Secondary Direct Food Additives Permitted in Food for Human Consumption; Sodium Dodecylbenzenesulfonate, 71695-71697 [2012-29279]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
PART 21—CERTIFICATION
PROCEDURES FOR PRODUCTS AND
PARTS
1. The authority citation for part 21
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7572; 49 U.S.C.
106(g), 40105, 40113, 44701–44702, 44704,
44707, 44709, 44711, 44713, 44715, 45303.
2. In § 21.97, revise paragraph (a)(2) to
read as follows:
■
§ 21.97 Approval of major changes in type
design.
(a) * * *
(2) Show that the change and areas
affected by the change comply with the
applicable requirements of this
subchapter, and provide the FAA the
means by which such compliance has
been shown; and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 21.101, revise paragraphs (a),
(b) introductory text, (b)(3), and (c) to
read as follows:
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
§ 21.101 Designation of applicable
regulations.
(a) An applicant for a change to a type
certificate must show that the change
and areas affected by the change comply
with the airworthiness requirements
applicable to the category of the product
in effect on the date of the application
for the change and with parts 34 and 36
of this chapter. Exceptions are detailed
in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph
(g) of this section, if paragraphs (b)(1),
(2), or (3) of this section apply, an
applicant may show that the change and
areas affected by the change comply
with an earlier amendment of a
regulation required by paragraph (a) of
this section, and of any other regulation
the FAA finds is directly related.
However, the earlier amended
regulation may not precede either the
corresponding regulation incorporated
by reference in the type certificate, or
any regulation in §§ 23.2, 25.2, 27.2, or
29.2 of this subchapter that is related to
the change. The applicant may show
compliance with an earlier amendment
of a regulation for any of the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Each area, system, component,
equipment, or appliance that is affected
by the change, for which the FAA finds
that compliance with a regulation
described in paragraph (a) of this
section would not contribute materially
to the level of safety of the product or
would be impractical.
(c) An applicant for a change to an
aircraft (other than a rotorcraft) of 6,000
pounds or less maximum weight, or to
a non-turbine rotorcraft of 3,000 pounds
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Dec 03, 2012
Jkt 229001
or less maximum weight may show that
the change and areas affected by the
change comply with the regulations
incorporated by reference in the type
certificate. However, if the FAA finds
that the change is significant in an area,
the FAA may designate compliance
with an amendment to the regulation
incorporated by reference in the type
certificate that applies to the change and
any regulation that the FAA finds is
directly related, unless the FAA also
finds that compliance with that
amendment or regulation would not
contribute materially to the level of
safety of the product or would be
impractical.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC on November 21,
2012.
Michael P. Huerta,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012–29276 Filed 12–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 173
[Docket No. FDA–2011–F–0853]
Secondary Direct Food Additives
Permitted in Food for Human
Consumption; Sodium
Dodecylbenzenesulfonate
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
food additive regulations to provide for
the safe use of sodium
dodecylbenzenesulfonate (CAS No.
25155–30–0) as an antimicrobial agent
for use in wash water for fruits and
vegetables without the requirement of a
potable water rinse. This action is in
response to a petition filed by Ecolab,
Inc.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective December 4,
2012. Submit either electronic or
written objections and requests for a
hearing by January 3, 2013. See section
VII of this document for information on
the filing of objections.
ADDRESSES: You may submit either
electronic or written objections and
requests for a hearing, identified by
Docket No. FDA–2011–F–0853, by any
of the following methods:
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71695
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written objections in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and
Docket No. FDA–2011–F–0853 for this
rulemaking. All objections received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
objections, see the ‘‘Objections’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
objections received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Molly Harry, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (HFS–265), Food and
Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 240–
402–1075.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In a notice published in the Federal
Register of February 2, 2012 (77 FR
5201), FDA announced that a food
additive petition (FAP 2A4785) had
been filed by Ecolab, Inc., 370 North
Wabasha St., St. Paul, MN 55102–1390.
The petition proposed to amend the
food additive regulations in part 173,
‘‘Secondary Direct Food Additives
Permitted in Food for Human
Consumption’’ (21 CFR part 173), to
provide for the safe use of sodium
dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS) as an
antimicrobial agent used as a
component of an antimicrobial
formulation added to wash water for
fruits and vegetables (e.g., whole fruits
and vegetables as well as fruits,
vegetables, and herbs that have been
chopped, sliced, cut, or peeled) to
reduce microorganisms in wash water
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
71696
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
and on the surfaces of treated fruits and
vegetables. Fruits and vegetables treated
by the additive do not require a potable
water rinse. The petition requested that
the additive be considered for use only
in certain food service facilities. The
additive may be used at a level not to
exceed 111 milligrams per kilogram of
the wash water.
The use of SDBS is currently
approved in washing or to assist in the
peeling of fruits and vegetables under
§ 173.315 provided its use is followed
by a potable water rinse. In addition,
FDA food additive regulations permit
the use of SDBS as an indirect food
additive for use as a component of
single and repeated use food contact
substances (21 CFR 177.1010, 177.1200,
177.1630, 177.2600, and 177.2800), in
sanitizing solutions (21 CFR 178.1010),
and in the production of animal glue (21
CFR 178.3120).
The definition of ‘‘pesticide
chemical’’ under section 201(q)(1)(B)(i)
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
321(q)(1)(B)(i)), excludes an
antimicrobial added to water that comes
into contact with food, in the preparing,
packing, or holding of the food for
commercial purposes. This exclusion
applies whether the water is to contact
raw agricultural commodities or
processed food. Consequently, such an
antimicrobial is a ‘‘food additive’’ under
section 201(s) of the FD&C Act and
subject to the requirements in section
409 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 348).
The petitioned use of SDBS as an
antimicrobial agent in processing water
is for a food additive use in certain food
service facilities. Although the
petitioned use of SDBS is regulated
under section 409 of the FD&C Act as a
food additive, this intended use of SDBS
may nevertheless be subject to
regulation as a pesticide under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Therefore,
manufacturers intending to use this food
additive for this intended use should
contact the Environmental Protection
Agency to determine whether this use
requires a pesticide registration under
FIFRA.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
II. Evaluation of Safety
Under the general safety standard in
section 409 of the FD&C Act, a food
additive cannot be approved for a
particular use unless a fair evaluation of
the data available to FDA establishes
that the additive is safe for that use.
FDA’s food additive regulations (21 CFR
170.3(i)) define ‘‘safe’’ as ‘‘a reasonable
certainty in the minds of competent
scientists that the substance is not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Dec 03, 2012
Jkt 229001
harmful under the intended conditions
of use.’’
To establish with reasonable certainty
that a food additive is not harmful
under its intended conditions of use,
FDA considers the projected human
dietary intake of the additive, the
additive’s toxicological data, and other
relevant information (such as published
literature) available to FDA. As part of
FDA’s safety evaluation, FDA reviewed
data from published studies in animals
on the safety of SDBS, including a 2year carcinogenicity study in rats and a
multigeneration reproductive study
with rats. Based on the results from
these studies and FDA’s estimated
dietary intake to SDBS from current and
the proposed food uses, FDA concludes
that there is a reasonable certainty of no
harm and the petitioned use of SDBS is
safe within the meaning of section 409
of the FD&C Act.
III. Conclusion
FDA reviewed data in the petition and
other available relevant material to
evaluate the safety of SDBS as an
antimicrobial agent for use in wash
water for fruits and vegetables without
the requirement of a potable water rinse.
Based on this information, FDA
concludes that the proposed use of the
additive is safe and the additive will
achieve its intended technical effect as
an antimicrobial agent under the
proposed conditions of use. Therefore,
the regulations in part 173 should be
amended as set forth in this document.
IV. Public Disclosure
In accordance with § 171.1(h) (21 CFR
171.1(h)), the petition and the
documents that FDA considered and
relied upon in reaching its decision to
approve the petition will be made
available for inspection at the Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition by
appointment with the information
contact person (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). As provided in
§ 171.1(h), FDA will delete from the
documents any materials that are not
available for public disclosure before
making the documents available for
inspection.
V. Environmental Impact
FDA has carefully considered the
potential environmental effects of this
action. FDA has concluded that the
action will not have a significant impact
on the human environment, and that an
environmental impact statement is not
required. FDA’s finding of no significant
impact and the evidence supporting that
finding, contained in an environmental
assessment, may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no collection
of information. Therefore, clearance by
the Office of Management and Budget
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 is not required.
VII. Objections
Any person who will be adversely
affected by this regulation may file with
the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or
written objections. Each objection shall
be separately numbered, and each
numbered objection shall specify with
particularity the provisions of the
regulation to which objection is made
and the grounds for the objection. Each
numbered objection on which a hearing
is requested shall specifically so state.
Failure to request a hearing for any
particular objection shall constitute a
waiver of the right to a hearing on that
objection. Each numbered objection for
which a hearing is requested shall
include a detailed description and
analysis of the specific factual
information intended to be presented in
support of the objection in the event
that a hearing is held. Failure to include
such a description and analysis for any
particular objection shall constitute a
waiver of the right to a hearing on the
objection. It is only necessary to send
only one set of documents. Identify
documents with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Any objections received in
response to the regulation may be seen
in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
VIII. Section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act
FDA’s review of this petition was
limited to section 409 of the FD&C Act.
This final rule is not a statement
regarding compliance with other
sections of the FD&C Act. For example,
the Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act of 2007, which was
signed into law on September 27, 2007,
amended the FD&C Act to, among other
things, add section 301(ll) (21 U.S.C.
331(ll)). Section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act
prohibits the introduction or delivery
for introduction into interstate
commerce of any food that contains a
drug approved under section 505 of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355), a biological
product licensed under section 351 of
the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
262), or a drug or biological product for
which substantial clinical investigations
have been instituted and their existence
has been made public, unless one of the
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
exemptions in section 301(ll)(1) to (ll)(4)
applies. In our review of this petition,
FDA did not consider whether section
301(ll) or any of its exemptions apply to
food containing this additive.
Accordingly, this final rule should not
be construed to be a statement that a
food containing this additive, if
introduced or delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce, would not
violate section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act.
Furthermore, this language is included
in all food additive final rules and
therefore should not be construed to be
a statement of the likelihood that
section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act applies.
Dated: November 28, 2012.
Susan M. Bernard,
Director, Office of Regulations, Policy and
Social Sciences, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 173
RIN 1625–AA08
Food additives.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Director, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition, 21 CFR part 173 is
amended as follows:
PART 173—SECONDARY DIRECT
FOOD ADDITIVES PERMITTED IN
FOOD FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 173 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 342, 348.
2. Section 173.405 is added to subpart
D to read as follows:
■
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
§ 173.405 Sodium
dodecylbenzenesulfonate.
Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate
(CAS No. 25155–30–0) may be safely
used in accordance with the following
prescribed conditions:
(a) The additive is an antimicrobial
agent used in wash water for fruits and
vegetables. The additive may be used at
a level not to exceed 111 milligrams per
kilogram in the wash water. Fruits and
vegetables treated by the additive do not
require a potable water rinse.
(b) The additive is limited to use in
commissaries, cafeterias, restaurants,
retail food establishments, nonprofit
food establishments, and other food
service operations in which food is
prepared for or served directly to the
consumer.
(c) To assure safe use of the additive,
the label or labeling of the additive
container shall bear, in addition to the
other information required by the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,
adequate directions to assure use in
compliance with the provisions of this
section.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Dec 03, 2012
Jkt 229001
[FR Doc. 2012–29279 Filed 12–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0971]
Safety Zone; Overhead Cable
Replacement, Maumee River, Toledo,
OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary Safety Zone on
the waters of Maumee River, Toledo,
Ohio, from 8:30 a.m. on November 27,
2012 until 6:30 p.m. on December 7,
2012. This safety zone will encompass
all waters of Maumee River starting
from the CSX Railroad Bridge at River
Mile Marker 1.07 and ending 700 feet
downriver from the CSX Railroad
Bridge. This temporary Safety Zone is
necessary to protect persons operating
in the area.
DATES: This temporary final rule is
effective December 4, 2012. This rule
has been enforced with actual notice
since November 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2012–0971. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ You may visit the Docket
Management Facility, Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email MST1 Kevin Biami,
Marine Safety Unit Toledo, Coast Guard;
telephone (419) 418–6008, email
Kevin.E.Biami@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71697
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
On October 18, 2012, the Coast Guard
established a temporary final rule (TFR)
entitled Safety Zone; Overhead Cable
Replacement, Maumee River, Toledo,
OH (docket number USCG–2012–0948)
in support of the replacement of
electrical cables suspended over the
Maumee River. To coincide with the
expected schedule of the cable
replacement project, that TFR was
effective from 9:30 a.m. on October 23,
2012 until 3 p.m. on October 26, 2012.
However, due to an equipment failure,
an unforeseen breakage of one of the
electrical cables and inclement weather
conditions, the contractor had requested
an extension of the safety zone, and a
subsequent TFR was established on
October 26, 2012, extending the safety
zone from 9:30 a.m. on October 27, 2012
until 3 p.m. on November 2, 2012. Due
to the effects of Hurricane Sandy, the
contractor was unable to complete the
operation and has requested that a new
safety zone be established from 8:30
a.m. on November 27, 2012 until 6:30
p.m. on December 7, 2012.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest. The final details
for this stage of the operation were not
known to the Coast Guard until there
was insufficient time remaining before
the operation to publish an NPRM.
Thus, delaying the effective date of this
rule to wait for a comment period to run
would be both impracticable and
contrary to the public interest because it
would inhibit the Coast Guard’s ability
to protect the public from the hazards
associated with this Coast Guard
operation.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Waiting for a 30 day effective
period to run is impracticable and
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 4, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71695-71697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29279]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 173
[Docket No. FDA-2011-F-0853]
Secondary Direct Food Additives Permitted in Food for Human
Consumption; Sodium Dodecylbenzenesulfonate
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the food
additive regulations to provide for the safe use of sodium
dodecylbenzenesulfonate (CAS No. 25155-30-0) as an antimicrobial agent
for use in wash water for fruits and vegetables without the requirement
of a potable water rinse. This action is in response to a petition
filed by Ecolab, Inc.
DATES: This rule is effective December 4, 2012. Submit either
electronic or written objections and requests for a hearing by January
3, 2013. See section VII of this document for information on the filing
of objections.
ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written objections and
requests for a hearing, identified by Docket No. FDA-2011-F-0853, by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written objections in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper or CD-ROM
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name
and Docket No. FDA-2011-F-0853 for this rulemaking. All objections
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions
on submitting objections, see the ``Objections'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
objections received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Molly Harry, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1075.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In a notice published in the Federal Register of February 2, 2012
(77 FR 5201), FDA announced that a food additive petition (FAP 2A4785)
had been filed by Ecolab, Inc., 370 North Wabasha St., St. Paul, MN
55102-1390. The petition proposed to amend the food additive
regulations in part 173, ``Secondary Direct Food Additives Permitted in
Food for Human Consumption'' (21 CFR part 173), to provide for the safe
use of sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS) as an antimicrobial agent
used as a component of an antimicrobial formulation added to wash water
for fruits and vegetables (e.g., whole fruits and vegetables as well as
fruits, vegetables, and herbs that have been chopped, sliced, cut, or
peeled) to reduce microorganisms in wash water
[[Page 71696]]
and on the surfaces of treated fruits and vegetables. Fruits and
vegetables treated by the additive do not require a potable water
rinse. The petition requested that the additive be considered for use
only in certain food service facilities. The additive may be used at a
level not to exceed 111 milligrams per kilogram of the wash water.
The use of SDBS is currently approved in washing or to assist in
the peeling of fruits and vegetables under Sec. 173.315 provided its
use is followed by a potable water rinse. In addition, FDA food
additive regulations permit the use of SDBS as an indirect food
additive for use as a component of single and repeated use food contact
substances (21 CFR 177.1010, 177.1200, 177.1630, 177.2600, and
177.2800), in sanitizing solutions (21 CFR 178.1010), and in the
production of animal glue (21 CFR 178.3120).
The definition of ``pesticide chemical'' under section
201(q)(1)(B)(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C
Act) (21 U.S.C. 321(q)(1)(B)(i)), excludes an antimicrobial added to
water that comes into contact with food, in the preparing, packing, or
holding of the food for commercial purposes. This exclusion applies
whether the water is to contact raw agricultural commodities or
processed food. Consequently, such an antimicrobial is a ``food
additive'' under section 201(s) of the FD&C Act and subject to the
requirements in section 409 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 348). The
petitioned use of SDBS as an antimicrobial agent in processing water is
for a food additive use in certain food service facilities. Although
the petitioned use of SDBS is regulated under section 409 of the FD&C
Act as a food additive, this intended use of SDBS may nevertheless be
subject to regulation as a pesticide under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Therefore, manufacturers
intending to use this food additive for this intended use should
contact the Environmental Protection Agency to determine whether this
use requires a pesticide registration under FIFRA.
II. Evaluation of Safety
Under the general safety standard in section 409 of the FD&C Act, a
food additive cannot be approved for a particular use unless a fair
evaluation of the data available to FDA establishes that the additive
is safe for that use. FDA's food additive regulations (21 CFR 170.3(i))
define ``safe'' as ``a reasonable certainty in the minds of competent
scientists that the substance is not harmful under the intended
conditions of use.''
To establish with reasonable certainty that a food additive is not
harmful under its intended conditions of use, FDA considers the
projected human dietary intake of the additive, the additive's
toxicological data, and other relevant information (such as published
literature) available to FDA. As part of FDA's safety evaluation, FDA
reviewed data from published studies in animals on the safety of SDBS,
including a 2-year carcinogenicity study in rats and a multigeneration
reproductive study with rats. Based on the results from these studies
and FDA's estimated dietary intake to SDBS from current and the
proposed food uses, FDA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty
of no harm and the petitioned use of SDBS is safe within the meaning of
section 409 of the FD&C Act.
III. Conclusion
FDA reviewed data in the petition and other available relevant
material to evaluate the safety of SDBS as an antimicrobial agent for
use in wash water for fruits and vegetables without the requirement of
a potable water rinse. Based on this information, FDA concludes that
the proposed use of the additive is safe and the additive will achieve
its intended technical effect as an antimicrobial agent under the
proposed conditions of use. Therefore, the regulations in part 173
should be amended as set forth in this document.
IV. Public Disclosure
In accordance with Sec. 171.1(h) (21 CFR 171.1(h)), the petition
and the documents that FDA considered and relied upon in reaching its
decision to approve the petition will be made available for inspection
at the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition by appointment with
the information contact person (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
As provided in Sec. 171.1(h), FDA will delete from the documents any
materials that are not available for public disclosure before making
the documents available for inspection.
V. Environmental Impact
FDA has carefully considered the potential environmental effects of
this action. FDA has concluded that the action will not have a
significant impact on the human environment, and that an environmental
impact statement is not required. FDA's finding of no significant
impact and the evidence supporting that finding, contained in an
environmental assessment, may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no collection of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
VII. Objections
Any person who will be adversely affected by this regulation may
file with the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) either
electronic or written objections. Each objection shall be separately
numbered, and each numbered objection shall specify with particularity
the provisions of the regulation to which objection is made and the
grounds for the objection. Each numbered objection on which a hearing
is requested shall specifically so state. Failure to request a hearing
for any particular objection shall constitute a waiver of the right to
a hearing on that objection. Each numbered objection for which a
hearing is requested shall include a detailed description and analysis
of the specific factual information intended to be presented in support
of the objection in the event that a hearing is held. Failure to
include such a description and analysis for any particular objection
shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing on the objection.
It is only necessary to send only one set of documents. Identify
documents with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Any objections received in response to the regulation
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday.
VIII. Section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act
FDA's review of this petition was limited to section 409 of the
FD&C Act. This final rule is not a statement regarding compliance with
other sections of the FD&C Act. For example, the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of 2007, which was signed into law on
September 27, 2007, amended the FD&C Act to, among other things, add
section 301(ll) (21 U.S.C. 331(ll)). Section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act
prohibits the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of any food that contains a drug approved under section 505 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355), a biological product licensed under
section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), or a drug
or biological product for which substantial clinical investigations
have been instituted and their existence has been made public, unless
one of the
[[Page 71697]]
exemptions in section 301(ll)(1) to (ll)(4) applies. In our review of
this petition, FDA did not consider whether section 301(ll) or any of
its exemptions apply to food containing this additive. Accordingly,
this final rule should not be construed to be a statement that a food
containing this additive, if introduced or delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce, would not violate section 301(ll) of the FD&C
Act. Furthermore, this language is included in all food additive final
rules and therefore should not be construed to be a statement of the
likelihood that section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act applies.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 173
Food additives.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Director, Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition, 21 CFR part 173 is amended as follows:
PART 173--SECONDARY DIRECT FOOD ADDITIVES PERMITTED IN FOOD FOR
HUMAN CONSUMPTION
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 173 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 342, 348.
0
2. Section 173.405 is added to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 173.405 Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate.
Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (CAS No. 25155-30-0) may be safely
used in accordance with the following prescribed conditions:
(a) The additive is an antimicrobial agent used in wash water for
fruits and vegetables. The additive may be used at a level not to
exceed 111 milligrams per kilogram in the wash water. Fruits and
vegetables treated by the additive do not require a potable water
rinse.
(b) The additive is limited to use in commissaries, cafeterias,
restaurants, retail food establishments, nonprofit food establishments,
and other food service operations in which food is prepared for or
served directly to the consumer.
(c) To assure safe use of the additive, the label or labeling of
the additive container shall bear, in addition to the other information
required by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, adequate
directions to assure use in compliance with the provisions of this
section.
Dated: November 28, 2012.
Susan M. Bernard,
Director, Office of Regulations, Policy and Social Sciences, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2012-29279 Filed 12-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P