Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request, 75437-75439 [2012-30686]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 245 / Thursday, December 20, 2012 / Notices
performance and status indicators, risk
analysis and loss information, Basel II
parameters and identifier variables
(such as customer and co-borrower ID).
Also, the Federal Reserve proposes to
remove three data items from the loan
level table that can be derived from
other data items.
The Federal Reserve specifically
requests comment on an institution’s
ability to report data related to Loss
Given Default (LGD) on first Lien and
home equity loans in cases of
involuntary termination. The Federal
Reserve specifically requests comment
on what information, in addition to total
debt at time of any involuntary
termination, net recovery amount, and
sales price of property, would be
appropriate to collect in order to
estimate LGD.
Domestic Home Equity Loan and Home
Equity Line Schedule
The Federal Reserve proposes adding
27 data items to the Domestic Home
Equity Loan and Home Equity Line
schedule and deleting one data item.
The Federal Reserve proposes adding
the data items to provide more
information on loan performance,
including loss, default, modification,
foreclosure and recovery variables, and
Basel II parameters, and to be consistent
with the proposed revisions to the
Domestic First Lien Closed End 1–4
Family Residential Loan schedule, as
discussed above. The Federal Reserve
proposes to delete the Paid-in-Full
Coding data item (Field 52), as this
information is sufficiently captured in
the Liquidation Status data item (Field
54).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Address Matching Loan Level Data
Collection
The Federal Reserve proposes to add
one data item to the Address Matching
Loan Level Data Collection schedule to
indicate whether the loan is included in
the FR Y–14M First Lien Closed-End or
Home Equity Loan and Home Equity
Line schedule for that month.
Domestic Credit Card Data Collection
Data Dictionary
The Federal Reserve proposes to add
65 data items to the Domestic Credit
Card Data Collection Data Dictionary
schedule. 46 data items would be added
at the account level to collect
information surrounding identifier
variables (including corporation and
borrower IDs, address, entity type, and
trade key), purchase and payment rate
variables, status and performance data,
various fees incurred, workout program
descriptors, and credit scores and limits.
In addition, the Federal Reserve
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 Dec 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
proposes to revise the current reporting
of 11 account level data items from
optional to mandatory, in order to create
greater uniformity in the reporting of
balance, cycle and account dates and
amounts. At the portfolio level, 19 data
items would be added to collect
information on interest and non-interest
expenses, interest and noninterest
income, various types of fee income,
and taxes.
Copies of the draft reporting forms
and instructions and additional details
on the proposed data items are available
on the Federal Reserve Board’s public
Web site at: https://
www.federalreserve.gov/apps/
reportforms/review.aspx.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, December 14, 2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012–30636 Filed 12–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Title: Health Profession Opportunity
Grants (HPOG) program.
OMB No.: 0970–0394.
Description: The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF), U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is proposing data
collection activities as part of the Health
Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG)
program. ACF has developed a multipronged research and evaluation
approach for the HPOG program to
better understand and assess the
activities conducted and their results.
The proposed data collection activities
described in this notice will provide
data for three evaluation components,
the National Implementation Evaluation
of the Health Profession Opportunity
Grants to Serve TANF Recipients and
Other Low-Income Individuals (HPOG–
NIE) and the Impact Studies of the
Health Profession Opportunity Grants
(HPOG-Impact), and the Innovative
Strategies for Increasing Self Sufficiency
(ISIS) evaluation.
Two data collection efforts related to
HPOG research were approved by OMB,
including approval of a Performance
Reporting System (PRS) (approved
September 2011) and for collection of
additional baseline data for the HPOGImpact study (approved October 2012).
One data collection of ISIS was
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75437
approved (November 2011) and follow
up data collection instruments are
currently under review.
This 60-day notice describes the
remaining data collection efforts for
both HPOG–NIE and HPOG-Impact.
Two of the proposed instruments will
collect data from all of the ISIS sites.
Information collection described under
1 through 9 will be included in the next
OMB submission for review.
Information collections 10 through 14
will be submitted in a future
information collection clearance
request.
The goal of HPOG–NIE is to describe
and assess the implementation, systems
change, and outcomes and other
important information about the
operations of the 27 HPOG grantees
focused on TANF recipients and other
low-income individuals. To achieve
these goals, it is necessary to collect
data about the HPOG program designs
and implementation, HPOG partner and
program networks and indicators of
systems change, employers’ perceptions
of HPOG programs, the composition and
intensity of HPOG services received,
participant characteristics and HPOG
experiences, and participant outputs
and outcomes.
The goal of HPOG-Impact is to
evaluate the effectiveness of approaches
used by 20 of the HPOG grantees to
provide TANF recipients and other
low-income individuals with
opportunities for education, training
and advancement within the health care
field. HPOG-Impact also is intended to
evaluate variation in participant impact
that may be attributable to different
HPOG program components and
models. The impact study design is a
classic experiment in which eligible
applicants will be randomly assigned to
a treatment group that is offered
participation in HPOG and a control
group that is not permitted to enroll in
HPOG. Data collected from the HPOG
participants served by these 20 grantees
will also be used for the HPOG–NIE
study.
The goal of ISIS is to test a range of
promising career pathways strategies to
promote education, employment, and
self-sufficiency. Three HPOG grantees
are in the ISIS evaluation along with 6
additional non-HPOG sites.
The information collection activities
to be submitted in the next request
package include:
(1) The HPOG–NIE sample frame
questionnaire will ask respondents from
each of the 27 TANF and low-income
HPOG grantees to identify and provide
contact information for potential
respondents to the surveys described in
items 2–4.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
75438
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 245 / Thursday, December 20, 2012 / Notices
(2) The HPOG–NIE grantee survey
will be administered to staff of the 27
TANF and low-income HPOG grantees
and their major collaborators. The
survey will collect information about
the HPOG program context and about
program administration, activities and
services.
(3) The HPOG–NIE survey of HPOG
program management and staff will
collect information from HPOG staff in
the 27 TANF and low-income HPOG
grantee sites about their approaches to
delivering key program services and
activities, as well as beliefs and
attitudes about the HPOG program and
mission and priorities in serving its
target population.
(4) The HPOG–NIE stakeholder/
network survey will collect information
about partner organizations’ and
stakeholders’ roles, responsibilities,
levels of investment, and perceptions of
the viability and productivity of the
program and stakeholder network in all
27 TANF and low-income HPOG
grantee sites and the 6 additional nonHPOG ISIS sites.
(5) The HPOG–NIE employer survey
will collect information about
employers’ perceptions of the overall
healthcare labor market, firm-specific
conditions and hiring practices, and
their perceptions of and experience with
the program in all 27 TANF and lowincome HPOG grantee sites and the 6
additional non-HPOG ISIS sites.
(6) HPOG-Impact in-person
implementation interviews with HPOG
personnel will collect information about
the grantees’ rationale for applying for
HPOG funding, administrative
challenges, and challenges
implementing programs as planned, as
well as information about staff roles and
responsibilities and perceptions of the
program. The study will use the
interviews to supplement and validate
sections of the HPOG–NIE grantee
survey (described above) in the 27
TANF and low-income HPOG grantee
sites.
(7) HPOG-Impact additional in-person
implementation interviews with HPOG
personnel at systematic variation
grantees will collect information about
the implementation of HPOG program
components that may be associated with
variation in participant impacts in the
27 TANF and low-income HPOG
grantee sites.
(8) The HPOG-Impact follow-up
survey of both treatment and control
group members will be administered
approximately 15 months after baseline
data collection and random assignment.
The survey will collect data about
outcomes of interest, including
certifications and educational
achievements, job placement, wages,
and benefits. It also will collect some
information about HPOG participants’
tenure and experience in HPOG
programming in all 20 HPOG Impact
sites.
(9) The HPOG–NIE supplemental
participant follow-up survey will be the
same as the instrument developed for
the HPOG-Impact follow-up survey but
will be administered to participants
from the four HPOG grantees focused on
TANF recipients and other low-income
individuals that are not included in the
HPOG-Impact study or the Innovative
Strategies for Increasing Self-Sufficiency
(ISIS) project.
Data collection activities to submit in
a future information collection request
include: (10) The HPOG–NIE follow-up
stakeholder/network survey; (11) the
HPOG-Impact second follow-up survey
of both treatment and control group
members; (12) the HPOG–NIE second
supplemental participant follow-up
survey; (13) HPOG-Impact follow-up
data collection on children of HPOGImpact study participants; and (14) the
HPOG–NIE in-person interviews with
HPOG managers and staff.
Respondents: Individuals enrolled in
HPOG interventions; control group
members; HPOG program managers;
HPOG program staff, including
instructors and case managers;
representatives of partner agencies and
stakeholders, including support service
providers, education and vocational
training providers, Workforce
Investment Boards, TANF agencies, and
local health care employers.
ANNUAL RESPONSE BURDEN ESTIMATES
[This information collection request is for a two-year period]
Total number
of respondents
Instrument
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average burden
hours per
response
54
135
1
1
4
0.67
216
90
108
45
540
610
244
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
270
305
122
135
153
61
216
1
1
216
108
100
3,416
1
1
1
.75
100
2562
50
1281
1708
600
1
1
0.5
0.75
854
450
427
225
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
1. HPOG–NIE sample frame questionnaire ......................
2. HPOG–NIE grantee survey ...........................................
3. HPOG–NIE survey of HPOG program management
and staff ..........................................................................
4. HPOG–NIE stakeholder/network survey .......................
5. HPOG–NIE employer survey .........................................
6. HPOG-Impact in-person implementation interviews
with HPOG personnel ....................................................
7. HPOG-Impact additional in-person implementation
interviews with HPOG personnel at systematic variation grantees .................................................................
8a. HPOG-Impact follow-up survey of HPOG participants
8b. HPOG-Impact follow-up survey of control group
members .........................................................................
9. HPOG–NIE supplemental participant follow-up survey
Estimated Annual Response Burden
Hours: 2,593.
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506 (c) (2) (A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), Department of Health
and Human Services, is soliciting public
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 Dec 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
comment on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded in writing
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research
and Evaluation, 370 L’Enfant
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total burden
hours
Annual burden
hours
Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447,
Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer.
Email address:
OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All
requests should be identified by the title
of the information collection.
The Department specifically requests
comments on: (a) Whether the proposed
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 245 / Thursday, December 20, 2012 / Notices
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Robert Sargis,
ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–30686 Filed 12–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0482]
Guidances for Industry and
Investigators on Safety Reporting
Requirements for Investigational New
Drug Applications and Bioavailability/
Bioequivalence Studies, and a Small
Entity Compliance Guide; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of two guidances for
industry and investigators entitled
‘‘Safety Reporting Requirements for
INDs and BA/BE Studies’’ and ‘‘Safety
Reporting Requirements for INDs and
BA/BE Studies—Small Entity
Compliance Guide.’’ These guidances
are intended to help sponsors and
investigators comply with the
requirements in the final rule entitled
‘‘Investigational New Drug Safety
Reporting Requirements for Human
Drug and Biological Products and Safety
Reporting Requirements for
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Studies in Humans,’’ published in the
Federal Register on September 29, 2010
(75 FR 59935). FDA has prepared the
Small Entity Compliance Guide in
accordance with the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. It
is intended to help small businesses
understand and comply with the
regulations issued by FDA concerning
safety reporting requirements for
investigational new drug applications
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 Dec 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
(IND) and bioavailability (BA) and
bioequivalence (BE) studies.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the guidances to the
Office of Communications, Division of
Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002; or the
Office of Communication, Outreach, and
Development (HFM–40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville,
MD 20852–1448. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your requests. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the guidance
documents.
Submit electronic comments on the
guidances to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Shapley, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6352,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–4836; or Stephen Ripley, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(HFM–17), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike,
suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852–1448,
301–827–6210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
two guidances for industry and
investigators entitled ‘‘Safety Reporting
Requirements for INDs and BA/BE
Studies’’ and ‘‘Safety Reporting
Requirements for INDs and BA/BE
Studies—Small Entity Compliance
Guide.’’ These guidances are intended
to help sponsors and investigators
comply with the requirements for IND
safety reporting and safety reporting for
BA and BE studies. In addition, the
Small Entity Compliance Guide is
intended to help small businesses
understand and comply with the
regulations issued by FDA concerning
the safety reporting requirements for
INDs and BA/BE studies. FDA has
prepared the Small Entity Compliance
Guide in accordance with section 212 of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75439
On September 29, 2010, FDA
published a final rule amending the IND
safety reporting requirements under 21
CFR part 312 and adding safety
reporting requirements for persons
conducting BA and BE studies under 21
CFR part 320. The requirements in the
final rule are intended to improve the
utility and quality of safety reports,
expedite and strengthen FDA’s ability to
review critical safety information, and
better protect human subjects enrolled
in clinical trials. FDA also published a
draft guidance entitled ‘‘Safety
Reporting Requirements for INDs and
BA/BE Studies’’ on September 29, 2010
(75 FR 60129), and the public was
provided with an opportunity to
comment on it until December 28, 2010.
FDA carefully considered all of the
comments received in developing the
final guidance. The final guidance
includes clarifications and additional
detail regarding the draft guidance
topics as well additional information on
safety reporting issues raised in the
comments.
The final guidance entitled ‘‘Safety
Reporting Requirements for INDs and
BA/BE Studies’’ contains the definitions
used for IND safety reporting, makes
recommendations on when and how to
submit a safety report, and provides
advice on other safety reporting issues
that have generated questions from
sponsors and investigators.
The Small Entity Compliance Guide
provides answers to many frequently
asked questions FDA has received from
investigators and sponsors regarding the
safety reporting requirements that are
applicable to small entities.
In addition, on June 7, 2011, the
Agency published a guidance describing
enforcement discretion with the
reporting requirements until September
28, 2011, to allow sponsors additional
time to make process changes to
implement the final rule (76 FR 32863;
June 7, 2011). At this time, the Agency
is withdrawing this guidance.
These guidances are being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidances represent the Agency’s
current thinking on safety reporting
requirements for IND and BA/BE
studies. They do not create or confer
any rights for or on any person and do
not operate to bind FDA or the public.
An alternative approach may be used if
such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
written comments regarding these
documents to the Division of Dockets
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 245 (Thursday, December 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75437-75439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30686]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request
Title: Health Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG) program.
OMB No.: 0970-0394.
Description: The Administration for Children and Families (ACF),
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is proposing data
collection activities as part of the Health Profession Opportunity
Grants (HPOG) program. ACF has developed a multi-pronged research and
evaluation approach for the HPOG program to better understand and
assess the activities conducted and their results. The proposed data
collection activities described in this notice will provide data for
three evaluation components, the National Implementation Evaluation of
the Health Profession Opportunity Grants to Serve TANF Recipients and
Other Low-Income Individuals (HPOG-NIE) and the Impact Studies of the
Health Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG-Impact), and the Innovative
Strategies for Increasing Self Sufficiency (ISIS) evaluation.
Two data collection efforts related to HPOG research were approved
by OMB, including approval of a Performance Reporting System (PRS)
(approved September 2011) and for collection of additional baseline
data for the HPOG-Impact study (approved October 2012). One data
collection of ISIS was approved (November 2011) and follow up data
collection instruments are currently under review.
This 60-day notice describes the remaining data collection efforts
for both HPOG-NIE and HPOG-Impact. Two of the proposed instruments will
collect data from all of the ISIS sites. Information collection
described under 1 through 9 will be included in the next OMB submission
for review. Information collections 10 through 14 will be submitted in
a future information collection clearance request.
The goal of HPOG-NIE is to describe and assess the implementation,
systems change, and outcomes and other important information about the
operations of the 27 HPOG grantees focused on TANF recipients and other
low-income individuals. To achieve these goals, it is necessary to
collect data about the HPOG program designs and implementation, HPOG
partner and program networks and indicators of systems change,
employers' perceptions of HPOG programs, the composition and intensity
of HPOG services received, participant characteristics and HPOG
experiences, and participant outputs and outcomes.
The goal of HPOG-Impact is to evaluate the effectiveness of
approaches used by 20 of the HPOG grantees to provide TANF recipients
and other low[hyphen]income individuals with opportunities for
education, training and advancement within the health care field. HPOG-
Impact also is intended to evaluate variation in participant impact
that may be attributable to different HPOG program components and
models. The impact study design is a classic experiment in which
eligible applicants will be randomly assigned to a treatment group that
is offered participation in HPOG and a control group that is not
permitted to enroll in HPOG. Data collected from the HPOG participants
served by these 20 grantees will also be used for the HPOG-NIE study.
The goal of ISIS is to test a range of promising career pathways
strategies to promote education, employment, and self-sufficiency.
Three HPOG grantees are in the ISIS evaluation along with 6 additional
non-HPOG sites.
The information collection activities to be submitted in the next
request package include:
(1) The HPOG-NIE sample frame questionnaire will ask respondents
from each of the 27 TANF and low-income HPOG grantees to identify and
provide contact information for potential respondents to the surveys
described in items 2-4.
[[Page 75438]]
(2) The HPOG-NIE grantee survey will be administered to staff of
the 27 TANF and low-income HPOG grantees and their major collaborators.
The survey will collect information about the HPOG program context and
about program administration, activities and services.
(3) The HPOG-NIE survey of HPOG program management and staff will
collect information from HPOG staff in the 27 TANF and low-income HPOG
grantee sites about their approaches to delivering key program services
and activities, as well as beliefs and attitudes about the HPOG program
and mission and priorities in serving its target population.
(4) The HPOG-NIE stakeholder/network survey will collect
information about partner organizations' and stakeholders' roles,
responsibilities, levels of investment, and perceptions of the
viability and productivity of the program and stakeholder network in
all 27 TANF and low-income HPOG grantee sites and the 6 additional non-
HPOG ISIS sites.
(5) The HPOG-NIE employer survey will collect information about
employers' perceptions of the overall healthcare labor market, firm-
specific conditions and hiring practices, and their perceptions of and
experience with the program in all 27 TANF and low-income HPOG grantee
sites and the 6 additional non-HPOG ISIS sites.
(6) HPOG-Impact in-person implementation interviews with HPOG
personnel will collect information about the grantees' rationale for
applying for HPOG funding, administrative challenges, and challenges
implementing programs as planned, as well as information about staff
roles and responsibilities and perceptions of the program. The study
will use the interviews to supplement and validate sections of the
HPOG-NIE grantee survey (described above) in the 27 TANF and low-income
HPOG grantee sites.
(7) HPOG-Impact additional in-person implementation interviews with
HPOG personnel at systematic variation grantees will collect
information about the implementation of HPOG program components that
may be associated with variation in participant impacts in the 27 TANF
and low-income HPOG grantee sites.
(8) The HPOG-Impact follow-up survey of both treatment and control
group members will be administered approximately 15 months after
baseline data collection and random assignment. The survey will collect
data about outcomes of interest, including certifications and
educational achievements, job placement, wages, and benefits. It also
will collect some information about HPOG participants' tenure and
experience in HPOG programming in all 20 HPOG Impact sites.
(9) The HPOG-NIE supplemental participant follow-up survey will be
the same as the instrument developed for the HPOG-Impact follow-up
survey but will be administered to participants from the four HPOG
grantees focused on TANF recipients and other low[hyphen]income
individuals that are not included in the HPOG-Impact study or the
Innovative Strategies for Increasing Self-Sufficiency (ISIS) project.
Data collection activities to submit in a future information
collection request include: (10) The HPOG-NIE follow-up stakeholder/
network survey; (11) the HPOG-Impact second follow-up survey of both
treatment and control group members; (12) the HPOG-NIE second
supplemental participant follow-up survey; (13) HPOG-Impact follow-up
data collection on children of HPOG-Impact study participants; and (14)
the HPOG-NIE in-person interviews with HPOG managers and staff.
Respondents: Individuals enrolled in HPOG interventions; control
group members; HPOG program managers; HPOG program staff, including
instructors and case managers; representatives of partner agencies and
stakeholders, including support service providers, education and
vocational training providers, Workforce Investment Boards, TANF
agencies, and local health care employers.
Annual Response Burden Estimates
[This information collection request is for a two-year period]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Instrument Total number responses per hours per Total burden Annual burden
of respondents respondent response hours hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. HPOG-NIE sample frame 54 1 4 216 108
questionnaire..................
2. HPOG-NIE grantee survey...... 135 1 0.67 90 45
3. HPOG-NIE survey of HPOG 540 1 0.5 270 135
program management and staff...
4. HPOG-NIE stakeholder/network 610 1 0.5 305 153
survey.........................
5. HPOG-NIE employer survey..... 244 1 0.5 122 61
6. HPOG-Impact in-person 216 1 1 216 108
implementation interviews with
HPOG personnel.................
7. HPOG-Impact additional in- 100 1 1 100 50
person implementation
interviews with HPOG personnel
at systematic variation
grantees.......................
8a. HPOG-Impact follow-up survey 3,416 1 .75 2562 1281
of HPOG participants...........
8b. HPOG-Impact follow-up survey 1708 1 0.5 854 427
of control group members.......
9. HPOG-NIE supplemental 600 1 0.75 450 225
participant follow-up survey...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Annual Response Burden Hours: 2,593.
In compliance with the requirement of section 3506 (c) (2) (A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Administration for Children
and Families (ACF), Department of Health and Human Services, is
soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information
collection described above. Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and comments may be forwarded in writing to
the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning,
Research and Evaluation, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., Washington, DC
20447, Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer. Email address:
OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be identified by
the title of the information collection.
The Department specifically requests comments on: (a) Whether the
proposed
[[Page 75439]]
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted within 60 days of this publication.
Robert Sargis,
ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-30686 Filed 12-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-09-P
