Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Revision of U.S. Munitions List Category XI and Definition for “Equipment”, 70958-70964 [2012-28477]
Download as PDF
70958
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
4.3. With regard to innovative
products and treatments for ‘‘reduction
in consumption of tobacco,’’
a. How can the reduction best be
measured?
b. If the reduction is associated with
a certain goal or benefit:
i. What evidence is available to
indicate that the reduction in
consumption will bring about that goal
or achieve that benefit?
ii. What degree and duration of
reduction are necessary to achieve that
goal or benefit?
4.4. With regard to innovative
products and treatments for ‘‘reduction
in the harm associated with continued
tobacco use’’:
a. How should the ‘‘harm’’ be
identified and measured?
b. Is there a range of harms that might
be addressed, and if so, which are the
most important to address?
4.5. With regard to innovative
products and treatments making claims
in any of the three categories identified
in section 918(b), what barriers exist to
development and marketing approval?
4.6 In regulating the innovative
products and treatments referenced in
section 918(b), how can FDA and other
HHS Agencies act to ensure that the
three effects mentioned in section
918(b)—total abstinence from tobacco
use, reductions in consumption of
tobacco, and reductions in the harm
associated with continued tobacco use—
are achieved as broader outcomes, in a
manner that best protects and promotes
the public health?
4.7. How can these broader outcomes
be taken into account in FDA’s
premarket evaluation of new product
candidates?
III. Attendance and Registration
The FDA Conference Center at the
White Oak location is a Federal facility
with security procedures and limited
seating. Attendance is free and will be
on a first-come, first-served basis.
Individuals who wish to present at the
public hearing must register by
December 6, 2012, and provide
complete contact information, including
name, title, affiliation, address, email,
and phone number. Those without
email access may register by contacting
Ayanna Augustus (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). FDA has
included questions for comment in
section II of this document. You should
identify the number of each question
you wish to address in your
presentation, so that FDA can consider
that in organizing the presentations.
Individuals and organizations with
common interests should consolidate or
coordinate their presentations and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Nov 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
request time for a joint presentation.
FDA will do its best to accommodate
requests to speak and will determine the
amount of time allotted for each oral
presentation, and the approximate time
that each oral presentation is scheduled
to begin. FDA will notify registered
presenters of their scheduled times, and
make available an agenda at https://
www.fda.gov/Drugs/NewsEvents/
ucm324938.htm approximately 1 week
prior to the public hearing. Once FDA
notifies registered presenters of their
scheduled times, presenters should
submit to FDA an electronic copy of
their presentation to
Section918PublicMeeting@fda.hhs.gov
by December 10, 2012.
If you need special accommodations
because of a disability, please contact
Ayanna Augustus (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 7 days
before the meeting.
A live Web cast of this public hearing
may be seen at https://
collaboration.fda.gov/Section918 on the
day of the public hearing. A video
record of the public hearing will be
available at the same Web address for 1
year.
IV. Notice of Hearing Under 21 CFR
Part 15
The Commissioner of Food and Drugs
is announcing that the public hearing
will be held in accordance with part 15
(21 CFR part 15). The hearing will be
conducted by a presiding officer, who
will be accompanied by senior
management and technical experts from
various offices within FDA.
Under § 15.30(f), the hearing is
informal and the rules of evidence do
not apply. No participant may interrupt
the presentation of another participant.
Only the presiding officer and panel
members may question any person
during or at the conclusion of each
presentation. Public hearings under part
15 are subject to FDA’s policy and
procedures for electronic media
coverage of FDA’s public administrative
proceedings (part 10 (21 CFR part 10,
subpart C)). Under § 10.205,
representatives of the electronic media
may be permitted, subject to certain
limitations, to videotape, film, or
otherwise record FDA’s public
administrative proceedings, including
presentations by participants. The
hearing will be transcribed as stipulated
in § 15.30(b) (see section VI of this
document). To the extent that the
conditions for the hearing, as described
in this document, conflict with any
provisions set out in part 15, this
document acts as a waiver of those
provisions as specified in § 15.30(h).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
V. Request for Comments
Regardless of attendance at the public
hearing, interested persons may submit
either electronic or written comments to
the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES). It is no longer
necessary to send two copies of mailed
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
VI. Transcripts
Transcripts of the public hearing will
be available for review at the Division
of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
and on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov approximately 30
days after the public hearing. A
transcript will also be made available in
either hard copy or on CD–ROM, upon
submission of a Freedom of Information
request. Written requests should be sent
to the Division of Freedom of
Information (ELEM–1029), Food and
Drug Administration, 12420 Parklawn
Dr., Element Bldg., Rockville, MD
20857.
Dated: November 21, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–28835 Filed 11–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
RIN 1400–AD25
[Public Notice: 8091]
Amendment to the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations: Revision of U.S.
Munitions List Category XI and
Definition for ‘‘Equipment’’
Department of State.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
As part of the President’s
Export Control Reform effort, the
Department of State proposes to amend
the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) to revise Category XI
(military electronics) of the U.S.
Munitions List (USML) to describe more
precisely the articles warranting control
on the USML and to provide a
definition for ‘‘equipment.’’ The
revisions contained in this rule are part
of the Department of State’s
retrospective plan under E.O. 13563
completed on August 17, 2011. The
Department of State’s full plan can be
accessed at https://www.state.gov/
documents/organization/181028.pdf.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
The Department of State will
accept comments on this proposed rule
until January 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments within 60 days of the
date of publication by one of the
following methods:
• Email:
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov with the
subject line, ‘‘ITAR Amendment—
Category XI and ‘Equipment.’ ’’
• Internet: At www.regulations.gov,
search for this notice by using this rule’s
RIN (1400–AD25).
Comments received after that date will
be considered if feasible, but
consideration cannot be assured. Those
submitting comments should not
include any personally identifying
information they do not desire to be
made public or information for which a
claim of confidentiality is asserted
because those comments and/or
transmittal emails will be made
available for public inspection and
copying after the close of the comment
period via the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls Web site at
www.pmddtc.state.gov. Parties who
wish to comment anonymously may do
so by submitting their comments via
www.regulations.gov, leaving the fields
that would identify the commenter
blank and including no identifying
information in the comment itself.
Comments submitted via
www.regulations.gov are immediately
available for public inspection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Candace M. J. Goforth, Director, Office
of Defense Trade Controls Policy,
Department of State, telephone (202)
663–2792; email
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Regulatory Change, USML Category XI
and ‘‘Equipment.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
(DDTC), U.S. Department of State,
administers the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts
120–130). The items subject to the
jurisdiction of the ITAR, i.e., ‘‘defense
articles,’’ are identified on the ITAR’s
U.S. Munitions List (USML) (22 CFR
121.1). With few exceptions, items not
subject to the export control jurisdiction
of the ITAR are subject to the
jurisdiction of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR,’’ 15
CFR parts 730–774, which includes the
Commerce Control List (CCL) in
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774),
administered by the Bureau of Industry
and Security (BIS), U.S. Department of
Commerce. Both the ITAR and the EAR
impose license requirements on exports
and reexports. Items not subject to the
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:16 Nov 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
ITAR or to the exclusive licensing
jurisdiction of any other set of
regulations are subject to the EAR.
Export Control Reform Update
The Departments of State and
Commerce described in their respective
Advanced Notices of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM) in December
2010 the Administration’s plan to make
the USML and the CCL positive, tiered,
and aligned so that eventually they can
be combined into a single control list
(see ‘‘Commerce Control List: Revising
Descriptions of Items and Foreign
Availability,’’ 75 FR 76664 (December 9,
2010) and ‘‘Revisions to the United
States Munitions List,’’ 75 FR 76935
(December 10, 2010)). The notices also
called for the establishment of a ‘‘bright
line’’ between the USML and the CCL to
reduce government and industry
uncertainty regarding export
jurisdiction by clarifying whether
particular items are subject to the
jurisdiction of the ITAR or the EAR.
While these remain the
Administration’s ultimate Export
Control Reform objectives, their
concurrent implementation would be
problematic in the near term. In order to
more quickly reach the national security
objectives of greater interoperability
with U.S. allies, enhancing the defense
industrial base, and permitting the U.S.
Government to focus its resources on
controlling and monitoring the export
and reexport of more significant items to
destinations, end-uses, and end-users of
greater concern than NATO allies and
other multi-regime partners, the
Administration has decided, as an
interim step, to propose and implement
revisions to both the USML and the CCL
that are more positive, but not yet
tiered.
Specifically, based in part on a review
of the comments received in response to
the December 2010 notices, the
Administration has determined that
fundamentally altering the structure of
the USML by tiering and aligning it on
a category-by-category basis would
significantly disrupt the export control
compliance systems and procedures of
exporters and reexporters. For example,
until the entire USML was revised and
became final, some USML categories
would follow the legacy numbering and
control structures while the newly
revised categories would follow a
completely different numbering
structure. In order to allow for the
national security benefits to flow from
re-aligning the jurisdictional status of
defense articles that no longer warrant
control on the USML on a category-bycategory basis while minimizing the
impact on exporters’ internal control
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70959
and jurisdictional and classification
marking systems, the Administration
plans to proceed with building positive
lists now and afterward return to
structural changes.
Revision of Category XI
This proposed rule revises USML
Category XI, covering military
electronics, to advance the national
security objectives set forth above and to
more accurately describe the articles
within the category, in order to establish
a ‘‘bright line’’ between the USML and
the CCL for the control of these articles.
Paragraphs (a)(1) (covering
underwater hardware, equipment, and
systems), (a)(3) (covering radar systems
and equipment), (a)(4) (covering
electronic combat equipment), and (a)(5)
(covering C3, C4, C4ISR, and
identification systems and equipment),
are amended to more specifically
enumerate the articles controlled
therein.
Paragraph (a)(6), which currently
controls military computers, is removed,
and the articles controlled therein are
transferred to the jurisdiction of the
Department of Commerce under new
ECCN 3A611.
Paragraph (a)(8) is added to cover
unattended ground sensors.
Paragraph (a)(9) is added to cover
electronic sensor systems for antisubmarine warfare or mine warfare.
Paragraph (a)(10) is added to cover
electronic sensor systems for concealed
weapons.
Paragraph (a)(11) is added to cover
test sets ‘‘specially designed’’ and
programmed for testing counter radio
controlled improvised explosive device
electronic warfare systems.
Paragraph (a)(12) is added to cover
equipment to process or analyze
Category XI defense articles.
Paragraph (b) (covering electronic
systems or equipment for search,
reconnaissance, collection, monitoring,
direction finding, display, analysis, or
production of information from the
electromagnetic spectrum and electronic
systems or equipment that counteracts
electronic surveillance) is amended to
provide consistency with Wassenaar
Munitions List controls while retaining
the same catch-all coverage of the
current paragraph (b).
A significant aspect of this more
positive, but not yet tiered, proposed
USML category is that it does not
contain controls on all generic parts,
components, accessories, and
attachments that are specifically
designed or modified for a defense
article, regardless of their significance to
maintaining a military advantage for the
United States. Rather, it contains, with
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
70960
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
a few exceptions, a positive list of
specific types of parts, components,
accessories, and attachments that
continue to warrant control on the
USML. The exceptions pertain to those
parts, components, accessories, and
attachments identified as ‘‘specially
designed.’’
Paragraph (d) is amended to remove
reference to Significant Military
Equipment.
Section 121.8 is amended by
including a definition for ‘‘equipment’’
in new paragraph (h).
Finally, articles common to the
Missile Technology Control Regime
(MTCR) Annex and the USML are to be
identified on the USML with the
parenthetical ‘‘(MT)’’ at the end of each
section containing such articles. A
separate proposed rule will address the
sections in the ITAR that include MTCR
definitions.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Definition for Specially Designed
Although one of the goals of the
export control reform initiative is to
describe USML controls without using
design intent criteria, a few of the
controls in the proposed revision
nonetheless use the term ‘‘specially
designed.’’ It is, therefore, necessary for
the Department to define the term.
Three proposed definitions have been
published to date. For the purpose of
evaluation of this proposed rule,
reviewers should use the definition
provided by the Department of State in
the June 19, 2012, proposed rule (77 FR
36428).
Request for Comments
As the U.S. Government works
through the proposed revisions to the
USML, some solutions have been
adopted that were determined to be the
best of available options. With the
thought that multiple perspectives
would be beneficial to the USML
revision process, the Department
welcomes the assistance of users of the
lists and requests input on the
following:
(1) A key goal of this rulemaking is to
ensure the USML and the CCL together
control all the items that meet
Wassenaar Arrangement commitments
embodied in Munitions List Category 11
(WA–ML11). To that end, the public is
asked to identify any potential lack of
coverage brought about by the proposed
rules for Category XI contained in this
notice and the new Category 3 ECCNs
published separately by the Department
of Commerce when reviewed together.
(2) The key goal of this rulemaking is
to establish a ‘‘bright line’’ between the
USML and the CCL for the control of
these materials. The public is asked to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:16 Nov 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
provide specific examples of military
electronics whose jurisdiction would be
in doubt based on this revision.
(3) The current USML Category XI(c)
does not control electronic parts,
components, accessories, and
attachments ‘‘in normal commercial
use.’’ Although the proposed revisions
to the USML do not preclude the
possibility that electronic and other
items in normal commercial use would
or should be ITAR-controlled because,
e.g., they provide the United States with
a critical military or intelligence
advantage, the U.S. Government does
not want to inadvertently control items
on the ITAR that are in normal
commercial use. The public is thus
asked to provide specific examples of
electronics, if any, that would be
controlled by the revised Category XI
that are now in normal commercial use.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the
opinion that controlling the import and
export of defense articles and services is
a foreign affairs function of the United
States Government and that rules
implementing this function are exempt
from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA). Although the
Department is of the opinion that this
rule is exempt from the rulemaking
provisions of the APA, the Department
is publishing this rule with a 60-day
provision for public comment and
without prejudice to its determination
that controlling the import and export of
defense services is a foreign affairs
function. As noted above, and also
without prejudice to the Department
position that this rulemaking is not
subject to the APA, the Department
previously published a related Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (RIN
1400–AC78) on December 10, 2010 (75
FR 76935), and accepted comments for
60 days.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since the Department is of the
opinion that this rule is exempt from the
rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553,
it does not require analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed amendment does not
involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed amendment has been
found not to be a major rule within the
meaning of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This proposed amendment will not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this proposed
amendment does not have sufficient
federalism implications to require
consultations or warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this proposed
amendment.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ although not economically
significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the rule has been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
the proposed amendment in light of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection of
information, subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA), unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
This proposed rule would affect the
following approved collections: (1)
Statement of Registration, DS–2032,
OMB No. 1405–0002; (2) Application/
License for Permanent Export of
Unclassified Defense Articles and
Related Unclassified Technical Data,
DSP–5, OMB No. 1405–0003; (3)
Application/License for Temporary
Import of Unclassified Defense Articles,
DSP–61, OMB No. 1405–0013; (4)
Nontransfer and Use Certificate, DSP–
83, OMB No. 1405–0021; (5)
Application/License for Permanent/
Temporary Export or Temporary Import
of Classified Defense Articles and
Classified Technical Data, DSP–85,
OMB No. 1405–0022; (6) Application/
License for Temporary Export of
Unclassified Defense Articles, DSP–73,
OMB No. 1405–0023; (7) Statement of
Political Contributions, Fees, or
Commissions in Connection with the
Sale of Defense Articles or Services,
OMB No. 1405–0025; (8) Authority to
Export Defense Articles and Services
Sold Under the Foreign Military Sales
(FMS) Program, DSP–94, OMB No.
1405–0051; (9) Application for
Amendment to License for Export or
Import of Classified or Unclassified
Defense Articles and Related Technical
Data, DSP–6, –62, –74, –119, OMB No.
1405–0092; (10) Request for Approval of
Manufacturing License Agreements,
Technical Assistance Agreements, and
Other Agreements, DSP–5, OMB No.
1405–0093; (11) Maintenance of Records
by Registrants, OMB No. 1405–0111;
(12) Annual Brokering Report, DS–4142,
OMB No. 1405–0141; (13) Brokering
Prior Approval (License), DS–4143,
OMB No. 1405–0142; (14) Projected Sale
of Major Weapons in Support of Section
25(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act,
DS–4048, OMB No. 1405–0156; (15)
Export Declaration of Defense Technical
Data or Services, DS–4071, OMB No.
1405–0157; (16) Request for Commodity
Jurisdiction Determination, DS–4076,
OMB No. 1405–0163; (17) Request to
Change End-User, End-Use, and/or
Destination of Hardware, DS–6004,
OMB No. 1405–0173; (18) Request for
Advisory Opinion, DS–6001, OMB No.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:16 Nov 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
1405–0174; (19) Voluntary Disclosure,
OMB No. 1405–0179; and (20)
Technology Security/Clearance Plans,
Screening Records, and Non-Disclosure
Agreements Pursuant to 22 CFR 126.18,
OMB No. 1405–0195. The Department
of State believes there will be minimal
changes to these collections. The
Department of State believes the
combined effect of all rules to be
published moving commodities from
the USML to the EAR as part of the
Administration’s Export Control Reform
would decrease the number of license
applications by approximately 30,000
annually. The Department of State is
looking for comments on the potential
reduction in burden.
List of Subjects in Part 121
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter
M, part 121 is proposed to be amended
as follows:
PART 121—THE UNITED STATES
MUNITIONS LIST
1. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311; 3 CFR, 1977
Comp. p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub. L. 105–
261, 112 Stat. 1920.
2. Section 121.1 is amended by
revising U.S. Munitions List Category XI
to read as follows:
§ 121.1 General. The United States
Munitions List.
*
*
*
*
*
Category XI—Military Electronics
(a) Electronic equipment not included
in Category XII of the U.S. Munitions
list, as follows:
(1) Underwater hardware, equipment,
or systems, as follows:
(i) Active or passive acoustic array
sensing systems or equipment that
survey or detect, and track, localize (i.e.,
determine range and bearing), classify,
or identify surface vessels, submarines,
other undersea vehicles, torpedoes, or
mines having any of the following:
(A) Multi-aspect capability;
(B) Operating frequency less than 20
kHz;
(C) Bandwidth greater than 10 kHz; or
(D) Capable of real-time processing;
(ii) Underwater single acoustic sensor
system that distinguishes tonals and
locates the origin of the sound;
(iii) Non-acoustic systems that survey
or detect, and track, localize, classify, or
identify surface vessels, submarines,
other undersea vehicles, torpedoes, or
mines;
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70961
Note to paragraph (a)(1)(iii): Equipment
controlled in CCL ECCN 5A001.b.1 is not
included.
(iv) Acoustic modems, networks, and
communications equipment with
adaptive compensation or employing
Low Probability of Intercept (LPI);
Note 1 to paragraph (a)(1)(iv): Adaptive
compensation is the capability of an
underwater modem to assess the water
conditions to select the best algorithm to
receive and transmit data.
Note 2 to paragraph (a)(1)(iv): The term
‘‘Low Probability of Intercept’’ used in this
paragraph and elsewhere in this category is
defined as a class of measures that disguise,
delay, or prevent the interception of acoustic
or electromagnetic signals. LPI techniques
can involve permutations of power
management, energy management, frequency
variability, out-of-receiver-frequency band,
low-side lobe antenna, complex waveforms,
and complex scanning. LPI is also referred to
as Low Probability of Intercept, Low
Probability of Detection, and Low Probability
of Identification.
(v) LF/VLF electronic modems,
routers, interfaces and communications
equipment ‘‘specially designed’’ for
submarine communications; or
(vi) Autonomous processing/control
systems and equipment that enable
cooperative sensing and engagement by
fixed (bottom mounted/seabed) or
mobile Autonomous Underwater
Vehicles (AUVs);
(2) Underwater acoustic
countermeasures or countercountermeasures systems or equipment;
(3) Radar systems and equipment, as
follows:
(i) Airborne radar that track targets;
(ii) Synthetic aperture radar (SAR)
incorporating image resolution less than
(better than) 0.3 meter, or incorporating
Coherent Change Detection (CCD) with
geo-registration accuracy less than
(better than) 0.3 meter;
(iii) Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar
(ISAR);
(iv) Radar that geo-locates with a
target location error 50 (TLE50) less
than or equal to 10 meters;
(v) Any ocean surface surveillance
radar with either a product of transmit
peak power times antenna gain divided
by minimum detectable signal of >165
dB, or a capability to distinguish a target
of <10 dBsm from sea clutter with a
false alarm rate of 10¥6 or better in sea
state 3 or higher, or both;
(vi) Sea surveillance/navigation radar
with free space detection of 1 square
meter radar cross section (RCS) target at
20 nautical miles (nmi) or greater range;
(vii) Land or perimeter surveillance
radar with free space detection of 1
square meter RCS target at 5.4 nmi or
greater range and has a revisit rate of
faster than once every sixty seconds;
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
70962
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(viii) Air surveillance radar with free
space detection of 1 sq m RCS target at
85 nmi or greater range or free space
detection of 1 sq m RCS target at an
altitude of 65,000 feet and an elevation
angle greater than 20 degrees;
(ix) Air surveillance radar with
multiple elevation beams, phase or
amplitude monopulse estimation, or 3D
height-finding;
(x) Air surveillance radar with a beam
solid angle less than or equal to 16
degrees2 that performs free space
tracking of 1 sq m RCS target at a range
greater or equal to 25 nmi with revisit
rate greater or equal to 1⁄3 hertz;
(xi) Instrumentation radar for
anechoic test facility or outdoor range to
track targets, or provide measure of RCS
of static target less than or equal to
¥10dBsm, or RCS of dynamic target;
(xii) Radar incorporating pulsed
operation with electronics steering of
transmit beam in elevation and azimuth;
(xiii) Radar with mode(s) for ballistic
tracking or ballistic extrapolation to
source of launch or impact point of
articles controlled in USML Categories
III or IV;
(xiv) Active protection radar and
missile warning radar with mode(s)
implemented for detection of incoming
munitions;
(xv) Over the horizon high frequency
sky-wave (ionosphere) radar;
(xvi) Radar that detects a moving
object through a physical obstruction at
distance greater than 0.2 meters from
the obstruction;
(xvii) Radar having moving target
indicator (MTI) or pulse-Doppler
processing where any single Doppler
filter provides a normalized clutter
attenuation of greater than 50dB;
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
Note to paragraph (a)(3)(xvii):
‘‘Normalized clutter attenuation’’ is defined
as the reduction in the power level of
received distributed clutter when normalized
to the thermal noise level.
(xviii) Radar having electronic
protection (EP) or electronic countercountermeasures (ECCM) other than
manual gain control, automatic gain
control, radio frequency selection,
constant false alarm rate, and pulse
repetition interval jitter;
(xix) Radar employing electronic
attack (EA) mode(s) using the radar
transmitter and antenna;
(xx) Radar employing electronic
support (ES) mode(s) (i.e., the ability to
use a radar system for ES purposes in
one or more of the following: As a highgain receiver, as a wide-bandwidth
receiver, as a multi-beam receiver, or as
part of a multi-point system);
(xxi) Radar employing noncooperative target recognition (NCTR)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:16 Nov 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
(i.e., the ability to recognize a specific
platform type without cooperative
action of the target platform);
(xxii) Radar employing automatic
target recognition (ATR) (i.e.,
recognition of generic target type using
structural features of the target) with
system resolution better than (less than)
0.3 meters;
(xxiii) Radar that sends interceptor
guidance commands or provides
illumination keyed to an interceptor
seeker;
(xxiv) Radar employing waveform
generation for low probability of
intercept (LPI) other than frequency
modulated continuous wave (FMCW)
with linear ramp modulation;
(xxv) Radar that sends and receives
communications;
(xxvi) Radar that tracks or
discriminates ballistic missile warhead
from debris or countermeasures;
(xxvii) Bi-static/multi-static radar that
exploits greater than 125 kHz
bandwidth and is lower than 2 GHz
center frequency to passively detect or
track using RF transmissions (e.g.,
commercial radio or television stations);
(xxviii) Radar target generators,
projectors, or simulators ‘‘specially
designed’’ for radars controlled by this
category; or
(xxix) Radar and laser radar systems
‘‘specially designed’’ for defense articles
in (a)(1) of Category IV and (a)(5) and
(a)(6) of Category VIII (MT);
Note to paragraph (a)(3): This category
does not control secondary surveillance radar
(SSR) or precision approach radar (PAR)
equipment conforming to ICAO standards
and employing electronically steerable linear
(1-dimensional) arrays or mechanically
positioned passive antennae.
(4) Electronic combat equipment, as
follows:
(i) Electronic support (ES) systems
and equipment that search for,
intercept, and identify, or locate sources
of intentional or unintentional
electromagnetic energy for the purpose
of immediate threat detection,
recognition, targeting, planning, or
conduct of future operations;
Note to paragraph (a)(4)(i): Electronic
Support functions consist of tactical
situational awareness, automatic cueing,
targeting, electronic order of battle planning,
electronic intelligence (ELINT),
communication intelligence (COMINT),
signals intelligence (SIGINT).
(ii) Systems and equipment that
detect and automatically discriminate
acoustic energy emanating from
weapons fire (e.g., gunfire, artillery,
rocket propelled grenades, or other
projectiles), determining location or
direction of weapons fire in less than
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
two seconds from receipt of event
signal, and able to operate on-the-move
(e.g., operating on personnel, land
vehicles, sea vessels, or aircraft while in
motion); or
(iii) Systems and equipment
‘‘specially designed’’ to introduce
extraneous or erroneous signals into
radar, infrared based seekers, electrooptic based seekers, radio
communication receivers, navigation
receivers, or that otherwise hinder the
reception, operation, or effectiveness of
adversary electronics (e.g., active or
passive electronic attack, electronic
countermeasure, electronic countercountermeasure equipment, jamming,
and counter jamming equipment);
(5) Command, control, and
communications (C3), command,
control, communications, and
computers (C4), command, control,
communications, computers,
intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance (C4ISR), and
identification systems or equipment, as
follows:
(i) C3, C4, and C4ISR systems
‘‘specially designed’’ to integrate,
incorporate, network, or employ defense
articles controlled in this subchapter;
(ii) Identification friend or foe (IFF)
systems or equipment incorporating
U.S. government Modes 4 or 5;
(iii) Systems or equipment that
implement active or passive electronic
counter-countermeasures (ECCM) used
to counter acts of communication
disruption (e.g., radios that incorporate
HAVE QUICK I/II, SINCGARS,
SATURN);
(iv) Systems or equipment
implementing techniques to suppress
compromising emanations of
information bearing signals ‘‘specially
designed’’ or certified to meet U.S.
Government NSTISSAM TEMPEST 1–
92 standards or CNSSAM TEMPEST 01–
02; or
(v) Systems or equipment that
transmit voice or data signals ‘‘specially
designed’’ to elude electromagnetic
detection;
(6) [Reserved]
(7) Developmental electronic devices,
systems, or equipment funded by the
Department of Defense;
Note 1 to paragraph (a)(7): Paragraph
XI(a)(7) does not control developmental
electronic devices, systems, or equipment (a)
determined to be subject to the EAR via a
commodity jurisdiction determination (see
§ 120.4 of this subchapter) or (b) identified in
the relevant Department of Defense contract
as being developed for both civil and military
applications.
Note 2 to paragraph (a)(7): Note 1 does not
apply to defense articles enumerated on the
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
USML, whether in production or
development.
(8) Unattended ground sensor (UGS)
systems or equipment having all of the
following:
(i) Automatic target detection;
(ii) Automatic target tracking,
classification, recognition, or
identification;
(iii) Self-forming or self-healing
networks; and
(iv) Self-localization for geo-locating
targets;
(9) Electronic sensor systems or
equipment for non-acoustic antisubmarine warfare (ASW) or mine
warfare (e.g., magnetic anomaly
detectors (MAD), electric-field, and
electromagnetic induction);
(10) Electronic sensor systems or
equipment for detection of concealed
weapons, having a standoff detection
range of greater than 45 meters for
personnel or detection of vehicle-carried
weapons;
(11) Test sets ‘‘specially designed’’
and programmed for testing counter
radio controlled improvised explosive
device (C–RCIED) electronic warfare
(CREW) systems;
(12) Equipment ‘‘specially designed’’
to process or analyze signals from
defense articles controlled by this
category; or
(13) Direction finding equipment for
determining bearings to specific
electromagnetic sources or terrain
characteristics ‘‘specially designed’’ for
defense articles in paragraph (a)(1) of
Category IV and paragraphs (a)(5) and
(a)(6) of Category VIII (MT).
(b) Electronic systems or equipment
‘‘specially designed’’ for the collection,
surveillance, monitoring, or exploitation
of the electromagnetic spectrum
(regardless of transmission medium), for
intelligence or security purposes or for
counteracting such activities. This
includes:
(1) Non-cooperative direction finding
systems that have an angle of arrival
(AOA) accuracy better than (less than)
two degrees RMS and are not ‘‘specially
designed’’ for navigation;
(2) Such systems or equipment that
use burst techniques (e.g., time
compression techniques);
(3) Systems and equipment ‘‘specially
designed’’ for measurement and
signature intelligence (MASINT);
(4) Technical surveillance countermeasure (TSCM) or electronic
surveillance equipment and counter
electronic surveillance equipment
(including spectrum analyzers) for the
RF/microwave spectrum that:
(i) Sweep or scan speed exceeding 250
MHz per second;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:16 Nov 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
(ii) Have instantaneous bandwidth
exceeding 110 MHz;
(iii) Have built-in signal analysis
capability;
(iv) Have a volume of less than 1
cubic foot;
(v) Record time-domain or frequencydomain digital signals other than single
trace spectral snapshots; and
(vi) Display time-vs-frequency domain
(e.g., waterfall or rising raster).
(c) Parts, components, accessories,
attachments, and associated equipment,
as follows:
(1) Application specific integrated
circuits (ASIC) for which the
functionality is ‘‘specially designed’’ for
defense articles in this subchapter;
(2) Printed circuit boards or patterned
multichip modules for which the layout
is ‘‘specially designed’’ for defense
articles in this subchapter;
(3) Transmit/receive modules or
transmit modules that have any two
perpendicular sides, with either length
d (in cm) equal to or less than 15
divided by the lowest operating
frequency in GHz [d≤15cm*GHz/fGHz],
that incorporate a MMIC or discrete RF
power transistor and a phase shifter or
phasers;
(4) High-energy storage capacitors
with a repetition rate of 6 discharges or
more per minute that have any of the
following:
(i) Volumetric energy density greater
than or equal to 1.3 J/cc;
(ii) Mass energy density greater than
or equal to 1.1 kJ/kg; or
(iii) Full energy life greater than or
equal to 10,000 discharges;
(5) Radio frequency circulators of any
dimension equal to or less than one
quarter (1⁄4) wavelength of the highest
operating frequency and isolation
greater than 30dB;
(6) Polarimeter that detects and
measures polarization of radio
frequency signals within a single pulse;
(7) Digital radio frequency memory
(DRFM) with RF instantaneous input
bandwidth greater than 400 MHz, and 4
bit or higher resolution and ‘‘specially
designed’’ parts and components
therefor;
(8) Vacuum electronic devices, as
follows:
(i) Multiple electron beam or sheet
electron beam devices rated for
operation at frequencies of 16 GHz or
above, and with a saturated power
output greater than 10,000 W (70 dBm)
or a maximum average power output
greater than 3,000 W (65 dBm); or
(ii) Cross-field amplifiers with a gain
of 15 dB to 17 dB or a duty factor greater
than 5%;
(9) Antenna, and ‘‘specially designed’’
parts and components therefor, that:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70963
(i) Electronically steer angular beams
and nulls with four or more elements;
(ii) Form adaptive null attenuation
greater than 35 dB with convergence
time less than 1 second;
(iii) Detect signals across multiple RF
bands with matched left hand and right
hand spiral antenna elements for
determination of signal polarization; or
(iv) Determine signal angle of arrival
less than two degrees (e.g.,
interferometer antenna);
(10) Radomes or electromagnetic
antenna windows that:
(i) Incorporate radio frequency
selective surfaces (MT);
(ii) Operate in multiple or more nonadjacent radar bands (MT);
(iii) Incorporate a structure that is
‘‘specially designed’’ to provide ballistic
protection from bullets, shrapnel, or
blast (MT);
(iv) Have a melting point greater than
1,300 °C and maintain a dielectric
constant less than 6 at temperatures
greater than 500 °C (MT);
(v) Are manufactured from ceramic
materials with a dielectric constant less
than 6 at any frequency from 100 MHz
to 100 GHz (MT);
(vi) Maintain structural integrity at
stagnation pressures greater than 6,000
pounds per square foot (MT);
(vii) Withstand combined thermal
shock greater than 4.184 × 106 J/m2
accompanied by a peak overpressure of
greater than 50 kPa (MT); or
(viii) Are configured to blend with the
external geometry of end-items
controlled in Category IV (MT);
(11) Underwater sensors (acoustic
vector sensors, hydrophones, or
transducers) or projectors ‘‘specially
designed’’ for systems controlled by
paragraphs (a)(1) and XI(a)(2) of this
category, having any of the following:
(i) A transmitting frequency below 10
kHz;
(ii) Sound pressure level exceeding
224 dB (reference 1 mPa at 1 m) for
equipment with an operating frequency
in the band from 10 kHz to 24 kHz
inclusive;
(iii) Sound pressure level exceeding
235 dB (reference 1 mPa at 1 m) for
equipment with an operating frequency
in the band between 24 kHz and 30 kHz;
(iv) Forming beams of less than 1° on
any axis and having an operating
frequency of less than 100 kHz;
(v) Designed to operate with an
unambiguous display range exceeding
5,120 m; or
(vi) Designed to withstand pressure
during normal operation at depths
exceeding 1,000 m and having
transducers with any of the following:
(A) Dynamic compensation for
pressure; or
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
70964
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(B) Incorporating other than lead
zirconate titanate as the transduction
element;
(12) Parts or components containing
piezoelectric materials which are
‘‘specially designed’’ for underwater
hardware, equipment, or systems
controlled by paragraph (c)(11) of this
category;
(13) Tuners having an instantaneous
bandwidth of 30 MHz or greater and a
tuning speed of 300 microseconds or
less to within 10 KHz of desired
frequency;
(14) Electronic assemblies and
components ‘‘specially designed’’ for
missiles, rockets, or UAVs capable of
achieving a range of at least 300 km and
capable of operation at temperatures in
excess of 125 °C (MT);
(15) ‘‘Specially designed’’ hybrid
(combined analogue/digital) computers
for modeling, simulation, or design
integration of systems enumerated in
paragraphs (a)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2), (h)(1),
(h)(2), (h)(4), (h)(8), and (h)(9) of
Category IV or paragraphs (a)(5) and
(a)(6) of Category VIII (MT);
(16) Parts, components, or accessories
‘‘specially designed’’ to modify or
customize the properties (e.g., operating
frequencies, algorithms, waveforms,
CODECs, or modulation/demodulation
schemes) of a radio or information
assurance/information security article
controlled in this subchapter beyond
what is specified in the public domain
or the published product specifications;
or
(17) Any part, component, accessory,
attachment, equipment, or system that
(MT for those articles designated as
such):
(i) Is classified;
(ii) Contains classified software; or
(iii) Is being developed using
classified information.
(iv) Classified means classified
pursuant to Executive Order 13526, or
predecessor order, and a security
classification guide developed pursuant
thereto or equivalent, or to the
corresponding classification rules of
another government or
intergovernmental organization.
(d) Technical data (see § 120.10 of this
subchapter) and defense services (see
§ 120.9 of this subchapter) directly
related to the defense articles
enumerated in paragraphs (a) through
(c) of this category and classified
technical data directly related to items
controlled in CCL ECCN 9E620 and
defense services using the classified
technical data. (See § 125.4 of this
subchapter for exemptions.) (MT for
technical data and defense services
related to articles designated as such.)
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Nov 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
3. Section 121.8 is amended by
revising the section heading and adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
§ 121.8 End-items, components,
accessories, attachments, parts, firmware,
software, systems, and equipment.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Equipment is a combination of
parts, components, accessories,
attachments, firmware, or software that
operate together to perform a
specialized function of an end-item or a
system.
Dated: November 19, 2012.
Andrew J. Shapiro,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012–28477 Filed 11–23–12; 11:15 am]
estate, among other claims. As part of
the Settlement Agreement, the parties
agreed that it would be mutually
beneficial ‘‘to address means of
improving the trust management of the
Osage Mineral Estate, the Osage Tribal
Trust Account, and Other Osage
Accounts.’’ Settlement Agreement,
Paragraph 1.i. The parties agreed that a
review and revision of the existing
regulations is warranted to better assist
the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in
managing the Osage Mineral Estate. The
parties agreed to engage in a negotiated
rulemaking for this purpose. Settlement
Agreement, Paragraph 9.b. After the
Committee submits its report, BIA will
develop a proposed rule to be published
in the Federal Register.
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
Dated: November 21, 2012.
Michael S. Black,
Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[FR Doc. 2012–28806 Filed 11–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–02–P
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 226
Osage Negotiated Rulemaking
Committee
AGENCY:
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior
ACTION: Notice of public meeting
cancellation
In accordance with the
requirements of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2,
the U.S. Department of the Interior,
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Osage
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee has
cancelled the December 13–14, 2012
meeting.
SUMMARY:
The meetings were originally
scheduled for Thursday, December 13,
2012, and Friday, December 14, 2012,
from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. at the Wah Zha
Zhi Cultural Center, 1449 W. Main,
Pawhuska, Oklahoma 74056. A new
meeting date and location will be
announced later.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Eddie Streater, Designated Federal
Officer, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Wewoka Agency, P.O. Box 1540,
Seminole, OK 74818; telephone (405)
257–6250; fax (405) 257–3875; or email
osageregneg@bia.gov. Additional
Committee information can be found at:
https://www.bia.gov/osageregneg.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 14, 2011, the United States and
the Osage Nation (formerly known as
the Osage Tribe) signed a Settlement
Agreement to resolve litigation
regarding alleged mismanagement of the
Osage Nation’s oil and gas mineral
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0938]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone, Potomac and Anacostia
Rivers; Washington, DC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This action is a supplemental
notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM)
to the Coast Guard’s October 24, 2012,
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that proposed to establish a security
zone during activities associated with
the Presidential Inauguration in
Washington, DC from January 15, 2013
through January 24, 2013 (77 FR 64943).
This supplemental proposal extends the
southern boundary of the proposed
security zone. This rule prohibits
vessels and people from entering the
security zone and requires vessels and
persons in the security zone to depart
the security zone, unless specifically
exempt under the provisions in this rule
or granted specific permission from the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore. This action is intended to
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in
portions of the Potomac and Anacostia
Rivers during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before December 28, 2012.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28NOP1.SGM
28NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 28, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70958-70964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28477]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
RIN 1400-AD25
[Public Notice: 8091]
Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations:
Revision of U.S. Munitions List Category XI and Definition for
``Equipment''
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of the President's Export Control Reform effort, the
Department of State proposes to amend the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) to revise Category XI (military electronics) of the
U.S. Munitions List (USML) to describe more precisely the articles
warranting control on the USML and to provide a definition for
``equipment.'' The revisions contained in this rule are part of the
Department of State's retrospective plan under E.O. 13563 completed on
August 17, 2011. The Department of State's full plan can be accessed at
https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/181028.pdf.
[[Page 70959]]
DATES: The Department of State will accept comments on this proposed
rule until January 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments within 60 days of the
date of publication by one of the following methods:
Email: DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov with the subject line,
``ITAR Amendment--Category XI and `Equipment.' ''
Internet: At www.regulations.gov, search for this notice
by using this rule's RIN (1400-AD25).
Comments received after that date will be considered if feasible, but
consideration cannot be assured. Those submitting comments should not
include any personally identifying information they do not desire to be
made public or information for which a claim of confidentiality is
asserted because those comments and/or transmittal emails will be made
available for public inspection and copying after the close of the
comment period via the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Web site
at www.pmddtc.state.gov. Parties who wish to comment anonymously may do
so by submitting their comments via www.regulations.gov, leaving the
fields that would identify the commenter blank and including no
identifying information in the comment itself. Comments submitted via
www.regulations.gov are immediately available for public inspection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Candace M. J. Goforth, Director,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, telephone
(202) 663-2792; email DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN: Regulatory
Change, USML Category XI and ``Equipment.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
(DDTC), U.S. Department of State, administers the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120-130). The items subject to
the jurisdiction of the ITAR, i.e., ``defense articles,'' are
identified on the ITAR's U.S. Munitions List (USML) (22 CFR 121.1).
With few exceptions, items not subject to the export control
jurisdiction of the ITAR are subject to the jurisdiction of the Export
Administration Regulations (``EAR,'' 15 CFR parts 730-774, which
includes the Commerce Control List (CCL) in Supplement No. 1 to Part
774), administered by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), U.S.
Department of Commerce. Both the ITAR and the EAR impose license
requirements on exports and reexports. Items not subject to the ITAR or
to the exclusive licensing jurisdiction of any other set of regulations
are subject to the EAR.
Export Control Reform Update
The Departments of State and Commerce described in their respective
Advanced Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in December 2010 the
Administration's plan to make the USML and the CCL positive, tiered,
and aligned so that eventually they can be combined into a single
control list (see ``Commerce Control List: Revising Descriptions of
Items and Foreign Availability,'' 75 FR 76664 (December 9, 2010) and
``Revisions to the United States Munitions List,'' 75 FR 76935
(December 10, 2010)). The notices also called for the establishment of
a ``bright line'' between the USML and the CCL to reduce government and
industry uncertainty regarding export jurisdiction by clarifying
whether particular items are subject to the jurisdiction of the ITAR or
the EAR. While these remain the Administration's ultimate Export
Control Reform objectives, their concurrent implementation would be
problematic in the near term. In order to more quickly reach the
national security objectives of greater interoperability with U.S.
allies, enhancing the defense industrial base, and permitting the U.S.
Government to focus its resources on controlling and monitoring the
export and reexport of more significant items to destinations, end-
uses, and end-users of greater concern than NATO allies and other
multi-regime partners, the Administration has decided, as an interim
step, to propose and implement revisions to both the USML and the CCL
that are more positive, but not yet tiered.
Specifically, based in part on a review of the comments received in
response to the December 2010 notices, the Administration has
determined that fundamentally altering the structure of the USML by
tiering and aligning it on a category-by-category basis would
significantly disrupt the export control compliance systems and
procedures of exporters and reexporters. For example, until the entire
USML was revised and became final, some USML categories would follow
the legacy numbering and control structures while the newly revised
categories would follow a completely different numbering structure. In
order to allow for the national security benefits to flow from re-
aligning the jurisdictional status of defense articles that no longer
warrant control on the USML on a category-by-category basis while
minimizing the impact on exporters' internal control and jurisdictional
and classification marking systems, the Administration plans to proceed
with building positive lists now and afterward return to structural
changes.
Revision of Category XI
This proposed rule revises USML Category XI, covering military
electronics, to advance the national security objectives set forth
above and to more accurately describe the articles within the category,
in order to establish a ``bright line'' between the USML and the CCL
for the control of these articles.
Paragraphs (a)(1) (covering underwater hardware, equipment, and
systems), (a)(3) (covering radar systems and equipment), (a)(4)
(covering electronic combat equipment), and (a)(5) (covering C\3\,
C\4\, C\4\ISR, and identification systems and equipment), are amended
to more specifically enumerate the articles controlled therein.
Paragraph (a)(6), which currently controls military computers, is
removed, and the articles controlled therein are transferred to the
jurisdiction of the Department of Commerce under new ECCN 3A611.
Paragraph (a)(8) is added to cover unattended ground sensors.
Paragraph (a)(9) is added to cover electronic sensor systems for
anti-submarine warfare or mine warfare.
Paragraph (a)(10) is added to cover electronic sensor systems for
concealed weapons.
Paragraph (a)(11) is added to cover test sets ``specially
designed'' and programmed for testing counter radio controlled
improvised explosive device electronic warfare systems.
Paragraph (a)(12) is added to cover equipment to process or analyze
Category XI defense articles.
Paragraph (b) (covering electronic systems or equipment for search,
reconnaissance, collection, monitoring, direction finding, display,
analysis, or production of information from the electromagnetic
spectrum and electronic systems or equipment that counteracts
electronic surveillance) is amended to provide consistency with
Wassenaar Munitions List controls while retaining the same catch-all
coverage of the current paragraph (b).
A significant aspect of this more positive, but not yet tiered,
proposed USML category is that it does not contain controls on all
generic parts, components, accessories, and attachments that are
specifically designed or modified for a defense article, regardless of
their significance to maintaining a military advantage for the United
States. Rather, it contains, with
[[Page 70960]]
a few exceptions, a positive list of specific types of parts,
components, accessories, and attachments that continue to warrant
control on the USML. The exceptions pertain to those parts, components,
accessories, and attachments identified as ``specially designed.''
Paragraph (d) is amended to remove reference to Significant
Military Equipment.
Section 121.8 is amended by including a definition for
``equipment'' in new paragraph (h).
Finally, articles common to the Missile Technology Control Regime
(MTCR) Annex and the USML are to be identified on the USML with the
parenthetical ``(MT)'' at the end of each section containing such
articles. A separate proposed rule will address the sections in the
ITAR that include MTCR definitions.
Definition for Specially Designed
Although one of the goals of the export control reform initiative
is to describe USML controls without using design intent criteria, a
few of the controls in the proposed revision nonetheless use the term
``specially designed.'' It is, therefore, necessary for the Department
to define the term. Three proposed definitions have been published to
date. For the purpose of evaluation of this proposed rule, reviewers
should use the definition provided by the Department of State in the
June 19, 2012, proposed rule (77 FR 36428).
Request for Comments
As the U.S. Government works through the proposed revisions to the
USML, some solutions have been adopted that were determined to be the
best of available options. With the thought that multiple perspectives
would be beneficial to the USML revision process, the Department
welcomes the assistance of users of the lists and requests input on the
following:
(1) A key goal of this rulemaking is to ensure the USML and the CCL
together control all the items that meet Wassenaar Arrangement
commitments embodied in Munitions List Category 11 (WA-ML11). To that
end, the public is asked to identify any potential lack of coverage
brought about by the proposed rules for Category XI contained in this
notice and the new Category 3 ECCNs published separately by the
Department of Commerce when reviewed together.
(2) The key goal of this rulemaking is to establish a ``bright
line'' between the USML and the CCL for the control of these materials.
The public is asked to provide specific examples of military
electronics whose jurisdiction would be in doubt based on this
revision.
(3) The current USML Category XI(c) does not control electronic
parts, components, accessories, and attachments ``in normal commercial
use.'' Although the proposed revisions to the USML do not preclude the
possibility that electronic and other items in normal commercial use
would or should be ITAR-controlled because, e.g., they provide the
United States with a critical military or intelligence advantage, the
U.S. Government does not want to inadvertently control items on the
ITAR that are in normal commercial use. The public is thus asked to
provide specific examples of electronics, if any, that would be
controlled by the revised Category XI that are now in normal commercial
use.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the opinion that controlling the
import and export of defense articles and services is a foreign affairs
function of the United States Government and that rules implementing
this function are exempt from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Although the
Department is of the opinion that this rule is exempt from the
rulemaking provisions of the APA, the Department is publishing this
rule with a 60-day provision for public comment and without prejudice
to its determination that controlling the import and export of defense
services is a foreign affairs function. As noted above, and also
without prejudice to the Department position that this rulemaking is
not subject to the APA, the Department previously published a related
Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (RIN 1400-AC78) on December 10,
2010 (75 FR 76935), and accepted comments for 60 days.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since the Department is of the opinion that this rule is exempt
from the rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, it does not require
analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed amendment does not involve a mandate that will result
in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed amendment has been found not to be a major rule
within the meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This proposed amendment will not have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this proposed amendment does not
have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this proposed amendment.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributed impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory
action,'' although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed the proposed amendment in
light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and
[[Page 70961]]
will not preempt tribal law. Accordingly, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to comply with,
a collection of information, subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA), unless
that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control
number. This proposed rule would affect the following approved
collections: (1) Statement of Registration, DS-2032, OMB No. 1405-0002;
(2) Application/License for Permanent Export of Unclassified Defense
Articles and Related Unclassified Technical Data, DSP-5, OMB No. 1405-
0003; (3) Application/License for Temporary Import of Unclassified
Defense Articles, DSP-61, OMB No. 1405-0013; (4) Nontransfer and Use
Certificate, DSP-83, OMB No. 1405-0021; (5) Application/License for
Permanent/Temporary Export or Temporary Import of Classified Defense
Articles and Classified Technical Data, DSP-85, OMB No. 1405-0022; (6)
Application/License for Temporary Export of Unclassified Defense
Articles, DSP-73, OMB No. 1405-0023; (7) Statement of Political
Contributions, Fees, or Commissions in Connection with the Sale of
Defense Articles or Services, OMB No. 1405-0025; (8) Authority to
Export Defense Articles and Services Sold Under the Foreign Military
Sales (FMS) Program, DSP-94, OMB No. 1405-0051; (9) Application for
Amendment to License for Export or Import of Classified or Unclassified
Defense Articles and Related Technical Data, DSP-6, -62, -74, -119, OMB
No. 1405-0092; (10) Request for Approval of Manufacturing License
Agreements, Technical Assistance Agreements, and Other Agreements, DSP-
5, OMB No. 1405-0093; (11) Maintenance of Records by Registrants, OMB
No. 1405-0111; (12) Annual Brokering Report, DS-4142, OMB No. 1405-
0141; (13) Brokering Prior Approval (License), DS-4143, OMB No. 1405-
0142; (14) Projected Sale of Major Weapons in Support of Section
25(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act, DS-4048, OMB No. 1405-0156;
(15) Export Declaration of Defense Technical Data or Services, DS-4071,
OMB No. 1405-0157; (16) Request for Commodity Jurisdiction
Determination, DS-4076, OMB No. 1405-0163; (17) Request to Change End-
User, End-Use, and/or Destination of Hardware, DS-6004, OMB No. 1405-
0173; (18) Request for Advisory Opinion, DS-6001, OMB No. 1405-0174;
(19) Voluntary Disclosure, OMB No. 1405-0179; and (20) Technology
Security/Clearance Plans, Screening Records, and Non-Disclosure
Agreements Pursuant to 22 CFR 126.18, OMB No. 1405-0195. The Department
of State believes there will be minimal changes to these collections.
The Department of State believes the combined effect of all rules to be
published moving commodities from the USML to the EAR as part of the
Administration's Export Control Reform would decrease the number of
license applications by approximately 30,000 annually. The Department
of State is looking for comments on the potential reduction in burden.
List of Subjects in Part 121
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Title 22, Chapter I,
Subchapter M, part 121 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 121--THE UNITED STATES MUNITIONS LIST
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744 (22
U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp.
p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub. L. 105-261, 112 Stat. 1920.
2. Section 121.1 is amended by revising U.S. Munitions List
Category XI to read as follows:
Sec. 121.1 General. The United States Munitions List.
* * * * *
Category XI--Military Electronics
(a) Electronic equipment not included in Category XII of the U.S.
Munitions list, as follows:
(1) Underwater hardware, equipment, or systems, as follows:
(i) Active or passive acoustic array sensing systems or equipment
that survey or detect, and track, localize (i.e., determine range and
bearing), classify, or identify surface vessels, submarines, other
undersea vehicles, torpedoes, or mines having any of the following:
(A) Multi-aspect capability;
(B) Operating frequency less than 20 kHz;
(C) Bandwidth greater than 10 kHz; or
(D) Capable of real-time processing;
(ii) Underwater single acoustic sensor system that distinguishes
tonals and locates the origin of the sound;
(iii) Non-acoustic systems that survey or detect, and track,
localize, classify, or identify surface vessels, submarines, other
undersea vehicles, torpedoes, or mines;
Note to paragraph (a)(1)(iii): Equipment controlled in CCL ECCN
5A001.b.1 is not included.
(iv) Acoustic modems, networks, and communications equipment with
adaptive compensation or employing Low Probability of Intercept (LPI);
Note 1 to paragraph (a)(1)(iv): Adaptive compensation is the
capability of an underwater modem to assess the water conditions to
select the best algorithm to receive and transmit data.
Note 2 to paragraph (a)(1)(iv): The term ``Low Probability of
Intercept'' used in this paragraph and elsewhere in this category is
defined as a class of measures that disguise, delay, or prevent the
interception of acoustic or electromagnetic signals. LPI techniques
can involve permutations of power management, energy management,
frequency variability, out-of-receiver-frequency band, low-side lobe
antenna, complex waveforms, and complex scanning. LPI is also
referred to as Low Probability of Intercept, Low Probability of
Detection, and Low Probability of Identification.
(v) LF/VLF electronic modems, routers, interfaces and
communications equipment ``specially designed'' for submarine
communications; or
(vi) Autonomous processing/control systems and equipment that
enable cooperative sensing and engagement by fixed (bottom mounted/
seabed) or mobile Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs);
(2) Underwater acoustic countermeasures or counter-countermeasures
systems or equipment;
(3) Radar systems and equipment, as follows:
(i) Airborne radar that track targets;
(ii) Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) incorporating image resolution
less than (better than) 0.3 meter, or incorporating Coherent Change
Detection (CCD) with geo-registration accuracy less than (better than)
0.3 meter;
(iii) Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar (ISAR);
(iv) Radar that geo-locates with a target location error 50 (TLE50)
less than or equal to 10 meters;
(v) Any ocean surface surveillance radar with either a product of
transmit peak power times antenna gain divided by minimum detectable
signal of >165 dB, or a capability to distinguish a target of <10 dBsm
from sea clutter with a false alarm rate of 10-6 or better
in sea state 3 or higher, or both;
(vi) Sea surveillance/navigation radar with free space detection of
1 square meter radar cross section (RCS) target at 20 nautical miles
(nmi) or greater range;
(vii) Land or perimeter surveillance radar with free space
detection of 1 square meter RCS target at 5.4 nmi or greater range and
has a revisit rate of faster than once every sixty seconds;
[[Page 70962]]
(viii) Air surveillance radar with free space detection of 1 sq m
RCS target at 85 nmi or greater range or free space detection of 1 sq m
RCS target at an altitude of 65,000 feet and an elevation angle greater
than 20 degrees;
(ix) Air surveillance radar with multiple elevation beams, phase or
amplitude monopulse estimation, or 3D height-finding;
(x) Air surveillance radar with a beam solid angle less than or
equal to 16 degrees\2\ that performs free space tracking of 1 sq m RCS
target at a range greater or equal to 25 nmi with revisit rate greater
or equal to \1/3\ hertz;
(xi) Instrumentation radar for anechoic test facility or outdoor
range to track targets, or provide measure of RCS of static target less
than or equal to -10dBsm, or RCS of dynamic target;
(xii) Radar incorporating pulsed operation with electronics
steering of transmit beam in elevation and azimuth;
(xiii) Radar with mode(s) for ballistic tracking or ballistic
extrapolation to source of launch or impact point of articles
controlled in USML Categories III or IV;
(xiv) Active protection radar and missile warning radar with
mode(s) implemented for detection of incoming munitions;
(xv) Over the horizon high frequency sky-wave (ionosphere) radar;
(xvi) Radar that detects a moving object through a physical
obstruction at distance greater than 0.2 meters from the obstruction;
(xvii) Radar having moving target indicator (MTI) or pulse-Doppler
processing where any single Doppler filter provides a normalized
clutter attenuation of greater than 50dB;
Note to paragraph (a)(3)(xvii): ``Normalized clutter
attenuation'' is defined as the reduction in the power level of
received distributed clutter when normalized to the thermal noise
level.
(xviii) Radar having electronic protection (EP) or electronic
counter-countermeasures (ECCM) other than manual gain control,
automatic gain control, radio frequency selection, constant false alarm
rate, and pulse repetition interval jitter;
(xix) Radar employing electronic attack (EA) mode(s) using the
radar transmitter and antenna;
(xx) Radar employing electronic support (ES) mode(s) (i.e., the
ability to use a radar system for ES purposes in one or more of the
following: As a high-gain receiver, as a wide-bandwidth receiver, as a
multi-beam receiver, or as part of a multi-point system);
(xxi) Radar employing non-cooperative target recognition (NCTR)
(i.e., the ability to recognize a specific platform type without
cooperative action of the target platform);
(xxii) Radar employing automatic target recognition (ATR) (i.e.,
recognition of generic target type using structural features of the
target) with system resolution better than (less than) 0.3 meters;
(xxiii) Radar that sends interceptor guidance commands or provides
illumination keyed to an interceptor seeker;
(xxiv) Radar employing waveform generation for low probability of
intercept (LPI) other than frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW)
with linear ramp modulation;
(xxv) Radar that sends and receives communications;
(xxvi) Radar that tracks or discriminates ballistic missile warhead
from debris or countermeasures;
(xxvii) Bi-static/multi-static radar that exploits greater than 125
kHz bandwidth and is lower than 2 GHz center frequency to passively
detect or track using RF transmissions (e.g., commercial radio or
television stations);
(xxviii) Radar target generators, projectors, or simulators
``specially designed'' for radars controlled by this category; or
(xxix) Radar and laser radar systems ``specially designed'' for
defense articles in (a)(1) of Category IV and (a)(5) and (a)(6) of
Category VIII (MT);
Note to paragraph (a)(3): This category does not control
secondary surveillance radar (SSR) or precision approach radar (PAR)
equipment conforming to ICAO standards and employing electronically
steerable linear (1-dimensional) arrays or mechanically positioned
passive antennae.
(4) Electronic combat equipment, as follows:
(i) Electronic support (ES) systems and equipment that search for,
intercept, and identify, or locate sources of intentional or
unintentional electromagnetic energy for the purpose of immediate
threat detection, recognition, targeting, planning, or conduct of
future operations;
Note to paragraph (a)(4)(i): Electronic Support functions
consist of tactical situational awareness, automatic cueing,
targeting, electronic order of battle planning, electronic
intelligence (ELINT), communication intelligence (COMINT), signals
intelligence (SIGINT).
(ii) Systems and equipment that detect and automatically
discriminate acoustic energy emanating from weapons fire (e.g.,
gunfire, artillery, rocket propelled grenades, or other projectiles),
determining location or direction of weapons fire in less than two
seconds from receipt of event signal, and able to operate on-the-move
(e.g., operating on personnel, land vehicles, sea vessels, or aircraft
while in motion); or
(iii) Systems and equipment ``specially designed'' to introduce
extraneous or erroneous signals into radar, infrared based seekers,
electro-optic based seekers, radio communication receivers, navigation
receivers, or that otherwise hinder the reception, operation, or
effectiveness of adversary electronics (e.g., active or passive
electronic attack, electronic countermeasure, electronic counter-
countermeasure equipment, jamming, and counter jamming equipment);
(5) Command, control, and communications (C\3\), command, control,
communications, and computers (C\4\), command, control, communications,
computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C\4\ISR),
and identification systems or equipment, as follows:
(i) C\3\, C\4\, and C\4\ISR systems ``specially designed'' to
integrate, incorporate, network, or employ defense articles controlled
in this subchapter;
(ii) Identification friend or foe (IFF) systems or equipment
incorporating U.S. government Modes 4 or 5;
(iii) Systems or equipment that implement active or passive
electronic counter-countermeasures (ECCM) used to counter acts of
communication disruption (e.g., radios that incorporate HAVE QUICK I/
II, SINCGARS, SATURN);
(iv) Systems or equipment implementing techniques to suppress
compromising emanations of information bearing signals ``specially
designed'' or certified to meet U.S. Government NSTISSAM TEMPEST 1-92
standards or CNSSAM TEMPEST 01-02; or
(v) Systems or equipment that transmit voice or data signals
``specially designed'' to elude electromagnetic detection;
(6) [Reserved]
(7) Developmental electronic devices, systems, or equipment funded
by the Department of Defense;
Note 1 to paragraph (a)(7): Paragraph XI(a)(7) does not control
developmental electronic devices, systems, or equipment (a)
determined to be subject to the EAR via a commodity jurisdiction
determination (see Sec. 120.4 of this subchapter) or (b) identified
in the relevant Department of Defense contract as being developed
for both civil and military applications.
Note 2 to paragraph (a)(7): Note 1 does not apply to defense
articles enumerated on the
[[Page 70963]]
USML, whether in production or development.
(8) Unattended ground sensor (UGS) systems or equipment having all
of the following:
(i) Automatic target detection;
(ii) Automatic target tracking, classification, recognition, or
identification;
(iii) Self-forming or self-healing networks; and
(iv) Self-localization for geo-locating targets;
(9) Electronic sensor systems or equipment for non-acoustic anti-
submarine warfare (ASW) or mine warfare (e.g., magnetic anomaly
detectors (MAD), electric-field, and electromagnetic induction);
(10) Electronic sensor systems or equipment for detection of
concealed weapons, having a standoff detection range of greater than 45
meters for personnel or detection of vehicle-carried weapons;
(11) Test sets ``specially designed'' and programmed for testing
counter radio controlled improvised explosive device (C-RCIED)
electronic warfare (CREW) systems;
(12) Equipment ``specially designed'' to process or analyze signals
from defense articles controlled by this category; or
(13) Direction finding equipment for determining bearings to
specific electromagnetic sources or terrain characteristics ``specially
designed'' for defense articles in paragraph (a)(1) of Category IV and
paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(6) of Category VIII (MT).
(b) Electronic systems or equipment ``specially designed'' for the
collection, surveillance, monitoring, or exploitation of the
electromagnetic spectrum (regardless of transmission medium), for
intelligence or security purposes or for counteracting such activities.
This includes:
(1) Non-cooperative direction finding systems that have an angle of
arrival (AOA) accuracy better than (less than) two degrees RMS and are
not ``specially designed'' for navigation;
(2) Such systems or equipment that use burst techniques (e.g., time
compression techniques);
(3) Systems and equipment ``specially designed'' for measurement
and signature intelligence (MASINT);
(4) Technical surveillance counter-measure (TSCM) or electronic
surveillance equipment and counter electronic surveillance equipment
(including spectrum analyzers) for the RF/microwave spectrum that:
(i) Sweep or scan speed exceeding 250 MHz per second;
(ii) Have instantaneous bandwidth exceeding 110 MHz;
(iii) Have built-in signal analysis capability;
(iv) Have a volume of less than 1 cubic foot;
(v) Record time-domain or frequency-domain digital signals other
than single trace spectral snapshots; and
(vi) Display time-vs-frequency domain (e.g., waterfall or rising
raster).
(c) Parts, components, accessories, attachments, and associated
equipment, as follows:
(1) Application specific integrated circuits (ASIC) for which the
functionality is ``specially designed'' for defense articles in this
subchapter;
(2) Printed circuit boards or patterned multichip modules for which
the layout is ``specially designed'' for defense articles in this
subchapter;
(3) Transmit/receive modules or transmit modules that have any two
perpendicular sides, with either length d (in cm) equal to or less than
15 divided by the lowest operating frequency in GHz [d<=15cm*GHz/
fGHz], that incorporate a MMIC or discrete RF power
transistor and a phase shifter or phasers;
(4) High-energy storage capacitors with a repetition rate of 6
discharges or more per minute that have any of the following:
(i) Volumetric energy density greater than or equal to 1.3 J/cc;
(ii) Mass energy density greater than or equal to 1.1 kJ/kg; or
(iii) Full energy life greater than or equal to 10,000 discharges;
(5) Radio frequency circulators of any dimension equal to or less
than one quarter (\1/4\) wavelength of the highest operating frequency
and isolation greater than 30dB;
(6) Polarimeter that detects and measures polarization of radio
frequency signals within a single pulse;
(7) Digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) with RF instantaneous
input bandwidth greater than 400 MHz, and 4 bit or higher resolution
and ``specially designed'' parts and components therefor;
(8) Vacuum electronic devices, as follows:
(i) Multiple electron beam or sheet electron beam devices rated for
operation at frequencies of 16 GHz or above, and with a saturated power
output greater than 10,000 W (70 dBm) or a maximum average power output
greater than 3,000 W (65 dBm); or
(ii) Cross-field amplifiers with a gain of 15 dB to 17 dB or a duty
factor greater than 5%;
(9) Antenna, and ``specially designed'' parts and components
therefor, that:
(i) Electronically steer angular beams and nulls with four or more
elements;
(ii) Form adaptive null attenuation greater than 35 dB with
convergence time less than 1 second;
(iii) Detect signals across multiple RF bands with matched left
hand and right hand spiral antenna elements for determination of signal
polarization; or
(iv) Determine signal angle of arrival less than two degrees (e.g.,
interferometer antenna);
(10) Radomes or electromagnetic antenna windows that:
(i) Incorporate radio frequency selective surfaces (MT);
(ii) Operate in multiple or more non-adjacent radar bands (MT);
(iii) Incorporate a structure that is ``specially designed'' to
provide ballistic protection from bullets, shrapnel, or blast (MT);
(iv) Have a melting point greater than 1,300 [deg]C and maintain a
dielectric constant less than 6 at temperatures greater than 500 [deg]C
(MT);
(v) Are manufactured from ceramic materials with a dielectric
constant less than 6 at any frequency from 100 MHz to 100 GHz (MT);
(vi) Maintain structural integrity at stagnation pressures greater
than 6,000 pounds per square foot (MT);
(vii) Withstand combined thermal shock greater than 4.184 x 10\6\
J/m\2\ accompanied by a peak overpressure of greater than 50 kPa (MT);
or
(viii) Are configured to blend with the external geometry of end-
items controlled in Category IV (MT);
(11) Underwater sensors (acoustic vector sensors, hydrophones, or
transducers) or projectors ``specially designed'' for systems
controlled by paragraphs (a)(1) and XI(a)(2) of this category, having
any of the following:
(i) A transmitting frequency below 10 kHz;
(ii) Sound pressure level exceeding 224 dB (reference 1 [mu]Pa at 1
m) for equipment with an operating frequency in the band from 10 kHz to
24 kHz inclusive;
(iii) Sound pressure level exceeding 235 dB (reference 1 [mu]Pa at
1 m) for equipment with an operating frequency in the band between 24
kHz and 30 kHz;
(iv) Forming beams of less than 1[deg] on any axis and having an
operating frequency of less than 100 kHz;
(v) Designed to operate with an unambiguous display range exceeding
5,120 m; or
(vi) Designed to withstand pressure during normal operation at
depths exceeding 1,000 m and having transducers with any of the
following:
(A) Dynamic compensation for pressure; or
[[Page 70964]]
(B) Incorporating other than lead zirconate titanate as the
transduction element;
(12) Parts or components containing piezoelectric materials which
are ``specially designed'' for underwater hardware, equipment, or
systems controlled by paragraph (c)(11) of this category;
(13) Tuners having an instantaneous bandwidth of 30 MHz or greater
and a tuning speed of 300 microseconds or less to within 10 KHz of
desired frequency;
(14) Electronic assemblies and components ``specially designed''
for missiles, rockets, or UAVs capable of achieving a range of at least
300 km and capable of operation at temperatures in excess of 125 [deg]C
(MT);
(15) ``Specially designed'' hybrid (combined analogue/digital)
computers for modeling, simulation, or design integration of systems
enumerated in paragraphs (a)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2), (h)(1), (h)(2),
(h)(4), (h)(8), and (h)(9) of Category IV or paragraphs (a)(5) and
(a)(6) of Category VIII (MT);
(16) Parts, components, or accessories ``specially designed'' to
modify or customize the properties (e.g., operating frequencies,
algorithms, waveforms, CODECs, or modulation/demodulation schemes) of a
radio or information assurance/information security article controlled
in this subchapter beyond what is specified in the public domain or the
published product specifications; or
(17) Any part, component, accessory, attachment, equipment, or
system that (MT for those articles designated as such):
(i) Is classified;
(ii) Contains classified software; or
(iii) Is being developed using classified information.
(iv) Classified means classified pursuant to Executive Order 13526,
or predecessor order, and a security classification guide developed
pursuant thereto or equivalent, or to the corresponding classification
rules of another government or intergovernmental organization.
(d) Technical data (see Sec. 120.10 of this subchapter) and
defense services (see Sec. 120.9 of this subchapter) directly related
to the defense articles enumerated in paragraphs (a) through (c) of
this category and classified technical data directly related to items
controlled in CCL ECCN 9E620 and defense services using the classified
technical data. (See Sec. 125.4 of this subchapter for exemptions.)
(MT for technical data and defense services related to articles
designated as such.)
* * * * *
3. Section 121.8 is amended by revising the section heading and
adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 121.8 End-items, components, accessories, attachments, parts,
firmware, software, systems, and equipment.
* * * * *
(h) Equipment is a combination of parts, components, accessories,
attachments, firmware, or software that operate together to perform a
specialized function of an end-item or a system.
Dated: November 19, 2012.
Andrew J. Shapiro,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-28477 Filed 11-23-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P