Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Okanogan County, WA; Bannon, Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk Grazing Allotments Environmental Impact Statement, 70137-70138 [2012-28420]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2012 / Notices RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Records are retained using the appropriate, approved National Archives Records Administration— Schedules for the type of record being maintained. Forest Service Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Okanogan County, WA; Bannon, Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk Grazing Allotments Environmental Impact Statement SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: David Ostermeyer, United States Agency for International Development, U.S. Department of State Annex 44, 455, 301 4th Street SW., Washington, DC 20547. NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: Individuals requesting notification of the existence of records on them must send the request in writing to the Chief Privacy Officer, USAID, 2733 Crystal Drive, 11th Floor, Arlington, Va. 22202. The request must include the requestor’s full name, his/her current address and a return address for transmitting the information. The request shall be signed by either notarized signature or by signature under penalty of perjury and reasonably specify the record contents being sought. RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: Individuals wishing to request access to a record must submit the request in writing according to the ‘‘Notification Procedures’’ above. An individual wishing to request access to records in person must provide identity documents, such as government-issued photo identification, sufficient to satisfy the custodian of the records that the requester is entitled to access. CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: An individual requesting amendment of a record maintained on himself or herself must identify the information to be changed and the corrective action sought. Requests must follow the ‘‘Notification Procedures’’ above. RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES The records contained in this system will be provided by and updated by the individual who is the subject of the record. EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: None. Meredith Snee, Privacy Analyst. [FR Doc. 2012–28412 Filed 11–21–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:03 Nov 21, 2012 Jkt 229001 Forest Service, USDA. Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement. AGENCY: ACTION: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to disclose the environmental effects of issuing Term Grazing Permits to continue authorizing cattle grazing on all or portions of four existing grazing allotments: Bannon, Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk; herein after referred to as BART. The issuance of Term Grazing Permits would continue to authorize grazing at current permitted cattle numbers and seasons of use. DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received by January 7, 2013. The draft environmental impact statement is expected to be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency and made available for public review in January 2013. The final environmental impact statement is expected to be available for review in February 2013. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and suggestions concerning the scope of the analysis to Christina Bauman, Project Lead, Tonasket District, 1 West Winesap, Tonasket, Washington 98855, or phone 509–486–5112. Comments may also be sent via emailed to comments-pacificnorthwest-okanogantonasket@fs.fed.us with ‘‘BART Grazing Allotment Management Plan’’ in the subject line or via facsmile to 509–486– 1922. Electronic comments must be part of an email message or as an attachment in either MS Word format (.doc or .docx), Rich Text Format (.rtf), Plain Text (.txt), or Portable Document Format (.pdf). Electronic comments containing viruses will be rejected. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Bauman, Project Leader, Tonasket District, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, 1 West Winesap, Tonasket, Washington 98855 or call 509–486–5112. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The assessment area covers about 36,803 acres of National Forest System lands SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 70137 within T. 35 N., R. 28 & 29 E., and T. 36 N., R. 28 & 29 E., Willamette Meridian. Landmark locations include, Bannon Mountain, Tunk Mountain, Crawfish Lake, Aeneas, Barnell, Lost, Cole, Bench and Jungle Creeks, and Barnell Meadows. Purpose and Need for Action The purpose of this assessment is to authorize continued grazing in the project area consistent with Forest Plan standards and guidelines as amended providing forage for permitted livestock grazing is proposed because of the following: • Public Law 104–19 Section 504 of the 1995 Rescissions Act, as amended, requires each National Forest to establish and adhere to a schedule for completing NEPA analysis and updating allotment management plans for all rangeland allotments on National Forest System lands. • Where consistent with other multiple use goals and objectives, there is congressional intent to allow livestock grazing on suitable lands (Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act of 1960; Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974; Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976; and the National Forest Management Act of 1976. • It is Forest Service policy to make forage available to qualified livestock operators from lands suitable for grazing consistent with land management plans (CFR 222.2(c); and Forest Service Manual [FSM] 2203.1). • Recent surveys of the analysis area identified some areas that are of concern or are currently not meeting or moving toward desired conditions in a manner that is consistent with the Okanogan Forest Land and Resource Management Plan as amended. There is a need to modify range infrastructure and livestock management to move toward desired conditions for soils, vegetation and riparian resources. Livestock grazing is one of the factors that contribute to these altered resource conditions. Proposed Action The proposed action authorizes continued livestock grazing at current levels using a combination of range improvements and adaptive management strategies to meet or move toward meeting Forest Plan Standards and to attain resource specific desired conditions. This alternative would implement adaptive management strategies analyzed in detail to provide management options if changes to the Proposed Action grazing strategy are E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1 70138 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 226 / Friday, November 23, 2012 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES needed. Monitoring would be designed for early detection of resource conditions that would trigger management changes. Triggers would be developed to identify when a specific threshold is about to be reached and cattle need to be moved. The length of time each pasture is grazed and whether additional fences would be installed would be determined by monitoring results. Adaptive management strategies include installation of water developments in the first stage and may include construction of additional fences in subsequent years if needed, where the permittee and the Forest Service agree that additional fencing would improve livestock management and riparian areas. A monitoring plan would be implemented to determine progress in attainment of Forest Plan standards and guidelines. Range improvement proposals include: • Removal of approximately 3 miles of fence no longer needed for livestock management and 2 non-functioning water developments. • Relocation of 4 troughs and one corral outside of the Riparian Habitat Conservation Area (RHCA) and 1 fence approximately 1.5 miles long. • Development of 16 springs including exclosures around spring source. • Reconstruction of 3 existing spring developments. • Construction of 2 new corrals. • Construction of 1 hardened crossing on Aeneas Creek. • Possible construction of approximately 13 miles of new pasture fence for rested areas. More detailed information about the proposed action and maps can be accessed on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest internet site https://data. ecosystem-management.org/nepaweb/ nepa_project_exp.php?project=38873. Possible Alternatives In addition to the Proposed Action and any alternative that is developed following the scoping effort, the project interdisciplinary team will analyze the effects of: • No Action alternative: No grazing permits would be reauthorized; cattle would be removed from all allotments within two years. There would be no change of allotment management in this two year period. All structural improvements currently in place would be allowed to deteriorate over time or be removed if funding is available. • Accelerated improvement: This alternative would reauthorize grazing at current numbers with the implementation of a four-year strategy VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:03 Nov 21, 2012 Jkt 229001 that includes installation of water developments in the first year, the construction of fences in the second, third year and fourth years. This alternative would rest from livestock grazing these newly created pastures with the most sensitive riparian areas. Range improvement proposals include: • Removal of approximately 3 miles of fence no longer needed for livestock management and 2 non-functioning water developments. • Relocation of 4 troughs and one corral outside the RHCA and 1 fence approximately 1.5 miles long. • Development of 16 springs including exclosures around spring source. • Reconstruction of 3 existing spring developments. • Construction of 2 new corrals. • Construction of 1 hardened crossing on Aeneas Creek. • Construction of approximately 13 miles of new pasture fence for rested areas. Additional grazing alternatives may be considered in response to scoping issues and other resource values. Responsible Official The responsible official will be the Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801. Nature of Decision To Be Made An environmental analysis will evaluate site-specific issues, consider management alternatives and analyze the potential effects of the proposed action and alternatives. An environmental impact statement will provide the Responsible Official with the information needed to decide whether to adopt and implement the proposed action, or an alternative to the proposed action, or take no action to reauthorize grazing in the Bannon, Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk grazing Allotments. This EIS will tier to the Okanogan National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan and its subsequent amendments, which provide overall guidance for land management activities on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest. Preliminary Issues Preliminary issues identified include the effects of livestock grazing on riparian resources such as stream bank and channel instability, high stream width/depth ratio, lack of diverse riparian vegetation, high stream sedimentation, and soil compaction, displacement or erosion. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Scoping Process This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides the development of the Environmental Impact Statement. Public comments about this proposal are requested in order to assist in identifying issues, and determining how to best manage the resources, and focus the analysis. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such manner that they are useful to the agency’s preparation of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and contentions. Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will become part of the public record for this proposal and will be available for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide the agency with the ability to provide the commenter with subsequent environmental documents. Rebecca Lockett Heath, Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest. [FR Doc. 2012–28420 Filed 11–21–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–75–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Title: Mandatory Shrimp Vessel and Gear Characterization Survey. OMB Control Number: 0648–0542. Form Number(s): NA. Type of Request: Regular submission (extension of a current information collection). Number of Respondents: 1,563. Average Hours per Response: 20 minutes. Burden Hours: 521. Needs and Uses: This request is for extension of a current information collection. The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 226 (Friday, November 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70137-70138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28420]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Okanogan County, WA; Bannon, 
Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk Grazing Allotments Environmental Impact 
Statement

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) to disclose the environmental effects of issuing Term 
Grazing Permits to continue authorizing cattle grazing on all or 
portions of four existing grazing allotments: Bannon, Aeneas, Revis, 
and Tunk; herein after referred to as BART. The issuance of Term 
Grazing Permits would continue to authorize grazing at current 
permitted cattle numbers and seasons of use.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received 
by January 7, 2013. The draft environmental impact statement is 
expected to be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency and made 
available for public review in January 2013. The final environmental 
impact statement is expected to be available for review in February 
2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and suggestions concerning the scope 
of the analysis to Christina Bauman, Project Lead, Tonasket District, 1 
West Winesap, Tonasket, Washington 98855, or phone 509-486-5112. 
Comments may also be sent via emailed to comments-pacificnorthwest-okanogan-tonasket@fs.fed.us with ``BART Grazing Allotment Management 
Plan'' in the subject line or via facsmile to 509-486-1922. Electronic 
comments must be part of an email message or as an attachment in either 
MS Word format (.doc or .docx), Rich Text Format (.rtf), Plain Text 
(.txt), or Portable Document Format (.pdf). Electronic comments 
containing viruses will be rejected.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Bauman, Project Leader, 
Tonasket District, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, 1 West Winesap, 
Tonasket, Washington 98855 or call 509-486-5112.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The assessment area covers about 36,803 
acres of National Forest System lands within T. 35 N., R. 28 & 29 E., 
and T. 36 N., R. 28 & 29 E., Willamette Meridian. Landmark locations 
include, Bannon Mountain, Tunk Mountain, Crawfish Lake, Aeneas, 
Barnell, Lost, Cole, Bench and Jungle Creeks, and Barnell Meadows.

Purpose and Need for Action

    The purpose of this assessment is to authorize continued grazing in 
the project area consistent with Forest Plan standards and guidelines 
as amended providing forage for permitted livestock grazing is proposed 
because of the following:
     Public Law 104-19 Section 504 of the 1995 Rescissions Act, 
as amended, requires each National Forest to establish and adhere to a 
schedule for completing NEPA analysis and updating allotment management 
plans for all rangeland allotments on National Forest System lands.
     Where consistent with other multiple use goals and 
objectives, there is congressional intent to allow livestock grazing on 
suitable lands (Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act of 1960; Forest and 
Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974; Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976; and the National Forest Management Act of 
1976.
     It is Forest Service policy to make forage available to 
qualified livestock operators from lands suitable for grazing 
consistent with land management plans (CFR 222.2(c); and Forest Service 
Manual [FSM] 2203.1).
     Recent surveys of the analysis area identified some areas 
that are of concern or are currently not meeting or moving toward 
desired conditions in a manner that is consistent with the Okanogan 
Forest Land and Resource Management Plan as amended. There is a need to 
modify range infrastructure and livestock management to move toward 
desired conditions for soils, vegetation and riparian resources. 
Livestock grazing is one of the factors that contribute to these 
altered resource conditions.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action authorizes continued livestock grazing at 
current levels using a combination of range improvements and adaptive 
management strategies to meet or move toward meeting Forest Plan 
Standards and to attain resource specific desired conditions.
    This alternative would implement adaptive management strategies 
analyzed in detail to provide management options if changes to the 
Proposed Action grazing strategy are

[[Page 70138]]

needed. Monitoring would be designed for early detection of resource 
conditions that would trigger management changes. Triggers would be 
developed to identify when a specific threshold is about to be reached 
and cattle need to be moved. The length of time each pasture is grazed 
and whether additional fences would be installed would be determined by 
monitoring results. Adaptive management strategies include installation 
of water developments in the first stage and may include construction 
of additional fences in subsequent years if needed, where the permittee 
and the Forest Service agree that additional fencing would improve 
livestock management and riparian areas. A monitoring plan would be 
implemented to determine progress in attainment of Forest Plan 
standards and guidelines.
    Range improvement proposals include:
     Removal of approximately 3 miles of fence no longer needed 
for livestock management and 2 non-functioning water developments.
     Relocation of 4 troughs and one corral outside of the 
Riparian Habitat Conservation Area (RHCA) and 1 fence approximately 1.5 
miles long.
     Development of 16 springs including exclosures around 
spring source.
     Reconstruction of 3 existing spring developments.
     Construction of 2 new corrals.
     Construction of 1 hardened crossing on Aeneas Creek.
     Possible construction of approximately 13 miles of new 
pasture fence for rested areas.
    More detailed information about the proposed action and maps can be 
accessed on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest internet site https://data.ecosystem-management.org/nepaweb/nepa_project_exp.php?project=38873.

Possible Alternatives

    In addition to the Proposed Action and any alternative that is 
developed following the scoping effort, the project interdisciplinary 
team will analyze the effects of:
     No Action alternative: No grazing permits would be 
reauthorized; cattle would be removed from all allotments within two 
years. There would be no change of allotment management in this two 
year period. All structural improvements currently in place would be 
allowed to deteriorate over time or be removed if funding is available.
     Accelerated improvement: This alternative would 
reauthorize grazing at current numbers with the implementation of a 
four-year strategy that includes installation of water developments in 
the first year, the construction of fences in the second, third year 
and fourth years. This alternative would rest from livestock grazing 
these newly created pastures with the most sensitive riparian areas.
    Range improvement proposals include:
     Removal of approximately 3 miles of fence no longer needed 
for livestock management and 2 non-functioning water developments.
     Relocation of 4 troughs and one corral outside the RHCA 
and 1 fence approximately 1.5 miles long.
     Development of 16 springs including exclosures around 
spring source.
     Reconstruction of 3 existing spring developments.
     Construction of 2 new corrals.
     Construction of 1 hardened crossing on Aeneas Creek.
     Construction of approximately 13 miles of new pasture 
fence for rested areas.

Additional grazing alternatives may be considered in response to 
scoping issues and other resource values.

Responsible Official

    The responsible official will be the Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-
Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 
98801.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    An environmental analysis will evaluate site-specific issues, 
consider management alternatives and analyze the potential effects of 
the proposed action and alternatives. An environmental impact statement 
will provide the Responsible Official with the information needed to 
decide whether to adopt and implement the proposed action, or an 
alternative to the proposed action, or take no action to reauthorize 
grazing in the Bannon, Aeneas, Revis, and Tunk grazing Allotments.
    This EIS will tier to the Okanogan National Forest Land and 
Resource Management Plan and its subsequent amendments, which provide 
overall guidance for land management activities on the Okanogan-
Wenatchee National Forest.

Preliminary Issues

    Preliminary issues identified include the effects of livestock 
grazing on riparian resources such as stream bank and channel 
instability, high stream width/depth ratio, lack of diverse riparian 
vegetation, high stream sedimentation, and soil compaction, 
displacement or erosion.

Scoping Process

    This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides 
the development of the Environmental Impact Statement. Public comments 
about this proposal are requested in order to assist in identifying 
issues, and determining how to best manage the resources, and focus the 
analysis.
    It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times 
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of 
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be 
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly 
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
    Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names 
and addresses of those who comment, will become part of the public 
record for this proposal and will be available for public inspection. 
Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; 
however, anonymous comments will not provide the agency with the 
ability to provide the commenter with subsequent environmental 
documents.

Rebecca Lockett Heath,
Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2012-28420 Filed 11-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-75-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.