Informal Entry Limit and Removal of a Formal Entry Requirement, 72715-72721 [2012-29193]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 235 / Thursday, December 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
4.9(c).20 Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General
Counsel, in his or her sole discretion,
grants your request in accordance with
the law and the public interest.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online. To make sure that the
Commission considers your online
comment, you must file it at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
redflagsinterimrule, by following the
instruction on the web-based form. If
this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/serach/Regs/
home.html#home, you may also file a
comment through that Web site.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ‘‘Red Flags Interim Final Rule’’ on
your comment and on the envelope, and
mail or deliver it to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, Room H–113
(Annex M), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20580. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Visit the Commission Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov to read this Interim
Final Rule and the news release
describing it. The FTC Act and other
laws that the Commission administers
permit the collection of public
comments to consider and use in this
proceeding as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely
and responsive public comments that it
receives on or before February 11, 2013.
You can find more information,
including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, in the Commission’s
privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/
ftc/privacy.htm.
(PRA).22 Nonetheless, the Commission
anticipates that the narrowed definition
of the term ‘‘creditor’’ will result in a
decrease in the number of creditors
covered by the Red Flags Rule.
Commission staff has proposed revised
estimates of hours and costs ‘‘burden’’
under the PRA in connection with the
FTC’s pursuit of renewed OMB
clearance for the Red Flags Rule (under
OMB Control No 3084–0137), which
currently runs through November 30,
2012. These estimates, which factor in
the anticipated effects of the amended
Rule, appear separately in the Federal
Register for public comment.23
VI. Communications by Outside Parties
to the Commissioners or Their Advisors
Written communications and
summaries of transcripts of oral
communications respecting the merits
of this proceeding from any outside
party to any Commissioner will be
placed on the public record.21
PART 681—IDENTITY THEFT RULES
VII. Regulatory Analysis
681.1 Duties regarding the detection,
prevention, and mitigation of identity theft.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
The interim final rule does not
include any new information collection
requirements under the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
20 In particular, the written request for
confidential treatment that accompanies the
comment must include the factual and legal basis
for the request, and must identify the specific
portions of the comment to be withheld from the
public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
21 See 16 CFR 1.26(b)(5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Dec 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
72715
(5) Creditor has the same meaning as
in 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–29430 Filed 12–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601–612, requires that the
Commission provide an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
with a proposed rule and a Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA),
if any, with a final rule. As noted above,
the Commission finds that good cause
exists for adopting this interim final rule
without advance public notice or an
opportunity for public comment.
Because notice and comment is not
statutorily required, the requirement to
publish an analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act does not
apply in this proceeding.24
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 681
Consumer reports, Consumer report
users, Consumer reporting agencies,
Credit, Creditors, Fair credit,
Information furnishers, Identity theft,
Trade practices.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Commission amends part
681 of title 16 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
1. Revise the authority citation for part
681 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e); 15 U.S.C.
1681m(e)(4); 15 U.S.C. 1681c(h).
2. Revise 681.1(b)(5) to read as
follows:
■
*
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
22 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521. Under the PRA, federal
agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each
collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ means agency requests
or requirements that members of the public submit
reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. 44 U.S.C. 3502(3).
23 See 77 FR 58994 (Sept. 25, 2012) (comment
period ending Oct. 25, 2012).
24 5 U.S.C. 603, 604.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19 CFR Parts 10, 24, 102, 123, 128, 141,
143, 145, and 148
[USCBP–2011–0042, CBP Dec. 12–19]
RIN 1515–AD69
Informal Entry Limit and Removal of a
Formal Entry Requirement
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Currently, for any
merchandise valued over $2,000, CBP
requires importers to provide a surety
bond, complete CBP form 7501, and pay
a minimum of $25 in Merchandise
Processing Fees (MPF). The final rule
increases the limit, from $2,000 to
$2,500, for which merchandise may
qualify for an ‘‘informal entry’’, thereby
eliminating the need for a surety bond,
expediting the customs clearance
process, and reducing the required MPF
amount to $2 (assuming the entries are
filed electronically). CBP is increasing
the informal entry limit to mitigate the
effects of inflation and in addition, to
meet a commitment of the Beyond the
Border Initiative between the United
States and Canada, to increase and
harmonize the value thresholds to
$2,500 for expedited customs clearance
from the current levels of $2,000 for the
United States and $1,600 for Canada.
This document also removes the
language requiring formal entry for
certain articles that were formerly
subject to absolute quotas under the
Agreement on Textiles and Clothing
because CBP no longer needs to require
formal entries for these articles. This
document also makes a technical
conforming amendment to reflect a
recent statutory amendment that
increased the ad valorem Merchandise
Processing Fee (MPF) from 0.21 percent
to 0.3464 percent. Finally, this
document makes non-substantive
editorial and nomenclature changes.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
72716
DATES:
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 235 / Thursday, December 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Effective January 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elena Ryan, Acting Director, Trade
Facilitation and Administration
Division, Office of International Trade,
Customs and Border Protection, 202–
863–6578.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Background
On October 28, 2011, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register (76 FR 66875)
proposing to amend title 19 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (‘‘19 CFR’’) to
increase the informal entry limit from
$2,000 to $2,500, the maximum
statutory limit, in response to inflation
and thereby to reduce the burden on
importers and other entry filers. We
note that an increase of the informal
entry limit is also consistent with one of
the goals of the Beyond the Border
Initiative, which began on February 4,
2011, and encourages bilateral
cooperation between the United States
and Canada. Through the Beyond the
Border Initiative, the United States and
Canada have agreed to increase and
harmonize the value thresholds to
$2,500 for expedited customs clearance
from the current levels of $2,000 for the
United States and $1,600 for Canada.
(For further information on the Beyond
the Border Action Plan, see https://
www.dhs.gov/files/publications/beyondthe-border.shtm.) CBP also proposed to
remove the language requiring formal
entry for certain articles, because with
the elimination of absolute quotas under
the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing,
CBP no longer needs to require formal
entries for these articles. For further
details on the proposal, please reference
the published proposed rule.
CBP solicited public comments on the
proposed rule.
Technical Correction
This document also makes a technical
correction to conform the regulations to
reflect the statutory amendment to
section 13031(a)(9) of the Consolidated
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(9)) by section 2
of the Trade Adjustment Assistance
Extension Act of 2011 that increased the
ad valorem Merchandise Processing Fee
(MPF) of 0.21 percent to 0.3464 percent.
See Pub. L. 112–40, 125 Stat. 401
(October 23, 2011). The increased MPF
applies to imported merchandise
entered on or after October 1, 2011 until
June 30, 2014.
Discussion of Comments
Eighteen commenters responded to
the solicitation of public comments in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Dec 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
the proposed rule. These comments can
be found at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;dct=PS;rpp=25;po=0;
D=USCBP-2011-0042. The vast majority
of the commenters expressed support
for increasing the informal entry limit
and/or removing the formal entry list.
CBP’s responses to the comments are set
forth below.
Comment: Fifteen commenters
expressed general agreement with the
proposal to increase the informal entry
limit to $2,500. Fourteen of these fifteen
commenters agreed with the proposal to
remove the formal entry requirement for
certain articles and one commenter did
not comment on the proposal
concerning the formal entry
requirement.
CBP Response: CBP concurs with
proceeding to increase the informal
entry amount to its statutory limit and
to remove the formal entry requirement
for certain articles that were previously
subject to absolute quotas under the
Agreement on Textiles and Clothing.
Comment: One commenter questioned
whether filing an informal entry is less
time consuming and burdensome than
filing a formal entry. The commenter
stated that an importer must use due
diligence for both formal and informal
entries.
CBP Response: CBP notes that
importers filing by paper are required to
complete more data elements in the
formal entry paper form than in the
informal entry form. For example,
importers filing a formal entry paper
form are required to provide the
location of the goods, whereas importers
filing an informal entry paper form are
not required to provide this data
element. Therefore, for paper filers, the
informal entry is less time consuming.
The bulk of affected filings are
electronic, however, and in the
electronic format filers provide the same
data for both formal and informal
entries. CBP agrees that the importer
must use due diligence for filing both
informal and formal entries.
Comment: Two commenters indicated
that adjusting the informal entry limit to
reflect inflation from 1998 to 2011
would raise the amount to
approximately $2,800 rather than the
proposed $2,500. One commenter
suggested increasing the informal entry
limit to $3,000.
CBP Response: Although CBP agrees
that inflation would increase the
informal entry limit from $2,000 to
approximately $2,800, CBP is bound by
the statutory limit of $2,500.
Comment: One commenter asked
whether a study has been conducted to
determine how many entries between
the value of $2,000 and $2,500 would
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
have been filed in the past years if the
informal entry limit were $2,500.
CBP Response: As set forth in this
document (see the ‘‘Executive Orders
12866 and 13563’’ section), CBP
estimates that in fiscal year 2011 (the
latest year of available data), there were
approximately 852,000 formal entries
between the value of $2,000 and $2,500.
Approximately 558,000 of those entries
would have been affected by this rule
because they were required to pay
MPFs.
Comment: One commenter suggested
that CBP postpone the effective date of
the rule until 2015 because
promulgation of the rule would result in
a net loss of $11 million to the U.S.
Treasury. Two other commenters stated
that the timing of the policy seemed
inconsistent with the recent
Congressional decision to increase the
ad valorem MPFs by 60 percent. These
two commenters noted that CBP would
lose revenue from MPFs by increasing
the informal entry limit and one of these
commenters additionally noted that
removing the formal entry requirement
for textile and apparel entries would
reduce revenue further because of the
reduced collection of MPFs.
CBP Response: CBP notes that the
MPF is set by Congress and the level of
the MPF is beyond the scope of this
rule. The reduction in MPF for the
shipments which are affected by this
rule should facilitate trade.
Comment: Three commenters stated
that the analysis of the impact on small
entities was too conservative and did
not address the savings that would be
achieved by small and medium
businesses. Four commenters cited a
June 2011 study conducted by the
Peterson Institute for International
Economics (‘‘Peterson study’’) in
support of this statement and in support
of its statement that raising the informal
entry level would result in a substantial
savings to CBP, the United States Postal
Service, the express industry, and U.S.
consumers.
CBP Response: CBP has reviewed the
Peterson study, and while we agree that
this final rule could result in
meaningful benefits for the public, the
estimates in the study relied on
assumptions that CBP could not verify
or support. Given the limitations in the
data available for this analysis, CBP
cannot ascertain with any degree of
certainty the specific monetary impacts
to businesses based on size.
Comment: Two commenters
questioned CBP’s ability to conduct
post-entry audit on informal entries.
One commenter noted that the security
of the cargo and the accuracy of the
cargo’s description is at risk because
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 235 / Thursday, December 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
there is no review of incoming air cargo
prior to lading on board an aircraft. The
other commenter stated that a similar
issue would arise in the case of
antidumping and countervailing duties
entries that were not properly prepared.
CBP Response: CBP has the ability to
conduct post-entry audits on informal
entries because CBP has regulatory
auditors who conduct either scheduled
or random audits on importers’
liquidated entries to determine
compliance with applicable U.S. laws
and regulations. Moreover, CBP notes
that formal entries are required for all
antidumping and countervailing duties
entries. The commenter’s concern
regarding the security of the cargo prior
to lading is not impacted by raising the
informal entry limit because CBP
screens all manifested merchandise on
board the carrier without regard to its
value.
Comment: One commenter asserted
that CBP inspectors universally seem to
agree that a large percentage of import
violations occur when importers
inaccurately claim that their goods are
valued less than $2,000.
CBP Response: Even when entries are
informal, CBP reviews for correctness of
the entry and the admissibility of the
merchandise to ensure compliance with
applicable U.S. laws and regulations.
Comment: One commenter asked
whether Congress will allow resource
deviation from CBP’s enforcement
efforts to the further development of the
Automated Commercial Environment
(ACE) system.
CBP Response: The anticipated
actions of Congress are beyond the
scope of this rulemaking.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Conclusion
After review of the comments and
further consideration, CBP has decided
to adopt the proposed rule that was
published in the Federal Register (76
FR 66875) on October 28, 2011, with the
addition of the conforming technical
amendment to the MPF as discussed
above. Additional minor grammatical
and editorial changes were made in this
final rule.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Dec 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ although not
economically significant, under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). CBP has prepared the
following analysis to help inform
stakeholders of the potential impacts of
this final rule.
CBP requires importers to submit a
completed CBP Form 7501 (OMB
Control Number 1651–0022) or its
electronic equivalent with each entry of
merchandise for consumption.
Merchandise valued over $2,000
requires a formal entry, which generally
includes detailed information regarding
the import transaction as well as
commercial documents pertaining to the
transaction. In addition, a surety bond is
required, and the importer may take
possession of the merchandise before
duties and taxes are assessed. Currently,
merchandise valued below $2,000 may
be entered informally without a bond;
and duties and taxes are assessed
immediately. However, based on his/her
discretion, a port director, may require
a formal entry to be filed. This final rule
increases the ceiling for which
merchandise may qualify for an
informal entry from $2,000 to $2,500.
Unless exempt under a free trade
agreement and in addition to any duty
or tax owed, merchandise requiring a
formal entry was subject to a 0.21
percent ad valorem MPF, which may be
no greater than $485 and no less than
$25. Since the publication of the NPRM,
the ad valorem rate has increased from
0.21 percent to 0.3464 percent (starting
on October 1, 2011). Any merchandise
currently requiring a formal entry with
a value of $2,000 to $2,500 is subject to
the minimum $25 MPF. Entries that are
now considered informal entries as a
result of the change in the threshold
would now be subject to only a $2 MPF
(assuming they are filed electronically,
see 19 CFR 24.23(b)(2)(i)). In the NPRM,
CBP stated that in fiscal year (FY) 2009,
476,081 formal entries, valued between
$2,000 and $2,500, were processed
which were not subject to free trade
agreements and were subject to the $25
MPF. Since the publication of the
NPRM, these formal entries have
increased from 476,081 entries in FY
2009 to 558,259 entries for FY 2011.
Consequently, raising the informal entry
limited to $2,500 would result in a loss
of approximately $14 million in
revenues if the $25 MPF were not
collected for these entries in FY 2011
(558,259 × $25 = $14.0 million).
Revenues would now be approximately
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72717
$1 million (558,259 × $2 = $1.1 million),
thus the net loss in fees collected would
be approximately $13 million ($14
million ¥ $1 million). We note that the
estimated loss in net fees collected has
increased from approximately $11
million estimated in the NPRM to $13
million estimated here for the final rule.
Because the informal entry limit has
not kept pace with inflation, some
importers may have paid a higher MPF
than would have been required if the
informal entry limit had kept pace with
inflation. Due to data limitations CBP is
unable to determine the aggregate
savings any particular firm will realize
if this regulation is finalized. CBP
estimates importers as a whole,
however, will realize a benefit of
approximately $13 million when this
regulation is finalized. CBP notes that
this benefit to the trade represents a
transfer from the government.
Additionally, this increase in the
informal entry level meets the agreed
upon value of $2,500 for the Beyond the
Border Initiative. Harmonizing the
informal entry value thresholds of the
United States and Canada eliminates
one difference in the customs clearance
process.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This section examines the impact of
the rule on small entities as required by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et. seq.), as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement and
Fairness Act of 1996. A small entity may
be a small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated
business not dominant in its field that
qualifies as a small business per the
Small Business Act); a small not-forprofit organization; or a small
governmental jurisdiction (locality with
fewer than 50,000 people).
CBP has considered the impact of this
rule on small entities. To the extent that
this rule affects small entities, these
entities would experience a small cost
savings on a per-transaction basis. The
total cost savings per entity would be
based on its annual transaction levels.
CBP does not believe such a small cost
savings would rise to the level of a
‘‘significant economic impact.’’ During
the comment period for the NPRM, CBP
did not receive any comments that
would amend this conclusion. Thus,
CBP certifies that this rule will not have
a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
72718
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 235 / Thursday, December 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions are
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Executive Order 13132 requires CBP
to develop a process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.’’ Policies that have
federalism implications are defined in
the Executive Order to include rules
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ CBP has
analyzed the rule in accordance with
the principles and criteria in the
Executive Order and has determined
that it does not have federalism
implications or a substantial direct
effect on the States. The rule increases
the informal entry limit from $2,000 to
$2,500 and removes the formal entry
list. States do not conduct activities
with which this rule would interfere.
For this reason, this rule would not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This rule meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988. That
Executive Order requires agencies to
conduct reviews, before proposing
legislation or promulgating regulations,
to determine the impact of those
proposals on civil justice and potential
issues for litigation. The Order requires
that agencies make reasonable efforts to
ensure that a regulation clearly
identifies preemptive effects, effects on
existing Federal laws and regulations,
any retroactive effects of the proposal,
and other matters. CBP has determined
that this regulation meets the
requirements of Executive Order 12988
because it does not involve retroactive
effects, preemptive effects, or other
matters addressed in the Order.
National Environmental Policy Act
Increasing the informal entry limit,
removing the formal entry list, and
amending the regulations to reflect a
recent statutory amendment that
increased the ad valorem Merchandise
Processing Fee (MPF) from 0.21 percent
to 0.3464 percent, is non-invasive and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Dec 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
there is no potential environmental
impact of any kind. Therefore, an
environmental statement under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) is
not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information on the
Entry Summary and Informal Entry has
been previously reviewed and approved
by OMB in accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under
control number 1651–0022. This
collection of information is used to
identify imported merchandise entering
the commerce of the United States, to
document the amount of duty and/or tax
paid, and to serve as a record of the
import transaction for the purposes of
required certifications, enforcement
information, and statistical data. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor and
an individual is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB control number.
This rule does not implicate
recordkeeping requirements; however,
please note that the recordkeeping
requirements for the filing of informal
and formal entries are covered in part
163 of title 19 of the CFR (19 CFR part
163), and are approved under OMB
control number 1651–0076.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in
accordance with 19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)
pertaining to the Secretary of the
Treasury’s authority (or that of his
delegate) to approve regulations related
to certain customs revenue functions.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Parts 10, 123, 128, 141, 143, and
145
Customs duties and inspection,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
19 CFR Parts 24 and 148
Customs duties and inspection,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Taxes.
19 CFR Part 102
Canada, Customs duties and
inspection, Imports, Mexico, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Trade
agreements.
Amendments to the CBP Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, parts 10, 24, 102, 123, 128,
141, 143, 145, and 148 of title 19 of the
CFR (19 CFR parts 10, 24, 102, 123, 128,
141, 143, 145, and 148) are amended as
set forth below.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 10—ARTICLES CONDITIONALLY
FREE, SUBJECT TO A REDUCED
RATE, ETC.
1. The general authority citation for
part 10 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS)), 1321, 1481, 1484,
1498, 1508, 1623, 1624, 3314.
*
§ 10.1
*
*
*
*
[Amended]
2. In § 10.1:
a. Paragraph (a) introductory text is
amended by removing the word ‘‘shall’’
and adding in its place the word
‘‘must’’, and by removing the sum
‘‘$2,000’’ and adding in its place the
sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ b. Paragraph (a)(1) is amended by
revising‘‘19___’’ to read ‘‘20___’’;
■ c. Paragraph (a)(2) introductory text is
amended in the last sentence by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘must’’;
■ d. Paragraph (b) is amended by
removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding
in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ e. Paragraph (e) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ f. Paragraph (f) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each place
that it appears and adding in its place
the word ‘‘must’’;
■ g. Paragraph (g)(1) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ ii. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ the first
time that it appears and adding in its
place the word ‘‘must’’; and
■ iii. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ in the
last sentence and adding in its place the
word ‘‘will’’;
■ h. Paragraph (g)(2) introductory text is
amended by removing the word ‘‘shall’’
and adding in its place the word
‘‘must’’, and by removing the word
‘‘Customs’’ and adding in its place the
term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ i. Paragraph (g)(3) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’, and
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ j. Paragraph (h)(1) introductory text is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Customs’’ each place that it appears
and adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’,
and removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the word ‘‘must’’;
■ k. Paragraph (h)(2) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘will’’, and by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■
■
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 235 / Thursday, December 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
l. Paragraph (h)(3) introductory text is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Customs’’ each place that it appears
and adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’,
and removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘must’’;
■ m. Paragraph (h)(4) introductory text
is amended by removing the word
‘‘shall’’ and adding in its place the word
‘‘must’’;
■ n. Paragraph (h)(5) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’, and
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ o. Paragraph (i) is amended by
removing in the first sentence the word
‘‘Customs’’ the first two times it appears
and adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’,
and by removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the word ‘‘must’’; and
■ p. Paragraph (j)(2) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the term ‘‘CBP’’, and by removing
the word ‘‘shall’’ each place that it
appears and adding in its place the
word ‘‘must’’.
■
PART 24—CUSTOMS AND FINANCIAL
ACCOUNTING PROCEDURE
3. The general authority citations for
part 24 is revised and the specific
authority citation for § 24.23 continues
to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58a–58c,
66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1505,
1520, 1624; 26 U.S.C. 4461, 4462; 31 U.S.C.
3717, 9701; Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135
(6 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).
*
*
*
*
*
Section 24.23 also issued under 19 U.S.C.
3332;
*
*
§ 24.23
*
*
*
[Amended]
4. In § 24.23:
a. Paragraph (a)(4) introductory text is
amended by removing the word ‘‘shall’’
and adding in its place the word
‘‘must’’;
■ b. Paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A) is amended
by removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and
adding in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
and by removing the number ‘‘0.21’’
each place it appears and adding in its
place the number ‘‘0.3464’’;
■ c. Paragraph (b)(1)(i)(B) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each place
that it appears and adding in its place
the word ‘‘must’’;
■ d. Paragraph (b)(1)(ii) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each place
that it appears and adding in its place
the word ‘‘will’’;
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Dec 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
e. Paragraph (b)(3) is amended by
removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding
in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ f. Paragraph (b)(4) introductory text is
amended by removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’
and adding in its place the sum
‘‘$2,500’’;
■ g. Paragraph (c)(1) introductory text is
amended by removing the word ‘‘shall’’
and adding in its place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ h. Paragraphs (c)(2)(i) and (ii) are
amended by removing the word ‘‘shall’’
and adding in its place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ i. Paragraph (c)(3) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each place
that it appears and adding in its place
the word ‘‘will’’;
■ j. Paragraph (c)(4) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ k. Paragraph (c)(5) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ ii. Removing the word ‘‘Custons’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘Customs’’;
■ l. Paragraph (d)(1) introductory text is
amended by:
■ i. Removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’; and
■ ii. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ m. Paragraph (d)(2) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ in the
first sentence and adding in its place the
word ‘‘must’’;
■ ii. Removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’; and
■ iii. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ in the
last sentence and adding in its place the
word ‘‘will’’;
■ n. Paragraph (e)(1) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’, in its
heading and in its text, each place that
it appears and adding in its place the
word ‘‘customs’’, and by removing the
word ‘‘shall’’ each place that it appears
and adding in its place the word ‘‘will’’;
and
■ o. Paragraph (e)(2) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘will’’, and by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘customs’’.
■
PART 102—RULES OF ORIGIN
5. The general authority citation for
part 102 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), 1624, 3314, 3592.
*
*
§ 102.24
*
*
*
6. Section 102.24 is amended by
removing paragraph (a), the paragraph
designation ‘‘(b)’’, and the paragraph (b)
subject heading and wrapping into one
paragraph.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 123—CBP RELATIONS WITH
CANADA AND MEXICO
7. The general authority citation for
part 123 and the specific authority
citations for § 123.4 continue to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS)), 1431, 1433, 1436,
1448, 1624, 2071 note.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 123.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C.
1484, 1498;
*
*
§ 123.4
*
*
*
[Amended]
8. In § 123.4:
a. The introductory text is amended
by removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘must’’,
and by removing the word ‘‘Customs’’
and adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ b. Paragraph (a) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ c. Paragraph (b) is amended by
removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding
in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’, and
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ d. Paragraph (c) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’; and
■ e. Paragraph (d) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’, and
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘must’’.
■
■
§ 123.92
[Amended]
9. In § 123.92:
a. Paragraph (b)(2)(i) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘Customs Form
(CF)’’ and adding in its place the term
‘‘CBP Form’’;
■ b. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii) is amended by
removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding
in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’, and by
removing the term ‘‘CF’’ and adding in
its place the words ‘‘CBP Form’’;
■ c. Paragraph (b)(2)(iii) is amended by
removing the term ‘‘CF’’ and adding in
its place the words ‘‘CBP Form’’; and
■ d. Paragraph (c)(2) is amended by
removing the term ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘customs’’.
■
■
PART 128—EXPRESS
CONSIGNMENTS
[Amended]
■
72719
10. The general authority citation for
part 128 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 58c, 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), 1321, 1484, 1498, 1551, 1555,
1556, 1565, 1624.
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
72720
§ 128.24
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 235 / Thursday, December 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
[Amended]
iii. Removing the words ‘‘subheadings
from Sections VII, VIII, XI, and XII; or
in Chapter 94 and’’;
■ d. Paragraphs (f) and (g) are amended
by removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and
adding in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ e. Paragraph (j) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ 16. Section 143.22 is revised to read
as follows:
■
11. In § 128.24:
a. Paragraph (a) is amended by
removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ each place
that it appears and adding in its place
the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ b. Paragraph (b) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’, and
by removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘must’’;
■ c. Paragraph (c) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the term ‘‘CBP’’, and by removing
the word ‘‘shall’’ each place that it
appears and adding in its place the
word ‘‘must’’;
■ d. Paragraph (d) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’; and
■ e. Paragraph (e) introductory text is
amended by removing the word ‘‘shall’’
and adding in its place the word ‘‘will’’.
■
■
PART 141—ENTRY OF MERCHANDISE
§ 143.22
Formal entry may be required.
The port director may require a formal
consumption or appraisement entry for
any merchandise if deemed necessary
for import admissibility enforcement
purposes; revenue protection; or the
efficient conduct of customs business.
Individual shipments for the same
consignee, when such shipments are
valued at $2,500 or less, may be
consolidated on one such entry.
§ 143.23
[Amended]
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1321, 1414, 1481,
1484, 1498, 1624, 1641.
17. In § 143.23:
a. The introductory text is amended
by removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘must’’,
and by removing the word ‘‘Customs’’
each time it appears and adding in its
place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ b. Paragraphs (b) and (c) are amended
by removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ c. Paragraph (d) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and
adding in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ ii. Removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’; and
■ iii. Removing the words ‘‘Sections VII,
VIII, XI, and XII; Chapter 94; and’’;
■ d. Paragraph (e) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘can’’ and adding in
its place the word ‘‘may’’;
■ e. Paragraphs (f), (g), (h)(1), and (h)(2)
introductory text are amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ each
time it appears and adding in its place
the term ‘‘CBP’’; and
■ f. Paragraph (i) is amended by
removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding
in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’.
*
§ 143.26
12. The general authority citation for
part 141 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1448, 1484, 1498,
1624.
*
*
§ 141.82
*
*
*
[Amended]
13. In § 141.82:
a. Paragraphs (b) and (c) are amended
by removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the word ‘‘must’’; and
■ b. Paragraph (d) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and
adding in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ ii. Removing the words ‘‘Sections VII,
VIII, XI, and XII; Chapter 94; and’’; and
■ iii. Adding the symbol ’’)’’ after the
word ‘‘States’’.
■
■
PART 143—SPECIAL ENTRY
PROCEDURES
14. The general authority citation for
part 143 is revised to read as follows:
■
*
§ 143.21
*
*
*
[Amended]
15. In § 143.21:
a. Paragraphs (a) and (b) are amended
by removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and
adding in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ b. Paragraph (a) is further amended by
removing the words ‘‘Sections VII, VIII,
XI, and XII; Chapter 94 and’’;
■ c. Paragraph (c) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and
adding in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ ii. Removing the citation ‘‘§ 141.51’’
and adding in its place the citation
‘‘§ 141.52’’; and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
■
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Dec 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
■
■
[Amended]
18. In § 143.26:
a. Paragraph (a) is amended by
removing, in its heading and in its text,
the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ each place that it
appears and adding in its place the sum
‘‘$2,500’’, and by removing the word
‘‘Customs’’ and adding in its place the
word ‘‘customs’’; and
■ b. Paragraph (b) is amended by
removing the space between
‘‘appropriatel’’ and ‘‘y’’ to read
‘‘appropriately’’, and by removing the
word ‘‘Customs’’ and adding in its place
the word ‘‘customs’’.
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 145—MAIL IMPORTATIONS
19. The general authority citation for
part 145 and the specific authority
citations for §§ 145.4, 145.12, 145.31,
145.35, 145.41 continue to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Notice 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States), 1624.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 145.4 also issued under 18 U.S.C.
545, 19 U.S.C. 1618;
*
*
*
*
*
Section 145.12 also issued under 19 U.S.C.
1315, 1484, 1498;
*
*
*
*
*
Section 145.31 also issued under 19 U.S.C.
1321;
Section 145.35 through 145.38, 145.41, also
issued under 19 U.S.C. 1498;
*
*
§ 145.4
*
*
*
[Amended]
20. In § 145.4:
a. Paragraph (a) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ the first
time it appears and adding in its place
the term ‘‘CBP’’, and by removing the
word ‘‘Customs’’ the second time it
appears and adding in its place the
word ‘‘customs’’; and
■ b. Paragraph (c) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and
adding in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ ii. Removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’; and
■ iii. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘must’’.
■
■
§ 145.12
[Amended]
21. In § 145.12:
a. Paragraph (a)(2) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘will’’, and by
removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding
in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ b. Paragraph (a)(3) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ ii. Removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ the
first time that it appears and adding in
its place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ iii. Removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ the
second time that it appears and adding
in its place the word ‘‘customs’’; and
■ iv. Removing the words ‘‘shall not’’
and adding in its place the word
‘‘cannot’’;
■ c. Paragraph (a)(4) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ in the
first and second sentence and adding in
its place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ ii. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ in the
last sentence and adding in its place the
word ‘‘must’’; and
■ iii. Removing the word ‘‘Customs’’
and adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’,
■
■
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 235 / Thursday, December 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
and adding the word, ‘‘customs’’ before
the word, ‘‘station’’;
■ d. Paragraph (b)(1) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ ii. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ iii. Removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and
adding in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
and
■ iv. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and
adding in its place the word ‘‘will’’;
■ e. Paragraph (b)(2) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘will’’, and by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ and
adding in its place the term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ f. Paragraph (c) is amended by:
■ i. Removing, in its heading and in its
text, the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding in its
place the sum $2,500’’;
■ ii. Removing the word ‘‘Customs’’
each place that it appears in the first
sentence and adding in its place the
term ‘‘CBP’’;
■ iii. Removing the words ‘‘Customs
treatment’’ in the third sentence and
adding in its place the words ‘‘customs
treatment’’;
■ iv. Removing the words ‘‘Customs
office’’ and adding in its place the
words ‘‘CBP office’’; and
■ v. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the term ‘‘will’’;
■ g. Paragraph (e)(1) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ in each
place that it appears and adding in its
place the term ‘‘CBP’’, and by removing
the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding in its place
the word ‘‘will’’; and
■ h. Paragraph (e)(2) is amended by:
■ i. Removing the words ‘‘Customs
Form’’ each place that it appears, in its
heading and its text, and adding in its
place the words ‘‘CBP Form’’;
■ ii. Removing the words ‘‘Customs
officer’’ and adding in its place the
words ‘‘CBP officer’’;
■ iii. Removing the words ‘‘Customs
purposes’’ and adding in its place the
words ‘‘customs purposes’’;
■ iv. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ in the
first sentence and adding in its place the
word ‘‘must’’; and
■ v. Removing the word ‘‘shall’’ in the
second sentence and adding in its place
the word ‘‘will’’.
§ 145.31
[Amended]
22. Section 145.31 is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘will’’.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
■
§ 145.35
23. Section 145.35 is amended by
removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding
in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’.
■
14:03 Dec 05, 2012
[Amended]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
24. Section 145.41 is amended by
removing the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding
in its place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’.
Internal Revenue Service
PART 148—PERSONAL
DECLARATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS
[TD 9602]
■
25. The general authority citation for
part 148 is revised and the specific
authority citations for § 148.51 and
148.64 continue to read as follows:
Fees on Health Insurance Policies and
Self-Insured Plans for the PatientCentered Outcomes Research Trust
Fund
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1496, 1498, 1624.
The provisions of this part, except for subpart
C, are also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1202
(General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States).
AGENCY:
■
*
*
*
*
*
Sections 148.43, 148.51, 148.63, 148.64,
148.74 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1321;
*
*
§ 148.23
*
*
*
[Amended]
26. In § 148.23:
a. Paragraph (c)(1) is amended by
removing, in its heading and in its text,
the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding in its
place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’;
■ b. Paragraph (c)(1) is further amended
by removing, in the text, the words
‘‘Sections VII, VIII, XI, and XII; Chapter
94; and’’;
■ c. Paragraph (c)(2) is amended by
removing, in its heading and in its text,
the sum ‘‘$2,000’’ and adding in its
place the sum ‘‘$2,500’’; and
■ d. Paragraph (c)(2) is further amended
by removing the words ‘‘Sections VII,
VIII, XI, and XII; Chapter 94; and’’.
■
■
§ 148.54
[Amended]
27. In § 148.54
■ a. Paragraph (b) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ and adding
in its place the word ‘‘must’’, and by
removing the sum ‘‘$250’’ and adding in
its place the sum‘‘$2,500’’; and
■ b. Paragraph (c) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘shall’’ each place
that it appears and adding in its place
the word ‘‘will’’.
■
David V. Aguilar,
Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
Approved: November 28, 2012.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2012–29193 Filed 12–5–12; 8:45 am]
[Amended]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
§ 145.41
Jkt 229001
72721
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26 CFR Parts 40, 46, and 602
RIN 1545–BK59
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
This document contains final
regulations that implement and provide
guidance on the fees imposed by the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act on issuers of certain health
insurance policies and plan sponsors of
certain self-insured health plans to fund
the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Trust Fund. These final regulations
affect the issuers and plan sponsors that
are directed to pay those fees.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective December 6, 2012.
Applicability Dates: These regulations
apply to policy and plan years ending
on or after October 1, 2012, and before
October 1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R.
Lisa Mojiri-Azad at (202) 622–6080
(regarding self-insured health
arrangements) or Rebecca L. Baxter at
(202) 622–3970 (regarding health
insurance policies).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
contained in these final regulations has
been reviewed and approved by the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)) under control number 1545–
2238. The collections of information in
these final regulations are in § 46.4375–
1(c)(2)(iv) (use of the snapshot method
to calculate the fee under section 4375);
§ 46.4375–1(c)(2)(v) (use of the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC) Supplemental Health Care
Exhibit to calculate the fee under
section 4375); § 46.4375–1(c)(2)(vi) (use
of certain state forms to calculate the fee
under section 4375); § 46.4376–
1(b)(2)(G) (identification or designation
of a plan sponsor under the governing
plan document for certain applicable
self-insured health plans); § 46.4376–
1(c)(2)(iv) (use of snapshot method to
calculate the fee under section 4376);
and § 46.4376–1(c)(2)(v) (use of the
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 235 (Thursday, December 6, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72715-72721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29193]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Parts 10, 24, 102, 123, 128, 141, 143, 145, and 148
[USCBP-2011-0042, CBP Dec. 12-19]
RIN 1515-AD69
Informal Entry Limit and Removal of a Formal Entry Requirement
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Currently, for any merchandise valued over $2,000, CBP
requires importers to provide a surety bond, complete CBP form 7501,
and pay a minimum of $25 in Merchandise Processing Fees (MPF). The
final rule increases the limit, from $2,000 to $2,500, for which
merchandise may qualify for an ``informal entry'', thereby eliminating
the need for a surety bond, expediting the customs clearance process,
and reducing the required MPF amount to $2 (assuming the entries are
filed electronically). CBP is increasing the informal entry limit to
mitigate the effects of inflation and in addition, to meet a commitment
of the Beyond the Border Initiative between the United States and
Canada, to increase and harmonize the value thresholds to $2,500 for
expedited customs clearance from the current levels of $2,000 for the
United States and $1,600 for Canada.
This document also removes the language requiring formal entry for
certain articles that were formerly subject to absolute quotas under
the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing because CBP no longer needs to
require formal entries for these articles. This document also makes a
technical conforming amendment to reflect a recent statutory amendment
that increased the ad valorem Merchandise Processing Fee (MPF) from
0.21 percent to 0.3464 percent. Finally, this document makes non-
substantive editorial and nomenclature changes.
[[Page 72716]]
DATES: Effective January 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elena Ryan, Acting Director, Trade
Facilitation and Administration Division, Office of International
Trade, Customs and Border Protection, 202-863-6578.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 28, 2011, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'')
published a proposed rule in the Federal Register (76 FR 66875)
proposing to amend title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (``19
CFR'') to increase the informal entry limit from $2,000 to $2,500, the
maximum statutory limit, in response to inflation and thereby to reduce
the burden on importers and other entry filers. We note that an
increase of the informal entry limit is also consistent with one of the
goals of the Beyond the Border Initiative, which began on February 4,
2011, and encourages bilateral cooperation between the United States
and Canada. Through the Beyond the Border Initiative, the United States
and Canada have agreed to increase and harmonize the value thresholds
to $2,500 for expedited customs clearance from the current levels of
$2,000 for the United States and $1,600 for Canada. (For further
information on the Beyond the Border Action Plan, see https://www.dhs.gov/files/publications/beyond-the-border.shtm.) CBP also
proposed to remove the language requiring formal entry for certain
articles, because with the elimination of absolute quotas under the
Agreement on Textiles and Clothing, CBP no longer needs to require
formal entries for these articles. For further details on the proposal,
please reference the published proposed rule.
CBP solicited public comments on the proposed rule.
Technical Correction
This document also makes a technical correction to conform the
regulations to reflect the statutory amendment to section 13031(a)(9)
of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19
U.S.C. 58c(a)(9)) by section 2 of the Trade Adjustment Assistance
Extension Act of 2011 that increased the ad valorem Merchandise
Processing Fee (MPF) of 0.21 percent to 0.3464 percent. See Pub. L.
112-40, 125 Stat. 401 (October 23, 2011). The increased MPF applies to
imported merchandise entered on or after October 1, 2011 until June 30,
2014.
Discussion of Comments
Eighteen commenters responded to the solicitation of public
comments in the proposed rule. These comments can be found at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;dct=PS;rpp=25;po=0;D=USCBP-2011-
0042. The vast majority of the commenters expressed support for
increasing the informal entry limit and/or removing the formal entry
list. CBP's responses to the comments are set forth below.
Comment: Fifteen commenters expressed general agreement with the
proposal to increase the informal entry limit to $2,500. Fourteen of
these fifteen commenters agreed with the proposal to remove the formal
entry requirement for certain articles and one commenter did not
comment on the proposal concerning the formal entry requirement.
CBP Response: CBP concurs with proceeding to increase the informal
entry amount to its statutory limit and to remove the formal entry
requirement for certain articles that were previously subject to
absolute quotas under the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing.
Comment: One commenter questioned whether filing an informal entry
is less time consuming and burdensome than filing a formal entry. The
commenter stated that an importer must use due diligence for both
formal and informal entries.
CBP Response: CBP notes that importers filing by paper are required
to complete more data elements in the formal entry paper form than in
the informal entry form. For example, importers filing a formal entry
paper form are required to provide the location of the goods, whereas
importers filing an informal entry paper form are not required to
provide this data element. Therefore, for paper filers, the informal
entry is less time consuming. The bulk of affected filings are
electronic, however, and in the electronic format filers provide the
same data for both formal and informal entries. CBP agrees that the
importer must use due diligence for filing both informal and formal
entries.
Comment: Two commenters indicated that adjusting the informal entry
limit to reflect inflation from 1998 to 2011 would raise the amount to
approximately $2,800 rather than the proposed $2,500. One commenter
suggested increasing the informal entry limit to $3,000.
CBP Response: Although CBP agrees that inflation would increase the
informal entry limit from $2,000 to approximately $2,800, CBP is bound
by the statutory limit of $2,500.
Comment: One commenter asked whether a study has been conducted to
determine how many entries between the value of $2,000 and $2,500 would
have been filed in the past years if the informal entry limit were
$2,500.
CBP Response: As set forth in this document (see the ``Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563'' section), CBP estimates that in fiscal year
2011 (the latest year of available data), there were approximately
852,000 formal entries between the value of $2,000 and $2,500.
Approximately 558,000 of those entries would have been affected by this
rule because they were required to pay MPFs.
Comment: One commenter suggested that CBP postpone the effective
date of the rule until 2015 because promulgation of the rule would
result in a net loss of $11 million to the U.S. Treasury. Two other
commenters stated that the timing of the policy seemed inconsistent
with the recent Congressional decision to increase the ad valorem MPFs
by 60 percent. These two commenters noted that CBP would lose revenue
from MPFs by increasing the informal entry limit and one of these
commenters additionally noted that removing the formal entry
requirement for textile and apparel entries would reduce revenue
further because of the reduced collection of MPFs.
CBP Response: CBP notes that the MPF is set by Congress and the
level of the MPF is beyond the scope of this rule. The reduction in MPF
for the shipments which are affected by this rule should facilitate
trade.
Comment: Three commenters stated that the analysis of the impact on
small entities was too conservative and did not address the savings
that would be achieved by small and medium businesses. Four commenters
cited a June 2011 study conducted by the Peterson Institute for
International Economics (``Peterson study'') in support of this
statement and in support of its statement that raising the informal
entry level would result in a substantial savings to CBP, the United
States Postal Service, the express industry, and U.S. consumers.
CBP Response: CBP has reviewed the Peterson study, and while we
agree that this final rule could result in meaningful benefits for the
public, the estimates in the study relied on assumptions that CBP could
not verify or support. Given the limitations in the data available for
this analysis, CBP cannot ascertain with any degree of certainty the
specific monetary impacts to businesses based on size.
Comment: Two commenters questioned CBP's ability to conduct post-
entry audit on informal entries. One commenter noted that the security
of the cargo and the accuracy of the cargo's description is at risk
because
[[Page 72717]]
there is no review of incoming air cargo prior to lading on board an
aircraft. The other commenter stated that a similar issue would arise
in the case of antidumping and countervailing duties entries that were
not properly prepared.
CBP Response: CBP has the ability to conduct post-entry audits on
informal entries because CBP has regulatory auditors who conduct either
scheduled or random audits on importers' liquidated entries to
determine compliance with applicable U.S. laws and regulations.
Moreover, CBP notes that formal entries are required for all
antidumping and countervailing duties entries. The commenter's concern
regarding the security of the cargo prior to lading is not impacted by
raising the informal entry limit because CBP screens all manifested
merchandise on board the carrier without regard to its value.
Comment: One commenter asserted that CBP inspectors universally
seem to agree that a large percentage of import violations occur when
importers inaccurately claim that their goods are valued less than
$2,000.
CBP Response: Even when entries are informal, CBP reviews for
correctness of the entry and the admissibility of the merchandise to
ensure compliance with applicable U.S. laws and regulations.
Comment: One commenter asked whether Congress will allow resource
deviation from CBP's enforcement efforts to the further development of
the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) system.
CBP Response: The anticipated actions of Congress are beyond the
scope of this rulemaking.
Conclusion
After review of the comments and further consideration, CBP has
decided to adopt the proposed rule that was published in the Federal
Register (76 FR 66875) on October 28, 2011, with the addition of the
conforming technical amendment to the MPF as discussed above.
Additional minor grammatical and editorial changes were made in this
final rule.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory
action'' although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). CBP has prepared the following
analysis to help inform stakeholders of the potential impacts of this
final rule.
CBP requires importers to submit a completed CBP Form 7501 (OMB
Control Number 1651-0022) or its electronic equivalent with each entry
of merchandise for consumption. Merchandise valued over $2,000 requires
a formal entry, which generally includes detailed information regarding
the import transaction as well as commercial documents pertaining to
the transaction. In addition, a surety bond is required, and the
importer may take possession of the merchandise before duties and taxes
are assessed. Currently, merchandise valued below $2,000 may be entered
informally without a bond; and duties and taxes are assessed
immediately. However, based on his/her discretion, a port director, may
require a formal entry to be filed. This final rule increases the
ceiling for which merchandise may qualify for an informal entry from
$2,000 to $2,500.
Unless exempt under a free trade agreement and in addition to any
duty or tax owed, merchandise requiring a formal entry was subject to a
0.21 percent ad valorem MPF, which may be no greater than $485 and no
less than $25. Since the publication of the NPRM, the ad valorem rate
has increased from 0.21 percent to 0.3464 percent (starting on October
1, 2011). Any merchandise currently requiring a formal entry with a
value of $2,000 to $2,500 is subject to the minimum $25 MPF. Entries
that are now considered informal entries as a result of the change in
the threshold would now be subject to only a $2 MPF (assuming they are
filed electronically, see 19 CFR 24.23(b)(2)(i)). In the NPRM, CBP
stated that in fiscal year (FY) 2009, 476,081 formal entries, valued
between $2,000 and $2,500, were processed which were not subject to
free trade agreements and were subject to the $25 MPF. Since the
publication of the NPRM, these formal entries have increased from
476,081 entries in FY 2009 to 558,259 entries for FY 2011.
Consequently, raising the informal entry limited to $2,500 would result
in a loss of approximately $14 million in revenues if the $25 MPF were
not collected for these entries in FY 2011 (558,259 x $25 = $14.0
million). Revenues would now be approximately $1 million (558,259 x $2
= $1.1 million), thus the net loss in fees collected would be
approximately $13 million ($14 million - $1 million). We note that the
estimated loss in net fees collected has increased from approximately
$11 million estimated in the NPRM to $13 million estimated here for the
final rule.
Because the informal entry limit has not kept pace with inflation,
some importers may have paid a higher MPF than would have been required
if the informal entry limit had kept pace with inflation. Due to data
limitations CBP is unable to determine the aggregate savings any
particular firm will realize if this regulation is finalized. CBP
estimates importers as a whole, however, will realize a benefit of
approximately $13 million when this regulation is finalized. CBP notes
that this benefit to the trade represents a transfer from the
government.
Additionally, this increase in the informal entry level meets the
agreed upon value of $2,500 for the Beyond the Border Initiative.
Harmonizing the informal entry value thresholds of the United States
and Canada eliminates one difference in the customs clearance process.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This section examines the impact of the rule on small entities as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et. seq.), as
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act
of 1996. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field
that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act); a small
not-for-profit organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction
(locality with fewer than 50,000 people).
CBP has considered the impact of this rule on small entities. To
the extent that this rule affects small entities, these entities would
experience a small cost savings on a per-transaction basis. The total
cost savings per entity would be based on its annual transaction
levels. CBP does not believe such a small cost savings would rise to
the level of a ``significant economic impact.'' During the comment
period for the NPRM, CBP did not receive any comments that would amend
this conclusion. Thus, CBP certifies that this rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
[[Page 72718]]
private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and it will
not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions are necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Executive Order 13132 requires CBP to develop a process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
Policies that have federalism implications are defined in the Executive
Order to include rules that have ``substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.'' CBP has analyzed the rule in accordance
with the principles and criteria in the Executive Order and has
determined that it does not have federalism implications or a
substantial direct effect on the States. The rule increases the
informal entry limit from $2,000 to $2,500 and removes the formal entry
list. States do not conduct activities with which this rule would
interfere. For this reason, this rule would not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988. That Executive Order requires
agencies to conduct reviews, before proposing legislation or
promulgating regulations, to determine the impact of those proposals on
civil justice and potential issues for litigation. The Order requires
that agencies make reasonable efforts to ensure that a regulation
clearly identifies preemptive effects, effects on existing Federal laws
and regulations, any retroactive effects of the proposal, and other
matters. CBP has determined that this regulation meets the requirements
of Executive Order 12988 because it does not involve retroactive
effects, preemptive effects, or other matters addressed in the Order.
National Environmental Policy Act
Increasing the informal entry limit, removing the formal entry
list, and amending the regulations to reflect a recent statutory
amendment that increased the ad valorem Merchandise Processing Fee
(MPF) from 0.21 percent to 0.3464 percent, is non-invasive and there is
no potential environmental impact of any kind. Therefore, an
environmental statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information on the Entry Summary and Informal
Entry has been previously reviewed and approved by OMB in accordance
with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507)
under control number 1651-0022. This collection of information is used
to identify imported merchandise entering the commerce of the United
States, to document the amount of duty and/or tax paid, and to serve as
a record of the import transaction for the purposes of required
certifications, enforcement information, and statistical data. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor and an individual is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB
control number. This rule does not implicate recordkeeping
requirements; however, please note that the recordkeeping requirements
for the filing of informal and formal entries are covered in part 163
of title 19 of the CFR (19 CFR part 163), and are approved under OMB
control number 1651-0076.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in accordance with 19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)
pertaining to the Secretary of the Treasury's authority (or that of his
delegate) to approve regulations related to certain customs revenue
functions.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Parts 10, 123, 128, 141, 143, and 145
Customs duties and inspection, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
19 CFR Parts 24 and 148
Customs duties and inspection, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Taxes.
19 CFR Part 102
Canada, Customs duties and inspection, Imports, Mexico, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Trade agreements.
Amendments to the CBP Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, parts 10, 24, 102, 123,
128, 141, 143, 145, and 148 of title 19 of the CFR (19 CFR parts 10,
24, 102, 123, 128, 141, 143, 145, and 148) are amended as set forth
below.
PART 10--ARTICLES CONDITIONALLY FREE, SUBJECT TO A REDUCED RATE,
ETC.
0
1. The general authority citation for part 10 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)), 1321, 1481, 1484,
1498, 1508, 1623, 1624, 3314.
* * * * *
Sec. 10.1 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 10.1:
0
a. Paragraph (a) introductory text is amended by removing the word
``shall'' and adding in its place the word ``must'', and by removing
the sum ``$2,000'' and adding in its place the sum ``$2,500'';
0
b. Paragraph (a)(1) is amended by revising``19------'' to read ``20----
--'';
0
c. Paragraph (a)(2) introductory text is amended in the last sentence
by removing the word ``shall'' and adding in its place the word
``must'';
0
d. Paragraph (b) is amended by removing the sum ``$2,000'' and adding
in its place the sum ``$2,500'';
0
e. Paragraph (e) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and adding
in its place the word ``will'';
0
f. Paragraph (f) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' each place
that it appears and adding in its place the word ``must'';
0
g. Paragraph (g)(1) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the word ``Customs'' each place that it appears and adding
in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
ii. Removing the word ``shall'' the first time that it appears and
adding in its place the word ``must''; and
0
iii. Removing the word ``shall'' in the last sentence and adding in its
place the word ``will'';
0
h. Paragraph (g)(2) introductory text is amended by removing the word
``shall'' and adding in its place the word ``must'', and by removing
the word ``Customs'' and adding in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
i. Paragraph (g)(3) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' and
adding in its place the term ``CBP'', and removing the word ``shall''
and adding in its place the word ``will'';
0
j. Paragraph (h)(1) introductory text is amended by removing the word
``Customs'' each place that it appears and adding in its place the term
``CBP'', and removing the word ``shall'' each place that it appears and
adding in its place the word ``must'';
0
k. Paragraph (h)(2) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding in its place the word ``will'', and by removing the word
``Customs'' and adding in its place the term ``CBP'';
[[Page 72719]]
0
l. Paragraph (h)(3) introductory text is amended by removing the word
``Customs'' each place that it appears and adding in its place the term
``CBP'', and removing the word ``shall'' and adding in its place the
word ``must'';
0
m. Paragraph (h)(4) introductory text is amended by removing the word
``shall'' and adding in its place the word ``must'';
0
n. Paragraph (h)(5) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' and
adding in its place the term ``CBP'', and removing the word ``shall''
and adding in its place the word ``will'';
0
o. Paragraph (i) is amended by removing in the first sentence the word
``Customs'' the first two times it appears and adding in its place the
term ``CBP'', and by removing the word ``shall'' each place that it
appears and adding in its place the word ``must''; and
0
p. Paragraph (j)(2) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' each
place that it appears and adding in its place the term ``CBP'', and by
removing the word ``shall'' each place that it appears and adding in
its place the word ``must''.
PART 24--CUSTOMS AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING PROCEDURE
0
3. The general authority citations for part 24 is revised and the
specific authority citation for Sec. 24.23 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58a-58c, 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1505,
1520, 1624; 26 U.S.C. 4461, 4462; 31 U.S.C. 3717, 9701; Pub. L. 107-
296, 116 Stat. 2135 (6 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).
* * * * *
Section 24.23 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 3332;
* * * * *
Sec. 24.23 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 24.23:
0
a. Paragraph (a)(4) introductory text is amended by removing the word
``shall'' and adding in its place the word ``must'';
0
b. Paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A) is amended by removing the sum ``$2,000'' and
adding in its place the sum ``$2,500''; and by removing the number
``0.21'' each place it appears and adding in its place the number
``0.3464'';
0
c. Paragraph (b)(1)(i)(B) is amended by removing the word ``shall''
each place that it appears and adding in its place the word ``must'';
0
d. Paragraph (b)(1)(ii) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' each
place that it appears and adding in its place the word ``will'';
0
e. Paragraph (b)(3) is amended by removing the sum ``$2,000'' and
adding in its place the sum ``$2,500'';
0
f. Paragraph (b)(4) introductory text is amended by removing the sum
``$2,000'' and adding in its place the sum ``$2,500'';
0
g. Paragraph (c)(1) introductory text is amended by removing the word
``shall'' and adding in its place the word ``will'';
0
h. Paragraphs (c)(2)(i) and (ii) are amended by removing the word
``shall'' and adding in its place the word ``will'';
0
i. Paragraph (c)(3) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' each
place that it appears and adding in its place the word ``will'';
0
j. Paragraph (c)(4) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding in its place the word ``will'';
0
k. Paragraph (c)(5) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the word ``shall'' and adding in its place the word
``will'';
0
ii. Removing the word ``Custons'' and adding in its place the word
``Customs'';
0
l. Paragraph (d)(1) introductory text is amended by:
0
i. Removing the word ``Customs'' and adding in its place the term
``CBP''; and
0
ii. Removing the word ``shall'' and adding in its place the word
``will'';
0
m. Paragraph (d)(2) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the word ``shall'' in the first sentence and adding in its
place the word ``must'';
0
ii. Removing the word ``Customs'' and adding in its place the term
``CBP''; and
0
iii. Removing the word ``shall'' in the last sentence and adding in its
place the word ``will'';
0
n. Paragraph (e)(1) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'', in its
heading and in its text, each place that it appears and adding in its
place the word ``customs'', and by removing the word ``shall'' each
place that it appears and adding in its place the word ``will''; and
0
o. Paragraph (e)(2) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding in its place the word ``will'', and by removing the word
``Customs'' and adding in its place the word ``customs''.
PART 102--RULES OF ORIGIN
0
5. The general authority citation for part 102 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1624, 3314, 3592.
* * * * *
Sec. 102.24 [Amended]
0
6. Section 102.24 is amended by removing paragraph (a), the paragraph
designation ``(b)'', and the paragraph (b) subject heading and wrapping
into one paragraph.
* * * * *
PART 123--CBP RELATIONS WITH CANADA AND MEXICO
0
7. The general authority citation for part 123 and the specific
authority citations for Sec. 123.4 continue to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)), 1431, 1433, 1436,
1448, 1624, 2071 note.
* * * * *
Section 123.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1484, 1498;
* * * * *
Sec. 123.4 [Amended]
0
8. In Sec. 123.4:
0
a. The introductory text is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding in its place the word ``must'', and by removing the word
``Customs'' and adding in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
b. Paragraph (a) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' and adding
in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
c. Paragraph (b) is amended by removing the sum ``$2,000'' and adding
in its place the sum ``$2,500'', and removing the word ``Customs'' each
place that it appears and adding in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
d. Paragraph (c) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' and adding
in its place the term ``CBP''; and
0
e. Paragraph (d) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' and adding
in its place the term ``CBP'', and removing the word ``shall'' and
adding in its place the word ``must''.
Sec. 123.92 [Amended]
0
9. In Sec. 123.92:
0
a. Paragraph (b)(2)(i) is amended by removing the words ``Customs Form
(CF)'' and adding in its place the term ``CBP Form'';
0
b. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii) is amended by removing the sum ``$2,000'' and
adding in its place the sum ``$2,500'', and by removing the term ``CF''
and adding in its place the words ``CBP Form'';
0
c. Paragraph (b)(2)(iii) is amended by removing the term ``CF'' and
adding in its place the words ``CBP Form''; and
0
d. Paragraph (c)(2) is amended by removing the term ``Customs'' and
adding in its place the word ``customs''.
PART 128--EXPRESS CONSIGNMENTS
0
10. The general authority citation for part 128 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 58c, 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i),
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1321, 1484, 1498,
1551, 1555, 1556, 1565, 1624.
[[Page 72720]]
Sec. 128.24 [Amended]
0
11. In Sec. 128.24:
0
a. Paragraph (a) is amended by removing the sum ``$2,000'' each place
that it appears and adding in its place the sum ``$2,500'';
0
b. Paragraph (b) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' and adding
in its place the term ``CBP'', and by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding in its place the word ``must'';
0
c. Paragraph (c) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' each place
that it appears and adding in its place the term ``CBP'', and by
removing the word ``shall'' each place that it appears and adding in
its place the word ``must'';
0
d. Paragraph (d) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' and adding
in its place the term ``CBP''; and
0
e. Paragraph (e) introductory text is amended by removing the word
``shall'' and adding in its place the word ``will''.
PART 141--ENTRY OF MERCHANDISE
0
12. The general authority citation for part 141 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1448, 1484, 1498, 1624.
* * * * *
Sec. 141.82 [Amended]
0
13. In Sec. 141.82:
0
a. Paragraphs (b) and (c) are amended by removing the word ``shall''
each place that it appears and adding in its place the word ``must'';
and
0
b. Paragraph (d) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the sum ``$2,000'' and adding in its place the sum
``$2,500'';
0
ii. Removing the words ``Sections VII, VIII, XI, and XII; Chapter 94;
and''; and
0
iii. Adding the symbol '')'' after the word ``States''.
PART 143--SPECIAL ENTRY PROCEDURES
0
14. The general authority citation for part 143 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1321, 1414, 1481, 1484, 1498, 1624,
1641.
* * * * *
Sec. 143.21 [Amended]
0
15. In Sec. 143.21:
0
a. Paragraphs (a) and (b) are amended by removing the sum ``$2,000''
and adding in its place the sum ``$2,500'';
0
b. Paragraph (a) is further amended by removing the words ``Sections
VII, VIII, XI, and XII; Chapter 94 and'';
0
c. Paragraph (c) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the sum ``$2,000'' and adding in its place the sum
``$2,500'';
0
ii. Removing the citation ``Sec. 141.51'' and adding in its place the
citation ``Sec. 141.52''; and
0
iii. Removing the words ``subheadings from Sections VII, VIII, XI, and
XII; or in Chapter 94 and'';
0
d. Paragraphs (f) and (g) are amended by removing the sum ``$2,000''
and adding in its place the sum ``$2,500'';
0
e. Paragraph (j) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' and adding
in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
16. Section 143.22 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 143.22 Formal entry may be required.
The port director may require a formal consumption or appraisement
entry for any merchandise if deemed necessary for import admissibility
enforcement purposes; revenue protection; or the efficient conduct of
customs business. Individual shipments for the same consignee, when
such shipments are valued at $2,500 or less, may be consolidated on one
such entry.
Sec. 143.23 [Amended]
0
17. In Sec. 143.23:
0
a. The introductory text is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding in its place the word ``must'', and by removing the word
``Customs'' each time it appears and adding in its place the term
``CBP'';
0
b. Paragraphs (b) and (c) are amended by removing the word ``Customs''
and adding in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
c. Paragraph (d) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the sum ``$2,000'' and adding in its place the sum
``$2,500'';
0
ii. Removing the word ``Customs'' and adding in its place the term
``CBP''; and
0
iii. Removing the words ``Sections VII, VIII, XI, and XII; Chapter 94;
and'';
0
d. Paragraph (e) is amended by removing the word ``can'' and adding in
its place the word ``may'';
0
e. Paragraphs (f), (g), (h)(1), and (h)(2) introductory text are
amended by removing the word ``Customs'' each time it appears and
adding in its place the term ``CBP''; and
0
f. Paragraph (i) is amended by removing the sum ``$2,000'' and adding
in its place the sum ``$2,500''.
Sec. 143.26 [Amended]
0
18. In Sec. 143.26:
0
a. Paragraph (a) is amended by removing, in its heading and in its
text, the sum ``$2,000'' each place that it appears and adding in its
place the sum ``$2,500'', and by removing the word ``Customs'' and
adding in its place the word ``customs''; and
0
b. Paragraph (b) is amended by removing the space between
``appropriatel'' and ``y'' to read ``appropriately'', and by removing
the word ``Customs'' and adding in its place the word ``customs''.
PART 145--MAIL IMPORTATIONS
0
19. The general authority citation for part 145 and the specific
authority citations for Sec. Sec. 145.4, 145.12, 145.31, 145.35,
145.41 continue to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Notice 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1624.
* * * * *
Section 145.4 also issued under 18 U.S.C. 545, 19 U.S.C. 1618;
* * * * *
Section 145.12 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1315, 1484, 1498;
* * * * *
Section 145.31 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1321;
Section 145.35 through 145.38, 145.41, also issued under 19
U.S.C. 1498;
* * * * *
Sec. 145.4 [Amended]
0
20. In Sec. 145.4:
0
a. Paragraph (a) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' the first
time it appears and adding in its place the term ``CBP'', and by
removing the word ``Customs'' the second time it appears and adding in
its place the word ``customs''; and
0
b. Paragraph (c) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the sum ``$2,000'' and adding in its place the sum
``$2,500'';
0
ii. Removing the word ``Customs'' and adding in its place the term
``CBP''; and
0
iii. Removing the word ``shall'' and adding in its place the word
``must''.
Sec. 145.12 [Amended]
0
21. In Sec. 145.12:
0
a. Paragraph (a)(2) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding in its place the word ``will'', and by removing the sum
``$2,000'' and adding in its place the sum ``$2,500'';
0
b. Paragraph (a)(3) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the sum ``$2,000'' each place that it appears and adding in
its place the sum ``$2,500'';
0
ii. Removing the word ``Customs'' the first time that it appears and
adding in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
iii. Removing the word ``Customs'' the second time that it appears and
adding in its place the word ``customs''; and
0
iv. Removing the words ``shall not'' and adding in its place the word
``cannot'';
0
c. Paragraph (a)(4) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the word ``shall'' in the first and second sentence and
adding in its place the word ``will'';
0
ii. Removing the word ``shall'' in the last sentence and adding in its
place the word ``must''; and
0
iii. Removing the word ``Customs'' and adding in its place the term
``CBP'',
[[Page 72721]]
and adding the word, ``customs'' before the word, ``station'';
0
d. Paragraph (b)(1) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the word ``Customs'' each place that it appears and adding
in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
ii. Removing the word ``shall'' each place that it appears and adding
in its place the word ``will'';
0
iii. Removing the sum ``$2,000'' and adding in its place the sum
``$2,500''; and
0
iv. Removing the word ``shall'' and adding in its place the word
``will'';
0
e. Paragraph (b)(2) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and
adding in its place the word ``will'', and by removing the word
``Customs'' and adding in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
f. Paragraph (c) is amended by:
0
i. Removing, in its heading and in its text, the sum ``$2,000'' and
adding in its place the sum $2,500'';
0
ii. Removing the word ``Customs'' each place that it appears in the
first sentence and adding in its place the term ``CBP'';
0
iii. Removing the words ``Customs treatment'' in the third sentence and
adding in its place the words ``customs treatment'';
0
iv. Removing the words ``Customs office'' and adding in its place the
words ``CBP office''; and
0
v. Removing the word ``shall'' each place that it appears and adding in
its place the term ``will'';
0
g. Paragraph (e)(1) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' in each
place that it appears and adding in its place the term ``CBP'', and by
removing the word ``shall'' and adding in its place the word ``will'';
and
0
h. Paragraph (e)(2) is amended by:
0
i. Removing the words ``Customs Form'' each place that it appears, in
its heading and its text, and adding in its place the words ``CBP
Form'';
0
ii. Removing the words ``Customs officer'' and adding in its place the
words ``CBP officer'';
0
iii. Removing the words ``Customs purposes'' and adding in its place
the words ``customs purposes'';
0
iv. Removing the word ``shall'' in the first sentence and adding in its
place the word ``must''; and
0
v. Removing the word ``shall'' in the second sentence and adding in its
place the word ``will''.
Sec. 145.31 [Amended]
0
22. Section 145.31 is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and adding
in its place the word ``will''.
Sec. 145.35 [Amended]
0
23. Section 145.35 is amended by removing the sum ``$2,000'' and adding
in its place the sum ``$2,500''.
Sec. 145.41 [Amended]
0
24. Section 145.41 is amended by removing the sum ``$2,000'' and adding
in its place the sum ``$2,500''.
PART 148--PERSONAL DECLARATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS
0
25. The general authority citation for part 148 is revised and the
specific authority citations for Sec. 148.51 and 148.64 continue to
read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1496, 1498, 1624. The provisions of
this part, except for subpart C, are also issued under 19 U.S.C.
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States).
* * * * *
Sections 148.43, 148.51, 148.63, 148.64, 148.74 also issued
under 19 U.S.C. 1321;
* * * * *
Sec. 148.23 [Amended]
0
26. In Sec. 148.23:
0
a. Paragraph (c)(1) is amended by removing, in its heading and in its
text, the sum ``$2,000'' and adding in its place the sum ``$2,500'';
0
b. Paragraph (c)(1) is further amended by removing, in the text, the
words ``Sections VII, VIII, XI, and XII; Chapter 94; and'';
0
c. Paragraph (c)(2) is amended by removing, in its heading and in its
text, the sum ``$2,000'' and adding in its place the sum ``$2,500'';
and
0
d. Paragraph (c)(2) is further amended by removing the words ``Sections
VII, VIII, XI, and XII; Chapter 94; and''.
Sec. 148.54 [Amended]
0
27. In Sec. 148.54
0
a. Paragraph (b) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' and adding
in its place the word ``must'', and by removing the sum ``$250'' and
adding in its place the sum``$2,500''; and
0
b. Paragraph (c) is amended by removing the word ``shall'' each place
that it appears and adding in its place the word ``will''.
David V. Aguilar,
Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Approved: November 28, 2012.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2012-29193 Filed 12-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P