Texas Regulatory Program, 66574-66577 [2012-27086]

Download as PDF erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 66574 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules Secretary of the Commission and the intrastate pipeline. (ii) Protests shall be filed with the Commission in the form required by Part 385 of this Chapter including a detailed statement of the protestor’s interest in the filing and the specific reasons and rationale for the objection and whether the protestor seeks to be an intervenor. (5) Effect of protest. If a protest is filed in accordance with paragraph (g)(4) of this section, then the intrastate pipeline, the person who filed the protest, any intervenors, and staff shall have 30 days from the deadline for filing protests established by the Secretary of the Commission in accordance with paragraph (g)(3) of this section, to resolve the protest, and to file a withdrawal of the protest pursuant to paragraph (g)(6) of this section. Informal settlement conferences may be convened by the Director of the Office of Energy Market Regulation or his designee during this 30 day period. If a protest is not withdrawn or dismissed by end of that 30 day period, the filing shall not be deemed approved pursuant to this paragraph. Within 60 days from the deadline for filing protests established by the Secretary of the Commission in accordance with paragraph (g)(3) of this section the Commission will establish procedures to resolve the proceeding. (6) Withdrawal of protests. The protestor may withdraw a protest by submitting written notice of withdrawal to the Secretary of the Commission pursuant to § 385.216 and serving a copy on the intrastate pipeline, any intervenors, and any person who has filed a motion to intervene in the proceeding. (7) Amendments or modifications to tariff record prior to approval. An intrastate pipeline may file to amend or modify a tariff record contained in the initial filing pursuant to the procedures under this paragraph (g) which has not yet been approved pursuant to paragraph (g)(8) of this section. Such filing will toll the notice period established in paragraph (g)(3) of this section and the Secretary of the Commission will issue a notice establishing new deadlines for comments and protests for the entire filing pursuant to paragraph (g)(3). (8) Final approval. (i) If no protest is filed within the time allowed by the Secretary of the Commission under paragraph (g)(3) of this section, the filing by the intrastate pipeline is approved, effective on the day after time expires for filing protests unless, during that time, the intrastate pipeline withdraws, amends, or modifies its VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:23 Nov 05, 2012 Jkt 229001 filing or the filing is rejected pursuant to this paragraph. (ii) If any protest is filed within the time allowed by the Secretary of the Commission under paragraph (g)(3) of this section and is subsequently withdrawn before the end of the 30-day reconciliation period provided by paragraph (g)(5) of this section, the filing by the intrastate pipeline is approved effective upon the later of the day after the deadline for filing protests, if there are no other protests to the filing, or the day after the withdrawal of all protests unless the intrastate pipeline withdraws, amends, or modifies its filing or the filing is rejected, prior to that date. (9) Periodic rate review. Rates of pipelines approved by the Commission pursuant to this paragraph are required to be periodically reviewed. Any intrastate pipeline with rates so approved must file an application for rate approval under this section on or before the date five years following the date it filed the application for authorization of rates pursuant to this paragraph. Any Hinshaw pipeline that has been a granted a blanket certificate under § 284.224 of this chapter and with rates approved pursuant to this paragraph must on or before the date five years following the date it filed the application for authorization of the rates pursuant to this paragraph either file cost, throughput, revenue and other data, in the form specified in § 154.313 of this chapter to allow the Commission to determine whether any change in rates is required pursuant to 5 of the Natural Gas Act or an application for rate authorization pursuant to this section. (10) Withdrawal of filing prior to approval. A pipeline may, pursuant to paragraph (h) of this section, withdraw in its entirety a filing made pursuant to this paragraph (g) that has not been approved by filing a withdrawal motion with the Commission. A filing that is withdrawn will not fulfill the requirements under paragraph (g)(8) of this section. (h) Withdrawal of filing. A pipeline may withdraw in its entirety a filing pursuant to this section that has not been approved by filing a withdrawal motion with the Commission. (1) The withdrawal motion must state that any amounts collected subject to refund in excess of the rates authorized the Commission will be refunded with interest calculated and a refund report filed with the Commission in accordance with § 154.501 of this chapter. The refunds must be made within 60 days of the date the withdrawal motion becomes effective. PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (2) The withdrawal motion will become effective, and the filing will be deemed withdrawn at the end of 15 days from the date of filing of the withdrawal motion, if no order disallowing the motion is issued within that period. If an answer in opposition is filed within the 15 day period, the withdrawal is not effective until an order accepting the withdrawal is issued. [FR Doc. 2012–26748 Filed 11–5–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement 30 CFR Part 943 [SATS No. TX–065–FOR; Docket ID: OSM– 2012–0019] Texas Regulatory Program Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public hearing on proposed amendment. AGENCY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Texas regulatory program (Texas program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Texas proposes revisions to its regulations regarding: definitions; review of permit applications; criteria for permit approval or denial; commission review of outstanding permits; challenge of ownership or control and applicant/violator system procedures; identification of interests and compliance information; mining in previously mined areas; conditions of permits; revegetation standards; cessation orders; alternative enforcement; application approval and notice; permit revisions; permit renewals; transfer, assignment or sale of permit rights; and requirements for new permits for persons succeeding to rights granted under a permit. Texas intends to revise its program to be no less effective than the Federal regulations and improve operational efficiency. This document gives the times and locations that the Texas program and this proposed amendment to that program are available for your inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for the public hearing, if one is requested. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM 06NOP1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4:00 p.m., c.d.t., December 6, 2012. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on the amendment on December 3, 2012. We will accept requests to speak at a hearing until 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on November 21, 2012. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by SATS No. TX–065–FOR, by any of the following methods: • Mail/Hand Delivery: Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1645 South 101st East Avenue, Suite 145, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128–4629. • Fax: (918) 581–6419. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’ heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Docket: For access to the docket to review copies of the Texas program, this amendment, a listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments received in response to this document, you must go to the address listed below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting OSM’s Tulsa Field Office or going to www.regulations.gov. Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1645 South 101st East Avenue, Suite 145, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128–4629, Telephone: (918) 581–6430, Email: aclayborne@osmre.gov. DATES: erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 In addition, you may review a copy of the amendment during regular business hours at the following location: Surface Mining and Reclamation Division, Railroad Commission of Texas, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Capitol Station, P.O. Box 12967, Austin, Texas 78711–2967, Telephone: (512) 463–6900. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa Field Office. Telephone: (918) 581– 6430. Email: aclayborne@osmre.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background on the Texas Program II. Description of the Proposed Amendment III. Public Comment Procedures IV. Procedural Determinations VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:23 Nov 05, 2012 Jkt 229001 I. Background on the Texas Program Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that its program includes, among other things, ‘‘a State law which provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in accordance with the requirements of this Act * * * ; and rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved the Texas program effective February 16, 1980. You can find background information on the Texas program, including the Secretary’s findings, the disposition of comments, and the conditions of approval of the Texas program in the February 27, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 12998). You can also find later actions concerning the Texas program and program amendments at 30 CFR 943.10, 943.15, and 943.16. II. Description of the Proposed Amendment By email dated February 14, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX–701), Texas sent us an amendment (TX–060– FOR) to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). Texas submitted the proposed amendment in response to a September 30, 2009, letter (Administrative Record No. TX–665) that OSM sent to Texas in accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c) with additional changes submitted on its own initiative. The proposed rule was published, and its public comment period and opportunity for public hearing on the proposed amendment was announced in the Federal Register (77 FR 25949) on May 2, 2012. During our review of the amendment, we found several sections that were less effective than their counterpart Federal regulations. A list of the concerns was sent to Texas via a letter dated July 18, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX–701.04). By letter dated August 09, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX–702), Texas responded to the July 18, 2012, letter by withdrawing its amendment (TX–060–FOR) regarding ownership and control changes. By letter dated August 09, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX–702), Texas sent us a new amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). This amendment was a corrected version of its withdrawn amendment (TX–060–FOR) as discussed PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 66575 in the previous paragraph. Texas submitted this proposed amendment in response to a September 30, 2009, letter (Administrative Record No. TX–665) that OSM sent to Texas in accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c) with additional changes submitted on its own initiative. Below is a summary of the changes proposed by Texas. The full text of the program amendment is available for you to read at the locations listed above under ADDRESSES or at www.regulations.gov. Texas proposes to revise its regulation at 16 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) at the following sections: A. § 12.3 Definitions Texas proposes to modify this section by revising, adding, or deleting language for the definitions of Applicant/Violator System; Control or controller; Knowing or knowingly; Lands eligible for remining; Own, owner, or ownership; Owned or controlled and owns and controls; Remining; Violation; Violation, failure, or refusal; Violation notice; and Willful or willfully. B. § 12.100 Responsibilities Texas proposes to remove the word ‘‘renewal’’ from the provision that places the burden on the applicant to establish that an application is in compliance with all the Commission’s requirements. C. § 12.116 Identification of Interests and Compliance Information (Surface Mining) Texas proposes to delete language in this section regarding identification of interests and compliance information and replace it with new language regarding certifying and updating existing permit information, permit applicant and operator information, permit history information, property interest information, violation information, and commission actions. D. § 12.155 Identification of Interests Texas proposes to delete this section and incorporate the language into § 12.156 for efficiency. E. § 12.156 Identification of Interest and Compliance Information (Underground Mining) Texas proposes to add language to this section regarding identification of interests, specifically: certifying and updating permit application information, permit applicant and operator information, permit history information, property interest information, violation information, and commission actions. E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM 06NOP1 66576 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules F. § 12.206 Mining in Previously Mined Areas Texas proposes to add new language regarding application requirements for operations on lands eligible for remining. G. § 12.215 Review of Permit Applications Texas proposes to add language requiring the entry and updating of data into AVS. Additionally, language is being added regarding the review of permit history, review of compliance history, and making a permit eligibility determination based on this information. H. § 12.216 Criteria for Permit Approval or Denial Texas proposes to add language stating that permits related to remining must contain lands eligible for remining, an identification of potential environmental and safety problems, and mitigation plans that address any potential environmental or safety problems. I. § 12.225 Commission Review of Outstanding Permits Texas proposes to add language regarding written findings and preliminary findings for improvidently issued permits. Additionally, changes are proposed regarding permit suspension and rescission timeframes and appeal rights. erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 J. § 12.234 Challenge of Ownership or Control, Information on Ownership and Control, and Violations, and Applicant/ Violator System Procedures Texas proposes to renumber its § 12.234 as § 12.235 and add new language to create a new § 12.234 regarding ownership and control challenges—specifically—the applicability, procedures, burden of proof, written agency decisions, and post-permit issuance information requirements. K. § 12.395 Revegetation: Standards for Success (Surface Mining) and § 12.560 Revegetation: Standards for Success (Underground Mining) Texas proposes to delete language in this section regarding liability periods and replace it with new language that is no less effective than the Federal regulations. L. § 12.676 Alternative Enforcement Texas proposes to add new language regarding alternative enforcement, specifically for general provisions, criminal penalties, and civil actions for relief. VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:23 Nov 05, 2012 Jkt 229001 M. § 12.677 Cessation Orders Texas proposes to add new language requiring written notification to the permittee, the operator, and anyone listed or identified as an owner or controller of an operation, within 60 days of issuing a cessation order. N. § 12.221 Conditions of Permits: Environment, Public Health, and Safety; § 12.239 Application Approval and Notice; § 12.226 Permit revisions; § 12.228 Permit Renewals: Completed Applications; § 12.232 Transfer, Assignment or Sale of Permit Rights: Obtaining Approval; and § 12.233 Requirements for New Permits for Persons Succeeding to Rights Granted Under a Permit Texas proposes to make minor, nonsubstantial reference changes in these sections. III. Public Comment Procedures Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it will become part of the State program. Electronic or Written Comments If you submit written comments, they should be specific, confined to issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history, its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent State or Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant publications. We cannot ensure that comments received after the close of the comment period (see DATES) or sent to an address other than those listed (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for this rulemaking and considered. Public Availability of Comments Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Public Hearing If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on November 21, 2012. If you are disabled and need reasonable accommodations to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing. To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in the audience who wish to speak, have been heard. Public Meeting If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record. IV. Procedural Determinations Executive Order 12866—Regulatory Planning and Review This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866. Other Laws and Executive Orders Affecting Rulemaking When a State submits a program amendment to OSM for review, our regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require us to publish a notice in the Federal Register indicating receipt of the proposed amendment, its text or a summary of its terms, and an opportunity for public comment. We conclude our review of the proposed amendment after the close of the public comment period and determine whether the amendment should be approved, approved in part, or not approved. At E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM 06NOP1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Proposed Rules that time, we will also make the determinations and certifications required by the various laws and executive orders governing the rulemaking process and include them in the final rule. List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943 Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining. Dated: August 16, 2012. Ervin J. Barchenger, Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region. [FR Doc. 2012–27086 Filed 11–5–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 660 RIN 0648–XC165 Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Trawl Rationalization Program; Notice of Non-Whiting At-Sea Processing Prohibition Exemption National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of availability of exemptions to the non-whiting at-sea processing prohibition. AGENCY: NMFS announces the receipt of applications for, and the issuance of, exemptions to the prohibition of at-sea processing for non-whiting groundfish caught in the Shorebased Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program, a prohibition implemented as part of the trawl rationalization program. erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:23 Nov 05, 2012 Jkt 229001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Goen, phone: 206–526–4656, fax: 206–526–6736, and email jamie.goen@ noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Access This proposed rule is accessible via the Internet at the Office of the Federal Register’s Web site at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index. html. Background information and documents are available at the Pacific Fishery Management Council’s Web site at https://www.pcouncil.org/. Background In January 2011, NMFS implemented a trawl rationalization program, a catch share program, for the Pacific coast groundfish fishery’s trawl fleet. The trawl rationalization program consists of an IFQ program for the shorebased trawl fleet (including whiting and nonwhiting fisheries); and cooperative (coop) programs for the at-sea mothership and catcher/processor trawl fleets (whiting only). The Shorebased IFQ Program includes a prohibition on processing non-whiting groundfish at sea, as specified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 660.112(b)(1)(xii) and implemented through a final rule published in the Federal Register on December 15, 2010 (75 FR 78344). The prohibition was implemented to ensure that shoreside processing plants would continue to have access to groundfish landed in the Shorebased IFQ Program. The preamble to the proposed rule dated August 31, 2010 (75 FR 53380) further described the prohibition on processing at sea in the Shorebased IFQ Program. Over 2011, the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) responded to public testimony and decided it had not intended to PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 66577 negatively impact any at-sea nonwhiting processing operations that existed prior to announcement of the prohibition on processing at sea in the Shorebased IFQ Program. Therefore, the Council recommended and NMFS implemented an exemption from the prohibition on processing non-whiting groundfish at sea in the Shorebased IFQ Program through a final rule published on December 1, 2011 (76 FR 774725). For more background on the exemption, see the preamble to the proposed rule published on September 2, 2011 (76 FR 54888). With the December 1, 2011 final rule (also called the trawl rationalization program improvement and enhancement (PIE) rule), NMFS implemented regulations providing a one-time opportunity for vessels to apply for an exemption from the prohibition on processing non-whiting groundfish at-sea in the Shorebased IFQ Program. Between January and March of 2012, NMFS completed the application and review process for an exemption from the prohibition, as provided for in Federal regulations at § 660.25(b)(6)(ii). Effective March 16, 2012, two vessels qualified for the exemption: F/V LAST STRAW and F/V MISS LEONA. The non-whiting at-sea processing exemption is associated with those specific vessels, not with the vessel owner’s limited entry permit, and may not be transferred to any other vessel, vessel owner, or permit owner for any reason. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: November 1, 2012. Lindsay Fullenkamp, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2012–27070 Filed 11–5–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P E:\FR\FM\06NOP1.SGM 06NOP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 6, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66574-66577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27086]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 943

[SATS No. TX-065-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2012-0019]


Texas Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public 
hearing on proposed amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement 
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Texas 
regulatory program (Texas program) under the Surface Mining Control and 
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Texas proposes revisions to 
its regulations regarding: definitions; review of permit applications; 
criteria for permit approval or denial; commission review of 
outstanding permits; challenge of ownership or control and applicant/
violator system procedures; identification of interests and compliance 
information; mining in previously mined areas; conditions of permits; 
revegetation standards; cessation orders; alternative enforcement; 
application approval and notice; permit revisions; permit renewals; 
transfer, assignment or sale of permit rights; and requirements for new 
permits for persons succeeding to rights granted under a permit. Texas 
intends to revise its program to be no less effective than the Federal 
regulations and improve operational efficiency.
    This document gives the times and locations that the Texas program 
and this proposed amendment to that program are available for your 
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written 
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for 
the public hearing, if one is requested.

[[Page 66575]]


DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4:00 
p.m., c.d.t., December 6, 2012. If requested, we will hold a public 
hearing on the amendment on December 3, 2012. We will accept requests 
to speak at a hearing until 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on November 21, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by SATS No. TX-065-FOR, 
by any of the following methods:
     Mail/Hand Delivery: Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa 
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 
1645 South 101st East Avenue, Suite 145, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128-4629.
     Fax: (918) 581-6419.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow 
the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on 
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking 
process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures'' heading of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
    Docket: For access to the docket to review copies of the Texas 
program, this amendment, a listing of any scheduled public hearings, 
and all written comments received in response to this document, you 
must go to the address listed below during normal business hours, 
Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may receive one free 
copy of the amendment by contacting OSM's Tulsa Field Office or going 
to www.regulations.gov.

Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa Field Office, Office of Surface 
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1645 South 101st East Avenue, Suite 
145, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128-4629, Telephone: (918) 581-6430, Email: 
aclayborne@osmre.gov.

    In addition, you may review a copy of the amendment during regular 
business hours at the following location:

Surface Mining and Reclamation Division, Railroad Commission of Texas, 
1701 North Congress Avenue, Capitol Station, P.O. Box 12967, Austin, 
Texas 78711-2967, Telephone: (512) 463-6900.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa 
Field Office. Telephone: (918) 581-6430. Email: aclayborne@osmre.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Texas Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations

I. Background on the Texas Program

    Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the 
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that 
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides 
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in 
accordance with the requirements of this Act * * * ; and rules and 
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary 
pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis 
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved 
the Texas program effective February 16, 1980. You can find background 
information on the Texas program, including the Secretary's findings, 
the disposition of comments, and the conditions of approval of the 
Texas program in the February 27, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 12998). 
You can also find later actions concerning the Texas program and 
program amendments at 30 CFR 943.10, 943.15, and 943.16.

II. Description of the Proposed Amendment

    By email dated February 14, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX-
701), Texas sent us an amendment (TX-060-FOR) to its program under 
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). Texas submitted the proposed amendment 
in response to a September 30, 2009, letter (Administrative Record No. 
TX-665) that OSM sent to Texas in accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c) with 
additional changes submitted on its own initiative. The proposed rule 
was published, and its public comment period and opportunity for public 
hearing on the proposed amendment was announced in the Federal Register 
(77 FR 25949) on May 2, 2012. During our review of the amendment, we 
found several sections that were less effective than their counterpart 
Federal regulations. A list of the concerns was sent to Texas via a 
letter dated July 18, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX-701.04). By 
letter dated August 09, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX-702), Texas 
responded to the July 18, 2012, letter by withdrawing its amendment 
(TX-060-FOR) regarding ownership and control changes.
    By letter dated August 09, 2012 (Administrative Record No. TX-702), 
Texas sent us a new amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 
1201 et seq.). This amendment was a corrected version of its withdrawn 
amendment (TX-060-FOR) as discussed in the previous paragraph. Texas 
submitted this proposed amendment in response to a September 30, 2009, 
letter (Administrative Record No. TX-665) that OSM sent to Texas in 
accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c) with additional changes submitted on 
its own initiative. Below is a summary of the changes proposed by 
Texas. The full text of the program amendment is available for you to 
read at the locations listed above under ADDRESSES or at 
www.regulations.gov.
    Texas proposes to revise its regulation at 16 Texas Administrative 
Code (TAC) at the following sections:

A. Sec.  12.3 Definitions

    Texas proposes to modify this section by revising, adding, or 
deleting language for the definitions of Applicant/Violator System; 
Control or controller; Knowing or knowingly; Lands eligible for 
remining; Own, owner, or ownership; Owned or controlled and owns and 
controls; Remining; Violation; Violation, failure, or refusal; 
Violation notice; and Willful or willfully.

B. Sec.  12.100 Responsibilities

    Texas proposes to remove the word ``renewal'' from the provision 
that places the burden on the applicant to establish that an 
application is in compliance with all the Commission's requirements.

C. Sec.  12.116 Identification of Interests and Compliance Information 
(Surface Mining)

    Texas proposes to delete language in this section regarding 
identification of interests and compliance information and replace it 
with new language regarding certifying and updating existing permit 
information, permit applicant and operator information, permit history 
information, property interest information, violation information, and 
commission actions.

D. Sec.  12.155 Identification of Interests

    Texas proposes to delete this section and incorporate the language 
into Sec.  12.156 for efficiency.

E. Sec.  12.156 Identification of Interest and Compliance Information 
(Underground Mining)

    Texas proposes to add language to this section regarding 
identification of interests, specifically: certifying and updating 
permit application information, permit applicant and operator 
information, permit history information, property interest information, 
violation information, and commission actions.

[[Page 66576]]

F. Sec.  12.206 Mining in Previously Mined Areas

    Texas proposes to add new language regarding application 
requirements for operations on lands eligible for remining.

G. Sec.  12.215 Review of Permit Applications

    Texas proposes to add language requiring the entry and updating of 
data into AVS. Additionally, language is being added regarding the 
review of permit history, review of compliance history, and making a 
permit eligibility determination based on this information.

H. Sec.  12.216 Criteria for Permit Approval or Denial

    Texas proposes to add language stating that permits related to 
remining must contain lands eligible for remining, an identification of 
potential environmental and safety problems, and mitigation plans that 
address any potential environmental or safety problems.

I. Sec.  12.225 Commission Review of Outstanding Permits

    Texas proposes to add language regarding written findings and 
preliminary findings for improvidently issued permits. Additionally, 
changes are proposed regarding permit suspension and rescission 
timeframes and appeal rights.

J. Sec.  12.234 Challenge of Ownership or Control, Information on 
Ownership and Control, and Violations, and Applicant/Violator System 
Procedures

    Texas proposes to renumber its Sec.  12.234 as Sec.  12.235 and add 
new language to create a new Sec.  12.234 regarding ownership and 
control challenges--specifically--the applicability, procedures, burden 
of proof, written agency decisions, and post-permit issuance 
information requirements.

K. Sec.  12.395 Revegetation: Standards for Success (Surface Mining) 
and Sec.  12.560 Revegetation: Standards for Success (Underground 
Mining)

    Texas proposes to delete language in this section regarding 
liability periods and replace it with new language that is no less 
effective than the Federal regulations.

L. Sec.  12.676 Alternative Enforcement

    Texas proposes to add new language regarding alternative 
enforcement, specifically for general provisions, criminal penalties, 
and civil actions for relief.

M. Sec.  12.677 Cessation Orders

    Texas proposes to add new language requiring written notification 
to the permittee, the operator, and anyone listed or identified as an 
owner or controller of an operation, within 60 days of issuing a 
cessation order.

N. Sec.  12.221 Conditions of Permits: Environment, Public Health, and 
Safety; Sec.  12.239 Application Approval and Notice; Sec.  12.226 
Permit revisions; Sec.  12.228 Permit Renewals: Completed Applications; 
Sec.  12.232 Transfer, Assignment or Sale of Permit Rights: Obtaining 
Approval; and Sec.  12.233 Requirements for New Permits for Persons 
Succeeding to Rights Granted Under a Permit

    Texas proposes to make minor, nonsubstantial reference changes in 
these sections.

III. Public Comment Procedures

    Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your 
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program 
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it 
will become part of the State program.

Electronic or Written Comments

    If you submit written comments, they should be specific, confined 
to issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason 
for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but 
those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final 
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or 
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history, 
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent State or 
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant 
publications.
    We cannot ensure that comments received after the close of the 
comment period (see DATES) or sent to an address other than those 
listed (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for this 
rulemaking and considered.

Public Availability of Comments

    Before including your address, phone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment including your personal identifying 
information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

Public Hearing

    If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on 
November 21, 2012. If you are disabled and need reasonable 
accommodations to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and 
time of the hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no 
one requests an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
    To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we 
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing 
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public 
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to 
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the 
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you 
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will 
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in 
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.

Public Meeting

    If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a 
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with 
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the 
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings 
are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of 
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a 
written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.

IV. Procedural Determinations

Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.

Other Laws and Executive Orders Affecting Rulemaking

    When a State submits a program amendment to OSM for review, our 
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require us to publish a notice in the 
Federal Register indicating receipt of the proposed amendment, its text 
or a summary of its terms, and an opportunity for public comment. We 
conclude our review of the proposed amendment after the close of the 
public comment period and determine whether the amendment should be 
approved, approved in part, or not approved. At

[[Page 66577]]

that time, we will also make the determinations and certifications 
required by the various laws and executive orders governing the 
rulemaking process and include them in the final rule.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 943

    Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.

    Dated: August 16, 2012.
Ervin J. Barchenger,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-27086 Filed 11-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.