Adjustment of Monetary Threshold for Reporting Rail Equipment Accidents/Incidents for Calendar Year 2013, 71354-71356 [2012-28925]
Download as PDF
71354
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 231 / Friday, November 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Carriers that offer subscribers the
option to block third-party charges from
appearing on telephone bills must
clearly and conspicuously notify
subscribers of this option on each
telephone bill.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[CG Docket Nos. 11–116 and 09–158; CC
Docket No. 98–170; FCC 12–42]
Empowering Consumers To Prevent
and Detect Billing for Unauthorized
Charges (‘‘Cramming’’); Consumer
Information and Disclosure; Truth-inBilling Format
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
Administration, Office of Chief Counsel,
RCC–10, Mail Stop 10, West Building
3rd Floor, Room W31–204, 1200 New
Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590
(telephone 202–493–1381).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Communications Commission.
Bulah P. Wheeler,
Associate Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Office of Managing Director.
Background
[FR Doc. 2012–28760 Filed 11–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) is
correcting a final rule that appeared in
the Federal Register of May 24, 2012.
This document corrects rules adopted to
help consumers prevent and detect the
placement of unauthorized charges on
their telephone bills, an unlawful and
fraudulent practice commonly referred
to as ‘‘cramming.’’
DATES: This correction contains
modified information collection
requirements that have not been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). The Commission
will publish a separate document in the
Federal Register announcing the
effective date of this correction.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Conway,
Melissa.Conway@fcc.gov or (202) 418–
2887, of the Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document makes the following
correction to the final rule published
May 24, 2012, at 77 FR 30915:
SUMMARY:
§ 64.2401
[Corrected].
1. On page 30919, in the third column,
in § 64.2401, revise paragraph (f) to read
as follows:
(f) Blocking of third-party charges. (1)
Carriers that offer subscribers the option
to block third-party charges from
appearing on telephone bills must
clearly and conspicuously notify
subscribers of this option at the point of
sale and on each carrier’s Web site.
■
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 225
[FRA–2008–0136, Notice No. 5]
RIN 2130–ZA10
Adjustment of Monetary Threshold for
Reporting Rail Equipment Accidents/
Incidents for Calendar Year 2013
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule increases the rail
equipment accident/incident reporting
threshold from $9,500 to $9,900 for
certain railroad accidents/incidents
involving property damage that occur
during calendar year 2013. This action
is needed to ensure that FRA’s reporting
requirements reflect cost increases that
have occurred since the reporting
threshold was last published in
November of 2011.
DATES: This regulation is effective
January 1, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kebo Chen, Staff Director, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal
Railroad Administration, Office of
Safety Analysis, RRS–22, Mail Stop 25,
West Building 3rd Floor, Room W33–
314, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE.,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202–
493–6079); or Gahan Christenson, Trial
Attorney, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Railroad
SUMMARY:
A ‘‘rail equipment accident/incident’’
is a collision, derailment, fire,
explosion, act of God, or other event
involving the operation of railroad ontrack equipment (standing or moving)
that results in damages to railroad ontrack equipment, signals, tracks, track
structures, or roadbed, including labor
costs and the costs for acquiring new
equipment and material, greater than
the reporting threshold for the year in
which the event occurs. 49 CFR
225.19(c). Each rail equipment accident/
incident must be reported to FRA using
the Rail Equipment Accident/Incident
Report (Form FRA F 6180.54). 49 CFR
225.19(b) and (c). As revised, effective
in 1997, paragraphs (c) and (e) of 49
CFR 225.19 provide that the dollar
figure that constitutes the reporting
threshold for rail equipment accidents/
incidents will be adjusted, if necessary,
every year in accordance with the
procedures outlined in appendix B to
part 225 to reflect any cost increases or
decreases.
New Reporting Threshold
Approximately one year has passed
since the rail equipment accident/
incident reporting threshold was
revised. 76 FR 72850 (November 28,
2011). Consequently, FRA has
recalculated the threshold, as required
by § 225.19(c), based on increased costs
for labor and increased costs for
equipment. FRA has determined that
the current reporting threshold of
$9,500, which applies to rail equipment
accidents/incidents that occur during
calendar year 2012, should increase by
$400 to $9,900 for equipment accidents/
incidents occurring during calendar
year 2013, effective January 1, 2013. The
specific inputs to the equation set forth
in appendix B (i.e., Tnew = Tprior * [1
+ 0.4(Wnew¥Wprior)/Wprior +
0.6(Enew¥Eprior)/100]) to part 225 are:
Wnew
Wprior
Enew
Eprior
$9,500
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Tprior
$25.56943
$24.92646
191.50000
186.36667
Where: Tnew = New threshold; Tprior =
Prior threshold (with reference to
the threshold, ‘‘prior’’ refers to the
previous threshold rounded to the
nearest $100, as reported in the
Federal Register); Wnew = New
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:04 Nov 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
average hourly wage rate, in dollars;
Wprior = Prior average hourly wage
rate, in dollars; Enew = New
equipment average Producer Price
Index (PPI) value; Eprior = Prior
equipment average PPI value. Using
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the above figures, the calculated
new threshold, (Tnew) is $9,890.62,
which is rounded to the nearest
$100 for a final new reporting
threshold of $9,900.
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 231 / Friday, November 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Notice and Comment Procedures
In this rule, FRA has recalculated the
monetary reporting threshold based on
the formula discussed in detail and
adopted, after notice and comment, in
the final rule published December 20,
2005, 70 FR 75414. FRA has found that
both the current cost data inserted into
this pre-existing formula and the
original cost data that they replace were
obtained from reliable Federal
government sources. FRA has found that
this rule imposes no additional burden
on any person, but rather provides a
benefit by permitting the valid
comparison of accident data over time.
Accordingly, finding that notice and
comment procedures are either
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, FRA is proceeding
directly to the final rule.
Regulatory Impact
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This rule has been evaluated in
accordance with existing policies and
procedures, and determined to be nonsignificant under both Executive Order
12866 and 13563 in addition to DOT
policies and procedures (44 FR 11034
(Feb. 26, 1979)).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601–612) requires a review of
proposed and final rules to assess their
impact on small entities, unless the
Secretary certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Pursuant to Section 312 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
FRA has issued a final policy that
formally establishes ‘‘small entities’’ as
including railroads that meet the linehaulage revenue requirements of a Class
III railroad. 49 CFR part 209, app. C. For
other entities, the same dollar limit in
revenues governs whether a railroad,
contractor, or other respondent is a
small entity. Id. About 719 of the
approximately 764 railroads in the
United States are considered small
entities by FRA. FRA certifies that this
final rule will have no significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. To the extent
that this rule has any impact on small
entities, the impact will be neutral or
insignificant.
The frequency of rail equipment
accidents/incidents, and therefore also
the frequency of required reporting, is
generally proportional to the size of the
railroad. A railroad that employs
thousands of employees and operates
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:04 Nov 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
trains millions of miles is exposed to
greater risks than one whose operation
is substantially smaller. Small railroads
may go for months at a time without
having a reportable occurrence of any
type, and even longer without having a
rail equipment accident/incident. For
example, current FRA data indicate that
2,693 rail equipment accidents/
incidents were reported in 2007, with
small railroads reporting 364 of them.
Data for 2008 show that 2,481 rail
equipment accidents/incidents were
reported, with small railroads reporting
294 of them. In 2009, 1,910 rail
equipment accidents/incidents were
reported, and small railroads reported
271 of them. In 2010, 1,902 rail
equipment accidents/incidents were
reported, with small railroads reporting
258 of them. In 2011, 2010 rail
equipment accidents/incidents were
reported, with small railroads reporting
267 of them. On average for those five
calendar years, small railroads reported
about 13% (ranging from 12% to 14%)
of the total number of rail equipment
accidents/incidents. FRA notes that
these data are based on accidents/
incidents reported by railroads with less
than 400,000 employee hours per year.
FRA’s accident reporting regulations
require railroads to report employee
hours; thus for purposes of 49 CFR part
225, FRA has historically categorized
and displayed the data in this manner.
Of the approximately 764 railroads in
the United States, 731 fit into the
category of less than 400,000 employee
hours per year and the characteristics of
such railroads are substantively similar
to railroads otherwise considered small
entities in accordance with FRA’s
policy. Accordingly, because the
number and characteristics of these
railroads are consistent with those
otherwise considered small entities FRA
believes that this approach is
appropriate. FRA notes, however, that
these data are accurate as of the date of
issuance of this final rule, and are
subject to minor changes due to
additional reporting. Absent this
rulemaking (i.e., any increase in the
monetary reporting threshold), the
number of reportable accidents/
incidents would increase, as keeping the
2012 threshold in place would not allow
it to keep pace with the increasing
dollar amounts of wages and rail
equipment repair costs. Therefore, this
rule will be neutral in effect. Increasing
the reporting threshold will slightly
decrease the recordkeeping burden for
railroads over time. Any recordkeeping
burden will not be significant and will
affect the large railroads more than the
small entities, due to the higher
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71355
proportion of reportable rail equipment
accidents/incidents experienced by
large entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
There are no new information
collection requirements associated with
this final rule. Therefore, no estimate of
a public reporting burden is required.
Federalism Implications
Executive Order 13132, entitled,
‘‘Federalism,’’ signed on August 4, 1999,
requires that each agency ‘‘in a
separately identified portion of the
preamble to the regulation as it is to be
issued in the Federal Register, provide[]
to the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget a federalism
summary impact statement, which
consists of a description of the extent of
the agency’s prior consultation with
State and local officials, a summary of
the nature of their concerns and the
agency’s position supporting the need to
issue the regulation, and a statement of
the extent to which the concerns of the
State and local officials have been met
* * *’’ This rulemaking action has been
analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132. This rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and the
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in the
Executive Order 13132. Accordingly,
FRA has determined that this rule will
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant consultation
with State and local officials or the
preparation of a federalism assessment.
Accordingly, a federalism assessment
has not been prepared.
Environmental Impact
FRA has evaluated this regulation in
accordance with its ‘‘Procedures for
Considering Environmental Impacts’’
(FRA’s Procedures) (64 FR 28545 (May
26, 1999)) as required by the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), other environmental
statutes, Executive Orders, and related
regulatory requirements. FRA has
determined that this regulation is not a
major FRA action (requiring the
preparation of an environmental impact
statement or environmental assessment)
because it is categorically excluded from
detailed environmental review pursuant
to section 4(c)(20) of FRA’s Procedures.
64 FR 28545, 28547 (May 26, 1999). In
accordance with section 4(c) and (e) of
FRA’s Procedures, the agency has
further concluded that no extraordinary
circumstances exist with respect to this
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
71356
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 231 / Friday, November 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
regulation that might trigger the need for
a more detailed environmental review.
As a result, FRA finds that this
regulation is not a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Pursuant to Section 201 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4, 2 U.S.C. 1531), each
Federal agency ‘‘shall, unless otherwise
prohibited by law, assess the effects of
Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments, and the
private sector (other than to the extent
that such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in
law).’’ Section 202 of the Act (2 U.S.C.
1532) further requires that ‘‘before
promulgating any general notice of
proposed rulemaking that is likely to
result in the promulgation of any rule
that includes any Federal mandate that
may result in expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) [currently
$143,100,000] in any one year, and
before promulgating any final rule for
which a general notice of proposed
rulemaking was published, the agency
shall prepare a written statement’’
detailing the effect on State, local, and
tribal governments and the private
sector. The final rule will not result in
the expenditure, in the aggregate, of
$143,100,000 or more in any one year,
and thus preparation of such a
statement is not required.
Energy Impact
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Executive Order 13211 requires
Federal agencies to prepare a Statement
of Energy Effects for any ‘‘significant
energy action.’’ 66 FR 28355 (May 22,
2001). Under the Executive Order, a
‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined as
any action by an agency (normally
published in the Federal Register) that
promulgates or is expected to lead to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:04 Nov 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
promulgation of a final rule or
regulation, including notices of inquiry,
advance notices of proposed
rulemaking, and notices of proposed
rulemaking: That (1)(i) is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 or any successor order, and (ii) is
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy; or (2) that is designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. FRA has
evaluated this final rule in accordance
with Executive Order 13211. FRA has
determined that this final rule is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Consequently, FRA has
determined that this regulatory action is
not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ within
the meaning of Executive Order 13211.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). See https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice
for the privacy notice of regulations.gov
or interested parties may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 225
Investigations, Penalties, Railroad
safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The Rule
In consideration of the foregoing, FRA
amends part 225 of chapter II, subtitle
B of title 49, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 225—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 225
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 103, 322(a), 20103,
20107, 20901–02, 21301, 21302, 21311; 28
U.S.C. 2461, note; and 49 CFR 1.49.
2. Amend § 225.19 by revising the first
sentence of paragraph (c) and revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 225.19 Primary groups of accidents/
incidents.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Group II—Rail equipment. Rail
equipment accidents/incidents are
collisions, derailments, fires,
explosions, acts of God, and other
events involving the operation of ontrack equipment (standing or moving)
that result in damages higher than the
current reporting threshold (i.e., $6,700
for calendar years 2002 through 2005,
$7,700 for calendar year 2006, $8,200
for calendar year 2007, $8,500 for
calendar year 2008, $8,900 for calendar
year 2009, $9,200 for calendar year
2010, $9,400 for calendar year 2011,
$9,500 for calendar year 2012, and
$9,900 for calendar year 2013) to
railroad on-track equipment, signals,
tracks, track structures, or roadbed,
including labor costs and the costs for
acquiring new equipment and material.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The reporting threshold is $6,700
for calendar years 2002 through 2005,
$7,700 for calendar year 2006, $8,200
for calendar year 2007, $8,500 for
calendar year 2008, $8,900 for calendar
year 2009, $9,200 for calendar year
2010, $9,400 for calendar year 2011,
$9,500 for calendar year 2012 and
$9,900 for calendar year 2013. The
procedure for determining the reporting
threshold for calendar years 2006 and
beyond appears as paragraphs 1–8 of
appendix B to part 225.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
26, 2012.
Melissa L. Porter,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012–28925 Filed 11–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 231 (Friday, November 30, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71354-71356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28925]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 225
[FRA-2008-0136, Notice No. 5]
RIN 2130-ZA10
Adjustment of Monetary Threshold for Reporting Rail Equipment
Accidents/Incidents for Calendar Year 2013
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule increases the rail equipment accident/incident
reporting threshold from $9,500 to $9,900 for certain railroad
accidents/incidents involving property damage that occur during
calendar year 2013. This action is needed to ensure that FRA's
reporting requirements reflect cost increases that have occurred since
the reporting threshold was last published in November of 2011.
DATES: This regulation is effective January 1, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kebo Chen, Staff Director, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Office
of Safety Analysis, RRS-22, Mail Stop 25, West Building 3rd Floor, Room
W33-314, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202-
493-6079); or Gahan Christenson, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Chief
Counsel, RCC-10, Mail Stop 10, West Building 3rd Floor, Room W31-204,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202-493-
1381).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
A ``rail equipment accident/incident'' is a collision, derailment,
fire, explosion, act of God, or other event involving the operation of
railroad on-track equipment (standing or moving) that results in
damages to railroad on-track equipment, signals, tracks, track
structures, or roadbed, including labor costs and the costs for
acquiring new equipment and material, greater than the reporting
threshold for the year in which the event occurs. 49 CFR 225.19(c).
Each rail equipment accident/incident must be reported to FRA using the
Rail Equipment Accident/Incident Report (Form FRA F 6180.54). 49 CFR
225.19(b) and (c). As revised, effective in 1997, paragraphs (c) and
(e) of 49 CFR 225.19 provide that the dollar figure that constitutes
the reporting threshold for rail equipment accidents/incidents will be
adjusted, if necessary, every year in accordance with the procedures
outlined in appendix B to part 225 to reflect any cost increases or
decreases.
New Reporting Threshold
Approximately one year has passed since the rail equipment
accident/incident reporting threshold was revised. 76 FR 72850
(November 28, 2011). Consequently, FRA has recalculated the threshold,
as required by Sec. 225.19(c), based on increased costs for labor and
increased costs for equipment. FRA has determined that the current
reporting threshold of $9,500, which applies to rail equipment
accidents/incidents that occur during calendar year 2012, should
increase by $400 to $9,900 for equipment accidents/incidents occurring
during calendar year 2013, effective January 1, 2013. The specific
inputs to the equation set forth in appendix B (i.e., Tnew = Tprior *
[1 + 0.4(Wnew-Wprior)/Wprior + 0.6(Enew-Eprior)/100]) to part 225 are:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tprior Wnew Wprior Enew Eprior
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$9,500 $25.56943 $24.92646 191.50000 186.36667
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where: Tnew = New threshold; Tprior = Prior threshold (with reference
to the threshold, ``prior'' refers to the previous threshold rounded to
the nearest $100, as reported in the Federal Register); Wnew = New
average hourly wage rate, in dollars; Wprior = Prior average hourly
wage rate, in dollars; Enew = New equipment average Producer Price
Index (PPI) value; Eprior = Prior equipment average PPI value. Using
the above figures, the calculated new threshold, (Tnew) is $9,890.62,
which is rounded to the nearest $100 for a final new reporting
threshold of $9,900.
[[Page 71355]]
Notice and Comment Procedures
In this rule, FRA has recalculated the monetary reporting threshold
based on the formula discussed in detail and adopted, after notice and
comment, in the final rule published December 20, 2005, 70 FR 75414.
FRA has found that both the current cost data inserted into this pre-
existing formula and the original cost data that they replace were
obtained from reliable Federal government sources. FRA has found that
this rule imposes no additional burden on any person, but rather
provides a benefit by permitting the valid comparison of accident data
over time. Accordingly, finding that notice and comment procedures are
either impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest,
FRA is proceeding directly to the final rule.
Regulatory Impact
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
This rule has been evaluated in accordance with existing policies
and procedures, and determined to be non-significant under both
Executive Order 12866 and 13563 in addition to DOT policies and
procedures (44 FR 11034 (Feb. 26, 1979)).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601-612) requires
a review of proposed and final rules to assess their impact on small
entities, unless the Secretary certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Pursuant to Section 312 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), FRA has issued a final policy
that formally establishes ``small entities'' as including railroads
that meet the line-haulage revenue requirements of a Class III
railroad. 49 CFR part 209, app. C. For other entities, the same dollar
limit in revenues governs whether a railroad, contractor, or other
respondent is a small entity. Id. About 719 of the approximately 764
railroads in the United States are considered small entities by FRA.
FRA certifies that this final rule will have no significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. To the extent that
this rule has any impact on small entities, the impact will be neutral
or insignificant.
The frequency of rail equipment accidents/incidents, and therefore
also the frequency of required reporting, is generally proportional to
the size of the railroad. A railroad that employs thousands of
employees and operates trains millions of miles is exposed to greater
risks than one whose operation is substantially smaller. Small
railroads may go for months at a time without having a reportable
occurrence of any type, and even longer without having a rail equipment
accident/incident. For example, current FRA data indicate that 2,693
rail equipment accidents/incidents were reported in 2007, with small
railroads reporting 364 of them. Data for 2008 show that 2,481 rail
equipment accidents/incidents were reported, with small railroads
reporting 294 of them. In 2009, 1,910 rail equipment accidents/
incidents were reported, and small railroads reported 271 of them. In
2010, 1,902 rail equipment accidents/incidents were reported, with
small railroads reporting 258 of them. In 2011, 2010 rail equipment
accidents/incidents were reported, with small railroads reporting 267
of them. On average for those five calendar years, small railroads
reported about 13% (ranging from 12% to 14%) of the total number of
rail equipment accidents/incidents. FRA notes that these data are based
on accidents/incidents reported by railroads with less than 400,000
employee hours per year. FRA's accident reporting regulations require
railroads to report employee hours; thus for purposes of 49 CFR part
225, FRA has historically categorized and displayed the data in this
manner. Of the approximately 764 railroads in the United States, 731
fit into the category of less than 400,000 employee hours per year and
the characteristics of such railroads are substantively similar to
railroads otherwise considered small entities in accordance with FRA's
policy. Accordingly, because the number and characteristics of these
railroads are consistent with those otherwise considered small entities
FRA believes that this approach is appropriate. FRA notes, however,
that these data are accurate as of the date of issuance of this final
rule, and are subject to minor changes due to additional reporting.
Absent this rulemaking (i.e., any increase in the monetary reporting
threshold), the number of reportable accidents/incidents would
increase, as keeping the 2012 threshold in place would not allow it to
keep pace with the increasing dollar amounts of wages and rail
equipment repair costs. Therefore, this rule will be neutral in effect.
Increasing the reporting threshold will slightly decrease the
recordkeeping burden for railroads over time. Any recordkeeping burden
will not be significant and will affect the large railroads more than
the small entities, due to the higher proportion of reportable rail
equipment accidents/incidents experienced by large entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
There are no new information collection requirements associated
with this final rule. Therefore, no estimate of a public reporting
burden is required.
Federalism Implications
Executive Order 13132, entitled, ``Federalism,'' signed on August
4, 1999, requires that each agency ``in a separately identified portion
of the preamble to the regulation as it is to be issued in the Federal
Register, provide[] to the Director of the Office of Management and
Budget a federalism summary impact statement, which consists of a
description of the extent of the agency's prior consultation with State
and local officials, a summary of the nature of their concerns and the
agency's position supporting the need to issue the regulation, and a
statement of the extent to which the concerns of the State and local
officials have been met * * *'' This rulemaking action has been
analyzed in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132. This rule will not have a substantial direct
effect on States, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States, or on the distribution of power and the
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in the Executive Order 13132. Accordingly, FRA has determined that this
rule will not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
consultation with State and local officials or the preparation of a
federalism assessment. Accordingly, a federalism assessment has not
been prepared.
Environmental Impact
FRA has evaluated this regulation in accordance with its
``Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts'' (FRA's Procedures)
(64 FR 28545 (May 26, 1999)) as required by the National Environmental
Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), other environmental statutes,
Executive Orders, and related regulatory requirements. FRA has
determined that this regulation is not a major FRA action (requiring
the preparation of an environmental impact statement or environmental
assessment) because it is categorically excluded from detailed
environmental review pursuant to section 4(c)(20) of FRA's Procedures.
64 FR 28545, 28547 (May 26, 1999). In accordance with section 4(c) and
(e) of FRA's Procedures, the agency has further concluded that no
extraordinary circumstances exist with respect to this
[[Page 71356]]
regulation that might trigger the need for a more detailed
environmental review. As a result, FRA finds that this regulation is
not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Pursuant to Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4, 2 U.S.C. 1531), each Federal agency ``shall, unless
otherwise prohibited by law, assess the effects of Federal regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal governments, and the private sector
(other than to the extent that such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in law).'' Section 202 of the Act
(2 U.S.C. 1532) further requires that ``before promulgating any general
notice of proposed rulemaking that is likely to result in the
promulgation of any rule that includes any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) [currently $143,100,000] in any one year, and
before promulgating any final rule for which a general notice of
proposed rulemaking was published, the agency shall prepare a written
statement'' detailing the effect on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. The final rule will not result in
the expenditure, in the aggregate, of $143,100,000 or more in any one
year, and thus preparation of such a statement is not required.
Energy Impact
Executive Order 13211 requires Federal agencies to prepare a
Statement of Energy Effects for any ``significant energy action.'' 66
FR 28355 (May 22, 2001). Under the Executive Order, a ``significant
energy action'' is defined as any action by an agency (normally
published in the Federal Register) that promulgates or is expected to
lead to the promulgation of a final rule or regulation, including
notices of inquiry, advance notices of proposed rulemaking, and notices
of proposed rulemaking: That (1)(i) is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 or any successor order, and (ii) is likely
to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or
use of energy; or (2) that is designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. FRA has evaluated this final rule in accordance with Executive
Order 13211. FRA has determined that this final rule is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. Consequently, FRA has determined that this regulatory action
is not a ``significant energy action'' within the meaning of Executive
Order 13211.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
See https://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice for the privacy notice
of regulations.gov or interested parties may review DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 225
Investigations, Penalties, Railroad safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
The Rule
In consideration of the foregoing, FRA amends part 225 of chapter
II, subtitle B of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 225--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 225 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 103, 322(a), 20103, 20107, 20901-02,
21301, 21302, 21311; 28 U.S.C. 2461, note; and 49 CFR 1.49.
0
2. Amend Sec. 225.19 by revising the first sentence of paragraph (c)
and revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 225.19 Primary groups of accidents/incidents.
* * * * *
(c) Group II--Rail equipment. Rail equipment accidents/incidents
are collisions, derailments, fires, explosions, acts of God, and other
events involving the operation of on-track equipment (standing or
moving) that result in damages higher than the current reporting
threshold (i.e., $6,700 for calendar years 2002 through 2005, $7,700
for calendar year 2006, $8,200 for calendar year 2007, $8,500 for
calendar year 2008, $8,900 for calendar year 2009, $9,200 for calendar
year 2010, $9,400 for calendar year 2011, $9,500 for calendar year
2012, and $9,900 for calendar year 2013) to railroad on-track
equipment, signals, tracks, track structures, or roadbed, including
labor costs and the costs for acquiring new equipment and material. * *
*
* * * * *
(e) The reporting threshold is $6,700 for calendar years 2002
through 2005, $7,700 for calendar year 2006, $8,200 for calendar year
2007, $8,500 for calendar year 2008, $8,900 for calendar year 2009,
$9,200 for calendar year 2010, $9,400 for calendar year 2011, $9,500
for calendar year 2012 and $9,900 for calendar year 2013. The procedure
for determining the reporting threshold for calendar years 2006 and
beyond appears as paragraphs 1-8 of appendix B to part 225.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 26, 2012.
Melissa L. Porter,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-28925 Filed 11-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P