Regulated Navigation Area; East River, Flushing and Gowanus Bays, and Red Hook and Buttermilk Channels; New York, NY, 67568-67572 [2012-27490]
Download as PDF
67568
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0623 to read as
follows:
■
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
§ 165.T01–0623 Regulated Navigation
Area: Thames River New London, CT.
(a) Location. The following area is a
regulated navigation area: All navigable
waters of the Thames River adjacent to
Fort Trumbull State Park in New
London, CT, from surface to bottom
bounded to the north by a line
connecting the following points: Point
‘‘1’’, 41°20′40″ N, 072°05′32″ W east to
point ‘‘2’’, 41°20′40″ N, 072°05′15″ W
then southeast to point ‘‘3’’, 41°20′31.8″
N, 072°05′03″ W then south to point
‘‘4’’, 41°20′28″ N, 072°05′03″ W then
east to point ‘‘5’’, 41°20′30″ N,
072°04′48″ W; bounded to the east by
following the shoreline south from point
‘‘5’’ to point ‘‘6’’, 41°20′19″ N,
072°04′46″ W; bounded to the south by
a line connecting the following points:
point ‘‘6’’ west to point ‘‘7’’, 41°20′17″
N, 072°05′13″ W then north to point ‘‘8’’
41°20′27.2″ N, 072°05′15″ W then
northwest to point ‘‘9’’ 41°20′29.5″ N,
072°05′17″ W then west to point ‘‘10’’
41°20′29.5″ N, 072°05′30″ W then
northwest to point ‘‘11’’ 41°20′31″ N,
072°05′34″ W; bounded to the west by
following the shoreline north from point
‘‘11’’ back to the start, point ‘‘1’’.
(b) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.10,
165.11, and 165.13 apply.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations, entry into, anchoring, or
movement within this zone, during
periods of enforcement, is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Long Island Sound (COTP) or the
COTP’s designated representative.
(3) During periods of enforcement, a
‘‘Slow-No-Wake’’ speed limit will be in
effect. Vessels may not produce more
than a minimum wake and may not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Nov 09, 2012
Jkt 229001
attain speeds greater than six knots
unless a higher minimum speed is
necessary to maintain steerageway when
traveling with a strong current. In no
case may the wake produced by the
vessel be such that it would create a
danger of injury to persons, or damage
to vessels or structures.
(4) During periods of enforcement,
SECURITE calls must be made by all
persons and vessels conducting crane or
dive operations.
(5) During periods of enforcement, all
persons and vessels must comply with
all orders and directions from the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(6) During periods of enforcement,
upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or
other means, the operator of the vessel
must proceed as directed.
(7) Persons and vessels may request
permission to enter the zone during
periods of enforcement on VHF–16 or
via phone at 203–468–4401.
(8) Notwithstanding anything
contained in this rule, the Rules of the
Road (33 CFR Part 84—Subchapter E,
inland navigational rules) are still in
effect and must be strictly adhered to at
all times.
(c) Effective period. This rule is
effective until October 31, 2014.
(d) Enforcement period. (1) Except
when suspended in accordance with
paragraph (d)(2) of this section, this
regulated navigation area is in force 24
hours a day until October 31, 2014.
(2) Notice of suspension of
enforcement: The COTP may suspend
enforcement of the regulated navigation
area. If enforcement is suspended, the
COTP will cause notice of the
suspension of enforcement to be made
by all appropriate means to the affected
segments of the public. Such means of
notification may include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and Local Notice to Mariners. Such
notifications will include the date and
time that enforcement is suspended as
well as the date and time that
enforcement will resume.
(3) Violations of this regulated
navigation area must be reported to the
COTP, at 203–468–4401 or on VHFs–
Channel 16. Persons in violation of this
regulated navigation area may be subject
to civil or criminal penalties.
Dated: October 24, 2012.
J.B. McPherson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012–27489 Filed 11–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0950]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; East River,
Flushing and Gowanus Bays, and Red
Hook and Buttermilk Channels; New
York, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary interim rule and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
temporarily establishing a regulated
navigation area (RNA) comprising all
waters between the New York City
Department of Sanitation Marine
Transfer Stations (MTSs) on Gowanus
Bay and Flushing Bay. While the
temporary interim rule is in effect, the
Coast Guard may restrict or prohibit
vessel traffic within the RNA to
accommodate the load-out and transit of
four gantry cranes that will pose an
imminent hazard to vessels operating in
the area.
DATES: This rule is effective with actual
notice for purposes of enforcement from
November 1, 2012 through November
30, 2012, and effective in the Code of
Federal Regulations from November 13,
2012 through November 30, 2012.
Comments and related material must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before
November 30, 2012. Requests for public
meetings must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before November 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of Docket Number
USCG–2012–0950. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Open Docket
Folder’’ on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may submit comments, identified
by docket number, using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Waterways
Management Division at Coast Guard
Sector New York, telephone (718) 354–
4195, email Jeff.M.Yunker@uscg.mil or
Lieutenant Isaac Slavitt, First Coast
Guard District Waterways Management
Division, Boston, MA, telephone (617)
223–8385, email
Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
APA Administrative Procedure Act
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MTS New York City Department of
Sanitation Marine Transfer Station
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
15:16 Nov 09, 2012
Jkt 229001
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated
with this rulemaking. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
1. Submitting Comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit
a Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8 1⁄2; by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67569
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary interim rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553). Section 553(b) provides that
a general notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) must be published ‘‘unless
persons subject thereto are named and
either personally served or otherwise
have actual notice thereof in accordance
with law.’’ This rule identifies the
persons who will be subject to the RNA
regulations: mariners in or seeking to
enter a defined area of the Port of New
York and New Jersey between
November 1, 2012, and November 30,
2012. Each of these persons will be
given actual notice of any restrictions or
prohibitions imposed on them by this
rule. Section 553(b)(B) authorizes an
agency to issue a rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
when the agency for good cause finds
that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking with
respect to this rule because the Coast
Guard received the specific request to
establish a no-wake zone around the
load out and transits from the contractor
on September 6, 2012. There was
insufficient time and therefore it was
impracticable to issue an NPRM and
conduct a prior notice and comment
period. This rule is necessary to protect
the safety of both the gantry crane load
out and transit crews and the waterway
users operating in the vicinity of the
RNA. The proposed movement of the
gantry cranes creates a significant
hazard for waterway users and crane
workers. Any delay or cancellation of
the ongoing New York City Department
of Sanitation MTS facility upgrades
would be contrary to the public interest
as it would delay necessary operations
and increase costs to the public.
Additionally, the dynamic nature of the
gantry crane loading and transit
operations necessitate that all mariners
navigate at a safe speed within the RNA,
as the barge and gantry crane and
construction equipment at the two MTS
facilities will change on a daily basis. In
order to address any further public
concerns, this rule is available for
public comment until November 30,
2012.
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
67570
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
C. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, the Coast Guard has the authority
to establish RNAs in defined water areas
that are determined to have hazardous
conditions and in which vessel traffic
can be regulated in the interest of safety.
See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
The offloading and transit of gantry
cranes involves large machinery and
construction vessel operations above
and in the navigable waters of the Port
of New York and New Jersey. The
ongoing operations are, by their nature,
hazardous and pose risks both to
recreational and commercial traffic as
well as the construction crews. In order
to mitigate the inherent risks involved
in these operations, it is necessary to
control vessel movement through the
area.
The purpose of this rule is to ensure
the safety of waterway users, the public,
and construction workers for the
duration of the gantry crane load-outs
and transits during the effective period.
The RNA will also protect vessels
desiring to transit the area by ensuring
that vessels are only permitted to transit
at No-wake speed.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
D. Discussion of the Interim Rule
The New York City Department of
Sanitation is upgrading Marine Transfer
Stations throughout the City to
containerized operations. This upgrade
requires installation of gantry cranes at
the Gowanus Bay and Flushing Bay
MTS facilities. Four gantry cranes will
be delivered to the Red Hook Container
Terminal in Brooklyn, NY on Buttermilk
Channel. Two of these gantry cranes
will be delivered by the Cheseapeake
1000 to the Gowanus Bay MTS on
Gowanus Bay, approximately 3.0
nautical miles to the southeast. The
other two gantry cranes will be
offloaded onto barges for transit and
offloading to the Flushing Bay MTS on
Flushing Bay, approximately 13.0
nautical miles to the northeast.
The load out and transit of these
gantry cranes involves large machinery
and construction vessel operations
above and upon the navigable waters
between Gowanus Bay, Red Hook and
Buttermilk Channels, East River, and
Flushing Bay. Heavy-lift operations are
sensitive to water movement, and wake
from passing vessels could pose
significant risk of injury or death to
construction workers. The ongoing
operations are, by their nature,
hazardous and pose risks both to
recreational and commercial vessel
traffic and the barge and load out crews.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Nov 09, 2012
Jkt 229001
In order to mitigate the inherent risks
involved in the construction, it is
necessary to control vessel movement
through the area.
This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic on a portion of the
waterways between Gowanus Bay and
Flushing Bay in the Port of New York
and New Jersey while gantry cranes are
loaded onto barges at Red Hook
Container Terminal on Buttermilk
Channel and transit to the MTS facilities
on Gowanus and Flushing Bays.
These operations are tentatively
scheduled to take place starting on
November 1, 2012 and lasting several
days, but this rule will be made effective
through November 30, 2012 to account
for any unforeseen delays. Vessels will
be required to transit at No Wake speed
when meeting or overtaking the vessels
carrying these gantry cranes.
The Coast Guard will notify mariners
of planned waterway transit restrictions
via Marine Information Broadcasts,
Coast Guard Advisory Notices, and at
https://homeport.uscg.mil/newyork.
The Sector New York Captain of the
Port will cause notice of enforcement or
suspension of enforcement, of this RNA
to be made by all appropriate means to
achieve the widest distribution among
the affected segments of the public.
Such means of notification will include,
but is not limited to, Marine Information
Broadcasts, Coast Guard Advisory
Notices, and at https://
homeport.uscg.mil/newyork.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the waters of the Gowanus
Bay, Red Hook and Buttermilk
Channels, East River, and Flushing Bay
during the effective period.
This RNA will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: The RNA will only
require vessels to transit at No-wake
speed when meeting or over-taking the
Chesapeake 1000 crane barge or other
barges used to carry the gantry cranes
from the Red Hook Container Terminal
to the MTSs on Gowanus and Flushing
Bays. The RNA will only be in effect for
approximately three hours for
operations between Red Hook Container
Terminal and Gowanus Bay and for
approximately seven hours between Red
Hook Container Terminal and Flushing
Bay. Although the RNA would apply to
the entire width of the waterways,
traffic would be allowed to pass through
the RNA at No Wake speed. Before the
activation of the zone, we will issue
maritime advisories widely available to
users of the port.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
11. Indian Tribal Governments
4. Collection of Information
■
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
14. Environment
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
regulated navigation area which
requires vessels to transit at No Wake
speed. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Nov 09, 2012
Jkt 229001
67571
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.l04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0950 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T01–0950 Regulated Navigation
Area; East River, Flushing and Gowanus
Bays, and Red Hook and Buttermilk
Channels; New York, NY.
(a) Regulated area. The following area
is a regulated navigation area: All
navigable waters of the East River,
Flushing and Gowanus Bays, and Red
Hook and Buttermilk Channels, between
the New York City Department of
Sanitation Marine Transfer Station
(MTS) at 40°40′09.48″ N, 073°59′55.75″
W (about 260 yards south of the
Hamilton Avenue Bridge) on Gowanus
Bay and the MTS at 40°46′11.00″ N,
073°50′58.75″ W (about 270 yards south
of the Cape Ruth) on Flushing Bay.
(b) Effective dates and enforcement
periods. This rule is effective and
enforceable with actual notice from
November 1, 2012 through November
30, 2012.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard
who has been designated by the Captain
of the Port Sector New York (COTP), to
act on his or her behalf. The designated
representative may be on an official
patrol vessel or may be on shore and
will communicate with vessels via
VHF–FM radio or loudhailer. In
addition, members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
Official patrol vessel means any Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or
local law enforcement vessels assigned
or approved by the COTP.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.11,
33 CFR 165.13, as well as the following
regulations, apply.
(2) During periods of enforcement, all
vessels must transit at a No-wake speed
to minimize surge when transiting past
the Weeks Marine and Witte Barges
carrying the gantry cranes.
(3) During periods of enforcement, all
persons and vessels given permission to
enter or operate in the regulated area
must comply with the instructions of
the COTP or the designated
representative. Upon being hailed by an
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
67572
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
official patrol vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel must proceed as
directed.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the regulated area
must contact the COTP or the
designated representative via VHF
channel 16 or 718–354–4088 (Sector
New York Vessel Traffic Center) to
obtain permission to do so.
Dated: October 26, 2012.
J.B. McPherson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012–27490 Filed 11–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 280
[Docket ID ED–2010–OII–0003]
RIN 1855–AA07
Magnet Schools Assistance Program
Office of Innovation and
Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
This document adopts as final
a March 2010 interim final rule by
which the Secretary amended the
regulations governing the Magnet
Schools Assistance Program (MSAP) to
provide greater flexibility to school
districts designing MSAP programs for
the FY 2010 competition. The
amendments removed provisions in the
regulations that require districts to use
binary racial classifications and prohibit
the creation of magnet schools that
result in minority group enrollments in
magnet and feeder schools exceeding
the district-wide average of minority
group students. We sought comments on
the amendments because we adopted
them through an interim final rule. We
have reviewed the comments we
received and retain the amendments
without change for competitions going
forward.
DATES: These regulations are effective
December 13, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brittany Beth, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 4W252, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 453–6653 or via email:
brittany.beth@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free at 1–800–877–
8339.
Accessible format: Individuals with
disabilities may obtain this document in
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Nov 09, 2012
Jkt 229001
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
On March
4, 2010, the Department published an
interim final rule (IFR) with a request
for public comment in the Federal
Register (75 FR 9777). The IFR,
applicable only to the FY 2010
competition, removed provisions in the
MSAP regulations at 34 CFR 280.2(b)(2),
280.4(b), and 280.20(g) that required
districts to use binary racial
classifications and prohibited the
creation of magnet schools that result in
minority group enrollments in magnet
and feeder schools exceeding the
district-wide average of minority group
students. The IFR explained that these
changes were necessary to permit MSAP
applicants ‘‘to determine how best to
meet program requirements while also
taking into account intervening
Supreme Court case law, including the
Court’s decision in Parents Involved in
Community Schools v. Seattle School
District No 1 et al., 551 U.S. 701 (2007)
(Parents Involved).’’
In the IFR, the Department also
invited comments on the removal of the
regulatory provisions, noting that any
changes made to the IFR in light of
comments received would govern future
MSAP grant competitions.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Analysis of Comments and Changes
In response to the Secretary’s
invitation in the IFR, three parties
submitted comments on the proposed
regulations. We make no further
amendments to the regulations in
response to the comments; however, an
analysis of the comments follows.
Generally, we do not address
technical and other minor changes or
suggested changes the law does not
authorize the Secretary to make.
Comments: The commenters agreed
with the decision to remove the
provisions of the regulations in light of
the Supreme Court’s decision in Parents
Involved, but they expressed concern
about the use of case-by-case decisionmaking when evaluating proposed
MSAP voluntary desegregation plans.
The commenters requested additional
guidance from the Department about
permissible ways for applicants to
voluntarily reduce minority group
isolation after the Court’s decision in
Parents Involved. The commenters
suggested replacing the removed
provisions with more specific language
in order to assist school districts in
designing legally permissible voluntary
desegregation plans.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Discussion: In the IFR, the
Department removed the definition of
‘‘minority group isolation’’ in 34 CFR
280.4(b). Under the definition, the term
meant, in reference to a school, ‘‘a
condition in which minority group
children constitute more than 50
percent of the enrollment of the school.’’
We removed the definition because it
required the use of only two racial
classifications of students—minority
group and nonminority group students.
In the absence of a definition of
‘‘minority group isolation,’’ the IFR
stated—
the Department will determine on a case-bycase basis whether a district’s voluntary plan
meets the statutory purpose of reducing,
eliminating, or preventing minority group
isolation in its magnet or feeder schools,
considering the unique circumstances in
each district and school. For example, the
Department may consider whether there is a
substantial proportion of students from any
minority group enrolled in a school, looking
at the student enrollment numbers of the
district and the targeted schools
disaggregated by race.
The Department agrees that at the
time of publication of the IFR there was
some confusion for applicants about
whether the case-by-case analysis would
be an effective way to evaluate
voluntary plans under the MSAP. The
Department recognized the need for
additional guidance about ways that
districts can voluntarily reduce minority
group isolation and promote diversity in
school districts in light of Parents
Involved. On December 2, 2011, the
Departments of Education and Justice
jointly issued guidance that explains
how educational institutions can
lawfully pursue voluntary policies to
achieve diversity or avoid racial
isolation within the framework of Titles
IV and VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, the Equal Protection Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, and current case law. The
‘‘Guidance on the Voluntary Use of Race
to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial
Isolation in Elementary and Secondary
Schools’’ (Guidance) is available on the
Department’s Web site at https://
www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/
docs/guidance-ese-201111.pdf.
In light of this Guidance, and based
on the Department’s experience in
awarding FY 2010 grants under the
regulations as amended by the IFR, the
Department has concluded that it is not
necessary to propose provisions to
replace those that were removed by the
IFR. Applicants are encouraged to use
the Guidance when designing voluntary
desegregation plans.
The Department continues to believe
that case-by-case decision-making is
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 13, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67568-67572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27490]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0950]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; East River, Flushing and Gowanus Bays,
and Red Hook and Buttermilk Channels; New York, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary interim rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily establishing a regulated
navigation area (RNA) comprising all waters between the New York City
Department of Sanitation Marine Transfer Stations (MTSs) on Gowanus Bay
and Flushing Bay. While the temporary interim rule is in effect, the
Coast Guard may restrict or prohibit vessel traffic within the RNA to
accommodate the load-out and transit of four gantry cranes that will
pose an imminent hazard to vessels operating in the area.
DATES: This rule is effective with actual notice for purposes of
enforcement from November 1, 2012 through November 30, 2012, and
effective in the Code of Federal Regulations from November 13, 2012
through November 30, 2012. Comments and related material must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before November 30, 2012. Requests
for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on or before
November 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of Docket
Number USCG-2012-0950. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as
being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on
``Open Docket Folder'' on the line associated with this rulemaking. You
may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may submit comments, identified by docket number, using any one
of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
[[Page 67569]]
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Waterways Management Division at Coast
Guard Sector New York, telephone (718) 354-4195, email
Jeff.M.Yunker@uscg.mil or Lieutenant Isaac Slavitt, First Coast Guard
District Waterways Management Division, Boston, MA, telephone (617)
223-8385, email Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
APA Administrative Procedure Act
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MTS New York City Department of Sanitation Marine Transfer Station
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.''
Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8 \1/2\; by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.''
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room
W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553). Section 553(b)
provides that a general notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) must be
published ``unless persons subject thereto are named and either
personally served or otherwise have actual notice thereof in accordance
with law.'' This rule identifies the persons who will be subject to the
RNA regulations: mariners in or seeking to enter a defined area of the
Port of New York and New Jersey between November 1, 2012, and November
30, 2012. Each of these persons will be given actual notice of any
restrictions or prohibitions imposed on them by this rule. Section
553(b)(B) authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking with
respect to this rule because the Coast Guard received the specific
request to establish a no-wake zone around the load out and transits
from the contractor on September 6, 2012. There was insufficient time
and therefore it was impracticable to issue an NPRM and conduct a prior
notice and comment period. This rule is necessary to protect the safety
of both the gantry crane load out and transit crews and the waterway
users operating in the vicinity of the RNA. The proposed movement of
the gantry cranes creates a significant hazard for waterway users and
crane workers. Any delay or cancellation of the ongoing New York City
Department of Sanitation MTS facility upgrades would be contrary to the
public interest as it would delay necessary operations and increase
costs to the public. Additionally, the dynamic nature of the gantry
crane loading and transit operations necessitate that all mariners
navigate at a safe speed within the RNA, as the barge and gantry crane
and construction equipment at the two MTS facilities will change on a
daily basis. In order to address any further public concerns, this rule
is available for public comment until November 30, 2012.
[[Page 67570]]
C. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are determined
to have hazardous conditions and in which vessel traffic can be
regulated in the interest of safety. See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
The offloading and transit of gantry cranes involves large
machinery and construction vessel operations above and in the navigable
waters of the Port of New York and New Jersey. The ongoing operations
are, by their nature, hazardous and pose risks both to recreational and
commercial traffic as well as the construction crews. In order to
mitigate the inherent risks involved in these operations, it is
necessary to control vessel movement through the area.
The purpose of this rule is to ensure the safety of waterway users,
the public, and construction workers for the duration of the gantry
crane load-outs and transits during the effective period. The RNA will
also protect vessels desiring to transit the area by ensuring that
vessels are only permitted to transit at No-wake speed.
D. Discussion of the Interim Rule
The New York City Department of Sanitation is upgrading Marine
Transfer Stations throughout the City to containerized operations. This
upgrade requires installation of gantry cranes at the Gowanus Bay and
Flushing Bay MTS facilities. Four gantry cranes will be delivered to
the Red Hook Container Terminal in Brooklyn, NY on Buttermilk Channel.
Two of these gantry cranes will be delivered by the Cheseapeake 1000 to
the Gowanus Bay MTS on Gowanus Bay, approximately 3.0 nautical miles to
the southeast. The other two gantry cranes will be offloaded onto
barges for transit and offloading to the Flushing Bay MTS on Flushing
Bay, approximately 13.0 nautical miles to the northeast.
The load out and transit of these gantry cranes involves large
machinery and construction vessel operations above and upon the
navigable waters between Gowanus Bay, Red Hook and Buttermilk Channels,
East River, and Flushing Bay. Heavy-lift operations are sensitive to
water movement, and wake from passing vessels could pose significant
risk of injury or death to construction workers. The ongoing operations
are, by their nature, hazardous and pose risks both to recreational and
commercial vessel traffic and the barge and load out crews. In order to
mitigate the inherent risks involved in the construction, it is
necessary to control vessel movement through the area.
This action is intended to restrict vessel traffic on a portion of
the waterways between Gowanus Bay and Flushing Bay in the Port of New
York and New Jersey while gantry cranes are loaded onto barges at Red
Hook Container Terminal on Buttermilk Channel and transit to the MTS
facilities on Gowanus and Flushing Bays.
These operations are tentatively scheduled to take place starting
on November 1, 2012 and lasting several days, but this rule will be
made effective through November 30, 2012 to account for any unforeseen
delays. Vessels will be required to transit at No Wake speed when
meeting or overtaking the vessels carrying these gantry cranes.
The Coast Guard will notify mariners of planned waterway transit
restrictions via Marine Information Broadcasts, Coast Guard Advisory
Notices, and at https://homeport.uscg.mil/newyork.
The Sector New York Captain of the Port will cause notice of
enforcement or suspension of enforcement, of this RNA to be made by all
appropriate means to achieve the widest distribution among the affected
segments of the public. Such means of notification will include, but is
not limited to, Marine Information Broadcasts, Coast Guard Advisory
Notices, and at https://homeport.uscg.mil/newyork.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the waters of the Gowanus Bay, Red Hook and
Buttermilk Channels, East River, and Flushing Bay during the effective
period.
This RNA will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: The RNA
will only require vessels to transit at No-wake speed when meeting or
over-taking the Chesapeake 1000 crane barge or other barges used to
carry the gantry cranes from the Red Hook Container Terminal to the
MTSs on Gowanus and Flushing Bays. The RNA will only be in effect for
approximately three hours for operations between Red Hook Container
Terminal and Gowanus Bay and for approximately seven hours between Red
Hook Container Terminal and Flushing Bay. Although the RNA would apply
to the entire width of the waterways, traffic would be allowed to pass
through the RNA at No Wake speed. Before the activation of the zone, we
will issue maritime advisories widely available to users of the port.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
[[Page 67571]]
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a regulated navigation area which
requires vessels to transit at No Wake speed. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.l04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0950 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0950 Regulated Navigation Area; East River, Flushing and
Gowanus Bays, and Red Hook and Buttermilk Channels; New York, NY.
(a) Regulated area. The following area is a regulated navigation
area: All navigable waters of the East River, Flushing and Gowanus
Bays, and Red Hook and Buttermilk Channels, between the New York City
Department of Sanitation Marine Transfer Station (MTS) at
40[deg]40[min]09.48[sec] N, 073[deg]59[min]55.75[sec] W (about 260
yards south of the Hamilton Avenue Bridge) on Gowanus Bay and the MTS
at 40[deg]46[min]11.00[sec] N, 073[deg]50[min]58.75[sec] W (about 270
yards south of the Cape Ruth) on Flushing Bay.
(b) Effective dates and enforcement periods. This rule is effective
and enforceable with actual notice from November 1, 2012 through
November 30, 2012.
(c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port Sector New York (COTP), to act on
his or her behalf. The designated representative may be on an official
patrol vessel or may be on shore and will communicate with vessels via
VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. In addition, members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators of this regulation.
Official patrol vessel means any Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement vessels assigned or approved
by the COTP.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.11, 33 CFR 165.13, as well as the following regulations, apply.
(2) During periods of enforcement, all vessels must transit at a
No-wake speed to minimize surge when transiting past the Weeks Marine
and Witte Barges carrying the gantry cranes.
(3) During periods of enforcement, all persons and vessels given
permission to enter or operate in the regulated area must comply with
the instructions of the COTP or the designated representative. Upon
being hailed by an
[[Page 67572]]
official patrol vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means,
the operator of a vessel must proceed as directed.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
regulated area must contact the COTP or the designated representative
via VHF channel 16 or 718-354-4088 (Sector New York Vessel Traffic
Center) to obtain permission to do so.
Dated: October 26, 2012.
J.B. McPherson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2012-27490 Filed 11-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P