2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria, 71191-71192 [2012-28909]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 230 / Thursday, November 29, 2012 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–OW–2011–0466; FRL 9756–2]
2012 Recreational Water Quality
Criteria
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of the 2012
Recreational Water Quality Criteria.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to section 304(a) of
the Clean Water Act (CWA), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is announcing the availability of the
2012 Recreational Water Quality
Criteria (RWQC). The document
contains the EPA’s recreational water
quality criteria recommendations for
protecting human health in ambient
waters that are designated for primary
contact recreation. CWA Section 304(a)
water quality criteria recommendations
are intended as guidance to States and
authorized Tribes in developing water
quality standards. The 2012 RWQC
document describes the relevant
scientific findings, explains how these
findings were used to derive criteria for
two indicators of fecal contamination
(enterrococcus and E. coli) as measured
by culture based test methods. On
December 21, 2011, EPA made available
draft national recommended
recreational water quality criteria (2011
Draft RWQC) and provided the public
an opportunity to provide scientific
views.
The 2012 RWQC differs from the
current 1986 Ambient Water Quality
Criteria in the following ways: the EPA
recommends States use one of two sets
of criteria values, and no longer
recommends multiple ‘‘use intensity’’
values; the RWQC consist of both a
geometric mean (GM) and a Statistical
Threshold Value (STV); the RWQC are
now comprised of a magnitude, a
duration, and frequency of excursion for
the GM and STV; the EPA introduces a
rapid analytical technique for beach
monitoring, quantitative polymerase
chain reaction (qPCR), for the detection
of enterococci in recreational water
(EPA Method 1611; the EPA provides
information on tools for evaluating and
managing recreational waters, such as
predictive modeling; the EPA is
providing a beach action value for use
in beach notification programs; and the
EPA is providing tools for developing
site-specific criteria.
The CWA, as amended by the Beaches
Environmental Assessment and Coastal
Health (BEACH) Act of 2000, directed
the EPA to conduct studies associated
with pathogens and human health
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Nov 28, 2012
Jkt 229001
under section 104(v), and to publish
new or revised criteria for pathogens
and pathogen indicators based on those
studies under section 304(a)(9). The
criteria announced today are the new or
revised criteria that EPA is directed to
publish under section 304(a)(9) of the
CWA, as amended by the BEACH Act.
ADDRESSES: The draft 2011 and final
2012 RWQC documents, as well as the
scientific views received from the
public on the draft 2011 RWQC, are
available from the EPA Docket Center
and are identified by Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0466. They may be
accessed online at:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions.
• Email: OW-Docket@epa.gov.
• Mail: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency; EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC) Water Docket, MC 28221T;
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
• On Site: EPA Docket Center, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., EPA West,
Room 3334, Washington, DC. This
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
until 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the Office of Water is (202)
566–2426.
For additional information about
EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions concerning the science
supporting these criteria, contact Sharon
Nappier, Health and Ecological Criteria
Division (4304T),
nappier.sharon@epa.gov, U.S. EPA,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; (202) 566–0740.
For questions concerning the use of
EPA’s criteria recommendations, contact
Tracy Bone, Standards and Health
Protection Division (4305T),
bone.tracy@epa.gov, U.S. EPA, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460; (202) 564–5257.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What are section 304(a) water quality
criteria?
Section 304(a) water quality criteria
are recommendations developed by EPA
under authority of section 304(a) of the
Clean Water Act based on the latest
scientific information on the
relationship that the effect of a
constituent concentration has on
particular aquatic species and/or human
health. Section 304(a)(1) of the Clean
Water Act directs the EPA to develop
and publish and, from time to time,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71191
revise, criteria for water quality
accurately reflecting the latest scientific
knowledge. Water quality criteria
developed under section 304(a) are
based solely on data and scientific
judgments on the relationship between
pollutant concentrations and
environmental and human health
effects. Section 304(a) criteria do not
reflect consideration of economic
impacts or the technological feasibility
of meeting pollutant concentrations in
ambient water.
Section 304(a) criteria provide
guidance to States and authorized
Tribes in adopting water quality
standards that ultimately provide a basis
for controlling discharges or releases of
pollutants. The criteria also provide
guidance to the EPA when promulgating
Federal regulations under section 303(c)
when such action is necessary. Under
the CWA and its implementing
regulations, States and authorized
Tribes are to adopt water quality criteria
to protect designated uses (e.g., aquatic
life, recreational use). States and
authorized Tribes may adopt other
scientifically defensible water quality
criteria that differ from these
recommendations. When adopting new
or revised water quality standards, the
States and authorized Tribes must adopt
criteria that are scientifically defensible
and protective of the designated uses of
the bodies of water. In establishing
criteria, States may base it on (1) EPA’s
recommended criteria, (2) EPA’s
recommended criteria modified to
reflect site-specific conditions, or (3)
other scientifically defensible methods.
The EPA’s water quality criteria
recommendations are not regulations.
Thus, the EPA’s recommended criteria
do not constitute legally binding
requirements.
II. What are the Recreational Water
Quality Criteria recommendations?
The EPA is today publishing the
Recreational Water Quality Criteria
recommendations for protecting human
health. The EPA evaluated the available
data and provided an opportunity for
the public to provide scientific views on
the 2011 Draft RWQC. EPA received
more than 9,000 comments. EPA
reviewed the comments and made some
changes in response to those comments.
The comments can be found in the
docket associated with this action.
Based on the available data and input
from comments, EPA determined that
the designated use of primary contact
recreation would be protected if the
following criteria were adopted into
water quality standards:
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
71192
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 230 / Thursday, November 29, 2012 / Notices
RECOMMENDED 2012 RWQC
Criteria elements
Estimated illness rate: 36 per
1,000 primary contact recreators
Estimated illness rate: 32 per
1,000 primary contact recreators
Magnitude
Magnitude
Indicator
GM
(cfu/100 mL) a
STV
(cfu/100 mL) a
GM
(cfu/100 mL) a
STV
(cfu/100 mL) a
Enterococci—marine and fresh; or ....................................................................
E. coli—fresh ......................................................................................................
35
126
130
410
30
100
110
320
Duration and Frequency: The waterbody GM should not be greater than the selected GM magnitude in any 30-day interval. There should not
be greater than a ten percent excursion frequency of the selected STV magnitude in the same 30-day interval.
a EPA recommends using EPA Method 1600 (U.S. EPA, 2002a) to measure culturable enterococci, or another equivalent method that measures culturable enterococci and using EPA Method 1603 (U.S. EPA, 2002b) to measure culturable E. coli, or any other equivalent method that
measures culturable E. coli.
Dated: November 19, 2012.
Nancy K. Stoner,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Water.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Announcement of Board
Approval Under Delegated Authority
and Submission to OMB
[FR Doc. 2012–28909 Filed 11–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
final approval of a proposed information
collection by the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System (Board)
under OMB delegated authority, as per
5 CFR 1320.16 (OMB Regulations on
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the
Public). Board-approved collections of
information are incorporated into the
official OMB inventory of currently
approved collections of information.
Copies of the Paperwork Reduction Act
Submission, supporting statements and
approved collection of information
instrument(s) are placed into OMB’s
public docket files. The Federal Reserve
may not conduct or sponsor, and the
respondent is not required to respond
to, an information collection that has
been extended, revised, or implemented
on or after October 1, 1995, unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Federal Reserve Board Clearance
Officer: Cynthia Ayouch, Division of
Research and Statistics, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, DC 20551 (202)
452–3829. Telecommunications Device
for the Deaf (TDD) users may contact
(202) 263–4869, Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System,
Washington, DC 20551.
OMB Desk Officer: Shagufta Ahmed,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10235, 725 17th Street
NW.,Washington, DC 20503.
AGENCY:
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Notice of Agreement Filed
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreement
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreement to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within ten days
of the date this notice appears in the
Federal Register. Copies of the
agreement are available through the
Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov)
or by contacting the Office of
Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 012190.
Title: HSDG–GWF Space Charter
Agreement.
Parties: Hamburg Sud and Great
White Fleet Liner Services Ltd.
Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW.,
Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20006–
4007.
Synopsis: The agreement authorizes
Hamburg Sud to charter space to Great
White Fleet in the trade between ports
in California and ports in Guatemala,
Panama, Ecuador, and Peru.
Dated: November 26, 2012.
By Order of the Federal Maritime
Commission.
Rachel Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–28921 Filed 11–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Nov 28, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
On
September 14, 2012, a final notice was
published in the Federal Register (77
FR 56842) finalizing the revisions to the
FR Y–10, Report of Changes in
Organizational Structure, and FR Y–6,
Annual Report of Holding Companies
(OMB No: 7100–0297), which included
requiring nonbank financial companies
supervised by the Federal Reserve and
designated financial market utilities
(DFMUs) to begin submitting these
reports effective December 2012.
Subsequent to the publication of the
final notice, the Federal Reserve
determined that the data collected in the
FR Y–10 and FR Y–6 is not
appropriately tailored for DFMUs, and
structure data with respect to DFMUs
that is necessary to populate certain
databases can be initially generated
internally. In addition, the final notice
required nonbank financial companies
supervised by the Board to submit the
FR Y–10 and the FR Y–6 reports. Given
that the Financial Stability Oversight
Council has not made any final decision
on designating nonbank financial
companies as systemically important,
the Federal Reserve believes it is more
appropriate to determine the reporting
requirements for these entities once they
are identified. Accordingly, the Federal
Reserve is removing the requirement for
these entities to submit these reports
effective December 2012.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, November 23, 2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012–28850 Filed 11–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 230 (Thursday, November 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71191-71192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28909]
[[Page 71191]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-OW-2011-0466; FRL 9756-2]
2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of the 2012 Recreational Water Quality
Criteria.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 304(a) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the availability of
the 2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria (RWQC). The document
contains the EPA's recreational water quality criteria recommendations
for protecting human health in ambient waters that are designated for
primary contact recreation. CWA Section 304(a) water quality criteria
recommendations are intended as guidance to States and authorized
Tribes in developing water quality standards. The 2012 RWQC document
describes the relevant scientific findings, explains how these findings
were used to derive criteria for two indicators of fecal contamination
(enterrococcus and E. coli) as measured by culture based test methods.
On December 21, 2011, EPA made available draft national recommended
recreational water quality criteria (2011 Draft RWQC) and provided the
public an opportunity to provide scientific views.
The 2012 RWQC differs from the current 1986 Ambient Water Quality
Criteria in the following ways: the EPA recommends States use one of
two sets of criteria values, and no longer recommends multiple ``use
intensity'' values; the RWQC consist of both a geometric mean (GM) and
a Statistical Threshold Value (STV); the RWQC are now comprised of a
magnitude, a duration, and frequency of excursion for the GM and STV;
the EPA introduces a rapid analytical technique for beach monitoring,
quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), for the detection of
enterococci in recreational water (EPA Method 1611; the EPA provides
information on tools for evaluating and managing recreational waters,
such as predictive modeling; the EPA is providing a beach action value
for use in beach notification programs; and the EPA is providing tools
for developing site-specific criteria.
The CWA, as amended by the Beaches Environmental Assessment and
Coastal Health (BEACH) Act of 2000, directed the EPA to conduct studies
associated with pathogens and human health under section 104(v), and to
publish new or revised criteria for pathogens and pathogen indicators
based on those studies under section 304(a)(9). The criteria announced
today are the new or revised criteria that EPA is directed to publish
under section 304(a)(9) of the CWA, as amended by the BEACH Act.
ADDRESSES: The draft 2011 and final 2012 RWQC documents, as well as the
scientific views received from the public on the draft 2011 RWQC, are
available from the EPA Docket Center and are identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0466. They may be accessed online at:
www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions.
Email: OW-Docket@epa.gov.
Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) Water Docket, MC 28221T; 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
On Site: EPA Docket Center, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
EPA West, Room 3334, Washington, DC. This Docket Facility is open from
8:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the Office of Water is (202)
566-2426.
For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions concerning the science
supporting these criteria, contact Sharon Nappier, Health and
Ecological Criteria Division (4304T), nappier.sharon@epa.gov, U.S. EPA,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; (202) 566-0740. For
questions concerning the use of EPA's criteria recommendations, contact
Tracy Bone, Standards and Health Protection Division (4305T),
bone.tracy@epa.gov, U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460; (202) 564-5257.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What are section 304(a) water quality criteria?
Section 304(a) water quality criteria are recommendations developed
by EPA under authority of section 304(a) of the Clean Water Act based
on the latest scientific information on the relationship that the
effect of a constituent concentration has on particular aquatic species
and/or human health. Section 304(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act directs
the EPA to develop and publish and, from time to time, revise, criteria
for water quality accurately reflecting the latest scientific
knowledge. Water quality criteria developed under section 304(a) are
based solely on data and scientific judgments on the relationship
between pollutant concentrations and environmental and human health
effects. Section 304(a) criteria do not reflect consideration of
economic impacts or the technological feasibility of meeting pollutant
concentrations in ambient water.
Section 304(a) criteria provide guidance to States and authorized
Tribes in adopting water quality standards that ultimately provide a
basis for controlling discharges or releases of pollutants. The
criteria also provide guidance to the EPA when promulgating Federal
regulations under section 303(c) when such action is necessary. Under
the CWA and its implementing regulations, States and authorized Tribes
are to adopt water quality criteria to protect designated uses (e.g.,
aquatic life, recreational use). States and authorized Tribes may adopt
other scientifically defensible water quality criteria that differ from
these recommendations. When adopting new or revised water quality
standards, the States and authorized Tribes must adopt criteria that
are scientifically defensible and protective of the designated uses of
the bodies of water. In establishing criteria, States may base it on
(1) EPA's recommended criteria, (2) EPA's recommended criteria modified
to reflect site-specific conditions, or (3) other scientifically
defensible methods. The EPA's water quality criteria recommendations
are not regulations. Thus, the EPA's recommended criteria do not
constitute legally binding requirements.
II. What are the Recreational Water Quality Criteria recommendations?
The EPA is today publishing the Recreational Water Quality Criteria
recommendations for protecting human health. The EPA evaluated the
available data and provided an opportunity for the public to provide
scientific views on the 2011 Draft RWQC. EPA received more than 9,000
comments. EPA reviewed the comments and made some changes in response
to those comments. The comments can be found in the docket associated
with this action. Based on the available data and input from comments,
EPA determined that the designated use of primary contact recreation
would be protected if the following criteria were adopted into water
quality standards:
[[Page 71192]]
Recommended 2012 RWQC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Criteria elements Estimated illness rate: 36 per 1,000
primary contact recreators
Estimated illness rate: 32 per 1,000
primary contact recreators
�������������������������������
Magnitude
Magnitude
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicator GM STV GM STV
(cfu/100 mL) \a\ (cfu/100 mL) \a\ (cfu/100 mL) \a\ (cfu/100 mL) \a\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enterococci--marine and fresh; 35 130 30 110
or.
E. coli--fresh................ 126 410 100 320
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration and Frequency: The waterbody GM should not be greater than the selected GM magnitude in any 30-day
interval. There should not be greater than a ten percent excursion frequency of the selected STV magnitude in
the same 30-day interval.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ EPA recommends using EPA Method 1600 (U.S. EPA, 2002a) to measure culturable enterococci, or another
equivalent method that measures culturable enterococci and using EPA Method 1603 (U.S. EPA, 2002b) to measure
culturable E. coli, or any other equivalent method that measures culturable E. coli.
Dated: November 19, 2012.
Nancy K. Stoner,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Water.
[FR Doc. 2012-28909 Filed 11-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P