Sex Offender Registration Amendments, 73558-73560 [2012-29636]
Download as PDF
73558
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
proposed AD would also require
ground-run functional checks within
every 1,000 operating hours.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 1,420 engines
installed in helicopters of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 30 minutes per engine to perform
a check of the engine’s tachometer unit
cycle counting feature and that an
average of 320 checks would be required
per year. Based on the average annual
operating hours for an engine, a 1,000
operating hour functional check would
not be required for at least one year. The
average labor rate is $85 per hour. No
parts would be required. Based on these
figures, we estimate the average total
cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to perform checks of the
tachometer cycle counting unit for a
year, is $19,312,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Dec 10, 2012
Jkt 229001
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Turbomeca S.A.: Docket No. FAA–2012–
1131; Directorate Identifier 2012–NE–
34–AD.
counting feature. If the counting feature fails
the check, thereafter use only the primary
cycle counting method to count cycles.
(4) If the tachometer is replaced, follow
instructions in paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2), and
(e)(3) of this AD.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make
your request.
(g) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Sanjana Murthy, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7750; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: sanjana.murthy@faa.gov.
(2) Refer to European Aviation Safety
Agency AD 2012–0187, dated September 18,
2012, and Turbomeca S.A. Service Bulletin
(SB) No. 292 80 0168 and SB No. 292 80
0190, for related information.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220
Tarnos, France; phone: 33 (0) 5 59 74 40 00;
telex: 570 042; fax: 33 (0) 5 59 74 45 15. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by February
11, 2013.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
None.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
December 3, 2012.
Colleen M. D’Alessandro,
Assistant Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–29871 Filed 12–10–12; 8:45 am]
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Turbomeca S.A. Arriel
1A1, 1A2, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1C2, 1D, 1D1, 1E2,
1K1, 1S, and 1S1 turboshaft engines that
have incorporated Modification TU 207 or
TU 243, or have incorporated Turbomeca
Service Bulletin (SB) No. 292 80 0168 or SB
No. 292 80 0190.
(d) Reason
This AD was prompted by detailed
analysis and review of the accuracy of the
engine’s tachometer cycle counting feature.
We are issuing this AD to prevent
uncontained engine failure and damage to
the helicopter.
(e) Actions and Compliance
(1) During the post flight maintenance
inspection after the last flight of each day,
compare the cycles counted by the engine’s
tachometer unit with the cycles counted by
the primary counting method.
(2) If the numbers are different, use the
primary counting method thereafter to
determine all cycle counts. Do not use the
values from the tachometer unit cycle
counting feature.
(3) If the engine tachometer cycle counting
feature remains accurate, then every 1,000
operating hours, perform a ground-run
functional check of the tachometer unit cycle
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER
SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
28 CFR Part 811
RIN 3225–AA10
Sex Offender Registration
Amendments
Court Services and Offender
Supervision Agency for the District of
Columbia.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Court Services and
Offender Supervision Agency for the
District of Columbia (‘‘CSOSA’’) is
issuing a proposed rule to amend its
current rule that sets forth procedures
and requirements relating to periodic
verification of registration information
for sex offenders. The proposed rule, if
finalized, would permit CSOSA to
verify addresses of sex offenders by
conducting home visits on its own
accord and with its law enforcement
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
partners. The proposed rule, if adopted,
would also clarify the schedule for
verifying home addresses, even for those
sex offenders who are required to
register but are not under CSOSA’s
supervision.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
February 11, 2013. All comments,
including attachments and other
supporting materials, will be part of the
public record and will be subject to
public disclosure. Sensitive personal
information such as social security
numbers should not be included with
your comments.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Office
of the General Counsel, CSOSA, 633
Indiana Avenue, NW., Room 1380,
Washington, DC 20004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rorey Smith, Deputy General Counsel,
(202) 220–5797, or
rorey.smith@csosa.gov. Questions about
this publication are welcome, but
inquiries concerning individual cases
cannot be answered over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
CSOSA is responsible under the
District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999, DC Law 13–
137, DC Official Code Sections 22–4001
et seq., for carrying out the sex offender
registration functions in the District of
Columbia, including verification of
information maintained on sex
offenders. In addition, the Sex Offender
Registration and Notification Act
(SORNA), Title I of the Adam Walsh
Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006,
(Pub. L. 109–248), provides a
comprehensive set of minimum
standards for sex offender registration
and notification in the United States.
SORNA is designed to strengthen and
increase the effectiveness of sex
offender registration and notification for
the protection of the public and to
reduce the risk that sex offenders could
evade registration requirements or the
consequences of registration violations.
This amendment will allow CSOSA to
better meet the requirements of the
District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999 and SORNA.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
II. Statutory Authority
The District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999
The District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999, DC Law 13–
137, DC Official Code Sections 22–4001
et seq., grants CSOSA the authority to
adopt and implement procedures and
requirements for verification of address
information and other information
required for registration.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Dec 10, 2012
Jkt 229001
The Sex Offender Registration and
Notification Act (SORNA)
The Sex Offender Registration and
Notification Act (SORNA), Title I of the
Adam Walsh Child Protection and
Safety Act of 2006, (Pub. L. 109–248),
requires a sex offender to appear in
person, allowing the jurisdiction to take
a current photograph and verify the
information in the sex offender registry
on a scheduled frequency. Jurisdictions
may require verification of registration
information with greater frequency than
that required by SORNA and may wish
to include in their systems additional
means of verification for registration
information, such as mailing address
verification forms to the registered
residence address, requesting that the
sex offender to sign and return a
verification form, crosschecking
information provided by the sex
offender for inclusion in the registry
against other records systems, and
verifying home addresses through home
visits.
Jurisdictions are required to notify
appropriate law enforcement agencies of
failures by sex offenders to comply with
registration requirements, and such
registration violations must be reflected
in the sex offender registry. SORNA
requires that jurisdictions and the
appropriate law enforcement agencies
take any appropriate action to ensure
compliance. Federal law enforcement
resources, including those of the United
States Marshals Service, are permitted
to assist jurisdictions in locating and
apprehending sex offenders who violate
registration requirements.
III. Request for Comments
CSOSA invites comments to address
its proposed rule amending its existing
rule, permitting CSOSA to: (1) Verify
addresses of sex offenders by
conducting home visits on its own
accord and with its law enforcement
partners, and (2) clarify the schedule for
verifying home addresses, even for those
sex offenders who are required to
register but are not under CSOSA’s
supervision.
73559
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive
Order 13132, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications
requiring a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The rules will not cause State, local,
or tribal governments, or the private
sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in
any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. No action under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle E–
Congressional Review Act)
These rules are not ‘‘major rules’’ as
defined by Section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E–
Congressional Review Act), now
codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The rules
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies.
Moreover, these are rules of agency
practice or procedure that do not
substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties, and
do not come within the meaning of the
term ‘‘rule’’ as used in Section
804(3)(C), now codified at 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C). Therefore, the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not
apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 811
Probation and parole.
IV. Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Executive Order 12866
CSOSA has determined that this
proposed rule is not a significant rule
within the meaning of Executive Order
12866.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Court Services and
Offender Supervision Agency for the
District of Columbia proposes to amend
28 CFR Part 811 as follows:
PART 811 [AMENDED]
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR
part 811 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: DC ST § 24–133 and the
District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999, DC Law 13–137.
2. In § 811.9, revise paragraph (c) and
add paragraph (e) to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
73560
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
§ 811.9 Periodic verification of registration
information.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Quarterly or annually, as
appropriate, CSOSA will send a
certified letter with return receipt
requested to the home of the sex
offender.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) CSOSA, either on its own accord
or with its law enforcement partners,
will conduct home verifications of
registered sex offenders pursuant to the
following schedule:
(1) Semi-annually, at least every six
months, for all registered Class A sex
offenders without supervision
obligation.
(2) Annually, for all registered Class B
sex offenders without a supervision
obligation.
(3) As directed by CSOSA and
consistent with Agency policy for all
Class A and B sex offenders with
supervision obligation.
Dated: December 3, 2012
Nancy M. Ware,
Director, CSOSA.
[FR Doc. 2012–29636 Filed 12–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3129–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0386; FRL- 9761–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Redesignation of the West
Virginia Portion of the ParkersburgMarietta, WV–OH 1997 Annual Fine
Particulate Matter (PM2.5)
Nonattainment Area to Attainment and
Approval of the Associated
Maintenance Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a redesignation request and State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of West Virginia.
The West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection (WVDEP) is
requesting that the West Virginia
portion of the Parkersburg-Marietta,
WV–OH fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
nonattainment area (ParkersburgMarietta Area or Area) be redesignated
as attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5
national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS). The Parkersburg-Marietta
Area is comprised of Wood County and
a portion of Pleasants County in West
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Dec 10, 2012
Jkt 229001
Virginia (West Virginia portion of the
Area); and Washington County in Ohio.
In this rulemaking action, EPA is
proposing to approve the PM2.5
redesignation request for the West
Virginia portion of the ParkersburgMarietta Area. EPA is also proposing to
approve the maintenance plan SIP
revision that the State submitted in
conjunction with its redesignation
request. The maintenance plan provides
for continued attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS for 10 years after
redesignation of the West Virginia
portion of the Area. The maintenance
plan includes an insignificance
determination for the on-road motor
vehicle contribution of PM2.5, nitrogen
oxides (NOX), and sulfur dioxide (SO2)
for the West Virginia portion of the Area
for purposes of transportation
conformity. EPA is proposing to find
that West Virginia’s insignificance
determination for transportation
conformity is adequate.1 EPA is also
proposing to find that the Area
continues to attain the standard. This
action to propose approval of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS redesignation
request, maintenance plan, and
insignificance determination for
transportation conformity for the West
Virginia portion of the Area is based on
EPA’s determination that the Area has
met the criteria for redesignation to
attainment specified in the Clean Air
Act (CAA). EPA is taking separate action
to propose redesignation of the Ohio
portion of the Parkersburg-Marietta
Area.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before January 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2012–0386 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: mastro.donna@epa.gov
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0386,
Donna Mastro, Acting Associate
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning,
Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
1 On November 5, 2012, EPA initiated the
comment period for this proposed insignificance
determination on the Office of Transportation and
Air Quality (OTAQ) web site https://www.epa.gov/
otaq/stateresources/transconf/currsips.htm) in
order to allow for a full 30 day public comment
period in conjunction with this proposed
rulemaking action.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2012–
0386. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the West Virginia
Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601
57th Street SE., Charleston, West
Virginia 25304.
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 11, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73558-73560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29636]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
28 CFR Part 811
RIN 3225-AA10
Sex Offender Registration Amendments
AGENCY: Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District
of Columbia.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the
District of Columbia (``CSOSA'') is issuing a proposed rule to amend
its current rule that sets forth procedures and requirements relating
to periodic verification of registration information for sex offenders.
The proposed rule, if finalized, would permit CSOSA to verify addresses
of sex offenders by conducting home visits on its own accord and with
its law enforcement
[[Page 73559]]
partners. The proposed rule, if adopted, would also clarify the
schedule for verifying home addresses, even for those sex offenders who
are required to register but are not under CSOSA's supervision.
DATES: Submit comments on or before February 11, 2013. All comments,
including attachments and other supporting materials, will be part of
the public record and will be subject to public disclosure. Sensitive
personal information such as social security numbers should not be
included with your comments.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Office of the General Counsel, CSOSA, 633
Indiana Avenue, NW., Room 1380, Washington, DC 20004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rorey Smith, Deputy General Counsel,
(202) 220-5797, or rorey.smith@csosa.gov. Questions about this
publication are welcome, but inquiries concerning individual cases
cannot be answered over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
CSOSA is responsible under the District of Columbia Sex Offender
Registration Act of 1999, DC Law 13-137, DC Official Code Sections 22-
4001 et seq., for carrying out the sex offender registration functions
in the District of Columbia, including verification of information
maintained on sex offenders. In addition, the Sex Offender Registration
and Notification Act (SORNA), Title I of the Adam Walsh Child
Protection and Safety Act of 2006, (Pub. L. 109-248), provides a
comprehensive set of minimum standards for sex offender registration
and notification in the United States. SORNA is designed to strengthen
and increase the effectiveness of sex offender registration and
notification for the protection of the public and to reduce the risk
that sex offenders could evade registration requirements or the
consequences of registration violations. This amendment will allow
CSOSA to better meet the requirements of the District of Columbia Sex
Offender Registration Act of 1999 and SORNA.
II. Statutory Authority
The District of Columbia Sex Offender Registration Act of 1999
The District of Columbia Sex Offender Registration Act of 1999, DC
Law 13-137, DC Official Code Sections 22-4001 et seq., grants CSOSA the
authority to adopt and implement procedures and requirements for
verification of address information and other information required for
registration.
The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA)
The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), Title I
of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, (Pub. L.
109-248), requires a sex offender to appear in person, allowing the
jurisdiction to take a current photograph and verify the information in
the sex offender registry on a scheduled frequency. Jurisdictions may
require verification of registration information with greater frequency
than that required by SORNA and may wish to include in their systems
additional means of verification for registration information, such as
mailing address verification forms to the registered residence address,
requesting that the sex offender to sign and return a verification
form, crosschecking information provided by the sex offender for
inclusion in the registry against other records systems, and verifying
home addresses through home visits.
Jurisdictions are required to notify appropriate law enforcement
agencies of failures by sex offenders to comply with registration
requirements, and such registration violations must be reflected in the
sex offender registry. SORNA requires that jurisdictions and the
appropriate law enforcement agencies take any appropriate action to
ensure compliance. Federal law enforcement resources, including those
of the United States Marshals Service, are permitted to assist
jurisdictions in locating and apprehending sex offenders who violate
registration requirements.
III. Request for Comments
CSOSA invites comments to address its proposed rule amending its
existing rule, permitting CSOSA to: (1) Verify addresses of sex
offenders by conducting home visits on its own accord and with its law
enforcement partners, and (2) clarify the schedule for verifying home
addresses, even for those sex offenders who are required to register
but are not under CSOSA's supervision.
IV. Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Executive Order 12866
CSOSA has determined that this proposed rule is not a significant
rule within the meaning of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive Order 13132, this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications requiring a Federalism
Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact upon
a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The rules will not cause State, local, or tribal governments, or
the private sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and
it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. No
action under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle E-
Congressional Review Act)
These rules are not ``major rules'' as defined by Section 804 of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle
E-Congressional Review Act), now codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The rules
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with
foreign-based companies. Moreover, these are rules of agency practice
or procedure that do not substantially affect the rights or obligations
of non-agency parties, and do not come within the meaning of the term
``rule'' as used in Section 804(3)(C), now codified at 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does
not apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 811
Probation and parole.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Court Services and
Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia proposes to
amend 28 CFR Part 811 as follows:
PART 811 [AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR part 811 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: DC ST Sec. 24-133 and the District of Columbia Sex
Offender Registration Act of 1999, DC Law 13-137.
2. In Sec. 811.9, revise paragraph (c) and add paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
[[Page 73560]]
Sec. 811.9 Periodic verification of registration information.
* * * * *
(c) Quarterly or annually, as appropriate, CSOSA will send a
certified letter with return receipt requested to the home of the sex
offender.
* * * * *
(e) CSOSA, either on its own accord or with its law enforcement
partners, will conduct home verifications of registered sex offenders
pursuant to the following schedule:
(1) Semi-annually, at least every six months, for all registered
Class A sex offenders without supervision obligation.
(2) Annually, for all registered Class B sex offenders without a
supervision obligation.
(3) As directed by CSOSA and consistent with Agency policy for all
Class A and B sex offenders with supervision obligation.
Dated: December 3, 2012
Nancy M. Ware,
Director, CSOSA.
[FR Doc. 2012-29636 Filed 12-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3129-01-P