Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 70366-70369 [2012-28422]
Download as PDF
70366
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Federal Aviation Administration
Two operators of A330 aeroplanes fitted
with Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines reported
finding extensive damage to engine air intake
cowls as a result of acoustic panel collapse,
most probably caused by panel disbonding.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to the detachment of
the engine air intake cowl from the engine,
possibly resulting in ingestion of parts by,
and consequence damage to, the engine, or
injury to persons on the ground.
For the reasons described above, this
[European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)]
AD requires repetitive special detailed
inspections (tap tests) of the 3 inner acoustic
panels of both engine air intake cowls to
detect any disbonding and, depending on
findings, applicable corrective actions.
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0640; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–203–AD; Amendment
39–17256; AD 2012–22–18]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A330–243, –243F, –341,
–342, and –343 airplanes equipped with
Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines. This AD
was prompted by reports of extensive
damage to engine air intake cowls as a
result of acoustic panel collapse. This
AD requires repetitive inspections of the
three inner acoustic panels of both
engine air intake cowls to detect
disbonding, and corrective actions if
necessary. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct disbonding, which
could result in detachment of the engine
air intake cowl from the engine leading
to ingestion of parts, which could cause
failure of the engine, and possible injury
to persons on the ground.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
December 31, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of December 31, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1138;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on June 21, 2012 (77 FR 37344).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Nov 23, 2012
Jkt 229001
The unsafe condition is detachment of
the engine air intake cowl from the
engine, which could result in ingestion
of parts causing failure of the engine,
and possible injury to persons on the
ground. Corrective actions include
repair or replacement of the affected
engine air intake cowl. You may obtain
further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received.
Request To Change Unsafe Condition
Statement
Airbus stated that the MCAI does not
refer to reduced controllability of the
airplane as a potential consequence, but
to injury to persons on the ground.
We infer that the commenter requests
that we modify the unsafe condition
statement specified in the NPRM (77 FR
37344, June 21, 2012). We agree to
change the unsafe condition statement
in the AD to remove the reference to
reduced airplane controllability. We
have changed the AD accordingly.
Request To Delete References to Airbus
Service Information Appendices
US Airways requested that we delete
references to Appendices 01 and 02 of
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–71–3024, Revision 01, dated
September 27, 2011, in paragraph (h)
and in other locations of the NPRM (77
FR 37344, June 21, 2012). US Airways
stated that Appendix 01 of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–71–
3024, Revision 01, dated September 27,
2011, is simply a form that reports
inspection results to Airbus, and it does
not recommend mandating an
administrative action that is related to
the safety aspect of inspecting the inlet
cowl. US Airways stated that
accomplishing this reporting task is
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
burdensome and does not improve the
safety aspects of the inlet cowl
inspection. US Airways stated that
Appendix 02 of Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A330–71–3024,
Revision 01, dated September 27, 2011,
is simply a Gantt chart outlining
potential man hours and aircraft
downtime needed to complete the
inspection.
We agree to clarify the AD. There are
no references to Appendix 01 and/or
Appendix 02 of Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A330–71–3024,
Revision 01, dated September 27, 2011,
in paragraph (h) or any other regulatory
section of the AD. However, we have
revised the references to this service
information in paragraphs (g), (h), (l),
and (m) of this AD to exclude
Appendices 01 through 03, because the
information provided in those
appendices is not necessary to
accomplish the requirements of this AD.
We consider Appendix 03 of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–71–
3024, Revision 01, dated September 27,
2011, unnecessary to accomplish the
requirements of this AD, because it is a
Gantt chart outlining elapsed time
assumptions for the actions described in
that service information.
Request To Delete References to RollsRoyce Service Information Appendix
US Airways requested that we state in
the NPRM (77 FR 37344, June 21, 2012)
that Appendix 1 of Rolls-Royce NonModification Service Bulletin RB.211–
71–AG419, Revision 1, dated May 10,
2011, does not need to be accomplished.
US Airways stated that Appendix 1 of
Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service
Bulletin RB.211–71–AG419, Revision 1,
dated May 10, 2011, noted that
accomplishing of this service
information should be marked on the
engine air inlet cowl label plate and that
Rolls-Royce and/or Bombardier should
be notified of the inspection results. US
Airways stated that it, and most other
operators/carriers in the world, use an
electronic database to issue, track, and
record mandatory inspections on their
airplanes, and, consequently, there is no
need to mandate marking the inspection
service information reference on the
inlet cowl label plate. US Airways also
stated that notification of a Rolls-Royce
or Bombardier representative is
burdensome and does not improve the
safety aspects of the inlet cowl
inspection.
We partially agree. We do not agree to
remove the reference to Appendix 1 of
Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service
Bulletin RB.211–71–AG419, Revision 1,
dated May 10, 2011, because Item 1 of
Appendix 1 specifies that
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
accomplishment of this service
information should be marked on the
engine air inlet cowl label plate using
metal stamp, vibro etch, or electro etch
on the engine air intake cowl
modification plate. Not all operators use
an electronic data base to track
inspections. In case of the airplane
transfer to another operator, this
marking will ensure the evidence of the
accomplishment of required actions. We
agree that Items 2 and 3 of Appendix 1
of Rolls-Royce Non-Modification
Service Bulletin RB.211–71–AG419,
Revision 1, dated May 10, 2011, which
specify reporting, are not necessary. We
have added new paragraph (j) to this AD
to specify that the reporting specified in
Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service
Bulletin RB.211–71–AG419, Revision 1,
including Appendix 1, dated May 10,
2011, is not required by this AD, and
have re-identified subsequent
paragraphs accordingly. We have also
revised paragraph (i) of this AD to
include the paragraph (j) exclusion.
Request To Specify Revised Service
Information
US Airways requested that we revise
paragraph (i) of the NPRM (77 FR 37344,
June 21, 2012) to specify Rolls-Royce
Non-Modification Service Bulletin
RB.211–71–AG419, Revision 1,
including Appendix 1, dated May 10,
2011, as the correct service information.
We agree to revise the reference to
Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service
Bulletin RB.211–71–AG419, Revision 1,
including Appendix 1, dated May 10,
2011, to correctly identify that
document as Revision 1. We have
changed paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(1)(i),
(i)(1)(ii), (i)(1)(iii), (i)(2), and (l)(1)(ii)
(paragraph (k)(1)(ii) of the NPRM (77 FR
37344, June 21, 2012)), of the AD to
correctly reference Rolls-Royce NonModification Service Bulletin RB.211–
71–AG419, Revision 1, including
Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (77 FR
37344, June 21, 2012) for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 37344,
June 21, 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Nov 23, 2012
Jkt 229001
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
22 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 20 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $37,400, or $1,700 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
up to 34 work-hours, for a cost of $2,890
per product. We have received no
definitive data that would enable us to
provide parts cost estimates for the oncondition actions specified in this AD.
We have no way of determining the
number of products that may need these
actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70367
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM (77 FR 37344, June
21, 2012), the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2012–22–18 Airbus: Amendment 39–17256.
Docket No. FAA–2012–0640; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–203–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
effective December 31, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A330–
243, -243F, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes;
certificated in any category; all manufacturer
serial numbers; equipped with Rolls-Royce
Trent 700 engines.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 71, Powerplant.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of
extensive damage to engine air intake cowls
as a result of acoustic panel collapse. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
disbonding, which could result in
detachment of the engine air intake cowl
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
70368
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
from the engine leading to ingestion of parts,
which could cause failure of the engine, and
possible injury to persons on the ground.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Repetitive Detailed Inspection
At the applicable compliance time
specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this
AD: Do a tap test inspection of the three
inner acoustic panels of each engine air
intake cowl for disbonding, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–71–
3024, Revision 01, excluding Appendices 01
through 03, dated September 27, 2011.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 24 months, except as required
by paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD.
(1) For an engine air intake cowl that has
accumulated less than 5,000 total flight
cycles or less than 20,000 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first, since its first
installation on an airplane as of the effective
date of this AD: Within 24 months after the
engine air intake cowl has accumulated 5,000
total flight cycles or 20,000 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first, since its first
installation on an airplane.
(2) For an engine air intake cowl that has
accumulated 5,000 or more total flight cycles
or 20,000 or more total flight hours,
whichever occurs first, since its first
installation on an airplane as of the effective
date of this AD: Within 24 months after the
effective date of this AD.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(h) Inspection of Replaced Engine Air Intake
Cowl
For airplanes on which an engine air intake
cowl is replaced after the effective date of
this AD, at the applicable compliance time
specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this
AD: Do a tap test inspection for disbonding
of the three inner acoustic panels of the
affected engine air intake cowl for
disbonding, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–71–3024,
Revision 01, excluding Appendices 01
through 03, dated September 27, 2011.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 24 months.
(1) Within 24 months after the engine air
intake cowl accumulates 5,000 total flight
cycles or 20,000 total flight hours, whichever
occurs first, since its first installation on any
airplane, except as required by paragraph
(h)(2) of this AD.
(2) Before installation, if an engine air
intake cowl has accumulated 5,000 or more
total flight cycles or 20,000 or more total
flight hours, whichever occurs first, since its
first installation on any airplane, and which
has not been inspected in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–71–3024,
Revision 01, excluding Appendices 01
through 03, dated September 27, 2011,
within the preceding 24 months.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Nov 23, 2012
Jkt 229001
(i) Corrective Actions
(1) If any disbonding is found during any
inspection required by this AD, and the
findings are within the permitted allowable
damage limits (ADLs) specified in RollsRoyce Non-Modification Service Bulletin
RB.211–71–AG419, Revision 1, including
Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011, except as
specified in paragraph (j) of this AD: Do the
actions specified in paragraph (i)(1)(i),
(i)(1)(ii), or (i)(1)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Repeat the tap test inspection required
by paragraph (g) of this AD at the applicable
inspection interval specified in Rolls-Royce
Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211–
71–AG419, Revision 1, including Appendix
1, dated May 10, 2011, except as specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD, until the actions
required by paragraph (i)(1)(ii) or (i)(1)(iii) of
this AD are accomplished.
(ii) Repair the affected engine air intake
cowl before further flight, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of RollsRoyce Non-Modification Service Bulletin
RB.211–71–AG419, Revision 1, including
Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011, except as
specified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Repeat
the inspection specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD thereafter at the applicable
compliance time specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD.
(iii) Replace the affected engine air intake
cowl before further flight, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of RollsRoyce Non-Modification Service Bulletin
RB.211–71–AG419, Revision 1, including
Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011, except as
specified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Repeat
the inspection specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD thereafter at the applicable
compliance time specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD.
(2) If any disbonding is found during any
inspection required by this AD, and the
findings are not within the permitted ADLs
specified in Rolls-Royce Non-Modification
Service Bulletin RB.211–71–AG419, Revision
1, including Appendix 1, dated May 10,
2011, except as specified in paragraph (j) of
this AD: Before further flight, replace the
affected engine air intake cowl, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service
Bulletin RB.211–71–AG419, Revision 1,
including Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011,
except as specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD. Repeat the inspection specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD thereafter at the
applicable compliance time specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD.
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2011–0173, dated September 13,
2011, and the service information specified
in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) and (l)(1)(ii) of this AD,
for related information.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–71–3024, Revision 01, excluding
Appendices 01 through 03, dated September
27, 2011.
(ii) Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service
Bulletin RB.211–71–AG419, Revision 1,
including Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011.
(j) No Reporting Requirement
Although Rolls-Royce Non-Modification
Service Bulletin RB.211–71–AG419, Revision
1, including Appendix 1, dated May 10,
2011, specifies to submit certain information
to the manufacturer, this AD does not
include that requirement.
(2) For Airbus service information
identified in this AD, contact Airbus
SAS—Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5
61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.330-A3A40@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. For
Rolls-Royce service information
identified in this AD, contact RollsRoyce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24
8BJ, England; telephone 011 44 1332
242424; fax 011 44 1332 249936;
Internet https://www.aeromanager.com.
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) of the service
information listed in this paragraph
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(2) You must use this service
information as applicable to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–71–3024, Revision 01, excluding
Appendices 01 through 03, dated
September 27, 2011.
(ii) Rolls-Royce Non-Modification
Service Bulletin RB.211–71–AG419,
Revision 1, including Appendix 1, dated
May 10, 2011.
(3) For Airbus service information
identified in this AD, contact Airbus
SAS—Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5
61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. For
Rolls-Royce service information
identified in this AD, contact RollsRoyce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24
8BJ, England; telephone 011 44 1332
242424; fax 011 44 1332 249936;
Internet https://www.aeromanager.com.
(4) You may review copies of the
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service
information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
31, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–28422 Filed 11–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0676; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–182–AD; Amendment
39–17266; AD 2012–23–10]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Nov 23, 2012
Jkt 229001
Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and
A321 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of the escape slide
of the raft inflation system not
deploying when activated due to the
rotation of the cable guide in a direction
which resulted in jamming of the
inflation control cable. This AD requires
modifying the affected slide rafts. We
are issuing this AD to prevent nondeployment of the inflation system of
the escape slide raft, which could result
in delayed evacuation from the airplane
during an emergency, and consequent
injury to the passengers.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
December 31, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of December 31, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1405; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on July 2, 2012 (77 FR 39186).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
states:
Two occurrences on Airbus A320
aeroplanes have been reported where the
escape slide raft inflation system did not
deploy when activated, due to the rotation of
the cable guide in a direction which resulted
in jamming of the inflation control cable.
Additionally, there has been one reported
case where the system did not deploy
properly due to a cracked inflation hose
fitting.
Investigation conducted by the slide raft
manufacturer showed that the hose fitting
could be subject to a bending moment if
improperly packed. Subsequently, the hose
fitting could separate from the reservoir and
the inflation of the slide raft may be
impaired.
This condition, if not corrected, could
delay the evacuation from the aeroplane in
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70369
case of emergency, possibly resulting in
injury to the occupants.
For the reasons described above, this
[European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)]
AD requires modification of the affected slide
rafts or [optional] replacement thereof with
modified units.
*
*
*
*
*
The modification includes installing a
cable guide adaptor, an anti-rotation
bracket, and a new hose assembly. You
may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received.
United Airlines (UAL) supports the
compliance time of 36 months after the
effective date of this AD.
Request To Clarify Concurrent
Requirements
UAL requested we highlight that Air
Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B.A320 004–
25–85 has a concurrent requirement to
accomplish Air Cruisers Service
Bulletin S.B.A320 004–25–56. UAL
stated that it would like to receive a
confirmation that Air Cruisers Service
Bulletin S.B.A320 004–25–56 must also
be accomplished to comply with the
proposed AD (77 FR 39186, July 2,
2012).
We agree with UAL’s comment. For
the optional replacement in paragraph
(h) of this final rule, we have clarified
that the concurrent requirement
specified in paragraph 1.B. of Air
Cruisers Service Bulletin S.B. A320
004–25–85, Revision 2, dated January 3,
2012, is necessary. We have revised
paragraphs (h), (j)(1), and (j)(2) in this
final rule accordingly.
Request To Remove the Parts
Installation Limitation in Paragraph
(j)(1) of the Proposed AD (77 FR 39186,
July 2, 2012)
UAL requested that the parts
installation limitation in paragraph (j)(1)
of the proposed AD (77 FR 39186, July
2, 2012) be removed. UAL stated that
the proposed requirement will remove
the operator’s flexibility to replace a
post-AD part number with a pre-AD part
number prior to the AD limit. UAL
stated that, after the proposed AD
effective date, it agrees that any new
slide-rafts released by the home shop
should have the AD requirements
incorporated to prevent unit on-wing
installation beyond the AD limit, but
not on the ones currently installed onwing. UAL stated that it believes the
intent of the proposed AD is to
eliminate pre-AD part numbers after 36
months of the effective date.
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 227 (Monday, November 26, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70366-70369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28422]
[[Page 70366]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0640; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-203-AD;
Amendment 39-17256; AD 2012-22-18]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A330-243, -243F, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes equipped
with Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines. This AD was prompted by reports of
extensive damage to engine air intake cowls as a result of acoustic
panel collapse. This AD requires repetitive inspections of the three
inner acoustic panels of both engine air intake cowls to detect
disbonding, and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct disbonding, which could result in detachment of
the engine air intake cowl from the engine leading to ingestion of
parts, which could cause failure of the engine, and possible injury to
persons on the ground.
DATES: This AD becomes effective December 31, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of December 31,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1138;
fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on June 21, 2012 (77 FR
37344). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Two operators of A330 aeroplanes fitted with Rolls-Royce Trent
700 engines reported finding extensive damage to engine air intake
cowls as a result of acoustic panel collapse, most probably caused
by panel disbonding.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to the
detachment of the engine air intake cowl from the engine, possibly
resulting in ingestion of parts by, and consequence damage to, the
engine, or injury to persons on the ground.
For the reasons described above, this [European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA)] AD requires repetitive special detailed inspections
(tap tests) of the 3 inner acoustic panels of both engine air intake
cowls to detect any disbonding and, depending on findings,
applicable corrective actions.
The unsafe condition is detachment of the engine air intake cowl from
the engine, which could result in ingestion of parts causing failure of
the engine, and possible injury to persons on the ground. Corrective
actions include repair or replacement of the affected engine air intake
cowl. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the
AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Request To Change Unsafe Condition Statement
Airbus stated that the MCAI does not refer to reduced
controllability of the airplane as a potential consequence, but to
injury to persons on the ground.
We infer that the commenter requests that we modify the unsafe
condition statement specified in the NPRM (77 FR 37344, June 21, 2012).
We agree to change the unsafe condition statement in the AD to remove
the reference to reduced airplane controllability. We have changed the
AD accordingly.
Request To Delete References to Airbus Service Information Appendices
US Airways requested that we delete references to Appendices 01 and
02 of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-71-3024, Revision 01,
dated September 27, 2011, in paragraph (h) and in other locations of
the NPRM (77 FR 37344, June 21, 2012). US Airways stated that Appendix
01 of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-71-3024, Revision 01,
dated September 27, 2011, is simply a form that reports inspection
results to Airbus, and it does not recommend mandating an
administrative action that is related to the safety aspect of
inspecting the inlet cowl. US Airways stated that accomplishing this
reporting task is burdensome and does not improve the safety aspects of
the inlet cowl inspection. US Airways stated that Appendix 02 of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-71-3024, Revision 01, dated September
27, 2011, is simply a Gantt chart outlining potential man hours and
aircraft downtime needed to complete the inspection.
We agree to clarify the AD. There are no references to Appendix 01
and/or Appendix 02 of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-71-3024,
Revision 01, dated September 27, 2011, in paragraph (h) or any other
regulatory section of the AD. However, we have revised the references
to this service information in paragraphs (g), (h), (l), and (m) of
this AD to exclude Appendices 01 through 03, because the information
provided in those appendices is not necessary to accomplish the
requirements of this AD. We consider Appendix 03 of Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A330-71-3024, Revision 01, dated September 27, 2011,
unnecessary to accomplish the requirements of this AD, because it is a
Gantt chart outlining elapsed time assumptions for the actions
described in that service information.
Request To Delete References to Rolls-Royce Service Information
Appendix
US Airways requested that we state in the NPRM (77 FR 37344, June
21, 2012) that Appendix 1 of Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service
Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1, dated May 10, 2011, does not need
to be accomplished. US Airways stated that Appendix 1 of Rolls-Royce
Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1, dated
May 10, 2011, noted that accomplishing of this service information
should be marked on the engine air inlet cowl label plate and that
Rolls-Royce and/or Bombardier should be notified of the inspection
results. US Airways stated that it, and most other operators/carriers
in the world, use an electronic database to issue, track, and record
mandatory inspections on their airplanes, and, consequently, there is
no need to mandate marking the inspection service information reference
on the inlet cowl label plate. US Airways also stated that notification
of a Rolls-Royce or Bombardier representative is burdensome and does
not improve the safety aspects of the inlet cowl inspection.
We partially agree. We do not agree to remove the reference to
Appendix 1 of Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-71-
AG419, Revision 1, dated May 10, 2011, because Item 1 of Appendix 1
specifies that
[[Page 70367]]
accomplishment of this service information should be marked on the
engine air inlet cowl label plate using metal stamp, vibro etch, or
electro etch on the engine air intake cowl modification plate. Not all
operators use an electronic data base to track inspections. In case of
the airplane transfer to another operator, this marking will ensure the
evidence of the accomplishment of required actions. We agree that Items
2 and 3 of Appendix 1 of Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin
RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1, dated May 10, 2011, which specify
reporting, are not necessary. We have added new paragraph (j) to this
AD to specify that the reporting specified in Rolls-Royce Non-
Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1, including
Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011, is not required by this AD, and have
re-identified subsequent paragraphs accordingly. We have also revised
paragraph (i) of this AD to include the paragraph (j) exclusion.
Request To Specify Revised Service Information
US Airways requested that we revise paragraph (i) of the NPRM (77
FR 37344, June 21, 2012) to specify Rolls-Royce Non-Modification
Service Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1, including Appendix 1,
dated May 10, 2011, as the correct service information.
We agree to revise the reference to Rolls-Royce Non-Modification
Service Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1, including Appendix 1,
dated May 10, 2011, to correctly identify that document as Revision 1.
We have changed paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(1)(i), (i)(1)(ii), (i)(1)(iii),
(i)(2), and (l)(1)(ii) (paragraph (k)(1)(ii) of the NPRM (77 FR 37344,
June 21, 2012)), of the AD to correctly reference Rolls-Royce Non-
Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1, including
Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 37344, June 21, 2012) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 37344, June 21, 2012).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 22 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 20 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $37,400, or $1,700 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take up to 34 work-hours, for a cost of $2,890 per product. We have
received no definitive data that would enable us to provide parts cost
estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD. We have no
way of determining the number of products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (77 FR 37344, June 21, 2012),
the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2012-22-18 Airbus: Amendment 39-17256. Docket No. FAA-2012-0640;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-203-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December 31,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-243, -243F, -341, -342, and
-343 airplanes; certificated in any category; all manufacturer
serial numbers; equipped with Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 71, Powerplant.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of extensive damage to engine
air intake cowls as a result of acoustic panel collapse. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct disbonding, which could result
in detachment of the engine air intake cowl
[[Page 70368]]
from the engine leading to ingestion of parts, which could cause
failure of the engine, and possible injury to persons on the ground.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Repetitive Detailed Inspection
At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph (g)(1)
or (g)(2) of this AD: Do a tap test inspection of the three inner
acoustic panels of each engine air intake cowl for disbonding, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A330-71-3024, Revision 01, excluding Appendices 01
through 03, dated September 27, 2011. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 months, except as required
by paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD.
(1) For an engine air intake cowl that has accumulated less than
5,000 total flight cycles or less than 20,000 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first, since its first installation on an airplane
as of the effective date of this AD: Within 24 months after the
engine air intake cowl has accumulated 5,000 total flight cycles or
20,000 total flight hours, whichever occurs first, since its first
installation on an airplane.
(2) For an engine air intake cowl that has accumulated 5,000 or
more total flight cycles or 20,000 or more total flight hours,
whichever occurs first, since its first installation on an airplane
as of the effective date of this AD: Within 24 months after the
effective date of this AD.
(h) Inspection of Replaced Engine Air Intake Cowl
For airplanes on which an engine air intake cowl is replaced
after the effective date of this AD, at the applicable compliance
time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD: Do a tap
test inspection for disbonding of the three inner acoustic panels of
the affected engine air intake cowl for disbonding, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330-71-3024, Revision 01, excluding Appendices 01 through
03, dated September 27, 2011. Repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 24 months.
(1) Within 24 months after the engine air intake cowl
accumulates 5,000 total flight cycles or 20,000 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first, since its first installation on any
airplane, except as required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD.
(2) Before installation, if an engine air intake cowl has
accumulated 5,000 or more total flight cycles or 20,000 or more
total flight hours, whichever occurs first, since its first
installation on any airplane, and which has not been inspected in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A330-71-3024, Revision 01, excluding Appendices 01
through 03, dated September 27, 2011, within the preceding 24
months.
(i) Corrective Actions
(1) If any disbonding is found during any inspection required by
this AD, and the findings are within the permitted allowable damage
limits (ADLs) specified in Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service
Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1, including Appendix 1, dated
May 10, 2011, except as specified in paragraph (j) of this AD: Do
the actions specified in paragraph (i)(1)(i), (i)(1)(ii), or
(i)(1)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Repeat the tap test inspection required by paragraph (g) of
this AD at the applicable inspection interval specified in Rolls-
Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1,
including Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011, except as specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD, until the actions required by paragraph
(i)(1)(ii) or (i)(1)(iii) of this AD are accomplished.
(ii) Repair the affected engine air intake cowl before further
flight, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Rolls-
Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1,
including Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011, except as specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD. Repeat the inspection specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD thereafter at the applicable compliance
time specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
(iii) Replace the affected engine air intake cowl before further
flight, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Rolls-
Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1,
including Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011, except as specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD. Repeat the inspection specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD thereafter at the applicable compliance
time specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) If any disbonding is found during any inspection required by
this AD, and the findings are not within the permitted ADLs
specified in Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-
71-AG419, Revision 1, including Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011,
except as specified in paragraph (j) of this AD: Before further
flight, replace the affected engine air intake cowl, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Rolls-Royce Non-Modification
Service Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419, Revision 1, including Appendix 1,
dated May 10, 2011, except as specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Repeat the inspection specified in paragraph (g) of this AD
thereafter at the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph
(g) of this AD.
(j) No Reporting Requirement
Although Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-
71-AG419, Revision 1, including Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011,
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2011-0173, dated September 13, 2011, and the service
information specified in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) and (l)(1)(ii) of this
AD, for related information.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-71-3024, Revision 01,
excluding Appendices 01 through 03, dated September 27, 2011.
(ii) Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-71-
AG419, Revision 1, including Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011.
(2) For Airbus service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80; email airworthiness.330-A3A40@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. For Rolls-Royce service information identified in this
AD, contact Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ, England;
telephone 011 44 1332 242424; fax 011 44 1332 249936; Internet https://www.aeromanager.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation
by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
[[Page 70369]]
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-71-3024, Revision 01,
excluding Appendices 01 through 03, dated September 27, 2011.
(ii) Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-71-AG419,
Revision 1, including Appendix 1, dated May 10, 2011.
(3) For Airbus service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80; email airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. For Rolls-Royce service information identified in this
AD, contact Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ, England;
telephone 011 44 1332 242424; fax 011 44 1332 249936; Internet https://www.aeromanager.com.
(4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-
741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 31, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-28422 Filed 11-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P