Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans; Valuation of Benefits and Assets; Expected Retirement Age, 71321-71323 [2012-28892]

Download as PDF 71321 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 231 / Friday, November 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 1. Memorandum for FAP 9M4696 from K. Morehouse, FDA, to L. Highbarger, FDA, dated August 10, 2010.* 2. Diehl, J. F., ‘‘Chemical Effects of Ionizing Radiation,’’ pp. 43–88, in Safety of Irradiated Foods, second edition, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1995. 3. Memorandum for FAP 9M4696 from E. Jensen, FDA, to R. Alrefai, FDA, dated December 10, 1999.* 4. Elias, P.S. and A.J. Cohen, ‘‘Recent Advances in Food Irradiation,’’ Elsevier Biomedical, Amsterdam, 1983. 5. World Health Organization, ‘‘High-Dose Irradiation: Wholesomeness of Food Irradiated With Doses Above 10 kGy,’’ World Health Organization Technical Report Series No. 890, pp. 9–37, Geneva, 1999. 6. Preservation of Food by Ionizing Radiation, edited by E.S. Josephson and M.S. Peterson, Vol. II, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1982. 7. Diehl, J.F., ‘‘Radiolytic Effects in Foods,’’ pp. 279–357, in Preservation of Food By Ionizing Radiation, Vol. I, edited by E.S. Josephson and M.S. Peterson, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1982. 8. Crone, A.V.J., et al., ‘‘Effect of Storage and Cooking on the Dose Response of 2Dodecylcyclobutanone, a Potential Marker for Irradiated Chicken,’’ Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 58:249–252, 1992. 9. Gadgil, P., K.A. Hachmeister, J.S. Smith, and D.H. Kropf, ‘‘2-Alkylcyclobutanones as Irradiation Dose Indicators in Irradiated Ground Beef Patties,’’ Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 50:5746–5750, 2002. 10. Seibersdorf Project Report, International Programme on Irradiation of Fruit and Fruit Juices, Chemistry and Isotopes Department, National Centre for Nuclear Energy, Madrid, Spain, Vol. 8, 1966. 11. Memorandum for FAP 9M4697 from K. Morehouse, FDA, to L. Highbarger, FDA, dated February 20, 2008. * 12. Locas, C. and V.A. Yaylayan, ‘‘Origin and Mechanistic Pathways of Formation of the Parent Furan—a Toxicant.,’’ Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52:6830–6836, 2005. 13. Fan, X., and K.J.B. Sokorai, ‘‘Effect of Ionizing Radiation on Furan Formation in Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables.’’ Journal of Food Science. 73(2):C79–C83, 2008. 14. Memorandum from Food Additives Evaluation Branch, FDA (HFS–156), to C. Takaguchi, Petition Control Branch, FDA, December 28, 1982.* 15. Memorandum to the file for FAP 4M4428, from D. Hattan, FDA, dated November 18, 1997.* 16. Underdal, B., J. Nordal, G. Lunde, and B. Eggum, ‘‘The Effect of Ionizing Radiation on the Nutritional Value of Fish (Cod) Protein,’’ Lebensmittel Wissenschaft Technologie, 6:90–93, 1973. 17. Diehl, J.F., ‘‘Nutritional Adequacy of Irradiated Foods,’’ pp. 241–282, in Safety of Irradiated Foods, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995. 18. Internal Memorandum for FAP 9M4696 from J. Newland, FDA, to the file, dated July 7, 2000.* 19. Firstenberg-Eden, R., D.B. Rowley, and G.E. Shattuck. ‘‘Factors Affecting Growth and Toxin Production by Clostidium Botulinum Type E on Irradiated (0.3 Mrad) Chicken Skins.’’ Journal of Food Protection, 47:867–870, 1982. 20. Matilla-Sandholm, T. and E. Skytta. ‘‘The Effect of Spoilage Flora on the Growth of Food Pathogens in Minced Meat Stored at Chilled Temperature.’’ LebensmittelWissenschaft Technologie, 24:116–120, 1991. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 179 Food additives, Food labeling, Food packaging, Radiation protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Signs and symbols. Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 179 is amended as follows: PART 179—IRRADIATION IN THE PRODUCTION, PROCESSING AND HANDLING OF FOOD 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 179 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 342, 343, 348, 373, 374. 2. Section 179.26 is amended in the table in paragraph (b) by revising entry ‘‘6.’’ under the headings ‘‘Use’’ and ‘‘Limitations’’ to read as follows: ■ § 179.26 Ionizing radiation for the treatment of food. * * * (b) * * * * * Use Limitations * * * * * * 6. For control of food-borne pathogens in fresh (refrigerated or unrefrigerated) or frozen, uncooked poultry products that are: (1) Whole carcasses or disjointed portions (or other parts) of such carcasses that are ‘‘ready-tocook poultry’’ within the meaning of 9 CFR 381.l(b) (with or without nonfluid seasoning; includes, e.g., ground poultry), or (2) mechanically separated poultry product (a finely comminuted ingredient produced by the mechanical deboning of poultry carcasses or parts of carcasses). * Not to exceed 4.5 kGy for non-frozen products; not to exceed 7.0 kGy for frozen products. * * * * * * * * ACTION: Dated: November 27, 2012. Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. BILLING CODE 4160–01–P PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with 29 CFR Part 4044 Allocation of Assets in SingleEmployer Plans; Valuation of Benefits and Assets; Expected Retirement Age Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. AGENCY: 14:04 Nov 29, 2012 Jkt 229001 * Final rule. This rule amends the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s regulation on Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans by substituting a new table for determining expected retirement ages for participants in pension plans undergoing distress or involuntary termination with valuation dates falling in 2013. This table is needed in order to compute the value of early retirement benefits and, thus, the total value of benefits under a plan. DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine B. Klion, Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K SUMMARY: [FR Doc. 2012–28968 Filed 11–29–12; 8:45 am] VerDate Mar<15>2010 * PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * * Street NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202–326–4024. (TTY/TDD users may call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be connected to 202–326–4024.) The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) administers the pension plan termination insurance program under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). PBGC’s regulation on Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans (29 CFR part 4044) sets forth (in subpart B) the methods for valuing plan benefits of terminating single-employer plans covered under Title IV. Guaranteed benefits and benefit liabilities under a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM 30NOR1 71322 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 231 / Friday, November 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations plan that is undergoing a distress termination must be valued in accordance with subpart B of part 4044. In addition, when PBGC terminates an underfunded plan involuntarily pursuant to ERISA section 4042(a), it uses the subpart B valuation rules to determine the amount of the plan’s underfunding. Under § 4044.51(b) of the asset allocation regulation, early retirement benefits are valued based on the annuity starting date, if a retirement date has been selected, or the expected retirement age, if the annuity starting date is not known on the valuation date. Sections 4044.55 through 4044.57 set forth rules for determining the expected retirement ages for plan participants entitled to early retirement benefits. Appendix D of part 4044 contains tables to be used in determining the expected early retirement ages. Table I in appendix D (Selection of Retirement Rate Category) is used to determine whether a participant has a low, medium, or high probability of retiring early. The determination is based on the year a participant would reach ‘‘unreduced retirement age’’ (i.e., the earlier of the normal retirement age or the age at which an unreduced benefit is first payable) and the participant’s monthly benefit at unreduced retirement age. The table applies only to plans with valuation dates in the current year and is updated annually by the PBGC to reflect changes in the cost of living, etc. Tables II–A, II–B, and II–C (Expected Retirement Ages for Individuals in the Low, Medium, and High Categories respectively) are used to determine the expected retirement age after the probability of early retirement has been determined using Table I. These tables establish, by probability category, the expected retirement age based on both the earliest age a participant could retire under the plan and the unreduced retirement age. This expected retirement age is used to compute the value of the early retirement benefit and, thus, the total value of benefits under the plan. This document amends appendix D to replace Table I–12 with Table I–13 in order to provide an updated correlation, appropriate for calendar year 2013, between the amount of a participant’s benefit and the probability that the participant will elect early retirement. Table I–13 will be used to value benefits in plans with valuation dates during calendar year 2013. PBGC has determined that notice of and public comment on this rule are impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Plan administrators need to be able to estimate accurately the value of plan benefits as early as possible before initiating the termination process. For that purpose, if a plan has a valuation date in 2013, the plan administrator needs the updated table being promulgated in this rule. Accordingly, the public interest is best served by issuing this table expeditiously, without an opportunity for notice and comment, to allow as much time as possible to estimate the value of plan benefits with the proper table for plans with valuation dates in early 2013. PBGC has determined that this action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under the criteria set forth in Executive Order 12866. Because no general notice of proposed rulemaking is required for this regulation, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply (5 U.S.C. 601(2)). List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 4044 Pension insurance, Pensions. In consideration of the foregoing, 29 CFR part 4044 is amended as follows: PART 4044—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 4044 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301(a), 1302(b)(3), 1341, 1344, 1362. 2. Appendix D to part 4044 is amended by removing Table I–12 and adding in its place Table I–13 to read as follows: ■ Appendix D to Part 4044—Tables Used To Determine Expected Retirement Age TABLE I–13—SELECTION OF RETIREMENT RATE CATEGORY [For plans with valuation dates after December 31, 2012, and before January 1, 2014] Participant’s retirement rate category is— Low 1 if monthly benefit at URA is less than— If participant reaches URA in year— 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. or later .................................................................................................... 1 Table 2 Table wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with 3 Table Medium 2 if monthly benefit at URA is— From— 599 611 623 636 649 663 677 691 706 720 To— 599 611 623 636 649 663 677 691 706 720 II–A. II–B. II–C. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:04 Nov 29, 2012 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM High 3 if monthly benefit at URA is greater than— 30NOR1 2,531 2,582 2,633 2,688 2,745 2,803 2,861 2,922 2,983 3,046 2,531 2,582 2,633 2,688 2,745 2,803 2,861 2,922 2,983 3,046 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 231 / Friday, November 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations * * * * * Issued in Washington, DC, this 20th day of November, 2012. Laricke Blanchard, Deputy Director for Policy, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. [FR Doc. 2012–28892 Filed 11–29–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7709–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 60 and 63 [EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0234; EPA–HQ–OAR– 2011–0044; FRL–9733–2] RIN 2060–AR62 Reconsideration of Certain New Source and Startup/Shutdown Issues: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Coaland Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-CommercialInstitutional, and Small IndustrialCommercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rules; notice of public hearing. AGENCY: On February 16, 2012, pursuant to sections 111 and 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA published the final rules titled ‘‘National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal- and Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-CommercialInstitutional, and Small IndustrialCommercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units.’’ The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) rule issued pursuant to CAA section 112 is referred to as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), and the New Source Performance Standards rule issued pursuant to CAA section 111 is referred to as the Utility NSPS. The Administrator received petitions for reconsideration of certain aspects of MATS and the Utility NSPS. In this notice, the EPA is announcing reconsideration of certain new source standards for MATS, the requirements applicable during periods of startup and shutdown for MATS, the startup and shutdown provisions related to the particulate matter (PM) standard in the Utility NSPS, and certain revisions to the definitional and monitoring provisions of the Utility NSPS. We are wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:04 Nov 29, 2012 Jkt 229001 also proposing certain technical corrections to both MATS and the Utility NSPS. We seek comment only on the aspects of the final MATS and Utility NSPS rules specifically identified in this notice. We are not opening for reconsideration any other provisions of MATS or the Utility NSPS at this time. DATES: Comments. Comments must be received on or before December 31, 2012. Because of the need to resolve the issues identified in this notice in a timely manner, the EPA does not intend to grant requests for extensions beyond this date. Public Hearing. If anyone contacts the EPA by December 10, 2012 requesting to speak at a public hearing, the EPA will hold a public hearing on December 18, 2012. If a public hearing is held, it will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Eastern time, in Room 1153 EPA East Hearing room, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564–1657. For further information on the public hearing and requests to speak, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. ADDRESSES: Comments. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID. No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0044 (NSPS action) or Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OAR–2009–0234 (NESHAP/MATS action), by one of the following methods: • https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • https://www.epa.gov/oar/ docket.html. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the EPA Air and Radiation Docket Web Site. • Email: Comments may be sent by electronic mail (email) to a-and-rdocket@epa.gov, Attention EPA–HQ– OAR–2011–0044 (NSPS action) or EPA– HQ–OAR–2009–0234 (NESHAP/MATS action). • Fax: Fax your comments to: (202) 566–9744, Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OAR–2011–0044 (NSPS action) or Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009– 0234 (NESHAP/MATS action). • Mail: Send your comments on the NESHAP/MATS action to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0234. Send your comments on the NSPS action to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, Docket ID. EPA– HQ–OAR–2011–0044. Please include a total of two copies. In addition, please PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 71323 mail a copy of your comments on the information collection provisions to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th St. NW., Washington, DC 20503. • Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to: EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total of two copies. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holiday), and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. Instructions. All submissions must include agency name and respective docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. All comments will be posted without change and may be made available online at https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https:// www.regulations.gov or email. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means the EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA without going through https:// www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Public Hearing. If anyone contacts EPA by December 10, 2012 requesting to speak at a public hearing, the EPA will hold a public hearing on December 18, 2012. If a public hearing is held, it will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Eastern time in Room 1153 EPA East Hearing room, 1201 Constitution E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM 30NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 231 (Friday, November 30, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71321-71323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28892]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION

29 CFR Part 4044


Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans; Valuation of 
Benefits and Assets; Expected Retirement Age

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's 
regulation on Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans by 
substituting a new table for determining expected retirement ages for 
participants in pension plans undergoing distress or involuntary 
termination with valuation dates falling in 2013. This table is needed 
in order to compute the value of early retirement benefits and, thus, 
the total value of benefits under a plan.

DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine B. Klion, Assistant General 
Counsel for Regulatory Affairs, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 
1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202-326-4024. (TTY/TDD users 
may call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask 
to be connected to 202-326-4024.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 
(PBGC) administers the pension plan termination insurance program under 
Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
(ERISA). PBGC's regulation on Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer 
Plans (29 CFR part 4044) sets forth (in subpart B) the methods for 
valuing plan benefits of terminating single-employer plans covered 
under Title IV. Guaranteed benefits and benefit liabilities under a

[[Page 71322]]

plan that is undergoing a distress termination must be valued in 
accordance with subpart B of part 4044. In addition, when PBGC 
terminates an underfunded plan involuntarily pursuant to ERISA section 
4042(a), it uses the subpart B valuation rules to determine the amount 
of the plan's underfunding.
    Under Sec.  4044.51(b) of the asset allocation regulation, early 
retirement benefits are valued based on the annuity starting date, if a 
retirement date has been selected, or the expected retirement age, if 
the annuity starting date is not known on the valuation date. Sections 
4044.55 through 4044.57 set forth rules for determining the expected 
retirement ages for plan participants entitled to early retirement 
benefits. Appendix D of part 4044 contains tables to be used in 
determining the expected early retirement ages.
    Table I in appendix D (Selection of Retirement Rate Category) is 
used to determine whether a participant has a low, medium, or high 
probability of retiring early. The determination is based on the year a 
participant would reach ``unreduced retirement age'' (i.e., the earlier 
of the normal retirement age or the age at which an unreduced benefit 
is first payable) and the participant's monthly benefit at unreduced 
retirement age. The table applies only to plans with valuation dates in 
the current year and is updated annually by the PBGC to reflect changes 
in the cost of living, etc.
    Tables II-A, II-B, and II-C (Expected Retirement Ages for 
Individuals in the Low, Medium, and High Categories respectively) are 
used to determine the expected retirement age after the probability of 
early retirement has been determined using Table I. These tables 
establish, by probability category, the expected retirement age based 
on both the earliest age a participant could retire under the plan and 
the unreduced retirement age. This expected retirement age is used to 
compute the value of the early retirement benefit and, thus, the total 
value of benefits under the plan.
    This document amends appendix D to replace Table I-12 with Table I-
13 in order to provide an updated correlation, appropriate for calendar 
year 2013, between the amount of a participant's benefit and the 
probability that the participant will elect early retirement. Table I-
13 will be used to value benefits in plans with valuation dates during 
calendar year 2013.
    PBGC has determined that notice of and public comment on this rule 
are impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Plan 
administrators need to be able to estimate accurately the value of plan 
benefits as early as possible before initiating the termination 
process. For that purpose, if a plan has a valuation date in 2013, the 
plan administrator needs the updated table being promulgated in this 
rule. Accordingly, the public interest is best served by issuing this 
table expeditiously, without an opportunity for notice and comment, to 
allow as much time as possible to estimate the value of plan benefits 
with the proper table for plans with valuation dates in early 2013.
    PBGC has determined that this action is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under the criteria set forth in Executive Order 
12866.
    Because no general notice of proposed rulemaking is required for 
this regulation, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply 
(5 U.S.C. 601(2)).

List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 4044

    Pension insurance, Pensions.

    In consideration of the foregoing, 29 CFR part 4044 is amended as 
follows:

PART 4044--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 4044 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  29 U.S.C. 1301(a), 1302(b)(3), 1341, 1344, 1362.


0
2. Appendix D to part 4044 is amended by removing Table I-12 and adding 
in its place Table I-13 to read as follows:

Appendix D to Part 4044--Tables Used To Determine Expected Retirement 
Age

                                Table I-13--Selection of Retirement Rate Category
              [For plans with valuation dates after December 31, 2012, and before January 1, 2014]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Participant's retirement rate category is--
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Medium \2\ if monthly benefit    High \3\ if
      If participant reaches URA in year--          Low \1\ if              at URA is--               monthly
                                                      monthly    -------------------------------- benefit at URA
                                                  benefit at URA                                    is greater
                                                  is less than--      From--           To--           than--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014............................................             599             599           2,531           2,531
2015............................................             611             611           2,582           2,582
2016............................................             623             623           2,633           2,633
2017............................................             636             636           2,688           2,688
2018............................................             649             649           2,745           2,745
2019............................................             663             663           2,803           2,803
2020............................................             677             677           2,861           2,861
2021............................................             691             691           2,922           2,922
2022............................................             706             706           2,983           2,983
2023 or later...................................             720             720           3,046           3,046
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Table II-A.
\2\ Table II-B.
\3\ Table II-C.


[[Page 71323]]

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, this 20th day of November, 2012.
Laricke Blanchard,
Deputy Director for Policy, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2012-28892 Filed 11-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.