Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance: Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products, 75171-75173 [2012-30513]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 19, 2012 / Notices
10.3109/17435390.2011.648223.
Sung JH, Ji HJ, Yoon JU, Kim DS, Song MY,
Jeong J, Han BS, Han JH, Chung YH, Kim
J, Kim TS, Chang HK, Lee EJ, Lee JH, Yu
IJ [2008]. Lung function changes in
Sprague-Dawley rats after prolonged
inhalation exposure to silver
nanoparticles. Inhalation Toxicol
20:567–574.
Sung JH, Ji, JH, Park JD, Yoon, JU, Kim DS,
Jeon KS, Song MY, Jeong J, Han BS, Han
JE, Chung YH, Chang HK, Lee JH, Cho
MH, Kelman BJ, Yu IJ [2009]. Subchronic
inhalation toxicity of silver
nanoparticles. Toxicol Sci 108:452–461.
Dated: December 12, 2012.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012–30515 Filed 12–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
Comment Request
Title: Mother and Infant Home
Visiting Program Evaluation—Strong
Start: Data collection.
Description: In September 2012, the
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
and the Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA) within the U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) launched an evaluation
called the Mother and Infant Home
Visiting Program Evaluation—Strong
Start (MIHOPE—Strong Start). The
study will evaluate the effectiveness of
two evidence-based home visiting
models—Healthy Families America and
Nurse Family Partnership—at
improving birth outcomes for women
who are enrolled in Medicaid. The
evaluation is part of the Strong Start for
Mothers and Newborns initiative, which
is informing the federal government
about the effects of prenatal
interventions that may provide better
care, improved health, and reduced
medical costs by improving birth
outcomes.
Data collected for MIHOPE-Strong
Start will include the following: (1) A
20-minute baseline family survey, (2)
two-hour semi-structured interviews
with state administrators of the
Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood
Home Visiting program, (3) web-based
surveys with program managers of local
home visiting programs, and (4) webbased surveys with home visitors in
those programs. In addition, the study
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Dec 18, 2012
Jkt 229001
will collect information on dosage and
referrals from home visiting programs’
management information systems, and
will collect information on family
outcomes from state and vital records
systems.
These data will be combined with
administrative data to estimate the
effects of the home visiting programs on
birth outcomes and infant health and
health care in the first year, both overall
and for groups of families and programs.
Data on program implementation will
provide information on how local
programs operate and the dosage of
home visiting services that families
receive.
Respondents: The respondents will
include 20,000 women who are no more
than seven months pregnant when they
enter the study, 8 state administrators,
68 program managers, and 782 home
visitors. Data collection activities will
take place over a three-year period. The
annual burden on the public for these
activities is estimated to be 2,435 hours
over a three year period (approximately
21 minutes per person over three years).
Copies of the proposed instruments
and brief project description may be
obtained by writing to the
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research
and Evaluation, 370 L’Enfant
Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447,
Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer.
All requests should be identified by the
title of the information collection. Email
address:
OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov.
The Department specifically requests
comments on (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment is best assured of having
its full effect if it is received within 30
days of this publication. Written
comments and recommendations for the
proposed information collection should
be sent directly to Administration for
Children and Families, Office of
Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370
L’Enfant Promenade SW., Washington,
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75171
DC 20447, Attn: OPRE Reports
Clearance Officer.
Steven M. Hanmer,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–30367 Filed 12–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–22–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0976]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Guidance:
Emergency Use Authorization of
Medical Products
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by January 18,
2013.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, Fax: 202–
395–7285, or emailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0595. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
SUMMARY:
Ila
S. Mizrachi, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–
400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–
7726, Ila.Mizrachi@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Reporting and Recordkeeping for
Emergency Use Authorization of
Medical Products (OMB Control
Number 0910–0595)—Extension
The guidance describes the Agency’s
general recommendations and
procedures for issuance of emergency
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
75172
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 19, 2012 / Notices
use authorizations (EUA) under section
564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360bbb–3), which was amended by the
Project BioShield Act of 2004 (Pub. L.
108–276). The FD&C Act permits the
Commissioner to authorize the use of
unapproved medical products or
unapproved uses of approved medical
products during an emergency declared
under section 564 of the FD&C Act. The
data to support issuance of an EUA
must demonstrate that, based on the
totality of the scientific evidence
available to the Commissioner,
including data from adequate and wellcontrolled clinical trials (if available), it
is reasonable to believe that the product
may be effective in diagnosing, treating,
or preventing a serious or lifethreatening disease or condition (21
U.S.C. 360bbb–3(c)). Although the exact
type and amount of data needed to
support an EUA may vary depending on
the nature of the declared emergency
and the nature of the candidate product,
FDA recommends that a request for
consideration for an EUA include
scientific evidence evaluating the
product’s safety and effectiveness,
including the adverse event profile for
diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of
the serious or life-threatening disease or
condition, as well as data and other
information on safety, effectiveness,
risks and benefits, and (to the extent
available) alternatives.
Under section 564 of the FD&C Act,
the FDA Commissioner may establish
conditions on the authorization. Section
564(e) requires the FDA Commissioner
(to the extent practicable given the
circumstances of the emergency) to
establish certain conditions on an
authorization that the Commissioner
finds necessary or appropriate to protect
the public health and permits the
Commissioner to establish other
conditions that she finds necessary or
appropriate to protect the public health.
Conditions authorized by section 564(e)
of the FD&C Act include, for example:
Requirements for information
dissemination to health care providers
or authorized dispensers and product
recipients; adverse event monitoring
and reporting; data collection and
analysis; recordkeeping and records
access; restrictions on product
advertising, distribution, and
administration; and limitations on good
manufacturing practices requirements.
Some conditions, the statute specifies,
are mandatory to the extent practicable
for authorizations of unapproved
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Dec 18, 2012
Jkt 229001
products and discretionary for
authorizations of unapproved uses of
approved products. Moreover, some
conditions may apply to manufacturers
of an EUA product, while other
conditions may apply to any person
who carries out any activity for which
the authorization is issued. Section 564
of the FD&C Act also gives the FDA
Commissioner authority to establish
other conditions on an authorization
that she finds to be necessary or
appropriate to protect the public health.
For purposes of estimating the annual
burden of reporting (Table 1), FDA has
established four categories of
respondents as follows: (1) Those who
file a request for FDA to issue an EUA
or a substantive amendment to an EUA
that has previously been issued,
assuming that a requisite declaration
under section 564 of the FD&C Act has
been made and criteria for issuance
have been met; (2) those who submit a
request for FDA to review information/
data (i.e., a pre-EUA package) for a
candidate EUA product or a substantive
amendment to an existing pre-EUA
package for preparedness purposes; (3)
manufacturers who carry out an activity
related to an unapproved EUA product
(e.g., administering product,
disseminating information) who must
report to FDA regarding such activity;
and (4) public health authorities (e.g.,
State, local) who carry out an activity
(e.g, administering product,
disseminating information) related to an
unapproved EUA product who must
report to FDA regarding such activity.
In some cases, manufacturers directly
submit EUA requests. Often a Federal
Government entity (e.g., Center for
Disease Control and Prevention,
Department of Defense) requests that
FDA issue an EUA and submits preEUA packages for FDA to review. In
many of these cases, manufacturer
respondents inform these requests and
submissions, which are the activities
that form the basis of the estimated
reporting burdens. However, in some
cases such as with antimicrobial
products for which there are multiple
generic manufacturers, the Federal
Government is the sole respondent;
manufacturers do not inform these
requests or submissions. FDA estimates
minimal burden when the Federal
Government performs the relevant
activities. In addition to variability
based on whether there is an active
manufacturer respondent, other factors
also inject significant variability in
estimates for annual reporting burdens.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A second factor is the type of product.
For example, FDA estimates greater
burden for novel therapeutics than for
certain unapproved uses of approved
products. A third significant factor that
injects variability is the type of
submission. For example, FDA
estimates greater burden for ‘‘original’’
EUA and pre-EUA submissions than for
amendments to them, and FDA
estimates minimal burden to issue an
EUA when there is a previously
reviewed pre-EUA package or
investigational application. For
purposes of estimating the reporting
burden, FDA has calculated the
anticipated burden on manufacturers
based on the anticipated types of
responses (i.e., estimated manufacturer
input), types of product, and types of
submission that comprise the described
reporting activities.
For purposes of estimating the annual
burden of recordkeeping, FDA has also
calculated the anticipated burden on
manufacturers and public health
officials associated with administration
of unapproved products authorized for
emergency use, recognizing that the
Federal Government will perform much
of the recordkeeping related to
administration of such products (see
Table 2 of this document).
In the Federal Register of October 1,
2012 (77 FR 59926), FDA published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. No comments were
received.
No burden was attributed to reporting
or recordkeeping for unapproved uses of
approved products, since those products
are already subject to approved
collections of information (i.e., Adverse
Experience Reporting for Biological
Products is approved under 0910–0308
through November 30, 2014; Adverse
Drug Experience Reporting is approved
under 0910–0230 through August 31,
2015; Adverse Device Experience
Reporting is approved under OMB
control number 0910–0471 through May
31, 2014; Investigational New Drug
(IND) Application Regulations are
approved under 0910–0014 through
April 30, 2015, and Investigational
Device Exemption (IDE) Reporting is
approved under OMB control number
0910–0078 through February 28, 2013.
Any additional burden imposed by this
proposed collection would be minimal.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
75173
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 19, 2012 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Type of respondent
Total annual
responses
Average
burden per
response
Total hours
Requests to Issue an EUA or a Substantive Amendment
to an Existing EUA .........................................................
FDA Review of a Pre-EUA Package or an Amendment
Thereto ...........................................................................
Manufacturers of an Unapproved EUA Product ................
Public Health Authorities; Unapproved EUA Product ........
9
1.33
12
33
396
11
5
30
1.45
1.6
3
16
8
90
35
2
2
560
16
180
Total ............................................................................
........................
..........................
........................
........................
1,152
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
Type of respondent
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
Total hours
Manufacturers of an Unapproved EUA Product ................
Public Health Authorities; Unapproved EUA Product ........
5
30
1.6
3
8
90
25
3
200
270
Total ............................................................................
........................
..........................
........................
........................
470
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Dated: December 13, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
assessment will be conducted by an
independent contractor in two phases.
FDA is providing a period of 30 days for
public comment on the statement of
work before requesting proposals for the
assessment.
[FR Doc. 2012–30513 Filed 12–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
Submit electronic or written
comments by February 4, 2013.
DATES:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–1202]
Comprehensive Assessment of the
Process for the Review of Device
Submissions; Request for Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice; request for comments.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
statement of work for an assessment of
the process for the review of medical
device submissions. The assessment is
part of the FDA performance
commitments relating to the Medical
Device User Fee Amendments of 2012
(MDUFA III), which reauthorized device
user fees for fiscal years 2013–2017. The
assessment is described in section V,
‘‘Independent Assessment of Review
Process Management’’, of the
commitment letter entitled ‘‘MDUFA
Performance Goals and Procedures’’ 1
(MDUFA III Commitment Letter). The
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
1 https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/
NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/
UCM295454.pdf.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:26 Dec 18, 2012
Jkt 229001
Submit electronic
comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. All
comments received may be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
ADDRESSES:
Food and Drug Administration
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amber Sligar, Office of Planning, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, rm. 3291,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–9384, Amber.Sligar@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 9, 2012, President Obama
signed into law the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Act (Pub. L. 112–144) (FDASIA).2 Title
II of FDASIA is MDUFA III, which gives
FDA the authority to collect device user
fees from industry for fiscal years (FYs)
2013 to 2017. MDUFA III took effect on
October 1, 2012, and will sunset in 5
years on October 1, 2017.
Device user fees were first established
by Congress in 2002. Medical device
companies pay fees to FDA when they
register their establishment and list their
devices with the Agency, whenever they
submit an application or a notification
to market a new medical device in the
United States, and for certain other
types of submissions. Under MDUFA III,
FDA is authorized to collect user fees
that will total approximately $595
million (plus adjustments for inflation)
over 5 years. With this additional
funding, FDA will be able to hire more
than 200 full-time-equivalent workers
over the course of MDUFA III. In
exchange, FDA has committed to meet
certain performance goals outlined in
the MDUFA III Commitment Letter.
II. Assessment of FDA’s Process for the
Review of Device Submissions
Section V of the MDUFA III
Commitment Letter states that FDA and
the device industry will participate in a
comprehensive assessment of the
process for the review of device
applications. The assessment will
include consultation with both FDA and
industry. The assessment will be
conducted in two phases by a private,
independent consulting firm, under
2 https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW112publ144/pdf/PLAW-112publ144.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75171-75173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30513]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0976]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance: Emergency
Use Authorization of Medical Products
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by January
18, 2013.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
Fax: 202-395-7285, or emailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0595.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B,
Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-7726, Ila.Mizrachi@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Reporting and Recordkeeping for Emergency Use Authorization of Medical
Products (OMB Control Number 0910-0595)--Extension
The guidance describes the Agency's general recommendations and
procedures for issuance of emergency
[[Page 75172]]
use authorizations (EUA) under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3), which was amended
by the Project BioShield Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-276). The FD&C Act
permits the Commissioner to authorize the use of unapproved medical
products or unapproved uses of approved medical products during an
emergency declared under section 564 of the FD&C Act. The data to
support issuance of an EUA must demonstrate that, based on the totality
of the scientific evidence available to the Commissioner, including
data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials (if available),
it is reasonable to believe that the product may be effective in
diagnosing, treating, or preventing a serious or life-threatening
disease or condition (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3(c)). Although the exact type
and amount of data needed to support an EUA may vary depending on the
nature of the declared emergency and the nature of the candidate
product, FDA recommends that a request for consideration for an EUA
include scientific evidence evaluating the product's safety and
effectiveness, including the adverse event profile for diagnosis,
treatment, or prevention of the serious or life-threatening disease or
condition, as well as data and other information on safety,
effectiveness, risks and benefits, and (to the extent available)
alternatives.
Under section 564 of the FD&C Act, the FDA Commissioner may
establish conditions on the authorization. Section 564(e) requires the
FDA Commissioner (to the extent practicable given the circumstances of
the emergency) to establish certain conditions on an authorization that
the Commissioner finds necessary or appropriate to protect the public
health and permits the Commissioner to establish other conditions that
she finds necessary or appropriate to protect the public health.
Conditions authorized by section 564(e) of the FD&C Act include, for
example: Requirements for information dissemination to health care
providers or authorized dispensers and product recipients; adverse
event monitoring and reporting; data collection and analysis;
recordkeeping and records access; restrictions on product advertising,
distribution, and administration; and limitations on good manufacturing
practices requirements. Some conditions, the statute specifies, are
mandatory to the extent practicable for authorizations of unapproved
products and discretionary for authorizations of unapproved uses of
approved products. Moreover, some conditions may apply to manufacturers
of an EUA product, while other conditions may apply to any person who
carries out any activity for which the authorization is issued. Section
564 of the FD&C Act also gives the FDA Commissioner authority to
establish other conditions on an authorization that she finds to be
necessary or appropriate to protect the public health.
For purposes of estimating the annual burden of reporting (Table
1), FDA has established four categories of respondents as follows: (1)
Those who file a request for FDA to issue an EUA or a substantive
amendment to an EUA that has previously been issued, assuming that a
requisite declaration under section 564 of the FD&C Act has been made
and criteria for issuance have been met; (2) those who submit a request
for FDA to review information/data (i.e., a pre-EUA package) for a
candidate EUA product or a substantive amendment to an existing pre-EUA
package for preparedness purposes; (3) manufacturers who carry out an
activity related to an unapproved EUA product (e.g., administering
product, disseminating information) who must report to FDA regarding
such activity; and (4) public health authorities (e.g., State, local)
who carry out an activity (e.g, administering product, disseminating
information) related to an unapproved EUA product who must report to
FDA regarding such activity.
In some cases, manufacturers directly submit EUA requests. Often a
Federal Government entity (e.g., Center for Disease Control and
Prevention, Department of Defense) requests that FDA issue an EUA and
submits pre-EUA packages for FDA to review. In many of these cases,
manufacturer respondents inform these requests and submissions, which
are the activities that form the basis of the estimated reporting
burdens. However, in some cases such as with antimicrobial products for
which there are multiple generic manufacturers, the Federal Government
is the sole respondent; manufacturers do not inform these requests or
submissions. FDA estimates minimal burden when the Federal Government
performs the relevant activities. In addition to variability based on
whether there is an active manufacturer respondent, other factors also
inject significant variability in estimates for annual reporting
burdens. A second factor is the type of product. For example, FDA
estimates greater burden for novel therapeutics than for certain
unapproved uses of approved products. A third significant factor that
injects variability is the type of submission. For example, FDA
estimates greater burden for ``original'' EUA and pre-EUA submissions
than for amendments to them, and FDA estimates minimal burden to issue
an EUA when there is a previously reviewed pre-EUA package or
investigational application. For purposes of estimating the reporting
burden, FDA has calculated the anticipated burden on manufacturers
based on the anticipated types of responses (i.e., estimated
manufacturer input), types of product, and types of submission that
comprise the described reporting activities.
For purposes of estimating the annual burden of recordkeeping, FDA
has also calculated the anticipated burden on manufacturers and public
health officials associated with administration of unapproved products
authorized for emergency use, recognizing that the Federal Government
will perform much of the recordkeeping related to administration of
such products (see Table 2 of this document).
In the Federal Register of October 1, 2012 (77 FR 59926), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. No comments were received.
No burden was attributed to reporting or recordkeeping for
unapproved uses of approved products, since those products are already
subject to approved collections of information (i.e., Adverse
Experience Reporting for Biological Products is approved under 0910-
0308 through November 30, 2014; Adverse Drug Experience Reporting is
approved under 0910-0230 through August 31, 2015; Adverse Device
Experience Reporting is approved under OMB control number 0910-0471
through May 31, 2014; Investigational New Drug (IND) Application
Regulations are approved under 0910-0014 through April 30, 2015, and
Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Reporting is approved under OMB
control number 0910-0078 through February 28, 2013. Any additional
burden imposed by this proposed collection would be minimal.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
[[Page 75173]]
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average
Type of respondent Number of responses per Total annual burden per Total hours
respondents respondent responses response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requests to Issue an EUA or a 9 1.33 12 33 396
Substantive Amendment to an
Existing EUA...................
FDA Review of a Pre-EUA Package 11 1.45 16 35 560
or an Amendment Thereto........
Manufacturers of an Unapproved 5 1.6 8 2 16
EUA Product....................
Public Health Authorities; 30 3 90 2 180
Unapproved EUA Product.........
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 1,152
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average
Type of respondent Number of records per Total annual burden per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeper records recordkeeping
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturers of an Unapproved 5 1.6 8 25 200
EUA Product...................
Public Health Authorities; 30 3 90 3 270
Unapproved EUA Product........
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total...................... .............. ............... .............. .............. 470
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Dated: December 13, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-30513 Filed 12-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P