Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual Specifications, 73005-73007 [2012-29621]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 236 / Friday, December 7, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Form 5130.9 if there is a jeopardy to the
revenue.
(c) Retention. The brewer shall retain
a copy of Form 5130.9 or Form 5130.26
as part of the brewery records.
Signed: September 18, 2012.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: September 28, 2012.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2012–29487 Filed 12–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0120; FRL–9710–2]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Imperial County,
Placer County, and Ventura County Air
Pollution Control Districts
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Imperial County Air
Pollution Control District (ICAPCD),
Placer County Air Pollution Control
District (PCAPCD) and Ventura County
Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD)
portions of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). Under
authority of the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), we
are proposing to approve local rules that
address emission statements for ICAPCD
and PCAPCD and definitions for
VCAPCD.
SUMMARY:
Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by January 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number [EPA–R09–
OAR–2012–0120], by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Dec 06, 2012
Jkt 229001
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the
docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Allen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
This
proposal addresses the following local
rules: ICAPCD Rule 116, PCAPCD Rule
503, and VCAPCD Rule 2. In the Rules
and Regulations section of this Federal
Register, we are approving these local
rules in a direct final action without
prior proposal because we believe these
SIP revisions are not controversial. If we
receive adverse comments, however, we
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule. Please note that
if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
73005
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: July 19, 2012.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012–29363 Filed 12–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 120924487–2487–01]
RIN 0648–XC263
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries;
Annual Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to implement
the annual catch limit (ACL), harvest
guideline (HG), annual catch target
(ACT) and associated annual reference
points for Pacific mackerel in the U.S.
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the
Pacific coast for the fishing season of
July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013.
This rule is proposed according to the
Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). The proposed
2012–2013 ACL or maximum HG for
Pacific mackerel is 40,514 metric tons
(mt). The proposed ACT, which will be
the directed fishing harvest target, is
30,386 mt. If the fishery attains the ACT,
the directed fishery will close, reserving
the difference between the ACL and
ACT (10,128 mt) as a set aside for
incidental landings in other CPS
fisheries and other sources of mortality.
This rule is intended to conserve and
manage the Pacific mackerel stock off
the U.S. West Coast.
DATES: Comments must be received by
January 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2012–0215 by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov. To submit
comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal,
first click the ‘‘submit a comment’’ icon,
then enter NOAA–NMFS–2012–0215 in
the keyword search. Locate the
document you wish to comment on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
73006
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 236 / Friday, December 7, 2012 / Proposed Rules
from the resulting list and click on the
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ icon on the right
of that line.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region,
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
• Fax: (562) 980–4047.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
Copies of the report ‘‘Pacific Mackerel
(Scomber japonicus) Stock Assessment
for USA Management in the 2011–12
Fishing Year’’ and the Environmental
Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review
for this action may be obtained from the
Southwest Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES).
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Lindsay, Southwest Region,
NMFS, (562) 980–4034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During
public meetings each year, the estimated
biomass for Pacific mackerel is
presented to the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s (Council) Coastal
Pelagic Species (CPS) Management
Team (Team), the Council’s CPS
Advisory Subpanel (Subpanel) and the
Council’s Scientific and Statistical
Committee (SSC), where the biomass
and the status of the fisheries are
reviewed and discussed. The biomass
estimate is then presented to the
Council along with the calculated
overfishing limit (OFL) and available
biological catch (ABC), annual catch
limit (ACL) and harvest guideline (HG)
and/or annual catch target (ACT)
recommendations and comments from
the Team, Subpanel and SSC. Following
review by the Council and after hearing
public comment, the Council adopts a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Dec 06, 2012
Jkt 229001
biomass estimate and makes its catch
level recommendations to NMFS.
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to implement the 2012–2013 ACL, HG,
ACT and other annual catch reference
points, including OFL and an ABC that
takes into consideration uncertainty
surrounding the current estimate of
biomass, for Pacific mackerel in the U.S.
EEZ off the Pacific coast. (The EEZ off
the Pacific Coast encompasses ocean
waters seaward of the outer boundary of
state waters, which is 3 nautical miles
off the coast, out to a line 200 nautical
miles from the coast.) The CPS FMP and
its implementing regulations require
NMFS to set these annual catch levels
for the Pacific mackerel fishery based on
the annual specification framework in
the FMP. This framework includes a
harvest control rule that determines the
maximum HG, the primary management
target for the fishery, for the current
fishing season. The HG is based, in large
part, on the current estimate of stock
biomass. The harvest control rule in the
CPS FMP is HG = [(Biomass¥Cutoff) *
Fraction * Distribution] with the
parameters described as follows:
1. Biomass. The estimated stock
biomass of Pacific mackerel for the
2012–2013 management season is
211,126 mt.
2. Cutoff. This is the biomass level
below which no commercial fishery is
allowed. The FMP established this level
at 18,200 mt.
3. Fraction. The harvest fraction is the
percentage of the biomass above 18,200
mt that may be harvested.
4. Distribution. The average portion
(currently 70%) of the total Pacific
mackerel biomass that is estimated to be
in the U.S. EEZ off the Pacific coast,
based on the average historical larval
distribution obtained from scientific
cruises and the distribution of the
resource according to the logbooks of
aerial fish-spotters.
At the June 2012 Council meeting, the
Council recommended management
measures for the Pacific mackerel
fishery. These management measures
were based on the 2011 full stock
assessment, which estimated the
biomass of Pacific mackerel to be
211,126 mt. The 2011 full stock
assessment of Pacific mackerel was
reviewed by a Stock Assessment Review
Panel in May 2011, and was approved
in June 2011 by the SSC as the best
available science for use in
management. Based on
recommendations from the Council’s
SSC and other advisory bodies, the
Council recommended and NOAA
Fisheries (NMFS) is proposing, an OFL
of 44,336 mt, an ABC of 42,375 mt, an
ACL and maximum harvest guideline
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(HG) of 40,514 mt, and an ACT of
30,386 mt for the 2012–2013 Pacific
mackerel fishing year. These catch
specifications are based on the biomass
estimate for Pacific mackerel and the
control rules established in the CPS
FMP.
If the ACT is attained, the directed
fishery will close, and the difference
between the ACL and ACT (10,128 mt)
will be reserved as a set aside for
incidental landings in other CPS
fisheries and other sources of mortality.
In that event, incidental harvest
measures will be in place for the
remainder of the fishing year, including
a 45 percent incidental catch allowance
when Pacific mackerel are landed with
other CPS. In other words, no more than
45 percent by weight of the CPS landed
per trip may be Pacific mackerel, except
that up to 1 mt of Pacific mackerel could
be landed without landing any other
CPS. Upon the fishery attaining the
ACL/HG (40,514 mt), no vessels in CPS
fisheries may retain Pacific mackerel.
The purpose of the incidental set-aside
and allowance of an incidental fishery
is to allow for the restricted incidental
landings of Pacific mackerel in other
fisheries, particularly other CPS
fisheries, when the directed fishery is
closed to reduce potential discard of
Pacific mackerel and allow for
continued prosecution of other
important CPS fisheries.
The NMFS Southwest Regional
Administrator will publish a notice in
the Federal Register announcing the
date of any closure to either directed or
incidental fishing. Additionally, to
ensure the regulated community is
informed of any closure NMFS will also
make announcements through other
means available, including fax, email,
and mail to fishermen, processors, and
state fishery management agencies.
Detailed information on the fishery
and the stock assessment are found in
the report ‘‘Pacific Mackerel (Scomber
japonicus) Stock Assessment for USA
Management in the 2011–12 Fishing
Year’’ (see ADDRESSES).
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the CPS FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
These proposed specifications are
exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866.
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 236 / Friday, December 7, 2012 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Chief
Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
for the reasons as follows:
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to implement the 2012–2013 annual
specifications for Pacific mackerel in the
U.S. EEZ off the Pacific coast. The CPS
FMP and its implementing regulations
require NMFS to set an OFL, ABC, ACL
and HG or ACT for the Pacific mackerel
fishery based on the harvest control
rules in the FMP. The specific harvest
control rule is applied to the current
stock biomass estimate to derive the
annual HG, which is used to manage the
commercial take of Pacific mackerel.
The U.S. Small Business
Administration defines small businesses
engaged in fishing as those vessels with
annual revenues of or below $4 million.
The small entities that would be
affected by the proposed action are the
vessels that compose the West Coast
CPS finfish fleet. Pacific mackerel
harvest is one component of CPS
fisheries off the U.S. West Coast, which
primarily includes the fisheries for
Pacific sardine, northern anchovy and
market squid. Pacific mackerel are
principally caught off southern
California within the limited entry
portion (south of 39 degrees N. latitude;
Point Arena, California) of the fishery.
Fifty-eight vessels are currently
permitted in the Federal CPS limited
entry fishery off California. The average
annual per vessel revenue in 2011 for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Dec 06, 2012
Jkt 229001
the West Coast CPS finfish fleet was
well below $4 million; therefore, all of
these vessels therefore are considered
small businesses under the RFA.
Because each affected vessel is a small
business, this proposed rule has an
equal effect on all of these small
entities, and therefore will impact a
substantial number of these small
entities in the same manner.
The profitability of these vessels as a
result of this proposed rule is based on
the average Pacific mackerel ex-vessel
price per mt. NMFS used average Pacific
mackerel ex-vessel price per mt to
conduct a profitability analysis because
cost data for the harvesting operations of
CPS finfish vessels was limited or
unavailable. For the 2011–2012 fishing
year the HG was 40,514 mt and was
divided into a directed fishery (or ACT)
of 30,386 mt and an incidental fishery
of 10,128 mt. Approximately 1,900 mt of
this HG was harvested in 2011–2012
fishing season with an estimated exvessel value of $456,000 mt. Using these
figures, the average 2011/2012 ex-vessel
price per mt of Pacific mackerel was
approximately $240.
The proposed ACL/HG for the 2012/
2013 Pacific mackerel fishing season is
40,514 mt, with a directed fishing
harvest target or ACT of 30,386 mt. This
season’s directed fishing target is the
same as the previous year. If the fleet
were to take the entire 2012–2013 ACT,
and assuming a coastwide average exvessel price per mt of $220 (average of
2010 and 2011 ex-vessel), the potential
revenue to the fleet would be
approximately $6.6 million. However,
this result will depend greatly on
market forces within the fishery, and on
the regional availability of the resource
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
73007
to the fleet and the fleets’ ability to find
schools of Pacific mackerel. The annual
average U.S. Pacific mackerel harvest
from 2001 to 2010 is approximately
4,500 mt, and over the last 10 years
landings have averaged approximately
6,000 mt without exceeding 10,000 mt.
As a result, it is unlikely that the ACT
proposed in this rule will limit the
potential profitability of the fleet from
Pacific mackerel. Accordingly, vessels’
profits are not expected to be altered as
a result of this rule as it relates to recent
catches in the fishery and the previous
season’s regulation.
Based on the disproportionality and
profitability analysis above, this rule, if
adopted, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of these small entities. As a
result, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis is not required, and none has
been prepared.
There are no reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements required by this proposed
rule. Additionally, no other Federal
rules duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this proposed rule.
This action does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
for purposes of the Paper Reduction Act.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 3, 2012.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
performing the functions and duties of the
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–29621 Filed 12–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 236 (Friday, December 7, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73005-73007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29621]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 120924487-2487-01]
RIN 0648-XC263
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species
Fisheries; Annual Specifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to implement the annual catch limit (ACL),
harvest guideline (HG), annual catch target (ACT) and associated annual
reference points for Pacific mackerel in the U.S. exclusive economic
zone (EEZ) off the Pacific coast for the fishing season of July 1,
2012, through June 30, 2013. This rule is proposed according to the
Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP). The
proposed 2012-2013 ACL or maximum HG for Pacific mackerel is 40,514
metric tons (mt). The proposed ACT, which will be the directed fishing
harvest target, is 30,386 mt. If the fishery attains the ACT, the
directed fishery will close, reserving the difference between the ACL
and ACT (10,128 mt) as a set aside for incidental landings in other CPS
fisheries and other sources of mortality. This rule is intended to
conserve and manage the Pacific mackerel stock off the U.S. West Coast.
DATES: Comments must be received by January 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document identified by NOAA-
NMFS-2012-0215 by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov.
To submit comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal, first click the
``submit a comment'' icon, then enter NOAA-NMFS-2012-0215 in the
keyword search. Locate the document you wish to comment on
[[Page 73006]]
from the resulting list and click on the ``Submit a Comment'' icon on
the right of that line.
Mail: Submit written comments to Rodney R. McInnis,
Regional Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd.,
Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
Fax: (562) 980-4047.
Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above
methods to ensure that the comments are received, documented, and
considered by NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered. All comments received are a part of the public
record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the
sender will be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you
wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be
accepted in Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
Copies of the report ``Pacific Mackerel (Scomber japonicus) Stock
Assessment for USA Management in the 2011-12 Fishing Year'' and the
Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review for this action may
be obtained from the Southwest Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Lindsay, Southwest Region,
NMFS, (562) 980-4034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During public meetings each year, the
estimated biomass for Pacific mackerel is presented to the Pacific
Fishery Management Council's (Council) Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS)
Management Team (Team), the Council's CPS Advisory Subpanel (Subpanel)
and the Council's Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC), where the
biomass and the status of the fisheries are reviewed and discussed. The
biomass estimate is then presented to the Council along with the
calculated overfishing limit (OFL) and available biological catch
(ABC), annual catch limit (ACL) and harvest guideline (HG) and/or
annual catch target (ACT) recommendations and comments from the Team,
Subpanel and SSC. Following review by the Council and after hearing
public comment, the Council adopts a biomass estimate and makes its
catch level recommendations to NMFS.
The purpose of this proposed rule is to implement the 2012-2013
ACL, HG, ACT and other annual catch reference points, including OFL and
an ABC that takes into consideration uncertainty surrounding the
current estimate of biomass, for Pacific mackerel in the U.S. EEZ off
the Pacific coast. (The EEZ off the Pacific Coast encompasses ocean
waters seaward of the outer boundary of state waters, which is 3
nautical miles off the coast, out to a line 200 nautical miles from the
coast.) The CPS FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS to
set these annual catch levels for the Pacific mackerel fishery based on
the annual specification framework in the FMP. This framework includes
a harvest control rule that determines the maximum HG, the primary
management target for the fishery, for the current fishing season. The
HG is based, in large part, on the current estimate of stock biomass.
The harvest control rule in the CPS FMP is HG = [(Biomass-Cutoff) *
Fraction * Distribution] with the parameters described as follows:
1. Biomass. The estimated stock biomass of Pacific mackerel for the
2012-2013 management season is 211,126 mt.
2. Cutoff. This is the biomass level below which no commercial
fishery is allowed. The FMP established this level at 18,200 mt.
3. Fraction. The harvest fraction is the percentage of the biomass
above 18,200 mt that may be harvested.
4. Distribution. The average portion (currently 70%) of the total
Pacific mackerel biomass that is estimated to be in the U.S. EEZ off
the Pacific coast, based on the average historical larval distribution
obtained from scientific cruises and the distribution of the resource
according to the logbooks of aerial fish-spotters.
At the June 2012 Council meeting, the Council recommended
management measures for the Pacific mackerel fishery. These management
measures were based on the 2011 full stock assessment, which estimated
the biomass of Pacific mackerel to be 211,126 mt. The 2011 full stock
assessment of Pacific mackerel was reviewed by a Stock Assessment
Review Panel in May 2011, and was approved in June 2011 by the SSC as
the best available science for use in management. Based on
recommendations from the Council's SSC and other advisory bodies, the
Council recommended and NOAA Fisheries (NMFS) is proposing, an OFL of
44,336 mt, an ABC of 42,375 mt, an ACL and maximum harvest guideline
(HG) of 40,514 mt, and an ACT of 30,386 mt for the 2012-2013 Pacific
mackerel fishing year. These catch specifications are based on the
biomass estimate for Pacific mackerel and the control rules established
in the CPS FMP.
If the ACT is attained, the directed fishery will close, and the
difference between the ACL and ACT (10,128 mt) will be reserved as a
set aside for incidental landings in other CPS fisheries and other
sources of mortality. In that event, incidental harvest measures will
be in place for the remainder of the fishing year, including a 45
percent incidental catch allowance when Pacific mackerel are landed
with other CPS. In other words, no more than 45 percent by weight of
the CPS landed per trip may be Pacific mackerel, except that up to 1 mt
of Pacific mackerel could be landed without landing any other CPS. Upon
the fishery attaining the ACL/HG (40,514 mt), no vessels in CPS
fisheries may retain Pacific mackerel. The purpose of the incidental
set-aside and allowance of an incidental fishery is to allow for the
restricted incidental landings of Pacific mackerel in other fisheries,
particularly other CPS fisheries, when the directed fishery is closed
to reduce potential discard of Pacific mackerel and allow for continued
prosecution of other important CPS fisheries.
The NMFS Southwest Regional Administrator will publish a notice in
the Federal Register announcing the date of any closure to either
directed or incidental fishing. Additionally, to ensure the regulated
community is informed of any closure NMFS will also make announcements
through other means available, including fax, email, and mail to
fishermen, processors, and state fishery management agencies.
Detailed information on the fishery and the stock assessment are
found in the report ``Pacific Mackerel (Scomber japonicus) Stock
Assessment for USA Management in the 2011-12 Fishing Year'' (see
ADDRESSES).
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has
determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the CPS FMP,
other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, and other applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
These proposed specifications are exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
[[Page 73007]]
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
the Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
for the reasons as follows:
The purpose of this proposed rule is to implement the 2012-2013
annual specifications for Pacific mackerel in the U.S. EEZ off the
Pacific coast. The CPS FMP and its implementing regulations require
NMFS to set an OFL, ABC, ACL and HG or ACT for the Pacific mackerel
fishery based on the harvest control rules in the FMP. The specific
harvest control rule is applied to the current stock biomass estimate
to derive the annual HG, which is used to manage the commercial take of
Pacific mackerel.
The U.S. Small Business Administration defines small businesses
engaged in fishing as those vessels with annual revenues of or below $4
million. The small entities that would be affected by the proposed
action are the vessels that compose the West Coast CPS finfish fleet.
Pacific mackerel harvest is one component of CPS fisheries off the U.S.
West Coast, which primarily includes the fisheries for Pacific sardine,
northern anchovy and market squid. Pacific mackerel are principally
caught off southern California within the limited entry portion (south
of 39 degrees N. latitude; Point Arena, California) of the fishery.
Fifty-eight vessels are currently permitted in the Federal CPS limited
entry fishery off California. The average annual per vessel revenue in
2011 for the West Coast CPS finfish fleet was well below $4 million;
therefore, all of these vessels therefore are considered small
businesses under the RFA. Because each affected vessel is a small
business, this proposed rule has an equal effect on all of these small
entities, and therefore will impact a substantial number of these small
entities in the same manner.
The profitability of these vessels as a result of this proposed
rule is based on the average Pacific mackerel ex-vessel price per mt.
NMFS used average Pacific mackerel ex-vessel price per mt to conduct a
profitability analysis because cost data for the harvesting operations
of CPS finfish vessels was limited or unavailable. For the 2011-2012
fishing year the HG was 40,514 mt and was divided into a directed
fishery (or ACT) of 30,386 mt and an incidental fishery of 10,128 mt.
Approximately 1,900 mt of this HG was harvested in 2011-2012 fishing
season with an estimated ex-vessel value of $456,000 mt. Using these
figures, the average 2011/2012 ex-vessel price per mt of Pacific
mackerel was approximately $240.
The proposed ACL/HG for the 2012/2013 Pacific mackerel fishing
season is 40,514 mt, with a directed fishing harvest target or ACT of
30,386 mt. This season's directed fishing target is the same as the
previous year. If the fleet were to take the entire 2012-2013 ACT, and
assuming a coastwide average ex-vessel price per mt of $220 (average of
2010 and 2011 ex-vessel), the potential revenue to the fleet would be
approximately $6.6 million. However, this result will depend greatly on
market forces within the fishery, and on the regional availability of
the resource to the fleet and the fleets' ability to find schools of
Pacific mackerel. The annual average U.S. Pacific mackerel harvest from
2001 to 2010 is approximately 4,500 mt, and over the last 10 years
landings have averaged approximately 6,000 mt without exceeding 10,000
mt. As a result, it is unlikely that the ACT proposed in this rule will
limit the potential profitability of the fleet from Pacific mackerel.
Accordingly, vessels' profits are not expected to be altered as a
result of this rule as it relates to recent catches in the fishery and
the previous season's regulation.
Based on the disproportionality and profitability analysis above,
this rule, if adopted, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of these small entities. As a result, an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required, and none has been
prepared.
There are no reporting, record-keeping, or other compliance
requirements required by this proposed rule. Additionally, no other
Federal rules duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule.
This action does not contain a collection-of-information
requirement for purposes of the Paper Reduction Act.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 3, 2012.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-29621 Filed 12-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P