Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Fredericksburg 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area Revision to Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets, 75386-75388 [2012-30103]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
75386
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 245 / Thursday, December 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by February 19, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxides, Ozone, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 10, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. The table in § 52.770 paragraph (e)
is amended by adding an entry in
alphabetical order for ‘‘Muncie 1997 8hour ozone maintenance plan’’ to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.770
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Title
Indiana date
EPA approval
Explanation
*
*
Muncie 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance
plan.
*
.....................
*
*
12/20/12 [INSERT PAGE NUMBER
WHERE THE DOCUMENT BEGINS].
*
*
Revision to motor vehicle emission budgets.
*
*
*
3. Section 52.777 is amended by
redesignating the existing paragraph (cc)
as paragraph (cc)(1) and by adding
paragraph (cc)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.777 Control Strategy: Photochemical
oxidants (hydrocarbons).
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
*
*
*
*
*
(cc) * * *
(2) Approval—On August 17, 2012,
Indiana submitted a request to revise the
approved MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle
emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997
8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the
Delaware County (Muncie), Indiana
area. The budgets are being revised with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Dec 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
*
*
budgets developed with the
MOVES2010a model. The 2015 budgets
for Delaware County, Indiana are 2.53
tons per day volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and 7.02 tons per
day nitrogen oxides (NOX).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–30439 Filed 12–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0444; FRL–9760–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Fredericksburg 8-Hour Ozone
Maintenance Area Revision to
Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 245 / Thursday, December 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Final rule; correcting
amendment.
ACTION:
This document corrects an
error in the rule language of a final rule
pertaining to EPA’s approval of the
revised motor vehicle emissions budgets
(MVEBs) for the Fredericksburg 8-Hour
Ozone Maintenance Area
(Fredericksburg Area). The previous
rulemaking updated the 2009 and 2015
MVEBs using EPA’s Motor Vehicle
Emissions Simulator emissions model
(MOVES2010a).
DATES: This correcting amendment is
effective December 20, 2012 and is
applicable beginning November 28,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Becoat, (215) 814–2036, or by
email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 29, 2012 (77 FR 65490), EPA
published a final rulemaking action
announcing approval of updated MVEBs
for the Fredericksburg Area. The
document inadvertently removed
historical information in section
52.2420(e) concerning the underlying 8Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan for the
Fredericksburg Area. The document also
listed incorrect emissions budgets in
section 52.2424(c) for the
Fredericksburg Area. This action
corrects these oversights.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because we are merely
correcting an incorrect citation in a
previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that
this constitutes good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a significant regulatory
action and is therefore not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 Fed. Reg.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Dec 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because the
agency has made a good cause finding
that this action is not subject to noticeand-comment requirements under the
Administrative Procedures Act or any
other statute as indicated in the
Supplementary Information section
above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), or
to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Pub. L. 104–4). In addition, this action
does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate,
as described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. This rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant. This technical
correction action does not involve
technical standards; thus the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings issued under the
executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75387
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, EPA had
made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date of
November 28, 2012. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This correction to
40 CFR 52.2424 for the Commonwealth
of Virginia is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Accordingly, in 40 CFR part 52, the
following correcting amendments are
made:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR
part 52 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV—Virginia
2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by revising the entry for
the 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan for
the Fredericksburg Area to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2420
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) EPA-approved nonregulatory and
quasi-regulatory material.
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
75388
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 245 / Thursday, December 20, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Name of non-regulatory SIP
revision
Applicable geographic area
State submittal
date
*
*
*
8-Hour Ozone Maintenance
City of Fredericksburg, SpotPlan for the Fredericksburg
sylvania County, and StafArea.
ford County.
................................................
*
*
3. Section 52.2424 paragraph (c) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 52.2424
budgets.
9/26/11
*
*
*
12/23/05, 70 FR 76165.
*
Additional explanation
*
12/20/12 [Insert page number
where the document begins].
*
*
(c) EPA approves the following
revised 2009 and 2015 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the
Fredericksburg 8-Hour Ozone
Maintenance Area submitted by the
Motor vehicle emissions
*
5/4/05
*
■
*
*
EPA approval date
*
Revised 2009 and 2015
motor vehicle emission
budgets for NOX.
*
*
Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality (VADEQ) on September 26,
2011:
Applicable geographic area
Fredericksburg Area (Spotsylvania and Stafford Counties and City of Fredericksburg) ........................................
Fredericksburg Area (Spotsylvania and Stafford Counties and City of Fredericksburg) ........................................
Dated: November 27, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012–30103 Filed 12–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–0AR–2011–1004; FRL–9676–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Colorado; Motor Vehicle Inspection
and Maintenance Program—Deletion of
Final Enhanced Inspection and
Maintenance Emission Cutpoint
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision that
was submitted by the State of Colorado
on August 8, 2006. The August 8, 2006,
revision updates Regulation Number 11,
‘‘Motor Vehicle Emissions Inspection
Program,’’ by removing the light duty
vehicle emission testing limits that went
into effect on January 1, 2006, for 1996
and newer model year vehicles. This
action is being taken under section 110
of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective January 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Dec 19, 2012
Jkt 229001
Tons per day
(TPD) NOX
Year
2009
2015
19.615
12.933
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2011–1004. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
(i) The word Act or initials CAA mean
or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our
mean or refer to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials NAAQS mean
national ambient air quality standard.
(iv) The initials ppb mean parts per
billion.
(v) The initials SIP mean or refer to
State Implementation Plan.
(vi) The words State or Colorado
mean the State of Colorado, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
Rebecca Russo, Air Program, Mailcode
8P–AR, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129,
telephone number (303) 312–6757, fax
number (303) 312–6064, or email
russo.rebecca@epa.gov.
On January 12, 2012, EPA published
a proposed rule in the Federal Register
in which we proposed approval of a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision that was submitted by the State
of Colorado on August 8, 2006, and
provided an opportunity for public
comment through February 13, 2012
(see 77 FR 1892). The SIP revision
updates Colorado’s Regulation Number
11, ‘‘Motor Vehicle Emissions
Inspection Program,’’ by removing the
light duty vehicle emission testing
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, the
following definitions apply:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. What is the purpose of this action?
III. What is the State’s process to submit SIP
revisions to EPA?
IV. EPA’s Evaluation of the State’s August 8,
2006, Submittal
V. Consideration of Section 110(l) of the
Clean Air Act
VI. Final Action
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 245 (Thursday, December 20, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75386-75388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30103]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0444; FRL-9760-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Virginia; Fredericksburg 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area Revision to
Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
[[Page 75387]]
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the rule language of a
final rule pertaining to EPA's approval of the revised motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Fredericksburg 8-Hour Ozone
Maintenance Area (Fredericksburg Area). The previous rulemaking updated
the 2009 and 2015 MVEBs using EPA's Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator
emissions model (MOVES2010a).
DATES: This correcting amendment is effective December 20, 2012 and is
applicable beginning November 28, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Becoat, (215) 814-2036, or by
email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 29, 2012 (77 FR 65490), EPA
published a final rulemaking action announcing approval of updated
MVEBs for the Fredericksburg Area. The document inadvertently removed
historical information in section 52.2420(e) concerning the underlying
8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan for the Fredericksburg Area. The document
also listed incorrect emissions budgets in section 52.2424(c) for the
Fredericksburg Area. This action corrects these oversights.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because we are merely correcting
an incorrect citation in a previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is not a significant regulatory action and is therefore not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 Fed. Reg. 28355 (May 22, 2001)).
Because the agency has made a good cause finding that this action is
not subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
governments, as specified by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
This technical correction action does not involve technical standards;
thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
The rule also does not involve special consideration of environmental
justice related issues as required by Executive Order 12898 (59 FR
7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729,
February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of the rule
in accordance with the Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings issued
under the executive order. This rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of November
28, 2012. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to
40 CFR 52.2424 for the Commonwealth of Virginia is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Accordingly, in 40 CFR part 52, the following correcting amendments
are made:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV--Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2420, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by revising
the entry for the 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan for the Fredericksburg
Area to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2420 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) EPA-approved nonregulatory and quasi-regulatory material.
[[Page 75388]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable State Additional
revision geographic area submittal date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan for City of 5/4/05 12/23/05, 70 FR
the Fredericksburg Area. Fredericksburg, 76165.
Spotsylvania
County, and
Stafford County.
................... 9/26/11 12/20/12 [Insert Revised 2009 and
page number where 2015 motor vehicle
the document emission budgets
begins]. for NOX.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
3. Section 52.2424 paragraph (c) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2424 Motor vehicle emissions budgets.
* * * * *
(c) EPA approves the following revised 2009 and 2015 motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Fredericksburg 8-Hour Ozone
Maintenance Area submitted by the Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality (VADEQ) on September 26, 2011:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tons per day
Applicable geographic area Year (TPD) NOX
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fredericksburg Area (Spotsylvania and 2009 19.615
Stafford Counties and City of
Fredericksburg)........................
Fredericksburg Area (Spotsylvania and 2015 12.933
Stafford Counties and City of
Fredericksburg)........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: November 27, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012-30103 Filed 12-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
