Texas Regulatory Program, 66574-66577 [2012-27086]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
66574
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Secretary of the Commission and the
intrastate pipeline.
(ii) Protests shall be filed with the
Commission in the form required by
Part 385 of this Chapter including a
detailed statement of the protestor’s
interest in the filing and the specific
reasons and rationale for the objection
and whether the protestor seeks to be an
intervenor.
(5) Effect of protest. If a protest is filed
in accordance with paragraph (g)(4) of
this section, then the intrastate pipeline,
the person who filed the protest, any
intervenors, and staff shall have 30 days
from the deadline for filing protests
established by the Secretary of the
Commission in accordance with
paragraph (g)(3) of this section, to
resolve the protest, and to file a
withdrawal of the protest pursuant to
paragraph (g)(6) of this section. Informal
settlement conferences may be
convened by the Director of the Office
of Energy Market Regulation or his
designee during this 30 day period. If a
protest is not withdrawn or dismissed
by end of that 30 day period, the filing
shall not be deemed approved pursuant
to this paragraph. Within 60 days from
the deadline for filing protests
established by the Secretary of the
Commission in accordance with
paragraph (g)(3) of this section the
Commission will establish procedures
to resolve the proceeding.
(6) Withdrawal of protests. The
protestor may withdraw a protest by
submitting written notice of withdrawal
to the Secretary of the Commission
pursuant to § 385.216 and serving a
copy on the intrastate pipeline, any
intervenors, and any person who has
filed a motion to intervene in the
proceeding.
(7) Amendments or modifications to
tariff record prior to approval. An
intrastate pipeline may file to amend or
modify a tariff record contained in the
initial filing pursuant to the procedures
under this paragraph (g) which has not
yet been approved pursuant to
paragraph (g)(8) of this section. Such
filing will toll the notice period
established in paragraph (g)(3) of this
section and the Secretary of the
Commission will issue a notice
establishing new deadlines for
comments and protests for the entire
filing pursuant to paragraph (g)(3).
(8) Final approval. (i) If no protest is
filed within the time allowed by the
Secretary of the Commission under
paragraph (g)(3) of this section, the
filing by the intrastate pipeline is
approved, effective on the day after time
expires for filing protests unless, during
that time, the intrastate pipeline
withdraws, amends, or modifies its
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:23 Nov 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
filing or the filing is rejected pursuant
to this paragraph.
(ii) If any protest is filed within the
time allowed by the Secretary of the
Commission under paragraph (g)(3) of
this section and is subsequently
withdrawn before the end of the 30-day
reconciliation period provided by
paragraph (g)(5) of this section, the
filing by the intrastate pipeline is
approved effective upon the later of the
day after the deadline for filing protests,
if there are no other protests to the
filing, or the day after the withdrawal of
all protests unless the intrastate pipeline
withdraws, amends, or modifies its
filing or the filing is rejected, prior to
that date.
(9) Periodic rate review. Rates of
pipelines approved by the Commission
pursuant to this paragraph are required
to be periodically reviewed. Any
intrastate pipeline with rates so
approved must file an application for
rate approval under this section on or
before the date five years following the
date it filed the application for
authorization of rates pursuant to this
paragraph. Any Hinshaw pipeline that
has been a granted a blanket certificate
under § 284.224 of this chapter and with
rates approved pursuant to this
paragraph must on or before the date
five years following the date it filed the
application for authorization of the rates
pursuant to this paragraph either file
cost, throughput, revenue and other
data, in the form specified in § 154.313
of this chapter to allow the Commission
to determine whether any change in
rates is required pursuant to 5 of the
Natural Gas Act or an application for
rate authorization pursuant to this
section.
(10) Withdrawal of filing prior to
approval. A pipeline may, pursuant to
paragraph (h) of this section, withdraw
in its entirety a filing made pursuant to
this paragraph (g) that has not been
approved by filing a withdrawal motion
with the Commission. A filing that is
withdrawn will not fulfill the
requirements under paragraph (g)(8) of
this section.
(h) Withdrawal of filing. A pipeline
may withdraw in its entirety a filing
pursuant to this section that has not
been approved by filing a withdrawal
motion with the Commission.
(1) The withdrawal motion must state
that any amounts collected subject to
refund in excess of the rates authorized
the Commission will be refunded with
interest calculated and a refund report
filed with the Commission in
accordance with § 154.501 of this
chapter. The refunds must be made
within 60 days of the date the
withdrawal motion becomes effective.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) The withdrawal motion will
become effective, and the filing will be
deemed withdrawn at the end of 15
days from the date of filing of the
withdrawal motion, if no order
disallowing the motion is issued within
that period. If an answer in opposition
is filed within the 15 day period, the
withdrawal is not effective until an
order accepting the withdrawal is
issued.
[FR Doc. 2012–26748 Filed 11–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 943
[SATS No. TX–065–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–
2012–0019]
Texas Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a
proposed amendment to the Texas
regulatory program (Texas program)
under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). Texas proposes revisions to its
regulations regarding: definitions;
review of permit applications; criteria
for permit approval or denial;
commission review of outstanding
permits; challenge of ownership or
control and applicant/violator system
procedures; identification of interests
and compliance information; mining in
previously mined areas; conditions of
permits; revegetation standards;
cessation orders; alternative
enforcement; application approval and
notice; permit revisions; permit
renewals; transfer, assignment or sale of
permit rights; and requirements for new
permits for persons succeeding to rights
granted under a permit. Texas intends to
revise its program to be no less effective
than the Federal regulations and
improve operational efficiency.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Texas program and
this proposed amendment to that
program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the
procedures that we will follow for the
public hearing, if one is requested.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules
We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4:00
p.m., c.d.t., December 6, 2012. If
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on December 3,
2012. We will accept requests to speak
at a hearing until 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on
November 21, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by SATS No. TX–065–FOR,
by any of the following methods:
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Alfred L.
Clayborne, Director, Tulsa Field Office,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 1645 South 101st East
Avenue, Suite 145, Tulsa, Oklahoma
74128–4629.
• Fax: (918) 581–6419.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
review copies of the Texas program, this
amendment, a listing of any scheduled
public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this
document, you must go to the address
listed below during normal business
hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the amendment by
contacting OSM’s Tulsa Field Office or
going to www.regulations.gov.
Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1645
South 101st East Avenue, Suite 145,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128–4629,
Telephone: (918) 581–6430, Email:
aclayborne@osmre.gov.
DATES:
erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
In addition, you may review a copy of
the amendment during regular business
hours at the following location:
Surface Mining and Reclamation
Division, Railroad Commission of
Texas, 1701 North Congress Avenue,
Capitol Station, P.O. Box 12967,
Austin, Texas 78711–2967,
Telephone: (512) 463–6900.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office. Telephone: (918) 581–
6430. Email: aclayborne@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Texas Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:23 Nov 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
I. Background on the Texas Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * * ; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Texas
program effective February 16, 1980.
You can find background information
on the Texas program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and the conditions of
approval of the Texas program in the
February 27, 1980, Federal Register (45
FR 12998). You can also find later
actions concerning the Texas program
and program amendments at 30 CFR
943.10, 943.15, and 943.16.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By email dated February 14, 2012
(Administrative Record No. TX–701),
Texas sent us an amendment (TX–060–
FOR) to its program under SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). Texas submitted
the proposed amendment in response to
a September 30, 2009, letter
(Administrative Record No. TX–665)
that OSM sent to Texas in accordance
with 30 CFR 732.17(c) with additional
changes submitted on its own initiative.
The proposed rule was published, and
its public comment period and
opportunity for public hearing on the
proposed amendment was announced in
the Federal Register (77 FR 25949) on
May 2, 2012. During our review of the
amendment, we found several sections
that were less effective than their
counterpart Federal regulations. A list of
the concerns was sent to Texas via a
letter dated July 18, 2012
(Administrative Record No. TX–701.04).
By letter dated August 09, 2012
(Administrative Record No. TX–702),
Texas responded to the July 18, 2012,
letter by withdrawing its amendment
(TX–060–FOR) regarding ownership and
control changes.
By letter dated August 09, 2012
(Administrative Record No. TX–702),
Texas sent us a new amendment to its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.). This amendment was a
corrected version of its withdrawn
amendment (TX–060–FOR) as discussed
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66575
in the previous paragraph. Texas
submitted this proposed amendment in
response to a September 30, 2009, letter
(Administrative Record No. TX–665)
that OSM sent to Texas in accordance
with 30 CFR 732.17(c) with additional
changes submitted on its own initiative.
Below is a summary of the changes
proposed by Texas. The full text of the
program amendment is available for you
to read at the locations listed above
under ADDRESSES or at
www.regulations.gov.
Texas proposes to revise its regulation
at 16 Texas Administrative Code (TAC)
at the following sections:
A. § 12.3
Definitions
Texas proposes to modify this section
by revising, adding, or deleting language
for the definitions of Applicant/Violator
System; Control or controller; Knowing
or knowingly; Lands eligible for
remining; Own, owner, or ownership;
Owned or controlled and owns and
controls; Remining; Violation; Violation,
failure, or refusal; Violation notice; and
Willful or willfully.
B. § 12.100
Responsibilities
Texas proposes to remove the word
‘‘renewal’’ from the provision that
places the burden on the applicant to
establish that an application is in
compliance with all the Commission’s
requirements.
C. § 12.116 Identification of Interests
and Compliance Information (Surface
Mining)
Texas proposes to delete language in
this section regarding identification of
interests and compliance information
and replace it with new language
regarding certifying and updating
existing permit information, permit
applicant and operator information,
permit history information, property
interest information, violation
information, and commission actions.
D. § 12.155
Identification of Interests
Texas proposes to delete this section
and incorporate the language into
§ 12.156 for efficiency.
E. § 12.156 Identification of Interest
and Compliance Information
(Underground Mining)
Texas proposes to add language to
this section regarding identification of
interests, specifically: certifying and
updating permit application
information, permit applicant and
operator information, permit history
information, property interest
information, violation information, and
commission actions.
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
66576
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules
F. § 12.206 Mining in Previously Mined
Areas
Texas proposes to add new language
regarding application requirements for
operations on lands eligible for
remining.
G. § 12.215 Review of Permit
Applications
Texas proposes to add language
requiring the entry and updating of data
into AVS. Additionally, language is
being added regarding the review of
permit history, review of compliance
history, and making a permit eligibility
determination based on this
information.
H. § 12.216 Criteria for Permit
Approval or Denial
Texas proposes to add language
stating that permits related to remining
must contain lands eligible for
remining, an identification of potential
environmental and safety problems, and
mitigation plans that address any
potential environmental or safety
problems.
I. § 12.225 Commission Review of
Outstanding Permits
Texas proposes to add language
regarding written findings and
preliminary findings for improvidently
issued permits. Additionally, changes
are proposed regarding permit
suspension and rescission timeframes
and appeal rights.
erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
J. § 12.234 Challenge of Ownership or
Control, Information on Ownership and
Control, and Violations, and Applicant/
Violator System Procedures
Texas proposes to renumber its
§ 12.234 as § 12.235 and add new
language to create a new § 12.234
regarding ownership and control
challenges—specifically—the
applicability, procedures, burden of
proof, written agency decisions, and
post-permit issuance information
requirements.
K. § 12.395 Revegetation: Standards
for Success (Surface Mining) and
§ 12.560 Revegetation: Standards for
Success (Underground Mining)
Texas proposes to delete language in
this section regarding liability periods
and replace it with new language that is
no less effective than the Federal
regulations.
L. § 12.676 Alternative Enforcement
Texas proposes to add new language
regarding alternative enforcement,
specifically for general provisions,
criminal penalties, and civil actions for
relief.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:23 Nov 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
M. § 12.677
Cessation Orders
Texas proposes to add new language
requiring written notification to the
permittee, the operator, and anyone
listed or identified as an owner or
controller of an operation, within 60
days of issuing a cessation order.
N. § 12.221 Conditions of Permits:
Environment, Public Health, and Safety;
§ 12.239 Application Approval and
Notice; § 12.226 Permit revisions;
§ 12.228 Permit Renewals: Completed
Applications; § 12.232 Transfer,
Assignment or Sale of Permit Rights:
Obtaining Approval; and § 12.233
Requirements for New Permits for
Persons Succeeding to Rights Granted
Under a Permit
Texas proposes to make minor,
nonsubstantial reference changes in
these sections.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the State program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they
should be specific, confined to issues
pertinent to the proposed regulations,
and explain the reason for any
recommended change(s). We appreciate
any and all comments, but those most
useful and likely to influence decisions
on the final regulations will be those
that either involve personal experience
or include citations to and analyses of
SMCRA, its legislative history, its
implementing regulations, case law,
other pertinent State or Federal laws or
regulations, technical literature, or other
relevant publications.
We cannot ensure that comments
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) or sent to an address
other than those listed (see ADDRESSES)
will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on November 21, 2012.
If you are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at the
public hearing provide us with a written
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Other Laws and Executive Orders
Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program
amendment to OSM for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require
us to publish a notice in the Federal
Register indicating receipt of the
proposed amendment, its text or a
summary of its terms, and an
opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed
amendment after the close of the public
comment period and determine whether
the amendment should be approved,
approved in part, or not approved. At
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules
that time, we will also make the
determinations and certifications
required by the various laws and
executive orders governing the
rulemaking process and include them in
the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: August 16, 2012.
Ervin J. Barchenger,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
[FR Doc. 2012–27086 Filed 11–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
RIN 0648–XC165
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
Trawl Rationalization Program; Notice
of Non-Whiting At-Sea Processing
Prohibition Exemption
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of
exemptions to the non-whiting at-sea
processing prohibition.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces the receipt
of applications for, and the issuance of,
exemptions to the prohibition of at-sea
processing for non-whiting groundfish
caught in the Shorebased Individual
Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program, a
prohibition implemented as part of the
trawl rationalization program.
erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:23 Nov 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jamie Goen, phone: 206–526–4656, fax:
206–526–6736, and email jamie.goen@
noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This proposed rule is accessible via
the Internet at the Office of the Federal
Register’s Web site at
https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.
html. Background information and
documents are available at the Pacific
Fishery Management Council’s Web site
at https://www.pcouncil.org/.
Background
In January 2011, NMFS implemented
a trawl rationalization program, a catch
share program, for the Pacific coast
groundfish fishery’s trawl fleet. The
trawl rationalization program consists of
an IFQ program for the shorebased trawl
fleet (including whiting and nonwhiting fisheries); and cooperative
(coop) programs for the at-sea
mothership and catcher/processor trawl
fleets (whiting only).
The Shorebased IFQ Program includes
a prohibition on processing non-whiting
groundfish at sea, as specified in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50
CFR 660.112(b)(1)(xii) and implemented
through a final rule published in the
Federal Register on December 15, 2010
(75 FR 78344). The prohibition was
implemented to ensure that shoreside
processing plants would continue to
have access to groundfish landed in the
Shorebased IFQ Program. The preamble
to the proposed rule dated August 31,
2010 (75 FR 53380) further described
the prohibition on processing at sea in
the Shorebased IFQ Program.
Over 2011, the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
responded to public testimony and
decided it had not intended to
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
66577
negatively impact any at-sea nonwhiting processing operations that
existed prior to announcement of the
prohibition on processing at sea in the
Shorebased IFQ Program. Therefore, the
Council recommended and NMFS
implemented an exemption from the
prohibition on processing non-whiting
groundfish at sea in the Shorebased IFQ
Program through a final rule published
on December 1, 2011 (76 FR 774725).
For more background on the exemption,
see the preamble to the proposed rule
published on September 2, 2011 (76 FR
54888).
With the December 1, 2011 final rule
(also called the trawl rationalization
program improvement and
enhancement (PIE) rule), NMFS
implemented regulations providing a
one-time opportunity for vessels to
apply for an exemption from the
prohibition on processing non-whiting
groundfish at-sea in the Shorebased IFQ
Program. Between January and March of
2012, NMFS completed the application
and review process for an exemption
from the prohibition, as provided for in
Federal regulations at § 660.25(b)(6)(ii).
Effective March 16, 2012, two vessels
qualified for the exemption: F/V LAST
STRAW and F/V MISS LEONA. The
non-whiting at-sea processing
exemption is associated with those
specific vessels, not with the vessel
owner’s limited entry permit, and may
not be transferred to any other vessel,
vessel owner, or permit owner for any
reason.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 1, 2012.
Lindsay Fullenkamp,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–27070 Filed 11–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM
06NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 6, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66574-66577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27086]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 943
[SATS No. TX-065-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2012-0019]
Texas Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Texas
regulatory program (Texas program) under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Texas proposes revisions to
its regulations regarding: definitions; review of permit applications;
criteria for permit approval or denial; commission review of
outstanding permits; challenge of ownership or control and applicant/
violator system procedures; identification of interests and compliance
information; mining in previously mined areas; conditions of permits;
revegetation standards; cessation orders; alternative enforcement;
application approval and notice; permit revisions; permit renewals;
transfer, assignment or sale of permit rights; and requirements for new
permits for persons succeeding to rights granted under a permit. Texas
intends to revise its program to be no less effective than the Federal
regulations and improve operational efficiency.
This document gives the times and locations that the Texas program
and this proposed amendment to that program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for
the public hearing, if one is requested.
[[Page 66575]]
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4:00
p.m., c.d.t., December 6, 2012. If requested, we will hold a public
hearing on the amendment on December 3, 2012. We will accept requests
to speak at a hearing until 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on November 21, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by SATS No. TX-065-FOR,
by any of the following methods:
Mail/Hand Delivery: Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
1645 South 101st East Avenue, Suite 145, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128-4629.
Fax: (918) 581-6419.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking
process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to review copies of the Texas
program, this amendment, a listing of any scheduled public hearings,
and all written comments received in response to this document, you
must go to the address listed below during normal business hours,
Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may receive one free
copy of the amendment by contacting OSM's Tulsa Field Office or going
to www.regulations.gov.
Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa Field Office, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1645 South 101st East Avenue, Suite
145, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128-4629, Telephone: (918) 581-6430, Email:
aclayborne@osmre.gov.
In addition, you may review a copy of the amendment during regular
business hours at the following location:
Surface Mining and Reclamation Division, Railroad Commission of Texas,
1701 North Congress Avenue, Capitol Station, P.O. Box 12967, Austin,
Texas 78711-2967, Telephone: (512) 463-6900.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office. Telephone: (918) 581-6430. Email: aclayborne@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Texas Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Texas Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of this Act * * * ; and rules and
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Texas program effective February 16, 1980. You can find background
information on the Texas program, including the Secretary's findings,
the disposition of comments, and the conditions of approval of the
Texas program in the February 27, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 12998).
You can also find later actions concerning the Texas program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 943.10, 943.15, and 943.16.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By email dated February 14, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX-
701), Texas sent us an amendment (TX-060-FOR) to its program under
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). Texas submitted the proposed amendment
in response to a September 30, 2009, letter (Administrative Record No.
TX-665) that OSM sent to Texas in accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c) with
additional changes submitted on its own initiative. The proposed rule
was published, and its public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on the proposed amendment was announced in the Federal Register
(77 FR 25949) on May 2, 2012. During our review of the amendment, we
found several sections that were less effective than their counterpart
Federal regulations. A list of the concerns was sent to Texas via a
letter dated July 18, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX-701.04). By
letter dated August 09, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX-702), Texas
responded to the July 18, 2012, letter by withdrawing its amendment
(TX-060-FOR) regarding ownership and control changes.
By letter dated August 09, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX-702),
Texas sent us a new amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1201 et seq.). This amendment was a corrected version of its withdrawn
amendment (TX-060-FOR) as discussed in the previous paragraph. Texas
submitted this proposed amendment in response to a September 30, 2009,
letter (Administrative Record No. TX-665) that OSM sent to Texas in
accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c) with additional changes submitted on
its own initiative. Below is a summary of the changes proposed by
Texas. The full text of the program amendment is available for you to
read at the locations listed above under ADDRESSES or at
www.regulations.gov.
Texas proposes to revise its regulation at 16 Texas Administrative
Code (TAC) at the following sections:
A. Sec. 12.3 Definitions
Texas proposes to modify this section by revising, adding, or
deleting language for the definitions of Applicant/Violator System;
Control or controller; Knowing or knowingly; Lands eligible for
remining; Own, owner, or ownership; Owned or controlled and owns and
controls; Remining; Violation; Violation, failure, or refusal;
Violation notice; and Willful or willfully.
B. Sec. 12.100 Responsibilities
Texas proposes to remove the word ``renewal'' from the provision
that places the burden on the applicant to establish that an
application is in compliance with all the Commission's requirements.
C. Sec. 12.116 Identification of Interests and Compliance Information
(Surface Mining)
Texas proposes to delete language in this section regarding
identification of interests and compliance information and replace it
with new language regarding certifying and updating existing permit
information, permit applicant and operator information, permit history
information, property interest information, violation information, and
commission actions.
D. Sec. 12.155 Identification of Interests
Texas proposes to delete this section and incorporate the language
into Sec. 12.156 for efficiency.
E. Sec. 12.156 Identification of Interest and Compliance Information
(Underground Mining)
Texas proposes to add language to this section regarding
identification of interests, specifically: certifying and updating
permit application information, permit applicant and operator
information, permit history information, property interest information,
violation information, and commission actions.
[[Page 66576]]
F. Sec. 12.206 Mining in Previously Mined Areas
Texas proposes to add new language regarding application
requirements for operations on lands eligible for remining.
G. Sec. 12.215 Review of Permit Applications
Texas proposes to add language requiring the entry and updating of
data into AVS. Additionally, language is being added regarding the
review of permit history, review of compliance history, and making a
permit eligibility determination based on this information.
H. Sec. 12.216 Criteria for Permit Approval or Denial
Texas proposes to add language stating that permits related to
remining must contain lands eligible for remining, an identification of
potential environmental and safety problems, and mitigation plans that
address any potential environmental or safety problems.
I. Sec. 12.225 Commission Review of Outstanding Permits
Texas proposes to add language regarding written findings and
preliminary findings for improvidently issued permits. Additionally,
changes are proposed regarding permit suspension and rescission
timeframes and appeal rights.
J. Sec. 12.234 Challenge of Ownership or Control, Information on
Ownership and Control, and Violations, and Applicant/Violator System
Procedures
Texas proposes to renumber its Sec. 12.234 as Sec. 12.235 and add
new language to create a new Sec. 12.234 regarding ownership and
control challenges--specifically--the applicability, procedures, burden
of proof, written agency decisions, and post-permit issuance
information requirements.
K. Sec. 12.395 Revegetation: Standards for Success (Surface Mining)
and Sec. 12.560 Revegetation: Standards for Success (Underground
Mining)
Texas proposes to delete language in this section regarding
liability periods and replace it with new language that is no less
effective than the Federal regulations.
L. Sec. 12.676 Alternative Enforcement
Texas proposes to add new language regarding alternative
enforcement, specifically for general provisions, criminal penalties,
and civil actions for relief.
M. Sec. 12.677 Cessation Orders
Texas proposes to add new language requiring written notification
to the permittee, the operator, and anyone listed or identified as an
owner or controller of an operation, within 60 days of issuing a
cessation order.
N. Sec. 12.221 Conditions of Permits: Environment, Public Health, and
Safety; Sec. 12.239 Application Approval and Notice; Sec. 12.226
Permit revisions; Sec. 12.228 Permit Renewals: Completed Applications;
Sec. 12.232 Transfer, Assignment or Sale of Permit Rights: Obtaining
Approval; and Sec. 12.233 Requirements for New Permits for Persons
Succeeding to Rights Granted Under a Permit
Texas proposes to make minor, nonsubstantial reference changes in
these sections.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the State program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they should be specific, confined
to issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason
for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but
those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history,
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent State or
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant
publications.
We cannot ensure that comments received after the close of the
comment period (see DATES) or sent to an address other than those
listed (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment including your personal identifying
information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on
November 21, 2012. If you are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and
time of the hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no
one requests an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Other Laws and Executive Orders Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program amendment to OSM for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require us to publish a notice in the
Federal Register indicating receipt of the proposed amendment, its text
or a summary of its terms, and an opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed amendment after the close of the
public comment period and determine whether the amendment should be
approved, approved in part, or not approved. At
[[Page 66577]]
that time, we will also make the determinations and certifications
required by the various laws and executive orders governing the
rulemaking process and include them in the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: August 16, 2012.
Ervin J. Barchenger,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-27086 Filed 11-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P