Special Conditions: Embraer S.A., Model EMB-550 Airplane; Design Roll Maneuver for Electronic Flight Controls, 70384-70385 [2012-28386]
Download as PDF
70384
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(e) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOC)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Chinh Vuong,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management
Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email chinh.
vuong@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(f) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
No. 2011–0190, dated September 30, 2011.
(g) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 2810, fuel storage.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November
8, 2012.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–28435 Filed 11–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1241; Notice No. 25–
12–15–SC]
Special Conditions: Embraer S.A.,
Model EMB–550 Airplane; Design Roll
Maneuver for Electronic Flight
Controls
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for the Embraer S.A. Model
EMB–550 airplane. This airplane will
have a novel or unusual design
feature(s) associated with the design roll
maneuver for electronic flight controls,
specifically an electronic flight control
system that provides control of the
aircraft through pilot inputs to the flight
computer. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These proposed special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:01 Nov 23, 2012
Jkt 229001
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send your comments on or
before January 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number [FAA–2012–1241]
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 8
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.
dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Martin, FAA, Airframe and Cabin
Safety Branch, ANM–115, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington, 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1178; facsimile
425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Background
On May 14, 2009, Embraer S.A.
applied for a type certificate for their
new Model EMB–550 airplane. The
Model EMB–550 airplane is the first of
a new family of jet airplanes designed
for corporate flight, fractional, charter,
and private owner operations. The
aircraft has a conventional configuration
with low wing and T-tail empennage.
The primary structure is metal with
composite empennage and control
surfaces. The Model EMB–550 airplane
is designed for 8 passengers, with a
maximum of 12 passengers. It is
equipped with two Honeywell
HTF7500–E medium bypass ratio
turbofan engines mounted on aft
fuselage pylons. Each engine produces
approximately 6,540 pounds of thrust
for normal takeoff. The primary flight
controls consist of hydraulically
powered fly-by-wire elevators, ailerons,
and rudder, controlled by the pilot or
copilot sidestick.
The flight control system for the
Model EMB–550 airplane does not have
a direct mechanical link or a linear gain
between the airplane flight control
surface and the pilot’s cockpit control
device, which is not accounted for in
Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) 25.349(a). Instead, a flight
control computer commands the
airplane flight control surfaces, based on
input received from the cockpit control
device. The pilot input is modified by
the flight control computer before the
command is given to the flight control
surface.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Embraer S.A. must show that the Model
EMB–550 airplane meets the applicable
provisions of part 25, as amended by
Amendments 25–1 through 25–127
thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model EMB–500 airplane
because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 227 / Monday, November 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would also apply to the other
model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model EMB–550
airplane must comply with the fuel vent
and exhaust emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36 and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under
§ 611 of Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise
Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type-certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model EMB–550 airplane will
incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: The Model
EMB–550 airplane is equipped with an
electronic flight control system that
provides control of the aircraft through
pilot inputs to the flight computer.
Current part 25 airworthiness
regulations account for ‘‘control laws’’
where aileron deflection is proportional
to control stick deflection. They do not
address any nonlinearities, i.e.,
situations where output does not change
in the same proportion as input, or other
effects on aileron actuation that may be
caused by electronic flight controls.
Discussion
These special conditions differ from
current regulatory requirements in that
they require that the roll maneuver
result from defined movements of the
cockpit roll control as opposed to
defined aileron deflections. Also, these
special conditions require an additional
load condition at design maneuvering
speed (VA), in which the cockpit roll
control is returned to neutral following
the initial roll input.
These special conditions differ from
similar special conditions previously
issued on this topic. These special
conditions are limited to the roll axis
only, whereas other special conditions
also included pitch and yaw axes.
Special conditions are no longer needed
for the yaw axis because 14 CFR 25.351
was revised at Amendment 25–91 to
take into account effects of an electronic
flight control system. No special
conditions are needed for the pitch axis
because the method that Embraer S.A.
proposed for the pitch maneuver takes
into account effects of an electronic
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Nov 23, 2012
Jkt 229001
flight control system. These proposed
special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Model
EMB–550 airplane. Should Embraer
S.A. apply at a later date for a change
to the type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
EMB–550 of airplanes. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
70385
(b) At VA, sudden movement of the
cockpit roll control up to the limit is
assumed. The position of the cockpit
roll control must be maintained until a
steady roll rate is achieved and then
must be returned suddenly to the
neutral position.
(c) At VC, the cockpit roll control
must be moved suddenly and
maintained so as to achieve a roll rate
not less than that obtained in paragraph
(b).
(d) At VD, the cockpit roll control
must be moved suddenly and
maintained so as to achieve a roll rate
not less than one third of that obtained
in paragraph (b).
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 16, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–28386 Filed 11–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for Embraer
S.A. Model EMB–550 airplanes.
1. Design Roll Maneuver for
Electronic Flight Controls.
In lieu of compliance to 14 CFR
25.349(a), the Embraer S.A. Model
EMB–550 airplane must comply with
the following.
The following conditions, speeds, and
cockpit roll control motions (except as
the motions may be limited by pilot
effort) must be considered in
combination with an airplane load
factor of zero and of two-thirds of the
positive maneuvering factor used in
design. In determining the resulting
control surface deflections, the torsional
flexibility of the wing must be
considered in accordance with 14 CFR
25.301(b).
(a) Conditions corresponding to
steady rolling velocities must be
investigated. In addition, conditions
corresponding to maximum angular
acceleration must be investigated for
airplanes with engines or other weight
concentrations outboard of the fuselage.
For the angular acceleration conditions,
zero rolling velocity may be assumed in
the absence of a rational time history
investigation of the maneuver.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
37 CFR Part 3
[Docket No. PTO–P–2012–0047]
Notice of Roundtable on Proposed
Requirements for Recordation of RealParty-in-Interest Information
Throughout Application Pendency and
Patent Term
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) is
considering promulgating regulations
that would require greater public
transparency concerning the ownership
of patent applications and patents by
requiring the provision of real-party-ininterest information during patent
prosecution and at certain times postissuance. As part of this initiative, the
USPTO is conducting a roundtable to
obtain public input from organizations
and individuals on how the USPTO
could change its rules of practice to
collect and provide such ownership
information and make it publicly
available. The USPTO plans to invite a
number of roundtable participants from
among patent user groups, practitioners,
industry, independent inventor
organizations, academia, and
government. The roundtable also is
open for any member of the public to
provide input.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 227 (Monday, November 26, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70384-70385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28386]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2012-1241; Notice No. 25-12-15-SC]
Special Conditions: Embraer S.A., Model EMB-550 Airplane; Design
Roll Maneuver for Electronic Flight Controls
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Embraer S.A.
Model EMB-550 airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual
design feature(s) associated with the design roll maneuver for
electronic flight controls, specifically an electronic flight control
system that provides control of the aircraft through pilot inputs to
the flight computer. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send your comments on or before January 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number [FAA-2012-1241]
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Martin, FAA, Airframe and Cabin
Safety Branch, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington, 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-1178; facsimile 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We may change these special conditions based on the
comments we receive.
Background
On May 14, 2009, Embraer S.A. applied for a type certificate for
their new Model EMB-550 airplane. The Model EMB-550 airplane is the
first of a new family of jet airplanes designed for corporate flight,
fractional, charter, and private owner operations. The aircraft has a
conventional configuration with low wing and T-tail empennage. The
primary structure is metal with composite empennage and control
surfaces. The Model EMB-550 airplane is designed for 8 passengers, with
a maximum of 12 passengers. It is equipped with two Honeywell HTF7500-E
medium bypass ratio turbofan engines mounted on aft fuselage pylons.
Each engine produces approximately 6,540 pounds of thrust for normal
takeoff. The primary flight controls consist of hydraulically powered
fly-by-wire elevators, ailerons, and rudder, controlled by the pilot or
copilot sidestick.
The flight control system for the Model EMB-550 airplane does not
have a direct mechanical link or a linear gain between the airplane
flight control surface and the pilot's cockpit control device, which is
not accounted for in Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
25.349(a). Instead, a flight control computer commands the airplane
flight control surfaces, based on input received from the cockpit
control device. The pilot input is modified by the flight control
computer before the command is given to the flight control surface.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Embraer S.A. must show that
the Model EMB-550 airplane meets the applicable provisions of part 25,
as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-127 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model EMB-500 airplane because of
a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they
[[Page 70385]]
are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended later
to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model EMB-550 airplane must comply with the fuel vent
and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36 and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type-
certification basis under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model EMB-550 airplane will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: The Model EMB-550 airplane is equipped with an
electronic flight control system that provides control of the aircraft
through pilot inputs to the flight computer. Current part 25
airworthiness regulations account for ``control laws'' where aileron
deflection is proportional to control stick deflection. They do not
address any nonlinearities, i.e., situations where output does not
change in the same proportion as input, or other effects on aileron
actuation that may be caused by electronic flight controls.
Discussion
These special conditions differ from current regulatory
requirements in that they require that the roll maneuver result from
defined movements of the cockpit roll control as opposed to defined
aileron deflections. Also, these special conditions require an
additional load condition at design maneuvering speed (VA),
in which the cockpit roll control is returned to neutral following the
initial roll input.
These special conditions differ from similar special conditions
previously issued on this topic. These special conditions are limited
to the roll axis only, whereas other special conditions also included
pitch and yaw axes. Special conditions are no longer needed for the yaw
axis because 14 CFR 25.351 was revised at Amendment 25-91 to take into
account effects of an electronic flight control system. No special
conditions are needed for the pitch axis because the method that
Embraer S.A. proposed for the pitch maneuver takes into account effects
of an electronic flight control system. These proposed special
conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Model EMB-550 airplane. Should Embraer S.A. apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model EMB-550 of airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for Embraer S.A. Model EMB-550 airplanes.
1. Design Roll Maneuver for Electronic Flight Controls.
In lieu of compliance to 14 CFR 25.349(a), the Embraer S.A. Model
EMB-550 airplane must comply with the following.
The following conditions, speeds, and cockpit roll control motions
(except as the motions may be limited by pilot effort) must be
considered in combination with an airplane load factor of zero and of
two-thirds of the positive maneuvering factor used in design. In
determining the resulting control surface deflections, the torsional
flexibility of the wing must be considered in accordance with 14 CFR
25.301(b).
(a) Conditions corresponding to steady rolling velocities must be
investigated. In addition, conditions corresponding to maximum angular
acceleration must be investigated for airplanes with engines or other
weight concentrations outboard of the fuselage. For the angular
acceleration conditions, zero rolling velocity may be assumed in the
absence of a rational time history investigation of the maneuver.
(b) At VA, sudden movement of the cockpit roll control
up to the limit is assumed. The position of the cockpit roll control
must be maintained until a steady roll rate is achieved and then must
be returned suddenly to the neutral position.
(c) At VC, the cockpit roll control must be moved
suddenly and maintained so as to achieve a roll rate not less than that
obtained in paragraph (b).
(d) At VD, the cockpit roll control must be moved
suddenly and maintained so as to achieve a roll rate not less than one
third of that obtained in paragraph (b).
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 16, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-28386 Filed 11-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P