Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Program Timberland Environmental Impact Report Associated With an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for Mendocino Redwood Company's Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan, Mendocino County, CA, 70145-70147 [2012-28489]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2012 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service RIN 0648–XC275 Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Program Timberland Environmental Impact Report Associated With an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for Mendocino Redwood Company’s Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan, Mendocino County, CA National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce; Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability and receipt of application. AGENCY: This notice announces the availability of the draft Mendocino Redwood Company Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan (Proposed Plan), draft Implementing Agreement, and draft Environmental Impact Statement/Program Timberland Environmental Impact Report (EIS/ PTEIR) for public review and comment. In response to receipt of an application from The Mendocino Redwood Company (MRC; Applicant), the National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Services) are considering the proposed action of issuing an 80-year incidental take permit for nine federally listed species and two currently unlisted species. The proposed permit would authorize take of individual members of species listed under section 10 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531–1544, 87 Stat. 884), as amended. The permit is needed because take of species could occur during timber harvest, forest management, and related activities within the 213,244acre Proposed Plan Area in western Mendocino County, CA. DATES: Two public meetings will be held: Tuesday, December 11, 2012, from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. (Ukiah, California), and Wednesday, December 12, 2012, from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. (Fort Bragg, California). Written comments should be received on or before February 21, 2013. ADDRESSES: The public meetings will be held at: Redwood Empire Fair Fine Arts Building, 1055 North State Street, mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:03 Nov 21, 2012 Jkt 229001 Ukiah, CA 95482; and at C.V. Starr Center, 300 S. Lincoln St., Fort Bragg, CA 95437. Send comments by mail or facsimile to: (1) Eric Shott, National Marine Fisheries Service, 777 Sonoma Avenue, Room 325, Santa Rosa, CA 95404, facsimile (707) 578–3435; or (2) John Hunter, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, 1655 Heindon Road, Arcata, California 95521, facsimile (707) 822–8411. Send comments by email to mrc.hcpitp@noaa.gov. Copies of all email comments will be routed to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Shott, National Marine Fisheries Service (see ADDRESSES, above, or at 707–575– 6089), or John Hunter, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see ADDRESSES, above, or at 707–822–7201). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Availability of Documents Copies of the draft Proposed Plan, draft Implementing Agreement and draft EIS/PTEIR are available for public review during regular business hours from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the National Marine Fisheries Service (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT); the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT); Mendocino County Library, Fort Bragg Branch Library, 499 Laurel Street, Fort Bragg, CA 95437; and Mendocino County Library, Main Branch Library, 105 North Main Street, Ukiah, CA 95482. Individuals wishing to obtain copies of the draft Proposed Plan, draft Implementing Agreement, and draft EIS/ PTEIR should contact either of the Services by telephone (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or by letter (see ADDRESSES). These documents also are available on the NMFS’ Southwest Region Web site at https:// swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/nepa.htm and the Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office Web site at https://www.fws.gov/arcata/. Public Involvement The initial Notice of Intent to prepare an draft EIS/EIR for this project was published in the Federal Register on June 6, 2002 (67 FR 38932), and public scoping meetings were held on June 25, June 26, and June 27, 2002. Background Information Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and Federal regulations prohibit the take of fish and wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened by either of the Services (16 U.S.C. 1538). The ESA defines the term PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 70145 ‘‘take’’ as to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1532). Harm includes significant habitat modification or degradation that actually kills or injures listed wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, and sheltering [50 CFR 17.3(c)]. Pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA, the Services may issue permits to authorize incidental take of listed fish or wildlife; i.e., take that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing incidental take permits for threatened and endangered species are found in 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22, respectively. Although take of listed plant species is not prohibited under the ESA, and therefore cannot be authorized under an incidental take permit, plant species may be included on a permit in recognition of the conservation benefits provided to them under a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). All species included on an incidental take permit would receive assurances under the Services ‘‘No Surprises’’ regulation 50 CFR 17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5). The application for an incidental take permit was prepared and submitted by Mendocino Redwood Company (Applicant). The Applicant has prepared an HCP to satisfy the application requirements for a section 10(a)(1)(B) permit under the ESA, a section 2835 permit under the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act of 2002 (NCCPA), and for compliance with California Code of Regulations 14 §§ 916.9(w)(3)–(4), 919.9(d), 919.11, and 1092.21(d) under the California Forest Practice Rules (FPRs). Thus, the Proposed Plan constitutes an HCP pursuant to the ESA, and a Natural Community Conservation Plan pursuant to the California NCCPA. The Applicant seeks an 80-year incidental take permit for covered activities within a proposed 213,244 acre Plan Area located entirely in Mendocino County, California. The Proposed Plan Area includes commercial timberlands owned by Mendocino Redwood Company that are located west of U.S. Route 101, and includes portions of the Albion, Big, Garcia, South Fork Eel, Navarro, Noyo, and upper Russian River river watersheds, as well as portions of Cottaneva, Howard, Hardy, Juan, Alder, Elk, Greenwood, and Mallo Pass creek watersheds. The Applicant has requested permits that will authorize take of nine animals listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA and two species that are E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 70146 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2012 / Notices not currently listed under the Act. The following five listed species are proposed for coverage under the NMFS permit: Coho salmon (Southern Oregon/ Northern California Coast Evolutionary Significant Unit [ESU]) (Oncorhynchus kisutch); coho salmon (Central California Coast ESU) (O. kisutch); Chinook salmon (California Coastal ESU) (O. tshawytscha); steelhead (Northern California Distinct Population Segment [DPS]) (O. mykiss); and steelhead (Central California Coast DPS) (O. mykiss). The following four listed species are proposed for coverage under the USFWS permit: California redlegged frog (Rana draytonii); northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina); marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus); and Point Arena mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa nigra). The proposed USFWS permit would also cover two animal species that are not currently listed under the ESA: Northern red-legged frog (R. aurora); and coastal tailed frog (Ascaphus truei). If the Proposed Plan is approved and the permits are issued, take authorization of covered listed species would be effective at the time of permit issuance. Take of the currently nonlisted covered species would be authorized concurrent with the species’ listing under the ESA, should they be listed during the permit period. The Proposed Plan is intended to be a comprehensive document, providing for species conservation and habitat planning, while allowing the Applicant to better manage ongoing forestry operations. The Proposed Plan also is intended to provide a coordinated process for permitting and mitigating the take of covered species as an alternative to the current project-byproject approach. In order to comply with the requirements of the ESA, California Endangered Species Act, the California Natural Community Conservation Act (NCCPA), and the California Forest Practice Rules (FPRs), the Proposed Plan addresses a number of required elements, including: Species and habitat goals and objectives; evaluation of the effects of covered activities on covered species, including indirect and cumulative effects; a conservation strategy; a monitoring and adaptive management program; descriptions of changed circumstances and remedial measures; identification of funding sources; and an assessment of alternatives to take of listed species. Proposed covered activities within the Proposed Plan are all related to forestry operations and include timber felling, transportation, road and landing VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:03 Nov 21, 2012 Jkt 229001 construction, maintenance, development and operation of rock pits and water drafting sites, site preparation, tree planting, thinning and other silvicultural activities, prescribed burning, habitat restoration and improvement, and monitoring and research in the Proposed Plan Area. The Proposed Plan’s conservation strategy was designed to maintain or improve habitat conditions for listed and nonlisted covered species. The Proposed Plan includes minimization measures, such as disturbance buffers and sediment control measures that would avoid or minimize take of covered species from ongoing operations. The Proposed Plan also includes mitigation for take of covered species, including maintenance and enhancement of riparian areas, wetland areas, hardwood stands, and late successional coniferous forest stands. A 1,237-acre Lower Alder Creek Management area also would be established at the outset of the Proposed Plan. The only forest management that would be permitted within this management area would enhance habitat conditions for the marbled murrelet in order to offset any loss of any occupied marbled murrelet habitat that occurs elsewhere in the proposed Plan Area during the permit term. Habitat protected under the Proposed Plan would be monitored, and annual reports documenting the status of the species and compliance with the Proposed Plan would be submitted to the Services. National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Proposed permit issuance triggers the need for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Accordingly, a joint NEPA/ CEQA document has been prepared. As co-lead Federal agencies, the Services have responsibility for compliance under NEPA and are providing notice of the availability of the draft EIS/PTEIR, which evaluates the impacts of proposed issuance of the permit and implementation of the Proposed Plan, as well as a reasonable range of alternatives. The draft EIS/PTEIR analyzes five alternatives, including the Proposed Plan, described above. The five alternatives being considered by the Services are the following: Proposed Plan Alternative: Under this alternative, the Proposed Plan as described above would be adopted. The Applicant would receive an 80-year incidental take permit for 11 species PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA and Section 2835 of the NCCPA. No Action Alternative: Under this alternative, the Proposed Plan would not be adopted, and permits pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA and Section 2835 of the NCCPA would not be issued by the Services and California Department of Fish and Game, respectively. The Applicant would operate under existing California Forest Practice Rules and seek compliance with Federal and California ESAs on a case-by-case basis. Alternative A: Under this enhanced HCP alternative, the permit term and species covered would be the same as under the Proposed Plan, but there would be additional measures to enhance conservation of key aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Additional measures would include some larger protective streamside buffers and higher tree retention standards. Alternative B: Under this terrestrial reserves alternative, the permit term would be the same as under the Proposed Plan, but only two terrestrial species (northern spotted owl and marbled murrelet) would be covered, and the minimization and mitigation for the take of covered species would be largely achieved via a system of speciesspecific no-harvest reserves. Unlike the other alternatives, non-reserve lands would be managed in a manner that emphasizes even-aged management of timber stands. Under this alternative, the California permit issued would not be under the NCCPA, but rather under Section 2080.1 or 2081 of the California Fish and Game Code. Alternative C: Under this alternative, the Federal and California permits would be issued for only 40 years, during which time lands would be managed as under the Proposed Plan. After 40 years, land would be managed as under the No Action Alternative. Point Arena mountain beaver, northern red-legged frog, and coastal tailed frog would not be included as covered species on the take permits. Under this alternative, the California permit issued would not be under the NCCPA, but rather under Section 2080.1 or 2081 of the California Fish and Game Code. Public Comments The Services invite the public to comment on the draft Proposed Plan, draft implementing agreement, and draft EIS/PTEIR during a 90-day public comment period beginning on the date of this notice. All comments received, including names and addresses, will become part of the administrative record and may be made available to the public. E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2012 / Notices Comments submitted in an email will be accepted provided they do not exceed 6 megabytes in size and are virus free. Hypertext email links to other Web pages or publications shall not be deemed the equivalent of written comment. The Services will evaluate the applications, associated documents, and comments submitted to them to prepare a final EIS/PTEIR. A permit decision will be made no sooner than 30 days after the publication of the final EIS/ PTEIR. This notice is provided pursuant to section 10(a) of the ESA and Service regulations for implementing NEPA, as amended (40 CFR 1506.6). We provide this notice in order to allow the public, agencies, or other organizations to review and comment on these documents. Dated: November 19, 2012. Alexander Pitts, Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, USFWS. Dated: November 19, 2012. Angela Somma, Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2012–28489 Filed 11–21–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P; 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fish and Wildlife Service 0648–XB088 Environmental Impact Statement; Availability: Authorization for Incidental Take and Implementation of the Stanford University Habitat Conservation Plan National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce; Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability of final environmental impact statement, multispecies habitat conservation plan, and implementing agreement. AGENCY: This notice announces the availability for public review of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for Authorization for Incidental Take and Implementation of the Stanford University Habitat Conservation Plan; the Stanford University Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP); and the Implementing Agreement (IA). Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:03 Nov 21, 2012 Jkt 229001 (NEPA), this notice advises the public that we, the USFWS and NMFS (collectively the Services), have received applications for 50-year Incidental Take Permits (ITPs) pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA) from the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University (Stanford; Applicant). The Applicant seeks the ITPs to authorize incidental take of the covered species that could occur as a result of the proposed covered activities. DATES: Written comments on the FEIS, HCP, and IA, must be received by 5 p.m. Pacific Time on December 24, 2012. ADDRESSES: Comments concerning the FEIS, HCP, and IA can be sent by U.S. Mail, facsimile, or email to (1) Mike Thomas, Division Chief, Conservation Planning Division, Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Room W– 2605, Sacramento, CA 95825, facsimile (916) 414–6713; (2) FW8Stanford_HCP@fws.gov. Include the document identifier: Stanford HCP; (3) Gary Stern, San Francisco Bay Branch Supervisor, National Marine Fisheries Service, North Central California Office, 777 Sonoma Avenue, Room 325, Santa Rosa, CA 95404, facsimile (707) 578– 3435; or (4) Stanford.HCP@noaa.gov. Include the document identifier: Stanford HCP. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Stern, San Francisco Bay Branch Supervisor, NMFS, telephone (707) 575–6060, Sheila Larsen, Senior Staff Biologist, USFWS; telephone (916) 414– 6685, or Mike Thomas, Chief, Conservation Planning Division, USFWS; telephone (916) 414–6600. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is provided pursuant to the ESA and regulations for implementing NEPA, as amended (40 CFR 1506.6), to inform the public that the FEIS and HCP, and the Services’ responses to public comments are available for review, and that the Services have filed a FEIS with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for public notice. The decision on whether to issue ITPs to Stanford will be made by the Services no sooner than 30 days after the publication of the EPA’s public notice. Copies of the FEIS, HCP and IA are available for public review during regular business hours from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the USFWS, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES), and the NMFS, North Central California Office (see ADDRESSES). Additionally, hard bound copies of the FEIS, HCP, and IA are available for viewing, or for partial or complete duplication, at the following locations: PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 70147 1. Social Sciences Resource Center, Green Library, Room 121, Stanford, CA 94305. 2. Palo Alto Main Library, 1213 Newell Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303. Individuals wishing to obtain copies of the FEIS, HCP, or IA should contact either of the Services by telephone (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or by letter (see ADDRESSES). These documents are also available electronically for review on the NMFS Southwest Region Web site at: https:// swr.nmfs.noaa.gov or the USFWS, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office Web site at https://www.fws.gov/ sacramento/. Background Section 9 of the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended, and Federal regulations prohibit the take of fish and wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened (16 U.S.C. 1538). The term ‘‘take’’ means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1532(19)). Harm includes significant habitat modification or degradation that actually kills or injures listed wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, and sheltering (50 CFR 17.3(c)). NMFS further defines harm as an act which actually kills or injures fish or wildlife, and expands the list of essential behavioral patterns that can be impaired by habitat modification or degradation to include breeding, spawning, rearing, migrating, feeding or sheltering (50 CFR 222.102). Pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA, the Services may issue ITPs authorizing the take of listed species if, among other things, such taking is incidental to, and not the purpose of, otherwise lawful activities. Regulations governing ITPs for threatened and endangered species are found in 50 CFR 17.22, 17.32, and 222.307. Each of the Services has received an application for an ITP for implementation of the HCP. The applications were prepared and submitted by The Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University. The Applicant has prepared the HCP to satisfy the application requirements for a section 10(a)(1)(B) permit under the ESA . The Applicant seeks a 50-year incidental take permit for Covered Activities within a proposed 8,180-acre permit area located in southern San Mateo and northern Santa Clara counties. The permit area includes approximately 8,000 acres of Stanford’s lands. Located on portions of the Santa E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 226 (Friday, November 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70145-70147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28489]



[[Page 70145]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

RIN 0648-XC275


Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/
Program Timberland Environmental Impact Report Associated With an 
Application for an Incidental Take Permit for Mendocino Redwood 
Company's Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation 
Plan, Mendocino County, CA

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce; Fish and Wildlife Service 
(USFWS), Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability and receipt of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the draft Mendocino 
Redwood Company Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community 
Conservation Plan (Proposed Plan), draft Implementing Agreement, and 
draft Environmental Impact Statement/Program Timberland Environmental 
Impact Report (EIS/PTEIR) for public review and comment. In response to 
receipt of an application from The Mendocino Redwood Company (MRC; 
Applicant), the National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service (Services) are considering the proposed action of 
issuing an 80-year incidental take permit for nine federally listed 
species and two currently unlisted species. The proposed permit would 
authorize take of individual members of species listed under section 10 
of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 
Stat. 884), as amended. The permit is needed because take of species 
could occur during timber harvest, forest management, and related 
activities within the 213,244-acre Proposed Plan Area in western 
Mendocino County, CA.

DATES: Two public meetings will be held: Tuesday, December 11, 2012, 
from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. (Ukiah, California), and Wednesday, December 12, 
2012, from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. (Fort Bragg, California). Written comments 
should be received on or before February 21, 2013.

ADDRESSES: The public meetings will be held at: Redwood Empire Fair 
Fine Arts Building, 1055 North State Street, Ukiah, CA 95482; and at 
C.V. Starr Center, 300 S. Lincoln St., Fort Bragg, CA 95437. Send 
comments by mail or facsimile to: (1) Eric Shott, National Marine 
Fisheries Service, 777 Sonoma Avenue, Room 325, Santa Rosa, CA 95404, 
facsimile (707) 578-3435; or (2) John Hunter, Fish and Wildlife 
Biologist, Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, 
1655 Heindon Road, Arcata, California 95521, facsimile (707) 822-8411. 
Send comments by email to mrc.hcpitp@noaa.gov. Copies of all email 
comments will be routed to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Shott, National Marine Fisheries 
Service (see ADDRESSES, above, or at 707-575-6089), or John Hunter, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see ADDRESSES, above, or at 707-822-
7201).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Availability of Documents

    Copies of the draft Proposed Plan, draft Implementing Agreement and 
draft EIS/PTEIR are available for public review during regular business 
hours from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the National Marine Fisheries Service 
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT); the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT); Mendocino County Library, Fort Bragg Branch Library, 499 
Laurel Street, Fort Bragg, CA 95437; and Mendocino County Library, Main 
Branch Library, 105 North Main Street, Ukiah, CA 95482. Individuals 
wishing to obtain copies of the draft Proposed Plan, draft Implementing 
Agreement, and draft EIS/PTEIR should contact either of the Services by 
telephone (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or by letter (see 
ADDRESSES). These documents also are available on the NMFS' Southwest 
Region Web site at https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/nepa.htm and the Arcata 
Fish and Wildlife Office Web site at https://www.fws.gov/arcata/.

Public Involvement

    The initial Notice of Intent to prepare an draft EIS/EIR for this 
project was published in the Federal Register on June 6, 2002 (67 FR 
38932), and public scoping meetings were held on June 25, June 26, and 
June 27, 2002.

Background Information

    Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 
16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and Federal regulations prohibit the take of 
fish and wildlife species listed as endangered or threatened by either 
of the Services (16 U.S.C. 1538). The ESA defines the term ``take'' as 
to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or 
collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1532). 
Harm includes significant habitat modification or degradation that 
actually kills or injures listed wildlife by significantly impairing 
essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, and 
sheltering [50 CFR 17.3(c)]. Pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the 
ESA, the Services may issue permits to authorize incidental take of 
listed fish or wildlife; i.e., take that is incidental to, and not the 
purpose of, otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing incidental 
take permits for threatened and endangered species are found in 50 CFR 
17.32 and 17.22, respectively.
    Although take of listed plant species is not prohibited under the 
ESA, and therefore cannot be authorized under an incidental take 
permit, plant species may be included on a permit in recognition of the 
conservation benefits provided to them under a Habitat Conservation 
Plan (HCP). All species included on an incidental take permit would 
receive assurances under the Services ``No Surprises'' regulation 50 
CFR 17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5).
    The application for an incidental take permit was prepared and 
submitted by Mendocino Redwood Company (Applicant). The Applicant has 
prepared an HCP to satisfy the application requirements for a section 
10(a)(1)(B) permit under the ESA, a section 2835 permit under the 
California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act of 2002 (NCCPA), 
and for compliance with California Code of Regulations 14 Sec. Sec.  
916.9(w)(3)-(4), 919.9(d), 919.11, and 1092.21(d) under the California 
Forest Practice Rules (FPRs). Thus, the Proposed Plan constitutes an 
HCP pursuant to the ESA, and a Natural Community Conservation Plan 
pursuant to the California NCCPA.
    The Applicant seeks an 80-year incidental take permit for covered 
activities within a proposed 213,244 acre Plan Area located entirely in 
Mendocino County, California. The Proposed Plan Area includes 
commercial timberlands owned by Mendocino Redwood Company that are 
located west of U.S. Route 101, and includes portions of the Albion, 
Big, Garcia, South Fork Eel, Navarro, Noyo, and upper Russian River 
river watersheds, as well as portions of Cottaneva, Howard, Hardy, 
Juan, Alder, Elk, Greenwood, and Mallo Pass creek watersheds.
    The Applicant has requested permits that will authorize take of 
nine animals listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA and two 
species that are

[[Page 70146]]

not currently listed under the Act. The following five listed species 
are proposed for coverage under the NMFS permit: Coho salmon (Southern 
Oregon/Northern California Coast Evolutionary Significant Unit [ESU]) 
(Oncorhynchus kisutch); coho salmon (Central California Coast ESU) (O. 
kisutch); Chinook salmon (California Coastal ESU) (O. tshawytscha); 
steelhead (Northern California Distinct Population Segment [DPS]) (O. 
mykiss); and steelhead (Central California Coast DPS) (O. mykiss). The 
following four listed species are proposed for coverage under the USFWS 
permit: California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii); northern spotted 
owl (Strix occidentalis caurina); marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus 
marmoratus); and Point Arena mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa nigra). 
The proposed USFWS permit would also cover two animal species that are 
not currently listed under the ESA: Northern red-legged frog (R. 
aurora); and coastal tailed frog (Ascaphus truei).
    If the Proposed Plan is approved and the permits are issued, take 
authorization of covered listed species would be effective at the time 
of permit issuance. Take of the currently nonlisted covered species 
would be authorized concurrent with the species' listing under the ESA, 
should they be listed during the permit period. The Proposed Plan is 
intended to be a comprehensive document, providing for species 
conservation and habitat planning, while allowing the Applicant to 
better manage ongoing forestry operations. The Proposed Plan also is 
intended to provide a coordinated process for permitting and mitigating 
the take of covered species as an alternative to the current project-
by-project approach.
    In order to comply with the requirements of the ESA, California 
Endangered Species Act, the California Natural Community Conservation 
Act (NCCPA), and the California Forest Practice Rules (FPRs), the 
Proposed Plan addresses a number of required elements, including: 
Species and habitat goals and objectives; evaluation of the effects of 
covered activities on covered species, including indirect and 
cumulative effects; a conservation strategy; a monitoring and adaptive 
management program; descriptions of changed circumstances and remedial 
measures; identification of funding sources; and an assessment of 
alternatives to take of listed species.
    Proposed covered activities within the Proposed Plan are all 
related to forestry operations and include timber felling, 
transportation, road and landing construction, maintenance, development 
and operation of rock pits and water drafting sites, site preparation, 
tree planting, thinning and other silvicultural activities, prescribed 
burning, habitat restoration and improvement, and monitoring and 
research in the Proposed Plan Area.
    The Proposed Plan's conservation strategy was designed to maintain 
or improve habitat conditions for listed and nonlisted covered species. 
The Proposed Plan includes minimization measures, such as disturbance 
buffers and sediment control measures that would avoid or minimize take 
of covered species from ongoing operations. The Proposed Plan also 
includes mitigation for take of covered species, including maintenance 
and enhancement of riparian areas, wetland areas, hardwood stands, and 
late successional coniferous forest stands. A 1,237-acre Lower Alder 
Creek Management area also would be established at the outset of the 
Proposed Plan. The only forest management that would be permitted 
within this management area would enhance habitat conditions for the 
marbled murrelet in order to offset any loss of any occupied marbled 
murrelet habitat that occurs elsewhere in the proposed Plan Area during 
the permit term. Habitat protected under the Proposed Plan would be 
monitored, and annual reports documenting the status of the species and 
compliance with the Proposed Plan would be submitted to the Services.

National Environmental Policy Act Compliance

    Proposed permit issuance triggers the need for compliance with the 
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California 
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Accordingly, a joint NEPA/CEQA 
document has been prepared. As co-lead Federal agencies, the Services 
have responsibility for compliance under NEPA and are providing notice 
of the availability of the draft EIS/PTEIR, which evaluates the impacts 
of proposed issuance of the permit and implementation of the Proposed 
Plan, as well as a reasonable range of alternatives.
    The draft EIS/PTEIR analyzes five alternatives, including the 
Proposed Plan, described above. The five alternatives being considered 
by the Services are the following:
    Proposed Plan Alternative: Under this alternative, the Proposed 
Plan as described above would be adopted. The Applicant would receive 
an 80-year incidental take permit for 11 species under Section 
10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA and Section 2835 of the NCCPA.
    No Action Alternative: Under this alternative, the Proposed Plan 
would not be adopted, and permits pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of 
the ESA and Section 2835 of the NCCPA would not be issued by the 
Services and California Department of Fish and Game, respectively. The 
Applicant would operate under existing California Forest Practice Rules 
and seek compliance with Federal and California ESAs on a case-by-case 
basis.
    Alternative A: Under this enhanced HCP alternative, the permit term 
and species covered would be the same as under the Proposed Plan, but 
there would be additional measures to enhance conservation of key 
aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Additional measures would include 
some larger protective streamside buffers and higher tree retention 
standards.
    Alternative B: Under this terrestrial reserves alternative, the 
permit term would be the same as under the Proposed Plan, but only two 
terrestrial species (northern spotted owl and marbled murrelet) would 
be covered, and the minimization and mitigation for the take of covered 
species would be largely achieved via a system of species-specific no-
harvest reserves. Unlike the other alternatives, non-reserve lands 
would be managed in a manner that emphasizes even-aged management of 
timber stands. Under this alternative, the California permit issued 
would not be under the NCCPA, but rather under Section 2080.1 or 2081 
of the California Fish and Game Code.
    Alternative C: Under this alternative, the Federal and California 
permits would be issued for only 40 years, during which time lands 
would be managed as under the Proposed Plan. After 40 years, land would 
be managed as under the No Action Alternative. Point Arena mountain 
beaver, northern red-legged frog, and coastal tailed frog would not be 
included as covered species on the take permits. Under this 
alternative, the California permit issued would not be under the NCCPA, 
but rather under Section 2080.1 or 2081 of the California Fish and Game 
Code.

Public Comments

    The Services invite the public to comment on the draft Proposed 
Plan, draft implementing agreement, and draft EIS/PTEIR during a 90-day 
public comment period beginning on the date of this notice. All 
comments received, including names and addresses, will become part of 
the administrative record and may be made available to the public.

[[Page 70147]]

    Comments submitted in an email will be accepted provided they do 
not exceed 6 megabytes in size and are virus free. Hypertext email 
links to other Web pages or publications shall not be deemed the 
equivalent of written comment.
    The Services will evaluate the applications, associated documents, 
and comments submitted to them to prepare a final EIS/PTEIR. A permit 
decision will be made no sooner than 30 days after the publication of 
the final EIS/PTEIR.
    This notice is provided pursuant to section 10(a) of the ESA and 
Service regulations for implementing NEPA, as amended (40 CFR 1506.6). 
We provide this notice in order to allow the public, agencies, or other 
organizations to review and comment on these documents.

    Dated: November 19, 2012.
Alexander Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, USFWS.
    Dated: November 19, 2012.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-28489 Filed 11-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P; 4310-55-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.