Fidelity Bond and Insurance Coverage, 74112-74113 [2012-30075]
Download as PDF
74112
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 240 / Thursday, December 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
create stratified credit risk positions
whose performance is dependent upon
an underlying pool of credit exposures,
including loans and commitments.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 741—REQUIREMENTS FOR
INSURANCE
13. The authority citation for part 741
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757, 1766(a), 1781–
1790, and 1790d; 31 U.S.C. 3717.
14. In § 741.3, revise paragraph (a)(2)
by adding a sentence between the first
and second sentences to read as follows:
■
§ 741.3
Criteria.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) * * * For purposes of this
paragraph, if a state-chartered credit
union conducts and documents an
analysis that reasonably concludes an
investment is at least investment grade,
as defined in § 703.2 of this chapter, and
the investment is otherwise permissible
for Federal credit unions, that
investment is not considered to be
beyond those authorized by the Act or
the NCUA Rules and Regulations. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–30076 Filed 12–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 713
RIN 3133–AD98
Fidelity Bond and Insurance Coverage
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The NCUA Board (Board) is
adopting as a final rule, without change,
the interim final rule that the Board
issued in May 2012 that amended
NCUA’s fidelity bond rule. The interim
final rule removed references in the
fidelity bond rule to NCUA’s former
Regulatory Flexibility Program
(RegFlex), which granted a RegFlex
credit union broader authority to choose
the deductible amount of its fidelity
bond policy.
DATES: Effective December 13, 2012, the
interim final rule published May 31,
2012, at 77 FR 31981, is adopted as final
without change.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Kressman, Associate General
Counsel, Office of General Counsel, at
the above address or telephone: (703)
518–6540.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Dec 12, 2012
Jkt 229001
The
NCUA Board (Board) is adopting as a
final rule, without change, the interim
final rule that the Board issued in May
2012 that amended NCUA’s fidelity
bond rule.1 The interim final rule
removed references in the fidelity bond
rule to NCUA’s former Regulatory
Flexibility Program (RegFlex), which
granted a RegFlex credit union broader
authority to choose the deductible
amount of its fidelity bond policy.2
Specifically, the interim final rule
amended the standard used for granting
authority to a federal credit union (FCU)
to choose an increased deductible
amount. Before the Board issued the
interim final rule, the standard was
based on an FCU’s assets and status as
a RegFlex FCU. The standard used after
the interim final rule is based on an
FCU’s assets, CAMEL ratings, and
capital level. The new standard is also
used by NCUA in other rules affected by
the elimination of RegFlex.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Comments
III. Regulatory Procedures
I. Background
What did the interim final rule change
and why is NCUA adopting this final
rule?
In issuing a proposed rule in 2011 to
remove part 742 from NCUA’s
regulations and eliminate the RegFlex
Program,3 NCUA inadvertently
overlooked references to RegFlex in its
fidelity bond rule.4 At that time, the
fidelity bond rule established a formula
for calculating the maximum deductible
an FCU could carry on its fidelity bond
based partly on the FCU’s asset size.
The rule set a cap of $200,000, but
permitted RegFlex FCUs with assets in
excess of $1 million a higher maximum
deductible of up to $1 million.5 With
the issuance of the final rule to
eliminate RegFlex, the NCUA Board also
issued an interim final rule to amend
the fidelity bond rule.6
The interim final rule changed the
regulatory standard for permitting an
FCU to have an increased deductible on
its fidelity bond. As noted, the standard
used before the interim final rule was
that a RegFlex FCU with assets in excess
of $1 million had such authority. The
1 77
FR 31981 (May 31, 2012).
Board established RegFlex in 2002. 66 FR
58656 (Nov. 23, 2001). RegFlex relieved FCUs from
certain regulatory restrictions and granted them
additional powers if they demonstrated sustained
superior performance as measured by CAMEL
rating and net worth classification.
3 76 FR 81421 (Dec. 28, 2011).
4 12 CFR 713.6.
5 12 CFR 713.6(a)(1), (c).
6 77 FR 31981 (May 31, 2012).
2 The
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
standard used after the interim final rule
is that such authority is granted to an
FCU with assets in excess of $1 million
that is, among other things, well
capitalized.7
Specifically, the interim final rule
permits an FCU to choose a maximum
deductible amount for its fidelity bond
coverage of $1 million if the FCU has:
(1) Received a composite CAMEL rating
of ‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’ during its last two full
examinations and (2) maintained a
‘‘well capitalized’’ net worth
classification for the immediately
preceding six quarters or has remained
‘‘well capitalized’’ for the immediately
preceding six quarters after applying the
applicable risk-based net worth
requirement.
Once a year, an FCU meeting the
interim final rule’s well capitalized
standard must review its continued
eligibility for a higher deductible under
the rule, which is the same approach
applied by the Board when it adopted
the fidelity bond provisions in 2005.8
An FCU’s continued eligibility will be
based on its asset size as reflected in its
most recent year-end 5300 call report
and its net worth as reflected in that
same report. If an FCU that previously
qualified for the higher deductible limit
has a decrease in assets based on its
most recent year-end 5300 call report or
its net worth has decreased so that it
would no longer qualify under the well
capitalized standard in the fidelity bond
rule, then it must obtain the coverage
otherwise required by Part 713 with an
appropriate deductible. A similar result
occurs if an FCU meets the assets
threshold and its net worth continues to
qualify it under the well capitalized
standard, but it has failed to receive a
CAMEL rating of ‘‘1’’ or ‘‘2’’ during its
most recent examination report.
II. Comments
NCUA received no written responses
to its request for comment on the
interim final rule.9 Accordingly, the
NCUA Board adopts as final, without
change, the interim final rule published
in May 2012.10
III. Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NCUA must prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact a rule may have on a substantial
number of small entities (primarily
those under ten million dollars in
assets). The final rule reframes a
7 See 70 FR 61713 (Oct. 26, 2005) for a broader
perspective of the regulatory history of part 713.
8 Id. at 61714.
9 77 FR 31981 (May 31, 2012).
10 Id.
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 240 / Thursday, December 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on December 6, 2012.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
standard for FCUs in complying with
the fidelity bond deductible
requirements. NCUA has determined
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small credit unions.
For the reasons discussed above, the
National Credit Union Administration
adopts as final, without change, the
interim final rule published at 77 FR
31981 (May 31, 2012).
■
Paperwork Reduction Act
NCUA has determined that this rule
will not increase paperwork
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 and regulations
of the Office of Management and
Budget.
[FR Doc. 2012–30075 Filed 12–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Executive Order 13132
Department of the Navy
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. NCUA, an
independent regulatory agency as
defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily
complies with the executive order to
adhere to fundamental federalism
principles. This rule would not have a
substantial direct effect on the states, on
the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this rule does not
constitute a policy that has federalism
implications for purposes of the
executive order.
32 CFR Part 706
The Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999—Assessment
of Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
NCUA has determined that this final
rule will not affect family well-being
within the meaning of section 654 of the
Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law
105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
When NCUA issues a final rule, as
defined in Section 551 of the
Administrative Procedure Act, it triggers
a reporting requirement for
congressional review of agency rules
under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
Public Law 104–121 (SBREFA). The
Office of Management and Budget has
determined that this rule is not a major
rule for purposes of SBREFA.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 713
Credit unions, Insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Dec 12, 2012
Jkt 229001
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the Navy
(DoN) is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (DAJAG) (Admiralty and
Maritime Law) has determined that USS
CORONADO (LCS 4) is a vessel of the
Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with certain provisions of the 72
COLREGS without interfering with its
special function as a naval ship. The
intended effect of this rule is to warn
mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS
apply.
DATES: This rule is effective December
13, 2012 and is applicable beginning
December 4, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Jocelyn Loftus-Williams,
JAGC, U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney,
(Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
the Judge Advocate General, Department
of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave., SE.,
Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374–5066, telephone number: 202–
685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR Part 706.
This amendment provides notice that
the DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime
Law), under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
USS CORONADO (LCS 4) is a vessel of
the Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with the following specific
provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
74113
naval ship: Annex I paragraph 2(a)(i),
pertaining to the location of the forward
masthead light at a height not less than
12 meters above the hull; Annex I,
paragraph 3(a), pertaining to the
location of the forward masthead light
in the forward quarter of the ship, and
the horizontal distance between the
forward and after masthead lights;
Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(i), pertaining to
the placement of the masthead light or
lights above and clear of all other lights
and obstructions; Annex I, paragraph
3(c), pertaining to the task light’s
horizontal distance from the fore and aft
centerline of the vessel in the
athwartship direction; and Rule 21(a),
pertaining to the arc of visibility of the
aft masthead light. The DAJAG
(Admiralty and Maritime Law) has also
certified that the lights involved are
located in closest possible compliance
with the applicable 72 COLREGS
requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR Parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and
Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the DoN amends part 706 of
title 32 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
2. Section 706.2 is amended as
follows:
■ A. In Table One by adding, in alpha
numerical order by vessel number, an
entry for USS CORONADO (LCS 4);
■ B. In Table Four, Paragraph 15 by
adding, in alpha numerical order by
vessel number, an entry for USS
CORONADO (LCS 4);
■ C. In Table Four, Paragraph 16 by
adding, in alpha numerical order by
vessel number, an entry for USS
CORONADO (LCS 4); and
■ D. In Table Five by adding, in alpha
numerical order by vessel number, an
■
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 240 (Thursday, December 13, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74112-74113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30075]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 713
RIN 3133-AD98
Fidelity Bond and Insurance Coverage
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NCUA Board (Board) is adopting as a final rule, without
change, the interim final rule that the Board issued in May 2012 that
amended NCUA's fidelity bond rule. The interim final rule removed
references in the fidelity bond rule to NCUA's former Regulatory
Flexibility Program (RegFlex), which granted a RegFlex credit union
broader authority to choose the deductible amount of its fidelity bond
policy.
DATES: Effective December 13, 2012, the interim final rule published
May 31, 2012, at 77 FR 31981, is adopted as final without change.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Kressman, Associate General
Counsel, Office of General Counsel, at the above address or telephone:
(703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NCUA Board (Board) is adopting as a
final rule, without change, the interim final rule that the Board
issued in May 2012 that amended NCUA's fidelity bond rule.\1\ The
interim final rule removed references in the fidelity bond rule to
NCUA's former Regulatory Flexibility Program (RegFlex), which granted a
RegFlex credit union broader authority to choose the deductible amount
of its fidelity bond policy.\2\ Specifically, the interim final rule
amended the standard used for granting authority to a federal credit
union (FCU) to choose an increased deductible amount. Before the Board
issued the interim final rule, the standard was based on an FCU's
assets and status as a RegFlex FCU. The standard used after the interim
final rule is based on an FCU's assets, CAMEL ratings, and capital
level. The new standard is also used by NCUA in other rules affected by
the elimination of RegFlex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 77 FR 31981 (May 31, 2012).
\2\ The Board established RegFlex in 2002. 66 FR 58656 (Nov. 23,
2001). RegFlex relieved FCUs from certain regulatory restrictions
and granted them additional powers if they demonstrated sustained
superior performance as measured by CAMEL rating and net worth
classification.
I. Background
II. Comments
III. Regulatory Procedures
I. Background
What did the interim final rule change and why is NCUA adopting this
final rule?
In issuing a proposed rule in 2011 to remove part 742 from NCUA's
regulations and eliminate the RegFlex Program,\3\ NCUA inadvertently
overlooked references to RegFlex in its fidelity bond rule.\4\ At that
time, the fidelity bond rule established a formula for calculating the
maximum deductible an FCU could carry on its fidelity bond based partly
on the FCU's asset size. The rule set a cap of $200,000, but permitted
RegFlex FCUs with assets in excess of $1 million a higher maximum
deductible of up to $1 million.\5\ With the issuance of the final rule
to eliminate RegFlex, the NCUA Board also issued an interim final rule
to amend the fidelity bond rule.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 76 FR 81421 (Dec. 28, 2011).
\4\ 12 CFR 713.6.
\5\ 12 CFR 713.6(a)(1), (c).
\6\ 77 FR 31981 (May 31, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The interim final rule changed the regulatory standard for
permitting an FCU to have an increased deductible on its fidelity bond.
As noted, the standard used before the interim final rule was that a
RegFlex FCU with assets in excess of $1 million had such authority. The
standard used after the interim final rule is that such authority is
granted to an FCU with assets in excess of $1 million that is, among
other things, well capitalized.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 70 FR 61713 (Oct. 26, 2005) for a broader perspective of
the regulatory history of part 713.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the interim final rule permits an FCU to choose a
maximum deductible amount for its fidelity bond coverage of $1 million
if the FCU has: (1) Received a composite CAMEL rating of ``1'' or ``2''
during its last two full examinations and (2) maintained a ``well
capitalized'' net worth classification for the immediately preceding
six quarters or has remained ``well capitalized'' for the immediately
preceding six quarters after applying the applicable risk-based net
worth requirement.
Once a year, an FCU meeting the interim final rule's well
capitalized standard must review its continued eligibility for a higher
deductible under the rule, which is the same approach applied by the
Board when it adopted the fidelity bond provisions in 2005.\8\ An FCU's
continued eligibility will be based on its asset size as reflected in
its most recent year-end 5300 call report and its net worth as
reflected in that same report. If an FCU that previously qualified for
the higher deductible limit has a decrease in assets based on its most
recent year-end 5300 call report or its net worth has decreased so that
it would no longer qualify under the well capitalized standard in the
fidelity bond rule, then it must obtain the coverage otherwise required
by Part 713 with an appropriate deductible. A similar result occurs if
an FCU meets the assets threshold and its net worth continues to
qualify it under the well capitalized standard, but it has failed to
receive a CAMEL rating of ``1'' or ``2'' during its most recent
examination report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Id. at 61714.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Comments
NCUA received no written responses to its request for comment on
the interim final rule.\9\ Accordingly, the NCUA Board adopts as final,
without change, the interim final rule published in May 2012.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 77 FR 31981 (May 31, 2012).
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NCUA must prepare an analysis to describe any significant economic
impact a rule may have on a substantial number of small entities
(primarily those under ten million dollars in assets). The final rule
reframes a
[[Page 74113]]
standard for FCUs in complying with the fidelity bond deductible
requirements. NCUA has determined this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small credit unions.
Paperwork Reduction Act
NCUA has determined that this rule will not increase paperwork
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and regulations
of the Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests.
NCUA, an independent regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive order to adhere to fundamental
federalism principles. This rule would not have a substantial direct
effect on the states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this rule does not constitute a policy that has
federalism implications for purposes of the executive order.
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this final rule will not affect family
well-being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law 105-277, 112
Stat. 2681 (1998).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
When NCUA issues a final rule, as defined in Section 551 of the
Administrative Procedure Act, it triggers a reporting requirement for
congressional review of agency rules under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121
(SBREFA). The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this
rule is not a major rule for purposes of SBREFA.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 713
Credit unions, Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board on December 6,
2012.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
0
For the reasons discussed above, the National Credit Union
Administration adopts as final, without change, the interim final rule
published at 77 FR 31981 (May 31, 2012).
[FR Doc. 2012-30075 Filed 12-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P