.
A few commenters suggested that allowing for more legal, viable
sources of revenue for the residents of Boquillas, who once depended
heavily on tourism and trade of handicrafts, will increase security in
the region around the Boquillas border crossing. One commenter stated
that the border crossing will allow the re-establishment of commercial
and cultural ties, providing opportunities for people across the border
who currently have no stake in the security of the border, and creating
an incentive to keep the crossing legal and open. Additionally, a few
commenters believe that with a legal border crossing, Border Patrol
agents will no longer need to spend time and resources pursuing those
who may now be crossing illegally merely to buy provisions to take home
or those who may have purchased a handicraft made by the residents of
Boquillas, Mexico.
CBP Response
CBP believes that the Boquillas border crossing will benefit both
sides of the border, not only the village of Boquillas. According to
the U.S. Department of the Interior, the opening of the Boquillas
border crossing will allow for the development of a model of binational
cooperation for the conservation and enjoyment of shared ecosystems for
current and future generations. With more than 268 river miles and 3
million acres of contiguous parks and protected area on both sides of
the border, the border crossing should facilitate research and
conservation along the Rio Grande within Big Bend National Park and the
Mexican Protected Areas.
NPS anticipates an increase in visitors to Big Bend National Park
due to the new border crossing. NPS also anticipates that visitors are
likely to increase the length of their stays in the Big Bend region in
order to take advantage of the crossing. New visitors and visitors
staying longer will have a positive impact on the local economy on the
U.S. side. Additionally, there are also a number of river outfitters on
the U.S. side who can benefit from the new border crossing by expanding
their services and businesses to include trips not only down the Rio
Grande but also into Mexico. With the opening of the Boquillas border
crossing, river outfitters will be able to lead tours into Mexico and
report back to CBP within the park.
G. Lack of a Bridge
Comment
One commenter is concerned that there will not be a bridge or other
infrastructure crossing the Rio Grande at this site. The commenter
stated that when the border crossing was open previously, those
crossing the Rio Grande did so in leaky rowboats, which presented a
potential hazard to individuals as well as potential liability to the
park and the federal government.
CBP Response
According to NPS, numerous river outfitters and travelers with
their own boats, such as kayaks or canoes, already float the Rio Grande
within Big Bend National Park each year. All river outfitters coming
into the park are required to meet safety standards and training
standards for employees. All commercial boat operations at the
Boquillas border crossing will be required to meet the same training
and safety standards as the current river outfitters. Additionally, NPS
requires that all travelers with their own boats register at park
headquarters prior to floating the river.
H. Maintenance of the Facility
Comment
One commenter is concerned that there is insufficient maintenance
staff in the park to maintain this new structure along with the many
other existing structures in the park.
CBP Response
NPS does not anticipate any issues with maintenance of the
facility. The opening of the Boquillas border crossing requires the
construction of a small facility and the installation of hardware that
meets the technical specifications for land border crossings. NPS is
constructing a facility large enough to house both a small visitor
center and the CBP inspection stations. The small facility is designed
to be both energy efficient and low maintenance and will have minimal
impact on park maintenance operations.
I. Opportunity for Comment
Comment
One commenter is of the view that the opportunity CBP provided for
public comment was too late, as the project was already underway. The
commenter also stated that the project is already behind schedule and
over budget.
CBP Response
Even though there had been discussions about establishing a border
crossing in Big Bend National Park after President Obama and President
Calder[oacute]n issued their joint statement in 2010, CBP had not made
a final determination to proceed with the project until an
environmental assessment was completed and public comment was sought
and reviewed. CBP has carefully considered all the comments received
before reaching any conclusions about whether to open the border
crossing. NPS has not indicated any issues with funding the
construction of the facility.
J. Cost of Project
Comment
One commenter is concerned about the cost of the project. The
commenter believes federal spending should be reduced, and is concerned
that this project will increase the U.S. debt level.
[[Page 76351]]
CBP Response
The costs and benefits of this rule are discussed in the section
entitled, ``Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and
13563 (Improving Regulations and Regulatory Review)'' and elsewhere in
this document. CBP is of the view that the societal benefits of this
rule outweigh the costs.
Revision of Class B Port of Entry Description
In the NPRM, CBP also proposed to update the description of a Class
B port of entry to reflect current border crossing document
requirements. The Boquillas border crossing would fit within the
proposed new description of a Class B port of entry. CBP received no
comments regarding the proposed revision to the Class B port of entry
description. For a full explanation of the Class B description
amendment, please see the section entitled ``Proposed Revision of Class
B Port of Entry Description'' in the NPRM.
Adoption of Proposal
In view of the foregoing, and after consideration of the comments
received, CBP has determined to adopt as final, the proposed rule
published in the Federal Register, which establishes the Boquillas
border crossing and revises the description of a Class B port of entry.
Authority
These regulations are being amended pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 301, 6
U.S.C. 112, 203 and 211, 8 U.S.C. 1103, 8 U.S.C. 1185 note (section
7209 of Pub. L. 108-458), and 19 U.S.C. 1, 58b, 66 and 1624.
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review)
This final rule is not an ``economically significant'' rulemaking
action under Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive Order
13563, because it will not result in the expenditure of more than $100
million in any one year. This final rule, however, is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866; therefore, the Office of
Management and Budget has reviewed this rule.
The opening of the Boquillas border crossing will entail
constructing a small inspection facility and installing hardware that
meets the technical specifications for land ports of entry. NPS is
constructing a building large enough to house both a small visitor
center and the CBP inspection station. This construction is being
funded entirely by NPS and is expected to cost $2.1 million,\4\ which
accounts for special construction needed to address the remoteness of
the facility. CBP will be responsible for procuring and installing all
equipment needed for its operation, which includes inspection kiosks,
surveillance equipment, and an agricultural waste disposal system. This
equipment will cost $1,577,000 the first year, which includes
installation, hardware, connectivity, and security.\5\ We estimate that
the facility will cost $200,000 each year for operation and
maintenance; an estimated $195,000 will be incurred by CBP and $5,000
by NPS.\6\ NPS will also staff the facility with a combination of paid
seasonal and volunteer personnel. NPS estimates that 0.5 paid Full-Time
Equivalents (FTEs) will be needed to staff the new facility at a cost
of approximately $17,800 per year.\7\ The total cost of opening the
Boquillas border crossing is estimated to be $3.7 million in the first
year and $217,800 in subsequent years, all of which will be incurred by
the U.S. government.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Source: National Park Service Predesign Study--Boquillas
Crossing Visitor Contact/Border Station. January 2011.
\5\ Source: CBP Office of Information Technology estimate on
March 4, 2011.
\6\ Sources: CBP Office of Information Technology estimate on
March 4, 2011 and National Park Service estimate on March 24, 2011.
\7\ NPS assumes the facility will be staffed seasonally for
approximately half the year with a GS-05 step 5 employee ($35,489
annual salary). Email communication with Big Bend park management
staff on March 24, 2011. Salary information: https://www.opm.gov/oca/11tables/html/RUS.asp, accessed March 24, 2011. Calculation: 0.5 FTE
x $35,489 = $17,745, rounded to $17,800. This calculation does not
include benefits, because the facility will be staffed by part-time
seasonal employees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPS anticipates that 15,000 to 20,000 people will use the Boquillas
border crossing in the first year.\8\ Most of this traffic is expected
to be U.S. citizens who will benefit from visiting the town of
Boquillas del Carmen on the Mexican side of the border for food,
souvenirs, and a unique cultural experience. The number of border
crossers may grow over time as NPS continues to work with the Mexican
government to develop ecotourism and sports and recreational
opportunities. Because of the absence of data on the number of future
border crossers and their willingness to pay for these experiences, we
are not able to quantify the benefit of the availability of these
experiences to the U.S. economy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Source: Telephone communication with Big Bend park
management staff on January 10, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to opening a new border crossing at Boquillas, this
final rule will revise the definition of a Class B port of entry to
make the admissibility documents allowed at a Class B port of entry
consistent with WHTI. The costs and benefits of obtaining WHTI-
compliant documents were included in the final rule establishing
WHTI.\9\ This final rule will not result in any additional costs or
benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The Regulatory Assessments for the April 2008 Final Rule for
WHTI requirements in the land environment can be found at
www.regulations.gov, document numbers USCBP-2007-0061-0615 and
USCBP-2007-0061-0616.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This section examines the impact of the final rule on small
entities as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603),
as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness
Act of 1996. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field
that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act); a small
not-for-profit organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction
(locality with fewer than 50,000 people).
This final rule does not directly impact small entities, because
individuals will be affected by the final rule and individuals are not
considered small entities. In the NPRM, we stated that we did not
believe the rule would have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities and requested comments regarding
that assessment. As we did not receive any comments with information
that shows that the rule will have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, CBP certifies that this final
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Executive Order 13132
The final rule will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6
of Executive Order 13132, this final rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement.
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
DHS and CBP, in consultation with NPS within the U.S. Department of
Interior, have been reviewing the potential environmental and other
impacts of this proposed rule in accordance with the National
[[Page 76352]]
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the
regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR part 1500),
and DHS Management Directive 023-01, Environmental Planning Program of
April 19, 2006.
NPS prepared an environmental assessment (EA) that examines the
effects on the natural and human environment associated with the
proposed construction and operation of a visitor station and
establishment of a Class B port of entry on the Rio Grande between the
United States and Mexico within Big Bend National Park. The NPS EA
encompasses all components of the Boquillas border crossing, including
CBP operations of the port of entry. On June 28, 2011, NPS issued a
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) concluding that the proposed
activities would not result in a significant impact to the human and
natural environment.
In accordance with NEPA, CBP has carefully reviewed the EA
developed by NPS and has determined that it considers all potential
impacts of the project accurately. Therefore, CBP is adopting the EA
developed by NPS and is issuing a FONSI. These documents will be posted
on the CBP Web site at www.cbp.gov and in the docket for this
rulemaking at https://www.regulations.gov.
Signing Authority
The signing authority for amending title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a), because the establishment of
this Customs station is not within the bounds of those regulations for
which the Secretary of the Treasury has retained sole authority.
Accordingly, this final rule may be signed by the Secretary of Homeland
Security (or her delegate).
List of Subjects
8 CFR Part 100
Organization and functions (Government agencies).
19 CFR Part 101
Customs duties and inspection, Harbors, Organization and functions
(Government agencies), Seals and insignia, Vessels.
Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons stated in the preamble, we amend 8 CFR part 100 and
19 CFR part 101 as set forth below.
Title 8--Aliens and Nationality
CHAPTER I--DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
PART 100--STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 100 to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1185 note (section 7209 of
Pub. L. 108-458); 8 CFR part 2.
0
2. Amend Sec. 100.4(a) as follows:
0
a. Revise the fifth sentence of Sec. 100.4(a) to read as set forth
below.
0
b. Under the heading ``District No. 15--El Paso, Texas,'' add the
subheading, ``Class B'' and add ``Boquillas, TX'' under the new ``Class
B'' heading.
Sec. 100.4 Field offices.
(a) * * * Class B means that the port is a designated Port-of-Entry
for aliens who at the time of applying for admission are exempt from
document requirements by Sec. 212.1(c)(5) of this chapter or who are
lawfully in possession of valid Permanent Resident Cards, and
nonimmigrant aliens who are citizens of Canada or Bermuda or nationals
of Mexico and who at the time of applying for admission are lawfully in
possession of all valid documents required for admission as set forth
in Sec. Sec. 212.1(a) and (c) and 235.1(d) and (e) of this chapter and
are admissible without further arrival documentation or immigration
processing. * * *
* * * * *
Title 19--Customs Duties
CHAPTER I--U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
PART 101--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
3. The authority citation for part 101, and the sectional authority for
Sec. Sec. 101.3 and 101.4, continue to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, 1202 (General Note
3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624,
1646a. Section 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and
58b;
* * * * *
Sec. 101.4 [Amended]
4. In Sec. 101.4(c), under the state of Texas, add ``Boquillas''
in alphabetical order to the Customs station column and add
``Presidio.'' to the corresponding Supervisory port of entry column.
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-31328 Filed 12-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P