Solid Waste Rail Transfer Facilities, 69769-69780 [2012-28196]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Surface Transportation Board
49 CFR Part 33
49 CFR Part 1155
[Docket No. EP 684]
[Docket No. OST 2010–0298]
Solid Waste Rail Transfer Facilities
RIN 2105–AD83
AGENCY:
Prioritization and Allocation Authority
Exercised by the Secretary of
Transportation Under the Defense
Production Act
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation (OST), DOT.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Confirmation of effective date.
On October 1, 2012, the
Department published a final rule
requesting comment at 77 FR 59793 to
clarify the priorities and allocation
authorities exercised by the Secretary of
Transportation (Secretary) under title I
of the Defense Production Act of 1950
and to establish the administrative
procedures by which the Secretary will
exercise this authority. In the final rule,
the Department requested comment on
certain revised definitions found in 49
CFR 33.20. No comments were received
by the comment closing date of October
31, 2012. As a result, this document
confirms that the October 1 final rule
will not be changed and its effective
date is November 30, 2012.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: This document
confirms that the Department’s final
rule at 77 FR 59793 is effective on
November 30, 2012.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna L. O’Berry, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Transportation,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W96–320, Washington, DC 20590;
telephone: (202) 366–6136; email:
donna.o’berry@dot.gov.
As the
Department received no comments on
its final rule published on October 1,
2012, we are making no changes to the
rule and its effective date is November
30, 2012.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
14, 2012.
Ronald Jackson,
Assistant General Counsel for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–28303 Filed 11–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
ACTION:
Final rules.
These final rules govern landuse-exemption permits for solid waste
rail transfer facilities. The Clean
Railroads Act of 2008 amended the U.S.
Code to restrict the jurisdiction of the
Surface Transportation Board over solid
waste rail transfer facilities. The Act
also added three new statutory
provisions that address the Board’s
regulation of such facilities, which is
now limited to issuance of ‘‘land-useexemption permits’’ in certain
circumstances. In 2009, as required by
the Act, the Board issued interim rules.
In 2011, based on the comments
received and further evaluation, the
Board revised the 2009 Rules and
sought comments on the changes. After
further evaluation and review of the
comments received on the 2011 Rules,
the Board now adopts the 2011 Rules as
final rules with minor modification.
DATES: These rules will be effective on
December 21, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lucille Marvin, The Office of Public
Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and
Compliance, (202) 245–0238. Assistance
for the hearing impaired is available
through the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean
Railroads Act of 2008, Public Law 110–
432, 122 Stat. 4848, (CRA) amended 49
U.S.C. 10501(c)(2) to restrict the
jurisdiction of the Surface
Transportation Board (Board or STB)
over solid waste rail transfer facilities.
The CRA also added three new statutory
provisions—49 U.S.C. 10908–10910—
that address the Board’s regulation of
such facilities, which is now limited to
issuance of ‘‘land-use-exemption
permits’’ in certain circumstances.
Under the CRA, a solid waste rail
transfer facility must comply with all
applicable federal and state
requirements respecting the prevention
and abatement of pollution, the
protection and restoration of the
environment, and the protection of
public health and safety, in the same
manner as any similar solid waste
management facility not owned or
operated by or on behalf of a rail carrier,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69769
except for laws affecting the siting of the
facility that are covered by the land-useexemption permit. As required by the
CRA, the Board issued interim rules in
a decision served January 14, 2009.
Solid Waste Rail Transfer Facilities
(2009 Decision), EP 684 (STB served Jan.
14, 2009). Those interim rules were
published in the Federal Register on
January 27, 2009 (74 FR 4714) (2009
Rules). Based on the comments received
and further evaluation, the Board served
a decision on March 11, 2011, which
revised the 2009 Rules and sought
comments on the changes. Solid Waste
Rail Transfer Facilities (2011 Decision),
EP 684 (STB served Mar. 11, 2011). The
revised interim rules were published in
the Federal Register on March 24, 2011
(76 FR 16538) (2011 Rules). After
further evaluation and review of the
comments received on the 2011 Rules,
the Board now adopts the 2011 Rules as
final rules with minor modifications.
The final rules are set forth below.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10501(a), the Board
has jurisdiction over ‘‘transportation by
rail carrier.’’ Section 10501(b), as
modified by the ICC Termination Act of
1995 (ICCTA), Public Law 104–88, 109
Stat. 803 (1995), provides that both
‘‘[t]he jurisdiction of the Board over
transportation by rail carriers’’ (which
includes the carriers’ rail facilities, see
49 U.S.C. 10102(9)), and ‘‘the remedies
provided under [49 U.S.C. 10101–
11908]’’ are ‘‘exclusive,’’ and ‘‘preempt
the remedies provided under Federal or
State law.’’ Prior to enactment of the
CRA, the Board’s preemptive
jurisdiction extended to solid waste rail
transfer facilities owned or operated by
rail carriers. Accordingly, state
permitting or preclearance requirements
(including environmental, zoning, and
often land-use requirements) that, by
their nature, could be used to deny a
railroad the right to conduct its
operations or proceed with
transportation activities at rail transfer
facilities, including solid waste rail
transfer facilities, as authorized by the
Board, were preempted. See 49 U.S.C.
10501(b); N.Y. Susquehanna & W. Ry. v.
Jackson, 500 F.3d 238, 252–55 (3d Cir.
2007); Green Mountain R.R. v. Vermont,
404 F.3d 638, 641–43 (2d Cir. 2005).
Other state actions related to these
facilities were preempted if, as applied,
they would have the effect of
unreasonably burdening or interfering
with transportation by rail carrier. See
N.Y. Susquehanna, 500 F.3d at 252;
Green Mountain, 404 F.3d at 643.
The CRA modified the Board’s
jurisdiction over solid waste rail transfer
facilities. The CRA provides that solid
waste rail transfer facilities, as defined
in 49 U.S.C. 10908(e)(1)(H), must now
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
69770
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
In the 2011 Decision, slip op. at 7–8,
the Board concluded that an EIS
generally should be prepared for each
land-use-exemption-permit application.
NSWMA argues that, consequently, the
Board should add separate
environmental notice procedures to the
CRA rules to allow for full public
participation during the early stages of
the Board’s environmental review,
including ‘‘scoping’’—the process that
determines the issues to be addressed in
an EIS.4 NSWMA points out that 49 CFR
1105.10(a) of the Board’s environmental
rules requires an applicant for a Board
action that warrants an EIS to give the
Board’s Office of Environmental
Analysis (OEA) six months’ notice prior
to filing its application, but does not
require the applicant to serve the notice
on affected state and local agencies or
otherwise publish it.5 NSWMA is
concerned that, unless state and local
officials are served with the § 1105.10(a)
notice when it is filed at the Board,
these public officials will lose the
opportunity to participate meaningfully
in ‘‘key EIS scoping proceedings’’ for
projects seeking land-use-exemption
permits.6 NSWMA contrasts the absence
of advance environmental notice in the
interim and revised interim CRA rules
with the advance notice that the Board
requires for applications for a land-useexemption permit.7
We reject NSWMA’s assertion that the
Board’s procedures do not give regional,
state or local officials a meaningful
opportunity to participate at the early
stages of the EIS process and that
additional notice is necessary. The
Board’s existing procedures provide that
consultation letters are sent by the
Board to potentially interested or
affected Federal, state, and local
agencies, soliciting their comments on
possible environmental impacts, prior to
publication of a Notice of Intent to
Prepare an EIS. See Policy Statement on
Use of Third-Party Contracting in
Preparation of Envtl. Documentation, 5
S.T.B. 467 (2001); see also 40 CFR
1501.2(d)(2). Thus, the Board’s existing
procedures give public officials the
opportunity for early input into the
process of developing the scope of the
Draft EIS. But the opportunity for early
participation in the environmental
review process does not stop there. The
Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS,
which includes a description of the
proposed action and provides a period
for written comments on the draft scope
of the EIS, is then published in the
1 The CRA does not affect the Board’s
jurisdiction, or the scope of Federal preemption,
over a rail carrier’s transportation-related activities
involving commodities other than solid waste. 49
U.S.C. 10908(d).
2 The 2009 Decision and the 2011 Decision
contain further discussion of the CRA and the
Board’s initial and subsequent implementation of
the legislation.
3 The Board received comments and replies from
the following: Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection (CTEP); National Solid
Wastes Management Association, et al. (NSWMA);
Association of American Railroads (AAR); Atlantic
County Utilities Authority (ACUA); New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection and New
Jersey Meadowlands Commission (collectively,
NJDEP); and the Township of Bensalem, Bucks
County, Pennsylvania (Bensalem). Additionally,
after the deadline for initial comments, the Board
received comments from the Rhode Island Resource
Recovery Corporation (RIRRC). As no party would
be prejudiced, we will accept this late filing.
4 NSWMA’s Comments 2–4; CTEP’s Comments 1
(adopting NSWMA’s comments).
5 We note that the 6-month prefiling requirement
that NSWMA relies on is frequently waived. See 49
CFR 1105.10(c)(2); see, e.g., Tongue River R.R.—Rail
Construction & Operation—In Custer, Powder River
& Rosebud Cntys., Mont., FD 30186, letter from
Victoria Rutson, Director, Office of Environmental
Analysis (Oct. 18, 2012); R.J. Corman R.R.—
Construction & Operation Exemption—In Clearfield
Cnty., Pa., FD 35116, letter from Victoria Rutson,
Director, Office of Environmental Analysis (Jan. 24,
2008). As a practical matter, many applicants do not
have their projects adequately developed to allow
the environmental review to begin months in
advance of the filing of an application.
6 NSWMA’s Comments 3.
7 Pursuant to 49 CFR 1155.20(a)(2) and 1155.22(b)
of the 2011 Rules, the Notice of Intent and
Application must each be served on the governor,
municipality, state, and any relevant Federal or
state regional planning entity where the facility is
located. The Notice of Intent must also be published
at least once during each of three consecutive weeks
in a newspaper of general circulation in the county
in which the facility is located. 49 CFR
1155.20(a)(2).
comply with all applicable Federal and
state requirements (including
environmental requirements) that apply
to similar solid waste management
facilities that are not owned or operated
by or on behalf of a rail carrier, except
as otherwise provided in the CRA.1 The
CRA gives the Board the authority, if
petitioned, to issue land-use-exemption
permits that preempt state and local
laws and regulations ‘‘affecting the
siting’’ of such facilities (except to the
extent that the Board requires the
facility to comply with such provisions).
49 U.S.C. 10909(f).2
The Final Rules
The Board received comments on the
2011 Rules.3 We now adopt final rules
based on suggestions made in the
parties’ comments and on the Board’s
review of the revised interim
regulations. We address the comments
received on the 2011 Rules and our
revisions made in response to the
comments below. The final rules are in
full below.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) Notice
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Register and served. 49 CFR
1105.10(a)(2). The scoping process also
typically includes a meeting in the
project area that gives state and local
officials and members of the public an
opportunity to be heard. The Board
issues a final scope of study for the EIS
only after considering the scoping
comments.8 Therefore, we find that no
additional notice is necessary.
NSWMA also is concerned that state
and local officials and the public will
not receive notice of requests submitted
by applicants to OEA seeking to
reclassify the requirement that an EIS be
prepared in particular cases under 49
CFR 1155.24(a) 9 and 1105.6(d) because
such requests are not published in the
Federal Register.10 We do not believe
that Federal Register publication is
necessary. Section 1105.6(d) of the Code
of Federal Regulations has been in effect
since 1991. See Implementation of
Envtl. Laws, EP 55 (Sub-No. 22A) (ICC
served July 31, 1991); 56 FR 36104 (July
31, 1991). In recent years, OEA has
received a number of reclassification
requests. For example, rail construction
cases normally require preparation of an
EIS. Nevertheless, in certain rail
construction cases where there is little
potential for significant environmental
impacts, applicants have requested that
OEA reclassify the level of
environmental review to allow for the
preparation of a more limited
Environmental Assessment rather than
an EIS. Until now, however, we have
not received any suggestions that
8 Opportunities for public input on
environmental issues continue throughout the
duration of the proceeding. Following scoping, the
Board prepares a Draft EIS, which is made available
for review and comment by the public, government
agencies, and other interested parties (typically for
45 days). Thereafter, a Final EIS is issued that
considers comments on the Draft EIS, sets forth any
additional analyses, and makes final environmental
recommendations for the Board to consider in
reaching its final decision. Finally, our CRA
procedures specifically allow for final public
comments following the conclusion of the
environmental review on how the information
developed during the environmental review should
be weighed with transportation and other concerns.
49 CFR 1155.23(b).
9 We note that, contrary to AAR’s assertion in its
reply brief, a written request to reclassify pursuant
to §§ 1155.24(a) and 1105.6(d) is distinct from a
petition for waiver pursuant to § 1155.22(d)(4). (See
AAR’s Reply Comments 9 n.5.) A petition for
waiver of regulations pertaining to applications for
land-use-exemption permits must be issued by the
Director of the Office of Proceedings. 49 CFR
1155.22(d)(4). Requests to reclassify the
environmental review requirements must be
decided by the Director of OEA. 49 CFR 1155.24(a)
(‘‘OEA may reclassify the environmental review
requirements * * *, pursuant to 49 CFR
1105.6(d).’’); 49 CFR 1105.2 (‘‘The [Director] of
[OEA] * * * is delegated the authority * * * to
render initial decisions on requests for waiver or
modification of any of these rules for individual
proceedings * * * .’’).
10 NSWMA’s Comments 3.
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register publication is needed
to provide adequate notice of a request
to reclassify the level of environmental
review for a proposed action.
Our CRA rules are designed to give
interested state and local officials and
the public the ability to protect their
interest in having the Board conduct an
appropriate level of environmental
review of applications for land use
exemption permits. Sections
1155.20(a)(2) and 1155.22(b) will
provide for notice to agencies and
interested persons in the project area
that an application for a particular land
use exemption permit is to be filed.
Once a case is docketed at the Board,
interested persons and agencies can
keep track of the status of the case,
including requests to reclassify the level
of environmental review and any
responses, by checking the Board’s Web
site. Moreover, state and local
environmental officials are likely to
have advance notice of proposed solid
waste rail transfer facilities because
these facilities would have to comply
with the same applicable Federal and
state requirements as non-rail solid
waste management facilities, except for
laws affecting siting that are covered by
the application for a land-useexemption permit. Finally, even if a
request for reclassification of the EIS
requirement is granted, state and local
officials and the public have numerous
opportunities during the environmental
review process to argue to the Board
that the environmental impacts of the
project will be significant enough to
require the preparation of an EIS. See
supra n.8. When information emerges
during the environmental review
process to indicate that a proposed
action could result in potentially
significant environmental impacts, the
Board will heighten the level of
environmental review as appropriate.
See Norfolk S. Ry.—Joint Control &
Operating/Pooling Agreements—Pan
Am S., LLC, FD 35147 et al., slip op. at
2–3 (STB served Sept. 25, 2008)
(suspending procedural schedule to
prepare an Environmental Assessment
in case where it had been originally
determined that no environmental
review was necessary).
B. EIS Requirements
NJDEP argues that 49 CFR 1155.21(c)
does not reflect the Board’s
determination in 49 CFR 1155.24(a) that
an EIS generally should be prepared for
each land-use-exemption-permit
application.11 Section 1155.21(c) states
that an ‘‘applicant shall certify that it
has submitted an Environmental and/or
11 NJDEP’s
Comments 3.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
Historic Report * * * if an
Environmental and/or Historic Report is
required.’’ 49 CFR 1155.21(c).12 NJDEP
asks that the Board remove the clause
‘‘if an Environmental and/or Historic
Report is required’’ from this section.
It would be inappropriate to grant
NJDEP’s request. As the Board
specifically stated in the 2011 Decision,
slip op. at 25–26 (citing 49 CFR
1105.10(d)), applicants need not file
Environmental and/or Historic Reports
describing the potential environmental
impacts of their proposals if third-party
contractors are used to assist the
environmental staff in preparing the
Board’s environmental documentation,
which generally will be an EIS. Thus,
the 2011 Rules properly made clear that,
even when a third-party contractor is
used and Environmental and/or Historic
Reports are not required from the
applicant, the Board can still prepare an
EIS.
NJDEP also argues that the clause in
§ 1155.21(c) stating ‘‘if an
Environmental and/or Historic Report is
required’’ conflicts with 49 CFR
1155.20(c). The latter section states that
‘‘[a]pplicant must also submit an
Environmental and/or Historic Report
containing the information described at
49 CFR 1155.[24](b),13 1105.7, and
1105.8, to the extent applicable, at least
45 days prior to filing an application.’’ 14
Although § 1155.20(c) does not include
the language ‘‘if an Environmental and/
or Historic Report is required,’’ it does
specifically acknowledge later in that
section that the ‘‘reporting requirements
that would otherwise apply are waived
* * * if the applicant or the Board hires
a third-party consultant.’’ Thus, there is
no conflict between the two sections.
Nevertheless, for clarity, we will add a
reference in § 1155.21(c) to § 1155.20(c).
12 We have made minor editorial changes to the
2011 Rules, including capitalizing ‘‘Environmental
Report’’ and ‘‘Historic Report’’ consistently
throughout.
13 The 2011 Rules inadvertently cited to 49 CFR
1155.25(b) rather than 49 CFR 1155.24(b). We have
revised the final rules to cite the correct regulation.
See infra note 31 and accompanying text.
14 In response to several comments on the 2009
Rules, the Board noted in the 2011 Decision that,
although 49 CFR 1105.7 does not address issues
specific to solid waste management, much of the
information in the environmental reporting rules
does apply to solid waste rail transfer facilities.
Thus, the Board concluded that it would ‘‘continue
to require applicants to comply with the
environmental reporting requirements in 49 CFR
1105.7 to the extent applicable.’’ 2011 Decision, slip
op. at 25. Several provisions of these rules also
contain the proviso that Environmental Reports
should contain the information described at
§ 1105.7, to the extent applicable. 49 CFR
1155.20(c), 1155.24(b). We have revised
§ 1155.21(c) to add ‘‘to the extent applicable’’ to
comport with § 1155.20(c), § 1155.24(b) and our
discussion in the 2011 Decision.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69771
C. Interpretation of 49 U.S.C. 10910
In the 2011 Decision, the Board added
a procedural requirement that
applicants and interested parties state
whether the law affecting siting from
which exemption is sought is an
environmental, public health, or public
safety standard that falls under the
traditional police powers of the state,
and if not, to explain why not. 2011
Decision, slip op. at 5; 49 CFR
1155.21(a)(7). The Board reasoned that
this information was necessary because
of 49 U.S.C. 10910 and the Board’s
standard for review in revised 49 CFR
1155.26(b)(6),15 and stated that, if a law
affecting siting is covered by 49 U.S.C.
10910, the Board will not issue a landuse-exemption permit unless the
applicant has shown that compliance
with that law meets the unreasonable
burden or discrimination test. 2011
Decision, slip op. at 5
The procedural requirement in
§ 1155.21(a)(7), and the Board’s
substantive standard of review found at
§ 1155.26(b)(6), were based on the
Board’s interpretation of § 10910, which
provides that ‘‘[n]othing in section
10908 or 10909 is intended to affect the
traditional police powers of the State to
require a rail carrier to comply with
State and local environmental, public
health, and public safety standards that
are not unreasonably burdensome and
do not discriminate against rail
carriers.’’ When the 2009 Rules and
2011 Rules were issued, the Board read
§ 10910 as confirming judicial and
Board precedent establishing that,
notwithstanding the express Federal
preemption in 49 U.S.C. 10501(b), state
and local bodies nonetheless retain
police powers to protect the public
health and safety, so long as the state
and local regulations do not serve to
regulate railroad operations or
unreasonably interfere with interstate
commerce. E.g., N.Y. Susquehanna, 500
F.3d at 252–55; Green Mountain, 404
F.3d at 643. Consistent with this
precedent, the Board, notwithstanding
the separate express preemption
provisions of § 10909, interpreted the
CRA as preserving the state’s historic
police powers to protect public health
and safety where the law in question
does not unreasonably burden interstate
15 Section 1155.26(b)(6) of the 2011 Rules, which
was also located in the Board’s 2009 Rules at 49
CFR 1155.27(b)(4), states that ‘‘[a] land-useexemption permit will not exempt a state
requirement that a rail carrier comply with an
environmental, public health, or public safety
standard that falls under the traditional police
powers of the state unless the requirement is
unreasonably burdensome to interstate commerce
or discriminates against rail carriers.’’
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
69772
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
commerce or discriminate against rail
transportation.
AAR, however, argues that the Board
misinterpreted 49 U.S.C. 10910 and that
the Board can issue a land-useexemption permit under section 10909
even if the law affecting siting falls
under the state’s traditional police
powers and the requirement does not
unreasonably burden interstate
commerce or discriminate against rail
carriers.16 AAR points to the balancing
of interests contemplated by section
10909(c) and (d), which, it claims,
suggests that no single factor, such as
the absence of an undue burden on
interstate commerce, requires denial of
a land-use-exemption permit. It further
argues that section 10909(f) provides the
Board with express authority to preempt
‘‘all’’ state laws affecting siting of a solid
waste rail transfer facility, including
those that might otherwise fall under
the traditional police powers of the
state. Arguing that the specific
provisions of § 10909 dictate the proper
interpretation of section 10910, AAR
believes that section 10910 should be
read to state that ‘‘[Other than with
respect to state laws and requirements
affecting siting, n]othing in section
10908 or 10909 is intended to affect the
traditional police powers of the State to
require a rail carrier to comply with
State and local environmental, public
health, and public safety standards that
are not unreasonably burdensome and
do not discriminate against rail
carriers.’’ 17
We find that both AAR’s
interpretation of section 10910 and the
one originally adopted by the Board are
plausible readings of the statute. The
statute is ambiguous, and the Board has
struggled to interpret a number of its
provisions, including section 10910. At
this juncture, however, we need not
resolve the statutory ambiguity by
definitively choosing one interpretation
of section 10910 over the other. We do
not need to interpret section 10910
definitively in order to effectively carry
out the intent of Congress in the CRA.
As AAR acknowledges, the Board has
the discretion not to preempt a law
affecting siting.18 Therefore, the difficult
question regarding the preemptive effect
of section 10910 would only arise in the
event that an applicant for a land-use16 AAR also claims that our interpretation of
section 10910 in the 2011 Decision conflicts with
our interpretation of that section in the 2009
Decision. (AAR’s Comments 4.) Given our decision
here, there is no need to address this argument.
17 AAR’s Comments 6 n.5, 20 n.12.
18 AAR’s Comments 6 n.5 (citing 49 U.S.C.
10909(f) (‘‘An exemption may require compliance
with such State laws, regulations, orders, or other
requirements.’’)).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
exemption permit were to make a
persuasive case that the Board should
preempt a law affecting siting
promulgated under the state’s
traditional police powers that does not
impose an unreasonable burden on
interstate commerce and was not being
used to discriminate against a rail
carrier. We cannot predict whether this
scenario will come before the Board.
Should the situation described above
arise in the future, the Board will, as
appropriate, examine the meaning of
section 10910 in the context of that
specific factual dispute and the
particular state law in question.
Accordingly, we will remove interim
rule § 1155.26(b)(6) from our final
rules.19
With respect to the procedural
requirement in § 1155.21(a)(7) of our
interim rules, the information requested
in that rule would assist the Board in
deciding whether to issue a land-useexemption permit. The CRA specifically
permits the Board to ‘‘consider and give
due weight to’’ six enumerated factors,
as well as ‘‘any other relevant factors, as
determined by the Board.’’ 49 U.S.C.
10909(d). Although AAR disagreed with
the statutory interpretation of section
10910 in the 2011 Decision, it did not
specifically object to the imposition of
a procedural requirement requesting
information on whether the law from
which exemption is sought is a public
health or safety standard that falls under
the traditional police powers of the
state. In fact, AAR acknowledged that
the extent of the burden placed on
interstate commerce, and whether the
law discriminates against rail carriers,
are factors in deciding whether to issue
a preemptive land-use-exemption
permit.20 We will thus continue to
require the information requested in 49
CFR 1155.21(a)(7).
D. Effect of Land-Use-Exemption Permit
NJDEP believes that 49 CFR
1155.26(d) of the 2011 Rules does not
reflect the Board’s intent. Specifically,
NJDEP points to the Board’s statement
in the 2011 Decision that ‘‘[u]ltimately,
a land-use-exemption permit would
only exempt a facility from complying
with laws, regulations, and orders
affecting the siting that are specified in
the permit. The Board will require the
applicant to comply with all other laws,
regulations, orders, or other
requirements affecting the siting of a
facility.’’ 2011 Decision, slip op. at 5.
NJDEP argues that this statement
conflicts with § 1155.26(d) of our 2011
Rules, which states in relevant part that
‘‘a Board-issued land-use-exemption
permit will require compliance with
such state laws, regulations, orders, or
other requirements not otherwise
expressly exempted in the permit unless
the Board determines otherwise.’’ 49
CFR 1155.26(d). NJDEP believes that the
qualifier at the end of this section
should be removed. We agree that the
language of this section does not reflect
the fact that a land-use-exemption
permit will exempt only those laws
specified in the permit, and will reword
that section in order to clarify the effect
of a permit. Section 1155.26(d) will now
state as follows: ‘‘If the Board grants a
land-use-exemption permit for a solid
waste rail transfer facility, such permit
would only exempt a facility from
complying with state laws, regulations,
orders, or other requirements affecting
the siting of a facility that are specified
therein. The permit will require
compliance with all other state laws,
regulations, orders, or other
requirements not otherwise expressly
exempted in the permit.’’
E. The Process To Come Before the
Board
CTEP and NSWMA request that the
Board require, as a prerequisite, that an
applicant seek state or local approval
under the challenged laws and rules
before they can be included on the list
to be preempted under 49 CFR
1155.21(7), unless it is ineffective or
demonstrably futile to do so.21 This
request was also adopted by ACUA,
Bensalem, and RIRRC.22
As the Board previously explained in
the 2011 Decision, slip op. at 10, this
suggestion conflicts with the language of
the CRA, which explains that a rail
carrier that owns or operates a facility
may come before the Board prior to
seeking a siting determination from the
state. See 49 U.S.C. 10909(a)(1). Thus,
we will not adopt the proposed change.
F. Definition of ‘‘State Requirements’’
ACUA notes that, pursuant to 49 CFR
1155.2(e), ‘‘[s]tate requirements * * *
does not include the laws, regulations,
ordinances, orders, or other
requirements of a political subdivision
of a state, including a locality or
municipality, unless a state expressly
delegates such authority to such
political subdivision.’’ 23 ACUA states
that ‘‘it should be noted that in New
Jersey, and perhaps other states,
delegation of state authority may be to
21 CTEP’s
19 Former
§ 1155.26(b)(7) is now renumbered as
§ 1155.26(b)(6) in the final rules.
20 AAR’s Comments 14–15.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments 1; NSWMA’s Comments 4.
Comments 1; Bensalem’s Comments 1;
RIRRC’s Comments 1.
23 ACUA’s Comments 1.
22 ACUA’s
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
an entity other than a ‘locality or
municipality’ and that a utility authority
may * * * constitute a political
subdivision.’’ 24 Section 1155.2(e)
mirrors the language of 49 U.S.C.
10908(e)(3), the plain language of which
indicates that a political subdivision of
a state includes a locality or
municipality, but may also include
other entities. We will continue to
follow the language of the statute.
ACUA also states that ‘‘entities such
as County Utilities Authorities in New
Jersey which have been designated as
the implementation agency for the State
Solid Waste Management Plan should
be entitled to notice at each level of the
process.’’ 25 In response to the comment,
we will broaden the list of entities that
are required to receive service of
applications for land-use-exemption
permits and related Notices of Intent to
include any agency designated as the
implementation agency for the solid
waste management plan of the state in
which the solid waste rail transfer
facility is located or proposed to be
located. We have adjusted 49 CFR
1155.20(a)(2)(ii), 1155.22(b),
1155.22(d)(4), 1155.25(a), and
1155.25(b) accordingly.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
G. Other Comments
AAR suggests that we add language to
49 CFR 1155.2(a)(10)(ii)(B). Specifically,
AAR argues that instead of stating ‘‘a
facility where solid waste is transferred
or transloaded solely from a tank truck
directly to a rail tank car,’’, that section
should read ‘‘to or from a tank truck
directly to a rail tank car,’’.26 The
language of that section, however,
mirrors the language of 49 U.S.C.
10908(e)(1)(H)(ii)(II).27 We will continue
to follow the language of the statute.
AAR also proposes that we modify the
language of 49 CFR 1155.20(a) and
1155.22(a) so that an applicant need not
file a Notice of Intent if it is required to
submit an application due to a
governor’s petition pursuant to 49 CFR
1155.13. AAR argues that the petition
would provide sufficient notice of
intent.28 As such, AAR requests that the
Board revise the language of
§ 1155.20(a) to ‘‘Except where an
application is required by Subpart B,
[a]n applicant * * * shall give its
Notice of Intent to file a land-useexemption-permit application by
complying with the following
24 ACUA’s
Comments 1.
Comments 1.
26 AAR’s Comments 20.
27 Section 1155.2(a)(10)(ii)(B) of the 2011 Rules
erroneously quoted the CRA with respect to the
word ‘‘solely.’’ We are correcting that here so that
the final rule mirrors the CRA.
28 AAR’s Comments 20.
25 ACUA’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
procedures * * * .’’ Similarly, AAR
requests that the Board revise the
language of § 1155.22(a) to ‘‘Except
where an application is required by
Subpart B, [t]he applicant shall tender
with its application an affidavit attesting
to its compliance with the notice
requirements of 49 CFR 1155.20.’’ We
decline to adopt AAR’s proposed
changes. We believe that all applicants,
including those who are required to file
an application pursuant to a governor’s
petition, should comply with the
application procedures, including the
Notice of Intent provisions, provided in
Subpart C. A Notice of Intent under
Subpart C provides broader notice than
a petition under Subpart B,29 and it also
serves to notify the Board and all parties
that the application process is
commencing.
AAR also notes that the schedule in
49 CFR 1155.26(a)(2) omits the
deadlines for the Notice of Intent.30 We
will add language to § 1155.26(a)(2) to
account for the deadlines for the Notice
of Intent.
Both AAR and NJDEP accurately note
that certain references in the revised
interim rules to 49 CFR 1155.25 are in
error.31 Section 1155.21(c) should read
‘‘[t]he applicant shall certify that it has
submitted an Environmental and/or
Historic Report containing the
information in 49 CFR 1155.24(b),
1105.7, and 1105.8 * * * .’’ Similarly,
the first sentence of § 1155.20(c) has
been revised to read ‘‘[a]pplicant must
also submit an Environmental and/or
Historic Report containing the
information described at 49 CFR
1155.24(b), 1105.7, and 1105.8 * * * .’’
Finally, the citation at the end of
§ 1155.20(c) has been changed to 49 CFR
1155.24(c).
ACUA poses a question regarding 49
CFR 1155.12(b), which pertains to
facilities which were in existence on
October 16, 2008, but have since ceased
operations. Assuming a facility can
prove it was operating as a solid waste
29 Under Subpart C, 49 CFR 1155.20 provides that
an applicant shall serve its Notice of Intent on the
Board; the governor of the state where the facility
is located; the municipality, state, and any relevant
political subdivision of a state or federal or state
regional planning entity in the jurisdiction of which
the facility is located; and the appropriate managing
government agencies responsible for the groups of
land listed in 49 U.S.C. 10909(c)(2). Additionally,
the applicant must publish its Notice of Intent at
least once during each of three consecutive weeks
in a newspaper of general circulation in each
county in which any part of the facility is located.
By contrast, under Subpart B, 49 CFR 1155.11
provides that a petition filed by the governor be
filed with the Board; served on the rail carrier that
owns or operates the facility; and served on the
facility, if its address is different than that of the
rail carrier’s.
30 AAR’s Comments 21.
31 AAR’s Comments 20; NJDEP’s Comments 4.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69773
rail transfer facility on October 16, 2008,
and has since ceased operations, ACUA
wonders whether § 1155.12(b) would
render the facility, should it seek to
restore operations, subject to review as
a proposed facility. ACUA also asks
under what circumstances, if any, a
facility which ‘‘no longer operates as
such’’ may allege continuous operations
to maintain its exemption. We will not
address those issues in this proceeding
because the answers would depend on
the factual circumstances of the
particular case.
Paperwork Reduction, Regulatory
Flexibility, and Environmental
Certifications
In the 2011 Decision, published in the
Federal Register at 76 FR 16538 on
March 24, 2011, the Board sought
comments pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501–
3549, and Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) regulations at 5 CFR
1320.11, regarding: (1) Whether the
collection of information associated
with the land-use-exemption permit
application is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Board, including whether the collection
has practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
the Board’s burden estimates; (3) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
when appropriate. No comments related
to these questions were received.
The proposed rules were submitted to
OMB for review as required under the
PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), and 5 CFR
1320.11. No comments were received
from OMB, which approved the
collection, titled ‘‘Applications for
Land-Use-Exemption Permits,’’ and
assigned it Control No. 2140–0018.
Unless renewed, OMB approval expires
June 30, 2014. The display of a currently
valid OMB control number for this
collection is required by law. Under the
PRA and 5 CFR 1320.11, an agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act at 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we
certify that the final rules will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The basis for this determination is as
follows. While applicants for land-useexemption permits could be small
entities, as defined in 13 CFR part 121,
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
69774
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
under neither the statute nor the final
rules could the Board, on its own,
require a party to apply for a Board
permit. See 49 U.S.C. 10908(b)(2)(B),
10909(a). In general, that decision is
solely within the control of the entity.
The one exception is that a governor of
the state in which an existing facility is
located could petition the Board, under
49 U.S.C. 10908(b)(2)(B) and 49 CFR
part 1155 subpart B, to require that
facility to obtain a land-use-exemption
permit in order for it to continue to
operate. Even in that circumstance, the
authority lies with the state governors—
not the Board—to initiate the Board’s
processes. In all other scenarios, a party
can avoid being subject to the Board’s
rules regarding land-use-exemption
permits by complying with state
requirements. Therefore, the final rules
will not circumscribe or mandate the
conduct of a substantial number of
small entities.
Moreover, any burdens imposed on
small entities come from the plain
language of the CRA and the
requirements that Congress has imposed
on this agency. In revising our 2009
Rules and 2011 Rules, we have
attempted to simplify the process
wherever possible. Finally, we have
provided a waiver provision that could
mitigate any negative impacts on small
entities. Our rules specifically provide
that an applicant may request a waiver
of any particular part of the application
procedures. See 49 CFR 1155.22(d)(4).
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of
energy resources.
It is ordered:
1. The rules set forth below are
adopted as final rules.
2. Notice of this decision will be
published in the Federal Register. The
final rules will be effective on December
21, 2012.
3. A copy of this decision will be
served upon the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy, Office of Advocacy, U.S.
Small Business Administration.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 1155
Administrative practice and
procedure.
Decided: November 14, 2012.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner
Begeman.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Surface Transportation
Board revises part 1155 of title 49,
chapter X, of the Code of Federal
Regulations to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
PART 1155—SOLID WASTE RAIL
TRANSFER FACILITIES
Subpart A—General
Sec.
1155.1 Purpose and scope.
1155.2 Definitions.
Subpart B—Procedures Governing
Petitions To Require a Facility in Existence
on October 16, 2008, To Apply for a LandUse-Exemption Permit
1155.10 Contents of petition.
1155.11 Filing and service of petition.
1155.12 Participation in petition
procedures.
1155.13 Board determination with respect
to a Governor’s petition.
Subpart C—Procedures Governing
Applications for a Land-Use-Exemption
Permit
1155.20 Notice of intent to apply for a landuse-exemption permit.
1155.21 Contents of application.
1155.22 Filings and service of application.
1155.23 Participation in application
proceedings.
1155.24 Environmental review.
1155.25 Transfer and termination of a landuse-exemption permit.
1155.26 Board determinations under 49
U.S.C. 10909.
1155.27 Petitions to modify, amend, or
revoke a land-use-exemption permit.
Appendix A to Part 1155—Form Notice of
Intent To Apply
Appendix B to Part 1155—Form Federal
Register Notice
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 721(a), 10908, 10909,
10910.
PART 1155—SOLID WASTE RAIL
TRANSFER FACILITIES
Subpart A—General
§ 1155.1
Purpose and scope.
49 U.S.C. 10501(c)(2)(B) excludes
solid waste rail transfer facilities from
the Board’s jurisdiction except as
provided under 49 U.S.C. 10908 and
10909. Sections 10908 and 10909
provide the Board authority to issue
land-use-exemption permits for solid
waste rail transfer facilities when
certain conditions are met. The
regulations in this part concern landuse-exemption permits and the Board’s
standard for review.
§ 1155.2
Definitions.
(a) Unless otherwise provided in the
text of these regulations, the following
definitions apply in this part:
(1) Commercial and retail waste
means material discarded by stores,
offices, restaurants, warehouses,
nonmanufacturing activities at
industrial facilities, and other similar
establishments or facilities.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(2) Construction and demolition
debris means waste building materials,
packaging, and rubble resulting from
construction, remodeling, repair, and
demolition operations on pavements,
houses, commercial buildings, and other
structures.
(3) Environmental Impact Statement
or ‘‘EIS’’ means the detailed written
statement required by the National
Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(c), for a major federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment.
(4) Household waste means material
discarded by residential dwellings,
hotels, motels, and other similar
permanent or temporary housing
establishments or facilities.
(5) Industrial waste means the solid
waste generated by manufacturing and
industrial and research and
development processes and operations,
including contaminated soil,
nonhazardous oil spill cleanup waste
and dry nonhazardous pesticides and
chemical waste, but does not include
hazardous waste regulated under
subtitle C of the Solid Waste Disposal
Act (42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.), mining or
oil and gas waste.
(6) Institutional waste means material
discarded by schools, nonmedical waste
discarded by hospitals, material
discarded by nonmanufacturing
activities at prisons and government
facilities, and material discarded by
other similar establishments or
facilities.
(7) Municipal solid waste means
household waste, commercial and retail
waste, and institutional waste.
(8) Office of Environmental Analysis
or ‘‘OEA’’ means the Board staff that
prepares the Board’s environmental
documents and analyses.
(9) Solid waste means construction
and demolition debris; municipal solid
waste; household waste; commercial
and retail waste; institutional waste;
sludge; industrial waste; and other solid
waste, as determined appropriate by the
Board, but not waste generated by a rail
carrier during track, track structure, or
right-of-way construction, maintenance,
or repair (including railroad ties and
line-side poles), or waste generated as a
result of a railroad accident, incident, or
derailment.
(10) Solid waste rail transfer facility—
(i) Means the portion of a facility
owned or operated by or on behalf of a
rail carrier (as defined in 49 U.S.C.
10102) where solid waste, as a
commodity to be transported for a
charge, is collected, stored, separated,
processed, treated, managed, disposed
of, or transferred, when the activity
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
takes place outside of original shipping
containers; but
(ii) Does not include—
(A) The portion of a facility to the
extent that activities taking place at
such portion are comprised solely of the
railroad transportation of solid waste
after the solid waste is loaded for
shipment on or in a rail car, including
railroad transportation for the purpose
of interchanging railroad cars containing
solid waste shipments; or
(B) A facility where solid waste is
solely transferred or transloaded from a
tank truck directly to a rail tank car.
(11) Sludge means any solid, semisolid, or liquid waste generated from a
municipal, commercial, or industrial
wastewater treatment plant, water
supply treatment plant, or air pollution
control facility exclusive of the treated
effluent from a wastewater treatment
plant.
(b) Exceptions. Notwithstanding
paragraph (a) of this section, the terms
household waste, commercial and retail
waste, and institutional waste do not
include yard waste and refuse-derived
fuel; used oil; wood pallets; clean wood;
medical or infectious waste; or motor
vehicles (including motor vehicle parts
or vehicle fluff).
(c) Land-use-exemption permit means
the authorization issued by the Board
pursuant to the authority of 49 U.S.C.
10909(a) and includes the term ‘‘siting
permit’’ in 49 U.S.C. 10909(e).
(d) State laws, regulations, orders, or
other requirements affecting the siting of
a facility, as used in 49 U.S.C. 10909(f)
and 49 CFR 1155.27(d), include the
requirements of a state or a political
subdivision of a state, including a
locality or municipality, affecting the
siting of a facility.
(e) State requirement, as used in 49
U.S.C. 10908 does not include the laws,
regulations, ordinances, orders, or other
requirements of a political subdivision
of a state, including a locality or
municipality, unless a state expressly
delegates such authority to such
political subdivision.
Subpart B—Procedures Governing
Petitions To Require a Facility in
Existence on October 16, 2008, To
Apply for a Land-Use-Exemption
Permit
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1155.10
Contents of petition.
A petition to require a solid waste rail
transfer facility in existence on October
16, 2008, to apply for a land-useexemption permit, submitted by the
Governor of the state or that Governor’s
designee, shall contain the following
information:
(a) The Governor’s name.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
(b) The state’s name and the name of
any agency filing on behalf of the
Governor.
(c) The full address of the solid waste
rail transfer facility, or, if not available,
the city, state, and United States Postal
Service ZIP code.
(d) The name of the rail carrier that
owns or operates the facility or the rail
carrier on whose behalf the facility is
operated.
(e) A good-faith certification that the
facility qualified as a solid waste rail
transfer facility as defined in 49 U.S.C.
10908(e)(1)(H) and 49 CFR 1155.2, on
October 16, 2008.
(f) Relief sought (that the rail carrier
that owns or operates the facility be
required to apply for a land-useexemption permit).
(g) Name, title, and address of
representative of petitioner to whom
correspondence should be sent.
§ 1155.11
Filing and service of petition.
(a) When the petition is filed with the
Board, the petitioner shall serve
concurrently, by first class mail, a copy
of the petition on the rail carrier that
owns or operates the solid waste rail
transfer facility and on the facility if the
address is different than the rail carrier’s
address. A copy of the certificate of
service shall be filed with the Board at
the same time.
(b) Upon the filing of a petition, the
Board will review the petition and
determine whether it conforms to all
applicable regulations. If the petition is
substantially incomplete or is otherwise
defective, the Board will reject the
petition without prejudice for stated
reasons by order within 15 days from
the date of filing of the petition.
(c) If the petition is rejected, a revised
petition may be resubmitted, and the
Board will determine whether the
resubmitted application conforms with
all prescribed regulations.
§ 1155.12 Participation in petition
proceedings.
(a) An interested person may file a
reply to the petition challenging any of
the information contained in the
petition that is required by 49 CFR
1155.10(c) through (e) and may offer
evidence to support its contention. The
petitioner will have an opportunity to
file a rebuttal.
(b) A facility can acknowledge that it
was a solid waste rail transfer facility on
October 16, 2008, but no longer operates
as such and therefore is not required to
seek a land-use-exemption permit. To
do so, a facility must file with the Board
a certification stating that it:
(1) No longer operates as a solid waste
transfer facility;
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69775
(2) Understands that by certifying that
it no longer operates as a solid waste
transfer facility, it no longer qualifies as
a facility in existence on October 16,
2008 for purposes of the Clean Railroad
Act and these regulations; and
(3) Understands that if it seeks a landuse-exemption permit in the future, it
would be required to do so as a
proposed facility.
(c) Filing and service of replies. (1)
Any reply shall be filed with the Board
(the Chief, Section of Administration,
Office of Proceedings, Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20423) within 20 days
of the filing with the Board of the
petition.
(2) A copy of the reply shall be served
on petitioner or its representative at the
time of filing with the Board. Each filing
shall contain a certificate of service.
(3) Any rebuttal to a reply shall be
filed and served by petitioner no later
than 30 days after the filing of the
petition.
§ 1155.13 Board determination with
respect to a Governor’s petition.
The Board shall accept the Governor’s
complete petition on a finding that the
facility qualified as a solid waste rail
transfer facility, as defined in 49 U.S.C.
10908(e)(1)(H) and 49 CFR 1155.2, on
October 16, 2008. If the Board finds that
the facility currently does not qualify for
or require a land-use-exemption permit,
any future use of the facility as a solid
waste rail transfer facility would require
an application for a land-use-exemption
permit as a proposed facility and/or the
proper state permits. In a decision
granting the Governor’s petition, the
Board shall require that the rail carrier
that owns or operates the facility, or the
operator of the facility, file a land-useexemption-permit application within
120 days of the service date of the
decision.
Subpart C—Procedures Governing
Applications for a Land-UseExemption Permit
§ 1155.20 Notice of intent to apply for a
land-use-exemption permit.
(a) Filing and publication
requirements. An applicant (i.e., a solid
waste rail transfer facility, or the rail
carrier that owns or operates the facility)
shall give its Notice of Intent to file a
land-use-exemption-permit application
by complying with the following
procedures:
(1) Filing. Applicant must serve its
Notice of Intent on the Board in the
format prescribed in Appendix A to this
part. The Notice of Intent shall be filed
in accordance with the time
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
69776
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section.
(2) Service. Applicant must serve, by
first-class mail (unless otherwise
specified), its Notice of Intent upon:
(i) The Governor of the state where
the facility is located;
(ii) The municipality, the state, and
any relevant political subdivision of a
state or federal or state regional
planning entity in the jurisdiction of
which the solid waste rail transfer
facility is located or proposed to be
located; and
(iii) The appropriate managing
government agencies responsible for the
groups of land listed in 49 U.S.C.
10909(c)(2).
(3) Newspaper publication. Applicant
must publish its Notice of Intent at least
once during each of 3 consecutive
weeks in a newspaper of general
circulation in each county in which any
part of the proposed or existing facility
is located.
(b) Time limits. (1) The Notice of
Intent must be served on the parties
discussed above at least 15 days, but not
more than 30 days, prior to the filing of
the land-use-exemption-permit
application;
(2) The three required newspaper
Notices must be published within the
30-day period prior to the filing of the
application; and
(3) The Notice of Intent must be filed
with the Board either concurrently with
service on the required parties or when
the Notice is first published (whichever
occurs first).
(c) Environmental and Historic
Reports. Applicant must also submit an
Environmental and/or Historic Report
containing the information described at
49 CFR 1155.24(b), 1105.7, and 1105.8,
to the extent applicable, at least 45 days
prior to filing an application. OEA may
reject any report that it deems
inadequate. The environmental and
historic reporting requirements that
would otherwise apply are waived,
however, if the applicant or the Board
hires a third-party consultant, OEA
approves the scope of the consultant’s
work, and the consultant works under
OEA’s supervision to prepare an EIS or
other environmental documentation. In
such a case, the consultant acts on
behalf of the Board, working under
OEA’s direction to collect the needed
environmental information and compile
it into an EIS or other appropriate
environmental documentation. See 49
U.S.C. 10909(h); 49 CFR 1155.24(c).
§ 1155.21
Contents of application.
Applications for land-use-exemption
permits for the facility, and any
proposed future expansion within 10
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
years of the application date, shall
contain the following information,
including supporting documentation:
(a) General. (1) Exact name of
applicant.
(2) Whether applicant is a common
carrier by railroad subject to 49 U.S.C.
Subtitle IV, chapter 105.
(3) Summary of why a land-useexemption permit is being sought.
(4) The full address of the solid waste
rail transfer facility, or, if not available,
the city, state, and United States Postal
Service ZIP code.
(5) The name of the rail carrier that
owns or operates the facility or the rail
carrier on whose behalf the facility is
operated, the line of railroad serving the
facility, the milepost location of the
facility, and the milepost and names of
the stations that the facility is located
between.
(6) Name, title, and address of
representative of applicant to whom
comments should be sent.
(7) Copies of the specific state, local,
or municipal laws, regulations, orders,
or other requirements affecting the
siting of the solid waste rail transfer
facility from which the applicant
requests entire or partial exemption, any
publicly available material providing
the criteria for the application of the
state, local, or municipal laws,
regulations, orders, or other
requirements affecting the siting, and a
description of any action that the state,
local, or municipal authority has taken
affecting the siting of the facility. The
applicant shall state whether each law,
regulation, order or other requirement
from which an exemption is sought is
an environmental, public health, or
public safety standard that falls under
the traditional police powers of the
state. If the applicant states that the
requirement is not such a standard, it
shall explain the reasons for its
statement.
(8) Certification that the laws,
regulations, orders or other
requirements from which the applicant
requests exemption are not based on
federal laws, regulations, orders, or
other requirements.
(9) Certification that the facility
complies with all state, local, or
municipal laws, regulations, orders, or
other requirements affecting the siting of
the facility except for those from which
it seeks exemption.
(10) Certification that the applicant
has applied or will apply for the
appropriate state permits not affecting
siting.
(11) For facilities not in existence as
of October 16, 2008, certification that
the facility is not proposed to be located
on land within any unit of or land
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
affiliated with the National Park System,
the National Wildlife Refuge System,
the National Wilderness Preservation
System, the National Trails System, the
National Wild and Scenic Rivers
System, a National Reserve, or a
National Monument. For facilities in
existence as of October 16, 2008, state
whether the facility is located in any of
these types of lands.
(12) For facilities not in existence as
of October 16, 2008, certification that
the facility is not proposed to be located
on lands referenced in The Highlands
Conservation Act, Public Law No. 108–
421, for which a state has implemented
a conservation management plan, or,
that the facility is consistent with the
restrictions implemented by the
applicable state under The Highlands
Conservation Act, Public Law No. 108–
421, placed on its proposed location.
For facilities in existence as of October
16, 2008, state whether the facility is
located on any of these lands, and, if so,
address whether the facility is
consistent with the restrictions placed
on the location by the applicable state
under that law.
(13) An explanation of how the
facility comes within the Board’s
jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. 10501.
(14) The owner and operator of the
facility.
(15) The interest of the rail carrier in
the facility.
(16) An explanation of how the
facility meets the definition of a solid
waste rail transfer facility at 49 U.S.C.
10909(e)(1)(H).
(17) A statement whether the
applicant has sought permission from
the applicable state, local, or municipal
authority with respect to some or all of
the facility in its application and
received an unsatisfactory result
affecting the siting of the facility. The
applicant shall provide information
about the unsatisfactory result and shall
include all relevant orders, decisions, or
other notices of the denial.
(18) A detailed description of the
operations and activities that will occur/
are occurring at the facility.
(19) Detailed map showing the subject
facility on sheets not larger than 11x17
inches, drawn to scale, and with the
scale shown thereon. The map must
show, in clear relief, the exact location
of the facility on the rail line and its
relation to other rail lines in the area,
highways, water routes, population
centers, and any geographic features
that should be considered in
determining whether the facility would
pose an unreasonable risk to public
health, safety, or the environment,
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10909(c)(1).
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(20) Detailed drawing of the subject
facility on sheets not larger than 11x17
inches, drawn to scale, and with the
scale shown thereon. The drawing must
show, in clear relief, the exact
boundaries of the facility, structures at
the facility, the location and type of the
operations taking place at the facility,
the proposed traffic configuration for
the solid waste entering and leaving the
facility, reasonable future expansion
planned for the next 10 years that the
applicant requests to be included in the
land-use-exemption permit, any
geographic features that should be
considered in determining whether the
facility would pose an unreasonable risk
to public health, safety, or the
environment, pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
10909(c)(1), and any other information
that the applicant believes would be
relevant.
(21) A detailed justification for why
any future expansion planned for the
next 10 years should be covered by the
land-use-exemption permit.
(b) Statement. A statement that sets
forth, based on currently available
information, the reasons why the Board
should grant a land-use-exemption
permit to the applicant under the
standards in 49 U.S.C. 10909(c), (d) and
the regulations in this part. Specifically,
the applicant shall include an
explanation of whether the laws,
regulations, or other requirements
affecting siting of the facility from
which exemption is sought, on their
face or as applied, unreasonably burden
the interstate transportation of solid
waste by railroad or discriminate against
the railroad transportation of solid
waste and a solid waste rail transfer
facility, and, if so, why.
(c) Environmental impact. The
applicant shall certify that it has
submitted an Environmental and/or
Historic Report containing the
information in 49 CFR 1155.24(b),
1105.7, and 1105.8, to the extent
applicable, if an Environmental and/or
Historic Report is required. See 49 CFR
1155.20(c).
(d) Additional information. The
applicant shall submit such additional
information to support its application as
the Board may require.
(e) Draft Federal Register Notice.
The applicant shall submit a draft notice
of its application to be published by the
Board. In addition to the regular number
of copies that must be filed with the
Board, the applicant must submit a copy
of the draft notice as data contained on
a computer diskette compatible with the
Board’s current word processing
capabilities. The Board will publish the
notice in the Federal Register within 20
days of the application’s filing with the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
Board. The draft notice shall be in the
form set forth in Appendix B to this
part.
(f) Verification. The original
application shall be executed and
verified in the form set forth below by
an officer of the applicant having
knowledge of the facts and matters
relied upon.
69777
service shall be filed with the Board at
the same time.
(d)(1) Upon the filing of a land-useexemption-permit application, the
Board will review the application and
determine whether it conforms to all
applicable regulations. If the application
is substantially incomplete or is
otherwise defective, the Board shall
reject the application for stated reasons
Verification
by order within 20 days from the date
State of llll ss.
of filing of the application. If the Board
County of llll
does not reject the application, notice of
llllll (Name of affiant) makes the filing of the application shall be
oath and says that (s)he is the llll
published in the Federal Register by the
(title of affiant) of the llll (name of Board, through the Director of the Office
applicant) applicant herein; that (s)he
of Proceedings, within 20 days of the
has been authorized by the applicant (or filing of the application.
as appropriate, a court) to verify and file
(2) If the application is rejected, a
with the Surface Transportation Board
revised application may be submitted
the foregoing application in Finance
and the Board will determine whether
Docket No. ll (Sub-No. ll); that
the resubmitted application conforms
(s)he has carefully examined all of the
with all prescribed regulations. A
statements in the application as well as
properly revised application submitted
the exhibits attached thereto and made
within 60 days of the order rejecting the
a part thereof; that (s)he has knowledge
incomplete or improper application
of the facts and matters relied upon in
need not be subject to new notice and
the application; and that all
publication under § 1155.20, unless the
representations set forth therein are true defect causing the rejection was in the
and correct to the best of his/her
notice and/or publication. A revised
knowledge, information, and belief.
application submitted after such 60-day
period must be newly published and
(Signature)
noticed.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
(3) The resubmission of a complete
llll in and for the State and County
and properly filed land-use-exemptionabove named, this ll day of ll,
permit application shall be considered a
20ll.
de novo filing for the purposes of
My commission expires llll
computation of the time periods
prescribed in the regulations contained
§ 1155.22 Filings and service of
application.
in this part.
(4) An applicant may seek waiver of
(a) The applicant shall tender with its
specific regulations listed in subpart C
application an affidavit attesting to its
of this part by filing a petition for
compliance with the notice
waiver with the Board. When the
requirements of 49 CFR 1155.20. The
petition is filed with the Board, the
affidavit shall include the dates of
applicant shall serve, by first-class mail,
service, posting, and newspaper
a copy on the Governor of the state
publication of the Notice of Intent.
(b) When the application is filed with where the facility is located; the
municipality, the state, and any relevant
the Board, the applicant shall serve
political subdivision of a state or federal
concurrently, by first-class mail, a copy
or state regional planning entity of the
on the Governor of the state where the
jurisdiction in which the solid waste
facility is located; the municipality, the
rail transfer facility is located or
state, and any relevant political
proposed to be located; and the
subdivision of a state or federal or state
appropriate managing government
regional planning entity of the
agencies responsible for the groups of
jurisdiction in which the solid waste
land listed in 49 U.S.C. 10909(c)(2). A
rail transfer facility is located or
copy of the certificate of service shall be
proposed to be located; and the
filed with the Board at the same time.
appropriate managing government
A decision by the Director of the Office
agencies responsible for the groups of
of Proceedings granting or denying a
land listed in 49 U.S.C. 10909(c)(2). A
copy of the certificate of service shall be waiver petition will be issued within 30
days of the date the petition is filed.
filed with the Board at the same time.
Appeals from the Director’s decision
(c) The applicant shall promptly
will be decided by the entire Board. If
furnish by first class mail a copy of the
waiver is not obtained prior to the filing
application to any interested person
of the application, the application may
proposing to file a comment upon
be subject to rejection.
request. A copy of the certificate of
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
69778
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1155.23 Participation in application
proceedings.
(a) Initial comments. Interested
persons may become parties to a landuse-exemption-permit proceeding by
filing initial comments with the Board
within 45 days of the filing of the
application. Comments should contain
the following information, as
appropriate:
(1) Name, address, and organizational
affiliation.
(2) A statement describing
commenter’s interest in the proceeding,
including information concerning any
organization or public interest it
represents.
(3) Reasons, in general, why
commenter supports or opposes the
application, taking into account the
standards for the Board’s review and
consideration set forth in 49 U.S.C.
10909(c), (d) and this part.
(4) Any rebuttal to the evidence and
argument submitted by applicant.
(b) Final comments. Interested
persons, including the applicant, within
30 days after the close of OEA’s
environmental review, may comment on
how the information developed during
OEA’s environmental review concerning
the considerations at 49 U.S.C.
10909(d)(1) through (5) should be
weighed with the remaining
transportation and other relevant
considerations at 49 U.S.C. 10909(d)(6)
through (7). The parties will have an
additional 15 days to respond to other
parties’ arguments. All pleadings shall
be limited to weighing the information
developed during OEA’s environmental
review with transportation and other
concerns, and should not be directed
towards the adequacy of OEA’s
environmental review. (Interested
persons may comment on the adequacy
of OEA’s environmental review during
the normal comment period for the EIS
as provided in 49 CFR 1105.10(a)(4). See
49 CFR 1155.24(a).) All comments
under this paragraph shall contain the
information required in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (2) of this section.
(c) Filing and service of comments
and replies (including evidence and
argument). (1) Initial comments shall be
filed with the Board (addressed to the
Chief, Section of Administration, Office
of Proceedings, Surface Transportation
Board, 395 E Street SW., Washington,
DC 20423) within 45 days of the filing
with the Board of a land-use-exemptionpermit application. An original and 10
copies of each comment shall be filed
with the Board. A copy of each
comment shall be served on applicant or
its representative at the time of filing
with the Board. Each filing shall contain
a certificate of service.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
(2) Final comments shall be filed and
served on all parties within 30 days of
the close of the environmental review.
An original and 10 copies of such
comments shall be filed with the Board.
A copy of each comment shall be served
on applicant or its representative at the
time of filing with the Board. Each filing
shall contain a certificate of service.
(3) Replies to final comments shall be
filed and served on all parties no later
than 45 days after the close of the
environmental review. An original and
10 copies of such replies shall be filed
with the Board. A copy of each reply to
comments shall be served on applicant
or its representative at the time of filing
with the Board. Each filing shall contain
a certificate of service.
§ 1155.24
Environmental review.
(a) A land-use-exemption permit
generally will require the preparation of
an EIS. OEA may reclassify the
environmental review requirements of
land-use-exemption proceedings on a
case-by-case basis, pursuant to 49 CFR
1105.6(d).
(b) An applicant for a land-useexemption permit must submit an
Environmental Report, at least 45 days
prior to filing a land-use-exemptionpermit application, containing the
information described at 49 CFR 1105.7
to the extent applicable to solid waste
rail transfer facilities. Applicants shall
concurrently file a Historic Report
containing the information at 49 CFR
1105.8 if applicable. The Environmental
Report must also contain a discussion of
the five factors for consideration listed
at 49 U.S.C. 10909(d)(1) through (5) and
address any associated environmental
impacts as they relate to the facility for
which a land-use-exemption permit is
sought.
(c) The Board strongly encourages
applicants to use third-party contractors
to assist OEA in preparing the
appropriate environmental
documentation in land-use-exemptionpermit proceedings. See 49 CFR
1105.10(d). The environmental
reporting requirements outlined above
that would otherwise apply are waived
if an applicant hires a third-party
contractor, OEA approves the scope of
the contractor’s work, and the contractor
works under OEA’s direct supervision.
See 49 CFR 1105.10(d). If an applicant
does not hire an independent thirdparty contractor, the Board may hire a
third-party contractor and charge the
costs for the contractor to the applicant.
See 49 U.S.C. 10909(h).
(d) The Board’s procedures set forth
in 49 CFR 1105.10 for implementation
of environmental laws are controlling
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
unless superseded by provisions in this
Part.
(e) An applicant for a land-useexemption permit must follow the
Board’s procedures at 49 CFR 1105.9 for
compliance with the Coastal Zone
Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1451
through 1465, if that act is applicable.
§ 1155.25 Transfer and termination of a
land-use-exemption permit.
(a) A land-use-exemption permit may
be transferred from a rail carrier to an
acquiring rail carrier without the need
for a new application for a land-useexemption permit if the rail line
associated with the solid waste rail
transfer facility is transferred to another
rail carrier or to an entity formed to
become a rail carrier pursuant to
authority granted by the Board under 49
U.S.C. 10901, 10902, or 11323. When
seeking Board authority under 49 U.S.C.
10901, 10902, or 11323, the applicant(s)
shall specifically advise the Board, the
municipality, the state, and any relevant
political subdivision of a state or federal
or state regional planning entity of the
jurisdiction in which the solid waste
rail transfer facility is located, of the
intended transfer. The Federal Register
notice concerning the acquisition shall
include a statement that a solid waste
rail transfer facility with a Board-issued
land-use-exemption permit is included
in the acquisition.
(b) When a carrier plans to cease
using a facility as a solid waste rail
transfer facility, or when a facility is
transferred to any party in any manner
other than that described in paragraph
(a) of this section, the entity that
received the land-use-exemption permit
must notify the Board, the municipality,
the state, and any relevant political
subdivision of a state or federal or state
regional planning entity of the
jurisdiction in which the solid waste
rail transfer facility is located, in writing
no later than 60 days prior to the
proposed cessation or transfer. Upon
receipt of that notice, the Board will
publish notice in the Federal Register
that the land-use-exemption permit will
be terminated on the 60th day unless
otherwise ordered by the Board.
§ 1155.26 Board determinations under 49
U.S.C. 10909.
(a) Schedule. (1) The schedule in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall
govern the process for Board
consideration and decisions in land-useexemption-permit application
proceedings from the time the
application is filed until the time of the
Board’s decision on the merits:
(2) At least 45 days prior to filing of
application—Environmental Report
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(and/or Historic Report, if applicable)
filed and environmental process
initiated pursuant to 49 CFR 1155.24.
Within 30 days prior to filing of
application—Notice of Intent filed with
the Board pursuant to the deadlines and
requirements described in 49 CFR
1155.20(b)(3).
(i) Day 0—Application filed.
(ii) Day 20—Due date for Notice of
Application to be published in the
Federal Register.
(iii) Day 45—Due date for initial
comments.
(iv) 30 days after the Final EIS (or
other final environmental
documentation) is issued by OEA—Due
date for final comments.
(v) 45 days after the Final EIS (or
other final environmental
documentation) is issued by OEA—Due
date for replies to final comments.
(3) A decision on the merits will be
due 90 days after a full record is
developed.
(b) Standard for review. (1) The Board
will issue a land-use-exemption permit
only if it determines that the facility at
the existing or proposed location would
not pose an unreasonable risk to public
health, safety, or the environment. In
deciding whether a solid waste rail
transfer facility that is or proposed to be
constructed or operated by or on behalf
of a rail carrier poses an unreasonable
risk to public health, safety, or the
environment, the Board shall weigh the
particular facility’s potential benefits to
and the adverse impacts on public
health, public safety, the environment,
interstate commerce, and transportation
of solid waste by rail.
(2) The Board will not grant a landuse-exemption permit for a solid waste
rail transfer facility proposed to be
located on land within any unit of or
land affiliated with the National Park
System, the National Wildlife Refuge
System, the National Wilderness
Preservation System, the National Trails
System, the National Wild and Scenic
Rivers System, a National Reserve, or a
National Monument.
(3) The Board will not grant a landuse-exemption permit for a solid waste
rail transfer facility proposed to be
located on land within any unit of or
land affiliated with lands referenced in
The Highlands Conservation Act, Public
Law No. 108–421, for which a state has
implemented a conservation
management plan, if operation of the
facility would be inconsistent with
restrictions placed on such land.
(4) The Board will reject an
application from a person who is not a
rail carrier, but is instead operating on
behalf of a rail carrier unless;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
(i) The applicant has sought
permission from the applicable state,
local, or municipal authority with
respect to some or all of the property in
the application and received an
unsatisfactory result affecting the siting
of the facility, or
(ii) The Governor of the state has
petitioned the Board to require the
facility to apply under subpart B of this
part.
(5) The Board will issue a land-useexemption permit to an applicant that
has received an unsatisfactory result
from a state, local or municipal
authority affecting the siting of the
facility only if it finds that the laws,
regulations, or other requirements affect
the siting of the facility, on their face or
as applied, either;
(i) Unreasonably burden the interstate
transportation of solid waste by railroad,
or
(ii) Discriminate against the railroad
transportation of solid waste and a solid
waste rail transfer facility.
(6) A land-use-exemption permit will
only exempt state, local, or municipal
laws, regulations, orders, other
requirements, or portions thereof,
affecting the siting of the solid waste rail
transfer facility.
(c) Considerations. As required by 49
U.S.C. 10909(d), the Board will consider
and give due weight to the following, as
applicable:
(1) The land-use, zoning, and siting
regulations or solid waste planning
requirements of the state or state
subdivision in which the facility is or
will be located that are applicable to
solid waste transfer facilities, including
those that are not owned or operated by
or on behalf of a rail carrier;
(2) The land-use, zoning, and siting
regulations or solid waste planning
requirements applicable to the property
where the solid waste rail transfer
facility is proposed to be located;
(3) Regional transportation planning
requirements developed pursuant to
federal and state law;
(4) Regional solid waste disposal
plans developed pursuant to federal or
state law;
(5) Any federal and state
environmental protection laws or
regulations applicable to the site;
(6) Any unreasonable burdens
imposed on the interstate transportation
of solid waste by railroad, or the
potential for discrimination against the
railroad transportation of solid waste, a
solid waste rail transfer facility, or a rail
carrier that owns or operates such a
facility; and
(7) Any other relevant factors, as
determined by the Board.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69779
(d) Permits. If the Board grants a landuse-exemption permit for a solid waste
rail transfer facility, such permit will
only exempt a facility from complying
with state laws, regulations, orders, or
other requirements affecting the siting of
the facility that are specified therein.
The permit will require compliance
with all other state laws, regulations,
orders, or other requirements not
otherwise expressly exempted in the
permit.
§ 1155.27 Petitions to modify, amend, or
revoke a land-use-exemption permit.
General rule. Petitions to modify,
amend, or revoke land-use-exemption
permits shall be decided in accordance
with the Board’s normal standard of
review for petitions to reopen
administratively final Board actions at
49 CFR 1115.4. The petition must
demonstrate material error, new
evidence, or substantially changed
circumstances that warrant the
requested action, and is subject to these
additional conditions:
(a) An entity that petitions for a
modification or amendment requesting
an expansion of federal preemption or
the facility’s operations or physical size
is subject to the notice and application
requirements in this subpart C. The
language of the notifications shall be
modified to note that the petition is for
a modification or amendment.
(b) The Board will approve or deny
petitions to modify, amend, or revoke a
land-use-exemption permit within 90
days after the full record for the petition
is developed.
Appendix A to Part 1155—Form Notice
of Intent To Apply
Docket No. FD ll(Sub-No. ll)
Notice of Intent to apply for a land-useexemption permit for a solid waste rail
transfer facility.
(Name of Applicant) gives notice that on or
about (insert date application will be filed
with the Board) it intends to file with the
Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20423, an application
for a land-use-exemption permit for a solid
waste rail transfer facility as defined in 49
U.S.C. 10908(e)(1)(H) and 49 CFR 1155.2.
The solid waste rail transfer facility, owned
by (name of owner), and operated by (name
of operator), is located at (full address, or, if
not available, provide city, state, and United
States Postal Service ZIP code). The solid
waste rail transfer facility is located on a
(name of rail carrier) line of railroad known
as llll at milepost llll between
(station name) at milepost llll and
(station name) at milepost llll.
The reason(s) for the proposed permit
application is (are) llll (explain briefly
and clearly the activities undertaken, or
proposed to be undertaken, by the applicant
at the solid waste rail transfer facility.
Describe the specific state and local laws,
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
69780
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
regulations, orders or other requirements
affecting siting from which the applicant
requests entire or partial exemption and any
action that the state, local, or municipal
authority has taken affecting the siting of the
facility. Also, if applicant is not the rail
carrier, provide the name of the rail carrier
that owns or operates the facility or has the
facility operated on its behalf.)
(Include this paragraph for facilities not in
existence on October 16, 2008). Applicant
certifies that, based on information in its
possession, the facility is not proposed to be
located on land within any unit of or land
affiliated with the National Park System, the
National Wildlife Refuge System, the
National Wilderness Preservation System, the
National Trails System, the National Wild
and Scenic Rivers System, a National
Reserve, or a National Monument. Applicant
further certifies that the facility is not
proposed to be located on lands referenced
in The Highlands Conservation Act, Public
Law 108–421, for which a state has
implemented a conservation management
plan (or, The facility is consistent with the
restrictions implemented by (state) under
The Highlands Conservation Act, Public Law
108–421, placed at its proposed location).
Any relevant documentation in the railroad’s
possession on these issues will be made
available promptly to those requesting it.
(For facilities already in existence on
October 16, 2008, address the extent to which
the facility is or is not located in any of these
types of lands, and to the extent that it is so
located address any relevant criteria, and so
certify.)
The application containing the information
set forth at 49 CFR 1155.21 will include the
applicant’s case for the granting of the landuse-exemption permit. Any interested
person, after the application is filed on
(insert date), may file with the Surface
Transportation Board initial comments
concerning the application within 45 days
after the application is filed.
The party’s initial comments should
contain that party’s initial arguments in
support or opposition based on the
information available at that point including
the following, as appropriate:
(1) Name, address, and organizational
affiliation.
(2) A statement describing commenter’s
interest in the proceeding, including
information concerning the organization or
public interest the commenter represents.
(3) Specific reasons why commenter
supports or opposes the application, taking
into account the standards for the Board’s
review and consideration provided in 49
U.S.C. 10909(c), (d), and the Board’s
regulations at 49 CFR 1155.27.
(4) If the applicant files under 49 CFR
1155.22, specific reasons why commenter
supports or opposes the Board’s accepting
the application.
(5) Any rebuttal of material submitted by
applicant.
The parties’ initial comments will be
considered by the Board in determining what
disposition to make of the application.
Parties seeking further information
concerning the filing of comments should
refer to 49 CFR 1155.24.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:08 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
Interested persons also will have the
opportunity to provide detailed comments
during the Board’s environmental review
under the National Environmental Policy
Act. 49 CFR 1105.10 and 49 CFR 1155.25.
Questions concerning the environmental
review process or potential environmental
issues may be directed to the Board’s Office
of Environmental Analysis (OEA). After the
close of the environmental review, interested
parties may file final comments on how the
information developed during the
environmental review should be weighed by
the Board in determining whether to grant
the requested land-use-exemption permit.
See 49 CFR part 1155 for details on these
processes.
All comments should indicate the
proceeding designation Docket No. FD ll
(Sub-No. ll). Initial comments must be
filed with the Chief, Section of
Administration, Office of Proceedings,
Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20423, no later than
(insert the date 45 days after the date
applicant intends to file its application). A
copy of each comment shall be served upon
the representative of the applicant (insert
name, address, and phone number). Except
as otherwise set forth in 49 CFR part 1155,
each document filed with the Board must be
served on all parties to the land-useexemption-permit proceeding. See 49 CFR
1104.12(a).
Persons seeking further information
concerning land-use-exemption-permit
procedures may contact the Surface
Transportation Board or refer to 49 U.S.C.
10908, 10909, and the full land-useexemption-permit regulations at 49 CFR part
1155.
A copy of the application will be available
for public inspection on or after (insert date
the land-use-exemption-permit application is
to be filed with Board) and will be available
on the Board’s Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov. The applicant shall furnish
a copy of the application to any interested
person proposing to file a comment, upon
request.
Appendix B to Part 1155—Form
Federal Register Notice
Docket No. FD ll (Sub-No. ll)
Notice of Application for a land-useexemption permit for a solid waste rail
transfer facility.
On (insert date application was filed with
the Board) (name of applicant) filed with the
Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20423, an application
for a land-use-exemption permit for a solid
waste rail transfer facility. The solid waste
rail transfer facility, owned by (name of
owner), and operated by (name of operator),
is located at (full address, or, if not available,
provide city, state, and United States Postal
Service ZIP code). The solid waste rail
transfer facility is located on a line of (name
of rail carrier) railroad known as llll at
milepost llll between (station name) at
milepost llll and (station name) at
milepost llll. The application explains
why applicant believes its request for a landuse-exemption permit should be granted.
(Include this paragraph for facilities not in
existence on October 16, 2008). The facility
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
is not proposed to be located on land within
any unit of or land affiliated with the
National Park System, the National Wildlife
Refuge System, the National Wilderness
Preservation System, the National Trails
System, the National Wild and Scenic Rivers
System, a National Reserve, or a National
Monument. The facility is not proposed to be
located on lands referenced in The Highlands
Conservation Act, Public Law No. 108–421,
for which a state has implemented a
conservation management plan (or, The
facility is consistent with the restrictions
implemented by (state) under The Highlands
Conservation Act, Public Law 108–421,
placed on its proposed location). Any
relevant documentation in the railroad’s
possession will be made available promptly
to those requesting it.
(For facilities already in existence on
October 16, 2008, address the extent to which
the facility is or is not located in any of these
types of lands, and to the extent that it is so
located address any relevant criteria, and so
certify.)
Any interested person may file with the
Surface Transportation Board initial
comments concerning the application within
45 days of the filing of the application.
Persons seeking information concerning the
filing of initial comments should refer to 49
CFR 1155.23.
All comments should indicate the
proceeding designation Finance Docket No.
ll (Sub-No. ll). Initial comments must
be filed with the Chief, Section of
Administration, Office of Proceedings,
Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20423, no later than
(insert the date 45 days after the date
applicant intends to file its application). A
copy of each comment shall be served upon
the representative of the applicant (insert
name, address, and phone number). Except
as otherwise set forth in 49 CFR part 1155,
each document filed with the Board must be
served on all parties to the land-useexemption-permit proceeding. 49 CFR
1104.12(a).
Persons seeking further information
concerning land-use-exemption-permit
procedures may contact the Surface
Transportation Board or refer to 49 U.S.C.
10908, 10909, 10910, and the Board’s
implementing land-use-exemption-permit
regulations at 49 CFR part 1155.
A copy of the application is available for
public inspection. The applicant shall
furnish a copy of the application to any
interested person proposing to file a
comment, upon request.
Questions concerning the environmental
review process or potential environmental
issues may be directed to the Board’s Office
of Environmental Analysis (OEA). After the
close of the environmental review, interested
parties may file final comments on how the
information developed during the
environmental review should be weighed by
the Board in determining whether to grant
the requested land-use-exemption permit.
See 49 CFR part 1155 for details on these
processes.
[FR Doc. 2012–28196 Filed 11–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 21, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69769-69780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28196]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
49 CFR Part 1155
[Docket No. EP 684]
Solid Waste Rail Transfer Facilities
AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.
ACTION: Final rules.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These final rules govern land-use-exemption permits for solid
waste rail transfer facilities. The Clean Railroads Act of 2008 amended
the U.S. Code to restrict the jurisdiction of the Surface
Transportation Board over solid waste rail transfer facilities. The Act
also added three new statutory provisions that address the Board's
regulation of such facilities, which is now limited to issuance of
``land-use-exemption permits'' in certain circumstances. In 2009, as
required by the Act, the Board issued interim rules. In 2011, based on
the comments received and further evaluation, the Board revised the
2009 Rules and sought comments on the changes. After further evaluation
and review of the comments received on the 2011 Rules, the Board now
adopts the 2011 Rules as final rules with minor modification.
DATES: These rules will be effective on December 21, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lucille Marvin, The Office of Public
Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance, (202) 245-0238.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean Railroads Act of 2008, Public Law
110-432, 122 Stat. 4848, (CRA) amended 49 U.S.C. 10501(c)(2) to
restrict the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board (Board or
STB) over solid waste rail transfer facilities. The CRA also added
three new statutory provisions--49 U.S.C. 10908-10910--that address the
Board's regulation of such facilities, which is now limited to issuance
of ``land-use-exemption permits'' in certain circumstances. Under the
CRA, a solid waste rail transfer facility must comply with all
applicable federal and state requirements respecting the prevention and
abatement of pollution, the protection and restoration of the
environment, and the protection of public health and safety, in the
same manner as any similar solid waste management facility not owned or
operated by or on behalf of a rail carrier, except for laws affecting
the siting of the facility that are covered by the land-use-exemption
permit. As required by the CRA, the Board issued interim rules in a
decision served January 14, 2009. Solid Waste Rail Transfer Facilities
(2009 Decision), EP 684 (STB served Jan. 14, 2009). Those interim rules
were published in the Federal Register on January 27, 2009 (74 FR 4714)
(2009 Rules). Based on the comments received and further evaluation,
the Board served a decision on March 11, 2011, which revised the 2009
Rules and sought comments on the changes. Solid Waste Rail Transfer
Facilities (2011 Decision), EP 684 (STB served Mar. 11, 2011). The
revised interim rules were published in the Federal Register on March
24, 2011 (76 FR 16538) (2011 Rules). After further evaluation and
review of the comments received on the 2011 Rules, the Board now adopts
the 2011 Rules as final rules with minor modifications. The final rules
are set forth below.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10501(a), the Board has jurisdiction over
``transportation by rail carrier.'' Section 10501(b), as modified by
the ICC Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA), Public Law 104-88, 109 Stat.
803 (1995), provides that both ``[t]he jurisdiction of the Board over
transportation by rail carriers'' (which includes the carriers' rail
facilities, see 49 U.S.C. 10102(9)), and ``the remedies provided under
[49 U.S.C. 10101-11908]'' are ``exclusive,'' and ``preempt the remedies
provided under Federal or State law.'' Prior to enactment of the CRA,
the Board's preemptive jurisdiction extended to solid waste rail
transfer facilities owned or operated by rail carriers. Accordingly,
state permitting or preclearance requirements (including environmental,
zoning, and often land-use requirements) that, by their nature, could
be used to deny a railroad the right to conduct its operations or
proceed with transportation activities at rail transfer facilities,
including solid waste rail transfer facilities, as authorized by the
Board, were preempted. See 49 U.S.C. 10501(b); N.Y. Susquehanna & W.
Ry. v. Jackson, 500 F.3d 238, 252-55 (3d Cir. 2007); Green Mountain
R.R. v. Vermont, 404 F.3d 638, 641-43 (2d Cir. 2005). Other state
actions related to these facilities were preempted if, as applied, they
would have the effect of unreasonably burdening or interfering with
transportation by rail carrier. See N.Y. Susquehanna, 500 F.3d at 252;
Green Mountain, 404 F.3d at 643.
The CRA modified the Board's jurisdiction over solid waste rail
transfer facilities. The CRA provides that solid waste rail transfer
facilities, as defined in 49 U.S.C. 10908(e)(1)(H), must now
[[Page 69770]]
comply with all applicable Federal and state requirements (including
environmental requirements) that apply to similar solid waste
management facilities that are not owned or operated by or on behalf of
a rail carrier, except as otherwise provided in the CRA.\1\ The CRA
gives the Board the authority, if petitioned, to issue land-use-
exemption permits that preempt state and local laws and regulations
``affecting the siting'' of such facilities (except to the extent that
the Board requires the facility to comply with such provisions). 49
U.S.C. 10909(f).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The CRA does not affect the Board's jurisdiction, or the
scope of Federal preemption, over a rail carrier's transportation-
related activities involving commodities other than solid waste. 49
U.S.C. 10908(d).
\2\ The 2009 Decision and the 2011 Decision contain further
discussion of the CRA and the Board's initial and subsequent
implementation of the legislation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Final Rules
The Board received comments on the 2011 Rules.\3\ We now adopt
final rules based on suggestions made in the parties' comments and on
the Board's review of the revised interim regulations. We address the
comments received on the 2011 Rules and our revisions made in response
to the comments below. The final rules are in full below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Board received comments and replies from the following:
Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTEP); National
Solid Wastes Management Association, et al. (NSWMA); Association of
American Railroads (AAR); Atlantic County Utilities Authority
(ACUA); New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and New
Jersey Meadowlands Commission (collectively, NJDEP); and the
Township of Bensalem, Bucks County, Pennsylvania (Bensalem).
Additionally, after the deadline for initial comments, the Board
received comments from the Rhode Island Resource Recovery
Corporation (RIRRC). As no party would be prejudiced, we will accept
this late filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Notice
In the 2011 Decision, slip op. at 7-8, the Board concluded that an
EIS generally should be prepared for each land-use-exemption-permit
application. NSWMA argues that, consequently, the Board should add
separate environmental notice procedures to the CRA rules to allow for
full public participation during the early stages of the Board's
environmental review, including ``scoping''--the process that
determines the issues to be addressed in an EIS.\4\ NSWMA points out
that 49 CFR 1105.10(a) of the Board's environmental rules requires an
applicant for a Board action that warrants an EIS to give the Board's
Office of Environmental Analysis (OEA) six months' notice prior to
filing its application, but does not require the applicant to serve the
notice on affected state and local agencies or otherwise publish it.\5\
NSWMA is concerned that, unless state and local officials are served
with the Sec. 1105.10(a) notice when it is filed at the Board, these
public officials will lose the opportunity to participate meaningfully
in ``key EIS scoping proceedings'' for projects seeking land-use-
exemption permits.\6\ NSWMA contrasts the absence of advance
environmental notice in the interim and revised interim CRA rules with
the advance notice that the Board requires for applications for a land-
use-exemption permit.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ NSWMA's Comments 2-4; CTEP's Comments 1 (adopting NSWMA's
comments).
\5\ We note that the 6-month prefiling requirement that NSWMA
relies on is frequently waived. See 49 CFR 1105.10(c)(2); see, e.g.,
Tongue River R.R.--Rail Construction & Operation--In Custer, Powder
River & Rosebud Cntys., Mont., FD 30186, letter from Victoria
Rutson, Director, Office of Environmental Analysis (Oct. 18, 2012);
R.J. Corman R.R.--Construction & Operation Exemption--In Clearfield
Cnty., Pa., FD 35116, letter from Victoria Rutson, Director, Office
of Environmental Analysis (Jan. 24, 2008). As a practical matter,
many applicants do not have their projects adequately developed to
allow the environmental review to begin months in advance of the
filing of an application.
\6\ NSWMA's Comments 3.
\7\ Pursuant to 49 CFR 1155.20(a)(2) and 1155.22(b) of the 2011
Rules, the Notice of Intent and Application must each be served on
the governor, municipality, state, and any relevant Federal or state
regional planning entity where the facility is located. The Notice
of Intent must also be published at least once during each of three
consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the
county in which the facility is located. 49 CFR 1155.20(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We reject NSWMA's assertion that the Board's procedures do not give
regional, state or local officials a meaningful opportunity to
participate at the early stages of the EIS process and that additional
notice is necessary. The Board's existing procedures provide that
consultation letters are sent by the Board to potentially interested or
affected Federal, state, and local agencies, soliciting their comments
on possible environmental impacts, prior to publication of a Notice of
Intent to Prepare an EIS. See Policy Statement on Use of Third-Party
Contracting in Preparation of Envtl. Documentation, 5 S.T.B. 467
(2001); see also 40 CFR 1501.2(d)(2). Thus, the Board's existing
procedures give public officials the opportunity for early input into
the process of developing the scope of the Draft EIS. But the
opportunity for early participation in the environmental review process
does not stop there. The Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS, which
includes a description of the proposed action and provides a period for
written comments on the draft scope of the EIS, is then published in
the Federal Register and served. 49 CFR 1105.10(a)(2). The scoping
process also typically includes a meeting in the project area that
gives state and local officials and members of the public an
opportunity to be heard. The Board issues a final scope of study for
the EIS only after considering the scoping comments.\8\ Therefore, we
find that no additional notice is necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Opportunities for public input on environmental issues
continue throughout the duration of the proceeding. Following
scoping, the Board prepares a Draft EIS, which is made available for
review and comment by the public, government agencies, and other
interested parties (typically for 45 days). Thereafter, a Final EIS
is issued that considers comments on the Draft EIS, sets forth any
additional analyses, and makes final environmental recommendations
for the Board to consider in reaching its final decision. Finally,
our CRA procedures specifically allow for final public comments
following the conclusion of the environmental review on how the
information developed during the environmental review should be
weighed with transportation and other concerns. 49 CFR 1155.23(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NSWMA also is concerned that state and local officials and the
public will not receive notice of requests submitted by applicants to
OEA seeking to reclassify the requirement that an EIS be prepared in
particular cases under 49 CFR 1155.24(a) \9\ and 1105.6(d) because such
requests are not published in the Federal Register.\10\ We do not
believe that Federal Register publication is necessary. Section
1105.6(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations has been in effect since
1991. See Implementation of Envtl. Laws, EP 55 (Sub-No. 22A) (ICC
served July 31, 1991); 56 FR 36104 (July 31, 1991). In recent years,
OEA has received a number of reclassification requests. For example,
rail construction cases normally require preparation of an EIS.
Nevertheless, in certain rail construction cases where there is little
potential for significant environmental impacts, applicants have
requested that OEA reclassify the level of environmental review to
allow for the preparation of a more limited Environmental Assessment
rather than an EIS. Until now, however, we have not received any
suggestions that
[[Page 69771]]
Federal Register publication is needed to provide adequate notice of a
request to reclassify the level of environmental review for a proposed
action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ We note that, contrary to AAR's assertion in its reply
brief, a written request to reclassify pursuant to Sec. Sec.
1155.24(a) and 1105.6(d) is distinct from a petition for waiver
pursuant to Sec. 1155.22(d)(4). (See AAR's Reply Comments 9 n.5.) A
petition for waiver of regulations pertaining to applications for
land-use-exemption permits must be issued by the Director of the
Office of Proceedings. 49 CFR 1155.22(d)(4). Requests to reclassify
the environmental review requirements must be decided by the
Director of OEA. 49 CFR 1155.24(a) (``OEA may reclassify the
environmental review requirements * * *, pursuant to 49 CFR
1105.6(d).''); 49 CFR 1105.2 (``The [Director] of [OEA] * * * is
delegated the authority * * * to render initial decisions on
requests for waiver or modification of any of these rules for
individual proceedings * * * .'').
\10\ NSWMA's Comments 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our CRA rules are designed to give interested state and local
officials and the public the ability to protect their interest in
having the Board conduct an appropriate level of environmental review
of applications for land use exemption permits. Sections 1155.20(a)(2)
and 1155.22(b) will provide for notice to agencies and interested
persons in the project area that an application for a particular land
use exemption permit is to be filed. Once a case is docketed at the
Board, interested persons and agencies can keep track of the status of
the case, including requests to reclassify the level of environmental
review and any responses, by checking the Board's Web site. Moreover,
state and local environmental officials are likely to have advance
notice of proposed solid waste rail transfer facilities because these
facilities would have to comply with the same applicable Federal and
state requirements as non-rail solid waste management facilities,
except for laws affecting siting that are covered by the application
for a land-use-exemption permit. Finally, even if a request for
reclassification of the EIS requirement is granted, state and local
officials and the public have numerous opportunities during the
environmental review process to argue to the Board that the
environmental impacts of the project will be significant enough to
require the preparation of an EIS. See supra n.8. When information
emerges during the environmental review process to indicate that a
proposed action could result in potentially significant environmental
impacts, the Board will heighten the level of environmental review as
appropriate. See Norfolk S. Ry.--Joint Control & Operating/Pooling
Agreements--Pan Am S., LLC, FD 35147 et al., slip op. at 2-3 (STB
served Sept. 25, 2008) (suspending procedural schedule to prepare an
Environmental Assessment in case where it had been originally
determined that no environmental review was necessary).
B. EIS Requirements
NJDEP argues that 49 CFR 1155.21(c) does not reflect the Board's
determination in 49 CFR 1155.24(a) that an EIS generally should be
prepared for each land-use-exemption-permit application.\11\ Section
1155.21(c) states that an ``applicant shall certify that it has
submitted an Environmental and/or Historic Report * * * if an
Environmental and/or Historic Report is required.'' 49 CFR
1155.21(c).\12\ NJDEP asks that the Board remove the clause ``if an
Environmental and/or Historic Report is required'' from this section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ NJDEP's Comments 3.
\12\ We have made minor editorial changes to the 2011 Rules,
including capitalizing ``Environmental Report'' and ``Historic
Report'' consistently throughout.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be inappropriate to grant NJDEP's request. As the Board
specifically stated in the 2011 Decision, slip op. at 25-26 (citing 49
CFR 1105.10(d)), applicants need not file Environmental and/or Historic
Reports describing the potential environmental impacts of their
proposals if third-party contractors are used to assist the
environmental staff in preparing the Board's environmental
documentation, which generally will be an EIS. Thus, the 2011 Rules
properly made clear that, even when a third-party contractor is used
and Environmental and/or Historic Reports are not required from the
applicant, the Board can still prepare an EIS.
NJDEP also argues that the clause in Sec. 1155.21(c) stating ``if
an Environmental and/or Historic Report is required'' conflicts with 49
CFR 1155.20(c). The latter section states that ``[a]pplicant must also
submit an Environmental and/or Historic Report containing the
information described at 49 CFR 1155.[24](b),\13\ 1105.7, and 1105.8,
to the extent applicable, at least 45 days prior to filing an
application.'' \14\ Although Sec. 1155.20(c) does not include the
language ``if an Environmental and/or Historic Report is required,'' it
does specifically acknowledge later in that section that the
``reporting requirements that would otherwise apply are waived * * * if
the applicant or the Board hires a third-party consultant.'' Thus,
there is no conflict between the two sections. Nevertheless, for
clarity, we will add a reference in Sec. 1155.21(c) to Sec.
1155.20(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The 2011 Rules inadvertently cited to 49 CFR 1155.25(b)
rather than 49 CFR 1155.24(b). We have revised the final rules to
cite the correct regulation. See infra note 31 and accompanying
text.
\14\ In response to several comments on the 2009 Rules, the
Board noted in the 2011 Decision that, although 49 CFR 1105.7 does
not address issues specific to solid waste management, much of the
information in the environmental reporting rules does apply to solid
waste rail transfer facilities. Thus, the Board concluded that it
would ``continue to require applicants to comply with the
environmental reporting requirements in 49 CFR 1105.7 to the extent
applicable.'' 2011 Decision, slip op. at 25. Several provisions of
these rules also contain the proviso that Environmental Reports
should contain the information described at Sec. 1105.7, to the
extent applicable. 49 CFR 1155.20(c), 1155.24(b). We have revised
Sec. 1155.21(c) to add ``to the extent applicable'' to comport with
Sec. 1155.20(c), Sec. 1155.24(b) and our discussion in the 2011
Decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Interpretation of 49 U.S.C. 10910
In the 2011 Decision, the Board added a procedural requirement that
applicants and interested parties state whether the law affecting
siting from which exemption is sought is an environmental, public
health, or public safety standard that falls under the traditional
police powers of the state, and if not, to explain why not. 2011
Decision, slip op. at 5; 49 CFR 1155.21(a)(7). The Board reasoned that
this information was necessary because of 49 U.S.C. 10910 and the
Board's standard for review in revised 49 CFR 1155.26(b)(6),\15\ and
stated that, if a law affecting siting is covered by 49 U.S.C. 10910,
the Board will not issue a land-use-exemption permit unless the
applicant has shown that compliance with that law meets the
unreasonable burden or discrimination test. 2011 Decision, slip op. at
5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Section 1155.26(b)(6) of the 2011 Rules, which was also
located in the Board's 2009 Rules at 49 CFR 1155.27(b)(4), states
that ``[a] land-use-exemption permit will not exempt a state
requirement that a rail carrier comply with an environmental, public
health, or public safety standard that falls under the traditional
police powers of the state unless the requirement is unreasonably
burdensome to interstate commerce or discriminates against rail
carriers.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The procedural requirement in Sec. 1155.21(a)(7), and the Board's
substantive standard of review found at Sec. 1155.26(b)(6), were based
on the Board's interpretation of Sec. 10910, which provides that
``[n]othing in section 10908 or 10909 is intended to affect the
traditional police powers of the State to require a rail carrier to
comply with State and local environmental, public health, and public
safety standards that are not unreasonably burdensome and do not
discriminate against rail carriers.'' When the 2009 Rules and 2011
Rules were issued, the Board read Sec. 10910 as confirming judicial
and Board precedent establishing that, notwithstanding the express
Federal preemption in 49 U.S.C. 10501(b), state and local bodies
nonetheless retain police powers to protect the public health and
safety, so long as the state and local regulations do not serve to
regulate railroad operations or unreasonably interfere with interstate
commerce. E.g., N.Y. Susquehanna, 500 F.3d at 252-55; Green Mountain,
404 F.3d at 643. Consistent with this precedent, the Board,
notwithstanding the separate express preemption provisions of Sec.
10909, interpreted the CRA as preserving the state's historic police
powers to protect public health and safety where the law in question
does not unreasonably burden interstate
[[Page 69772]]
commerce or discriminate against rail transportation.
AAR, however, argues that the Board misinterpreted 49 U.S.C. 10910
and that the Board can issue a land-use-exemption permit under section
10909 even if the law affecting siting falls under the state's
traditional police powers and the requirement does not unreasonably
burden interstate commerce or discriminate against rail carriers.\16\
AAR points to the balancing of interests contemplated by section
10909(c) and (d), which, it claims, suggests that no single factor,
such as the absence of an undue burden on interstate commerce, requires
denial of a land-use-exemption permit. It further argues that section
10909(f) provides the Board with express authority to preempt ``all''
state laws affecting siting of a solid waste rail transfer facility,
including those that might otherwise fall under the traditional police
powers of the state. Arguing that the specific provisions of Sec.
10909 dictate the proper interpretation of section 10910, AAR believes
that section 10910 should be read to state that ``[Other than with
respect to state laws and requirements affecting siting, n]othing in
section 10908 or 10909 is intended to affect the traditional police
powers of the State to require a rail carrier to comply with State and
local environmental, public health, and public safety standards that
are not unreasonably burdensome and do not discriminate against rail
carriers.'' \17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ AAR also claims that our interpretation of section 10910 in
the 2011 Decision conflicts with our interpretation of that section
in the 2009 Decision. (AAR's Comments 4.) Given our decision here,
there is no need to address this argument.
\17\ AAR's Comments 6 n.5, 20 n.12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We find that both AAR's interpretation of section 10910 and the one
originally adopted by the Board are plausible readings of the statute.
The statute is ambiguous, and the Board has struggled to interpret a
number of its provisions, including section 10910. At this juncture,
however, we need not resolve the statutory ambiguity by definitively
choosing one interpretation of section 10910 over the other. We do not
need to interpret section 10910 definitively in order to effectively
carry out the intent of Congress in the CRA. As AAR acknowledges, the
Board has the discretion not to preempt a law affecting siting.\18\
Therefore, the difficult question regarding the preemptive effect of
section 10910 would only arise in the event that an applicant for a
land-use-exemption permit were to make a persuasive case that the Board
should preempt a law affecting siting promulgated under the state's
traditional police powers that does not impose an unreasonable burden
on interstate commerce and was not being used to discriminate against a
rail carrier. We cannot predict whether this scenario will come before
the Board. Should the situation described above arise in the future,
the Board will, as appropriate, examine the meaning of section 10910 in
the context of that specific factual dispute and the particular state
law in question. Accordingly, we will remove interim rule Sec.
1155.26(b)(6) from our final rules.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ AAR's Comments 6 n.5 (citing 49 U.S.C. 10909(f) (``An
exemption may require compliance with such State laws, regulations,
orders, or other requirements.'')).
\19\ Former Sec. 1155.26(b)(7) is now renumbered as Sec.
1155.26(b)(6) in the final rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the procedural requirement in Sec. 1155.21(a)(7)
of our interim rules, the information requested in that rule would
assist the Board in deciding whether to issue a land-use-exemption
permit. The CRA specifically permits the Board to ``consider and give
due weight to'' six enumerated factors, as well as ``any other relevant
factors, as determined by the Board.'' 49 U.S.C. 10909(d). Although AAR
disagreed with the statutory interpretation of section 10910 in the
2011 Decision, it did not specifically object to the imposition of a
procedural requirement requesting information on whether the law from
which exemption is sought is a public health or safety standard that
falls under the traditional police powers of the state. In fact, AAR
acknowledged that the extent of the burden placed on interstate
commerce, and whether the law discriminates against rail carriers, are
factors in deciding whether to issue a preemptive land-use-exemption
permit.\20\ We will thus continue to require the information requested
in 49 CFR 1155.21(a)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ AAR's Comments 14-15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Effect of Land-Use-Exemption Permit
NJDEP believes that 49 CFR 1155.26(d) of the 2011 Rules does not
reflect the Board's intent. Specifically, NJDEP points to the Board's
statement in the 2011 Decision that ``[u]ltimately, a land-use-
exemption permit would only exempt a facility from complying with laws,
regulations, and orders affecting the siting that are specified in the
permit. The Board will require the applicant to comply with all other
laws, regulations, orders, or other requirements affecting the siting
of a facility.'' 2011 Decision, slip op. at 5. NJDEP argues that this
statement conflicts with Sec. 1155.26(d) of our 2011 Rules, which
states in relevant part that ``a Board-issued land-use-exemption permit
will require compliance with such state laws, regulations, orders, or
other requirements not otherwise expressly exempted in the permit
unless the Board determines otherwise.'' 49 CFR 1155.26(d). NJDEP
believes that the qualifier at the end of this section should be
removed. We agree that the language of this section does not reflect
the fact that a land-use-exemption permit will exempt only those laws
specified in the permit, and will reword that section in order to
clarify the effect of a permit. Section 1155.26(d) will now state as
follows: ``If the Board grants a land-use-exemption permit for a solid
waste rail transfer facility, such permit would only exempt a facility
from complying with state laws, regulations, orders, or other
requirements affecting the siting of a facility that are specified
therein. The permit will require compliance with all other state laws,
regulations, orders, or other requirements not otherwise expressly
exempted in the permit.''
E. The Process To Come Before the Board
CTEP and NSWMA request that the Board require, as a prerequisite,
that an applicant seek state or local approval under the challenged
laws and rules before they can be included on the list to be preempted
under 49 CFR 1155.21(7), unless it is ineffective or demonstrably
futile to do so.\21\ This request was also adopted by ACUA, Bensalem,
and RIRRC.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ CTEP's Comments 1; NSWMA's Comments 4.
\22\ ACUA's Comments 1; Bensalem's Comments 1; RIRRC's Comments
1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the Board previously explained in the 2011 Decision, slip op. at
10, this suggestion conflicts with the language of the CRA, which
explains that a rail carrier that owns or operates a facility may come
before the Board prior to seeking a siting determination from the
state. See 49 U.S.C. 10909(a)(1). Thus, we will not adopt the proposed
change.
F. Definition of ``State Requirements''
ACUA notes that, pursuant to 49 CFR 1155.2(e), ``[s]tate
requirements * * * does not include the laws, regulations, ordinances,
orders, or other requirements of a political subdivision of a state,
including a locality or municipality, unless a state expressly
delegates such authority to such political subdivision.'' \23\ ACUA
states that ``it should be noted that in New Jersey, and perhaps other
states, delegation of state authority may be to
[[Page 69773]]
an entity other than a `locality or municipality' and that a utility
authority may * * * constitute a political subdivision.'' \24\ Section
1155.2(e) mirrors the language of 49 U.S.C. 10908(e)(3), the plain
language of which indicates that a political subdivision of a state
includes a locality or municipality, but may also include other
entities. We will continue to follow the language of the statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ ACUA's Comments 1.
\24\ ACUA's Comments 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACUA also states that ``entities such as County Utilities
Authorities in New Jersey which have been designated as the
implementation agency for the State Solid Waste Management Plan should
be entitled to notice at each level of the process.'' \25\ In response
to the comment, we will broaden the list of entities that are required
to receive service of applications for land-use-exemption permits and
related Notices of Intent to include any agency designated as the
implementation agency for the solid waste management plan of the state
in which the solid waste rail transfer facility is located or proposed
to be located. We have adjusted 49 CFR 1155.20(a)(2)(ii), 1155.22(b),
1155.22(d)(4), 1155.25(a), and 1155.25(b) accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ ACUA's Comments 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
G. Other Comments
AAR suggests that we add language to 49 CFR 1155.2(a)(10)(ii)(B).
Specifically, AAR argues that instead of stating ``a facility where
solid waste is transferred or transloaded solely from a tank truck
directly to a rail tank car,'', that section should read ``to or from a
tank truck directly to a rail tank car,''.\26\ The language of that
section, however, mirrors the language of 49 U.S.C.
10908(e)(1)(H)(ii)(II).\27\ We will continue to follow the language of
the statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ AAR's Comments 20.
\27\ Section 1155.2(a)(10)(ii)(B) of the 2011 Rules erroneously
quoted the CRA with respect to the word ``solely.'' We are
correcting that here so that the final rule mirrors the CRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AAR also proposes that we modify the language of 49 CFR 1155.20(a)
and 1155.22(a) so that an applicant need not file a Notice of Intent if
it is required to submit an application due to a governor's petition
pursuant to 49 CFR 1155.13. AAR argues that the petition would provide
sufficient notice of intent.\28\ As such, AAR requests that the Board
revise the language of Sec. 1155.20(a) to ``Except where an
application is required by Subpart B, [a]n applicant * * * shall give
its Notice of Intent to file a land-use-exemption-permit application by
complying with the following procedures * * * .'' Similarly, AAR
requests that the Board revise the language of Sec. 1155.22(a) to
``Except where an application is required by Subpart B, [t]he applicant
shall tender with its application an affidavit attesting to its
compliance with the notice requirements of 49 CFR 1155.20.'' We decline
to adopt AAR's proposed changes. We believe that all applicants,
including those who are required to file an application pursuant to a
governor's petition, should comply with the application procedures,
including the Notice of Intent provisions, provided in Subpart C. A
Notice of Intent under Subpart C provides broader notice than a
petition under Subpart B,\29\ and it also serves to notify the Board
and all parties that the application process is commencing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ AAR's Comments 20.
\29\ Under Subpart C, 49 CFR 1155.20 provides that an applicant
shall serve its Notice of Intent on the Board; the governor of the
state where the facility is located; the municipality, state, and
any relevant political subdivision of a state or federal or state
regional planning entity in the jurisdiction of which the facility
is located; and the appropriate managing government agencies
responsible for the groups of land listed in 49 U.S.C. 10909(c)(2).
Additionally, the applicant must publish its Notice of Intent at
least once during each of three consecutive weeks in a newspaper of
general circulation in each county in which any part of the facility
is located. By contrast, under Subpart B, 49 CFR 1155.11 provides
that a petition filed by the governor be filed with the Board;
served on the rail carrier that owns or operates the facility; and
served on the facility, if its address is different than that of the
rail carrier's.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AAR also notes that the schedule in 49 CFR 1155.26(a)(2) omits the
deadlines for the Notice of Intent.\30\ We will add language to Sec.
1155.26(a)(2) to account for the deadlines for the Notice of Intent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ AAR's Comments 21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both AAR and NJDEP accurately note that certain references in the
revised interim rules to 49 CFR 1155.25 are in error.\31\ Section
1155.21(c) should read ``[t]he applicant shall certify that it has
submitted an Environmental and/or Historic Report containing the
information in 49 CFR 1155.24(b), 1105.7, and 1105.8 * * * .''
Similarly, the first sentence of Sec. 1155.20(c) has been revised to
read ``[a]pplicant must also submit an Environmental and/or Historic
Report containing the information described at 49 CFR 1155.24(b),
1105.7, and 1105.8 * * * .'' Finally, the citation at the end of Sec.
1155.20(c) has been changed to 49 CFR 1155.24(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ AAR's Comments 20; NJDEP's Comments 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACUA poses a question regarding 49 CFR 1155.12(b), which pertains
to facilities which were in existence on October 16, 2008, but have
since ceased operations. Assuming a facility can prove it was operating
as a solid waste rail transfer facility on October 16, 2008, and has
since ceased operations, ACUA wonders whether Sec. 1155.12(b) would
render the facility, should it seek to restore operations, subject to
review as a proposed facility. ACUA also asks under what circumstances,
if any, a facility which ``no longer operates as such'' may allege
continuous operations to maintain its exemption. We will not address
those issues in this proceeding because the answers would depend on the
factual circumstances of the particular case.
Paperwork Reduction, Regulatory Flexibility, and Environmental
Certifications
In the 2011 Decision, published in the Federal Register at 76 FR
16538 on March 24, 2011, the Board sought comments pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501-3549, and Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) regulations at 5 CFR 1320.11, regarding:
(1) Whether the collection of information associated with the land-use-
exemption permit application is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Board, including whether the collection has
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the Board's burden estimates;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, when appropriate. No comments related to these questions
were received.
The proposed rules were submitted to OMB for review as required
under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), and 5 CFR 1320.11. No comments were
received from OMB, which approved the collection, titled ``Applications
for Land-Use-Exemption Permits,'' and assigned it Control No. 2140-
0018. Unless renewed, OMB approval expires June 30, 2014. The display
of a currently valid OMB control number for this collection is required
by law. Under the PRA and 5 CFR 1320.11, an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless the collection displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act at 5 U.S.C.
605(b), we certify that the final rules will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The basis
for this determination is as follows. While applicants for land-use-
exemption permits could be small entities, as defined in 13 CFR part
121,
[[Page 69774]]
under neither the statute nor the final rules could the Board, on its
own, require a party to apply for a Board permit. See 49 U.S.C.
10908(b)(2)(B), 10909(a). In general, that decision is solely within
the control of the entity. The one exception is that a governor of the
state in which an existing facility is located could petition the
Board, under 49 U.S.C. 10908(b)(2)(B) and 49 CFR part 1155 subpart B,
to require that facility to obtain a land-use-exemption permit in order
for it to continue to operate. Even in that circumstance, the authority
lies with the state governors--not the Board--to initiate the Board's
processes. In all other scenarios, a party can avoid being subject to
the Board's rules regarding land-use-exemption permits by complying
with state requirements. Therefore, the final rules will not
circumscribe or mandate the conduct of a substantial number of small
entities.
Moreover, any burdens imposed on small entities come from the plain
language of the CRA and the requirements that Congress has imposed on
this agency. In revising our 2009 Rules and 2011 Rules, we have
attempted to simplify the process wherever possible. Finally, we have
provided a waiver provision that could mitigate any negative impacts on
small entities. Our rules specifically provide that an applicant may
request a waiver of any particular part of the application procedures.
See 49 CFR 1155.22(d)(4).
This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
It is ordered:
1. The rules set forth below are adopted as final rules.
2. Notice of this decision will be published in the Federal
Register. The final rules will be effective on December 21, 2012.
3. A copy of this decision will be served upon the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy, Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 1155
Administrative practice and procedure.
Decided: November 14, 2012.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and
Commissioner Begeman.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Surface
Transportation Board revises part 1155 of title 49, chapter X, of the
Code of Federal Regulations to read as follows:
PART 1155--SOLID WASTE RAIL TRANSFER FACILITIES
Subpart A--General
Sec.
1155.1 Purpose and scope.
1155.2 Definitions.
Subpart B--Procedures Governing Petitions To Require a Facility in
Existence on October 16, 2008, To Apply for a Land-Use-Exemption Permit
1155.10 Contents of petition.
1155.11 Filing and service of petition.
1155.12 Participation in petition procedures.
1155.13 Board determination with respect to a Governor's petition.
Subpart C--Procedures Governing Applications for a Land-Use-Exemption
Permit
1155.20 Notice of intent to apply for a land-use-exemption permit.
1155.21 Contents of application.
1155.22 Filings and service of application.
1155.23 Participation in application proceedings.
1155.24 Environmental review.
1155.25 Transfer and termination of a land-use-exemption permit.
1155.26 Board determinations under 49 U.S.C. 10909.
1155.27 Petitions to modify, amend, or revoke a land-use-exemption
permit.
Appendix A to Part 1155--Form Notice of Intent To Apply
Appendix B to Part 1155--Form Federal Register Notice
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 721(a), 10908, 10909, 10910.
PART 1155--SOLID WASTE RAIL TRANSFER FACILITIES
Subpart A--General
Sec. 1155.1 Purpose and scope.
49 U.S.C. 10501(c)(2)(B) excludes solid waste rail transfer
facilities from the Board's jurisdiction except as provided under 49
U.S.C. 10908 and 10909. Sections 10908 and 10909 provide the Board
authority to issue land-use-exemption permits for solid waste rail
transfer facilities when certain conditions are met. The regulations in
this part concern land-use-exemption permits and the Board's standard
for review.
Sec. 1155.2 Definitions.
(a) Unless otherwise provided in the text of these regulations, the
following definitions apply in this part:
(1) Commercial and retail waste means material discarded by stores,
offices, restaurants, warehouses, nonmanufacturing activities at
industrial facilities, and other similar establishments or facilities.
(2) Construction and demolition debris means waste building
materials, packaging, and rubble resulting from construction,
remodeling, repair, and demolition operations on pavements, houses,
commercial buildings, and other structures.
(3) Environmental Impact Statement or ``EIS'' means the detailed
written statement required by the National Environmental Policy Act, 42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(c), for a major federal action significantly affecting
the quality of the human environment.
(4) Household waste means material discarded by residential
dwellings, hotels, motels, and other similar permanent or temporary
housing establishments or facilities.
(5) Industrial waste means the solid waste generated by
manufacturing and industrial and research and development processes and
operations, including contaminated soil, nonhazardous oil spill cleanup
waste and dry nonhazardous pesticides and chemical waste, but does not
include hazardous waste regulated under subtitle C of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.), mining or oil and gas waste.
(6) Institutional waste means material discarded by schools,
nonmedical waste discarded by hospitals, material discarded by
nonmanufacturing activities at prisons and government facilities, and
material discarded by other similar establishments or facilities.
(7) Municipal solid waste means household waste, commercial and
retail waste, and institutional waste.
(8) Office of Environmental Analysis or ``OEA'' means the Board
staff that prepares the Board's environmental documents and analyses.
(9) Solid waste means construction and demolition debris; municipal
solid waste; household waste; commercial and retail waste;
institutional waste; sludge; industrial waste; and other solid waste,
as determined appropriate by the Board, but not waste generated by a
rail carrier during track, track structure, or right-of-way
construction, maintenance, or repair (including railroad ties and line-
side poles), or waste generated as a result of a railroad accident,
incident, or derailment.
(10) Solid waste rail transfer facility--
(i) Means the portion of a facility owned or operated by or on
behalf of a rail carrier (as defined in 49 U.S.C. 10102) where solid
waste, as a commodity to be transported for a charge, is collected,
stored, separated, processed, treated, managed, disposed of, or
transferred, when the activity
[[Page 69775]]
takes place outside of original shipping containers; but
(ii) Does not include--
(A) The portion of a facility to the extent that activities taking
place at such portion are comprised solely of the railroad
transportation of solid waste after the solid waste is loaded for
shipment on or in a rail car, including railroad transportation for the
purpose of interchanging railroad cars containing solid waste
shipments; or
(B) A facility where solid waste is solely transferred or
transloaded from a tank truck directly to a rail tank car.
(11) Sludge means any solid, semi-solid, or liquid waste generated
from a municipal, commercial, or industrial wastewater treatment plant,
water supply treatment plant, or air pollution control facility
exclusive of the treated effluent from a wastewater treatment plant.
(b) Exceptions. Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the
terms household waste, commercial and retail waste, and institutional
waste do not include yard waste and refuse-derived fuel; used oil; wood
pallets; clean wood; medical or infectious waste; or motor vehicles
(including motor vehicle parts or vehicle fluff).
(c) Land-use-exemption permit means the authorization issued by the
Board pursuant to the authority of 49 U.S.C. 10909(a) and includes the
term ``siting permit'' in 49 U.S.C. 10909(e).
(d) State laws, regulations, orders, or other requirements
affecting the siting of a facility, as used in 49 U.S.C. 10909(f) and
49 CFR 1155.27(d), include the requirements of a state or a political
subdivision of a state, including a locality or municipality, affecting
the siting of a facility.
(e) State requirement, as used in 49 U.S.C. 10908 does not include
the laws, regulations, ordinances, orders, or other requirements of a
political subdivision of a state, including a locality or municipality,
unless a state expressly delegates such authority to such political
subdivision.
Subpart B--Procedures Governing Petitions To Require a Facility in
Existence on October 16, 2008, To Apply for a Land-Use-Exemption
Permit
Sec. 1155.10 Contents of petition.
A petition to require a solid waste rail transfer facility in
existence on October 16, 2008, to apply for a land-use-exemption
permit, submitted by the Governor of the state or that Governor's
designee, shall contain the following information:
(a) The Governor's name.
(b) The state's name and the name of any agency filing on behalf of
the Governor.
(c) The full address of the solid waste rail transfer facility, or,
if not available, the city, state, and United States Postal Service ZIP
code.
(d) The name of the rail carrier that owns or operates the facility
or the rail carrier on whose behalf the facility is operated.
(e) A good-faith certification that the facility qualified as a
solid waste rail transfer facility as defined in 49 U.S.C.
10908(e)(1)(H) and 49 CFR 1155.2, on October 16, 2008.
(f) Relief sought (that the rail carrier that owns or operates the
facility be required to apply for a land-use-exemption permit).
(g) Name, title, and address of representative of petitioner to
whom correspondence should be sent.
Sec. 1155.11 Filing and service of petition.
(a) When the petition is filed with the Board, the petitioner shall
serve concurrently, by first class mail, a copy of the petition on the
rail carrier that owns or operates the solid waste rail transfer
facility and on the facility if the address is different than the rail
carrier's address. A copy of the certificate of service shall be filed
with the Board at the same time.
(b) Upon the filing of a petition, the Board will review the
petition and determine whether it conforms to all applicable
regulations. If the petition is substantially incomplete or is
otherwise defective, the Board will reject the petition without
prejudice for stated reasons by order within 15 days from the date of
filing of the petition.
(c) If the petition is rejected, a revised petition may be
resubmitted, and the Board will determine whether the resubmitted
application conforms with all prescribed regulations.
Sec. 1155.12 Participation in petition proceedings.
(a) An interested person may file a reply to the petition
challenging any of the information contained in the petition that is
required by 49 CFR 1155.10(c) through (e) and may offer evidence to
support its contention. The petitioner will have an opportunity to file
a rebuttal.
(b) A facility can acknowledge that it was a solid waste rail
transfer facility on October 16, 2008, but no longer operates as such
and therefore is not required to seek a land-use-exemption permit. To
do so, a facility must file with the Board a certification stating that
it:
(1) No longer operates as a solid waste transfer facility;
(2) Understands that by certifying that it no longer operates as a
solid waste transfer facility, it no longer qualifies as a facility in
existence on October 16, 2008 for purposes of the Clean Railroad Act
and these regulations; and
(3) Understands that if it seeks a land-use-exemption permit in the
future, it would be required to do so as a proposed facility.
(c) Filing and service of replies. (1) Any reply shall be filed
with the Board (the Chief, Section of Administration, Office of
Proceedings, Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20423) within 20 days of the filing with the Board of
the petition.
(2) A copy of the reply shall be served on petitioner or its
representative at the time of filing with the Board. Each filing shall
contain a certificate of service.
(3) Any rebuttal to a reply shall be filed and served by petitioner
no later than 30 days after the filing of the petition.
Sec. 1155.13 Board determination with respect to a Governor's
petition.
The Board shall accept the Governor's complete petition on a
finding that the facility qualified as a solid waste rail transfer
facility, as defined in 49 U.S.C. 10908(e)(1)(H) and 49 CFR 1155.2, on
October 16, 2008. If the Board finds that the facility currently does
not qualify for or require a land-use-exemption permit, any future use
of the facility as a solid waste rail transfer facility would require
an application for a land-use-exemption permit as a proposed facility
and/or the proper state permits. In a decision granting the Governor's
petition, the Board shall require that the rail carrier that owns or
operates the facility, or the operator of the facility, file a land-
use-exemption-permit application within 120 days of the service date of
the decision.
Subpart C--Procedures Governing Applications for a Land-Use-
Exemption Permit
Sec. 1155.20 Notice of intent to apply for a land-use-exemption
permit.
(a) Filing and publication requirements. An applicant (i.e., a
solid waste rail transfer facility, or the rail carrier that owns or
operates the facility) shall give its Notice of Intent to file a land-
use-exemption-permit application by complying with the following
procedures:
(1) Filing. Applicant must serve its Notice of Intent on the Board
in the format prescribed in Appendix A to this part. The Notice of
Intent shall be filed in accordance with the time
[[Page 69776]]
requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Service. Applicant must serve, by first-class mail (unless
otherwise specified), its Notice of Intent upon:
(i) The Governor of the state where the facility is located;
(ii) The municipality, the state, and any relevant political
subdivision of a state or federal or state regional planning entity in
the jurisdiction of which the solid waste rail transfer facility is
located or proposed to be located; and
(iii) The appropriate managing government agencies responsible for
the groups of land listed in 49 U.S.C. 10909(c)(2).
(3) Newspaper publication. Applicant must publish its Notice of
Intent at least once during each of 3 consecutive weeks in a newspaper
of general circulation in each county in which any part of the proposed
or existing facility is located.
(b) Time limits. (1) The Notice of Intent must be served on the
parties discussed above at least 15 days, but not more than 30 days,
prior to the filing of the land-use-exemption-permit application;
(2) The three required newspaper Notices must be published within
the 30-day period prior to the filing of the application; and
(3) The Notice of Intent must be filed with the Board either
concurrently with service on the required parties or when the Notice is
first published (whichever occurs first).
(c) Environmental and Historic Reports. Applicant must also submit
an Environmental and/or Historic Report containing the information
described at 49 CFR 1155.24(b), 1105.7, and 1105.8, to the extent
applicable, at least 45 days prior to filing an application. OEA may
reject any report that it deems inadequate. The environmental and
historic reporting requirements that would otherwise apply are waived,
however, if the applicant or the Board hires a third-party consultant,
OEA approves the scope of the consultant's work, and the consultant
works under OEA's supervision to prepare an EIS or other environmental
documentation. In such a case, the consultant acts on behalf of the
Board, working under OEA's direction to collect the needed
environmental information and compile it into an EIS or other
appropriate environmental documentation. See 49 U.S.C. 10909(h); 49 CFR
1155.24(c).
Sec. 1155.21 Contents of application.
Applications for land-use-exemption permits for the facility, and
any proposed future expansion within 10 years of the application date,
shall contain the following information, including supporting
documentation:
(a) General. (1) Exact name of applicant.
(2) Whether applicant is a common carrier by railroad subject to 49
U.S.C. Subtitle IV, chapter 105.
(3) Summary of why a land-use-exemption permit is being sought.
(4) The full address of the solid waste rail transfer facility, or,
if not available, the city, state, and United States Postal Service ZIP
code.
(5) The name of the rail carrier that owns or operates the facility
or the rail carrier on whose behalf the facility is operated, the line
of railroad serving the facility, the milepost location of the
facility, and the milepost and names of the stations that the facility
is located between.
(6) Name, title, and address of representative of applicant to whom
comments should be sent.
(7) Copies of the specific state, local, or municipal laws,
regulations, orders, or other requirements affecting the siting of the
solid waste rail transfer facility from which the applicant requests
entire or partial exemption, any publicly available material providing
the criteria for the application of the state, local, or municipal
laws, regulations, orders, or other requirements affecting the siting,
and a description of any action that the state, local, or municipal
authority has taken affecting the siting of the facility. The applicant
shall state whether each law, regulation, order or other requirement
from which an exemption is sought is an environmental, public health,
or public safety standard that falls under the traditional police
powers of the state. If the applicant states that the requirement is
not such a standard, it shall explain the reasons for its statement.
(8) Certification that the laws, regulations, orders or other
requirements from which the applicant requests exemption are not based
on federal laws, regulations, orders, or other requirements.
(9) Certification that the facility complies with all state, local,
or municipal laws, regulations, orders, or other requirements affecting
the siting of the facility except for those from which it seeks
exemption.
(10) Certification that the applicant has applied or will apply for
the appropriate state permits not affecting siting.
(11) For facilities not in existence as of October 16, 2008,
certification that the facility is not proposed to be located on land
within any unit of or land affiliated with the National Park System,
the National Wildlife Refuge System, the National Wilderness
Preservation System, the National Trails System, the National Wild and
Scenic Rivers System, a National Reserve, or a National Monument. For
facilities in existence as of October 16, 2008, state whether the
facility is located in any of these types of lands.
(12) For facilities not in existence as of October 16, 2008,
certification that the facility is not proposed to be located on lands
referenced in The Highlands Conservation Act, Public Law No. 108-421,
for which a state has implemented a conservation management plan, or,
that the facility is consistent with the restrictions implemented by
the applicable state under The Highlands Conservation Act, Public Law
No. 108-421, placed on its proposed location. For facilities in
existence as of October 16, 2008, state whether the facility is located
on any of these lands, and, if so, address whether the facility is
consistent with the restrictions placed on the location by the
applicable state under that law.
(13) An explanation of how the facility comes within the Board's
jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. 10501.
(14) The owner and operator of the facility.
(15) The interest of the rail carrier in the facility.
(16) An explanation of how the facility meets the definition of a
solid waste rail transfer facility at 49 U.S.C. 10909(e)(1)(H).
(17) A statement whether the applicant has sought permission from
the applicable state, local, or municipal authority with respect to
some or all of the facility in its application and received an
unsatisfactory result affecting the siting of the facility. The
applicant shall provide information about the unsatisfactory result and
shall include all relevant orders, decisions, or other notices of the
denial.
(18) A detailed description of the operations and activities that
will occur/are occurring at the facility.
(19) Detailed map showing the subject facility on sheets not larger
than 11x17 inches, drawn to scale, and with the scale shown thereon.
The map must show, in clear relief, the exact location of the facility
on the rail line and its relation to other rail lines in the area,
highways, water routes, population centers, and any geographic features
that should be considered in determining whether the facility would
pose an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, or the environment,
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10909(c)(1).
[[Page 69777]]
(20) Detailed drawing of the subject facility on sheets not larger
than 11x17 inches, drawn to scale, and with the scale shown thereon.
The drawing must show, in clear relief, the exact boundaries of the
facility, structures at the facility, the location and type of the
operations taking place at the facility, the proposed traffic
configuration for the solid waste entering and leaving the facility,
reasonable future expansion planned for the next 10 years that the
applicant requests to be included in the land-use-exemption permit, any
geographic features that should be considered in determining whether
the facility would pose an unreasonable risk to public health, safety,
or the environment, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10909(c)(1), and any other
information that the applicant believes would be relevant.
(21) A detailed justification for why any future expansion planned
for the next 10 years should be covered by the land-use-exemption
permit.
(b) Statement. A statement that sets forth, based on currently
available information, the reasons why the Board should grant a land-
use-exemption permit to the applicant under the standards in 49 U.S.C.
10909(c), (d) and the regulations in this part. Specifically, the
applicant shall include an explanation of whether the laws,
regulations, or other requirements affecting siting of the facility
from which exemption is sought, on their face or as applied,
unreasonably burden the interstate transportation of solid waste by
railroad or discriminate against the railroad transportation of solid
waste and a solid waste rail transfer facility, and, if so, why.
(c) Environmental impact. The applicant shall certify that it has
submitted an Environmental and/or Historic Report containing the
information in 49 CFR 1155.24(b), 1105.7, and 1105.8, to the extent
applicable, if an Environmental and/or Historic Report is required. See
49 CFR 1155.20(c).
(d) Additional information. The applicant shall submit such
additional information to support its application as the Board may
require.
(e) Draft Federal Register Notice. The applicant shall submit a
draft notice of its application to be published by the Board. In
addition to the regular number of copies that must be filed with the
Board, the applicant must submit a copy of the draft notice as data
contained on a computer diskette compatible with the Board's current
word processing capabilities. The Board will publish the notice in the
Federal Register within 20 days of the application's filing with the
Board. The draft notice shall be in the form set forth in Appendix B to
this part.
(f) Verification. The original application shall be executed and
verified in the form set forth below by an officer of the applicant
having knowledge of the facts and matters relied upon.
Verification
State of -------- ss.
County of --------
------------ (Name of affiant) makes oath and says that (s)he is
the -------- (title of affiant) of the -------- (name of applicant)
applicant herein; that (s)he has been authorized by the applicant (or
as appropriate, a court) to verify and file with the Surface
Transportation Board the foregoing application in Finance Docket No. --
-- (Sub-No. ----); that (s)he has carefully examined all of the
statements in the application as well as the exhibits attached thereto
and made a part thereof; that (s)he has knowledge of the facts and
matters relied upon in the application; and that all representations
set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge, information, and belief.
(Signature)
Subscribed and sworn to before me -------- in and for the State and
County above named, this ---- day of ----, 20----.
My commission expires --------
Sec. 1155.22 Filings and service of application.
(a) The applicant shall tender with its application an affidavit
attesting to its compliance with the notice requirements of 49 CFR
1155.20. The affidavit shall include the dates of service, posting, and
newspaper publication of the Notice of Intent.
(b) When the application is filed with the Board, the applicant
shall serve concurrently, by first-class mail, a copy on the Governor
of the state where the facility is located; the municipality, the
state, and any relevant political subdivision of a state or federal or
state regional planning entity of the jurisdiction in which the solid
waste rail transfer facility is located or proposed to be located; and
the appropriate managing government agencies responsible for the groups
of land listed in 49 U.S.C. 10909(c)(2). A copy of the certificate of
service shall be filed with the Board at the same time.
(c) The applicant shall promptly furnish by first class mail a copy
of the application to any interested person proposing to file a comment
upon request. A copy of the certificate of service shall be filed with
the Board at the same time.
(d)(1) Upon the filing of a land-use-exemption-permit application,
the Board will review the application and determine whether it conforms
to all applicable regulations. If the application is substantially
incomplete or is otherwise defective, the Board shall reject the
application for stated reasons by order within 20 days from the date of
filing of the application. If the Board does not reject the
application, notice of the filing of the application shall be published
in the Federal Register by the Board, through the Director of the
Office of Proceedings, within 20 days of the filing of the application.
(2) If the application is rejected, a revised application may be
submitted and the Board will determine whether the resubmitted
application conforms with all prescribed regulations. A properly
revised application submitted within 60 days of the order rejecting the
incomplete or improper application need not be subject to new notice
and publication under Sec. 1155.20, unless the defect causing the
rejection was in the notice and/or publication. A revised application
submitted after such 60-day period must be newly published and noticed.
(3) The resubmission of a complete and properly filed land-use-
exemption-permit application shall be considered a de novo filing for
the purposes of computation of the time periods prescribed in the
regulations contained in this part.
(4) An applicant may seek waiver of specific regulations listed in
subpart C of this part by filing a petition for waiver with the Board.
When the petition is filed with the Board, the applicant shall serve,
by first-class mail, a copy on the Governor of the state where the
facility is located; the municipality, the state, and any relevant
political subdivision of a state or federal or state regional planning
entity of the jurisdiction in which the solid waste rail transfer
facility is located or proposed to be located; and the appropriate
managing government agencies responsible for the groups of land listed
in 49 U.S.C. 10909(c)(2). A copy of the certificate of service shall be
filed with the Board at the same time. A decision by the Director of
the Office of Proceedings granting or denying a waiver petition will be
issued within 30 days of the date the petition is filed. Appeals from
the Director's decision will be decided by the entire Board. If waiver
is not obtained prior to the filing of the application, the application
may be subject to rejection.
[[Page 69778]]
Sec. 1155.23 Participation in application proceedings.
(a) Initial comments. Interested persons may become parties to a
land-use-exemption-permit proceeding by filing initial comments with
the Board within 45 days of the filing of the application. Comments
should contain the following information, as appropriate:
(1) Name, address, and organizational affiliation.
(2) A statement describing commenter's interest in the proceeding,
including information concerning any organization or public interest it
represents.
(3) Reasons, in general, why commenter supports or opposes the
application, taking into account the standards for the Board's review
and consideration set forth in 49 U.S.C. 10909(c), (d) and this part.
(4) Any rebuttal to the evidence and argument submitted by
applicant.
(b) Final comments. Interested persons, including the applicant,
within 30 days after the close of OEA's environmental review, may
comment on how the information developed during OEA's environmental
review concerning the considerations at 49 U.S.C. 10909(d)(1) through
(5) should be weighed with the remaining transportation and other
relevant considerations at 49 U.S.C. 10909(d)(6) through (7). The
parties will have an additional 15 days to respond to other parties'
arguments. All pleadings shall be limited to weighing the information
developed during OEA's environmental review with transportation and
other concerns, and should not be directed towards the adequacy of
OEA's environmental review. (Interested persons may comment on the
adequacy of OEA's environmental review during the normal comment period
for the EIS as provided in 49 CFR 1105.10(a)(4). See 49 CFR
1155.24(a).) All comments under this paragraph shall contain the
information required in paragraphs (a)(1) through (2) of this section.
(c) Filing and service of comments and replies (including evidence
and argument). (1) Initial comments shall be filed with the Board
(addressed to the Chief, Section of Administration, Office of
Proceedings, Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20423) within 45 days of the filing with the Board of a
land-use-exemption-permit application. An original and 10 copies of
each comment shall be filed with the Board. A copy of each comment
shall be served on applicant or its representative at the time of
filing with the Board. Each filing shall contain a certificate of
service.
(2) Final comments shall be filed and served on all parties within
30 days of the close of the environmental review. An original and 10
copies of such comments shall be filed with the Board. A copy of each
comment shall be served on applicant or its representative at the time
of filing with the Board. Each filing shall contain a certificate of
service.
(3) Replies to final comments shall be filed and served on all
parties no later than 45 days after the close of the environmental
review. An original and 10 copies of such replies shall be filed with
the Board. A copy of each reply to comments shall be served on
applicant or its representative at the time of filing with the Board.
Each filing shall contain a certificate of service.
Sec. 1155.24 Environmental review.
(a) A land-use-exemption permit generally will require the
preparation of an EIS. OEA may reclassify the environmental review
requirements of land-use-exemption proceedings on a case-by-case basis,
pursuant to 49 CFR 1105.6(d).
(b) An applicant for a land-use-exemption permit must submit an
Environmental Report, at least 45 days prior to filing a land-use-
exemption-permit application, containing the information described at
49 CFR 1105.7 to the extent applicable to solid waste rail transfer
facilities. Applicants shall concurrently file a Historic Report
containing the information at 49 CFR 1105.8 if applicable. The
Environmental Report must also contain a discussion of the five factors
for consideration listed at 49 U.S.C. 10909(d)(1) through (5) and
address any associated environmental impacts as they relate to the
facility for which a land-use-exemption permit is sought.
(c) The Board strongly encourages applicants to use third-party
contractors to assist OEA in preparing the appropriate environmental
documentation in land-use-exemption-permit proceedings. See 49 CFR
1105.10(d). The environmental reporting requirements outlined above
that would otherwise apply are waived if an applicant hires a third-
party contractor, OEA approves the scope of the contractor's work, and
the contractor works under OEA's direct supervision. See 49 CFR
1105.10(d). If an applicant does not hire an independent third-party
contractor, the Board may hire a third-party contractor and charge the
costs for the contractor to the applicant. See 49 U.S.C. 10909(h).
(d) The Board's procedures set forth in 49 CFR 1105.10 for
implementation of environmental laws are controlling unless superseded
by provisions in this Part.
(e) An applicant for a land-use-exemption permit must follow the
Board's procedures at 49 CFR 1105.9 for compliance with the Coastal
Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1451 through 1465, if that act is
applicable.
Sec. 1155.25 Transfer and termination of a land-use-exemption permit.
(a) A land-use-exemption permit may be transferred from a rail
carrier to an acquiring rail carrier without the need for a new
application for a land-use-exemption permit if the rail line associated
with the solid waste rail transfer facility is transferred to another
rail carrier or to an entity formed to become a rail carrier pursuant
to authority granted by the Board under 49 U.S.C. 10901, 10902, or
11323. When seeking Board authority under 49 U.S.C. 10901, 10902, or
11323, the applicant(s) shall specifically advise the Board, the
municipality, the state, and any relevant political subdivision of a
state or federal or state regional planning entity of the jurisdiction
in which the solid waste rail transfer facility is located, of the
intended transfer. The Federal Register notice concerning the
acquisition shall include a statement that a solid waste rail transfer
facility with a Board-issued land-use-exemption permit is included in
the acquisition.
(b) When a carrier plans to cease using a facility as a solid waste
rail transfer facility, or when a facility is transferred to any party
in any manner other than that described in paragraph (a) of this
section, the entity that received the land-use-exemption permit must
notify the Board, the municipality, the state, and any relevant
political subdivision of a state or federal or state regional planning
entity of the jurisdiction in which the solid waste rail transfer
facility is located, in writing no later than 60 days prior to the
proposed cessation or transfer. Upon receipt of that notice, the Board
will publish notice in the Federal Register that the land-use-exemption
permit will be terminated on the 60th day unless otherwise ordered by
the Board.
Sec. 1155.26 Board determinations under 49 U.S.C. 10909.
(a) Schedule. (1) The schedule in paragraph (a)(2) of this section
shall govern the process for Board consideration and decisions in land-
use-exemption-permit application proceedings from the time the
application is filed until the time of the Board's decision on the
merits:
(2) At least 45 days prior to filing of application--Environmental
Report
[[Page 69779]]
(and/or Historic Report, if applicable) filed and environmental process
initiated pursuant to 49 CFR 1155.24. Within 30 days prior to filing of
application--Notice of Intent filed with the Board pursuant to the
deadlines and requirements described in 49 CFR 1155.20(b)(3).
(i) Day 0--Application filed.
(ii) Day 20--Due date for Notice of Application to be published in
the Federal Register.
(iii) Day 45--Due date for initial comments.
(iv) 30 days after the Final EIS (or other final environmental
documentation) is issued by OEA--Due date for final comments.
(v) 45 days after the Final EIS (or other final environmental
documentation) is issued by OEA--Due date for replies to final
comments.
(3) A decision on the merits will be due 90 days after a full
record is developed.
(b) Standard for review. (1) The Board will issue a land-use-
exemption permit only if it determines that the facility at the
existing or proposed location would not pose an unreasonable risk to
public health, safety, or the environment. In deciding whether a solid
waste rail transfer facility that is or proposed to be constructed or
operated by or on behalf of a rail carrier poses an unreasonable risk
to public health, safety, or the environment, the Board shall weigh the
particular facility's potential benefits to and the adverse impacts on
public health, public safety, the environment, interstate commerce, and
transportation of solid waste by rail.
(2) The Board will not grant a land-use-exemption permit for a
solid waste rail transfer facility proposed to be located on land
within any unit of or land affiliated with the National Park System,
the National Wildlife Refuge System, the National Wilderness
Preservation System, the National Trails System, the National Wild and
Scenic Rivers System, a National Reserve, or a National Monument.
(3) The Board will not grant a land-use-exemption permit for a
solid waste rail transfer facility proposed to be located on land
within any unit of or land affiliated with lands referenced in The
Highlands Conservation Act, Public Law No. 108-421, for which a state
has implemented a conservation management plan, if operation of the
facility would be inconsistent with restrictions placed on such land.
(4) The Board will reject an application from a person who is not a
rail carrier, but is instead operating on behalf of a rail carrier
unless;
(i) The applicant has sought permission from the applicable state,
local, or municipal authority with respect to some or all of the
property in the application and received an unsatisfactory result
affecting the siting of the facility, or
(ii) The Governor of the state has petitioned the Board to require
the facility to apply under subpart B of this part.
(5) The Board will issue a land-use-exemption permit to an
applicant that has received an unsatisfactory result from a state,
local or municipal authority affecting the siting of the facility only
if it finds that the laws, regulations, or other requirements affect
the siting of the facility, on their face or as applied, either;
(i) Unreasonably burden the interstate transportation of solid
waste by railroad, or
(ii) Discriminate against the railroad transportation of solid
waste and a solid waste rail transfer facility.
(6) A land-use-exemption permit will only exempt state, local, or
municipal laws, regulations, orders, other requirements, or portions
thereof, affecting the siting of the solid waste rail transfer
facility.
(c) Considerations. As required by 49 U.S.C. 10909(d), the Board
will consider and give due weight to the following, as applicable:
(1) The land-use, zoning, and siting regulations or solid waste
planning requirements of the state or state subdivision in which the
facility is or will be located that are applicable to solid waste
transfer facilities, including those that are not owned or operated by
or on behalf of a rail carrier;
(2) The land-use, zoning, and siting regulations or solid waste
planning requirements applicable to the property where the solid waste
rail transfer facility is proposed to be located;
(3) Regional transportation planning requirements developed
pursuant to federal and state law;
(4) Regional solid waste disposal plans developed pursuant to
federal or state law;
(5) Any federal and state environmental protection laws or
regulations applicable to the site;
(6) Any unreasonable burdens imposed on the interstate
transportation of solid waste by railroad, or the potential for
discrimination against the railroad transportation of solid waste, a
solid waste rail transfer facility, or a rail carrier that owns or
operates such a facility; and
(7) Any other relevant factors, as determined by the Board.
(d) Permits. If the Board grants a land-use-exemption permit for a
solid waste rail transfer facility, such permit will only exempt a
facility from complying with state laws, regulations, orders, or other
requirements affecting the siting of the facility that are specified
therein. The permit will require compliance with all other state laws,
regulations, orders, or other requirements not otherwise expressly
exempted in the permit.
Sec. 1155.27 Petitions to modify, amend, or revoke a land-use-
exemption permit.
General rule. Petitions to modify, amend, or revoke land-use-
exemption permits shall be decided in accordance with the Board's
normal standard of review for petitions to reopen administratively
final Board actions at 49 CFR 1115.4. The petition must demonstrate
material error, new evidence, or substantially changed circumstances
that warrant the requested action, and is subject to these additional
conditions:
(a) An entity that petitions for a modification or amendment
requesting an expansion of federal preemption or the facility's
operations or physical size is subject to the notice and application
requirements in this subpart C. The language of the notifications shall
be modified to note that the petition is for a modification or
amendment.
(b) The Board will approve or deny petitions to modify, amend, or
revoke a land-use-exemption permit within 90 days after the full record
for the petition is developed.
Appendix A to Part 1155--Form Notice of Intent To Apply
Docket No. FD ----(Sub-No. ----)
Notice of Intent to apply for a land-use-exemption permit for a
solid waste rail transfer facility.
(Name of Applicant) gives notice that on or about (insert date
application will be filed with the Board) it intends to file with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW., Washington, DC
20423, an application for a land-use-exemption permit for a solid
waste rail transfer facility as defined in 49 U.S.C. 10908(e)(1)(H)
and 49 CFR 1155.2. The solid waste rail transfer facility, owned by
(name of owner), and operated by (name of operator), is located at
(full address, or, if not available, provide city, state, and United
States Postal Service ZIP code). The solid waste rail transfer
facility is located on a (name of rail carrier) line of railroad
known as -------- at milepost -------- between (station name) at
milepost -------- and (station name) at milepost --------.
The reason(s) for the proposed permit application is (are) ----
---- (explain briefly and clearly the activities undertaken, or
proposed to be undertaken, by the applicant at the solid waste rail
transfer facility. Describe the specific state and local laws,
[[Page 69780]]
regulations, orders or other requirements affecting siting from
which the applicant requests entire or partial exemption and any
action that the state, local, or municipal authority has taken
affecting the siting of the facility. Also, if applicant is not the
rail carrier, provide the name of the rail carrier that owns or
operates the facility or has the facility operated on its behalf.)
(Include this paragraph for facilities not in existence on
October 16, 2008). Applicant certifies that, based on information in
its possession, the facility is not proposed to be located on land
within any unit of or land affiliated with the National Park System,
the National Wildlife Refuge System, the National Wilderness
Preservation System, the National Trails System, the National Wild
and Scenic Rivers System, a National Reserve, or a National
Monument. Applicant further certifies that the facility is not
proposed to be located on lands referenced in The Highlands
Conservation Act, Public Law 108-421, for which a state has
implemented a conservation management plan (or, The facility is
consistent with the restrictions implemented by (state) under The
Highlands Conservation Act, Public Law 108-421, placed at its
proposed location). Any relevant documentation in the railroad's
possession on these issues will be made available promptly to those
requesting it.
(For facilities already in existence on October 16, 2008,
address the extent to which the facility is or is not located in any
of these types of lands, and to the extent that it is so located
address any relevant criteria, and so certify.)
The application containing the information set forth at 49 CFR
1155.21 will include the applicant's case for the granting of the
land-use-exemption permit. Any interested person, after the
application is filed on (insert date), may file with the Surface
Transportation Board initial comments concerning the application
within 45 days after the application is filed.
The party's initial comments should contain that party's initial
arguments in support or opposition based on the information
available at that point including the following, as appropriate:
(1) Name, address, and organizational affiliation.
(2) A statement describing commenter's interest in the
proceeding, including information concerning the organization or
public interest the commenter represents.
(3) Specific reasons why commenter supports or opposes the
application, taking into account the standards for the Board's
review and consideration provided in 49 U.S.C. 10909(c), (d), and
the Board's regulations at 49 CFR 1155.27.
(4) If the applicant files under 49 CFR 1155.22, specific
reasons why commenter supports or opposes the Board's accepting the
application.
(5) Any rebuttal of material submitted by applicant.
The parties' initial comments will be considered by the Board in
determining what disposition to make of the application. Parties
seeking further information concerning the filing of comments should
refer to 49 CFR 1155.24.
Interested persons also will have the opportunity to provide
detailed comments during the Board's environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act. 49 CFR 1105.10 and 49 CFR
1155.25. Questions concerning the environmental review process or
potential environmental issues may be directed to the Board's Office
of Environmental Analysis (OEA). After the close of the
environmental review, interested parties may file final comments on
how the information developed during the environmental review should
be weighed by the Board in determining whether to grant the
requested land-use-exemption permit. See 49 CFR part 1155 for
details on these processes.
All comments should indicate the proceeding designation Docket
No. FD ---- (Sub-No. ----). Initial comments must be filed with the
Chief, Section of Administration, Office of Proceedings, Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20423, no
later than (insert the date 45 days after the date applicant intends
to file its application). A copy of each comment shall be served
upon the representative of the applicant (insert name, address, and
phone number). Except as otherwise set forth in 49 CFR part 1155,
each document filed with the Board must be served on all parties to
the land-use-exemption-permit proceeding. See 49 CFR 1104.12(a).
Persons seeking further information concerning land-use-
exemption-permit procedures may contact the Surface Transportation
Board or refer to 49 U.S.C. 10908, 10909, and the full land-use-
exemption-permit regulations at 49 CFR part 1155.
A copy of the application will be available for public
inspection on or after (insert date the land-use-exemption-permit
application is to be filed with Board) and will be available on the
Board's Web site at https://www.stb.dot.gov. The applicant shall
furnish a copy of the application to any interested person proposing
to file a comment, upon request.
Appendix B to Part 1155--Form Federal Register Notice
Docket No. FD ---- (Sub-No. ----)
Notice of Application for a land-use-exemption permit for a
solid waste rail transfer facility.
On (insert date application was filed with the Board) (name of
applicant) filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20423, an application for a land-use-exemption
permit for a solid waste rail transfer facility. The solid waste
rail transfer facility, owned by (name of owner), and operated by
(name of operator), is located at (full address, or, if not
available, provide city, state, and United States Postal Service ZIP
code). The solid waste rail transfer facility is located on a line
of (name of rail carrier) railroad known as -------- at milepost --
------ between (station name) at milepost -------- and (station
name) at milepost --------. The application explains why applicant
believes its request for a land-use-exemption permit should be
granted.
(Include this paragraph for facilities not in existence on
October 16, 2008). The facility is not proposed to be located on
land within any unit of or land affiliated with the National Park
System, the National Wildlife Refuge System, the National Wilderness
Preservation System, the National Trails System, the National Wild
and Scenic Rivers System, a National Reserve, or a National
Monument. The facility is not proposed to be located on lands
referenced in The Highlands Conservation Act, Public Law No. 108-
421, for which a state has implemented a conservation management
plan (or, The facility is consistent with the restrictions
implemented by (state) under The Highlands Conservation Act, Public
Law 108-421, placed on its proposed location). Any relevant
documentation in the railroad's possession will be made available
promptly to those requesting it.
(For facilities already in existence on October 16, 2008,
address the extent to which the facility is or is not located in any
of these types of lands, and to the extent that it is so located
address any relevant criteria, and so certify.)
Any interested person may file with the Surface Transportation
Board initial comments concerning the application within 45 days of
the filing of the application. Persons seeking information
concerning the filing of initial comments should refer to 49 CFR
1155.23.
All comments should indicate the proceeding designation Finance
Docket No. ---- (Sub-No. ----). Initial comments must be filed with
the Chief, Section of Administration, Office of Proceedings, Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20423, no
later than (insert the date 45 days after the date applicant intends
to file its application). A copy of each comment shall be served
upon the representative of the applicant (insert name, address, and
phone number). Except as otherwise set forth in 49 CFR part 1155,
each document filed with the Board must be served on all parties to
the land-use-exemption-permit proceeding. 49 CFR 1104.12(a).
Persons seeking further information concerning land-use-
exemption-permit procedures may contact the Surface Transportation
Board or refer to 49 U.S.C. 10908, 10909, 10910, and the Board's
implementing land-use-exemption-permit regulations at 49 CFR part
1155.
A copy of the application is available for public inspection.
The applicant shall furnish a copy of the application to any
interested person proposing to file a comment, upon request.
Questions concerning the environmental review process or
potential environmental issues may be directed to the Board's Office
of Environmental Analysis (OEA). After the close of the
environmental review, interested parties may file final comments on
how the information developed during the environmental review should
be weighed by the Board in determining whether to grant the
requested land-use-exemption permit. See 49 CFR part 1155 for
details on these processes.
[FR Doc. 2012-28196 Filed 11-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P