Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or Superfund; Notice of Grant Funding Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs for FY2013, 69827-69837 [2012-28330]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
69827
TABLE I—20 PMNS RECEIVED FROM OCTOBER 1, 2012 TO OCTOBER 12, 2012—Continued
Case No.
Received
date
P–13–0015 ....
10/9/2012
P–13–0016 ....
Projected
notice end
date
Manufacturer/
importer
Use
Chemical
1/6/2013
CBI ........................
(S) Industrial inkjet ink manufacture ...
10/9/2012
1/6/2013
CBI ........................
(S) Thermoplastic polyurethane for
coatins/mouldings.
P–13–0017 ....
10/10/2012
1/7/2013
P–13–0018 ....
10/10/2012
1/7/2013
DIC International
(USA) LLC.
CBI ........................
(S) Polymer resin for spray paint/coatings.
(G) Stabilizing agent for polymers ......
(S)
Phenol,
4,4′-(1methylethylidene)bis-, polymer with
2-(chloromethyl)oxirane,
.alpha..omega.-hydroxypoly(oxy-1,4butanediyl),
1,1′-methylenebis[4isocyanatocyclohexane] and 2,2’(methylimino)bis[ethanol],
iso-bu
alochol.-blocked, phosphate (salts).
(S) 1,4-butanediol, polymer with 1,4diisocyanatobenzene and -hydro—
hydroxypoly(oxy-1,4-butanediyl).
(G) Acrylated silicone polymer.
P–13–0019 ....
10/11/2012
1/8/2013
Henkel Corporation
P–13–0020 ....
10/11/2012
1/8/2013
Zeon Chemicals
Incorporated.
(S) Crosslinker in moisture cure sealant formulaion.
(S) Polymer for injection molds; polymer modifier; film extrusion.
In Table II. of this unit, EPA provides
the following information (to the extent
that such information is not claimed as
CBI) on the NOCs received by EPA
during this period: The EPA case
number assigned to the NOC, the date
(G)
Trisodium
diethylene
triaminepolycarboxylate.
(G) Acetonoximino silane.
(G) Polycycloolefin polymer.
the NOC was received by EPA, the
projected end date for EPA’s review of
the NOC, and chemical identity.
TABLE II—12 NOCS RECEIVED FROM OCTOBER 1, 2012 TO OCTOBER 12, 2012
Received
date
Commencement notice
end date
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
10/2/2012
10/2/2012
10/9/2012
10/2/2012
10/10/2012
10/4/2012
10/4/2012
10/2/2012
10/5/2012
10/11/2012
10/8/2012
12/16/2011
9/7/2012
9/22/2012
6/19/2012
9/28/2012
9/28/2012
9/21/2012
9/20/2012
10/4/2012
9/28/2012
10/1/2012
P–12–0454 ............
10/9/2012
10/8/2012
Case No.
P–09–0111
P–11–0087
P–11–0433
P–12–0013
P–12–0094
P–12–0104
P–12–0156
P–12–0235
P–12–0392
P–12–0426
P–12–0442
If you are interested in information
that is not included in these tables, you
may contact EPA as described in Unit II.
to access additional non-CBI
information that may be available.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Imports, Notice
of commencement, Premanufacturer,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Test marketing
exemptions.
Dated: October 23, 2012.
Chandler Sirmon,
Director, Information Management Division,
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2012–28206 Filed 11–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
Chemical
(G) Alkoxysilane functional acrylic resin.
(G) Polyfluoroalkyl phosphoric acid salt, aqueous solution.
(G) Substituted amino polymer, with substituted amine salt and salted acrylate.
(G) Crosslinked polyalkyl methacrylate.
(G) Polyether polyurethane dispersion.
(G) Mixture of isomers of condensation products of substituted diazotized aminoanilines.
(G) Water soluble modified linseed oil.
(G) Polyesterurethane.
(G) Mix of isomers of substituted cyclohexyl carboxaldehyde.
(S) Aluminate(1-), tetrafluoro-, cesium, (t-4)-.
(G) Carboxylic acid, alkenyl ester, polymers with alkyl acrylate, me methacrylate and polyethylene glycol hydrogen sulfate substituted alkyl branched alkoxy methyl substituted
(alkoxy)alkyl ethers salts.
(G) Modified lignocellulose.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9753–9]
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund; Notice of
Grant Funding Guidance for State and
Tribal Response Programs for FY2013
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) will begin to accept
requests, from December 1, 2012
through January 31, 2013, for grants to
supplement State and Tribal Response
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Programs. This notice provides
guidance on eligibility for funding, use
of funding, grant mechanisms and
process for awarding funding, the
allocation system for distribution of
funding, and terms and reporting under
these grants. EPA has consulted with
state and tribal officials in developing
this guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements and a public record. Another
goal is to provide funding for other
activities that increase the number of
response actions conducted or overseen
by a state or tribal response program.
This funding is not intended to supplant
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
69828
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
current state or tribal funding for their
response programs. Instead, it is to
supplement their funding to increase
their response capacity.
For fiscal year 2013, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.1 million per state or
tribe. Subject to the availability of
funds, EPA regional personnel will be
available to provide technical assistance
to states and tribes as they apply for and
carry out these grants.
DATES: This action is effective as of
December 1, 2012. EPA expects to make
non-competitive grant awards to states
and tribes which apply during fiscal
year 2013.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for EPA
Regional Offices and EPA Headquarters
can be located at www.epa.gov/
brownfields and at the end of this
Notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Office of
Brownfields and Land Revitalization,
(202) 566–2892 or the applicable EPA
Regional Office listed at the end this
Notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant
program to establish and enhance state 1
and tribal 2 response programs. CERCLA
128(a) response program grants are
funded with categorical 3 State and
Tribal Assistance Grant (STAG)
appropriations. Section 128(a)
cooperative agreements are awarded and
administered by the EPA regional
offices. Generally, these response
programs address the assessment,
cleanup, and redevelopment of
brownfields sites and other sites with
actual or perceived contamination. This
document provides guidance that will
enable states and tribes to apply for and
use Fiscal Year 2013 section 128(a)
funds.4
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
1 The
term ‘‘state’’ is defined in this document as
defined in CERCLA section 101(27).
2 The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ is defined in this
document as it is defined in CERCLA section
101(36). Intertribal consortia, as defined in the
Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, Nov. 4,
2002, are also eligible for funding under CERCLA
section 128(a).
3 Categorical grants are issued by the U.S.
Congress to fund state and local governments for
narrowly defined purposes.
4 The Agency may waive any provision of this
guidance that is not required by statute, regulation,
Executive Order or overriding Agency policies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance entry for the section 128(a)
State and Tribal Response Program
cooperative agreements is 66.817. This
grant program is eligible to be included
in state and tribal Performance
Partnership Grants under 40 CFR part
35 subparts A and B, with the exception
of funds used to capitalize a revolving
loan fund for brownfield remediation
under section 104(k)(3); or purchase
insurance or develop a risk sharing
pool, an indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a State or Tribal
response program.
Requests for funding will be accepted
from December 1, 2012 through January
31, 2013. Requests EPA receives after
January 31, 2013 will not be considered
for FY2013 funding. Information that
must be submitted with the funding
request is listed in Section VIII of this
guidance. States or tribes that do not
submit the request in the appropriate
manner may forfeit their ability to
receive funds. First time requestors are
strongly encouraged to contact their
Regional EPA Brownfields contacts,
listed at the end of this guidance, prior
to submitting their funding request.
Requests submitted by the January 31,
2013 request deadline are preliminary;
final cooperative agreement work plans
and budgets will be negotiated with the
regional offices once final funding
allocation determinations are made. As
in previous years, EPA will place
special emphasis on reviewing a
cooperative agreement recipient’s use of
prior section 128(a) funding in making
allocation decisions and unexpended
balances are subject to 40 CFR 35.118
and 40 CFR35.518 to the extent
consistent with this guidance.
States and tribes requesting funds are
required to provide a Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number with their
cooperative agreement’s final package.
For more information, please go to
www.grants.gov.
II. Background
State and tribal response programs
oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at the majority of brownfields
sites across the country. The depth and
breadth of state and tribal response
programs vary. Some focus on CERCLA
related activities, while others are multifaceted, for example, addressing sites
regulated by both CERCLA and the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). Many state programs also
offer accompanying financial incentive
programs to spur cleanup and
redevelopment. In enacting CERCLA
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
section 128(a),5 Congress recognized the
accomplishments of state and tribal
response programs in cleaning up and
redeveloping brownfields sites. Section
128(a) also provides EPA with an
opportunity to strengthen its
partnership with states and tribes.
This funding is intended for those
states and tribes with overall
management and administrative
capacity within their government
required to administer a federal grant.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements of an environmental response
program and that the response program
establishes and maintains a public
record of sites addressed.
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional personnel will be available
to provide technical assistance to states
and tribes as they apply for and carry
out section 128(a) cooperative
agreements.
III. Eligibility for Funding
To be eligible for funding under
CERCLA section 128(a), a state or tribe
must:
1. Demonstrate that its response
program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four
elements of a response program,
described in Section V of this guidance;
or be a party to voluntary response
program Memorandum of Agreement
(VRP MOA) 6 with EPA;
AND
2. Maintain and make available to the
public a record of sites at which
response actions have been completed
in the previous year and are planned to
be addressed in the upcoming year, see
CERCLA section 128(b)(1)(C).
IV. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to
provide matching funds for cooperative
agreements awarded under section
128(a), with the exception of the section
128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to
capitalize a Brownfields Revolving Loan
Fund under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
V. The Four Elements—Section 128(a)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not
have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements.
5 Section 128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by
the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields
Revitalization Act (Brownfield Amendments).
6 States or tribes that are parties to VRP MOAs
and that maintain and make available a public
record are automatically eligible for section 128(a)
funding.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
Achievement of the four elements
should be viewed as a priority. Section
128(a) authorizes funding for activities
necessary to establish and enhance the
four elements, and to establish and
maintain the public record requirement.
The four elements of a response
program are described below:
1. Timely survey and inventory of
brownfields sites in state or tribal land.
EPA’s goal in funding activities under
this element is to enable the state or
tribe to establish or enhance a system or
process that will provide a reasonable
estimate of the number, likely locations,
and the general characteristics of
brownfields sites in their state or tribal
lands. EPA recognizes the varied scope
of state and tribal response programs
and will not require states and tribes to
develop a ‘‘list’’ of brownfields sites.
However, at a minimum, the state or
tribe should develop and/or maintain a
system or process that can provide a
reasonable estimate of the number,
likely location, and general
characteristics of brownfields sites
within their state or tribal lands.
Inventories should evolve to a
prioritization of sites based on
community needs, planning priorities,
and protection of human health and the
environment. Particular attention
should focus on those communities
with limited capacity to compete for,
and manage a competitive brownfield
assessment, revolving loan, and cleanup
grant.
Given funding limitations, EPA will
negotiate work plans with states and
tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and
effectively, and within a realistic time
frame. For example, many of EPA’s
Brownfields Assessment cooperative
agreement recipients conduct
inventories of brownfields sites in their
communities or jurisdictions. EPA
encourages states and tribes to work
with these cooperative agreement
recipients to obtain the information that
they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
2. Oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. EPA’s goal in funding
activities under this element is to have
state and tribal response programs that
include oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms, and
resources that are adequate to ensure
that:
a. A response action will protect
human health and the environment, and
be conducted in accordance with
applicable laws; and
b. The state or tribe will complete the
necessary response activities if the
person conducting the response
activities fails to complete the necessary
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
69829
response activities (this includes
operation and maintenance and/or longterm monitoring activities).
3. Mechanisms and resources to
provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation.7 EPA’s goal in
funding activities under this element is
to have states and tribes include in their
response program mechanisms and
resources for meaningful public
participation, at the local level,
including, at a minimum:
a. Public access to documents and
related materials that a state, tribe, or
party conducting the cleanup is relying
on or developing in making cleanup
decisions or conducting site activities;
b. Prior notice and opportunity for
meaningful public comment on cleanup
plans and site activities including the
input into the prioritization of sites; and
c. A mechanism by which a person
who is, or may be, affected by a release
or threatened release of a hazardous
substance, pollutant, or contaminant at
a brownfields site—located in the
community in which the person works
or resides—may request that a site
assessment be conducted. The
appropriate state or tribal official must
consider this request and appropriately
respond.
4. Mechanisms for approval of a
cleanup plan, and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete.
EPA’s goal in funding activities under
this element is to have states and tribes
include in their response program
mechanisms to approve cleanup plans
and to verify that response actions are
complete, including a requirement for
certification or similar documentation
from the state, the tribe, or a licensed
site professional that the response
action is complete. Written approval by
a state or tribal response program
official of a proposed cleanup plan is an
example of an approval mechanism.
a record of sites that includes the name
and location of sites at which response
actions have been completed during the
previous year;
2. Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a record of sites that includes the name
and location of sites at which response
actions are planned to be addressed in
the next year; and
3. Identify in the public record
whether or not the site, upon
completion of the response action, will
be suitable for unrestricted use. If not,
the public record must identify the
institutional controls relied on in the
remedy and include relevant
information concerning the entity that
will be responsible for oversight,
monitoring, and/or maintenance of the
institutional and engineering controls;
and how the responsible entity is
implementing those activities (see
Section VI.C).
Section 128(a) funds may be used to
maintain and make available a public
record system that meets the
requirements discussed above.
VI. Public Record Requirement
B. Making the Public Record Easily
Accessible
In order to be eligible for section
128(a) funding, states and tribes
(including those with MOAs) must
establish and maintain a public record
system, described below, in order to
receive funds. The public record should
be made available to the public in an
effort to provide a mechanism for
meaningful public participation (refer to
Section V. 3 above). Specifically, under
section 128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes
must:
1. Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
7 States and tribes establishing this element may
find useful information on public participation on
EPA’s community involvement Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/superfund/community/policies.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Distinguishing the ‘‘Survey and
Inventory’’ Element From the ‘‘Public
Record’’
It is important to note that the public
record requirement differs from the
‘‘timely survey and inventory’’ element
described in the ‘‘Four Elements’’
section above. The public record
addresses sites at which response
actions have been completed in the
previous year and are planned to be
addressed in the upcoming year. In
contrast, the ‘‘timely survey and
inventory’’ element, described above,
refers to identifying brownfields sites
regardless of planned or completed
actions there.
EPA’s goal is to enable states and
tribes to make the public record and
other information, such as information
from the ‘‘survey and inventory’’
element, easily accessible. For this
reason, EPA will allow states and tribes
to use section 128(a) funding to make
the public record, as well as other
information, such as information from
the ‘‘survey and inventory’’ element,
available to the public via the internet
or other means. For example, the
Agency would support funding state
and tribal efforts to include detailed
location information in the public
record such as the street address, and
latitude and longitude information for
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
69830
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
each site.8 States and tribes should
ensure that all affected communities
have appropriate access to the public
record including making it available online, in print at libraries, or other
community gathering places.
In an effort to reduce cooperative
agreement reporting requirements and
increase public access to the public
record, EPA encourages states and tribes
to place their public record on the
Internet. If a state or tribe places the
public record on the internet, maintains
the substantive requirements of the
public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for
purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record
reporting requirement met.
C. Long-Term Maintenance of the Public
Record
EPA encourages states and tribes to
maintain public record information,
including data on institutional controls,
on a long term basis (more than one
year) for sites at which a response action
has been completed. Subject to EPA
regional office approval, states or tribes
may include development and operation
of systems that ensure long term
maintenance of the public record,
including information on institutional
controls (such as ensuring the entity
responsible for oversight, monitoring,
and/or maintenance of the institutional
and engineering controls is
implementing those activities) in their
work plans.9
VII. Use of Funding
A. Overview
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the
eligible uses of cooperative agreement
funds by states and tribes. In general, a
state or tribe may use a cooperative
agreement to ‘‘establish or enhance’’
their response programs, including
elements of the response program that
include activities related to responses at
brownfields sites with petroleum
contamination. Eligible activities
include, but are not limited to, the
following:
• Developing legislation, regulations,
procedures, ordinances, guidance, etc.
that establish or enhance the
administrative and legal structure of
their response programs;
8 For further information on latitude and
longitude information, please see EPA’s data
standards Web site available at https://
iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/datastds/
findadatastandard/epaapproved/latitudelongitude.
9 States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on the EPA’s institutional
controls Web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/
policy/ic/index.htm
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
• Establishing and maintaining the
required public record described in
Section VI of this guidance;
• Operation, maintenance and longterm monitoring of institutional controls
and engineering controls;
• Conducting site-specific activities,
such as assessment or cleanup, provided
such activities establish and/or enhance
the response program and are tied to the
four elements. In addition to the
requirement under CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to provide for public
comment on cleanup plans and site
activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input
regarding the priority of sites to be
addressed and solicit input from local
communities, especially potential
environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk related
to exposure to hazardous waste or other
public health concerns, economically
disadvantaged or remote areas, and
communities with limited experience
working with government agencies. EPA
will not provide section 128(a) funds
solely for assessment or cleanup of
specific brownfields sites; site-specific
activities must be part of an overall
section 128(a) work plan that includes
funding for other activities that establish
or enhance the four elements;
• Capitalizing a revolving loan fund
(RLF) for brownfields cleanup under
CERCLA section 104(k)(3). These RLFs
are subject to the same statutory
requirements and cooperative agreement
terms and conditions applicable to RLFs
awarded under section 104(k)(3).
Requirements include a 20 percent
match (can be in the form of a
contribution of money, labor, material,
or services from a non-federal source)
on the amount of section 128(a) funds
used for the RLF, a prohibition on using
EPA cooperative agreement funds for
administrative costs relating to the RLF,
and a prohibition on using RLF loans or
subgrants for response costs at a site for
which the recipient may be potentially
liable under section 107 of CERCLA.
Other prohibitions contained in
CERCLA section 104(k)(4) also apply;
and
• Purchasing environmental
insurance or developing a risk-sharing
pool, indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or tribal
response program.
B. Uses Related to ‘‘Establishing’’ a
State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a),
‘‘establish’’ includes activities necessary
to build the foundation for the four
elements of a state or tribal response
program and the public record
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirement. For example, a state or
tribal response program may use section
128(a) funds to develop regulations,
ordinances, procedures, and/or
guidance. For more developed state or
tribal response programs, ‘‘establish’’
may also include activities that keep
their program at a level that meets the
four elements and maintains a public
record required as a condition of
funding under CERCLA section
128(b)(1)(C).
C. Uses Related to ‘‘Enhancing’’ a State
or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a),
‘‘enhance’’ is related to activities that
add to or improve a state or tribal
response program or increase the
number of sites at which response
actions are conducted under a state or
tribal response program.
The exact ‘‘enhancement’’ uses that
may be allowable depend upon the
work plan negotiated between the EPA
regional office and the state or tribe. For
example, regional offices and states or
tribes may agree that section 128(a)
funds may be used for outreach and
training directly related to increasing
awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It
may also include developing better
coordination and understanding of other
state response programs, e.g., RCRA or
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs). As
another example, states and tribal
response programs enhancement
activities can include outreach to local
communities to increase their awareness
and knowledge regarding the
importance of monitoring engineering
and institutional controls. Other
‘‘enhancement’’ uses may be allowable
as well.
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities
1. Uses for Site-Specific Activities
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for site-specific activities
that improve state or tribal capacity. The
amount grantees may request for sitespecific assessments and cleanups may
not exceed 50% of the total amount of
funding. A grantee may request a waiver
to exceed the 50% of annual funding for
site specific activities. In order for EPA
to consider the waiver, the total amount
of the request may not exceed the
grantee’s prior year’s funding level. The
funding request must include a brief
justification describing the reason(s) for
spending more than 50% of an annual
allocation on site-specific activities. An
applicant must include the following
information in the written justification:
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
• Total amount requested for eligible
brownfield site-specific activities;
• Percentage of the eligible
brownfield site-specific activities
(assuming waiver is approved) in the
total budget;
• Site specific activities that will be
covered by this funding. If known,
provide site specific information and
describe the development or
enhancement of your state/tribal site
specific program. Further explain how
the community will be (or has been)
involved in prioritization of site work
and especially those sites where there is
a potential or known significant
environmental impact to the
community;
• Please explain how this shift in
funding will not negatively impact the
core programmatic capacity (i.e., the
ability to establish/enhance four
elements of a response program) and
how related activities will be
maintained in spite of an increase in
site-specific work. Grantees must
demonstrate that they have adequate
funding from other sources to effectively
carry out work on the four elements for
EPA to grant a waiver of the 50% limit
on using 128(a) funds for site-specific
activities;
• Describe how this shift in funding
towards site-specific work is more
appropriate for your response program
rather than a request for an increase in
overall funding;
• Please explain whether the sites to
be addressed are those for which the
affected community(ies) has requested
work be conducted (refer to Section
VII.A Overview of Funding for more
information).
EPA Headquarters will base approval
of waivers on the information that is
included in the justification along with
the request for funding, as well as other
information available to the Agency.
EPA’s Regional Brownfield Coordinators
will inform grantees of the Agency’s
final decision(s).
2. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Assessment and Cleanup Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup
activities should establish and/or
enhance the response program and be
tied to the four elements. Site-specific
assessments and cleanups must comply
with all applicable laws and are subject
to the following restrictions:
a. Section 128(a) funds can only be
used for assessments or cleanups at sites
that meet the definition of a brownfields
site at CERCLA section 101(39). EPA
encourages states and tribes to use sitespecific funding to perform assessment
(e.g., phase II and phase III assessments)
and cleanup activities that will lead
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
more quickly to the reuse of sites
Furthermore, states and tribes that
perform site-specific activities should
plan to engage the targeted community
in the project. For example, Community
Relations Plans (CRP) could be
developed to address reasonable notice
to the public concerning the cleanup,
and provide opportunities for the public
to comment on the cleanup. States and
tribes should work towards securing
additional funding for site-specific
activities by leveraging resources from
other sources such as businesses, nonprofit organizations, education and
training providers, and/or federal, state,
tribal, and local governments;
b. Absent EPA approval, no more than
$200,000 per site assessment can be
funded with section 128(a) funds, and
no more than $200,000 per site cleanup
can be funded with section 128(a)
funds;
c. Absent EPA approval, the state/
tribe may not use funds awarded under
this agreement to assess and clean up
sites owned or operated by the
recipient; and
d. Assessments and cleanups cannot
be conducted at sites where the state/
tribe is a potentially responsible party
pursuant to CERCLA section 107,
except:
• At brownfields sites contaminated
by a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
• When the recipient would satisfy
all of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide
prospective purchaser except that the
date of acquisition of the property was
on or before January 11, 2002.
Subgrants cannot be provided to
entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to
CERCLA section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup
activities are proposed to be conducted,
except:
1. At brownfields sites contaminated
by a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
2. When the recipient would satisfy
all of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide
prospective purchaser except that the
date of acquisition of the property was
on or before January 11, 2002.
3. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities at Petroleum Brownfields
Sites
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for activities that establish
and enhance their response programs
including addressing petroleum
brownfield sites. Specifically, the costs
of site-specific activities, such as site
assessments or cleanup at petroleum
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69831
contaminated brownfields sites, defined
at CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are
eligible and are allowable if the activity
is included in the work plan negotiated
between the EPA regional office and the
state or tribe. Section 128(a) funds used
to capitalize a Brownfields RLF may be
used at brownfields sites contaminated
by petroleum to the extent allowed
under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
4. Other Eligible Uses of Funding
Other eligible uses of funds for sitespecific related include, but are not
limited to, the following activities:
• Technical assistance to federal
brownfields cooperative agreement
recipients;
• Development and/or review of
quality assurance project plans (QAPPs);
and
• Entering data into the ACRES
database.
E. Uses Related to Activities at ‘‘NonBrownfields’’ Sites
Costs incurred for activities at nonbrownfields sites, e.g., oversight, may be
eligible and allowable if such activities
are included in the state’s or tribe’s
work plan. These costs need not be
incurred in connection with a
brownfields site to be eligible, but must
be authorized under the state’s or tribe’s
work plan to be allowable. Other uses
may be eligible and allowable as well,
depending upon the work plan
negotiated between the EPA regional
office and the state or tribe. However,
assessment and cleanup activities may
only be conducted on eligible
brownfields sites, as defined in CERCLA
section 101(39).
VIII. General Programmatic Guidelines
for 128(a) Grant Funding Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA
section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement 10 between EPA
and a state or a tribe. The program is
administered under the general EPA
grant and cooperative agreement
regulations for states, tribes, and local
governments found in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 40 CFR Part 31 as
well as applicable provisions of 40 CFR
Part 35 Subparts A and B. Under these
regulations, the cooperative agreement
recipient for section 128(a) grant
program is the government to which a
cooperative agreement is awarded and
which is accountable for the use of the
funds provided. The cooperative
agreement recipient is the entire legal
10 A cooperative agreement is an agreement to a
state/tribe that includes substantial involvement by
EPA on activities described in the work plan which
may include technical assistance, collaboration on
program priorities, etc.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
69832
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
entity even if only a particular
component of the entity is designated in
the cooperative agreement award
document. Further, unexpended
balances of cooperative agreement funds
are subject to 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR
35.518 to the extent consistent with this
guidance. EPA allocates funds to state
and tribal response programs under 40
CFR 35.420 and 40 CFR 35.737.
A. One Application per State or Tribe
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional offices will negotiate and
enter into section 128(a) cooperative
agreements with eligible and interested
states or tribes. EPA will accept only one
application from each eligible state or
tribe.
B. Define the State or Tribal Response
Program
States and tribes must define in their
work plan the ‘‘section 128(a) response
program(s)’’ to which the funds will be
applied, and may designate a
component of the state or tribe that will
be EPA’s primary point of contact for
negotiations on their proposed work
plan. When EPA funds the section
128(a) cooperative agreement, states and
tribes may distribute these funds among
the appropriate state and tribal agencies
that are part of the section 128(a)
response program. This distribution
must be clearly outlined in their annual
work plan.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
C. Separate Cooperative Agreements for
the Capitalization of RLFs Using Section
128(a) Funds
If a portion of the section 128(a) grant
funds requested will be used to
capitalize a revolving loan fund for
cleanup, pursuant to section 104(k)(3),
two separate cooperative agreements
must be awarded, i.e., one for the RLF
and one for non-RLF uses. States and
tribes may, however, submit one initial
request for funding, delineating the RLF
as a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds
used to capitalize an RLF are not
eligible for inclusion into a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG).
D. Authority To Manage a Revolving
Loan Fund Program
If a state or tribe chooses to use its
section 128(a) funds to capitalize a
revolving loan fund program, the state
or tribe must have the authority to
manage the program, e.g., issue loans. If
the agency/department listed as the
point of contact for the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement does not have
this authority, it must be able to
demonstrate that another state or tribal
agency does have the authority to
manage the RLF and is willing to do so.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
E. Section 128(a) Cooperative
Agreements Can Be Part of a
Performance Partnership Grant (PPG)
States and tribes may include section
128(a) cooperative agreements in their
PPG 69 FR 51,756 (2004). Section 128(a)
funds used to capitalize an RLF or
purchase insurance or develop a risk
sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a
state or tribal response program are not
eligible for inclusion in the PPG.
F. Project Period
EPA regional offices will determine
the project period for each cooperative
agreement. These may be for multiple
years depending on the regional office’s
cooperative agreement policies. Each
cooperative agreement must have an
annual budget period tied to an annual
work plan. Pre-award costs are subject
to 40 CFR 35.113 and 40 CFR 35.513.
G. Demonstrating the Four Elements
As part of the annual work plan
negotiation process, states or tribes that
do not have VRP MOAs must
demonstrate that their program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements described in
Section V. EPA will not fund, in future
years, state or tribal response program
annual work plans if EPA determines
that these requirements are not met or
reasonable progress is not being made.
EPA may base this determination on the
information the state or tribe provides to
support its work plan, or on EPA’s
review of the state or tribal response
program.
H. Establishing and Maintaining the
Public Record
Prior to funding a state’s or tribe’s
annual work plan, EPA regional offices
will verify and document that a public
record, as described in Section VI and
below, exists and is being maintained.11
Specifically for:
• States or tribes that received initial
funding prior to FY12: Requests for
FY13 funds will not be accepted from
states or tribes that fail to demonstrate,
by the January 31, 2013 request
deadline, that they established and are
maintaining a public record. (Note, this
would potentially impact any state or
tribe that had a term and condition
placed on their FY12 cooperative
agreement that prohibited drawdown of
FY12 funds prior to meeting public
record requirement). States or tribes in
11 For purposes of cooperative agreement funding,
the state’s or tribe’s public record applies to that
state’s or tribe’s response program(s) that utilized
the section 128(a) funding.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
this situation will not be prevented from
drawing down their prior year funds
once the public record requirement is
met; and
• States or tribes that received initial
funding in FY12: By the time of the
actual FY13 award, the state or tribe
must demonstrate that they established
and maintained the public record (those
states and tribes that do not meet this
requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY13
cooperative agreement that prevents the
drawdown of FY13 funds until the
public record requirement is met).
I. Demonstration of Significant
Utilization of Prior Years’ Funding
States and tribes should be aware that
EPA and its Congressional
appropriations committees place
significant emphasis on the utilization
of prior years’ funding. Unused funds
from prior years will be considered in
the allocation process. Existing balances
of cooperative agreement funds as
reflected in EPA’s Financial Data
Warehouse could support an allocation
amount below a grantee’s request for
funding or, if appropriate deobligation
and reallocation by EPA Regions as
provided for in 40 CFR 35.118 and 40
CFR 35.518 . Grantees should include a
detailed explanation and justification of
funds that remain in EPA’s Financial
Data Warehouse from prior years (that
are related to response program
activities or brownfield related
activities).
EPA Regional staff will review EPA’s
Financial Database Warehouse to
identify the amount of remaining prior
year(s) funds. The cooperative
agreement recipient should work, as
early as possible, with both their own
finance department, and with their
Regional Project Officer to reconcile any
discrepancy between the amount of
unspent funds showing in EPA’s
system, and the amount reflected in the
recipient’s records. The recipient should
obtain concurrence from the Region on
the amount of unspent funds requiring
justification by the deadline for this
request for funding.
J. Optional: Explanation of Overall
Program Impacts of Possible Funding
Reductions
Please explain the programmatic
effects of a reduction (to your current
funding amount) on significant
activities of your response program.
Specifically, at what amount (e.g.,
percentage of your current funding
level) would your response program
experience core programmatic impacts
such as a reduction in staff, a decrease
in oversight activities, or other impacts
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
to the environment and health of the
communities the program serves, etc.?
An EPA Region may require that this
information be submitted as part of the
request for funding in order to fully
understand the individual program
impacts associated with decreased
funding. These impacts will be
considered as part of the decision for
the final allocation.
For Fiscal Year 2013, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.1 million per state or
tribe. Please note the CERCLA 128(a)
annual program’s budget has remained
static while demand for funding
continues to increase every year.12
Therefore, it is likely that the FY13 state
and tribal individual funding amounts
will be less than the FY12 individual
funding amounts.
After the January 31, 2013, request
deadline, EPA’s Regional Offices will
submit summaries of state and tribal
requests to EPA Headquarters. Before
submitting requests to EPA
Headquarters, regional offices may take
into account additional factors when
determining recommended allocation
amounts. Such factors include, but are
not limited to, the depth and breadth of
the state or tribal program; scope of the
perceived need for the funding, e.g., size
of state or tribal jurisdiction or the
proposed work plan balanced against
capacity of the program, amount of
current year funding, funds remaining
from prior years, etc.
After receipt of the regional
recommendations, EPA Headquarters
will consolidate requests and allocate
funds accordingly.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
2. Oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms;.
A. Demonstration of Significant
Utilization of Prior Years’ Funding
States and tribes requesting section
128(a) FY13 funds must submit the
following information, as applicable, to
their regional brownfield contact on or
before January 31, 2013. If a grantee
wishes to avoid an allocation reduction,
when submitting a request for FY13
funds, include a detailed explanation
and justification of funds that remain in
EPA’s financial Data Warehouse from
prior years (that are related to response
program activities or brownfield related
activities).
For those states and tribes that
received section 128(a) funds, you must
provide the amount of prior years’
funding including funds that recipients
have not received in payments (i.e.,
FY13
Requested
$XX,XXX
........................
........................
........................
........................
funds EPA has obligated for grants that
remain in EPA’s Financial Data
Warehouse). EPA will take into account
these funds in the allocation process
when determining the recipient’s
programmatic needs under 40 CFR
35.420 and 40 CFR 35.737.
B. Summary of Planned Use of FY12
Funding
All states and tribes requesting FY13
funds must submit a summary of the
planned use of the funds with
associated dollar amounts. Please
provide the request in the chart below.
The amount of funding requested
should be an amount that can be
reasonably spent in one year. It is likely
that the FY13 state and tribal individual
funding amounts will be less than the
FY12 individual funding amounts. The
requestor should work, as early as
possible, with their EPA Regional
Program contact to ensure that the
funding amount requested and related
activities are reasonable.
Summary of intended use
(example uses)
$XX,XXX
12 FY12 the EPA received $57.4 Million in
requests for funding from States and Tribes under
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
IX. Information To Be Submitted With
the Funding Request
FY12 Awarded
Establish or enhance the four elements:.
1. Timely survey and inventory
of brownfields sites;.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
EPA regional offices will work with
interested states and tribes to develop
their preliminary work plans and
funding requests. Final cooperative
agreement work plans and budgets will
be negotiated with the regional office
once final allocation determinations are
made. Please refer to process flow chart
below (dates are estimates and subject to
change):
Jkt 229001
1. Examples:
• Inventory and prioritize brownfields sites.
• Institutional control (IC)/engineering control (EC) tracking.
2. Examples:
• Develop/enhance ordinances, regulations, procedures for response
programs.
CERCLA 128(a). The FY12 enacted budget was
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
$49.3 Million. The resulting budget shortfall was
approximately $8.1 Million.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
EN21NO12.000
Funding use
K. Allocation System and Process for
Distribution of Funds
69833
69834
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
FY12 Awarded
FY13
Requested
Summary of intended use
(example uses)
3. Mechanisms and resources
to provide meaningful opportunities for public participation;.
........................
........................
4. Mechanisms or approval of a
cleanup plan and verification
and certification that cleanup
is complete.
Establish and maintain the public
record.
........................
........................
3. Examples:
• Develop a community involvement process.
• Fund an outreach coordinator.
• Issue public notices of site activities.
• Develop a process to seek public input from local communities, especially potential environmental justice communities, communities
with a health risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other
public health concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote
areas, and communities with limited experience working with government agencies to prioritize sites to be addressed.
4. Examples:
• Review cleanup plans and verify completed actions.
XX,XXX
XX,XXX
Enhance the response program ......
XX,XXX
XX,XXX
Funding use
Site-specific activities (amount requested should be incidental to
the workplan, see Section VI.D
for more information on what activities should be considered
when calculating site specific activities).
Environmental insurance .................
XX,XXX
XX,XXX
XX,XXX
XX,XXX
Revolving loan fund .........................
Total funding ......................
XX,XXX
XXX,XXX
XX,XXX
XXX,XXX
X. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and
tribal response programs will include
programmatic and administrative terms
and conditions. These terms and
conditions will describe EPA’s
substantial involvement including
technical assistance and collaboration
on program development and sitespecific activities. Each of the
subsections below summarizes the basic
terms and conditions, and related
reporting that will be required if a
cooperative agreement with EPA is
awarded.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
A. Progress Reports
In accordance with 40 CFR 31.40,
state and tribes must provide progress
reports as provided in the terms and
conditions of the cooperative agreement
negotiated with EPA regional offices.
State and tribal costs for complying with
reporting requirements are an eligible
expense under the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement. As a minimum,
state or tribal progress reports must
include both a narrative discussion and
performance data relating to the state’s
or tribe’s accomplishments and
environmental outputs associated with
the approved budget and workplan, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Maintain public record.
Create Web site for public record.
Disseminate public information on how to access the public record.
Provide oversight of site assessments and cleanups.
Attend training and conferences on brownfields cleanup technologies & other brownfields topics.
Update and enhance program management activities.
Negotiate/oversee contracts for response programs.
Enhance program management & tracking systems.
Perform site assessments and cleanups.
Develop QAPPs.
Prepare Property Profile Forms/input data into ACRES database
for these sites.
• Review potential uses of environmental insurance.
• Manage an insurance risk pool.
• Create a cleanup revolving loan fund.
Performance Partnership Grant? Yes b No b
should provide an accounting of section
128(a) funding. If applicable, the state or
tribe must include information on
activities related to establishing or
enhancing the four elements of the
state’s or tribe’s response program. All
recipients must provide information
relating to establishing or, if already
established, maintaining the public
record. Depending upon the activities
included in the state’s or tribe’s work
plan, an EPA regional office may request
that a progress report include:
1. Reporting interim and final
progress reports. Reports must
prominently display the following three
relevant Essential Elements as reflected
in the current EPA strategic plan:
Strategic Plan Goal 3: Cleaning Up
Communities and Advancing
Sustainable Development, Strategic Plan
Objective 3.1: Promote Sustainable and
Livable Communities, and Work plan
Commitments and Timeframes. EPA’s
strategic plan on the internet: https://
www.epa.gov/planandbudget/
strategicplan.html.
2. Reporting environmental insurance.
Recipients with work plans that include
funding for environmental insurance
must report:
• Number and description of
insurance policies purchased (e.g., type
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of coverage provided; dollar limits of
coverage; any buffers or deductibles;
category and identity of insured
persons; premium; first dollar or
umbrella; site specific or blanket;
occurrence or claims made, etc.);
• The number of sites covered by the
insurance;
• The amount of funds spent on
environmental insurance (e.g., amount
dedicated to insurance program, or to
insurance premiums); and
• The amount of claims paid by
insurers to policy holders.
3. Reporting for site-specific
assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include
funding for brownfields site assessment
or cleanup must input information
required by the OMB-approved Property
Profile Form into the Assessment
Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange
System (ACRES) database for each site
assessment and cleanup. In addition,
recipients must report how they provide
the affected community with prior
notice and opportunity for meaningful
participation as per CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) on proposed cleanup
plans and site activities. For example,
EPA strongly encourages states and
tribes to seek public input regarding the
priority of sites to be addressed and
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
solicit input from local communities,
especially potential environmental
justice communities, communities with
a health risk related to exposure to
hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged
or remote areas, and communities with
limited experience working with
government agencies.
4. Reporting for other site-specific
activities. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for other sitespecific related activities must include a
description of the site-specific activities
and the number of sites at which the
activity was conducted. For example:
• Number and frequency of oversight
audits of licensed site professional
certified cleanups;
• Number and frequency of state/
tribal oversight audits conducted;
• Number of sites where staff
conducted audits, provided technical
assistance, or conducted other oversight
activities; and
• Number of staff conducting
oversight audits, providing technical
assistance, or conducting other
oversight activities.
5. Reporting required when using
funding for an RLF. Recipients with
work plans that include funding for
revolving loan fund (RLF) must include
the information required by the terms
and conditions for progress reporting
under CERCLA section 104(k)(3) RLF
cooperative agreements.
6. Reporting for Non-MOA states and
tribes. All recipients without a VRP
MOA must report activities related to
establishing or enhancing the four
elements of the state’s or tribe’s
response program. For each element
state/tribes must report how they are
maintaining the element or how they are
taking reasonable steps to establish or
enhance the element as negotiated in
individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(B), reports on the oversight
and enforcement authorities/
mechanisms element may include:
• A narrative description and copies
of applicable documents developed or
under development to enable the
response program to conduct
enforcement and oversight at sites. For
example:
Æ Legal authorities and mechanisms
(e.g., statutes, regulations, orders,
agreements); and
Æ Policies and procedures to
implement legal authorities; and other
mechanisms;
• A description of the resources and
staff allocated/to be allocated to the
response program to conduct oversight
and enforcement at sites as a result of
the cooperative agreement;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
• A narrative description of how
these authorities or other mechanisms,
and resources, are adequate to ensure
that:
Æ A response action will protect
human health and the environment; and
be conducted in accordance with
applicable federal and state law; and if
the person conducting the response
action fails to complete the necessary
response activities, including operation
and maintenance or long-term
monitoring activities, the necessary
response activities are completed; and
• A narrative description and copy of
appropriate documents demonstrating
the exercise of oversight and
enforcement authorities by the response
program at a brownfields site.
The regional offices may also request
other information be added to the
progress reports, as appropriate, to
properly document activities described
by the cooperative agreement work plan.
EPA regions may allow states or tribes
to provide performance data in
appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward
progress reports to EPA Headquarters, if
requested. This information may be
used to develop national reports on the
outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a)
funding to states and tribes.
B. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by
January 31, 2013, a summary of the
previous federal fiscal year’s work
(October 1, 2011 through September 30,
2012). The following information must
be submitted to your regional project
officer:
• Environmental programs where
CERCLA 128(a) funds are used to
support capacity building (general
program support, non-site-specific
work). Indicate as appropriate from the
following:
—Brownfields
—Underground Storage Tanks/Leaking
Underground Storage Tanks
—Federal Facilities
—Solid Waste
—Superfund
—Hazardous Waste Facilities
—VCP (Voluntary Cleanup Program,
Independent Cleanup Program, etc.)
—Other __;
• Number of properties (or sites)
enrolled in a response program during
FY12;
• Number of properties (or sites)
where documentation indicates that
cleanup work is complete and all
required institutional controls (IC’s) are
in place, or not required;
• Total number of acres associated
with properties (or sites) in the previous
bullet; and
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69835
• Number of properties where
assistance was provided, but the
property was not enrolled in the
response program (OPTIONAL).
EPA may require states/tribes to
report specific performance measures
related to the four elements which can
be aggregated for national reporting to
Congress.
For example:
1. Timely survey and inventory—
estimated number of brownfields sites
in the state or on tribal land;
2. Oversight and enforcement
authorities/mechanisms—number of
active cleanups and percentage that
received oversight; percentage of active
cleanups not in compliance with the
cleanup workplan and that received
communications from recipient
regarding non-compliance;
3. Public participation—percentage of
sites in the response program where
public meetings/notices were conducted
regarding the cleanup plan and/or other
site activities; number of requests and
responses to site assessment requests;
and
4. Cleanup approval/certification
mechanisms—total number of ‘‘no
further action’’ letters or total number of
certificate of completions.
Note: This reporting requirement may
include activities not funded with CERCLA
Section 128(a) funding, because this
information may be used by EPA to evaluate
whether recipients have met or are taking
reasonable steps to meet the four elements of
a response program pursuant to CERCLA
Section 128(a)(2).
C. Reporting of Public Record
All recipients must report, as
specified in the terms and conditions of
their cooperative agreement,
information related to establishing, or if
already established, maintaining the
public record, described above. States
and tribes can refer to an already
existing public record, e.g., Web site or
other public database to meet the public
record requirement. Recipients
reporting may only be required to
demonstrate that the public record (a)
exists and is up-to-date, and (b) is
adequate. A public record may include
the following information:
A list of sites at which response
actions have been completed including:
• Date the response action was
completed;
• Site name;
• Name of owner at time of cleanup,
if known;
• Location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude);
• Whether an institutional control is
in place;
• Type of institutional control in
place (e.g., deed restriction, zoning
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
69836
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.);
• Nature of the contamination at the
site (e.g., hazardous substances,
contaminants or pollutants, petroleum
contamination, etc.); and
• Size of the site in acres.
A list of sites planned to be addressed
by the state or tribal response program
including:
• Site name and the name of owner
at time of cleanup, if known;
• Location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude);
• To the extent known, whether an
institutional control is in place;
• Type of the institutional control in
place (e.g., deed restriction, zoning
restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.);
• To the extent known, the nature of
the contamination at the site (e.g.,
hazardous substances, contaminants, or
pollutants, petroleum contamination,
etc.); and
• Size of the site in acres
D. Award Administration Information
1. Subaward and Executive
Compensation Reporting
Applicants must ensure that they
have the necessary processes and
systems in place to comply with the
subaward and executive total
compensation reporting requirements
established under OMB guidance at 2
CFR Part 170, unless they qualify for an
exception from the requirements,
should they be selected for funding.
2. Central Contractor Registration (CCR)/
System for Award Management (SAM)
and Data Universal Numbering System
(DUNS) Requirements
Unless exempt from these
requirements under OMB guidance at 2
CFR Part 25 (e.g., individuals),
applicants must:
• Register in the CCR/SAM prior to
submitting an application or proposal
under this announcement. CCR/SAM
information can be found at https://
www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/;
• Maintain an active CCR/SAM
registration with current information at
all times during which it has an active
Federal award or an application or
proposal under consideration by an
agency, and
• Provide its DUNS number in each
application or proposal it submits to the
agency. Applicants can receive a DUNS
number, at no cost, by visiting the D&B
Web site at: https://iupdate.dnb.com/
iUpdate/companylookup.htm.
Failure to comply with these
requirements will affect the applicant’s
ability to receive funding. Please note
that the CCR has been replaced by the
System for Award Management (SAM).
To learn more about SAM, go to
SAM.gov or https://www.sam.gov/
portal/public/SAM/.
3. Use of Funds
An applicant that receives an award
under this announcement is expected to
manage assistance agreement funds
efficiently and effectively, and make
sufficient progress towards completing
the project activities described in the
work-plan in a timely manner. The
assistance agreement will include
terms/conditions implementing this
requirement.
Region
State
Tribal
1—CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT
James Byrne, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100
(OSRR07–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912, Phone (617)
918–1389 Fax (617) 918–1291.
Alison Devine, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor, New York,
NY 10007–1866, Phone (212) 637–4158 Fax (212)
637–3083.
Janice Bartel, 1650 Arch Street (3HS51), Philadelphia,
PA 19103, Phone (215) 814–5394 Fax (215) 814–
3015.
Nicole Comick-Bates, 61 Forsyth Street, S.W, 10TH FL
(9T25), Atlanta, GA 30303–8909, Phone (404) 562–
9966 Fax (404) 562–8788.
Jan Pels, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (SE–7J), Chicago, IL 60604–3507, Phone (312) 886–3009 Fax
(312) 692–2161.
Amber Perry, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF),
Dallas, TX 75202–2733, Phone (214) 665–3172 Fax
(214) 665–6660.
Susan Klein, 11201 Renner Boulevard (SUPRSTAR),
Lenexa, KS 66219, Phone (913) 551–7786 Fax (913)
551–9786.
Christina Wilson, 1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR–B), Denver, CO 80202–1129, Phone (303) 312–6706 Fax
(303) 312–6065.
Eugenia Chow, 75 Hawthorne St. (SFD–6–1), San
Francisco, CA 94105, Phone (415) 972–3160 Fax
(415) 947–3520.
Mary K. Goolie, 222 West 7th Avenue #19 (AOO), Anchorage, AK 99513, Phone ((907) 271–3414 Fax
(907) 271–3424.
AmyJean McKeown, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100
(OSRR07–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912, Phone (617)
918–1248 Fax (617) 918–1291.
Alison Devine, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor, New York,
NY 10007–1866, Phone (212) 637–4158 Fax (212)
637–4158.
2—NJ, NY, PR, VI ...............
3—DE, DC, MD, PA, VA,
WV.
4—AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC,
SC, TN.
5—IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI ...
6—AR, LA, NM, OK, TX ......
7—IA, KS, MO, NE ..............
8—CO, MT, ND, SD, UT,
WY.
9—AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
10—AK, ID, OR, WA ...........
XI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
is therefore not subject to review under
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
Cindy J. Nolan, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 10TH FL
(9T25), Atlanta, GA 30303–8909, Phone (404) 562–
8425 Fax (404) 562–8788.
Jane Neumann, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (SE–7J),
Chicago, IL 60604–3507, Phone (312) 353–0123 Fax
(312) 697–2649.
Amber Perry, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF),
Dallas, TX 75202–2733, Phone (214) 665–3172 Fax
(214) 665–6660.
Susan Klein, 11201 Renner Boulevard (SUPRSTAR),
Lenexa, KS 66219, Phone (913) 551–7786 Fax (913)
551–9798.
Barbara Benoy, 1595 Wynkoop Street (8EPR–SA),
Denver, CO 80202–1129, Phone (303) 312–6760
Fax (303) 312–6962.
Glenn Kistner, 75 Hawthorne St. (SFD–6–1), San Francisco, CA 94105, Phone (415) 972–3004 Fax (415)
947–3520.
Mary K. Goolie, 222 West 7th Avenue #19 (AOO), Anchorage, AK 99513, Phone ((907) 271–3414 Fax
(907) 271–3424.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011). Because this
action is not subject to notice and
comment requirements under the
Administrative Procedures Act or any
other statute, it is not subject to the
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.) or Sections 202 and 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1999
(UMRA) (Pub.L. 104–4). In addition,
this action does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. This
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
action does not create new binding legal
requirements that substantially and
directly affect Tribes under Executive
Order 13175 (63 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This action does not have
significant Federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132 (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999). Because this
final rule has been exempted from
review under Executive Order 12866,
this final rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994). This action does not involve
technical standards; thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
et seq., generally provides that before
certain actions may take effect, the
agency promulgating the action must
submit a report, which includes a copy
of the action, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Because this final
action does not contain legally binding
requirements, it is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act.
Dated: November 15, 2012.
David R. Lloyd,
Director, Office of Brownfields and Land
Revitalization, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2012–28330 Filed 11–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0003; FRL–9368–6]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
SFIREG Full Committee; Notice of
Public Meeting
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Association of American
Pesticide Control Officials (AAPCO)/
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
State FIFRA Issues Research and
Evaluation Group (SFIREG) Full
Committee, will hold a 2-day meeting,
beginning on December 10, 2012, and
ending December 11, 2012. This notice
announces the location and times for
the meeting and sets forth the tentative
agenda topics.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Monday, December 10, 2012, from 8:30
a.m. to 5 p.m. and Tuesday, December
11, 2012, from 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon.
To request accommodation of a
disability, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATON
CONTACT, preferably at least 10 days
prior to the meeting, to give EPA as
much time as possible to process your
request.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
EPA, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 Crystal Dr., Arlington VA, 1st
Floor, South Conference Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
Kendall, Field External Affairs Division
(7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–5561; fax number: (703) 305–
5884; email address:
kendall.ron@epa.gov or Grier Stayton,
SFIREG Executive Secretary, P.O. Box
466, Milford, DE 19963; telephone
number: (302) 422–8152; fax number:
(302) 422–2435; email address: aapcosfireg@comcast.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are interested in
pesticide regulation issues affecting
States and any discussion between EPA
and SFIREG on the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
field implementation issues related to
human health, environmental exposure
to pesticides, and insight into EPA’s
decisionmaking process. You are invited
and encouraged to attend the meetings
and participate as appropriate.
Potentially affected entities may
include, but are not limited to:
Those persons who are or may be
required to conduct testing of chemical
substances under the Federal Food,
Drug and Cosmetics Act (FFDCA) or
FIFRA and those who sell, distribute, or
use pesticides, as well as any nongovernment organization.
If you have any questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
69837
B. How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
The docket for this action, identified
by docket identification (ID) number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0003, is available
at https://www.regulations.gov, or at the
Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Tentative Agenda Topics
1. Responses to SFIREG Pyrethroid
labeling issue letter.
2. Cooperative Agreement Guidance/
Grant Template Discussion.
3. EPA Region/State Lead Agency
Relationships/Roles.
4. Pollinator Protection Issues.
5. Issue Paper: Methomyl Fly Bait
Restricted Use Classification.
6. Issue Paper: Defining Aquatic
Habitat on Label.
7. Regional Issues/Responses to preSFIREG Questionnaire.
8. ‘‘State Regulator in Residence’’
Program.
9. Tribal Certification Policy
Implementation.
10. Regulating Effects of Pesticides
Outside Control of Applicator.
11. Performance Measures and How
They Will be Implemented.
III. How can I request to participate in
this meeting?
This meeting is open for the public to
attend. You may attend the meeting
without further notification. If
requesting special accommodations,
please see DATES.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests.
Dated: November 6, 2012.
Robert C. McNally,
Acting Director, Field External Affairs
Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012–28085 Filed 11–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69827-69837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28330]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9753-9]
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund; Notice of Grant Funding Guidance for State
and Tribal Response Programs for FY2013
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will begin to accept
requests, from December 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013, for grants to
supplement State and Tribal Response Programs. This notice provides
guidance on eligibility for funding, use of funding, grant mechanisms
and process for awarding funding, the allocation system for
distribution of funding, and terms and reporting under these grants.
EPA has consulted with state and tribal officials in developing this
guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to ensure that state and tribal
response programs include, or are taking reasonable steps to include,
certain elements and a public record. Another goal is to provide
funding for other activities that increase the number of response
actions conducted or overseen by a state or tribal response program.
This funding is not intended to supplant
[[Page 69828]]
current state or tribal funding for their response programs. Instead,
it is to supplement their funding to increase their response capacity.
For fiscal year 2013, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.1 million per state or tribe. Subject to the availability
of funds, EPA regional personnel will be available to provide technical
assistance to states and tribes as they apply for and carry out these
grants.
DATES: This action is effective as of December 1, 2012. EPA expects to
make non-competitive grant awards to states and tribes which apply
during fiscal year 2013.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for EPA Regional Offices and EPA
Headquarters can be located at www.epa.gov/brownfields and at the end
of this Notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: EPA's Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization,
(202) 566-2892 or the applicable EPA Regional Office listed at the end
this Notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant program to establish and enhance state
\1\ and tribal \2\ response programs. CERCLA 128(a) response program
grants are funded with categorical \3\ State and Tribal Assistance
Grant (STAG) appropriations. Section 128(a) cooperative agreements are
awarded and administered by the EPA regional offices. Generally, these
response programs address the assessment, cleanup, and redevelopment of
brownfields sites and other sites with actual or perceived
contamination. This document provides guidance that will enable states
and tribes to apply for and use Fiscal Year 2013 section 128(a)
funds.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The term ``state'' is defined in this document as defined in
CERCLA section 101(27).
\2\ The term ``Indian tribe'' is defined in this document as it
is defined in CERCLA section 101(36). Intertribal consortia, as
defined in the Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, Nov. 4, 2002,
are also eligible for funding under CERCLA section 128(a).
\3\ Categorical grants are issued by the U.S. Congress to fund
state and local governments for narrowly defined purposes.
\4\ The Agency may waive any provision of this guidance that is
not required by statute, regulation, Executive Order or overriding
Agency policies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance entry for the section
128(a) State and Tribal Response Program cooperative agreements is
66.817. This grant program is eligible to be included in state and
tribal Performance Partnership Grants under 40 CFR part 35 subparts A
and B, with the exception of funds used to capitalize a revolving loan
fund for brownfield remediation under section 104(k)(3); or purchase
insurance or develop a risk sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide financing for response actions under a
State or Tribal response program.
Requests for funding will be accepted from December 1, 2012 through
January 31, 2013. Requests EPA receives after January 31, 2013 will not
be considered for FY2013 funding. Information that must be submitted
with the funding request is listed in Section VIII of this guidance.
States or tribes that do not submit the request in the appropriate
manner may forfeit their ability to receive funds. First time
requestors are strongly encouraged to contact their Regional EPA
Brownfields contacts, listed at the end of this guidance, prior to
submitting their funding request.
Requests submitted by the January 31, 2013 request deadline are
preliminary; final cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be
negotiated with the regional offices once final funding allocation
determinations are made. As in previous years, EPA will place special
emphasis on reviewing a cooperative agreement recipient's use of prior
section 128(a) funding in making allocation decisions and unexpended
balances are subject to 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR35.518 to the extent
consistent with this guidance.
States and tribes requesting funds are required to provide a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number with their
cooperative agreement's final package. For more information, please go
to www.grants.gov.
II. Background
State and tribal response programs oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at the majority of brownfields sites across the country. The
depth and breadth of state and tribal response programs vary. Some
focus on CERCLA related activities, while others are multi-faceted, for
example, addressing sites regulated by both CERCLA and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Many state programs also offer
accompanying financial incentive programs to spur cleanup and
redevelopment. In enacting CERCLA section 128(a),\5\ Congress
recognized the accomplishments of state and tribal response programs in
cleaning up and redeveloping brownfields sites. Section 128(a) also
provides EPA with an opportunity to strengthen its partnership with
states and tribes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Section 128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by the Small
Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act
(Brownfield Amendments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This funding is intended for those states and tribes with overall
management and administrative capacity within their government required
to administer a federal grant. The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain elements of an environmental
response program and that the response program establishes and
maintains a public record of sites addressed.
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional personnel will
be available to provide technical assistance to states and tribes as
they apply for and carry out section 128(a) cooperative agreements.
III. Eligibility for Funding
To be eligible for funding under CERCLA section 128(a), a state or
tribe must:
1. Demonstrate that its response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements of a response program,
described in Section V of this guidance; or be a party to voluntary
response program Memorandum of Agreement (VRP MOA) \6\ with EPA;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ States or tribes that are parties to VRP MOAs and that
maintain and make available a public record are automatically
eligible for section 128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AND
2. Maintain and make available to the public a record of sites at
which response actions have been completed in the previous year and are
planned to be addressed in the upcoming year, see CERCLA section
128(b)(1)(C).
IV. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to provide matching funds for
cooperative agreements awarded under section 128(a), with the exception
of the section 128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to capitalize a
Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
V. The Four Elements--Section 128(a)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements.
[[Page 69829]]
Achievement of the four elements should be viewed as a priority.
Section 128(a) authorizes funding for activities necessary to establish
and enhance the four elements, and to establish and maintain the public
record requirement.
The four elements of a response program are described below:
1. Timely survey and inventory of brownfields sites in state or
tribal land. EPA's goal in funding activities under this element is to
enable the state or tribe to establish or enhance a system or process
that will provide a reasonable estimate of the number, likely
locations, and the general characteristics of brownfields sites in
their state or tribal lands. EPA recognizes the varied scope of state
and tribal response programs and will not require states and tribes to
develop a ``list'' of brownfields sites. However, at a minimum, the
state or tribe should develop and/or maintain a system or process that
can provide a reasonable estimate of the number, likely location, and
general characteristics of brownfields sites within their state or
tribal lands. Inventories should evolve to a prioritization of sites
based on community needs, planning priorities, and protection of human
health and the environment. Particular attention should focus on those
communities with limited capacity to compete for, and manage a
competitive brownfield assessment, revolving loan, and cleanup grant.
Given funding limitations, EPA will negotiate work plans with
states and tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and effectively, and
within a realistic time frame. For example, many of EPA's Brownfields
Assessment cooperative agreement recipients conduct inventories of
brownfields sites in their communities or jurisdictions. EPA encourages
states and tribes to work with these cooperative agreement recipients
to obtain the information that they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. EPA's goal in funding activities under this element is to
have state and tribal response programs that include oversight and
enforcement authorities or other mechanisms, and resources that are
adequate to ensure that:
a. A response action will protect human health and the environment,
and be conducted in accordance with applicable laws; and
b. The state or tribe will complete the necessary response
activities if the person conducting the response activities fails to
complete the necessary response activities (this includes operation and
maintenance and/or long-term monitoring activities).
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation.\7\ EPA's goal in funding activities under this
element is to have states and tribes include in their response program
mechanisms and resources for meaningful public participation, at the
local level, including, at a minimum:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ States and tribes establishing this element may find useful
information on public participation on EPA's community involvement
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/policies.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Public access to documents and related materials that a state,
tribe, or party conducting the cleanup is relying on or developing in
making cleanup decisions or conducting site activities;
b. Prior notice and opportunity for meaningful public comment on
cleanup plans and site activities including the input into the
prioritization of sites; and
c. A mechanism by which a person who is, or may be, affected by a
release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or
contaminant at a brownfields site--located in the community in which
the person works or resides--may request that a site assessment be
conducted. The appropriate state or tribal official must consider this
request and appropriately respond.
4. Mechanisms for approval of a cleanup plan, and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete. EPA's goal in funding
activities under this element is to have states and tribes include in
their response program mechanisms to approve cleanup plans and to
verify that response actions are complete, including a requirement for
certification or similar documentation from the state, the tribe, or a
licensed site professional that the response action is complete.
Written approval by a state or tribal response program official of a
proposed cleanup plan is an example of an approval mechanism.
VI. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for section 128(a) funding, states and
tribes (including those with MOAs) must establish and maintain a public
record system, described below, in order to receive funds. The public
record should be made available to the public in an effort to provide a
mechanism for meaningful public participation (refer to Section V. 3
above). Specifically, under section 128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes
must:
1. Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as
appropriate, a record of sites that includes the name and location of
sites at which response actions have been completed during the previous
year;
2. Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as
appropriate, a record of sites that includes the name and location of
sites at which response actions are planned to be addressed in the next
year; and
3. Identify in the public record whether or not the site, upon
completion of the response action, will be suitable for unrestricted
use. If not, the public record must identify the institutional controls
relied on in the remedy and include relevant information concerning the
entity that will be responsible for oversight, monitoring, and/or
maintenance of the institutional and engineering controls; and how the
responsible entity is implementing those activities (see Section VI.C).
Section 128(a) funds may be used to maintain and make available a
public record system that meets the requirements discussed above.
A. Distinguishing the ``Survey and Inventory'' Element From the
``Public Record''
It is important to note that the public record requirement differs
from the ``timely survey and inventory'' element described in the
``Four Elements'' section above. The public record addresses sites at
which response actions have been completed in the previous year and are
planned to be addressed in the upcoming year. In contrast, the ``timely
survey and inventory'' element, described above, refers to identifying
brownfields sites regardless of planned or completed actions there.
B. Making the Public Record Easily Accessible
EPA's goal is to enable states and tribes to make the public record
and other information, such as information from the ``survey and
inventory'' element, easily accessible. For this reason, EPA will allow
states and tribes to use section 128(a) funding to make the public
record, as well as other information, such as information from the
``survey and inventory'' element, available to the public via the
internet or other means. For example, the Agency would support funding
state and tribal efforts to include detailed location information in
the public record such as the street address, and latitude and
longitude information for
[[Page 69830]]
each site.\8\ States and tribes should ensure that all affected
communities have appropriate access to the public record including
making it available on-line, in print at libraries, or other community
gathering places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For further information on latitude and longitude
information, please see EPA's data standards Web site available at
https://iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/datastds/findadatastandard/epaapproved/latitudelongitude.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an effort to reduce cooperative agreement reporting requirements
and increase public access to the public record, EPA encourages states
and tribes to place their public record on the Internet. If a state or
tribe places the public record on the internet, maintains the
substantive requirements of the public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record reporting requirement met.
C. Long-Term Maintenance of the Public Record
EPA encourages states and tribes to maintain public record
information, including data on institutional controls, on a long term
basis (more than one year) for sites at which a response action has
been completed. Subject to EPA regional office approval, states or
tribes may include development and operation of systems that ensure
long term maintenance of the public record, including information on
institutional controls (such as ensuring the entity responsible for
oversight, monitoring, and/or maintenance of the institutional and
engineering controls is implementing those activities) in their work
plans.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on the EPA's institutional controls Web site
at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/ic/index.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. Use of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the eligible uses of cooperative
agreement funds by states and tribes. In general, a state or tribe may
use a cooperative agreement to ``establish or enhance'' their response
programs, including elements of the response program that include
activities related to responses at brownfields sites with petroleum
contamination. Eligible activities include, but are not limited to, the
following:
Developing legislation, regulations, procedures,
ordinances, guidance, etc. that establish or enhance the administrative
and legal structure of their response programs;
Establishing and maintaining the required public record
described in Section VI of this guidance;
Operation, maintenance and long-term monitoring of
institutional controls and engineering controls;
Conducting site-specific activities, such as assessment or
cleanup, provided such activities establish and/or enhance the response
program and are tied to the four elements. In addition to the
requirement under CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to provide for public
comment on cleanup plans and site activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input regarding the priority of sites
to be addressed and solicit input from local communities, especially
potential environmental justice communities, communities with a health
risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote areas, and communities
with limited experience working with government agencies. EPA will not
provide section 128(a) funds solely for assessment or cleanup of
specific brownfields sites; site-specific activities must be part of an
overall section 128(a) work plan that includes funding for other
activities that establish or enhance the four elements;
Capitalizing a revolving loan fund (RLF) for brownfields
cleanup under CERCLA section 104(k)(3). These RLFs are subject to the
same statutory requirements and cooperative agreement terms and
conditions applicable to RLFs awarded under section 104(k)(3).
Requirements include a 20 percent match (can be in the form of a
contribution of money, labor, material, or services from a non-federal
source) on the amount of section 128(a) funds used for the RLF, a
prohibition on using EPA cooperative agreement funds for administrative
costs relating to the RLF, and a prohibition on using RLF loans or
subgrants for response costs at a site for which the recipient may be
potentially liable under section 107 of CERCLA. Other prohibitions
contained in CERCLA section 104(k)(4) also apply; and
Purchasing environmental insurance or developing a risk-
sharing pool, indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a state or tribal response
program.
B. Uses Related to ``Establishing'' a State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a), ``establish'' includes activities
necessary to build the foundation for the four elements of a state or
tribal response program and the public record requirement. For example,
a state or tribal response program may use section 128(a) funds to
develop regulations, ordinances, procedures, and/or guidance. For more
developed state or tribal response programs, ``establish'' may also
include activities that keep their program at a level that meets the
four elements and maintains a public record required as a condition of
funding under CERCLA section 128(b)(1)(C).
C. Uses Related to ``Enhancing'' a State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a), ``enhance'' is related to activities
that add to or improve a state or tribal response program or increase
the number of sites at which response actions are conducted under a
state or tribal response program.
The exact ``enhancement'' uses that may be allowable depend upon
the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office and the state
or tribe. For example, regional offices and states or tribes may agree
that section 128(a) funds may be used for outreach and training
directly related to increasing awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It may also include developing
better coordination and understanding of other state response programs,
e.g., RCRA or Underground Storage Tanks (USTs). As another example,
states and tribal response programs enhancement activities can include
outreach to local communities to increase their awareness and knowledge
regarding the importance of monitoring engineering and institutional
controls. Other ``enhancement'' uses may be allowable as well.
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities
1. Uses for Site-Specific Activities
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for site-specific
activities that improve state or tribal capacity. The amount grantees
may request for site-specific assessments and cleanups may not exceed
50% of the total amount of funding. A grantee may request a waiver to
exceed the 50% of annual funding for site specific activities. In order
for EPA to consider the waiver, the total amount of the request may not
exceed the grantee's prior year's funding level. The funding request
must include a brief justification describing the reason(s) for
spending more than 50% of an annual allocation on site-specific
activities. An applicant must include the following information in the
written justification:
[[Page 69831]]
Total amount requested for eligible brownfield site-
specific activities;
Percentage of the eligible brownfield site-specific
activities (assuming waiver is approved) in the total budget;
Site specific activities that will be covered by this
funding. If known, provide site specific information and describe the
development or enhancement of your state/tribal site specific program.
Further explain how the community will be (or has been) involved in
prioritization of site work and especially those sites where there is a
potential or known significant environmental impact to the community;
Please explain how this shift in funding will not
negatively impact the core programmatic capacity (i.e., the ability to
establish/enhance four elements of a response program) and how related
activities will be maintained in spite of an increase in site-specific
work. Grantees must demonstrate that they have adequate funding from
other sources to effectively carry out work on the four elements for
EPA to grant a waiver of the 50% limit on using 128(a) funds for site-
specific activities;
Describe how this shift in funding towards site-specific
work is more appropriate for your response program rather than a
request for an increase in overall funding;
Please explain whether the sites to be addressed are those
for which the affected community(ies) has requested work be conducted
(refer to Section VII.A Overview of Funding for more information).
EPA Headquarters will base approval of waivers on the information
that is included in the justification along with the request for
funding, as well as other information available to the Agency. EPA's
Regional Brownfield Coordinators will inform grantees of the Agency's
final decision(s).
2. Uses Related to Site-Specific Assessment and Cleanup Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup activities should establish
and/or enhance the response program and be tied to the four elements.
Site-specific assessments and cleanups must comply with all applicable
laws and are subject to the following restrictions:
a. Section 128(a) funds can only be used for assessments or
cleanups at sites that meet the definition of a brownfields site at
CERCLA section 101(39). EPA encourages states and tribes to use site-
specific funding to perform assessment (e.g., phase II and phase III
assessments) and cleanup activities that will lead more quickly to the
reuse of sites Furthermore, states and tribes that perform site-
specific activities should plan to engage the targeted community in the
project. For example, Community Relations Plans (CRP) could be
developed to address reasonable notice to the public concerning the
cleanup, and provide opportunities for the public to comment on the
cleanup. States and tribes should work towards securing additional
funding for site-specific activities by leveraging resources from other
sources such as businesses, non-profit organizations, education and
training providers, and/or federal, state, tribal, and local
governments;
b. Absent EPA approval, no more than $200,000 per site assessment
can be funded with section 128(a) funds, and no more than $200,000 per
site cleanup can be funded with section 128(a) funds;
c. Absent EPA approval, the state/tribe may not use funds awarded
under this agreement to assess and clean up sites owned or operated by
the recipient; and
d. Assessments and cleanups cannot be conducted at sites where the
state/tribe is a potentially responsible party pursuant to CERCLA
section 107, except:
At brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled
substance as defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
When the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set
forth in CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective
purchaser except that the date of acquisition of the property was on or
before January 11, 2002.
Subgrants cannot be provided to entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to CERCLA section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup activities are proposed to be
conducted, except:
1. At brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled substance as
defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
2. When the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set forth
in CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective
purchaser except that the date of acquisition of the property was on or
before January 11, 2002.
3. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities at Petroleum Brownfields
Sites
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for activities that
establish and enhance their response programs including addressing
petroleum brownfield sites. Specifically, the costs of site-specific
activities, such as site assessments or cleanup at petroleum
contaminated brownfields sites, defined at CERCLA section
101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are eligible and are allowable if the activity is
included in the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office
and the state or tribe. Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize a
Brownfields RLF may be used at brownfields sites contaminated by
petroleum to the extent allowed under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
4. Other Eligible Uses of Funding
Other eligible uses of funds for site-specific related include, but
are not limited to, the following activities:
Technical assistance to federal brownfields cooperative
agreement recipients;
Development and/or review of quality assurance project
plans (QAPPs); and
Entering data into the ACRES database.
E. Uses Related to Activities at ``Non-Brownfields'' Sites
Costs incurred for activities at non-brownfields sites, e.g.,
oversight, may be eligible and allowable if such activities are
included in the state's or tribe's work plan. These costs need not be
incurred in connection with a brownfields site to be eligible, but must
be authorized under the state's or tribe's work plan to be allowable.
Other uses may be eligible and allowable as well, depending upon the
work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office and the state or
tribe. However, assessment and cleanup activities may only be conducted
on eligible brownfields sites, as defined in CERCLA section 101(39).
VIII. General Programmatic Guidelines for 128(a) Grant Funding Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement \10\ between EPA and a state or a tribe. The
program is administered under the general EPA grant and cooperative
agreement regulations for states, tribes, and local governments found
in the Code of Federal Regulations at 40 CFR Part 31 as well as
applicable provisions of 40 CFR Part 35 Subparts A and B. Under these
regulations, the cooperative agreement recipient for section 128(a)
grant program is the government to which a cooperative agreement is
awarded and which is accountable for the use of the funds provided. The
cooperative agreement recipient is the entire legal
[[Page 69832]]
entity even if only a particular component of the entity is designated
in the cooperative agreement award document. Further, unexpended
balances of cooperative agreement funds are subject to 40 CFR 35.118
and 40 CFR 35.518 to the extent consistent with this guidance. EPA
allocates funds to state and tribal response programs under 40 CFR
35.420 and 40 CFR 35.737.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ A cooperative agreement is an agreement to a state/tribe
that includes substantial involvement by EPA on activities described
in the work plan which may include technical assistance,
collaboration on program priorities, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. One Application per State or Tribe
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional offices will
negotiate and enter into section 128(a) cooperative agreements with
eligible and interested states or tribes. EPA will accept only one
application from each eligible state or tribe.
B. Define the State or Tribal Response Program
States and tribes must define in their work plan the ``section
128(a) response program(s)'' to which the funds will be applied, and
may designate a component of the state or tribe that will be EPA's
primary point of contact for negotiations on their proposed work plan.
When EPA funds the section 128(a) cooperative agreement, states and
tribes may distribute these funds among the appropriate state and
tribal agencies that are part of the section 128(a) response program.
This distribution must be clearly outlined in their annual work plan.
C. Separate Cooperative Agreements for the Capitalization of RLFs Using
Section 128(a) Funds
If a portion of the section 128(a) grant funds requested will be
used to capitalize a revolving loan fund for cleanup, pursuant to
section 104(k)(3), two separate cooperative agreements must be awarded,
i.e., one for the RLF and one for non-RLF uses. States and tribes may,
however, submit one initial request for funding, delineating the RLF as
a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize an RLF are not
eligible for inclusion into a Performance Partnership Grant (PPG).
D. Authority To Manage a Revolving Loan Fund Program
If a state or tribe chooses to use its section 128(a) funds to
capitalize a revolving loan fund program, the state or tribe must have
the authority to manage the program, e.g., issue loans. If the agency/
department listed as the point of contact for the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement does not have this authority, it must be able to
demonstrate that another state or tribal agency does have the authority
to manage the RLF and is willing to do so.
E. Section 128(a) Cooperative Agreements Can Be Part of a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG)
States and tribes may include section 128(a) cooperative agreements
in their PPG 69 FR 51,756 (2004). Section 128(a) funds used to
capitalize an RLF or purchase insurance or develop a risk sharing pool,
an indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or tribal response program are not
eligible for inclusion in the PPG.
F. Project Period
EPA regional offices will determine the project period for each
cooperative agreement. These may be for multiple years depending on the
regional office's cooperative agreement policies. Each cooperative
agreement must have an annual budget period tied to an annual work
plan. Pre-award costs are subject to 40 CFR 35.113 and 40 CFR 35.513.
G. Demonstrating the Four Elements
As part of the annual work plan negotiation process, states or
tribes that do not have VRP MOAs must demonstrate that their program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to include, the four elements
described in Section V. EPA will not fund, in future years, state or
tribal response program annual work plans if EPA determines that these
requirements are not met or reasonable progress is not being made. EPA
may base this determination on the information the state or tribe
provides to support its work plan, or on EPA's review of the state or
tribal response program.
H. Establishing and Maintaining the Public Record
Prior to funding a state's or tribe's annual work plan, EPA
regional offices will verify and document that a public record, as
described in Section VI and below, exists and is being maintained.\11\
Specifically for:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ For purposes of cooperative agreement funding, the state's
or tribe's public record applies to that state's or tribe's response
program(s) that utilized the section 128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
States or tribes that received initial funding prior to
FY12: Requests for FY13 funds will not be accepted from states or
tribes that fail to demonstrate, by the January 31, 2013 request
deadline, that they established and are maintaining a public record.
(Note, this would potentially impact any state or tribe that had a term
and condition placed on their FY12 cooperative agreement that
prohibited drawdown of FY12 funds prior to meeting public record
requirement). States or tribes in this situation will not be prevented
from drawing down their prior year funds once the public record
requirement is met; and
States or tribes that received initial funding in FY12: By
the time of the actual FY13 award, the state or tribe must demonstrate
that they established and maintained the public record (those states
and tribes that do not meet this requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY13 cooperative agreement that prevents the
drawdown of FY13 funds until the public record requirement is met).
I. Demonstration of Significant Utilization of Prior Years' Funding
States and tribes should be aware that EPA and its Congressional
appropriations committees place significant emphasis on the utilization
of prior years' funding. Unused funds from prior years will be
considered in the allocation process. Existing balances of cooperative
agreement funds as reflected in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse could
support an allocation amount below a grantee's request for funding or,
if appropriate deobligation and reallocation by EPA Regions as provided
for in 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518 . Grantees should include a
detailed explanation and justification of funds that remain in EPA's
Financial Data Warehouse from prior years (that are related to response
program activities or brownfield related activities).
EPA Regional staff will review EPA's Financial Database Warehouse
to identify the amount of remaining prior year(s) funds. The
cooperative agreement recipient should work, as early as possible, with
both their own finance department, and with their Regional Project
Officer to reconcile any discrepancy between the amount of unspent
funds showing in EPA's system, and the amount reflected in the
recipient's records. The recipient should obtain concurrence from the
Region on the amount of unspent funds requiring justification by the
deadline for this request for funding.
J. Optional: Explanation of Overall Program Impacts of Possible Funding
Reductions
Please explain the programmatic effects of a reduction (to your
current funding amount) on significant activities of your response
program. Specifically, at what amount (e.g., percentage of your current
funding level) would your response program experience core programmatic
impacts such as a reduction in staff, a decrease in oversight
activities, or other impacts
[[Page 69833]]
to the environment and health of the communities the program serves,
etc.? An EPA Region may require that this information be submitted as
part of the request for funding in order to fully understand the
individual program impacts associated with decreased funding. These
impacts will be considered as part of the decision for the final
allocation.
K. Allocation System and Process for Distribution of Funds
EPA regional offices will work with interested states and tribes to
develop their preliminary work plans and funding requests. Final
cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be negotiated with
the regional office once final allocation determinations are made.
Please refer to process flow chart below (dates are estimates and
subject to change):
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21NO12.000
For Fiscal Year 2013, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.1 million per state or tribe. Please note the CERCLA
128(a) annual program's budget has remained static while demand for
funding continues to increase every year.\12\ Therefore, it is likely
that the FY13 state and tribal individual funding amounts will be less
than the FY12 individual funding amounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ FY12 the EPA received $57.4 Million in requests for funding
from States and Tribes under CERCLA 128(a). The FY12 enacted budget
was $49.3 Million. The resulting budget shortfall was approximately
$8.1 Million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After the January 31, 2013, request deadline, EPA's Regional
Offices will submit summaries of state and tribal requests to EPA
Headquarters. Before submitting requests to EPA Headquarters, regional
offices may take into account additional factors when determining
recommended allocation amounts. Such factors include, but are not
limited to, the depth and breadth of the state or tribal program; scope
of the perceived need for the funding, e.g., size of state or tribal
jurisdiction or the proposed work plan balanced against capacity of the
program, amount of current year funding, funds remaining from prior
years, etc.
After receipt of the regional recommendations, EPA Headquarters
will consolidate requests and allocate funds accordingly.
IX. Information To Be Submitted With the Funding Request
A. Demonstration of Significant Utilization of Prior Years' Funding
States and tribes requesting section 128(a) FY13 funds must submit
the following information, as applicable, to their regional brownfield
contact on or before January 31, 2013. If a grantee wishes to avoid an
allocation reduction, when submitting a request for FY13 funds, include
a detailed explanation and justification of funds that remain in EPA's
financial Data Warehouse from prior years (that are related to response
program activities or brownfield related activities).
For those states and tribes that received section 128(a) funds, you
must provide the amount of prior years' funding including funds that
recipients have not received in payments (i.e., funds EPA has obligated
for grants that remain in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse). EPA will
take into account these funds in the allocation process when
determining the recipient's programmatic needs under 40 CFR 35.420 and
40 CFR 35.737.
B. Summary of Planned Use of FY12 Funding
All states and tribes requesting FY13 funds must submit a summary
of the planned use of the funds with associated dollar amounts. Please
provide the request in the chart below. The amount of funding requested
should be an amount that can be reasonably spent in one year. It is
likely that the FY13 state and tribal individual funding amounts will
be less than the FY12 individual funding amounts. The requestor should
work, as early as possible, with their EPA Regional Program contact to
ensure that the funding amount requested and related activities are
reasonable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY13 Summary of intended use (example
Funding use FY12 Awarded Requested uses)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Establish or enhance the four elements:.... $XX,XXX $XX,XXX
1. Timely survey and inventory of .............. .............. 1. Examples:
brownfields sites;. Inventory and prioritize
brownfields sites.
Institutional control (IC)/
engineering control (EC) tracking.
2. Oversight and enforcement .............. .............. 2. Examples:
authorities or other mechanisms;. Develop/enhance
ordinances, regulations,
procedures for response programs.
[[Page 69834]]
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide .............. .............. 3. Examples:
meaningful opportunities for public Develop a community
participation;. involvement process.
Fund an outreach
coordinator.
Issue public notices of
site activities.
Develop a process to seek
public input from local
communities, especially potential
environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk
related to exposure to hazardous
waste or other public health
concerns, economically
disadvantaged or remote areas, and
communities with limited
experience working with government
agencies to prioritize sites to be
addressed.
4. Mechanisms or approval of a cleanup .............. .............. 4. Examples:
plan and verification and Review cleanup plans and
certification that cleanup is complete. verify completed actions.
Establish and maintain the public record... XX,XXX XX,XXX Maintain public record.
Create Web site for public
record.
Disseminate public
information on how to access the
public record.
Enhance the response program............... XX,XXX XX,XXX Provide oversight of
site assessments and cleanups.
Attend training and
conferences on brownfields cleanup
technologies & other brownfields
topics.
Update and enhance program
management activities.
Negotiate/oversee
contracts for response programs.
Enhance program management
& tracking systems.
Site-specific activities (amount requested XX,XXX XX,XXX Perform site assessments
should be incidental to the workplan, see and cleanups.
Section VI.D for more information on what Develop QAPPs.
activities should be considered when Prepare Property Profile
calculating site specific activities). Forms/input data into ACRES
database for these sites.
Environmental insurance.................... XX,XXX XX,XXX Review potential uses of
environmental insurance.
Manage an insurance risk
pool.
Revolving loan fund........................ XX,XXX XX,XXX Create a cleanup
revolving loan fund.
Total funding...................... XXX,XXX XXX,XXX Performance Partnership Grant?
Yes [squ] No [squ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and tribal response programs will
include programmatic and administrative terms and conditions. These
terms and conditions will describe EPA's substantial involvement
including technical assistance and collaboration on program development
and site-specific activities. Each of the subsections below summarizes
the basic terms and conditions, and related reporting that will be
required if a cooperative agreement with EPA is awarded.
A. Progress Reports
In accordance with 40 CFR 31.40, state and tribes must provide
progress reports as provided in the terms and conditions of the
cooperative agreement negotiated with EPA regional offices. State and
tribal costs for complying with reporting requirements are an eligible
expense under the section 128(a) cooperative agreement. As a minimum,
state or tribal progress reports must include both a narrative
discussion and performance data relating to the state's or tribe's
accomplishments and environmental outputs associated with the approved
budget and workplan, and should provide an accounting of section 128(a)
funding. If applicable, the state or tribe must include information on
activities related to establishing or enhancing the four elements of
the state's or tribe's response program. All recipients must provide
information relating to establishing or, if already established,
maintaining the public record. Depending upon the activities included
in the state's or tribe's work plan, an EPA regional office may request
that a progress report include:
1. Reporting interim and final progress reports. Reports must
prominently display the following three relevant Essential Elements as
reflected in the current EPA strategic plan: Strategic Plan Goal 3:
Cleaning Up Communities and Advancing Sustainable Development,
Strategic Plan Objective 3.1: Promote Sustainable and Livable
Communities, and Work plan Commitments and Timeframes. EPA's strategic
plan on the internet: https://www.epa.gov/planandbudget/strategicplan.html.
2. Reporting environmental insurance. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for environmental insurance must report:
Number and description of insurance policies purchased
(e.g., type of coverage provided; dollar limits of coverage; any
buffers or deductibles; category and identity of insured persons;
premium; first dollar or umbrella; site specific or blanket; occurrence
or claims made, etc.);
The number of sites covered by the insurance;
The amount of funds spent on environmental insurance
(e.g., amount dedicated to insurance program, or to insurance
premiums); and
The amount of claims paid by insurers to policy holders.
3. Reporting for site-specific assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include funding for brownfields site
assessment or cleanup must input information required by the OMB-
approved Property Profile Form into the Assessment Cleanup and
Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) database for each site assessment
and cleanup. In addition, recipients must report how they provide the
affected community with prior notice and opportunity for meaningful
participation as per CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) on proposed
cleanup plans and site activities. For example, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input regarding the priority of sites
to be addressed and
[[Page 69835]]
solicit input from local communities, especially potential
environmental justice communities, communities with a health risk
related to exposure to hazardous waste or other public health concerns,
economically disadvantaged or remote areas, and communities with
limited experience working with government agencies.
4. Reporting for other site-specific activities. Recipients with
work plans that include funding for other site-specific related
activities must include a description of the site-specific activities
and the number of sites at which the activity was conducted. For
example:
Number and frequency of oversight audits of licensed site
professional certified cleanups;
Number and frequency of state/tribal oversight audits
conducted;
Number of sites where staff conducted audits, provided
technical assistance, or conducted other oversight activities; and
Number of staff conducting oversight audits, providing
technical assistance, or conducting other oversight activities.
5. Reporting required when using funding for an RLF. Recipients
with work plans that include funding for revolving loan fund (RLF) must
include the information required by the terms and conditions for
progress reporting under CERCLA section 104(k)(3) RLF cooperative
agreements.
6. Reporting for Non-MOA states and tribes. All recipients without
a VRP MOA must report activities related to establishing or enhancing
the four elements of the state's or tribe's response program. For each
element state/tribes must report how they are maintaining the element
or how they are taking reasonable steps to establish or enhance the
element as negotiated in individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(B), reports on the
oversight and enforcement authorities/mechanisms element may include:
A narrative description and copies of applicable documents
developed or under development to enable the response program to
conduct enforcement and oversight at sites. For example:
[cir] Legal authorities and mechanisms (e.g., statutes,
regulations, orders, agreements); and
[cir] Policies and procedures to implement legal authorities; and
other mechanisms;
A description of the resources and staff allocated/to be
allocated to the response program to conduct oversight and enforcement
at sites as a result of the cooperative agreement;
A narrative description of how these authorities or other
mechanisms, and resources, are adequate to ensure that:
[cir] A response action will protect human health and the
environment; and be conducted in accordance with applicable federal and
state law; and if the person conducting the response action fails to
complete the necessary response activities, including operation and
maintenance or long-term monitoring activities, the necessary response
activities are completed; and
A narrative description and copy of appropriate documents
demonstrating the exercise of oversight and enforcement authorities by
the response program at a brownfields site.
The regional offices may also request other information be added to
the progress reports, as appropriate, to properly document activities
described by the cooperative agreement work plan.
EPA regions may allow states or tribes to provide performance data
in appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward progress reports to EPA
Headquarters, if requested. This information may be used to develop
national reports on the outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a) funding to
states and tribes.
B. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by January 31, 2013, a summary of
the previous federal fiscal year's work (October 1, 2011 through
September 30, 2012). The following information must be submitted to
your regional project officer:
Environmental programs where CERCLA 128(a) funds are used
to support capacity building (general program support, non-site-
specific work). Indicate as appropriate from the following:
--Brownfields
--Underground Storage Tanks/Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
--Federal Facilities
--Solid Waste
--Superfund
--Hazardous Waste Facilities
--VCP (Voluntary Cleanup Program, Independent Cleanup Program, etc.)
--Other ----;
Number of properties (or sites) enrolled in a response
program during FY12;
Number of properties (or sites) where documentation
indicates that cleanup work is complete and all required institutional
controls (IC's) are in place, or not required;
Total number of acres associated with properties (or
sites) in the previous bullet; and
Number of properties where assistance was provided, but
the property was not enrolled in the response program (OPTIONAL).
EPA may require states/tribes to report specific performance
measures related to the four elements which can be aggregated for
national reporting to Congress.
For example:
1. Timely survey and inventory--estimated number of brownfields
sites in the state or on tribal land;
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities/mechanisms--number of
active cleanups and percentage that received oversight; percentage of
active cleanups not in compliance with the cleanup workplan and that
received communications from recipient regarding non-compliance;
3. Public participation--percentage of sites in the response
program where public meetings/notices were conducted regarding the
cleanup plan and/or other site activities; number of requests and
responses to site assessment requests; and
4. Cleanup approval/certification mechanisms--total number of ``no
further action'' letters or total number of certificate of completions.
Note: This reporting requirement may include activities not
funded with CERCLA Section 128(a) funding, because this information
may be used by EPA to evaluate whether recipients have met or are
taking reasonable steps to meet the four elements of a response
program pursuant to CERCLA Section 128(a)(2).
C. Reporting of Public Record
All recipients must report, as specified in the terms and
conditions of their cooperative agreement, information related to
establishing, or if already established, maintaining the public record,
described above. States and tribes can refer to an already existing
public record, e.g., Web site or other public database to meet the
public record requirement. Recipients reporting may only be required to
demonstrate that the public record (a) exists and is up-to-date, and
(b) is adequate. A public record may include the following information:
A list of sites at which response actions have been completed
including:
Date the response action was completed;
Site name;
Name of owner at time of cleanup, if known;
Location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude);
Whether an institutional control is in place;
Type of institutional control in place (e.g., deed
restriction, zoning
[[Page 69836]]
restriction, local ordinance, state registries of contaminated
property, deed notices, advisories, etc.);
Nature of the contamination at the site (e.g., hazardous
substances, contaminants or pollutants, petroleum contamination, etc.);
and
Size of the site in acres.
A list of sites planned to be addressed by the state or tribal
response program including:
Site name and the name of owner at time of cleanup, if
known;
Location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude);
To the extent known, whether an institutional control is
in place;
Type of the institutional control in place (e.g., deed
restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state registries of
contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.);
To the extent known, the nature of the contamination at
the site (e.g., hazardous substances, contaminants, or pollutants,
petroleum contamination, etc.); and
Size of the site in acres
D. Award Administration Information
1. Subaward and Executive Compensation Reporting
Applicants must ensure that they have the necessary processes and
systems in place to comply with the subaward and executive total
compensation reporting requirements established under OMB guidance at 2
CFR Part 170, unless they qualify for an exception from the
requirements, should they be selected for funding.
2. Central Contractor Registration (CCR)/System for Award Management
(SAM) and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Requirements
Unless exempt from these requirements under OMB guidance at 2 CFR
Part 25 (e.g., individuals), applicants must:
Register in the CCR/SAM prior to submitting an application
or proposal under this announcement. CCR/SAM information can be found
at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/;
Maintain an active CCR/SAM registration with current
information at all times during which it has an active Federal award or
an application or proposal under consideration by an agency, and
Provide its DUNS number in each application or proposal it
submits to the agency. Applicants can receive a DUNS number, at no
cost, by visiting the D&B Web site at: https://iupdate.dnb.com/iUpdate/companylookup.htm.
Failure to comply with these requirements will affect the
applicant's ability to receive funding. Please note that the CCR has
been replaced by the System for Award Management (SAM). To learn more
about SAM, go to SAM.gov or https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/.
3. Use of Funds
An applicant that receives an award under this announcement is
expected to manage assistance agreement funds efficiently and
effectively, and make sufficient progress towards completing the
project activities described in the work-plan in a timely manner. The
assistance agreement will include terms/conditions implementing this
requirement.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Region State Tribal
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1--CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT... James Byrne, 5 Post AmyJean McKeown, 5
Office Square, Post Office Square,
Suite 100 (OSRR07- Suite 100 (OSRR07-
2), Boston, MA 2), Boston, MA
02109-3912, Phone 02109-3912, Phone
(617) 918-1389 Fax (617) 918-1248 Fax
(617) 918-1291. (617) 918-1291.
2--NJ, NY, PR, VI........... Alison Devine, 290 Alison Devine, 290
Broadway, 18th Broadway, 18th
Floor, New York, NY Floor, New York, NY
10007-1866, Phone 10007-1866, Phone
(212) 637-4158 Fax (212) 637-4158 Fax
(212) 637-3083. (212) 637-4158.
3--DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV... Janice Bartel, 1650 ....................
Arch Street
(3HS51),
Philadelphia, PA
19103, Phone (215)
814-5394 Fax (215)
814-3015.
4--AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, Nicole Comick-Bates, Cindy J. Nolan, 61
SC, TN. 61 Forsyth Street, Forsyth Street SW.,
S.W, 10TH FL 10TH FL (9T25),
(9T25), Atlanta, GA Atlanta, GA 30303-
30303-8909, Phone 8909, Phone (404)
(404) 562-9966 Fax 562-8425 Fax (404)
(404) 562-8788. 562-8788.
5--IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI... Jan Pels, 77 West Jane Neumann, 77
Jackson Boulevard West Jackson
(SE-7J), Chicago, Boulevard (SE-7J),
IL 60604-3507, Chicago, IL 60604-
Phone (312) 886- 3507, Phone (312)
3009 Fax (312) 692- 353-0123 Fax (312)
2161. 697-2649.
6--AR, LA, NM, OK, TX....... Amber Perry, 1445 Amber Perry, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite Ross Avenue, Suite
1200 (6SF), Dallas, 1200 (6SF), Dallas,
TX 75202-2733, TX 75202-2733,
Phone (214) 665- Phone (214) 665-
3172 Fax (214) 665- 3172 Fax (214) 665-
6660. 6660.
7--IA, KS, MO, NE........... Susan Klein, 11201 Susan Klein, 11201
Renner Boulevard Renner Boulevard
(SUPRSTAR), Lenexa, (SUPRSTAR), Lenexa,
KS 66219, Phone KS 66219, Phone
(913) 551-7786 Fax (913) 551-7786 Fax
(913) 551-9786. (913) 551-9798.
8--CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY... Christina Wilson, Barbara Benoy, 1595
1595 Wynkoop Street Wynkoop Street
(EPR-B), Denver, CO (8EPR-SA), Denver,
80202-1129, Phone CO 80202-1129,
(303) 312-6706 Fax Phone (303) 312-
(303) 312-6065. 6760 Fax (303) 312-
6962.
9--AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU... Eugenia Chow, 75 Glenn Kistner, 75
Hawthorne St. (SFD- Hawthorne St. (SFD-
6-1), San 6-1), San
Francisco, CA Francisco, CA
94105, Phone (415) 94105, Phone (415)
972-3160 Fax (415) 972-3004 Fax (415)
947-3520. 947-3520.
10--AK, ID, OR, WA.......... Mary K. Goolie, 222 Mary K. Goolie, 222
West 7th Avenue West 7th Avenue
19 (AOO), 19 (AOO),
Anchorage, AK Anchorage, AK
99513, Phone ((907) 99513, Phone ((907)
271-3414 Fax (907) 271-3414 Fax (907)
271-3424. 271-3424.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
XI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not
subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011). Because this action is not subject to notice and
comment requirements under the Administrative Procedures Act or any
other statute, it is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) or Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1999 (UMRA) (Pub.L. 104-4). In addition, this action does
not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This
[[Page 69837]]
action does not create new binding legal requirements that
substantially and directly affect Tribes under Executive Order 13175
(63 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action does not have significant
Federalism implications under Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). Because this final rule has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this final rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). This action does not
involve technical standards; thus, the requirements of Section 12(d) of
the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq., generally provides that before certain actions may take effect,
the agency promulgating the action must submit a report, which includes
a copy of the action, to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. Because this final action
does not contain legally binding requirements, it is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act.
Dated: November 15, 2012.
David R. Lloyd,
Director, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2012-28330 Filed 11-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P