Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Prevention of Significant Deterioration Greenhouse Gas Tailoring and Biomass Deferral Rule, 76430-76434 [2012-31191]
Download as PDF
76430
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
addition, this proposed 2006 PM2.5
clean NAAQS data determination for
the Milwaukee-Racine, Wisconsin area
does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because
the SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the state, and
EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Particulate Matter,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 17, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2012–31290 Filed 12–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0467; EPA–R05–
OAR–2012–0538; FRL–9765–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Greenhouse Gas
Tailoring and Biomass Deferral Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:23 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted
by the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources (WDNR) to EPA on May 4,
2011, June 20, 2012, and September 28,
2012. The proposed revisions modify
Wisconsin’s Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) program to establish
appropriate emission thresholds for
determining which new stationary
sources and modification projects
become subject to Wisconsin’s PSD
permitting requirements for their
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Additionally, these revisions propose to
defer until July 21, 2014, the application
of the PSD permitting requirements to
biogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions
from bioenergy and other biogenic
stationary sources in the State of
Wisconsin. EPA is proposing approval
of Wisconsin’s revisions because the
Agency has made the preliminary
determination that these revisions are in
accordance with the Clean Air Act
(CAA) and EPA regulations regarding
PSD permitting for GHGs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2011–0467, or EPA–R05–OAR–
2012–0538 by one of the following
methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: damico.genevieve@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312)692–2450.
4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air
Permits Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico,
Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID Nos. EPA–R05–OAR–2011–
0467, or EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0538.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Danny
Marcus, Environmental Engineer, at
(312) 353–8781 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Danny Marcus, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 353–8781,
marcus.danny@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
II. Wisconsin’s Submittals Regarding GHGs
III. What is the background for this proposed
action?
IV. What is EPA’s analysis of Wisconsin’s
proposed SIP revision?
V. What action is EPA Taking?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
I. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
When submitting comments,
remember to:
1. Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
2. Follow directions—EPA may ask
you to respond to specific questions or
organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
4. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
5. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
6. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
7. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
8. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Wisconsin’s Submittals Regarding
GHGs
In separate letters, dated May 4, 2011,
June 20, 2012, and September 28, 2012,
WDNR submitted requests to EPA for
approval of revisions to the State’s SIP
to incorporate rule amendments
adopted by Wisconsin related to GHG
provisions.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
A. Submittal on the Tailoring Rule
Provisions
The first set of rules, originally
submitted on May 4, 2011, became
effective in the Wisconsin
Administrative Code on September 1,
2011. These amendments establish
thresholds for GHG emissions in
Wisconsin’s PSD regulations at the same
emissions thresholds and in the same
time frames as those specified by EPA
in the ‘‘PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas
Tailoring; Final Rule,’’ 75 FR 31514
(June 3, 2010), hereafter referred to as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:23 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
the ‘‘Tailoring Rule,’’ ensuring that
smaller GHG sources emitting less than
these thresholds will not be subject to
permitting requirements for GHGs that
they emit. The amendments to the SIP
clarify the applicable thresholds in the
Wisconsin SIP, address the flaw
discussed in the ‘‘Limitation of
Approval of Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Provisions Concerning
Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources in
State Implementation Plans Final Rule,’’
75 FR 82536 (December 30, 2010) (the
‘‘PSD SIP Narrowing Rule’’), and
incorporate State rule changes adopted
at the State level into the Federallyapproved SIP.
B. Submittal on the Deferral of CO2
Emissions From Biogenic Sources
On June 20, 2012, WDNR submitted
final adopted rules related to the
deferral of CO2 emissions from
bioenergy and other biogenic sources
(biogenic CO2 emissions), when
determining whether the modification
of a stationary source would result in a
net emissions increase that would
trigger PSD thresholds, and require the
application of Best Available Control
Technology (BACT). The adopted rules
became effective on April 16, 2012. The
purpose of the amendment is to
incorporate the Federal deferral for
biogenic CO2 emissions into the
Wisconsin’s SIP provisions that govern
GHG applicability.
In today’s action, pursuant to section
110 of the CAA, EPA is proposing to
approve these revisions into the
Wisconsin SIP.
III. What is the background for this
proposed action?
This section briefly summarizes EPA’s
recent GHG-related actions that provide
the background for this proposed action.
More detailed discussion of the
background is found in the preambles
for those actions. In particular, the
background is contained in what we call
the GHG PSD SIP Narrowing Rule,1 and
in the preambles to the actions it cites.
A. GHG-Related Actions
EPA has recently undertaken a series
of actions pertaining to the regulation of
GHGs that, although for the most part
are distinct from one another, establish
the overall framework for this proposed
action on the Wisconsin SIP. Four of
these actions include, as they are
commonly called, the ‘‘Endangerment
Finding’’ and ‘‘Cause or Contribute
1 ‘‘Limitation of Approval of Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Provisions Concerning
Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources in State
Implementation Plans; Final Rule.’’ 75 FR 82536
(December 30, 2010).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76431
Finding,’’ which EPA issued in a single
final action,2 the ‘‘Johnson Memo
Reconsideration,’’ 3 the ‘‘Light-Duty
Vehicle Rule,’’ 4 and the ‘‘Tailoring
Rule.’’ Taken together and in
conjunction with the CAA, these actions
establish regulatory requirements for
GHGs emitted from new motor vehicles
and new motor vehicle engines;
determine that such regulations, when
they took effect on January 2, 2011,
subject GHGs emitted from stationary
sources to PSD requirements; and limit
the applicability of PSD requirements to
GHG sources on a phased-in basis. EPA
promulgated this last action in the
Tailoring Rule, which, more
specifically, established appropriate
GHG emission thresholds for
determining the applicability of PSD
requirements to GHG-emitting sources.
PSD is implemented through the SIP
process. Pursuant to this process in
December 2010, EPA promulgated
several rules to implement the new GHG
PSD SIP program. Recognizing that
some states had approved SIP PSD
programs that did not apply PSD to
GHGs, EPA issued a SIP call and, for
some of these states, a Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP).5
Recognizing that other states had
approved SIP PSD programs that do
apply PSD to GHGs, but that do so for
sources that emit as little as 100 or 250
tons per year (tpy) of GHGs, and that do
not limit PSD applicability to GHGs to
2 ‘‘Endangerment and Cause or Contribute
Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section
202(a) of the Clean Air Act.’’ 74 FR 66496
(December 15, 2009).
3 ‘‘Interpretation of Regulations that Determine
Pollutants Covered by Clean Air Act Permitting
Programs.’’ 75 FR 17004 (April 2, 2010).
4 ‘‘Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission
Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy
Standards; Final Rule.’’ 75 FR 25324 (May 7, 2010).
5 Specifically, by action dated December 13, 2010,
EPA finalized a ‘‘SIP Call’’ that would require those
states with SIPs that have approved PSD programs
but do not authorize PSD permitting for GHGs to
submit a SIP revision providing such authority.
‘‘Action To Ensure Authority To Issue Permits
Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions:
Finding of Substantial Inadequacy and SIP Call,’’ 75
FR 77698 (December 13, 2010). EPA has begun
making findings of failure to submit that would
apply in any state unable to submit the required SIP
revision by its deadline, and finalizing FIPs for such
states. See, e.g., ‘‘Action To Ensure Authority To
Issue Permits Under the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Program to Sources of Greenhouse
Gas Emissions: Finding of Failure To Submit State
Implementation Plan Revisions Required for
Greenhouse Gases,’’ 75 FR 81874 (December 29,
2010); ‘‘Action To Ensure Authority To Issue
Permits Under the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Program to Sources of Greenhouse
Gas Emissions: Federal Implementation Plan,’’ 75
FR 82246 (December 30, 2010). Because
Wisconsin’s SIP already authorizes WDNR to
regulate GHGs once GHGs become subject to PSD
requirements on January 2, 2011, Wisconsin is not
subject to the proposed SIP Call or FIP.
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
76432
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
the higher thresholds in the Tailoring
Rule, EPA issued the GHG PSD SIP
Narrowing Rule. Under that rule, EPA
withdrew its approval of the affected
provisions within the SIPs to the extent
those provisions covered GHG-emitting
sources below the Tailoring Rule
thresholds.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
B. EPA’s Biomass Deferral Rule
On July 20, 2011, EPA promulgated
the final ‘‘Deferral for CO2 Emissions
from Bioenergy and other Biogenic
Sources Under the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title
V Programs’’ (Biomass Deferral). The
following is a brief discussion of the
deferral. For a full discussion of EPA’s
rationale for the rule, see the notice of
final rulemaking at 76 FR 43490 (July
20, 2011).
The biomass deferral delays the
consideration of CO2 emissions from
bioenergy and other biogenic sources
(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘biogenic CO2
emissions’’) when determining whether
a stationary source meets the PSD and
Title V applicability thresholds,
including those for the application of
BACT 6 until July 21, 2014. Stationary
sources that combust biomass (or
otherwise emit biogenic CO2 emissions)
and construct or modify during the
deferral period will avoid the
application of PSD to the biogenic CO2
emissions resulting from those actions.
The deferral applies only to biogenic
CO2 emissions and does not affect nonGHG pollutants or other GHGs (e.g.,
methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O))
emitted from the combustion of biomass
fuel. Also, the deferral only pertains to
biogenic CO2 emissions in the PSD and
Title V programs and does not pertain
to any other EPA programs such as the
GHG Reporting Program.
Biogenic CO2 emissions are defined as
emissions of CO2 from a stationary
source directly resulting from the
combustion or decomposition of
biologically-based materials other than
fossil fuels and mineral sources of
carbon. Examples of ‘‘biogenic CO2
emissions’’ include, but are not limited
to:
• CO2 generated from the biological
decomposition of waste in landfills,
wastewater treatment or manure
management processes;
• CO2 from the combustion of biogas
collected from biological decomposition
of waste in landfills, wastewater
treatment or manure management
processes;
6 As with the Tailoring Rule, the Biomass Deferral
addresses both PSD and Title V requirements.
However, EPA is only taking action on WDNR’s
PSD program as part of this action.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:23 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
• CO2 from fermentation during
ethanol production or other industrial
fermentation processes;
• CO2 from combustion of the
biological fraction of municipal solid
waste or biosolids;
• CO2 from combustion of the
biological fraction of tire-derived fuel;
and
• CO2 derived from combustion of
biological material, including all types
of wood and wood waste, forest residue,
and agricultural material.
EPA recognizes that use of certain
types of biomass can be part of the
national strategy to reduce dependence
on fossil fuels. Efforts are underway at
the Federal, state and regional level to
foster the expansion of renewable
resources and promote bioenergy
projects, increase domestic alternative
energy production, enhance forest
management and create related
employment opportunities. Part of
fostering this development is to ensure
that those feedstocks with negligible net
atmospheric impact not be subject to
unnecessary regulation. At the same
time, it is important that EPA have time
to conduct its detailed examination of
the science and technical issues related
to accounting for biogenic CO2
emissions. The deferral is intended to be
a temporary measure, in effect for no
more than three years, to allow the
Agency time to complete its work and
determine what, if any, treatment of
biogenic CO2 emissions should be in the
PSD and Title V programs. The Agency
plans to complete its science and
technical review and any follow up
rulemakings within the three year
deferral period and believes that three
years is ample time to complete these
tasks. It is possible that the subsequent
rulemaking, depending on the nature of
EPA’s determinations, would supersede
the biomass deferral rulemaking and
become effective in fewer than three
years. In that event, Wisconsin may be
required to revise its SIP accordingly.
For stationary sources co-firing fossil
fuel and biologically-based fuel, and/or
combusting mixed fuels (e.g., tire
derived fuels, municipal solid waste
(MSW)), the biogenic CO2 emissions
from that combustion are included in
the biomass deferral. However, the fossil
CO2 emissions are not included in the
deferral. Emissions of CO2 from
processing of mineral feedstocks (e.g.,
calcium carbonate) are also not included
in the deferral. Various methods are
available to calculate both the biogenic
and fossil portions of CO2 emissions,
including those methods contained in
the GHG Reporting Program (40 CFR
part 98). Consistent with the other
pollutants subject to PSD, there are no
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requirements to use a particular method
in determining biogenic and fossil CO2
emissions.
EPA’s final biomass deferral rule is an
interim deferral for biogenic CO2
emissions only and does not relieve
sources of the obligation to meet the
PSD permitting requirements for other
pollutant emissions that are otherwise
applicable to the source during the
deferral period, or that may be
applicable to the source at a future date
pending the results of EPA’s study and
subsequent rulemaking action. This
means, for example, that if the deferral
is applicable to biogenic CO2 emissions
from a particular source during the three
year effective period and the study and
future rulemaking do not provide for a
permanent exemption from PSD
permitting requirements for the biogenic
CO2 emissions from a source with
particular characteristics, then the
deferral would end for that type of
source and its biogenic CO2 emissions
would have to be appropriately
considered in any applicability
determinations that the source may
need to conduct for future stationary
source permitting purposes, consistent
with that subsequent rulemaking and
the Final Tailoring Rule (e.g., a major
source determination for Title V
purposes or a major modification
determination for PSD purposes). EPA
also wishes to clarify that we did not
require that a PSD permit issued during
the deferral period be amended or that
any PSD requirements in a PSD permit
existing at the time the deferral took
effect, such as BACT limitations, be
revised or removed from an effective
PSD permit for any reason related to the
deferral or when the deferral period
expires.
40 CFR 52.21(w) requires that any
PSD permit shall remain in effect,
unless and until it expires or it is
rescinded, under the limited conditions
specified in that provision. Thus, a PSD
permit that is issued to a source while
the deferral was effective need not be
reopened or amended if the source is no
longer eligible to exclude its biogenic
CO2 emissions from PSD applicability
after the deferral expires. However, if
such a source undertakes a modification
that could potentially require a PSD
permit and the source is not eligible to
continue excluding its biogenic CO2
emissions after the deferral expires, the
source will need to consider its biogenic
CO2 emissions in assessing whether it
needs a PSD permit to authorize the
modification.
Any future actions to modify, shorten,
or make permanent the deferral for
biogenic sources are beyond the scope
of the biomass deferral action and this
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
proposed approval of the deferral into
the Wisconsin SIP, and will be
addressed through subsequent
rulemaking.
C. Wisconsin’s Actions
On July 28, 2010, WDNR provided a
letter to EPA, in accordance with the
Tailoring Rule, confirming that the State
has the authority to regulate GHGs in its
PSD program. The letter provided that
WDNR intended to apply the meaning
of the term ‘‘subject to regulation’’ that
was established by EPA in the Tailoring
Rule. WDNR explained that it would
apply the term by revising chapters NR
400, 405, and 407 of the Wisconsin
Administrative Code. See the docket for
this proposed rulemaking for a copy of
WDNR’s letter.
Wisconsin’s initial revision consisted
of emergency rules under the Wisconsin
Administrative Code, since WDNR was
unable to meet the January 2, 2011
effective date for applicability of PSD
for GHG’s. WDNR passed the emergency
rules to implement the PSD program
consistent with the Tailoring Rule on
December 15, 2010.
In the SIP Narrowing Rule, 75 FR
82536 (December 30, 2010), EPA
withdrew its approval of certain
provisions of Wisconsin’s SIP, among
other SIPs, to the extent that those
provisions of the SIP apply PSD
permitting requirements to GHG
emissions from sources emitting at
levels below those set in the Tailoring
Rule.7 In this rule, EPA found that the
affected states, including Wisconsin,
had a flaw in their SIPs at the time they
submitted their PSD programs, which
was that the applicability of the PSD
programs was potentially broader than
the resources available to them under
their SIP.8 Accordingly, for each
affected state, including Wisconsin, EPA
concluded that EPA’s SIP approval
action was in error, under CAA section
110(k)(6), and EPA rescinded its
approval to the extent the PSD program
applies to GHG-emitting sources below
the Tailoring Rule thresholds.9 EPA
recommended that states adopt a SIP
revision to incorporate the Tailoring
Rule thresholds, thereby (i) assuring that
under state law, only sources at or above
the Tailoring Rule thresholds would be
subject to PSD; and (ii) avoiding
confusion under the Federally-approved
SIP by clarifying that the SIP applies to
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
7 ‘‘Limitation
of Approval of Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Provisions Concerning
Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources in State
Implementation Plans; Final Rule.’’ 75 FR 82536
(December 30, 2010).
8 Id. at 75 FR 82542.
9 Id. at 75 FR 82544.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:23 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
only sources at or above the Tailoring
Rule thresholds.10
As a result, Wisconsin’s current
approved SIP provides the state with
authority to regulate GHGs, but only at
and above the Tailoring Rule thresholds;
and requires new and modified sources
to receive a PSD permit based on GHG
emissions only if they emit at or above
the Tailoring Rule thresholds.
WDNR is currently authorized to
regulate the GHG PSD regulations
consistent with the Tailoring Rule at the
State level since WDNR passed
emergency rules consistent with the
Tailoring Rule. The combination of
these emergency rules and the SIP
narrowing rule has allowed WDNR to
implement the PSD GHG regulations
consistent with the Tailoring Rule. At
this time, WDNR is formally seeking to
revise its SIP with permanent rules
(identical to the emergency rules) for
final approval by EPA. WDNR has
formally amended regulations to
incorporate the Tailoring Rule
thresholds, and has submitted its
amendments to EPA for approval.
IV. What is EPA’s analysis of
Wisconsin’s proposed SIP revision?
The regulatory revisions that WDNR
submitted for approval on May 4, 2011,
June 20, 2012, and September 28, 2012,
establish thresholds for determining
which stationary sources and
modifications become subject to
permitting requirements for GHG
emissions under WDNR’s PSD program
as well as incorporate the biomass
deferral that delays until July 21, 2014,
the consideration of biogenic CO2
emissions when determining whether a
stationary source meets the PSD
thresholds. Specifically, the submittal
regarding the implementation of the
Tailoring Rule includes changes to
WDNR’s PSD regulations at NR
400.02(74m), NR 400.03(3)(om), NR
400.03(4)(go) and (kg), NR 405.02(28m),
and NR 405.07(9).
A. WDNR’s Revisions Regarding the
Tailoring Rule Provisions
Wisconsin is currently a SIP approved
state for the PSD program, and has
incorporated EPA’s 2002 New Source
Review (NSR) reform revisions, 67 FR
80186 (December 31, 2002), for PSD into
its SIP, 73 FR 76560 (December 17,
2008). In a letter provided to EPA on
July 28, 2010, WDNR notified EPA of its
interpretation that Wisconsin currently
has the authority to regulate GHGs
under its NR 400 and NR 405 PSD
regulations. The current WDNR program
(adopted prior to the promulgation of
10 Id.
PO 00000
at 75 FR 82540.
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76433
EPA’s Tailoring Rule) applies to major
stationary sources (having the potential
to emit at least 100 tpy or 250 tpy or
more of a regulated NSR pollutant,
depending on the type of source) or
modifications undertaken in areas
designated attainment or unclassifiable
with respect to the NAAQS.
Among the changes WDNR has
undertaken, WDNR has revised NR 400
to add the definition of ‘‘Greenhouse
gases’’. WDNR has also revised NR 405
to define ‘‘Subject to regulation under
the Act’’, and to establish the new
tailoring rule thresholds for GHG
applicability.
B. WDNR’s Revisions Regarding the
Deferral of CO2 Emissions From
Biogenic Sources
With respect to the changes
undertaken by WDNR regarding the
biomass deferral rule, WDNR has
revised 285.60 and 285.63 of the Wis.
State Statutes. Sections 285.60(3m) and
285.63(3m) have been created to
establish that emissions of GHG’s from
biogenic CO2 emissions are exempt from
GHG PSD permitting consistent with 40
CFR 51.66(b)(48). Consistent with
Wisconsin’s formal request within the
June 20, 2012 submittal, we are
proposing to approve only revisions
with respect to PSD for the biomass
deferral rule.
V. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve
Wisconsin’s May 4, 2011, June 20, 2012,
and September 28, 2012, SIP submittals,
relating to PSD requirements for GHGemitting sources. Specifically,
Wisconsin’s proposed SIP revisions
establish appropriate emissions
thresholds for determining PSD
applicability to new and modified GHGemitting sources in accordance with
EPA’s Tailoring Rule and biomass
deferral rule. EPA has made the
preliminary determination that these
SIP submittals are approvable because
they are in accordance with the CAA
and EPA regulations regarding PSD
permitting for GHGs.11
If EPA does approve Wisconsin’s
changes to its air quality regulations to
incorporate the appropriate thresholds
for GHG permitting applicability into
WDNR’s SIP, then 40 CFR 52.2572(b), as
included in EPA’s SIP Narrowing Rule,
which codifies EPA’s limiting its
11 As explained on page 7, with respect to the first
package for submittal regarding the Tailoring rule
provisions, we are proposing approval based on the
May 4, 2011 SIP submittal which was sent for
parallel processing. EPA is awaiting the formal
state-effective SIP revision request from WDNR.
EPA will only then be able to prepare a final
rulemaking action for the SIP revision with respect
to the Tailoring rule provisions.
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
76434
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
approval of WDNR’s PSD SIP to not
cover the applicability of PSD to GHGemitting sources below the Tailoring
Rule thresholds, is no longer necessary.
In this proposed action, EPA is also
proposing to amend 40 CFR 52.2572 to
remove this unnecessary regulatory
language.
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:23 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 17, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2012–31191 Filed 12–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of Inspector General
42 CFR Part 1001
Solicitation of New Safe Harbors and
Special Fraud Alerts
Office of Inspector General
(OIG), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of intent to develop
regulations.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
205 of the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA), this annual notice solicits
proposals and recommendations for
developing new and modifying existing
safe harbor provisions under the Federal
anti-kickback statute (section 1128B(b)
of the Social Security Act), as well as
developing new OIG Special Fraud
Alerts.
To ensure consideration, public
comments must be delivered to the
address provided below by no later than
5 p.m. on February 26, 2013.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code OIG–121–N. Because of staff
and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (fax)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
three ways (no duplicates, please):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on specific
recommendations and proposals
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov.
2. By regular, express, or overnight
mail. You may send written comments
to the following address: Patrice Drew,
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Office of Inspector General,
Congressional and Regulatory Affairs,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: OIG–121–N, Room
5541C, Cohen Building, 330
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201. Please allow
sufficient time for mailed comments to
be received before the close of the
comment period.
3. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver, by hand or courier,
your written comments before the close
of the comment period to Patrice Drew,
Office of Inspector General, Department
of Health and Human Services, Cohen
Building, Room 5541C, 330
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201. Because access
to the interior of the Cohen Building is
not readily available to persons without
Federal Government identification,
commenters are encouraged to schedule
their delivery with one of our staff
members at (202) 619–1368.
For information on viewing public
comments, please see the
Supplementary Information section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrice Drew, Congressional and
Regulatory Affairs Liaison, Office of
Inspector General, (202) 619–1368.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submitting Comments: We welcome
comments from the public on
recommendations for developing new or
revised safe harbors and Special Fraud
Alerts. Please assist us by referencing
the file code OIG–121–N.
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the end of the
comment period are available for
viewing by the public. All comments
will be posted on https://
www.regulations.gov as soon as possible
after they have been received.
Comments received timely will also be
available for public inspection as they
are received at Office of Inspector
General, Department of Health and
Human Services, Cohen Building, 330
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201, Monday
through Friday from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
To schedule an appointment to view
public comments, phone (202) 619–
1368.
I. Background
A. OIG Safe Harbor Provisions
Section 1128B(b) of the Social
Security Act (the Act) (42 U.S.C. 1320a–
7b(b)) provides criminal penalties for
individuals or entities that knowingly
and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or
receive remuneration to induce or
reward business reimbursable under the
Federal health care programs. The
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76430-76434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31191]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0467; EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0538; FRL-9765-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Prevention of Significant Deterioration Greenhouse Gas
Tailoring and Biomass Deferral Rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources (WDNR) to EPA on May 4, 2011, June 20, 2012, and
September 28, 2012. The proposed revisions modify Wisconsin's
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program to establish
appropriate emission thresholds for determining which new stationary
sources and modification projects become subject to Wisconsin's PSD
permitting requirements for their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Additionally, these revisions propose to defer until July 21, 2014, the
application of the PSD permitting requirements to biogenic carbon
dioxide (CO2) emissions from bioenergy and other biogenic
stationary sources in the State of Wisconsin. EPA is proposing approval
of Wisconsin's revisions because the Agency has made the preliminary
determination that these revisions are in accordance with the Clean Air
Act (CAA) and EPA regulations regarding PSD permitting for GHGs.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2011-0467, or EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0538 by one of the following
methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: damico.genevieve@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312)692-2450.
4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID Nos. EPA-R05-OAR-
2011-0467, or EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0538. EPA's policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public docket without change and may
be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through
www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting
comments, go to Section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
We recommend that you telephone Danny Marcus, Environmental Engineer,
at (312) 353-8781 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Danny Marcus, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8781, marcus.danny@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean
[[Page 76431]]
EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
II. Wisconsin's Submittals Regarding GHGs
III. What is the background for this proposed action?
IV. What is EPA's analysis of Wisconsin's proposed SIP revision?
V. What action is EPA Taking?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
I. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
When submitting comments, remember to:
1. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
2. Follow directions--EPA may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
4. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
5. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
6. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
7. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
8. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
II. Wisconsin's Submittals Regarding GHGs
In separate letters, dated May 4, 2011, June 20, 2012, and
September 28, 2012, WDNR submitted requests to EPA for approval of
revisions to the State's SIP to incorporate rule amendments adopted by
Wisconsin related to GHG provisions.
A. Submittal on the Tailoring Rule Provisions
The first set of rules, originally submitted on May 4, 2011, became
effective in the Wisconsin Administrative Code on September 1, 2011.
These amendments establish thresholds for GHG emissions in Wisconsin's
PSD regulations at the same emissions thresholds and in the same time
frames as those specified by EPA in the ``PSD and Title V Greenhouse
Gas Tailoring; Final Rule,'' 75 FR 31514 (June 3, 2010), hereafter
referred to as the ``Tailoring Rule,'' ensuring that smaller GHG
sources emitting less than these thresholds will not be subject to
permitting requirements for GHGs that they emit. The amendments to the
SIP clarify the applicable thresholds in the Wisconsin SIP, address the
flaw discussed in the ``Limitation of Approval of Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas
Emitting-Sources in State Implementation Plans Final Rule,'' 75 FR
82536 (December 30, 2010) (the ``PSD SIP Narrowing Rule''), and
incorporate State rule changes adopted at the State level into the
Federally-approved SIP.
B. Submittal on the Deferral of CO2 Emissions From Biogenic Sources
On June 20, 2012, WDNR submitted final adopted rules related to the
deferral of CO2 emissions from bioenergy and other biogenic
sources (biogenic CO2 emissions), when determining whether
the modification of a stationary source would result in a net emissions
increase that would trigger PSD thresholds, and require the application
of Best Available Control Technology (BACT). The adopted rules became
effective on April 16, 2012. The purpose of the amendment is to
incorporate the Federal deferral for biogenic CO2 emissions
into the Wisconsin's SIP provisions that govern GHG applicability.
In today's action, pursuant to section 110 of the CAA, EPA is
proposing to approve these revisions into the Wisconsin SIP.
III. What is the background for this proposed action?
This section briefly summarizes EPA's recent GHG-related actions
that provide the background for this proposed action. More detailed
discussion of the background is found in the preambles for those
actions. In particular, the background is contained in what we call the
GHG PSD SIP Narrowing Rule,\1\ and in the preambles to the actions it
cites.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Limitation of Approval of Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources
in State Implementation Plans; Final Rule.'' 75 FR 82536 (December
30, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. GHG-Related Actions
EPA has recently undertaken a series of actions pertaining to the
regulation of GHGs that, although for the most part are distinct from
one another, establish the overall framework for this proposed action
on the Wisconsin SIP. Four of these actions include, as they are
commonly called, the ``Endangerment Finding'' and ``Cause or Contribute
Finding,'' which EPA issued in a single final action,\2\ the ``Johnson
Memo Reconsideration,'' \3\ the ``Light-Duty Vehicle Rule,'' \4\ and
the ``Tailoring Rule.'' Taken together and in conjunction with the CAA,
these actions establish regulatory requirements for GHGs emitted from
new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines; determine that such
regulations, when they took effect on January 2, 2011, subject GHGs
emitted from stationary sources to PSD requirements; and limit the
applicability of PSD requirements to GHG sources on a phased-in basis.
EPA promulgated this last action in the Tailoring Rule, which, more
specifically, established appropriate GHG emission thresholds for
determining the applicability of PSD requirements to GHG-emitting
sources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ ``Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for
Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.'' 74 FR
66496 (December 15, 2009).
\3\ ``Interpretation of Regulations that Determine Pollutants
Covered by Clean Air Act Permitting Programs.'' 75 FR 17004 (April
2, 2010).
\4\ ``Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and
Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards; Final Rule.'' 75 FR 25324
(May 7, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PSD is implemented through the SIP process. Pursuant to this
process in December 2010, EPA promulgated several rules to implement
the new GHG PSD SIP program. Recognizing that some states had approved
SIP PSD programs that did not apply PSD to GHGs, EPA issued a SIP call
and, for some of these states, a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP).\5\
Recognizing that other states had approved SIP PSD programs that do
apply PSD to GHGs, but that do so for sources that emit as little as
100 or 250 tons per year (tpy) of GHGs, and that do not limit PSD
applicability to GHGs to
[[Page 76432]]
the higher thresholds in the Tailoring Rule, EPA issued the GHG PSD SIP
Narrowing Rule. Under that rule, EPA withdrew its approval of the
affected provisions within the SIPs to the extent those provisions
covered GHG-emitting sources below the Tailoring Rule thresholds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Specifically, by action dated December 13, 2010, EPA
finalized a ``SIP Call'' that would require those states with SIPs
that have approved PSD programs but do not authorize PSD permitting
for GHGs to submit a SIP revision providing such authority. ``Action
To Ensure Authority To Issue Permits Under the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions: Finding of Substantial Inadequacy and SIP Call,'' 75 FR
77698 (December 13, 2010). EPA has begun making findings of failure
to submit that would apply in any state unable to submit the
required SIP revision by its deadline, and finalizing FIPs for such
states. See, e.g., ``Action To Ensure Authority To Issue Permits
Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Sources
of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Finding of Failure To Submit State
Implementation Plan Revisions Required for Greenhouse Gases,'' 75 FR
81874 (December 29, 2010); ``Action To Ensure Authority To Issue
Permits Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to
Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Federal Implementation Plan,''
75 FR 82246 (December 30, 2010). Because Wisconsin's SIP already
authorizes WDNR to regulate GHGs once GHGs become subject to PSD
requirements on January 2, 2011, Wisconsin is not subject to the
proposed SIP Call or FIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. EPA's Biomass Deferral Rule
On July 20, 2011, EPA promulgated the final ``Deferral for
CO2 Emissions from Bioenergy and other Biogenic Sources
Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V
Programs'' (Biomass Deferral). The following is a brief discussion of
the deferral. For a full discussion of EPA's rationale for the rule,
see the notice of final rulemaking at 76 FR 43490 (July 20, 2011).
The biomass deferral delays the consideration of CO2
emissions from bioenergy and other biogenic sources (hereinafter
referred to as ``biogenic CO2 emissions'') when determining
whether a stationary source meets the PSD and Title V applicability
thresholds, including those for the application of BACT \6\ until July
21, 2014. Stationary sources that combust biomass (or otherwise emit
biogenic CO2 emissions) and construct or modify during the
deferral period will avoid the application of PSD to the biogenic
CO2 emissions resulting from those actions. The deferral
applies only to biogenic CO2 emissions and does not affect
non-GHG pollutants or other GHGs (e.g., methane (CH4) and
nitrous oxide (N2O)) emitted from the combustion of biomass
fuel. Also, the deferral only pertains to biogenic CO2
emissions in the PSD and Title V programs and does not pertain to any
other EPA programs such as the GHG Reporting Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ As with the Tailoring Rule, the Biomass Deferral addresses
both PSD and Title V requirements. However, EPA is only taking
action on WDNR's PSD program as part of this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biogenic CO2 emissions are defined as emissions of
CO2 from a stationary source directly resulting from the
combustion or decomposition of biologically-based materials other than
fossil fuels and mineral sources of carbon. Examples of ``biogenic
CO2 emissions'' include, but are not limited to:
CO2 generated from the biological decomposition
of waste in landfills, wastewater treatment or manure management
processes;
CO2 from the combustion of biogas collected
from biological decomposition of waste in landfills, wastewater
treatment or manure management processes;
CO2 from fermentation during ethanol production
or other industrial fermentation processes;
CO2 from combustion of the biological fraction
of municipal solid waste or biosolids;
CO2 from combustion of the biological fraction
of tire-derived fuel; and
CO2 derived from combustion of biological
material, including all types of wood and wood waste, forest residue,
and agricultural material.
EPA recognizes that use of certain types of biomass can be part of
the national strategy to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Efforts are
underway at the Federal, state and regional level to foster the
expansion of renewable resources and promote bioenergy projects,
increase domestic alternative energy production, enhance forest
management and create related employment opportunities. Part of
fostering this development is to ensure that those feedstocks with
negligible net atmospheric impact not be subject to unnecessary
regulation. At the same time, it is important that EPA have time to
conduct its detailed examination of the science and technical issues
related to accounting for biogenic CO2 emissions. The
deferral is intended to be a temporary measure, in effect for no more
than three years, to allow the Agency time to complete its work and
determine what, if any, treatment of biogenic CO2 emissions
should be in the PSD and Title V programs. The Agency plans to complete
its science and technical review and any follow up rulemakings within
the three year deferral period and believes that three years is ample
time to complete these tasks. It is possible that the subsequent
rulemaking, depending on the nature of EPA's determinations, would
supersede the biomass deferral rulemaking and become effective in fewer
than three years. In that event, Wisconsin may be required to revise
its SIP accordingly.
For stationary sources co-firing fossil fuel and biologically-based
fuel, and/or combusting mixed fuels (e.g., tire derived fuels,
municipal solid waste (MSW)), the biogenic CO2 emissions
from that combustion are included in the biomass deferral. However, the
fossil CO2 emissions are not included in the deferral.
Emissions of CO2 from processing of mineral feedstocks
(e.g., calcium carbonate) are also not included in the deferral.
Various methods are available to calculate both the biogenic and fossil
portions of CO2 emissions, including those methods contained
in the GHG Reporting Program (40 CFR part 98). Consistent with the
other pollutants subject to PSD, there are no requirements to use a
particular method in determining biogenic and fossil CO2
emissions.
EPA's final biomass deferral rule is an interim deferral for
biogenic CO2 emissions only and does not relieve sources of
the obligation to meet the PSD permitting requirements for other
pollutant emissions that are otherwise applicable to the source during
the deferral period, or that may be applicable to the source at a
future date pending the results of EPA's study and subsequent
rulemaking action. This means, for example, that if the deferral is
applicable to biogenic CO2 emissions from a particular
source during the three year effective period and the study and future
rulemaking do not provide for a permanent exemption from PSD permitting
requirements for the biogenic CO2 emissions from a source
with particular characteristics, then the deferral would end for that
type of source and its biogenic CO2 emissions would have to
be appropriately considered in any applicability determinations that
the source may need to conduct for future stationary source permitting
purposes, consistent with that subsequent rulemaking and the Final
Tailoring Rule (e.g., a major source determination for Title V purposes
or a major modification determination for PSD purposes). EPA also
wishes to clarify that we did not require that a PSD permit issued
during the deferral period be amended or that any PSD requirements in a
PSD permit existing at the time the deferral took effect, such as BACT
limitations, be revised or removed from an effective PSD permit for any
reason related to the deferral or when the deferral period expires.
40 CFR 52.21(w) requires that any PSD permit shall remain in
effect, unless and until it expires or it is rescinded, under the
limited conditions specified in that provision. Thus, a PSD permit that
is issued to a source while the deferral was effective need not be
reopened or amended if the source is no longer eligible to exclude its
biogenic CO2 emissions from PSD applicability after the
deferral expires. However, if such a source undertakes a modification
that could potentially require a PSD permit and the source is not
eligible to continue excluding its biogenic CO2 emissions
after the deferral expires, the source will need to consider its
biogenic CO2 emissions in assessing whether it needs a PSD
permit to authorize the modification.
Any future actions to modify, shorten, or make permanent the
deferral for biogenic sources are beyond the scope of the biomass
deferral action and this
[[Page 76433]]
proposed approval of the deferral into the Wisconsin SIP, and will be
addressed through subsequent rulemaking.
C. Wisconsin's Actions
On July 28, 2010, WDNR provided a letter to EPA, in accordance with
the Tailoring Rule, confirming that the State has the authority to
regulate GHGs in its PSD program. The letter provided that WDNR
intended to apply the meaning of the term ``subject to regulation''
that was established by EPA in the Tailoring Rule. WDNR explained that
it would apply the term by revising chapters NR 400, 405, and 407 of
the Wisconsin Administrative Code. See the docket for this proposed
rulemaking for a copy of WDNR's letter.
Wisconsin's initial revision consisted of emergency rules under the
Wisconsin Administrative Code, since WDNR was unable to meet the
January 2, 2011 effective date for applicability of PSD for GHG's. WDNR
passed the emergency rules to implement the PSD program consistent with
the Tailoring Rule on December 15, 2010.
In the SIP Narrowing Rule, 75 FR 82536 (December 30, 2010), EPA
withdrew its approval of certain provisions of Wisconsin's SIP, among
other SIPs, to the extent that those provisions of the SIP apply PSD
permitting requirements to GHG emissions from sources emitting at
levels below those set in the Tailoring Rule.\7\ In this rule, EPA
found that the affected states, including Wisconsin, had a flaw in
their SIPs at the time they submitted their PSD programs, which was
that the applicability of the PSD programs was potentially broader than
the resources available to them under their SIP.\8\ Accordingly, for
each affected state, including Wisconsin, EPA concluded that EPA's SIP
approval action was in error, under CAA section 110(k)(6), and EPA
rescinded its approval to the extent the PSD program applies to GHG-
emitting sources below the Tailoring Rule thresholds.\9\ EPA
recommended that states adopt a SIP revision to incorporate the
Tailoring Rule thresholds, thereby (i) assuring that under state law,
only sources at or above the Tailoring Rule thresholds would be subject
to PSD; and (ii) avoiding confusion under the Federally-approved SIP by
clarifying that the SIP applies to only sources at or above the
Tailoring Rule thresholds.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ ``Limitation of Approval of Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources
in State Implementation Plans; Final Rule.'' 75 FR 82536 (December
30, 2010).
\8\ Id. at 75 FR 82542.
\9\ Id. at 75 FR 82544.
\10\ Id. at 75 FR 82540.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a result, Wisconsin's current approved SIP provides the state
with authority to regulate GHGs, but only at and above the Tailoring
Rule thresholds; and requires new and modified sources to receive a PSD
permit based on GHG emissions only if they emit at or above the
Tailoring Rule thresholds.
WDNR is currently authorized to regulate the GHG PSD regulations
consistent with the Tailoring Rule at the State level since WDNR passed
emergency rules consistent with the Tailoring Rule. The combination of
these emergency rules and the SIP narrowing rule has allowed WDNR to
implement the PSD GHG regulations consistent with the Tailoring Rule.
At this time, WDNR is formally seeking to revise its SIP with permanent
rules (identical to the emergency rules) for final approval by EPA.
WDNR has formally amended regulations to incorporate the Tailoring Rule
thresholds, and has submitted its amendments to EPA for approval.
IV. What is EPA's analysis of Wisconsin's proposed SIP revision?
The regulatory revisions that WDNR submitted for approval on May 4,
2011, June 20, 2012, and September 28, 2012, establish thresholds for
determining which stationary sources and modifications become subject
to permitting requirements for GHG emissions under WDNR's PSD program
as well as incorporate the biomass deferral that delays until July 21,
2014, the consideration of biogenic CO2 emissions when
determining whether a stationary source meets the PSD thresholds.
Specifically, the submittal regarding the implementation of the
Tailoring Rule includes changes to WDNR's PSD regulations at NR
400.02(74m), NR 400.03(3)(om), NR 400.03(4)(go) and (kg), NR
405.02(28m), and NR 405.07(9).
A. WDNR's Revisions Regarding the Tailoring Rule Provisions
Wisconsin is currently a SIP approved state for the PSD program,
and has incorporated EPA's 2002 New Source Review (NSR) reform
revisions, 67 FR 80186 (December 31, 2002), for PSD into its SIP, 73 FR
76560 (December 17, 2008). In a letter provided to EPA on July 28,
2010, WDNR notified EPA of its interpretation that Wisconsin currently
has the authority to regulate GHGs under its NR 400 and NR 405 PSD
regulations. The current WDNR program (adopted prior to the
promulgation of EPA's Tailoring Rule) applies to major stationary
sources (having the potential to emit at least 100 tpy or 250 tpy or
more of a regulated NSR pollutant, depending on the type of source) or
modifications undertaken in areas designated attainment or
unclassifiable with respect to the NAAQS.
Among the changes WDNR has undertaken, WDNR has revised NR 400 to
add the definition of ``Greenhouse gases''. WDNR has also revised NR
405 to define ``Subject to regulation under the Act'', and to establish
the new tailoring rule thresholds for GHG applicability.
B. WDNR's Revisions Regarding the Deferral of CO2 Emissions From
Biogenic Sources
With respect to the changes undertaken by WDNR regarding the
biomass deferral rule, WDNR has revised 285.60 and 285.63 of the Wis.
State Statutes. Sections 285.60(3m) and 285.63(3m) have been created to
establish that emissions of GHG's from biogenic CO2
emissions are exempt from GHG PSD permitting consistent with 40 CFR
51.66(b)(48). Consistent with Wisconsin's formal request within the
June 20, 2012 submittal, we are proposing to approve only revisions
with respect to PSD for the biomass deferral rule.
V. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve Wisconsin's May 4, 2011, June 20, 2012,
and September 28, 2012, SIP submittals, relating to PSD requirements
for GHG-emitting sources. Specifically, Wisconsin's proposed SIP
revisions establish appropriate emissions thresholds for determining
PSD applicability to new and modified GHG-emitting sources in
accordance with EPA's Tailoring Rule and biomass deferral rule. EPA has
made the preliminary determination that these SIP submittals are
approvable because they are in accordance with the CAA and EPA
regulations regarding PSD permitting for GHGs.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ As explained on page 7, with respect to the first package
for submittal regarding the Tailoring rule provisions, we are
proposing approval based on the May 4, 2011 SIP submittal which was
sent for parallel processing. EPA is awaiting the formal state-
effective SIP revision request from WDNR. EPA will only then be able
to prepare a final rulemaking action for the SIP revision with
respect to the Tailoring rule provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If EPA does approve Wisconsin's changes to its air quality
regulations to incorporate the appropriate thresholds for GHG
permitting applicability into WDNR's SIP, then 40 CFR 52.2572(b), as
included in EPA's SIP Narrowing Rule, which codifies EPA's limiting its
[[Page 76434]]
approval of WDNR's PSD SIP to not cover the applicability of PSD to
GHG-emitting sources below the Tailoring Rule thresholds, is no longer
necessary. In this proposed action, EPA is also proposing to amend 40
CFR 52.2572 to remove this unnecessary regulatory language.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 17, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2012-31191 Filed 12-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P