Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Okanogan County, WA; Bannon, Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk Grazing Allotments Environmental Impact Statement, 70137-70138 [2012-28420]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2012 / Notices
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Records are retained using the
appropriate, approved National
Archives Records Administration—
Schedules for the type of record being
maintained.
Forest Service
Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest,
Okanogan County, WA; Bannon,
Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk Grazing
Allotments Environmental Impact
Statement
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
David Ostermeyer, United States
Agency for International Development,
U.S. Department of State Annex 44, 455,
301 4th Street SW., Washington, DC
20547.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:
Individuals requesting notification of
the existence of records on them must
send the request in writing to the Chief
Privacy Officer, USAID, 2733 Crystal
Drive, 11th Floor, Arlington, Va. 22202.
The request must include the
requestor’s full name, his/her current
address and a return address for
transmitting the information. The
request shall be signed by either
notarized signature or by signature
under penalty of perjury and reasonably
specify the record contents being
sought.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Individuals wishing to request access
to a record must submit the request in
writing according to the ‘‘Notification
Procedures’’ above. An individual
wishing to request access to records in
person must provide identity
documents, such as government-issued
photo identification, sufficient to satisfy
the custodian of the records that the
requester is entitled to access.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
An individual requesting amendment
of a record maintained on himself or
herself must identify the information to
be changed and the corrective action
sought. Requests must follow the
‘‘Notification Procedures’’ above.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The records contained in this system
will be provided by and updated by the
individual who is the subject of the
record.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
Meredith Snee,
Privacy Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2012–28412 Filed 11–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Nov 21, 2012
Jkt 229001
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The USDA Forest Service will
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to disclose the
environmental effects of issuing Term
Grazing Permits to continue authorizing
cattle grazing on all or portions of four
existing grazing allotments: Bannon,
Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk; herein after
referred to as BART. The issuance of
Term Grazing Permits would continue
to authorize grazing at current permitted
cattle numbers and seasons of use.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis should be received by
January 7, 2013. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected to be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency and
made available for public review in
January 2013. The final environmental
impact statement is expected to be
available for review in February 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and suggestions concerning the scope of
the analysis to Christina Bauman,
Project Lead, Tonasket District, 1 West
Winesap, Tonasket, Washington 98855,
or phone 509–486–5112. Comments
may also be sent via emailed to
comments-pacificnorthwest-okanogantonasket@fs.fed.us with ‘‘BART Grazing
Allotment Management Plan’’ in the
subject line or via facsmile to 509–486–
1922. Electronic comments must be part
of an email message or as an attachment
in either MS Word format (.doc or
.docx), Rich Text Format (.rtf), Plain
Text (.txt), or Portable Document Format
(.pdf). Electronic comments containing
viruses will be rejected.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christina Bauman, Project Leader,
Tonasket District, Okanogan-Wenatchee
National Forest, 1 West Winesap,
Tonasket, Washington 98855 or call
509–486–5112.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
assessment area covers about 36,803
acres of National Forest System lands
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70137
within T. 35 N., R. 28 & 29 E., and T.
36 N., R. 28 & 29 E., Willamette
Meridian. Landmark locations include,
Bannon Mountain, Tunk Mountain,
Crawfish Lake, Aeneas, Barnell, Lost,
Cole, Bench and Jungle Creeks, and
Barnell Meadows.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of this assessment is to
authorize continued grazing in the
project area consistent with Forest Plan
standards and guidelines as amended
providing forage for permitted livestock
grazing is proposed because of the
following:
• Public Law 104–19 Section 504 of
the 1995 Rescissions Act, as amended,
requires each National Forest to
establish and adhere to a schedule for
completing NEPA analysis and updating
allotment management plans for all
rangeland allotments on National Forest
System lands.
• Where consistent with other
multiple use goals and objectives, there
is congressional intent to allow
livestock grazing on suitable lands
(Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act of
1960; Forest and Rangeland Renewable
Resources Planning Act of 1974; Federal
Land Policy and Management Act of
1976; and the National Forest
Management Act of 1976.
• It is Forest Service policy to make
forage available to qualified livestock
operators from lands suitable for grazing
consistent with land management plans
(CFR 222.2(c); and Forest Service
Manual [FSM] 2203.1).
• Recent surveys of the analysis area
identified some areas that are of concern
or are currently not meeting or moving
toward desired conditions in a manner
that is consistent with the Okanogan
Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan as amended. There is a need to
modify range infrastructure and
livestock management to move toward
desired conditions for soils, vegetation
and riparian resources. Livestock
grazing is one of the factors that
contribute to these altered resource
conditions.
Proposed Action
The proposed action authorizes
continued livestock grazing at current
levels using a combination of range
improvements and adaptive
management strategies to meet or move
toward meeting Forest Plan Standards
and to attain resource specific desired
conditions.
This alternative would implement
adaptive management strategies
analyzed in detail to provide
management options if changes to the
Proposed Action grazing strategy are
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
70138
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
needed. Monitoring would be designed
for early detection of resource
conditions that would trigger
management changes. Triggers would be
developed to identify when a specific
threshold is about to be reached and
cattle need to be moved. The length of
time each pasture is grazed and whether
additional fences would be installed
would be determined by monitoring
results. Adaptive management strategies
include installation of water
developments in the first stage and may
include construction of additional
fences in subsequent years if needed,
where the permittee and the Forest
Service agree that additional fencing
would improve livestock management
and riparian areas. A monitoring plan
would be implemented to determine
progress in attainment of Forest Plan
standards and guidelines.
Range improvement proposals
include:
• Removal of approximately 3 miles
of fence no longer needed for livestock
management and 2 non-functioning
water developments.
• Relocation of 4 troughs and one
corral outside of the Riparian Habitat
Conservation Area (RHCA) and 1 fence
approximately 1.5 miles long.
• Development of 16 springs
including exclosures around spring
source.
• Reconstruction of 3 existing spring
developments.
• Construction of 2 new corrals.
• Construction of 1 hardened crossing
on Aeneas Creek.
• Possible construction of
approximately 13 miles of new pasture
fence for rested areas.
More detailed information about the
proposed action and maps can be
accessed on the Okanogan-Wenatchee
National Forest internet site https://data.
ecosystem-management.org/nepaweb/
nepa_project_exp.php?project=38873.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the Proposed Action
and any alternative that is developed
following the scoping effort, the project
interdisciplinary team will analyze the
effects of:
• No Action alternative: No grazing
permits would be reauthorized; cattle
would be removed from all allotments
within two years. There would be no
change of allotment management in this
two year period. All structural
improvements currently in place would
be allowed to deteriorate over time or be
removed if funding is available.
• Accelerated improvement: This
alternative would reauthorize grazing at
current numbers with the
implementation of a four-year strategy
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Nov 21, 2012
Jkt 229001
that includes installation of water
developments in the first year, the
construction of fences in the second,
third year and fourth years. This
alternative would rest from livestock
grazing these newly created pastures
with the most sensitive riparian areas.
Range improvement proposals
include:
• Removal of approximately 3 miles
of fence no longer needed for livestock
management and 2 non-functioning
water developments.
• Relocation of 4 troughs and one
corral outside the RHCA and 1 fence
approximately 1.5 miles long.
• Development of 16 springs
including exclosures around spring
source.
• Reconstruction of 3 existing spring
developments.
• Construction of 2 new corrals.
• Construction of 1 hardened crossing
on Aeneas Creek.
• Construction of approximately 13
miles of new pasture fence for rested
areas.
Additional grazing alternatives may be
considered in response to scoping issues
and other resource values.
Responsible Official
The responsible official will be the
Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-Wenatchee
National Forest, 215 Melody Lane,
Wenatchee, Washington 98801.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
An environmental analysis will
evaluate site-specific issues, consider
management alternatives and analyze
the potential effects of the proposed
action and alternatives. An
environmental impact statement will
provide the Responsible Official with
the information needed to decide
whether to adopt and implement the
proposed action, or an alternative to the
proposed action, or take no action to
reauthorize grazing in the Bannon,
Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk grazing
Allotments.
This EIS will tier to the Okanogan
National Forest Land and Resource
Management Plan and its subsequent
amendments, which provide overall
guidance for land management activities
on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National
Forest.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues identified include
the effects of livestock grazing on
riparian resources such as stream bank
and channel instability, high stream
width/depth ratio, lack of diverse
riparian vegetation, high stream
sedimentation, and soil compaction,
displacement or erosion.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the Environmental
Impact Statement. Public comments
about this proposal are requested in
order to assist in identifying issues, and
determining how to best manage the
resources, and focus the analysis.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
become part of the public record for this
proposal and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, anonymous
comments will not provide the agency
with the ability to provide the
commenter with subsequent
environmental documents.
Rebecca Lockett Heath,
Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-Wenatchee
National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2012–28420 Filed 11–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–75–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Mandatory Shrimp Vessel and
Gear Characterization Survey.
OMB Control Number: 0648–0542.
Form Number(s): NA.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Number of Respondents: 1,563.
Average Hours per Response: 20
minutes.
Burden Hours: 521.
Needs and Uses: This request is for
extension of a current information
collection.
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 226 (Friday, November 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70137-70138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28420]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Okanogan County, WA; Bannon,
Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk Grazing Allotments Environmental Impact
Statement
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to disclose the environmental effects of issuing Term
Grazing Permits to continue authorizing cattle grazing on all or
portions of four existing grazing allotments: Bannon, Aeneas, Revis,
and Tunk; herein after referred to as BART. The issuance of Term
Grazing Permits would continue to authorize grazing at current
permitted cattle numbers and seasons of use.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received
by January 7, 2013. The draft environmental impact statement is
expected to be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency and made
available for public review in January 2013. The final environmental
impact statement is expected to be available for review in February
2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and suggestions concerning the scope
of the analysis to Christina Bauman, Project Lead, Tonasket District, 1
West Winesap, Tonasket, Washington 98855, or phone 509-486-5112.
Comments may also be sent via emailed to comments-pacificnorthwest-okanogan-tonasket@fs.fed.us with ``BART Grazing Allotment Management
Plan'' in the subject line or via facsmile to 509-486-1922. Electronic
comments must be part of an email message or as an attachment in either
MS Word format (.doc or .docx), Rich Text Format (.rtf), Plain Text
(.txt), or Portable Document Format (.pdf). Electronic comments
containing viruses will be rejected.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Bauman, Project Leader,
Tonasket District, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, 1 West Winesap,
Tonasket, Washington 98855 or call 509-486-5112.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The assessment area covers about 36,803
acres of National Forest System lands within T. 35 N., R. 28 & 29 E.,
and T. 36 N., R. 28 & 29 E., Willamette Meridian. Landmark locations
include, Bannon Mountain, Tunk Mountain, Crawfish Lake, Aeneas,
Barnell, Lost, Cole, Bench and Jungle Creeks, and Barnell Meadows.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of this assessment is to authorize continued grazing in
the project area consistent with Forest Plan standards and guidelines
as amended providing forage for permitted livestock grazing is proposed
because of the following:
Public Law 104-19 Section 504 of the 1995 Rescissions Act,
as amended, requires each National Forest to establish and adhere to a
schedule for completing NEPA analysis and updating allotment management
plans for all rangeland allotments on National Forest System lands.
Where consistent with other multiple use goals and
objectives, there is congressional intent to allow livestock grazing on
suitable lands (Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act of 1960; Forest and
Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974; Federal Land Policy
and Management Act of 1976; and the National Forest Management Act of
1976.
It is Forest Service policy to make forage available to
qualified livestock operators from lands suitable for grazing
consistent with land management plans (CFR 222.2(c); and Forest Service
Manual [FSM] 2203.1).
Recent surveys of the analysis area identified some areas
that are of concern or are currently not meeting or moving toward
desired conditions in a manner that is consistent with the Okanogan
Forest Land and Resource Management Plan as amended. There is a need to
modify range infrastructure and livestock management to move toward
desired conditions for soils, vegetation and riparian resources.
Livestock grazing is one of the factors that contribute to these
altered resource conditions.
Proposed Action
The proposed action authorizes continued livestock grazing at
current levels using a combination of range improvements and adaptive
management strategies to meet or move toward meeting Forest Plan
Standards and to attain resource specific desired conditions.
This alternative would implement adaptive management strategies
analyzed in detail to provide management options if changes to the
Proposed Action grazing strategy are
[[Page 70138]]
needed. Monitoring would be designed for early detection of resource
conditions that would trigger management changes. Triggers would be
developed to identify when a specific threshold is about to be reached
and cattle need to be moved. The length of time each pasture is grazed
and whether additional fences would be installed would be determined by
monitoring results. Adaptive management strategies include installation
of water developments in the first stage and may include construction
of additional fences in subsequent years if needed, where the permittee
and the Forest Service agree that additional fencing would improve
livestock management and riparian areas. A monitoring plan would be
implemented to determine progress in attainment of Forest Plan
standards and guidelines.
Range improvement proposals include:
Removal of approximately 3 miles of fence no longer needed
for livestock management and 2 non-functioning water developments.
Relocation of 4 troughs and one corral outside of the
Riparian Habitat Conservation Area (RHCA) and 1 fence approximately 1.5
miles long.
Development of 16 springs including exclosures around
spring source.
Reconstruction of 3 existing spring developments.
Construction of 2 new corrals.
Construction of 1 hardened crossing on Aeneas Creek.
Possible construction of approximately 13 miles of new
pasture fence for rested areas.
More detailed information about the proposed action and maps can be
accessed on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest internet site https://data.ecosystem-management.org/nepaweb/nepa_project_exp.php?project=38873.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the Proposed Action and any alternative that is
developed following the scoping effort, the project interdisciplinary
team will analyze the effects of:
No Action alternative: No grazing permits would be
reauthorized; cattle would be removed from all allotments within two
years. There would be no change of allotment management in this two
year period. All structural improvements currently in place would be
allowed to deteriorate over time or be removed if funding is available.
Accelerated improvement: This alternative would
reauthorize grazing at current numbers with the implementation of a
four-year strategy that includes installation of water developments in
the first year, the construction of fences in the second, third year
and fourth years. This alternative would rest from livestock grazing
these newly created pastures with the most sensitive riparian areas.
Range improvement proposals include:
Removal of approximately 3 miles of fence no longer needed
for livestock management and 2 non-functioning water developments.
Relocation of 4 troughs and one corral outside the RHCA
and 1 fence approximately 1.5 miles long.
Development of 16 springs including exclosures around
spring source.
Reconstruction of 3 existing spring developments.
Construction of 2 new corrals.
Construction of 1 hardened crossing on Aeneas Creek.
Construction of approximately 13 miles of new pasture
fence for rested areas.
Additional grazing alternatives may be considered in response to
scoping issues and other resource values.
Responsible Official
The responsible official will be the Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-
Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington
98801.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
An environmental analysis will evaluate site-specific issues,
consider management alternatives and analyze the potential effects of
the proposed action and alternatives. An environmental impact statement
will provide the Responsible Official with the information needed to
decide whether to adopt and implement the proposed action, or an
alternative to the proposed action, or take no action to reauthorize
grazing in the Bannon, Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk grazing Allotments.
This EIS will tier to the Okanogan National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan and its subsequent amendments, which provide
overall guidance for land management activities on the Okanogan-
Wenatchee National Forest.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues identified include the effects of livestock
grazing on riparian resources such as stream bank and channel
instability, high stream width/depth ratio, lack of diverse riparian
vegetation, high stream sedimentation, and soil compaction,
displacement or erosion.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the Environmental Impact Statement. Public comments
about this proposal are requested in order to assist in identifying
issues, and determining how to best manage the resources, and focus the
analysis.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will become part of the public
record for this proposal and will be available for public inspection.
Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered;
however, anonymous comments will not provide the agency with the
ability to provide the commenter with subsequent environmental
documents.
Rebecca Lockett Heath,
Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2012-28420 Filed 11-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-75-P