Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-SGIP 2.0, Inc., 71830-71831 [2012-29266]
Download as PDF
71830
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 4, 2012 / Notices
Dated: November 27, 2012.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
[FR Doc. 2012–29209 Filed 12–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–AT–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1103–0100]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Extension of a Previously
Approved Information Collection;
Comments Requested Monitoring
Information Collections
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
ACTION:
Overview of This Information
Collection
30-Day Notice.
The Department of Justice (DOJ)
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services (COPS) will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The extension of
a previously approved information
collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies. This information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register Volume 77, Number 189, page
59664 on September 28, 2012, allowing
for a 60 day comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for an additional 30 days for public
comment until January 3, 2013. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments, especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Danielle Ouellette,
Department of Justice Office of
Community Oriented Policing Services,
145 N Street NE., Washington, DC
20530. Additionally, comments may be
submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202)
395–5806. Written comments and
suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Dec 03, 2012
Jkt 229001
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a previously approved
collection
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Monitoring Information Collections
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
None. U.S. Department of Justice Office
of Community Oriented Policing
Services
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Law enforcement agencies and
other public and private entities that
apply for COPS Office grants or
cooperative agreements will be asked
complete the COPS Application
Package. The COPS Application Package
includes all of the necessary forms and
instructions that an applicant needs to
review and complete to apply for COPS
grant funding. The package is used as a
standard template for all COPS
programs.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: It is estimated that 150
respondents annually will complete the
collections: At 3 hours per respondent.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 450
total annual burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3W–
1407B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: November 27, 2012.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2012–29212 Filed 12–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–AT–P
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Sematech, Inc. d/b/a
International Sematech
Notice is hereby given that, on
October 19, 2012, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
Sematech, Inc. d/b/a International
Sematech (‘‘SEMATECH’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd., Tokyo,
JAPAN, has withdrawn as a party to this
venture.
In addition, Pall Corporation, Port
Washington, NY, has been added as a
party to the International SEMATECH
Manufacturing Initiative, Inc. (‘‘ISMI’’).
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and SEMATECH
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On April 22, 1988, SEMATECH filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on May 19, 1988 (53 FR
17987).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on June 29, 2012. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on July 25, 2012 (77 FR 43615).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012–29273 Filed 12–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—SGIP 2.0, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on
October 17, 2012, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 4, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), SGIP
2.0, Inc. (‘‘SGIP 2.0’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing (1) the name and
principal place of business of the
standards development organization
and (2) the nature and scope of its
standards development activities. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to
actual damages under specified
circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the name and principal place of
business of the standards development
organization is SGIP 2.0, Inc., c/o
Gesmer Updegrove LLP, Boston, MA.
The nature and scope of SGIP 2.0’s
standards development activities are:
SGIP 2.0 is organized exclusively for
charitable, religious, educational,
literary, and scientific purposes, within
the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (or the corresponding
provision of any subsequent federal tax
law), and the regulations currently or
hereafter promulgated thereunder. In
furtherance of such purposes, SGIP 2.0
is organized and will be operated
primarily to continue the work of the
unincorporated SmartGrid
Interoperability Panel, by supporting the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology in fulfilling its
responsibilities pursuant to the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007,
including but not limited to by (a)
providing technical guidance and
coordination to help facilitate standards
development for smart grid
interoperability; (b) identifying and
specifying testing and certification
requirements, including provision of the
underlying rationale to assess
achievement of interoperability using
smart grid standards; (c) informing and
educating smart grid industry
stakeholders regarding smart grid
interoperability and related benefits; (d)
liaising with similar organizations in
other countries to help establish global
smart grid interoperability alignment;
and (e) undertaking such other activities
as may from time to time be appropriate
to further the purposes and achieve the
goals set forth above.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012–29266 Filed 12–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Dec 03, 2012
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—3D PDF Consortium, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on
November 8, 2012, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 3D
Consortium, Inc. (‘‘3D PDF’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Boeing Shared Services Group, Seattle,
WA, has been added as a party to this
venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and 3D PDF
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On March 27, 2012, 3D PDF filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on April 20, 2012 (77 FR 23754).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on August 20, 2012. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on September 14, 2012 (77 FR
56861).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012–29269 Filed 12–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[OMB Number 1117–0006]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested: Application for
Individual Manufacturing Quota for a
Basic Class of Controlled Substance
and for Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine,
and Phenylpropanolamine
ACTION:
PO 00000
60-Day Notice.
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71831
The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA), will
be submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted
until February 4, 2013. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
If you have comments, especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Cathy Gallagher, Chief,
Liaison and Policy Section, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, VA 22152.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of Information Collection
1117–0006
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Application for Individual
Manufacturing Quota for a Basic Class
of Controlled Substance and for
Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, and
Phenylpropanolamine (DEA Form 189).
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71830-71831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29266]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--SGIP 2.0, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on October 17, 2012, pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative
[[Page 71831]]
Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the
Act''), SGIP 2.0, Inc. (``SGIP 2.0'') has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place
of business of the standards development organization is SGIP 2.0,
Inc., c/o Gesmer Updegrove LLP, Boston, MA. The nature and scope of
SGIP 2.0's standards development activities are: SGIP 2.0 is organized
exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, literary, and
scientific purposes, within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (or the corresponding
provision of any subsequent federal tax law), and the regulations
currently or hereafter promulgated thereunder. In furtherance of such
purposes, SGIP 2.0 is organized and will be operated primarily to
continue the work of the unincorporated SmartGrid Interoperability
Panel, by supporting the National Institute of Standards and Technology
in fulfilling its responsibilities pursuant to the Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007, including but not limited to by (a) providing
technical guidance and coordination to help facilitate standards
development for smart grid interoperability; (b) identifying and
specifying testing and certification requirements, including provision
of the underlying rationale to assess achievement of interoperability
using smart grid standards; (c) informing and educating smart grid
industry stakeholders regarding smart grid interoperability and related
benefits; (d) liaising with similar organizations in other countries to
help establish global smart grid interoperability alignment; and (e)
undertaking such other activities as may from time to time be
appropriate to further the purposes and achieve the goals set forth
above.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-29266 Filed 12-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P