Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Pima County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan; Pima County, AZ, 73045-73048 [2012-29391]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 236 / Friday, December 7, 2012 / Notices
Ft. Knox
Ft. Knox KY 40121
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240043
Status: Unutilized
Directions: 5260, 5261, 6589, 7718, 7726,
7727, 7728, 9247
Comments: Located on secured military
installation, where public access is denied
& no alternative method to gain access
without compromising national security.
Reasons: Secured Area
8 Buildings
Ft. Knox
Ft. Knox KY 40121
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240047
Status: Unutilized
Directions: 93, 430, 445, 1414, 2768, 2798,
4016
Comments: Located in secured area; public
access denied & no alternative method to
gain access w/out compromising nat’l
security
Reasons: Secured Area
Maryland
2 Buildings
Aberdeen Proving Ground
Aberdeen MD 21005
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240048
Status: Unutilized
Directions: 306 and 5043
Comments: Located in secured area; public
access denied and no alternative method to
gain access w/out compromising nat’l
security
Reasons: Secured Area
Missouri
4 Buildings
Ft. Leonard Wood
Ft. Leonard Wood MO 65473
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240017
Status: Unutilized
Directions: 691, 692, 693, 694
Comments: Located in secured area, public
access denied & no alternative method to
gain access without compromising national
security.
Reasons: Secured Area
North Carolina
2 Buildings
Ft. Bragg
Ft. Bragg NC 28310
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240015
Status: Underutilized
Directions: W2976, W2979
Comments: Located on secured military
installation; authorized personnel only;
public access denied & no alternative
method to gain access w/out compromising
nat’l security
Reasons: Secured Area
4 Buildings
Ft. Bragg
Ft. Bragg NC 28310
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240016
Status: Unutilized
Directions: M6135, M6151, O3305, O4305
Comments: Located on secured military
installation; authorized personnel only;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Dec 06, 2012
Jkt 229001
public access denied & no alternative
method to gain access w/out compromising
nat’l security
Reasons: Secured Area
6 Buildings
Ft. Bragg
Ft. Bragg NC 28310
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240031
Status: Unutilized
Directions: J1951, A5786, A5785, A5679,
A4290, A3275
Comments: Located in secured military
installation, public access denied & no
alternative method to gain access without
compromising national security.
Reasons: Secured Area
5 Buildings
Ft. Bragg
Ft. Bragg NC 28310
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240033
Status: Unutilized
Directions: 85306, A5624, D1910, H4401,
H4802
Comments: Located in restricted area, public
access denied & no alternative method to
gain access without compromising national
security
Reasons: Secured Area
4 Buildings
Ft. Bragg
Cumberland NC 28308
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240036
Status: Unutilized
Directions: 15, 115, 32033, 41442
Comments: Located in a secured military
installation, public access denied and no
alternative method to gain access without
compromising national security.
Reasons: Secured Area
Ohio
Site #39225
Defense Supply Center
Columbus OH 43218
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240042
Status: Underutilized
Directions: 00016, 01017
Comments: Located in a secured military
installation, public access denied and no
alternative method to gain access without
compromising national security.
Reasons: Secured Area
Vermont
6 Buildings
Ethan Allen Range
Jericho VT 05465
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240035
Status: Unutilized
Directions: 004–2,004–3, 03020, 04009,
04010, 04011
Comments: Located on secured military
installation where public access is denied
& no alternative method to gain access
without compromising national security
Reasons: Secured Area
Virginia
Building 238
Joint Base Mayer-Henderson Hall
Ft. Myer VA 22211
Landholding Agency: Army
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73045
Property Number: 21201240025
Status: Unutilized
Directions: 238
Comments: Located in secured area, public
access denied and no alternative meted to
gain access without compromising national
security.
Reasons: Secured Area
Washington
5 Buildings
Joint Base Lewis McChord
Joint Base Lewis McChord WA 98433
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201240046
Status: Unutilized
Directions: 2205, 2206, 2260, 2265, 6182
Comments: Located on secured military
cantonment area where public access is
denied & no alternative method to gain
access without compromising national
security
Reasons: Secured Area
[FR Doc. 2012–29355 Filed 12–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2012–N025;
FXES11120200000F2–134–FF02ENEH00]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
and Draft Pima County Multi-Species
Habitat Conservation Plan; Pima
County, AZ
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; notice of
public meetings.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have received
an application from Pima County and
the Pima County Regional Flood Control
District (applicants) for an incidental
take permit (ITP) under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
The application has been assigned
permit number TE84356A. If approved,
the permit would be in effect for a
period of 30 years, and would authorize
incidental take of 5 animal species and
impacts to 2 plant species currently
listed under the Act, as well as impacts
to 4 candidate species and 33 species
that may become listed under the Act in
the future (collectively, ‘‘covered
species’’). The proposed incidental take
or impacts would occur in Pima County
and adjacent counties in Arizona, as a
result of specific actions conducted
under the authority of the applicants.
We are making the application and
associated documents available for
public review, and we invite public
comments.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive any comments on or before
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
73046
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 236 / Friday, December 7, 2012 / Notices
March 15, 2013. We will also accept
written comments at a public meeting to
be held on February 21, 2013, from 4:00
p.m. to 6:00 p.m. (see address below).
We must receive any requests for
additional public meetings, in writing,
at the address shown in the ADDRESSES
section by January 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The public informational
meeting will be held at the Pima County
Natural Resources Parks and Recreation
Conference Room at 3500 W. River
Road, Tucson, AZ 85741. Send requests
for additional public meetings to the
Field Supervisor, Arizona Ecological
Services Office, 2321 West Royal Palm
Road, Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ 85021. To
obtain documents for review and submit
comments, see ‘‘Reviewing Documents
and Submitting Comments’’ in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Permit Application, Draft Pima County
Multi-Species Conservation Plan, draft
Environmental Impact Statement, and
draft Implementing Agreement: Contact
Jeff Servoss, by U.S. mail at the Arizona
Ecological Services Office—Tucson
Suboffice, 201 N. Bonita Avenue, Suite
141, Tucson, AZ 85745; by telephone at
520–670–6150 extension 231; or by
email at jeff_servoss@fws.gov. Download
copies for review at: https://
www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), we advise the public that:
1. We have gathered the information
necessary to determine the impacts and
formulate the alternatives for the draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
related to the potential issuance of an
Incidental Take Permit (ITP) to the
Applicants; and
2. Pima County has developed a draft
habitat conservation plan—the Pima
County Multi-Species Conservation Plan
(MSCP), which describes the measures
Pima County has agreed to implement to
minimize and mitigate the effects of the
proposed incidental take of federally
listed species, and unlisted covered
species, to the maximum extent
practicable, pursuant to section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species
Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (Act).
If approved, the 30-year ITP would
authorize incidental take of 40 animal
species. Among the 40 species are 5
species currently listed under the Act:
• Southwestern willow flycatcher
(Empidonax traillii extimus)
• Lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris
curasoae yerbabuenae)
• Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis
occidentalis)
• Gila chub (Gila intermedia)
• Chiricahua leopard frog (Lithobates
chiricahuensis)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Dec 06, 2012
Jkt 229001
Also among the 40 species are 4
candidate species:
• Northern Mexican gartersnake
(Thamnophis eques megalops)
• Western yellow-billed cuckoo
(Coccyzus americanus)
• Tucson shovel-nosed snake
(Chionactis occipitalis klauberi)
• Desert tortoise, Sonoran population
(Gopherus agassizii)
The 40 species also include 31 species
that would be covered should they
become listed under the Act within the
term of the permit:
• Mexican long-tongued bat
(Choeronycteris mexicana)
• Western red bat (Lasiurus
blossevillii)
• Southern yellow bat (Lasiurus
xanthinus)
• California leaf-nosed bat (Macrotus
californicus)
• Pale Townsend’s big-eared bat
(Plecotus townsendii pallescens)
• Merriam’s mouse (Peromyscus
merriami)
• Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia
hypugaea)
• Cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl
(Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum)
• Rufous-winged sparrow (Aimophila
carpalis)
• Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni)
• Abert’s towhee (Pipilo aberti)
• Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii)
• Desert box turtle (Terrapene ornata
luteola)
• Ground-snake (Sonora
semiannulata)
• Giant spotted whiptail
(Aspidoscelis burti stictogramma)
• Lowland leopard frog (Lithobates
yavapaiensis)
• Longfin dace (Agosia chrysogaster)
• Desert sucker (Catostomus clarki)
• Sonora sucker (Catostomus insignis)
• San Xavier talus snail (Sonorella
eremite)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
ambigua ambigua syn. papagorum)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
imperatrix)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
imperialis)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
magdalenensis syn. tumamocensis)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
odorata odorata syn. Marmoris)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
insignis)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
rinconensis)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
sabinoenis buehmanensis)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
sabinoensis tucsonica)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
sitiens sitiens)
• Talus snail species (Sonorella
tortillita)
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Although take of listed plant species
is not prohibited under the Act, plant
species may be included in a habitat
conservation plan to formally document
the conservation benefits provided to
them through that process. The
applicants propose four plant species
for coverage under their MSCP,
including two listed species (Huachuca
water umbel (Lilaeopsis schaffneriana
recurva) and Pima pineapple cactus
(Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina))
and two unlisted species (needle-spined
pineapple cactus (Echinomastus
erectocentrus var. erectocentrus) and
Tumamoc globeberry (Tumamoca
macdougalii)).
The proposed incidental take would
occur within Pima County, Arizona, as
a result of impacts from actions
occurring under the authority of the
applicants. The applicants have
completed a draft habitat conservation
plan as part of the application package,
as required by the Act. The application
and associated documents describe
measures the applicants have agreed to
implement to minimize and mitigate—
to the maximum extent practicable—the
effects of the proposed incidental take of
covered species and impacts to habitats
on which they depend. The draft EIS
considers the direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects of the proposed
action of permit issuance, including the
measures that will be implemented to
minimize and mitigate such impacts to
the maximum extent practicable.
Background
In the past 50 years, Pima County,
Arizona, has had one of the fastest
growing human populations of any
county in the United States (an increase
of just under 500 percent), as a result of
a sunny climate, natural beauty, and
economic opportunities. Urban growth
has resulted in significant development,
which is expected to continue in the
foreseeable future. A significant
proportion of the predicted future
development is anticipated to occur in
the undeveloped or underdeveloped
areas, particularly in the eastern portion
of the county.
The presence of threatened and
endangered species in the areas of
potential land development creates
regulatory concerns in Pima County.
Interest in conservation and its potential
related costs (e.g., land acquisition or
set-asides) is found across many
segments of the community, ranging
from environmental advocates
promoting strengthened protections, to
members of the business community,
the development industry, and real
estate profession, all of whom may be
concerned about potential economic
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 236 / Friday, December 7, 2012 / Notices
impacts. Landowners and private
property interests are concerned about
how their land-use decisions can
potentially be affected by the presence
of federally listed threatened and
endangered species.
A long-term solution to ensure
compliance with the Act, particularly in
areas such as Pima County, where there
are multiple listed and unlisted species
of concern, is to develop a multi-species
habitat conservation plan (MSCP). The
Pima County MSCP proposes a
combination of long-term and shortterm actions and long-range planning to
protect and enhance the natural
environment. The Pima County MSCP
would help guide public investments in
both infrastructure and conservation, as
well as establish the applicants’
preferences for the expenditure of funds
to preserve and reduce the threats posed
by urbanization to habitat through ranch
conservation and open space programs.
If the Service approves the ITP, the
applicants would commit to a series of
measures that would avoid, minimize,
and mitigate impacts of covered
activities on the covered species. The
commitments vary according to the
alternatives described below and would
have differing impacts on
socioeconomics, habitat, and other
aspects of the environment.
The objective of the Pima County
MSCP is to achieve a balance between:
• Long-term conservation of the
diversity of natural vegetation
communities and native species of
plants and animals that make up an
important part of the natural heritage
and allure of Pima County; and
• The orderly use of land to promote
a sustainable economy, health, wellbeing, customs, and culture of the
growing population of Pima County.
In addition, the Pima County MSCP
has been designed to:
• Meet the requirements for the
applicants to receive an ITP—pursuant
to section 10 of the Act—that would
allow for the incidental take of
threatened and endangered species
while engaging in otherwise lawful
activities.
• Provide conservation benefits to
species and ecosystems in Pima County
that would not otherwise occur without
the MSCP.
• Maximize flexibility and available
options in developing mitigation and
conservation programs.
• Minimize uncoordinated decision
making, which can result in incremental
habitat loss and inefficient project
review.
• Provide a decision-making
framework that minimizes habitat loss
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Dec 06, 2012
Jkt 229001
and maximizes the efficiency of publicsector projects.
• Provide the applicants and their
community stakeholders (participants)
with long-term planning assurances.
• Cover an appropriate range of
activities under the permit.
• Reduce the regulatory burden of
compliance with the Act for the
applicants and all affected participants.
• Avoid, minimize, and mitigate for
the impacts of activities that would
result in take of threatened and
endangered species and provide longterm management and monitoring
programs to help ensure program
effectiveness.
• Designate the funding that would be
available to implement the Pima County
MSCP over the entirety of its proposed
term.
Purpose and Need for Action
We prepared the draft EIS to respond
to the applicants’ request for an ITP for
the proposed covered species related to
activities that have the potential to
result in incidental take. The need for
this action is based on the potential that
activities proposed by the applicants on
lands under their jurisdiction could
result in incidental take of covered
species, thus requiring an ITP. Section
9 of the Act prohibits the ‘‘taking’’ of
threatened and endangered species. We
are authorized, however, under limited
circumstances, to issue permits to take
federally listed species, when such a
taking is incidental to, and not the
purpose of, otherwise lawful activities.
Regulations governing permits for
endangered and threatened species are
in the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32,
respectively. The term ‘‘take’’ under the
Act means to harass, harm, pursue,
hunt, shoot, would, kill, trap, capture,
or collect endangered and threatened
species, or to attempt to engage in any
such conduct. Our regulations define
‘‘harm’’ as significant habitat
modification or degradation that results
in death or injury to listed species by
significantly impairing essential
behavioral patterns, including breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). The
proposed ITP would authorize
incidental take that is consistent with
the conservation guidelines in the
applicants’ MSCP. The development
and implementation of the MSCP will
ensure that the Applicants meet the
criteria for issuance of the ITP found in
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act:
1. The taking will be incidental;
2. The applicants will, to the
maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impact of such taking;
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73047
3. The applicants will develop a
proposed conservation plan and ensure
that adequate funding for the plan will
be provided;
4. The taking will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of the survival
and recovery of the species in the wild;
and
5. The applicants will carry out any
other measures that the Service may
require as being necessary or
appropriate.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is the issuance of
an ITP for covered species within the
permit area, principally located in Pima
County, Arizona, under section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Incidental take
anticipated under this ITP application is
species- and location-specific, and may
include lethal take of individuals, as
well as take in the form of harm through
habitat loss or modification. The
applicants would develop and
implement the MSCP, as required by
section 10(a)(2)(A) of the Act. The
MSCP will describe the measures the
applicants have agreed to implement to
minimize and mitigate the effects of the
proposed incidental take on covered
species and their habitats. The goal of
the MSCP is to provide long-term
protection for multiple species of
concern by avoiding, minimizing, and
mitigating covered impacts; improving
habitat conditions and ecosystem
functions necessary for their survival;
and to ensure that any incidental take of
listed species will not reduce the
likelihood of their survival and recovery
in the wild.
The requested duration of the ITP is
30 years. The areas covered by the
proposed ITP include: (1) Lands owned
by the applicants, including those
within the cities and towns of Tucson,
Marana, Oro Valley, and Sahuarita, and
adjacent counties; (2) lands where the
applicants construct or maintain
infrastructure, including lands within
the cities and towns of Tucson, Marana,
Oro Valley, and Sahuarita, and adjacent
counties; (3) State lands that are or
would be leased by the applicants or
used as road easements; (4) private
lands in unincorporated Pima County
under the regulatory authority of the
applicants; and (5) certain State Trust
and Federal lands for which the title has
been acquired by private entities or the
applicants and thus have become
subject to regulatory control of the
applicants. Activities proposed for
coverage under the ITP include, but are
not limited to, undertakings by the
applicants such as construction and
maintenance activities and certain
permits and approvals issued that allow
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
73048
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 236 / Friday, December 7, 2012 / Notices
for ground disturbance on privately
owned properties. The proposed MSCP
includes an opt-in program whereby
certain private entities, on a voluntary
basis, could gain coverage for their
lands under the applicants’ ITP. The
total acreage of impact for all covered
activities would be capped at 36,000
acres.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Alternatives
The following is a brief summary of
the four alternatives evaluated in the
draft EIS and draft MSCP (for details,
refer to those documents):
1. No Action Alternative. The
applicants would not request and the
Service would not issue a Section
10(a)(1)(B) permit. This alternative
would require the applicants and
developers of certain privately owned
lands to evaluate each project or action
on a case-by-case basis to address issues
under the Act and avoid take of
federally listed species. This alternative
is the baseline against which the effects
of the other alternatives are compared.
2. Permit for Applicants’ Activities
Only. The Service would issue a section
10(a)(1)(B) permit for coverage of 44
species that would apply only to
activities that the applicants undertake.
3. Permit for Applicants’ Activities
and Automatic Coverage of Private
Development Activities for which the
County issues permits and approvals.
Under this alternative, the Service
would issue a section 10(a)(1)(B) permit
for coverage of 44 species that would
apply to activities that the applicants
undertake, and would also cover most
ground-disturbing private development
within unincorporated Pima County, at
no additional cost to the developer, for
which the county issues a permit or
approves a plan.
4. Preferred Alternative: Permit for
Applicants’ Activities and Certain
Private Development Activities, some of
which gain permit coverage with an optin provision. The Service would issue a
section 10(a)(1)(B) permit for coverage
of 44 species that would apply to
activities that the applicants undertake,
that would confer automatic coverage to
a specified set of private development
activities, and would confer coverage to
certain private development activities
where the developer voluntarily
exercises the opt-in provision.
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new
information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community,
Tribes, industry, or any other interested
party regarding this notice. We will
consider these comments in developing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Dec 06, 2012
Jkt 229001
a final EIS, final MSCP, and the
incidental take permit (ITP). We
particularly seek comments on the
following:
1. Additional biological information
relevant to the species, including
information concerning the range,
distribution, population size, and
population trends of the species;
2. Current or planned activities in the
subject area and their possible impacts
on the species;
3. The presence of archeological sites,
buildings and structures, historic
events, sacred and traditional areas, and
other historic preservation concerns,
which are required to be considered in
project planning by the National
Historic Preservation Act; and
4. Identification of any other
environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed
MSCP and permit decision.
Reviewing Documents
Please refer to TE84356A when
requesting documents or submitting
comments.
Downloadable copies of the draft
MSCP and draft Implementing
Agreement (IA) may be found on the
Internet at https://www.pima.gov/cmo/
sdcp/MSCP/MSCP.html and the draft
EIS is available at https://www.fws.gov/
southwest/es/arizona. For those without
access to the Internet, a printed or CD–
ROM copy of these documents is
available upon request to Ms. Julia
Fonseca, Pima County Office of
Sustainability and Conservation, 201 N.
Stone, 6th floor, Tucson, AZ 85701,
phone (520) 740–6460, or email
mscp@pima.gov. Additionally, persons
wishing to review the draft MSCP, draft
IA, and draft EIS may obtain copies by
calling or faxing the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (520–670–6144, phone;
520–670–6155 fax).
The application, draft MSCP, draft IA,
and draft EIS will also be available for
public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours (8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m.) at the Arizona Ecological
Services Office, 2321 West Royal Palm
Road, Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ 85021.
Submitting Comments
During the public comment period
(see DATES), submit your written
comments or data to the Field
Supervisor at the Phoenix address
above. Comments will also be accepted
by fax at the number above, as well as
by email to PimaMSCP@fws.gov with
the subject line ‘‘Pima County Draft
MSCP and Draft EIS.’’
Comments submitted are available for
public review at the Tucson address
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
CONTACT.
This generally means that any
personal information you provide to us
will be available to anyone reviewing
the public comments (see the Public
Availability of Comments section below
for more information).
Copies of the draft MSCP, draft IA,
and draft EIS are also available for
public inspection and review at the
locations listed below:
• Pima County Public Library,
Miller–Golf Links Branch Library 9640
E. Golf Links Road, Tucson, AZ 85730
• Pima County Public Library, Joel D.
Valdez Main Library 101 North Stone
Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701
• Pima County Public Library,
Caviglia-Arivaca Branch Library 17050
W. Arivaca Rd., Arivaca, AZ 85601
• Pima County Public Library,
Sahuarita Branch Library 725 W. Via
Rancho Sahuarita, Sahuarita, AZ 85629
• Pima County Public Library,
Salazar-Ajo Branch Library 33 Plaza,
Ajo, AZ 85321
• Pima County Public Library, GeasaMarana Branch Library 13370 N. Lon
Adams Rd., Marana, AZ 85653
• Pima County Office of
Sustainability and Conservation (by
appointment only) 201 N. Stone, 6th
floor, Tucson, AZ 85701
Public Availability of Comments
Written comments we receive become
part of the public record associated with
this action. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that the entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
We provide this notice under section
10(c) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
and its implementing regulations (50
CFR 17.22 and 17.32), and NEPA (42
U.S.C. 4371 et seq.) and its
implementing regulations (40 CFR
1506.6).
Joy E. Nicholopoulos,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region,
Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 2012–29391 Filed 12–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–55–P
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 236 (Friday, December 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73045-73048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29391]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R2-ES-2012-N025; FXES11120200000F2-134-FF02ENEH00]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Pima County Multi-
Species Habitat Conservation Plan; Pima County, AZ
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; notice of public meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have
received an application from Pima County and the Pima County Regional
Flood Control District (applicants) for an incidental take permit (ITP)
under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The
application has been assigned permit number TE84356A. If approved, the
permit would be in effect for a period of 30 years, and would authorize
incidental take of 5 animal species and impacts to 2 plant species
currently listed under the Act, as well as impacts to 4 candidate
species and 33 species that may become listed under the Act in the
future (collectively, ``covered species''). The proposed incidental
take or impacts would occur in Pima County and adjacent counties in
Arizona, as a result of specific actions conducted under the authority
of the applicants. We are making the application and associated
documents available for public review, and we invite public comments.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive any comments on or
before
[[Page 73046]]
March 15, 2013. We will also accept written comments at a public
meeting to be held on February 21, 2013, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
(see address below). We must receive any requests for additional public
meetings, in writing, at the address shown in the ADDRESSES section by
January 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The public informational meeting will be held at the Pima
County Natural Resources Parks and Recreation Conference Room at 3500
W. River Road, Tucson, AZ 85741. Send requests for additional public
meetings to the Field Supervisor, Arizona Ecological Services Office,
2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ 85021. To obtain
documents for review and submit comments, see ``Reviewing Documents and
Submitting Comments'' in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Permit Application, Draft Pima County
Multi-Species Conservation Plan, draft Environmental Impact Statement,
and draft Implementing Agreement: Contact Jeff Servoss, by U.S. mail at
the Arizona Ecological Services Office--Tucson Suboffice, 201 N. Bonita
Avenue, Suite 141, Tucson, AZ 85745; by telephone at 520-670-6150
extension 231; or by email at jeff_servoss@fws.gov. Download copies
for review at: https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), we advise the public that:
1. We have gathered the information necessary to determine the
impacts and formulate the alternatives for the draft Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS), related to the potential issuance of an
Incidental Take Permit (ITP) to the Applicants; and
2. Pima County has developed a draft habitat conservation plan--the
Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan (MSCP), which describes the
measures Pima County has agreed to implement to minimize and mitigate
the effects of the proposed incidental take of federally listed
species, and unlisted covered species, to the maximum extent
practicable, pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species
Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (Act).
If approved, the 30-year ITP would authorize incidental take of 40
animal species. Among the 40 species are 5 species currently listed
under the Act:
Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii
extimus)
Lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae)
Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis)
Gila chub (Gila intermedia)
Chiricahua leopard frog (Lithobates chiricahuensis)
Also among the 40 species are 4 candidate species:
Northern Mexican gartersnake (Thamnophis eques megalops)
Western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus)
Tucson shovel-nosed snake (Chionactis occipitalis
klauberi)
Desert tortoise, Sonoran population (Gopherus agassizii)
The 40 species also include 31 species that would be covered should
they become listed under the Act within the term of the permit:
Mexican long-tongued bat (Choeronycteris mexicana)
Western red bat (Lasiurus blossevillii)
Southern yellow bat (Lasiurus xanthinus)
California leaf-nosed bat (Macrotus californicus)
Pale Townsend's big-eared bat (Plecotus townsendii
pallescens)
Merriam's mouse (Peromyscus merriami)
Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea)
Cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum
cactorum)
Rufous-winged sparrow (Aimophila carpalis)
Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni)
Abert's towhee (Pipilo aberti)
Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii)
Desert box turtle (Terrapene ornata luteola)
Ground-snake (Sonora semiannulata)
Giant spotted whiptail (Aspidoscelis burti stictogramma)
Lowland leopard frog (Lithobates yavapaiensis)
Longfin dace (Agosia chrysogaster)
Desert sucker (Catostomus clarki)
Sonora sucker (Catostomus insignis)
San Xavier talus snail (Sonorella eremite)
Talus snail species (Sonorella ambigua ambigua syn.
papagorum)
Talus snail species (Sonorella imperatrix)
Talus snail species (Sonorella imperialis)
Talus snail species (Sonorella magdalenensis syn.
tumamocensis)
Talus snail species (Sonorella odorata odorata syn.
Marmoris)
Talus snail species (Sonorella insignis)
Talus snail species (Sonorella rinconensis)
Talus snail species (Sonorella sabinoenis buehmanensis)
Talus snail species (Sonorella sabinoensis tucsonica)
Talus snail species (Sonorella sitiens sitiens)
Talus snail species (Sonorella tortillita)
Although take of listed plant species is not prohibited under the
Act, plant species may be included in a habitat conservation plan to
formally document the conservation benefits provided to them through
that process. The applicants propose four plant species for coverage
under their MSCP, including two listed species (Huachuca water umbel
(Lilaeopsis schaffneriana recurva) and Pima pineapple cactus
(Coryphantha scheeri var. robustispina)) and two unlisted species
(needle-spined pineapple cactus (Echinomastus erectocentrus var.
erectocentrus) and Tumamoc globeberry (Tumamoca macdougalii)).
The proposed incidental take would occur within Pima County,
Arizona, as a result of impacts from actions occurring under the
authority of the applicants. The applicants have completed a draft
habitat conservation plan as part of the application package, as
required by the Act. The application and associated documents describe
measures the applicants have agreed to implement to minimize and
mitigate--to the maximum extent practicable--the effects of the
proposed incidental take of covered species and impacts to habitats on
which they depend. The draft EIS considers the direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects of the proposed action of permit issuance, including
the measures that will be implemented to minimize and mitigate such
impacts to the maximum extent practicable.
Background
In the past 50 years, Pima County, Arizona, has had one of the
fastest growing human populations of any county in the United States
(an increase of just under 500 percent), as a result of a sunny
climate, natural beauty, and economic opportunities. Urban growth has
resulted in significant development, which is expected to continue in
the foreseeable future. A significant proportion of the predicted
future development is anticipated to occur in the undeveloped or
underdeveloped areas, particularly in the eastern portion of the
county.
The presence of threatened and endangered species in the areas of
potential land development creates regulatory concerns in Pima County.
Interest in conservation and its potential related costs (e.g., land
acquisition or set-asides) is found across many segments of the
community, ranging from environmental advocates promoting strengthened
protections, to members of the business community, the development
industry, and real estate profession, all of whom may be concerned
about potential economic
[[Page 73047]]
impacts. Landowners and private property interests are concerned about
how their land-use decisions can potentially be affected by the
presence of federally listed threatened and endangered species.
A long-term solution to ensure compliance with the Act,
particularly in areas such as Pima County, where there are multiple
listed and unlisted species of concern, is to develop a multi-species
habitat conservation plan (MSCP). The Pima County MSCP proposes a
combination of long-term and short-term actions and long-range planning
to protect and enhance the natural environment. The Pima County MSCP
would help guide public investments in both infrastructure and
conservation, as well as establish the applicants' preferences for the
expenditure of funds to preserve and reduce the threats posed by
urbanization to habitat through ranch conservation and open space
programs. If the Service approves the ITP, the applicants would commit
to a series of measures that would avoid, minimize, and mitigate
impacts of covered activities on the covered species. The commitments
vary according to the alternatives described below and would have
differing impacts on socioeconomics, habitat, and other aspects of the
environment.
The objective of the Pima County MSCP is to achieve a balance
between:
Long-term conservation of the diversity of natural
vegetation communities and native species of plants and animals that
make up an important part of the natural heritage and allure of Pima
County; and
The orderly use of land to promote a sustainable economy,
health, well-being, customs, and culture of the growing population of
Pima County.
In addition, the Pima County MSCP has been designed to:
Meet the requirements for the applicants to receive an
ITP--pursuant to section 10 of the Act--that would allow for the
incidental take of threatened and endangered species while engaging in
otherwise lawful activities.
Provide conservation benefits to species and ecosystems in
Pima County that would not otherwise occur without the MSCP.
Maximize flexibility and available options in developing
mitigation and conservation programs.
Minimize uncoordinated decision making, which can result
in incremental habitat loss and inefficient project review.
Provide a decision-making framework that minimizes habitat
loss and maximizes the efficiency of public-sector projects.
Provide the applicants and their community stakeholders
(participants) with long-term planning assurances.
Cover an appropriate range of activities under the permit.
Reduce the regulatory burden of compliance with the Act
for the applicants and all affected participants.
Avoid, minimize, and mitigate for the impacts of
activities that would result in take of threatened and endangered
species and provide long-term management and monitoring programs to
help ensure program effectiveness.
Designate the funding that would be available to implement
the Pima County MSCP over the entirety of its proposed term.
Purpose and Need for Action
We prepared the draft EIS to respond to the applicants' request for
an ITP for the proposed covered species related to activities that have
the potential to result in incidental take. The need for this action is
based on the potential that activities proposed by the applicants on
lands under their jurisdiction could result in incidental take of
covered species, thus requiring an ITP. Section 9 of the Act prohibits
the ``taking'' of threatened and endangered species. We are authorized,
however, under limited circumstances, to issue permits to take
federally listed species, when such a taking is incidental to, and not
the purpose of, otherwise lawful activities. Regulations governing
permits for endangered and threatened species are in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32, respectively. The
term ``take'' under the Act means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
would, kill, trap, capture, or collect endangered and threatened
species, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. Our regulations
define ``harm'' as significant habitat modification or degradation that
results in death or injury to listed species by significantly impairing
essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). The proposed ITP would authorize incidental
take that is consistent with the conservation guidelines in the
applicants' MSCP. The development and implementation of the MSCP will
ensure that the Applicants meet the criteria for issuance of the ITP
found in section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act:
1. The taking will be incidental;
2. The applicants will, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impact of such taking;
3. The applicants will develop a proposed conservation plan and
ensure that adequate funding for the plan will be provided;
4. The taking will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the
survival and recovery of the species in the wild; and
5. The applicants will carry out any other measures that the
Service may require as being necessary or appropriate.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is the issuance of an ITP for covered species
within the permit area, principally located in Pima County, Arizona,
under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Incidental take anticipated under
this ITP application is species- and location-specific, and may include
lethal take of individuals, as well as take in the form of harm through
habitat loss or modification. The applicants would develop and
implement the MSCP, as required by section 10(a)(2)(A) of the Act. The
MSCP will describe the measures the applicants have agreed to implement
to minimize and mitigate the effects of the proposed incidental take on
covered species and their habitats. The goal of the MSCP is to provide
long-term protection for multiple species of concern by avoiding,
minimizing, and mitigating covered impacts; improving habitat
conditions and ecosystem functions necessary for their survival; and to
ensure that any incidental take of listed species will not reduce the
likelihood of their survival and recovery in the wild.
The requested duration of the ITP is 30 years. The areas covered by
the proposed ITP include: (1) Lands owned by the applicants, including
those within the cities and towns of Tucson, Marana, Oro Valley, and
Sahuarita, and adjacent counties; (2) lands where the applicants
construct or maintain infrastructure, including lands within the cities
and towns of Tucson, Marana, Oro Valley, and Sahuarita, and adjacent
counties; (3) State lands that are or would be leased by the applicants
or used as road easements; (4) private lands in unincorporated Pima
County under the regulatory authority of the applicants; and (5)
certain State Trust and Federal lands for which the title has been
acquired by private entities or the applicants and thus have become
subject to regulatory control of the applicants. Activities proposed
for coverage under the ITP include, but are not limited to,
undertakings by the applicants such as construction and maintenance
activities and certain permits and approvals issued that allow
[[Page 73048]]
for ground disturbance on privately owned properties. The proposed MSCP
includes an opt-in program whereby certain private entities, on a
voluntary basis, could gain coverage for their lands under the
applicants' ITP. The total acreage of impact for all covered activities
would be capped at 36,000 acres.
Alternatives
The following is a brief summary of the four alternatives evaluated
in the draft EIS and draft MSCP (for details, refer to those
documents):
1. No Action Alternative. The applicants would not request and the
Service would not issue a Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit. This alternative
would require the applicants and developers of certain privately owned
lands to evaluate each project or action on a case-by-case basis to
address issues under the Act and avoid take of federally listed
species. This alternative is the baseline against which the effects of
the other alternatives are compared.
2. Permit for Applicants' Activities Only. The Service would issue
a section 10(a)(1)(B) permit for coverage of 44 species that would
apply only to activities that the applicants undertake.
3. Permit for Applicants' Activities and Automatic Coverage of
Private Development Activities for which the County issues permits and
approvals. Under this alternative, the Service would issue a section
10(a)(1)(B) permit for coverage of 44 species that would apply to
activities that the applicants undertake, and would also cover most
ground-disturbing private development within unincorporated Pima
County, at no additional cost to the developer, for which the county
issues a permit or approves a plan.
4. Preferred Alternative: Permit for Applicants' Activities and
Certain Private Development Activities, some of which gain permit
coverage with an opt-in provision. The Service would issue a section
10(a)(1)(B) permit for coverage of 44 species that would apply to
activities that the applicants undertake, that would confer automatic
coverage to a specified set of private development activities, and
would confer coverage to certain private development activities where
the developer voluntarily exercises the opt-in provision.
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific
community, Tribes, industry, or any other interested party regarding
this notice. We will consider these comments in developing a final EIS,
final MSCP, and the incidental take permit (ITP). We particularly seek
comments on the following:
1. Additional biological information relevant to the species,
including information concerning the range, distribution, population
size, and population trends of the species;
2. Current or planned activities in the subject area and their
possible impacts on the species;
3. The presence of archeological sites, buildings and structures,
historic events, sacred and traditional areas, and other historic
preservation concerns, which are required to be considered in project
planning by the National Historic Preservation Act; and
4. Identification of any other environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed MSCP and permit decision.
Reviewing Documents
Please refer to TE84356A when requesting documents or submitting
comments.
Downloadable copies of the draft MSCP and draft Implementing
Agreement (IA) may be found on the Internet at https://www.pima.gov/cmo/sdcp/MSCP/MSCP.html and the draft EIS is available at https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona. For those without access to the
Internet, a printed or CD-ROM copy of these documents is available upon
request to Ms. Julia Fonseca, Pima County Office of Sustainability and
Conservation, 201 N. Stone, 6th floor, Tucson, AZ 85701, phone (520)
740-6460, or email mscp@pima.gov. Additionally, persons wishing to
review the draft MSCP, draft IA, and draft EIS may obtain copies by
calling or faxing the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (520-670-6144,
phone; 520-670-6155 fax).
The application, draft MSCP, draft IA, and draft EIS will also be
available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business
hours (8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) at the Arizona Ecological Services Office,
2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ 85021.
Submitting Comments
During the public comment period (see DATES), submit your written
comments or data to the Field Supervisor at the Phoenix address above.
Comments will also be accepted by fax at the number above, as well as
by email to PimaMSCP@fws.gov with the subject line ``Pima County Draft
MSCP and Draft EIS.''
Comments submitted are available for public review at the Tucson
address listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. This generally
means that any personal information you provide to us will be available
to anyone reviewing the public comments (see the Public Availability of
Comments section below for more information).
Copies of the draft MSCP, draft IA, and draft EIS are also
available for public inspection and review at the locations listed
below:
Pima County Public Library, Miller-Golf Links Branch
Library 9640 E. Golf Links Road, Tucson, AZ 85730
Pima County Public Library, Joel D. Valdez Main Library
101 North Stone Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701
Pima County Public Library, Caviglia-Arivaca Branch
Library 17050 W. Arivaca Rd., Arivaca, AZ 85601
Pima County Public Library, Sahuarita Branch Library 725
W. Via Rancho Sahuarita, Sahuarita, AZ 85629
Pima County Public Library, Salazar-Ajo Branch Library 33
Plaza, Ajo, AZ 85321
Pima County Public Library, Geasa-Marana Branch Library
13370 N. Lon Adams Rd., Marana, AZ 85653
Pima County Office of Sustainability and Conservation (by
appointment only) 201 N. Stone, 6th floor, Tucson, AZ 85701
Public Availability of Comments
Written comments we receive become part of the public record
associated with this action. Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other personal identifying information in
your comment, you should be aware that the entire comment--including
your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available
at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Authority
We provide this notice under section 10(c) of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 17.22 and
17.32), and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.) and its implementing
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
Joy E. Nicholopoulos,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 2012-29391 Filed 12-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-55-P