Susan F. Knott; Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order, 73663-73665 [2012-29782]
Download as PDF
73663
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 11, 2012 / Notices
procedures that CDRH and CBER intend
to follow when industry representatives
or application sponsors request a
meeting with review staff.
In the Federal Register of July 13,
2012 (77 FR 41413), FDA published a
notice of availability combined with a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. FDA received no PRArelated comments.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
FDA Center
Annual
frequency
per response
Total annual
responses
Hours per
response
Total
hours
CDRH ...................................................................................
CBER ...................................................................................
2,465
79
1
1
2,465
79
137
137
337,705
10,823
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
348,528
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Respondents are medical device
manufacturers subject to FDA’s laws
and regulations. FDA estimates that it
will receive approximately 2,544 presubmission packages annually. The
Agency reached this estimate by
reviewing the number of submissions
received by the Agency under the PreIDE program over the past 10 years.
Based on FDA’s experience with the
Pre-IDE program, FDA expects the Pre-
Submission program to continue to be
utilized as a viable program in the
future and expects that the number of
pre-submission packages will increase
over its current rate and reach a steady
state of approximately 2,544
submissions per year.
FDA estimates from past experience
with the Pre-IDE program that the
complete process involved with the
program takes approximately 137 hours.
This average is based upon estimates by
FDA administrative and technical staff
that is familiar with the requirements
for submission of a Pre-Submission and
related materials, have consulted and
advised manufacturers on these
requirements, and have reviewed the
documentation submitted.
Therefore, the total reporting burden
hours is estimated to be 348,528 hours.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
Hourly wage rate
Total cost annualized
2,544
1 There
Total burden hours annualized
137
$150
$52,279,200
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The average to industry per hour for
this type of work is $150, resulting in
a cost of $20,550 per respondent. The
estimated submission cost of $20,550
multiplied by 2,544 submissions per
year equals $52,279,200, which is the
aggregated industry reporting cost
annualized.
FDA’s annual estimate of 2,544
submissions is based on experienced
trends over the past several years. FDA’s
administrative and technical staffs, who
are familiar with the requirements for
current pre-submissions, estimate that
an average of 137 hours is required to
prepare a pre-submission. However, we
recognize there is a variance in the
preparation submission because of the
vast and varying complexities of
medical devices.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Dated: December 3, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–29788 Filed 12–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:01 Dec 10, 2012
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0304]
Susan F. Knott; Denial of Hearing;
Final Debarment Order
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is denying a
request for a hearing submitted by
Susan F. Knott and is issuing an order
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) debarring
Knott for 2 years from providing
services in any capacity to a person that
has an approved or pending drug
product application. FDA bases this
order on a finding that Knott was
convicted of a misdemeanor under
Federal law for conduct relating to the
regulation of a drug product under the
FD&C Act and that the type of conduct
underlying the conviction undermines
the process for the regulation of drugs.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In determining the appropriateness and
period of Knott’s debarment, FDA has
considered the relevant factors listed in
the FD&C Act. Knott has failed to file
with the Agency information and
analyses sufficient to create a basis for
a hearing concerning this action.
DATES: The order is effective December
11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit applications for
termination of debarment to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: G.
Matthew Warren, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–
796–4613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(2)(B)(i)(I))
permits FDA to debar an individual if it
finds that the individual has been
convicted of a misdemeanor under
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
73664
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 11, 2012 / Notices
Federal law for conduct relating to the
regulation of drug products under the
FD&C Act, and if FDA finds that the
type of conduct that served as the basis
for the conviction undermines the
process for the regulation of drugs.
On August 11, 2009, in the U.S.
district court for the northern district of
New York, Knott pled guilty to a
misdemeanor under the FD&C Act,
namely misbranding a drug in violation
of sections 301(k), 502(i)(3) and
303(a)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
331(k), 352(i)(3), 333(a)(1)) and 18
U.S.C. 2. The basis for this conviction
was conduct surrounding her role in the
injection of patients seeking treatment
with BOTOX/BOTOX Cosmetic
(BOTOX) with a product, TRI-toxin,
distributed by Toxic Research
International, Inc. (TRI). BOTOX is a
biological product derived from
botulinum toxin type A that is
manufactured by Allergan, Inc., and was
approved by FDA for use on humans for
the treatment of facial wrinkles in 1991.
According to the records of the
criminal proceedings, Knott, in
following a physician’s instructions,
ordered at least 31 vials of TRI-toxin, an
unapproved drug product, which was
represented by its distributor as
‘‘Botulinum Toxin Type A.’’ Knott, a
supervisory nurse in the medical
practice, then instructed other nurses on
how to dilute the TRI-toxin for injection
into patients in accordance with orders
from one or more physicians.
Knott is subject to debarment based
on a finding, under section
306(b)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act: (1) That
she was convicted of a misdemeanor
under Federal law for conduct relating
to the regulation of a drug product
under the FD&C Act and (2) that the
type of conduct underlying the
conviction undermines the process for
the regulation of drugs. By letter dated
November 30, 2010, FDA notified Knott
of its proposal to debar her for 2 years
from providing services in any capacity
to a person having an approved or
pending drug product application. In a
letter dated February 3, 2011, through
counsel, Knott requested a hearing on
the proposal. In her request for a
hearing, Knott acknowledges her
conviction under Federal law, as alleged
by FDA. However, she argues that she
should not be debarred for several
reasons, including several related to the
factual basis set forth in the proposal to
debar.
We reviewed Knott’s request for a
hearing and find that Knott has not
created a sufficient basis for a hearing.
Hearings are granted only if there is a
genuine and substantial issue of fact.
Hearings will not be granted on issues
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:01 Dec 10, 2012
Jkt 229001
of policy or law, on mere allegations,
denials, or general descriptions of
positions and contentions, or on data
and information insufficient to justify
the factual determination urged (see 21
CFR 12.24(b)).
The Chief Scientist has considered
Knott’s arguments and concludes that
they are unpersuasive and fail to raise
a genuine and substantial issue of fact
requiring a hearing.
II. Arguments
In support of her hearing request,
Knott first asserts that section
306(b)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act does not
apply to her because she was never
involved in the approval or regulation of
drug products, nor was the underlying
conduct of her conviction related to
those activities. During her criminal
proceedings, however, Knott pled guilty
to misbranding and causing the
misbranding of a drug in violation of
sections 301(k), 502(i)(3) and 303(a)(1)
of the FD&C Act by causing TRI-toxin,
a drug not approved for use, to be
offered for sale as an approved drug
product, BOTOX. This conduct clearly
relates to the regulation of drugs under
the FD&C Act because it was in direct
violation of the FD&C Act. The conduct
also undermined the process for the
regulation of drugs in that it permitted
an unapproved drug to be substituted
for an approved drug without the
knowledge of the patient. As a result,
Knott is subject to debarment under
section 306(b)(2)(B)(i).
Knott next contends that she pled
guilty to a misdemeanor violation under
section 303(a)(1) of the FD&C Act,
which is a strict liability offense, and
that thus there was no demonstration or
admission of criminal intent or
knowledge underlying her conviction.
She argues that, because she was not
aware her conduct violated the FD&C
Act, the conduct underlying her
conviction could not undermine the
process for regulation of drugs and she
should not be debarred.
With respect to Knott’s assertion that
her offense was strict liability, section
306(b)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act
specifically provides for the debarment
of individuals convicted of Federal
misdemeanors related to the regulation
of drug products under the FD&C Act.
Given that misdemeanor violations of
the FD&C Act itself are strict liability
offenses, it stands to reason that
criminal intent is not a critical
component to debar an individual under
section 306(b)(2)(B)(i). The charge to
which Knott pled guilty did not hinge
on supervisory liability or a technical
violation of the FD&C Act. The charge
in the information to which she pled
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
guilty alleged that she caused a drug to
be misbranded by offering it for sale
under the name of another drug,
BOTOX. The criminal information
further establishes that, over the course
of 9 months, she took the affirmative
steps of ordering the drug and assisting
in the formulation of the drug for
injection to at least 150 patients. That
the charge did not require a showing of
intent has little to no bearing on
whether Knott should be debarred. An
individual need not have criminal
intent for his or her conduct to
undermine the process for the
regulation of drugs. Knott’s conduct
undermined the process for the
regulation of drugs in that it permitted
an unapproved drug to be substituted
for an approved drug without the
knowledge of the patient. Knott has not
presented any genuine and substantial
issues of fact with respect to whether
the conduct underlying her conviction
undermines the process for the
regulation of drugs.
Finally, Knott argues that the
considerations under section 306(c)(3)
of the FD&C Act weigh against imposing
debarment of any length or debarment
beyond a minimal period and that FDA
should exercise discretion and decline
to debar her for that reason. As set forth
in the proposal and summarized in this
document, Knott pled guilty to a
misdemeanor under the FD&C Act for
her role in offering a drug under the
name of another. Consistent with the
proposal to debar, therefore, we find
that the consideration in section
306(c)(3)(A) of the FD&C Act with
respect to the nature and seriousness of
the offense involved weighs in favor of
debarring Knott for some period of time.
The record establishes that the
medical practice of which Knott was a
part ultimately took voluntary steps to
mitigate the effect on the public health
from its unlawful conduct (see section
306(c)(3)(C) of the FD&C Act). Moreover,
the record reflects that she was merely
following a physician’s orders and that
thus she did not serve a managerial role
in the offense (see section 306(c)(3)(B) of
the FD&C Act). Finally, it is undisputed
that she had no previous criminal
convictions related to matters within the
jurisdiction of FDA (see section
306(c)(3)(F) of the FD&C Act). These
considerations counterbalance the
nature and seriousness of her offense
sufficiently to warrant decreasing the
period of debarment from 5 years to 2
years, as recommended in the proposal
to debar.
III. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Chief Scientist, under
section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD&C
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 11, 2012 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Act and under authority delegated to
him by the Commissioner of Food and
Drugs, finds: (1) That Knott has been
convicted of a misdemeanor under
Federal law for conduct relating to the
development or approval of a drug
product or otherwise relating to the
regulation of a drug product under the
FD&C Act and (2) that the conduct
underlying the conviction undermines
the process for the regulation of drugs.
FDA has considered the relevant factors
listed in section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C
Act and determined that a debarment of
2 years is appropriate.
As a result of the foregoing findings,
Knott is debarred for 2 years from
providing services in any capacity to a
person with an approved or pending
drug product application under section
505, 512, or 802 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under
section 351 of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective (see DATES)
(see 21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(1)(B),
(c)(2)(A)(iii), and 321(dd)). Any person
with an approved or pending drug
product application, who knowingly
uses the services of Knott, in any
capacity during her period of
debarment, will be subject to civil
money penalties (section 307(a)(6) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If
Knott, during her period of debarment,
provides services in any capacity to a
person with an approved or pending
drug product application, she will be
subject to civil money penalties (section
307(a)(7) of the FD&C Act). In addition,
FDA will not accept or review any
abbreviated new drug applications
submitted by or with the assistance of
Knott during her period of debarment
(section 306(c)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act).
Any application by Knott for
termination of debarment under section
306(d) of the FD&C Act should be
identified with Docket No. FDA–2010–
N–0304 and sent to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES).
All such submissions are to be filed in
four copies. The public availability of
information in these submissions is
governed by 21 CFR 10.20(j).
Publicly available submissions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. Persons with
access to the Internet may obtain
documents in the Docket at https://
www.regulations.gov/.
Dated: November 29, 2012.
Jesse L. Goodman,
Chief Scientist.
[FR Doc. 2012–29782 Filed 12–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:01 Dec 10, 2012
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Statement of Organization, Functions
and Delegations of Authority
This notice amends Part R of the
Statement of Organization, Functions
and Delegations of Authority of the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA) (60 FR
56605, as amended November 6, 1995;
as last amended at 77 FR 65694–65698
dated October 30, 2012).
This notice reflects organizational
changes to the Health Resources and
Services Administration. This notice
updates the functional statement for the
Bureau of Clinician Recruitment and
Service (BCRS) (RU). Specifically, this
notice: (1) Updates the functional
statement for the Division of Program
Operations (RU9).
Chapter RU—Bureau of Clinician
Recruitment and Service
Section RU–20, Functions
Delete the functional statement for the
Division of Program Operations (RU9)
and replace in its entirety.
Division of Program Operations (RU9)
Serves as the organizational focal
point for the Bureau’s centralized,
comprehensive customer service
function to support program
participants and oversee participants’
compliance with all BCRS programs.
Provides regular and ongoing
communication, technical assistance,
and support to program participants
through the period of obligated service
and closeout. Specifically: (1) Initiates
contact with and monitors program
participants throughout their service; (2)
manages participants’ site transfers, inservice verifications, and similar service
change requests; (3) reviews program
cases and recommends participants for
suspensions, waivers, and defaults to
the appropriate BCRS Division; (4)
conducts closeout activities and issues
completion certificates to participants
that fulfill their service obligation; (5)
manages the 6-month verification
process; and, (6) maintains program
participants’ case files in the Bureau’s
management information system.
Section R–30, Delegations of Authority
All delegations of authority and redelegations of authority made to HRSA
officials that were in effect immediately
prior to this reorganization, and that are
consistent with this reorganization,
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73665
shall continue in effect pending further
re-delegation.
This reorganization is effective upon
date of signature.
December 4, 2012.
Mary K. Wakefield,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012–29862 Filed 12–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Under the provisions of
Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Clinical
Center, the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) a
request for review and approval of the
information collection listed below.
This proposed information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register on July 13, 2012, page 41431
and allowed 60-days for public
comment. No public comments were
received. The purpose of this notice is
to allow an additional 30 days for public
comment. The National Institutes of
Health may not conduct or sponsor, and
the respondent is not required to
respond to, an information collection
that has been extended, revised, or
implemented on or after October 1,
1995, unless it displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Proposed Collection: Title: The Impact
of Clinical Research Training and
Medical Education at the Clinical Center
on Physician Careers in Academia and
Clinical Research. Type of Information
Collection Request: Reinstatement with
Change; OMB Control Number: 0925–
0602; Need and Use of Information
Collection: This study will assess the
value of the training programs
administered by the Office of Clinical
Research Training and Medical
Education. The primary objective of the
survey is to determine if training
programs have had an impact on
whether the trainees are performing
clinical research, hold an academic
appointment, have National Institutes of
Health funding sources as well as to
obtain information from the trainees as
to what part of the National Institutes of
Health medical education program they
feel could be improved upon, the
quality of the mentoring program, and
how their National Institutes of Health
training has contributed to their current
clinical competence. Frequency of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73663-73665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29782]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0304]
Susan F. Knott; Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is denying a request
for a hearing submitted by Susan F. Knott and is issuing an order under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) debarring Knott
for 2 years from providing services in any capacity to a person that
has an approved or pending drug product application. FDA bases this
order on a finding that Knott was convicted of a misdemeanor under
Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of a drug product
under the FD&C Act and that the type of conduct underlying the
conviction undermines the process for the regulation of drugs. In
determining the appropriateness and period of Knott's debarment, FDA
has considered the relevant factors listed in the FD&C Act. Knott has
failed to file with the Agency information and analyses sufficient to
create a basis for a hearing concerning this action.
DATES: The order is effective December 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit applications for termination of debarment to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: G. Matthew Warren, Office of
Scientific Integrity, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-4613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
335a(b)(2)(B)(i)(I)) permits FDA to debar an individual if it finds
that the individual has been convicted of a misdemeanor under
[[Page 73664]]
Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of drug products
under the FD&C Act, and if FDA finds that the type of conduct that
served as the basis for the conviction undermines the process for the
regulation of drugs.
On August 11, 2009, in the U.S. district court for the northern
district of New York, Knott pled guilty to a misdemeanor under the FD&C
Act, namely misbranding a drug in violation of sections 301(k),
502(i)(3) and 303(a)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 331(k), 352(i)(3),
333(a)(1)) and 18 U.S.C. 2. The basis for this conviction was conduct
surrounding her role in the injection of patients seeking treatment
with BOTOX/BOTOX Cosmetic (BOTOX) with a product, TRI-toxin,
distributed by Toxic Research International, Inc. (TRI). BOTOX is a
biological product derived from botulinum toxin type A that is
manufactured by Allergan, Inc., and was approved by FDA for use on
humans for the treatment of facial wrinkles in 1991.
According to the records of the criminal proceedings, Knott, in
following a physician's instructions, ordered at least 31 vials of TRI-
toxin, an unapproved drug product, which was represented by its
distributor as ``Botulinum Toxin Type A.'' Knott, a supervisory nurse
in the medical practice, then instructed other nurses on how to dilute
the TRI-toxin for injection into patients in accordance with orders
from one or more physicians.
Knott is subject to debarment based on a finding, under section
306(b)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act: (1) That she was convicted of a
misdemeanor under Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of
a drug product under the FD&C Act and (2) that the type of conduct
underlying the conviction undermines the process for the regulation of
drugs. By letter dated November 30, 2010, FDA notified Knott of its
proposal to debar her for 2 years from providing services in any
capacity to a person having an approved or pending drug product
application. In a letter dated February 3, 2011, through counsel, Knott
requested a hearing on the proposal. In her request for a hearing,
Knott acknowledges her conviction under Federal law, as alleged by FDA.
However, she argues that she should not be debarred for several
reasons, including several related to the factual basis set forth in
the proposal to debar.
We reviewed Knott's request for a hearing and find that Knott has
not created a sufficient basis for a hearing. Hearings are granted only
if there is a genuine and substantial issue of fact. Hearings will not
be granted on issues of policy or law, on mere allegations, denials, or
general descriptions of positions and contentions, or on data and
information insufficient to justify the factual determination urged
(see 21 CFR 12.24(b)).
The Chief Scientist has considered Knott's arguments and concludes
that they are unpersuasive and fail to raise a genuine and substantial
issue of fact requiring a hearing.
II. Arguments
In support of her hearing request, Knott first asserts that section
306(b)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act does not apply to her because she was
never involved in the approval or regulation of drug products, nor was
the underlying conduct of her conviction related to those activities.
During her criminal proceedings, however, Knott pled guilty to
misbranding and causing the misbranding of a drug in violation of
sections 301(k), 502(i)(3) and 303(a)(1) of the FD&C Act by causing
TRI-toxin, a drug not approved for use, to be offered for sale as an
approved drug product, BOTOX. This conduct clearly relates to the
regulation of drugs under the FD&C Act because it was in direct
violation of the FD&C Act. The conduct also undermined the process for
the regulation of drugs in that it permitted an unapproved drug to be
substituted for an approved drug without the knowledge of the patient.
As a result, Knott is subject to debarment under section
306(b)(2)(B)(i).
Knott next contends that she pled guilty to a misdemeanor violation
under section 303(a)(1) of the FD&C Act, which is a strict liability
offense, and that thus there was no demonstration or admission of
criminal intent or knowledge underlying her conviction. She argues
that, because she was not aware her conduct violated the FD&C Act, the
conduct underlying her conviction could not undermine the process for
regulation of drugs and she should not be debarred.
With respect to Knott's assertion that her offense was strict
liability, section 306(b)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act specifically
provides for the debarment of individuals convicted of Federal
misdemeanors related to the regulation of drug products under the FD&C
Act. Given that misdemeanor violations of the FD&C Act itself are
strict liability offenses, it stands to reason that criminal intent is
not a critical component to debar an individual under section
306(b)(2)(B)(i). The charge to which Knott pled guilty did not hinge on
supervisory liability or a technical violation of the FD&C Act. The
charge in the information to which she pled guilty alleged that she
caused a drug to be misbranded by offering it for sale under the name
of another drug, BOTOX. The criminal information further establishes
that, over the course of 9 months, she took the affirmative steps of
ordering the drug and assisting in the formulation of the drug for
injection to at least 150 patients. That the charge did not require a
showing of intent has little to no bearing on whether Knott should be
debarred. An individual need not have criminal intent for his or her
conduct to undermine the process for the regulation of drugs. Knott's
conduct undermined the process for the regulation of drugs in that it
permitted an unapproved drug to be substituted for an approved drug
without the knowledge of the patient. Knott has not presented any
genuine and substantial issues of fact with respect to whether the
conduct underlying her conviction undermines the process for the
regulation of drugs.
Finally, Knott argues that the considerations under section
306(c)(3) of the FD&C Act weigh against imposing debarment of any
length or debarment beyond a minimal period and that FDA should
exercise discretion and decline to debar her for that reason. As set
forth in the proposal and summarized in this document, Knott pled
guilty to a misdemeanor under the FD&C Act for her role in offering a
drug under the name of another. Consistent with the proposal to debar,
therefore, we find that the consideration in section 306(c)(3)(A) of
the FD&C Act with respect to the nature and seriousness of the offense
involved weighs in favor of debarring Knott for some period of time.
The record establishes that the medical practice of which Knott was
a part ultimately took voluntary steps to mitigate the effect on the
public health from its unlawful conduct (see section 306(c)(3)(C) of
the FD&C Act). Moreover, the record reflects that she was merely
following a physician's orders and that thus she did not serve a
managerial role in the offense (see section 306(c)(3)(B) of the FD&C
Act). Finally, it is undisputed that she had no previous criminal
convictions related to matters within the jurisdiction of FDA (see
section 306(c)(3)(F) of the FD&C Act). These considerations
counterbalance the nature and seriousness of her offense sufficiently
to warrant decreasing the period of debarment from 5 years to 2 years,
as recommended in the proposal to debar.
III. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Chief Scientist, under section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of
the FD&C
[[Page 73665]]
Act and under authority delegated to him by the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs, finds: (1) That Knott has been convicted of a misdemeanor
under Federal law for conduct relating to the development or approval
of a drug product or otherwise relating to the regulation of a drug
product under the FD&C Act and (2) that the conduct underlying the
conviction undermines the process for the regulation of drugs. FDA has
considered the relevant factors listed in section 306(c)(3) of the FD&C
Act and determined that a debarment of 2 years is appropriate.
As a result of the foregoing findings, Knott is debarred for 2
years from providing services in any capacity to a person with an
approved or pending drug product application under section 505, 512, or
802 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under section 351
of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective (see DATES)
(see 21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(1)(B), (c)(2)(A)(iii), and 321(dd)). Any person
with an approved or pending drug product application, who knowingly
uses the services of Knott, in any capacity during her period of
debarment, will be subject to civil money penalties (section 307(a)(6)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If Knott, during her period of
debarment, provides services in any capacity to a person with an
approved or pending drug product application, she will be subject to
civil money penalties (section 307(a)(7) of the FD&C Act). In addition,
FDA will not accept or review any abbreviated new drug applications
submitted by or with the assistance of Knott during her period of
debarment (section 306(c)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act).
Any application by Knott for termination of debarment under section
306(d) of the FD&C Act should be identified with Docket No. FDA-2010-N-
0304 and sent to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES).
All such submissions are to be filed in four copies. The public
availability of information in these submissions is governed by 21 CFR
10.20(j).
Publicly available submissions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain documents in the Docket
at https://www.regulations.gov/.
Dated: November 29, 2012.
Jesse L. Goodman,
Chief Scientist.
[FR Doc. 2012-29782 Filed 12-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P