Animal Drug User Fee Act; Public Meeting; Request for Comments, 72356-72359 [2012-29498]
Download as PDF
72356
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 5, 2012 / Notices
the Tobacco Control Act for achieving
each of the communication goals. The
information collected from the study
will help inform the Agency’s efforts to
implement the mandatory graphic
health warnings required by the
Tobacco Control Act.
The experimental study data will be
collected from participants of an
Internet panel of approximately 43,000
people. Participation in the
experimental study is voluntary.
In the Federal Register of March 27,
2012 (77 FR 18250), FDA published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on its proposed collection of
information. FDA received eight
comments that were not PRA-related
and that were outside the scope of this
collection of information. FDA also
received a comment that asked FDA to
provide more detail about the design of
the proposed consumer research study
to allow for meaningful public
comments. The commenter also
encouraged FDA to provide additional
information for public comment,
including details of the protocol, screen,
questionnaire, and actual graphic
warnings images to be used with study
participants to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected and further the goals of the
PRA to ensure the greatest possible
public benefit from and maximize the
utility of the information. FDA notes in
response to this comment that the study
and copies of the instruments used to
collect this information are described in
detail as part of the overall package
submitted to OMB for review. The study
and copies of the instrument were made
available to the public during the
original information collection period.
They will also be available to the public
at www.reginfo.gov once OMB receives
the package for review.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
No. of
respondents
Portion of study
No. of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average burden
per response
Total hours
Pretest ............................................................................
Screener .........................................................................
Experimental Survey ......................................................
60
15,000
5,400
1
1
1
60
15,000
5,400
0.5 (30 minutes) ..
0.016 (1 minute) ..
0.5 (30 minutes) ..
30
240
2,700
Total ........................................................................
........................
........................
........................
.............................
2,970
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
FDA’s burden estimate is based on
prior experience with Internet panel
experiments similar to the study
proposed here. Sixty panel members
will take part in a pretest of the study,
estimated to last 30 minutes (0.5 hours),
for a total of 30 hours. Approximately
15,000 respondents will complete a
screener to determine eligibility for
participation in the study, estimated to
take 1 minute (0.016 hours), for a total
of 240 hours. Fifty-four hundred
respondents will complete the full
study, estimated to last 30 minutes (0.5
hours), for a total of 2,700 hours. The
total estimated burden is 2,970 hours
(30 hours plus 240 hours plus 2,700
hours).
Dated: November 29, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–29321 Filed 12–4–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0656]
Animal Drug User Fee Act; Public
Meeting; Request for Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Dec 04, 2012
Jkt 229001
Notice of meeting; request for
comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) is announcing the following
meeting: Animal Drug User Fee Act. The
topic to be discussed is proposed
recommendations for the
reauthorization of the Animal Drug User
Fee Act (ADUFA III).
Date and Time: The meeting will be
held on December 18, 2012, from 9 a.m.
to 12 p.m.
Location: The meeting will be held at
FDA’s Metro Park North Campus, 7519
Standish Pl., third floor, Meeting Room
A, Rockville, MD 20855. There is
parking near the building.
Contact: Jacqueline Farmer, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV–10), Food
and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish
Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–
8695, FAX: 240–276–9744, email:
ADUFAReauthorization@fda.hhs.gov.
Registration and Requests for Oral
Presentations: Send registration
information (including name, title, firm
name, address, telephone, and fax
number), and written material and
requests to make oral presentations, to
the contact person by December 11,
2012.
If you need special accommodations
due to a disability, please contact
Jacqueline Farmer at least 7 days in
advance.
Transcripts: Please be advised that as
soon as a transcript is available, it will
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be accessible at https://
www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed
at the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD. A transcript will
also be available in either hardcopy or
on CD–ROM, after submission of a
Freedom of Information request. Written
requests are to be sent to the Division
of Freedom of Information (ELEM–
1029), Food and Drug Administration,
12420 Parklawn Dr., Element Bldg.,
Rockville, MD 20857.
Comments: Interested persons may
submit either written comments
regarding this meeting to the Division of
Dockets Management (see Transcripts)
or electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. It is only
necessary to send one set of comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov. So that FDA can
consider comments and revise the
recommendations as necessary, we
request that comments be submitted to
the docket by January 4, 2013.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 5, 2012 / Notices
I. The ADUFA Program
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
A. What is ADUFA? What does it do?
FDA considers the timely review of
the safety and effectiveness of new
animal drug applications (NADAs) to be
central to the Agency’s mission to
protect and promote the public health.
Prior to 2004, the timeliness and
predictability of the new animal drug
review program was a concern. The
Animal Drug User Fee Act enacted in
2003 (Pub. L. 108–130; hereinafter
referred to as ‘‘ADUFA I’’), authorized
FDA to collect user fees that were to be
dedicated to expediting the review of
new animal drug applications in
accordance with certain performance
goals and to expand and modernize the
new animal drug review program. The
Agency agreed, under this new Act, to
meet a comprehensive set of
performance goals established to show
significant improvement in the
timeliness and predictability of the new
animal drug review process. The
implementation of ADUFA I provided a
significant funding increase that
enabled FDA to increase the number of
staff dedicated to the new animal drug
application review process by 30
percent since 2003.
In 2008, before ADUFA I expired,
Congress passed the Animal Drug User
Fee Amendments of 2008 (Pub. L. 110–
316; hereinafter referred to as ‘‘ADUFA
II’’) which included an extension of
ADUFA for an additional 5 years—fiscal
year (FY) 2009 to FY 2013. ADUFA II
performance goals were established
based on ADUFA I FY 2008 review
timeframes. In addition, FDA provided
program enhancements to reduce review
cycles and improve communications
during reviews. The ADUFA programs
have enabled FDA to speed up the
application review process for new
animal drugs without compromising the
quality of the Agency’s review.
B. ADUFA Achievements
As part of ADUFA I, FDA established
review performance goals that were
phased in over a 5-year period. These
performance goals, set from FY 2004
through FY 2008, enabled FDA to
achieve progressive, yearly
improvements in the time allotted for
review of new animal drug applications.
By the final year of ADUFA I ending on
September 30, 2008, FDA reviewed and
acted on 90 percent of the following
submission types within the times
specified:
• New animal drug applications and
reactivations of such applications
within 180 days after submission date.
• Non-manufacturing supplemental
new animal drug applications and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Dec 04, 2012
Jkt 229001
reactivations of such supplemental
applications within 180 days after
submission date.
• Manufacturing supplemental new
animal drug applications and
reactivations of such supplemental
applications within 120 days after
submission date.
• Investigational new animal drug
study submissions within 180 days after
submission date.
• Investigational new animal drug
submissions consisting of protocols
without substantial data within 60 days
after submission date.
• Administrative new animal drug
applications within 60 days after
submission date.
With the reauthorization of ADUFA
for an additional 5 years under ADUFA
II (FY 2009 to FY 2013), FDA agreed to
enhance and further improve the review
process via the following changes.
A key improvement under ADUFA II
is the ‘‘end-review amendment’’ (ERA)
process that allows FDA reviewers to
work with the drug sponsor to amend
certain pending submissions. The ERA
process allows us to decrease the
number of review cycles, which
ultimately leads to a shorter time to
approval. Improved communication
early in the process has the greatest
potential of reducing review cycles. The
greatest impact of this new tool in the
first 3 years under ADUFA II has been
with submissions of investigational new
animal drug (INAD) studies and study
protocols, which are the earliest review
processes impacted by ADUFA
performance goals.
The development of an electronic
submission tool has enabled sponsors to
submit applications and submissions
electronically, and has provided FDA
reviewers with the ability to evaluate
submissions online.
The joint participation of FDA and the
regulated industry in 10 public
workshops by the end of FY 2013 on
mutually agreed-upon topics has
enhanced communication and
transparency on topics critical to the
animal drug review and approval
process. To date, FDA and the regulated
industry have participated in eight
workshops with the final two planned
for FY 2013.
FDA is committed to improving the
animal drug review and business
processes to facilitate the timely
scheduling and conducting of foreign
preapproval inspections. Because of
processes developed under ADUFA II,
sponsors are now able to voluntarily
submit an annual facilities list and
notification 30 days prior to submitting
an NADA, a supplemental NADA, or an
INAD submission to inform FDA that
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72357
the application or submission includes
a foreign manufacturing facility.
FDA has published a number of
reports that provide useful background
on ADUFA I and ADUFA II. ADUFArelated Federal Register notices,
guidances, legislation, performance
reports, and financial reports can be
found at: https://www.fda.gov/For
Industry/UserFees/AnimalDrugUserFee
ActADUFA/default.htm.
II. Proposed ADUFA III
Recommendations
A. Enhancing the Process for Premarket
Review
We are proposing changes to the
performance goals that ADUFA II
established to further enhance the
process for review of animal drug
applications.
The ERA procedure implemented as
part of ADUFA II resulted in an increase
in the number of one-cycle reviews;
however, certain challenges associated
with the process restricted its full
utilization. We are proposing, among
other changes, to further improve the
review process by replacing the ERA
with shorter review times for certain
resubmissions and reactivations. To
allow time for the programming and
system changes required to make this
and other changes, we are proposing to
maintain the ADUFA II ERA process
and associated review performance
goals for FY 2014 for non-administrative
animal drug applications, nonmanufacturing supplemental animal
drug applications, investigational
animal drug study submissions, and
investigational animal drug submissions
consisting of protocols without
substantial data.
Starting on October 1, 2014 (for FYs
2015 to 2018), we are proposing to
discontinue the ERA procedures and
replace them with the process for
shorter review times for reactivations
and resubmissions. The performance
goals listed below for the shorter
reactivation and resubmission times
only apply when the sponsor provides
submissions for the NADA and the
INAD through the use of the eSubmitter
electronic submission tool.
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of non-administrative NADAs
within 180 days after the submission
date. An application is incomplete if it
would require additional data or
information to enable the Agency to
complete a comprehensive review of the
application and reach a decision on the
issue(s) presented in the application.
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of reactivated applications:
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
72358
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 5, 2012 / Notices
• Within 180 days after the
reactivated NADA submission date if
the Agency determines and notifies the
sponsor that the deficiencies are
substantial;
• Within 135 days after the
reactivated NADA submission date if
the Agency determines and notifies the
sponsor that the deficiencies are not
substantial; and the NADA reactivation
must be submitted no more than 120
days after the Agency’s dated
incomplete letter to qualify for the
shorter review time; and
• Within 180 days after the
reactivated NADA submission date if
the NADA reactivation is submitted
after 120 days of the Agency’s dated
incomplete letter or new substantial
information is provided in the
reactivated application.
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of non-manufacturing
supplemental animal drug applications
(i.e., supplemental animal drug
applications for which safety or
effectiveness data are required) within
180 days after the submission date. A
supplemental application is incomplete
if it would require additional data or
information to enable the Agency to
complete a comprehensive review of the
supplement and reach a decision on the
issue(s) presented in the supplement.
• The Agency will review and act on
90 percent of reactivated supplements:
• Within 180 days after the
resubmission date if the Agency
determines and notifies the sponsor that
the deficiencies are substantial.
• Within 135 days after the
resubmission date if the Agency
determines and notifies the sponsor that
the deficiencies are not substantial; and
the resubmission to the supplemental
application must be submitted no more
than 120 days after the Agency’s dated
incomplete letter to qualify for the
shorter review time; and
• Within 180 days after the
resubmission date if the resubmission to
the supplemental application is
submitted after 120 days of the Agency’s
dated incomplete letter or new
substantial information is provided in
the resubmission.
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of INAD study submissions
within 180 days after the submission
date. An INAD study submission is
incomplete if it would require
additional data or information to enable
the Agency to complete a
comprehensive review of the
submission and reach a decision on the
issue(s) presented in the submission.
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of resubmitted INAD study
submissions:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Dec 04, 2012
Jkt 229001
• Within 180 days after the
resubmitted INAD study submission
date if the Agency determines and
notifies the sponsor that the deficiencies
are substantial;
• Within 60 days after the
resubmitted INAD study submission
date if the Agency determines and
notifies the sponsor that the deficiencies
are not substantial; and the
resubmission must be submitted no
more than 120 days after the Agency’s
dated incomplete letter to qualify for the
shorter review time; and
• Within 180 days after the
resubmitted INAD study submission
date if the resubmission is submitted
after 120 days of the Agency’s dated
incomplete letter or new substantial
information is provided in the
resubmission.
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of INAD submissions consisting
of protocols without data that the
Agency and the sponsor consider to be
an essential part of the basis for making
the decision to approve or not approve
an animal drug application or
supplemental animal drug application
within 50 days after the submission
date. An INAD protocol without data
submission is incomplete if it would
require additional information to enable
the Agency to complete a
comprehensive review of the protocol
and reach a decision on the issue(s)
presented in the protocol.
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of resubmitted INAD protocol
without data submissions:
• Within 50 days after the
resubmission date if the Agency
determines and notifies the sponsor that
the deficiencies are substantial;
• Within 20 days after the
resubmitted INAD protocol without data
submission date if the Agency
determines and notifies the sponsor that
the deficiencies are not substantial; and
the resubmission must be submitted no
more than 120 days after the Agency’s
dated nonconcurrence letter to qualify
for the shorter review time; and
• Within 50 days after the
resubmission date if the resubmission is
submitted after 120 days of the Agency’s
dated nonconcurrence letter or new
substantial information is provided in
the resubmission.
B. Additional Review Enhancements
Proposal for FYs 2015 to 2018
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of microbial food safety hazard
characterization submissions within 100
days after the submission date.
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of qualifying labeling
supplements as described in 21 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
514.8(c)(2)(i)(A) and (D) within 60 days
after the submission date. Qualifying
labeling supplements are defined as
those submitted through the use of the
eSubmitter electronic submission tool,
for which the sponsor provides and
certifies a complete list of label changes
made in the application and that CVM
can determine upon initial review do
not decrease the safety of drug use.
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of non-qualifying supplemental
applications within 180 days after the
submission date.
C. Performance Goals Proposal
Affecting All Fiscal Years of ADUFA III
(2014 to 2018)
The Agency will maintain the ADUFA
II goals regarding work queue
procedures, timely meetings with
industry, review of administrative
NADAs, and preapproval foreign
inspections.
The Agency will review and act on 90
percent of manufacturing supplemental
animal drug applications within 120
days after the submission date. A
submission is incomplete if it would
require additional data or information to
enable the Agency to complete a
comprehensive review of the
submission and reach a decision on the
issue(s) presented in the submission.
• If the Agency determines and
notifies the sponsor that the deficiencies
are not substantial for manufacturing
supplements requiring prior approval
according to § 514.8(b), the Agency will
permit the manufacturing supplements
to be resubmitted as ‘‘Supplement—
Changes Being Effected in 30 Days’’ as
described in § 514.8(b)(3).
• If the Agency determines and
notifies the sponsor that the deficiencies
are substantial or new substantial
information is provided in the
resubmission, the Agency will review
and act on 90 percent of reactivated
manufacturing supplements within 120
days after the resubmission date.
The Agency will permit comparability
protocols as described in § 514.8(b)(2)(v)
to be submitted as protocols without
substantial data in an INAD file. The
Agency will review and act on 90
percent of INAD submissions consisting
of protocols without substantial data
within 50 days after the submission date
of the protocol.
The Agency will develop guidance for
a two-phased Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC)
technical section submission and review
process under the INAD file by the end
of FY 2014.
The Agency and the regulated
industry agree that data and/or
information which uniquely describes
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 5, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
the general attributes of the new animal
drug (e.g., the known characteristics of
the drug that can impact safety,
effectiveness, and/or quality) needs to
be submitted early in the new animal
drug development process in order to
enable the parties to reach agreement at
a presubmission conference or to begin
review of a protocol. Predicated on
submission of this information:
• The Agency will allow short
justifications within INAD protocols
without data submissions that are
limited in scope.
• The Agency will allow for the
concurrent submission of supporting
data and protocols provided that the
protocol is not submitted until the
supporting data has been in the
Agency’s queue for at least 50 days.
The Agency will allow for the
inclusion of this data and/or
information in presubmission
conferences, however it would not
preclude holding a presubmission
conference without such data.
Presubmission conferences will be held
approximately 100 days after the
submission of the data supporting the
request.
The Agency and the regulated
industry agree that dosage
characterization is part of the
effectiveness technical section of an
investigational new animal drug file. In
instances where data and/or information
about the dosage is integral to the
review of a protocol, the Agency and the
regulated industry agree that this data
and/or information should be submitted
as supporting data well in advance of
the protocol submission.
The Agency agrees to explore the
feasibility of pursuing statutory
revisions, consistent with the Agency’s
mission to protect and promote the
public health, that may expand the use
of conditional approvals to other
appropriate categories of new animal
drug applications and that may modify
the current requirement that the use of
multiple new animal drugs in the same
medicated feed be subject to an
approved application.
D. ADUFA III Enhancements for a
Modified Inflation Adjuster and
Workload Adjuster
ADUFA III financial enhancements
include a new statutory inflation
adjuster provision that accounts for
changes in FDA’s costs related to
payroll compensation and benefits as
well as changes in nonpayroll costs
through use of the Consumer Price
Index. ADUFA III also modifies the base
years for calculating the workload
adjuster, as specified in the ADUFA III
performance goals letter, to ensure that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Dec 04, 2012
Jkt 229001
it adequately captures changes in FDA’s
workload during ADUFA III.
E. Impact of ADUFA III Enhancements
on User Fee Revenue
The following table summarizes the
FY 2014 baseline and added funding to
support ADUFA III program:
Financial baseline
Dollars
FY 2014 Base Revenue 1 .........
One-Time Information Technology (IT) Funding ...............
Total Statutory Revenue for FY
2014 ......................................
21,600,000
2,000,000
23,600,000
72359
presentation by FDA and we will
provide an opportunity for other
organizations and individuals to make
presentations at the meeting or to
submit written comments to the docket.
So that FDA can consider comments
and revise the recommendations as
necessary, we request that comments be
submitted to the docket by January 4,
2013.
Dated: December 3, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–29498 Filed 12–3–12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
1 For
each year in FY 2015 to FY 2018, the
annual fee revenue will be further adjusted according to the new statutory provision for the
inflation adjuster and may be further adjusted
by the workload adjuster. In fiscal years 2016
to 2018, if applicable, the annual fee revenue
is subject to a number of possible adjustments, including for inflation and collection
shortfalls.
The statutory revenue for 2009, the
first year of ADUFA II, was $15,260,000.
The statutory revenue for the first year
of ADUFA III will be $23,600,000,
which includes one-time IT funding in
the amount of $2,000,000 for FY 2014.
The statute specifies annual revenue of
$21,600,000 for each of the FY 2015
through FY 2018, however this amount
is subject to a number of possible
adjustments, including for inflation and
collection shortfalls.
Additionally, ADUFA III offers the
following financial recommendations:
• A new provision for recovering
collection shortfalls is being offered to
ensure adequate funding for the animal
drug review process. For example, when
FDA sets fees for FY 2016, it may add
to the fee revenue the amount of any
shortfall in fees collected in FY 2014.
This process would follow in
subsequent years through the final year
adjustment, as specified in the statute.
• FDA has modified the fee revenue
distribution from 25 percent for each fee
type in ADUFA II to 20 percent in
application, 27 percent in product, 27
percent in sponsor, and 26 percent in
establishment fees in ADUFA III. The
purpose of changing the fee distribution
is to increase the revenue stream
stability, reduce application fee costs,
and minimize the potential for
collection shortfalls.
III. What information should you know
about the meeting?
We will convene a public meeting to
hear the public’s views on the proposed
recommendations for reauthorization of
the ADUFA program. We will conduct
the meeting on December 18, 2012, at
FDA’s Metro Park North Campus (see
Location). The meeting will include a
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0655]
Animal Generic Drug User Fee Act;
Public Meeting; Request for Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of meeting; request for
comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) is announcing the following
meeting: Animal Generic Drug User Fee
Act. The topic to be discussed is
proposed recommendations for the
reauthorization of the Animal Generic
Drug User Fee Act (AGDUFA II).
Date and Time: The meeting will be
held on December 18, 2012, from 1 p.m.
to 4 p.m.
Location: The meeting will be held at
FDA’s Metro Park North Campus, 7519
Standish Pl., third floor, Meeting Room
A, Rockville, MD 20855. There is
parking near the building.
Contact: Jacqueline Farmer, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV–10), Food
and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish
Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–
8695, FAX: 240–276–9744, email:
AGDUFAReauthorization@fda.hhs.gov.
Registration and Requests for Oral
Presentations: Send registration
information (including name, title, firm
name, address, telephone, and fax
number), and written material and
requests to make oral presentations, to
the contact person by December 11,
2012.
If you need special accommodations
due to a disability, please contact
Jacqueline Farmer at least 7 days in
advance.
Transcripts: Please be advised that as
soon as a transcript is available, it will
be accessible at https://
www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72356-72359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29498]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0656]
Animal Drug User Fee Act; Public Meeting; Request for Comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of meeting; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following
meeting: Animal Drug User Fee Act. The topic to be discussed is
proposed recommendations for the reauthorization of the Animal Drug
User Fee Act (ADUFA III).
Date and Time: The meeting will be held on December 18, 2012, from
9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Location: The meeting will be held at FDA's Metro Park North
Campus, 7519 Standish Pl., third floor, Meeting Room A, Rockville, MD
20855. There is parking near the building.
Contact: Jacqueline Farmer, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-
10), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD
20855, 240-276-8695, FAX: 240-276-9744, email:
ADUFAReauthorization@fda.hhs.gov.
Registration and Requests for Oral Presentations: Send registration
information (including name, title, firm name, address, telephone, and
fax number), and written material and requests to make oral
presentations, to the contact person by December 11, 2012.
If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please
contact Jacqueline Farmer at least 7 days in advance.
Transcripts: Please be advised that as soon as a transcript is
available, it will be accessible at https://www.regulations.gov. It may
be viewed at the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD. A
transcript will also be available in either hardcopy or on CD-ROM,
after submission of a Freedom of Information request. Written requests
are to be sent to the Division of Freedom of Information (ELEM-1029),
Food and Drug Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., Element Bldg.,
Rockville, MD 20857.
Comments: Interested persons may submit either written comments
regarding this meeting to the Division of Dockets Management (see
Transcripts) or electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. It
is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with
the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to
the docket at https://www.regulations.gov. So that FDA can consider
comments and revise the recommendations as necessary, we request that
comments be submitted to the docket by January 4, 2013.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 72357]]
I. The ADUFA Program
A. What is ADUFA? What does it do?
FDA considers the timely review of the safety and effectiveness of
new animal drug applications (NADAs) to be central to the Agency's
mission to protect and promote the public health. Prior to 2004, the
timeliness and predictability of the new animal drug review program was
a concern. The Animal Drug User Fee Act enacted in 2003 (Pub. L. 108-
130; hereinafter referred to as ``ADUFA I''), authorized FDA to collect
user fees that were to be dedicated to expediting the review of new
animal drug applications in accordance with certain performance goals
and to expand and modernize the new animal drug review program. The
Agency agreed, under this new Act, to meet a comprehensive set of
performance goals established to show significant improvement in the
timeliness and predictability of the new animal drug review process.
The implementation of ADUFA I provided a significant funding increase
that enabled FDA to increase the number of staff dedicated to the new
animal drug application review process by 30 percent since 2003.
In 2008, before ADUFA I expired, Congress passed the Animal Drug
User Fee Amendments of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-316; hereinafter referred to
as ``ADUFA II'') which included an extension of ADUFA for an additional
5 years--fiscal year (FY) 2009 to FY 2013. ADUFA II performance goals
were established based on ADUFA I FY 2008 review timeframes. In
addition, FDA provided program enhancements to reduce review cycles and
improve communications during reviews. The ADUFA programs have enabled
FDA to speed up the application review process for new animal drugs
without compromising the quality of the Agency's review.
B. ADUFA Achievements
As part of ADUFA I, FDA established review performance goals that
were phased in over a 5-year period. These performance goals, set from
FY 2004 through FY 2008, enabled FDA to achieve progressive, yearly
improvements in the time allotted for review of new animal drug
applications. By the final year of ADUFA I ending on September 30,
2008, FDA reviewed and acted on 90 percent of the following submission
types within the times specified:
New animal drug applications and reactivations of such
applications within 180 days after submission date.
Non-manufacturing supplemental new animal drug
applications and reactivations of such supplemental applications within
180 days after submission date.
Manufacturing supplemental new animal drug applications
and reactivations of such supplemental applications within 120 days
after submission date.
Investigational new animal drug study submissions within
180 days after submission date.
Investigational new animal drug submissions consisting of
protocols without substantial data within 60 days after submission
date.
Administrative new animal drug applications within 60 days
after submission date.
With the reauthorization of ADUFA for an additional 5 years under
ADUFA II (FY 2009 to FY 2013), FDA agreed to enhance and further
improve the review process via the following changes.
A key improvement under ADUFA II is the ``end-review amendment''
(ERA) process that allows FDA reviewers to work with the drug sponsor
to amend certain pending submissions. The ERA process allows us to
decrease the number of review cycles, which ultimately leads to a
shorter time to approval. Improved communication early in the process
has the greatest potential of reducing review cycles. The greatest
impact of this new tool in the first 3 years under ADUFA II has been
with submissions of investigational new animal drug (INAD) studies and
study protocols, which are the earliest review processes impacted by
ADUFA performance goals.
The development of an electronic submission tool has enabled
sponsors to submit applications and submissions electronically, and has
provided FDA reviewers with the ability to evaluate submissions online.
The joint participation of FDA and the regulated industry in 10
public workshops by the end of FY 2013 on mutually agreed-upon topics
has enhanced communication and transparency on topics critical to the
animal drug review and approval process. To date, FDA and the regulated
industry have participated in eight workshops with the final two
planned for FY 2013.
FDA is committed to improving the animal drug review and business
processes to facilitate the timely scheduling and conducting of foreign
preapproval inspections. Because of processes developed under ADUFA II,
sponsors are now able to voluntarily submit an annual facilities list
and notification 30 days prior to submitting an NADA, a supplemental
NADA, or an INAD submission to inform FDA that the application or
submission includes a foreign manufacturing facility.
FDA has published a number of reports that provide useful
background on ADUFA I and ADUFA II. ADUFA-related Federal Register
notices, guidances, legislation, performance reports, and financial
reports can be found at: https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/AnimalDrugUserFeeActADUFA/default.htm.
II. Proposed ADUFA III Recommendations
A. Enhancing the Process for Premarket Review
We are proposing changes to the performance goals that ADUFA II
established to further enhance the process for review of animal drug
applications.
The ERA procedure implemented as part of ADUFA II resulted in an
increase in the number of one-cycle reviews; however, certain
challenges associated with the process restricted its full utilization.
We are proposing, among other changes, to further improve the review
process by replacing the ERA with shorter review times for certain
resubmissions and reactivations. To allow time for the programming and
system changes required to make this and other changes, we are
proposing to maintain the ADUFA II ERA process and associated review
performance goals for FY 2014 for non-administrative animal drug
applications, non-manufacturing supplemental animal drug applications,
investigational animal drug study submissions, and investigational
animal drug submissions consisting of protocols without substantial
data.
Starting on October 1, 2014 (for FYs 2015 to 2018), we are
proposing to discontinue the ERA procedures and replace them with the
process for shorter review times for reactivations and resubmissions.
The performance goals listed below for the shorter reactivation and
resubmission times only apply when the sponsor provides submissions for
the NADA and the INAD through the use of the eSubmitter electronic
submission tool.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of non-administrative
NADAs within 180 days after the submission date. An application is
incomplete if it would require additional data or information to enable
the Agency to complete a comprehensive review of the application and
reach a decision on the issue(s) presented in the application.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of reactivated
applications:
[[Page 72358]]
Within 180 days after the reactivated NADA submission date
if the Agency determines and notifies the sponsor that the deficiencies
are substantial;
Within 135 days after the reactivated NADA submission date
if the Agency determines and notifies the sponsor that the deficiencies
are not substantial; and the NADA reactivation must be submitted no
more than 120 days after the Agency's dated incomplete letter to
qualify for the shorter review time; and
Within 180 days after the reactivated NADA submission date
if the NADA reactivation is submitted after 120 days of the Agency's
dated incomplete letter or new substantial information is provided in
the reactivated application.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of non-manufacturing
supplemental animal drug applications (i.e., supplemental animal drug
applications for which safety or effectiveness data are required)
within 180 days after the submission date. A supplemental application
is incomplete if it would require additional data or information to
enable the Agency to complete a comprehensive review of the supplement
and reach a decision on the issue(s) presented in the supplement.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of
reactivated supplements:
Within 180 days after the resubmission date if the Agency
determines and notifies the sponsor that the deficiencies are
substantial.
Within 135 days after the resubmission date if the Agency
determines and notifies the sponsor that the deficiencies are not
substantial; and the resubmission to the supplemental application must
be submitted no more than 120 days after the Agency's dated incomplete
letter to qualify for the shorter review time; and
Within 180 days after the resubmission date if the
resubmission to the supplemental application is submitted after 120
days of the Agency's dated incomplete letter or new substantial
information is provided in the resubmission.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of INAD study
submissions within 180 days after the submission date. An INAD study
submission is incomplete if it would require additional data or
information to enable the Agency to complete a comprehensive review of
the submission and reach a decision on the issue(s) presented in the
submission.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of resubmitted INAD
study submissions:
Within 180 days after the resubmitted INAD study
submission date if the Agency determines and notifies the sponsor that
the deficiencies are substantial;
Within 60 days after the resubmitted INAD study submission
date if the Agency determines and notifies the sponsor that the
deficiencies are not substantial; and the resubmission must be
submitted no more than 120 days after the Agency's dated incomplete
letter to qualify for the shorter review time; and
Within 180 days after the resubmitted INAD study
submission date if the resubmission is submitted after 120 days of the
Agency's dated incomplete letter or new substantial information is
provided in the resubmission.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of INAD submissions
consisting of protocols without data that the Agency and the sponsor
consider to be an essential part of the basis for making the decision
to approve or not approve an animal drug application or supplemental
animal drug application within 50 days after the submission date. An
INAD protocol without data submission is incomplete if it would require
additional information to enable the Agency to complete a comprehensive
review of the protocol and reach a decision on the issue(s) presented
in the protocol.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of resubmitted INAD
protocol without data submissions:
Within 50 days after the resubmission date if the Agency
determines and notifies the sponsor that the deficiencies are
substantial;
Within 20 days after the resubmitted INAD protocol without
data submission date if the Agency determines and notifies the sponsor
that the deficiencies are not substantial; and the resubmission must be
submitted no more than 120 days after the Agency's dated nonconcurrence
letter to qualify for the shorter review time; and
Within 50 days after the resubmission date if the
resubmission is submitted after 120 days of the Agency's dated
nonconcurrence letter or new substantial information is provided in the
resubmission.
B. Additional Review Enhancements Proposal for FYs 2015 to 2018
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of microbial food
safety hazard characterization submissions within 100 days after the
submission date.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of qualifying labeling
supplements as described in 21 CFR 514.8(c)(2)(i)(A) and (D) within 60
days after the submission date. Qualifying labeling supplements are
defined as those submitted through the use of the eSubmitter electronic
submission tool, for which the sponsor provides and certifies a
complete list of label changes made in the application and that CVM can
determine upon initial review do not decrease the safety of drug use.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of non-qualifying
supplemental applications within 180 days after the submission date.
C. Performance Goals Proposal Affecting All Fiscal Years of ADUFA III
(2014 to 2018)
The Agency will maintain the ADUFA II goals regarding work queue
procedures, timely meetings with industry, review of administrative
NADAs, and preapproval foreign inspections.
The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of manufacturing
supplemental animal drug applications within 120 days after the
submission date. A submission is incomplete if it would require
additional data or information to enable the Agency to complete a
comprehensive review of the submission and reach a decision on the
issue(s) presented in the submission.
If the Agency determines and notifies the sponsor that the
deficiencies are not substantial for manufacturing supplements
requiring prior approval according to Sec. 514.8(b), the Agency will
permit the manufacturing supplements to be resubmitted as
``Supplement--Changes Being Effected in 30 Days'' as described in Sec.
514.8(b)(3).
If the Agency determines and notifies the sponsor that the
deficiencies are substantial or new substantial information is provided
in the resubmission, the Agency will review and act on 90 percent of
reactivated manufacturing supplements within 120 days after the
resubmission date.
The Agency will permit comparability protocols as described in
Sec. 514.8(b)(2)(v) to be submitted as protocols without substantial
data in an INAD file. The Agency will review and act on 90 percent of
INAD submissions consisting of protocols without substantial data
within 50 days after the submission date of the protocol.
The Agency will develop guidance for a two-phased Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) technical section submission and
review process under the INAD file by the end of FY 2014.
The Agency and the regulated industry agree that data and/or
information which uniquely describes
[[Page 72359]]
the general attributes of the new animal drug (e.g., the known
characteristics of the drug that can impact safety, effectiveness, and/
or quality) needs to be submitted early in the new animal drug
development process in order to enable the parties to reach agreement
at a presubmission conference or to begin review of a protocol.
Predicated on submission of this information:
The Agency will allow short justifications within INAD
protocols without data submissions that are limited in scope.
The Agency will allow for the concurrent submission of
supporting data and protocols provided that the protocol is not
submitted until the supporting data has been in the Agency's queue for
at least 50 days.
The Agency will allow for the inclusion of this data and/or
information in presubmission conferences, however it would not preclude
holding a presubmission conference without such data. Presubmission
conferences will be held approximately 100 days after the submission of
the data supporting the request.
The Agency and the regulated industry agree that dosage
characterization is part of the effectiveness technical section of an
investigational new animal drug file. In instances where data and/or
information about the dosage is integral to the review of a protocol,
the Agency and the regulated industry agree that this data and/or
information should be submitted as supporting data well in advance of
the protocol submission.
The Agency agrees to explore the feasibility of pursuing statutory
revisions, consistent with the Agency's mission to protect and promote
the public health, that may expand the use of conditional approvals to
other appropriate categories of new animal drug applications and that
may modify the current requirement that the use of multiple new animal
drugs in the same medicated feed be subject to an approved application.
D. ADUFA III Enhancements for a Modified Inflation Adjuster and
Workload Adjuster
ADUFA III financial enhancements include a new statutory inflation
adjuster provision that accounts for changes in FDA's costs related to
payroll compensation and benefits as well as changes in nonpayroll
costs through use of the Consumer Price Index. ADUFA III also modifies
the base years for calculating the workload adjuster, as specified in
the ADUFA III performance goals letter, to ensure that it adequately
captures changes in FDA's workload during ADUFA III.
E. Impact of ADUFA III Enhancements on User Fee Revenue
The following table summarizes the FY 2014 baseline and added
funding to support ADUFA III program:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial baseline Dollars
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2014 Base Revenue \1\................................... 21,600,000
One-Time Information Technology (IT) Funding............... 2,000,000
Total Statutory Revenue for FY 2014........................ 23,600,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For each year in FY 2015 to FY 2018, the annual fee revenue will be
further adjusted according to the new statutory provision for the
inflation adjuster and may be further adjusted by the workload
adjuster. In fiscal years 2016 to 2018, if applicable, the annual fee
revenue is subject to a number of possible adjustments, including for
inflation and collection shortfalls.
The statutory revenue for 2009, the first year of ADUFA II, was
$15,260,000. The statutory revenue for the first year of ADUFA III will
be $23,600,000, which includes one-time IT funding in the amount of
$2,000,000 for FY 2014. The statute specifies annual revenue of
$21,600,000 for each of the FY 2015 through FY 2018, however this
amount is subject to a number of possible adjustments, including for
inflation and collection shortfalls.
Additionally, ADUFA III offers the following financial
recommendations:
A new provision for recovering collection shortfalls is
being offered to ensure adequate funding for the animal drug review
process. For example, when FDA sets fees for FY 2016, it may add to the
fee revenue the amount of any shortfall in fees collected in FY 2014.
This process would follow in subsequent years through the final year
adjustment, as specified in the statute.
FDA has modified the fee revenue distribution from 25
percent for each fee type in ADUFA II to 20 percent in application, 27
percent in product, 27 percent in sponsor, and 26 percent in
establishment fees in ADUFA III. The purpose of changing the fee
distribution is to increase the revenue stream stability, reduce
application fee costs, and minimize the potential for collection
shortfalls.
III. What information should you know about the meeting?
We will convene a public meeting to hear the public's views on the
proposed recommendations for reauthorization of the ADUFA program. We
will conduct the meeting on December 18, 2012, at FDA's Metro Park
North Campus (see Location). The meeting will include a presentation by
FDA and we will provide an opportunity for other organizations and
individuals to make presentations at the meeting or to submit written
comments to the docket. So that FDA can consider comments and revise
the recommendations as necessary, we request that comments be submitted
to the docket by January 4, 2013.
Dated: December 3, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-29498 Filed 12-3-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P