Proposed Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the State-Route 99/Cartmill Avenue Interchange Improvements Project, City of Tulare, Tulare County, CA, 74504-74506 [2012-30186]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
74504
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 241 / Friday, December 14, 2012 / Notices
Dated: December 10, 2012
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest
Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2012–30182 Filed 12–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2012–N204; FF08E00000–
FXES11120800000F2–123–F2]
Proposed Low-Effect Habitat
Conservation Plan for the State-Route
99/Cartmill Avenue Interchange
Improvements Project, City of Tulare,
Tulare County, CA
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
Notice of availability; request
for comment.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have received
an application from the City of Tulare,
Tulare County, California (applicant),
for a 5-year incidental take permit for
two species under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
The application addresses the potential
for ‘‘take’’ of two listed animals, the
vernal pool fairy shrimp and the San
Joaquin kit fox. The applicant would
implement a conservation strategy
program to avoid, minimize, and
mitigate effects of the project’s covered
activities, as described in the applicant’s
low-effect habitat conservation plan
(HCP). We request comments on the
applicant’s application and plan, and
our preliminary determination that the
plan qualifies as a ‘‘low-effect’’ habitat
conservation plan, eligible for a
categorical exclusion under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (NEPA). We discuss our basis
for this determination in our
environmental action statement (EAS),
also available for public review.
DATES: We must receive written
comments on or before January 14,
2013.
To request further
information or submit written
comments, please use one of the
following methods, and note that your
information request or comment is in
reference to the Low-Effect Habitat
Conservation Plan for the State Route
99/Cartmill Avenue Interchange
Improvements Project, City of Tulare,
Tulare County, California:
• U.S. Mail: Nina Bicknese,
Conservation Planning Division, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Dec 13, 2012
Jkt 229001
Fish and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage
Way, W–2605, Sacramento, CA 95825.
• In-Person Drop-off, Viewing, or
Pickup: Call (916) 414–6600 to make an
appointment during regular business
hours to drop off comments or view
received comments at the address
shown above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Thomas, Chief, Conservation
Planning Division, or Eric Tattersall,
Deputy Assistant Field Supervisor, at
the address shown above or at (916)
414–6600 (telephone). If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf,
please call the Federal Information
Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Documents
You may obtain copies of the permit
application, HCP, and EAS from the
individuals in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Copies of these documents are
also available for public inspection, by
appointment, during regular business
hours, at the Sacramento Fish and
Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES).
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—might be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Background Information
Section 9 of the Act prohibits taking
of fish and wildlife species listed as
endangered or threatened under section
4 of the Act. Under the Act, the term
‘‘take’’ means to harass, harm, pursue,
hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture,
or collect, or to attempt to engage in any
such conduct. The term ‘‘harm’’ is
defined in the regulations as significant
habitat modification or degradation that
results in death or injury of listed
species by significantly impairing
essential behavioral patterns, including
breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR
17.3). The term ‘‘harass’’ is defined in
the regulations as to carry out actions
that create the likelihood of injury to
listed species to such an extent as to
significantly disrupt normal behavioral
patterns, which include, but are not
limited to, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3).
However, under specified
circumstances, the Service may issue
permits that allow the take of federally
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
listed species, provided that the take
that occurs is incidental to, but not the
purpose of, an otherwise lawful activity.
Regulations governing permits for
endangered and threatened species are
at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32, respectively.
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act contains
provisions for issuing such incidental
take permits to non-Federal entities for
the take of endangered and threatened
species, provided the following criteria
are met:
1. The taking will be incidental;
2. The applicants will, to the
maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impact of such taking;
3. The applicants will develop a
proposed HCP and ensure that adequate
funding for the HCP will be provided;
4. The taking will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of the survival
and recovery of the species in the wild;
and
5. The applicants will carry out any
other measures that the Service may
require as being necessary or
appropriate for the purposes of the HCP.
The applicant seeks an incidental take
permit for proposed covered activities
within a 219-acre permit area
surrounding the intersection of State
Route 99 and Cartmill Avenue within
the City of Tulare, Tulare County,
California. The HCP does not include
any unlisted animal species or unlisted
plant species. The following two
federally listed species will be included
as covered species in the applicant’s
proposed HCP:
• San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis
mutica) (endangered)
• Vernal pool fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta lynchi) (threatened)
For these covered species, the
applicants would seek incidental take
authorization. All species included in
the incidental take permit would receive
assurances under our ‘‘No Surprises’’
regulations (50 CFR 17.22(b)(5) and
17.32(b)(5)).
Activities proposed for coverage
under the proposed incidental take
permit (covered-activities) would be
otherwise lawful activities that could
occur consistent with the HCP, to
include, but not be limited to:
• Widen and improve sections of
existing roadway.
• Remove the existing Cartmill
Avenue overpass, remove associated
roadways and associated highway
ramps, and dispose of those materials.
• Store equipment and supplies in a
designated staging area.
• Construct a new Cartmill Avenue
overpass, including a temporary
structure (falsework). Construct new
roadways and new highway ramps
associated with the new overpass.
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 241 / Friday, December 14, 2012 / Notices
• Excavate seven new stormwater
detention basins and dispose of
excavated soil.
• Remove existing vegetation,
including plant roots.
• Grade and re-contour ground,
compact soil, and install road surfaces
(paving).
• Install erosion control structures
(such as silt fencing and barriers).
• Operate heavy equipment
(including, but not limited to,
pneumatic tools, scrapers, bulldozers,
backhoes, heavy trucks, cement trucks,
compactors, and water trucks.
• Control dust by watering soil
surfaces.
• Excavate trenches to install traffic
signals, lighting conduit, streetlights,
and similar facilities.
• Sow native-plant species or other
groundcover to prevent erosion and to
restore areas disturbed by construction
activities.
• Maintain and operate the completed
project, including maintenance watering
of any landscaping vegetation, future
mowing of roadside vegetation, and
future maintenance repairs to the
constructed facilities.
The applicant’s proposed project
would improve the State Route 99/
Cartmill Avenue Interchange
(Interchange) and correct nonstandard
features of the existing Cartmill Avenue
overcrossing. The new Cartmill Avenue
overpass would provide 16.5 feet of
vertical clearance over State Route 99,
compared to the existing 15 feet, and
provide space to accommodate any
future widening of State Route 99. The
approximately 2,700-foot long overpasssection of Cartmill Avenue would be
widened from two lanes (approximately
38-feet wide) to become a six-lane
divided arterial (approximately 128-feet
wide). The new Cartmill Avenue
overpass would transition from six lanes
to the existing two lanes in a 400-foot
section west of M Street, and in a 1,300foot section east of the new Akers Street
intersection/Tulare Irrigation District
Canal crossing. The existing M Street
intersection with Cartmill Avenue
would be improved, and a portion of M
Street would be reconstructed. An
existing highway ramp in the southwest
quadrant of the Interchange would be
removed, realigned, and replaced with a
new ramp. Three additional highway
ramps would be constructed in the other
Interchange quadrants. The existing
frontage road (Road 100) in the
northeast quadrant of the Interchange
would be removed, and a new roadway
(Akers Street) would be constructed in
an area approximately 330 feet to the
east of the existing road. Additional 12inch-deep water detention basins would
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Dec 13, 2012
Jkt 229001
be excavated in each quadrant of the
Interchange. The entire project would be
constructed in a single phase.
The applicant proposes to avoid,
minimize, and mitigate the effects to the
covered species associated with the
covered activities by fully implementing
the conservation strategy described in
the HCP. Avoidance and minimization
measures will include compliance with
our January 2011 document ‘‘U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service Standard
Recommendations for Protection of the
Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to
or During Ground Disturbance.’’ Other
avoidance and minimization measures
include but are not limited to:
• Install barrier fencing around the
entire work area.
• Install barrier fences around
seasonal pools and other sensitive areas.
• Install of erosion control measures
around seasonal pools.
• Implement actions to avoid
migratory birds and active nests.
• Conduct environmental awareness
training for onsite personnel.
• Conduct preconstruction surveys
for kit fox and kit fox dens.
• Employ a qualified biological
monitor to be on site during all initial
ground-disturbing construction
activities, to revisit the construction site
at least weekly and assure that all
avoidance and minimization measures
are in good working order, and to
prepare monitoring reports.
• The biological monitor will have
the authority to stop work, if deemed
necessary.
The applicant proposes to compensate
for covered-species effects that cannot
be avoided by purchasing preservation
credits at the Service-approved
conservation banks discussed in the
HCP.
Alternatives
Our proposed action is approving the
applicant’s HCP and issuing an
incidental take permit for the
applicant’s covered activities. As
required by the Act, the applicant’s HCP
considers alternatives to the take
expected under the proposed action.
The HCP considers the environmental
consequences of one alternative to the
proposed action, the No-Action
Alternative. Under the No-Action
Alternative, we would not issue a
permit; the applicant would not
improve the State Route 99/Cartmill
Avenue Interchange and would not
correct nonstandard features of the
existing Cartmill Avenue overcrossing;
project effects on covered-species
habitat would not occur; and the
applicant would not implement
proposed mitigation measures. While
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74505
this No-Action Alternative would avoid
take of covered-species, it is considered
infeasible because the applicant could
not complete necessary traffic safety
improvements or correct existing
circulation, access, and capacity
problems at the existing interchange.
Under the Proposed-Action
Alternative, we would issue an
incidental take permit for the
applicant’s proposed project, which
includes the covered activities
described above. The Proposed-Action
Alternative would permanently affect
approximately 36.44 acres and
temporarily affect approximately 12.24
acres of low-quality San Joaquin kit fox
foraging and breeding habitat, and
would permanently affect 0.071 acre of
low-quality vernal pool fairy shrimp
aquatic habitat. To mitigate for these
effects, the applicant proposes to
purchase preservation credits equal to
58.73 acres of high-quality kit fox
habitat and purchase preservation
credits equal to 0.213 acre of highquality vernal pool habitat at two
Service-approved conservation banks.
National Environmental Policy Act
As described in our EAS, we have
made the preliminary determination
that approval of the proposed HCP and
issuance of the permit would qualify as
a categorical exclusion under NEPA (42
U.S.C. 4321–4347 et seq.), as provided
by NEPA implementing regulations in
the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR
1500.5(k), 1507.3(b)(2), 1508.4), by
Department of Interior regulations (43
CFR 46.205, 46.210, 46.215), and by the
Department of the Interior Manual (516
DM 3 and 516 DM 8). Our EAS found
that the proposed HCP qualifies as a
‘‘low-effect’’ habitat conservation plan,
as defined by our ‘‘Habitat Conservation
Planning and Incidental Take Permitting
Process Handbook’’ (November 1996).
Determination of whether a habitat
conservation plan qualifies as low-effect
is based on the following three criteria:
(1) Implementation of the proposed HCP
would result in minor or negligible
effects on federally listed, proposed, or
candidate species and their habitats; (2)
implementation of the proposed HCP
would result in minor or negligible
effects on other environmental values or
resources; and (3) impacts of the HCP,
considered together with the impacts of
other past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable projects, would not result,
over time, in cumulative effects to
environmental values or resources that
would be considered significant. Based
upon the preliminary determinations in
the EAS, we do not intend to prepare
further NEPA documentation. We will
consider public comments when making
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
74506
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 241 / Friday, December 14, 2012 / Notices
the final determination on whether to
prepare an additional NEPA document
on the proposed action.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Public Comments
[FWS–HQ–IA–2012–N298;
FXIA16710900000P5–123–FF09A30000]
We request data, comments, new
information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community,
Tribes, industry, or any other interested
party on this notice. We particularly
seek comments on the following:
1. Biological information concerning
the species;
2. Relevant data concerning the
species;
3. Additional information concerning
the range, distribution, population size,
and population trends of the species;
4. Current or planned activities in the
subject area and their possible impacts
on the species;
5. The presence of archeological sites,
buildings and structures, historic
events, sacred and traditional areas, and
other historic preservation concerns,
which are required to be considered in
project planning by the National
Historic Preservation Act; and
6. Identification of any other
environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed
development and permit action.
Authority
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Endangered Species; Receipt of
Applications for Permit
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications
for permit.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, invite the public to
comment on the following applications
to conduct certain activities with
endangered species. With some
exceptions, the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) prohibits activities with listed
species unless Federal authorization is
acquired that allows such activities.
DATES: We must receive comments or
requests for documents on or before
January 14, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Brenda Tapia, Division of
Management Authority, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax
Drive, Room 212, Arlington, VA 22203;
fax (703) 358–2280; or email
DMAFR@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda Tapia, (703) 358–2104
(telephone); (703) 358–2280 (fax);
DMAFR@fws.gov (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
We provide this notice pursuant to
section 10(c) of the Act and the NEPA
public-involvement regulations (40 CFR
1500.1(b), 1500.2(d), and 1506.6). We
will evaluate the permit application,
including the HCP, and comments we
receive to determine whether the
application meets the requirements of
section 10(a) of the Act. If the
requirements are met, we will issue a
permit to the applicant for the
incidental take of the San Joaquin kit
fox and the vernal pool fairy shrimp
from the implementation of the covered
activities described in the Low-Effect
Habitat Conservation Plan for the
Proposed State Route 99/Cartmill
Avenue Interchange Improvements
Project, City of Tulare, Tulare County,
California. We will make the final
permit decision no sooner than January
14, 2013.
Dated: December 10, 2012.
Alexandra Pitts,
Field Supervisor, Sacramento Fish and
Wildlife Office, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2012–30186 Filed 12–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Fish and Wildlife Service
16:41 Dec 13, 2012
Jkt 229001
A. How do I request copies of
applications or comment on submitted
applications?
Send your request for copies of
applications or comments and materials
concerning any of the applications to
the contact listed under ADDRESSES.
Please include the Federal Register
notice publication date, the PRTnumber, and the name of the applicant
in your request or submission. We will
not consider requests or comments sent
to an email or address not listed under
ADDRESSES. If you provide an email
address in your request for copies of
applications, we will attempt to respond
to your request electronically.
Please make your requests or
comments as specific as possible. Please
confine your comments to issues for
which we seek comments in this notice,
and explain the basis for your
comments. Include sufficient
information with your comments to
allow us to authenticate any scientific or
commercial data you include.
The comments and recommendations
that will be most useful and likely to
influence agency decisions are: (1)
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Those supported by quantitative
information or studies; and (2) Those
that include citations to, and analyses
of, the applicable laws and regulations.
We will not consider or include in our
administrative record comments we
receive after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) or comments
delivered to an address other than those
listed above (see ADDRESSES).
B. May I review comments submitted by
others?
Comments, including names and
street addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review at the street
address listed under ADDRESSES. The
public may review documents and other
information applicants have sent in
support of the application unless our
allowing viewing would violate the
Privacy Act or Freedom of Information
Act. Before including your address,
phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
II. Background
To help us carry out our conservation
responsibilities for affected species, and
in consideration of section 10(a)(1)(A) of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), along
with Executive Order 13576,
‘‘Delivering an Efficient, Effective, and
Accountable Government,’’ and the
President’s Memorandum for the Heads
of Executive Departments and Agencies
of January 21, 2009—Transparency and
Open Government (74 FR 4685; January
26, 2009), which call on all Federal
agencies to promote openness and
transparency in Government by
disclosing information to the public, we
invite public comment on these permit
applications before final action is taken.
III. Permit Applications
A. Endangered Species
Applicant: Palm Beach Zoo at Dreher
Park, West Palm Beach, FL; PRT–
706378
The applicant requests renewal of
their captive-bred wildlife registration
under 50 CFR 17.21(g) for the following
families, genera, and species, to enhance
their propagation or survival. This
notification covers activities to be
conducted by the applicant over a 5year period.
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 241 (Friday, December 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74504-74506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30186]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2012-N204; FF08E00000-FXES11120800000F2-123-F2]
Proposed Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the State-Route
99/Cartmill Avenue Interchange Improvements Project, City of Tulare,
Tulare County, CA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have
received an application from the City of Tulare, Tulare County,
California (applicant), for a 5-year incidental take permit for two
species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The
application addresses the potential for ``take'' of two listed animals,
the vernal pool fairy shrimp and the San Joaquin kit fox. The applicant
would implement a conservation strategy program to avoid, minimize, and
mitigate effects of the project's covered activities, as described in
the applicant's low-effect habitat conservation plan (HCP). We request
comments on the applicant's application and plan, and our preliminary
determination that the plan qualifies as a ``low-effect'' habitat
conservation plan, eligible for a categorical exclusion under the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA). We
discuss our basis for this determination in our environmental action
statement (EAS), also available for public review.
DATES: We must receive written comments on or before January 14, 2013.
ADDRESSES: To request further information or submit written comments,
please use one of the following methods, and note that your information
request or comment is in reference to the Low-Effect Habitat
Conservation Plan for the State Route 99/Cartmill Avenue Interchange
Improvements Project, City of Tulare, Tulare County, California:
U.S. Mail: Nina Bicknese, Conservation Planning Division,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office,
2800 Cottage Way, W-2605, Sacramento, CA 95825.
In-Person Drop-off, Viewing, or Pickup: Call (916) 414-
6600 to make an appointment during regular business hours to drop off
comments or view received comments at the address shown above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Thomas, Chief, Conservation
Planning Division, or Eric Tattersall, Deputy Assistant Field
Supervisor, at the address shown above or at (916) 414-6600
(telephone). If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf,
please call the Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Documents
You may obtain copies of the permit application, HCP, and EAS from
the individuals in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Copies of these
documents are also available for public inspection, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife
Office (see ADDRESSES).
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, or other personal
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--might
be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Background Information
Section 9 of the Act prohibits taking of fish and wildlife species
listed as endangered or threatened under section 4 of the Act. Under
the Act, the term ``take'' means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any
such conduct. The term ``harm'' is defined in the regulations as
significant habitat modification or degradation that results in death
or injury of listed species by significantly impairing essential
behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR
17.3). The term ``harass'' is defined in the regulations as to carry
out actions that create the likelihood of injury to listed species to
such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns,
which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
(50 CFR 17.3).
However, under specified circumstances, the Service may issue
permits that allow the take of federally listed species, provided that
the take that occurs is incidental to, but not the purpose of, an
otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing permits for endangered
and threatened species are at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32, respectively.
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act contains provisions for issuing such
incidental take permits to non-Federal entities for the take of
endangered and threatened species, provided the following criteria are
met:
1. The taking will be incidental;
2. The applicants will, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impact of such taking;
3. The applicants will develop a proposed HCP and ensure that
adequate funding for the HCP will be provided;
4. The taking will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the
survival and recovery of the species in the wild; and
5. The applicants will carry out any other measures that the
Service may require as being necessary or appropriate for the purposes
of the HCP.
The applicant seeks an incidental take permit for proposed covered
activities within a 219-acre permit area surrounding the intersection
of State Route 99 and Cartmill Avenue within the City of Tulare, Tulare
County, California. The HCP does not include any unlisted animal
species or unlisted plant species. The following two federally listed
species will be included as covered species in the applicant's proposed
HCP:
San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) (endangered)
Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) (threatened)
For these covered species, the applicants would seek incidental
take authorization. All species included in the incidental take permit
would receive assurances under our ``No Surprises'' regulations (50 CFR
17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5)).
Activities proposed for coverage under the proposed incidental take
permit (covered-activities) would be otherwise lawful activities that
could occur consistent with the HCP, to include, but not be limited to:
Widen and improve sections of existing roadway.
Remove the existing Cartmill Avenue overpass, remove
associated roadways and associated highway ramps, and dispose of those
materials.
Store equipment and supplies in a designated staging area.
Construct a new Cartmill Avenue overpass, including a
temporary structure (falsework). Construct new roadways and new highway
ramps associated with the new overpass.
[[Page 74505]]
Excavate seven new stormwater detention basins and dispose
of excavated soil.
Remove existing vegetation, including plant roots.
Grade and re-contour ground, compact soil, and install
road surfaces (paving).
Install erosion control structures (such as silt fencing
and barriers).
Operate heavy equipment (including, but not limited to,
pneumatic tools, scrapers, bulldozers, backhoes, heavy trucks, cement
trucks, compactors, and water trucks.
Control dust by watering soil surfaces.
Excavate trenches to install traffic signals, lighting
conduit, streetlights, and similar facilities.
Sow native-plant species or other groundcover to prevent
erosion and to restore areas disturbed by construction activities.
Maintain and operate the completed project, including
maintenance watering of any landscaping vegetation, future mowing of
roadside vegetation, and future maintenance repairs to the constructed
facilities.
The applicant's proposed project would improve the State Route 99/
Cartmill Avenue Interchange (Interchange) and correct nonstandard
features of the existing Cartmill Avenue overcrossing. The new Cartmill
Avenue overpass would provide 16.5 feet of vertical clearance over
State Route 99, compared to the existing 15 feet, and provide space to
accommodate any future widening of State Route 99. The approximately
2,700-foot long overpass-section of Cartmill Avenue would be widened
from two lanes (approximately 38-feet wide) to become a six-lane
divided arterial (approximately 128-feet wide). The new Cartmill Avenue
overpass would transition from six lanes to the existing two lanes in a
400-foot section west of M Street, and in a 1,300-foot section east of
the new Akers Street intersection/Tulare Irrigation District Canal
crossing. The existing M Street intersection with Cartmill Avenue would
be improved, and a portion of M Street would be reconstructed. An
existing highway ramp in the southwest quadrant of the Interchange
would be removed, realigned, and replaced with a new ramp. Three
additional highway ramps would be constructed in the other Interchange
quadrants. The existing frontage road (Road 100) in the northeast
quadrant of the Interchange would be removed, and a new roadway (Akers
Street) would be constructed in an area approximately 330 feet to the
east of the existing road. Additional 12-inch-deep water detention
basins would be excavated in each quadrant of the Interchange. The
entire project would be constructed in a single phase.
The applicant proposes to avoid, minimize, and mitigate the effects
to the covered species associated with the covered activities by fully
implementing the conservation strategy described in the HCP. Avoidance
and minimization measures will include compliance with our January 2011
document ``U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Standard Recommendations for
Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During
Ground Disturbance.'' Other avoidance and minimization measures include
but are not limited to:
Install barrier fencing around the entire work area.
Install barrier fences around seasonal pools and other
sensitive areas.
Install of erosion control measures around seasonal pools.
Implement actions to avoid migratory birds and active
nests.
Conduct environmental awareness training for onsite
personnel.
Conduct preconstruction surveys for kit fox and kit fox
dens.
Employ a qualified biological monitor to be on site during
all initial ground-disturbing construction activities, to revisit the
construction site at least weekly and assure that all avoidance and
minimization measures are in good working order, and to prepare
monitoring reports.
The biological monitor will have the authority to stop
work, if deemed necessary.
The applicant proposes to compensate for covered-species effects
that cannot be avoided by purchasing preservation credits at the
Service-approved conservation banks discussed in the HCP.
Alternatives
Our proposed action is approving the applicant's HCP and issuing an
incidental take permit for the applicant's covered activities. As
required by the Act, the applicant's HCP considers alternatives to the
take expected under the proposed action. The HCP considers the
environmental consequences of one alternative to the proposed action,
the No-Action Alternative. Under the No-Action Alternative, we would
not issue a permit; the applicant would not improve the State Route 99/
Cartmill Avenue Interchange and would not correct nonstandard features
of the existing Cartmill Avenue overcrossing; project effects on
covered-species habitat would not occur; and the applicant would not
implement proposed mitigation measures. While this No-Action
Alternative would avoid take of covered-species, it is considered
infeasible because the applicant could not complete necessary traffic
safety improvements or correct existing circulation, access, and
capacity problems at the existing interchange.
Under the Proposed-Action Alternative, we would issue an incidental
take permit for the applicant's proposed project, which includes the
covered activities described above. The Proposed-Action Alternative
would permanently affect approximately 36.44 acres and temporarily
affect approximately 12.24 acres of low-quality San Joaquin kit fox
foraging and breeding habitat, and would permanently affect 0.071 acre
of low-quality vernal pool fairy shrimp aquatic habitat. To mitigate
for these effects, the applicant proposes to purchase preservation
credits equal to 58.73 acres of high-quality kit fox habitat and
purchase preservation credits equal to 0.213 acre of high-quality
vernal pool habitat at two Service-approved conservation banks.
National Environmental Policy Act
As described in our EAS, we have made the preliminary determination
that approval of the proposed HCP and issuance of the permit would
qualify as a categorical exclusion under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347 et
seq.), as provided by NEPA implementing regulations in the Code of
Federal Regulations (40 CFR 1500.5(k), 1507.3(b)(2), 1508.4), by
Department of Interior regulations (43 CFR 46.205, 46.210, 46.215), and
by the Department of the Interior Manual (516 DM 3 and 516 DM 8). Our
EAS found that the proposed HCP qualifies as a ``low-effect'' habitat
conservation plan, as defined by our ``Habitat Conservation Planning
and Incidental Take Permitting Process Handbook'' (November 1996).
Determination of whether a habitat conservation plan qualifies as low-
effect is based on the following three criteria: (1) Implementation of
the proposed HCP would result in minor or negligible effects on
federally listed, proposed, or candidate species and their habitats;
(2) implementation of the proposed HCP would result in minor or
negligible effects on other environmental values or resources; and (3)
impacts of the HCP, considered together with the impacts of other past,
present, and reasonably foreseeable projects, would not result, over
time, in cumulative effects to environmental values or resources that
would be considered significant. Based upon the preliminary
determinations in the EAS, we do not intend to prepare further NEPA
documentation. We will consider public comments when making
[[Page 74506]]
the final determination on whether to prepare an additional NEPA
document on the proposed action.
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific
community, Tribes, industry, or any other interested party on this
notice. We particularly seek comments on the following:
1. Biological information concerning the species;
2. Relevant data concerning the species;
3. Additional information concerning the range, distribution,
population size, and population trends of the species;
4. Current or planned activities in the subject area and their
possible impacts on the species;
5. The presence of archeological sites, buildings and structures,
historic events, sacred and traditional areas, and other historic
preservation concerns, which are required to be considered in project
planning by the National Historic Preservation Act; and
6. Identification of any other environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed development and permit action.
Authority
We provide this notice pursuant to section 10(c) of the Act and the
NEPA public-involvement regulations (40 CFR 1500.1(b), 1500.2(d), and
1506.6). We will evaluate the permit application, including the HCP,
and comments we receive to determine whether the application meets the
requirements of section 10(a) of the Act. If the requirements are met,
we will issue a permit to the applicant for the incidental take of the
San Joaquin kit fox and the vernal pool fairy shrimp from the
implementation of the covered activities described in the Low-Effect
Habitat Conservation Plan for the Proposed State Route 99/Cartmill
Avenue Interchange Improvements Project, City of Tulare, Tulare County,
California. We will make the final permit decision no sooner than
January 14, 2013.
Dated: December 10, 2012.
Alexandra Pitts,
Field Supervisor, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2012-30186 Filed 12-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
