Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Delaware; Requirements for Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review; Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5, 66543-66545 [2012-26951]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone on a waterway during the
demolition of the Alliance Road Bridge
and is not expected to result in any
significant adverse environmental
impact as described in NEPA. This rule
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph (34)(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
categorical exclusion determination will
be made available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with RULES
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
■
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: A portion of the Locust
Fork to the Black Warrior River,
Birmingham, AL to include all waters
between river mile 392 and river mile
393.
(b) Effective dates. This rule is
effective and enforceable with actual
notice from October 10, 2012 through
November 30, 2012.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:24 Nov 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0902 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0902 Safety Zone; Alliance
Road Bridge Demolition; Black Warrior
River, Locust Fork; Birmingham, AL.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66543
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Mobile or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels desiring to enter
into or passage through the zone must
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Mobile or a designated
representative. They may be contacted
on VHF–FM channels 16 or by
telephone at 251–441–5976.
(3) If permission is granted, all
persons and vessels shall comply with
the instructions of the Captain of the
Port or designated representative.
(d) Informational Broadcasts. The
Captain of the Port or a designated
representative will inform the public
through broadcast notices to mariners of
the enforcement period for the safety
zone as well as any changes in the
planned schedule.
Dated: October 10, 2012.
D.J. Rose,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Mobile.
[FR Doc. 2012–27026 Filed 11–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0381; FRL–9747–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Delaware; Requirements for
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
and Nonattainment New Source
Review; Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5);
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
This document corrects an
omission in the final rule document
published on October 2, 2012,
announcing EPA’s final approval of
several revisions to the Delaware State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revisions pertain to preconstruction
requirements under the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) and
nonattainment New Source Review
(NSR) programs. The correction of this
omission does not change EPA’s final
action to approve these regulations or
their effectiveness.
DATES: This correcting amendment is
effective November 6, 2012 and is
applicable beginning November 1, 2012.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
66544
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gerallyn Duke, (215) 814–2084 or by
email at duke.gerallyn@.epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 2, 2012 (77 FR 60053), EPA
published a final rulemaking action
announcing its approval of revisions to
the Delaware SIP pertaining to
preconstruction requirements for fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) under the PSD
and nonattainment NSR programs. In
addition, that action approved select
portions of several Delaware SIP
submittals intended to address the
‘‘infrastructure’’ requirements of CAA
section 110(a)(2). Our approval of those
infrastructure elements was discussed
in the preamble to the final rulemaking
action. However, the document
inadvertently omitted necessary
revisions to table (e) of section 52.420
which incorporate the specific revisions
which are the subject of the final
rulemaking action. This action corrects
that oversight.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. EPA
has determined that there is good cause
for making this rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment
because it merely corrects an incorrect
citation in a previous action. Thus,
notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. EPA finds that this
constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B).
erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and is therefore not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 Fed. Reg.
28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because the
agency has made a ‘‘good cause’’ finding
that this action is not subject to noticeand-comment requirements under the
Administrative Procedures Act or any
other statute as indicated in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:24 Nov 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 601 et seq.), or
to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Pub. L. 104–4). In addition, this action
does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate,
as described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. This rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant. This technical
correction action does not involve
technical standards; thus the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings issued under the
executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.), as added by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1996, generally provides that before a
rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Section 808 allows the
issuing agency to make a rule effective
sooner than otherwise provided by the
CRA if the agency makes a good cause
finding that notice and public procedure
is impracticable, unnecessary or
contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a
brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2). As
stated previously, EPA had made such
a good cause finding, including the
reasons therefore, and established an
effective date of November 1, 2012. EPA
will submit a report containing this rule
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action to add the revision
to paragraph 52.420(e), is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, in 40 CFR part 52, the
following correcting amendments are
made:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 52.420, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by revising the entries
for section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour
Ozone NAAQS, section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS, section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS, section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008
Lead NAAQS to read as follows:
■
§ 52.420
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
State submittal
date
Name of non-regulatory SIP revision
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
*
*
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS.
*
Statewide .....................
*
12/13/07
9/19/08
9/16/09
*
8/4/11, 76 FR 47068
Statewide .....................
12/13/07
9/19/08
9/16/09
4/1/10
11/6/12 [Insert page
number where the
document begins]
Statewide .....................
12/13/07
3/12/08
9/16/09
3/10/10
12/13/07
3/12/08
9/16/09
3/14/12
8/4/11, 76 FR 47068
Statewide .....................
9/16/09
3/10/10
8/4/11, 76 FR 47068
Statewide .....................
9/16/09
3/14/12
11/6/12 [Insert page
number where the
document begins]
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
Statewide .....................
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.
*
*
*
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 2008 Lead NAAQS.
EPA approval date
11/6/12 [Insert page
number where the
document begins]
*
9/10/12, 77 FR 55420
Statewide .....................
10/17/11
3/14/12
11/6/12 [Insert page
number where the
document begins]
[FR Doc. 2012–26951 Filed 11–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0467; FRL–9748–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Michigan; Determination of Attainment
of the 1997 Annual Fine Particle
Standard for the Detroit-Ann Arbor
Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is making two final
determinations under the Clean Air Act
(Act) regarding the 1997 annual fine
particle (PM2.5) nonattainment area of
Detroit-Ann Arbor, Michigan
(Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland,
St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne
Counties) (Detroit-Ann Arbor area or
area). First, EPA is determining that the
erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:24 Nov 05, 2012
Jkt 229001
Detroit-Ann Arbor area has attained the
1997 annual PM2.5 National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). EPA
made this determination of attainment
based upon complete, quality-assured,
and certified ambient air monitoring
data for 2009–2011, showing that the
area has monitored attainment of the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Preliminary
data available for 2012 indicate
continued attainment. Pursuant to EPA
rule, this determination suspends the
requirements for the Detroit-Ann Arbor
area to submit an attainment
demonstration, associated reasonably
available control measures (RACM) to
include reasonably available control
technology (RACT), a reasonable further
progress (RFP) plan, contingency
measures, and other planning State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
related to attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS so long as the area
continues to attain the PM2.5 NAAQS.
EPA is also determining, based on
complete, quality-assured and certified
monitoring data for the 2007–2010
monitoring period, that the Detroit-Ann
Arbor area had attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by the its attainment date
of April 5, 2010.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on December 6, 2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
*
*
This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M) or portions
thereof.
This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) or portions thereof.
This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M) or portions
thereof.
This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) or portions thereof.
This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M), or portions
thereof.
This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) or portions thereof.
*
10/17/11
Dated: October 19, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
III.
Additional explanation
*
Statewide .....................
Sfmt 4700
66545
*
This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M) or portions
thereof.
This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), and (J) or portions thereof.
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0467. All
documents in these dockets are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation
Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that
you telephone Carolyn Persoon at (312)
353–8290 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carolyn Persoon, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8290,
persoon.carolyn@epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 6, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66543-66545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26951]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0381; FRL-9747-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Delaware; Requirements for Prevention of Significant Deterioration and
Nonattainment New Source Review; Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5);
Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects an omission in the final rule document
published on October 2, 2012, announcing EPA's final approval of
several revisions to the Delaware State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revisions pertain to preconstruction requirements under the Prevention
of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and nonattainment New Source Review
(NSR) programs. The correction of this omission does not change EPA's
final action to approve these regulations or their effectiveness.
DATES: This correcting amendment is effective November 6, 2012 and is
applicable beginning November 1, 2012.
[[Page 66544]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerallyn Duke, (215) 814-2084 or by
email at duke.gerallyn@.epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 2, 2012 (77 FR 60053), EPA
published a final rulemaking action announcing its approval of
revisions to the Delaware SIP pertaining to preconstruction
requirements for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) under the
PSD and nonattainment NSR programs. In addition, that action approved
select portions of several Delaware SIP submittals intended to address
the ``infrastructure'' requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2). Our
approval of those infrastructure elements was discussed in the preamble
to the final rulemaking action. However, the document inadvertently
omitted necessary revisions to table (e) of section 52.420 which
incorporate the specific revisions which are the subject of the final
rulemaking action. This action corrects that oversight.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. EPA has determined that
there is good cause for making this rule final without prior proposal
and opportunity for comment because it merely corrects an incorrect
citation in a previous action. Thus, notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. EPA finds that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 Fed. Reg. 28355 (May 22, 2001)).
Because the agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action
is not subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the
Administrative Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the
Supplementary Information section above, it is not subject to the
regulatory flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C 601 et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action
does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
governments, as specified by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
This technical correction action does not involve technical standards;
thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
The rule also does not involve special consideration of environmental
justice related issues as required by Executive Order 12898 (59 FR
7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729,
February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of the rule
in accordance with the Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings issued
under the executive order. This rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.). The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of November 1,
2012. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action to add the revision to
paragraph 52.420(e), is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, in 40 CFR part 52, the following correcting amendments
are made:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 52.420, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by revising
the entries for section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the
1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS, section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead NAAQS to read as follows:
Sec. 52.420 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 66545]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable State
Name of non-regulatory SIP geographic or submittal EPA approval date Additional explanation
revision nonattainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Statewide.......... 12/13/07 8/4/11, 76 FR 47068 This action addresses
Requirements for the 1997 8- 9/19/08 the following CAA
Hour Ozone NAAQS. 9/16/09 elements:
110(a)(2)(A), (B),
(C), (D)(ii), (E),
(F), (G), (H), (J),
(K), (L), and (M) or
portions thereof.
Statewide.......... 12/13/07 11/6/12 [Insert This action addresses
9/19/08 page number where the following CAA
9/16/09 the document elements:
4/1/10 begins] 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) or
portions thereof.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Statewide.......... 12/13/07 8/4/11, 76 FR 47068 This action addresses
Requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 3/12/08 the following CAA
NAAQS. 9/16/09 elements:
3/10/10 110(a)(2)(A), (B),
(C), (D)(ii), (E),
(F), (G), (H), (J),
(K), (L), and (M) or
portions thereof.
Statewide.......... 12/13/07 11/6/12 [Insert This action addresses
3/12/08 page number where the following CAA
9/16/09 the document elements:
3/14/12 begins] 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) or
portions thereof.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Statewide.......... 9/16/09 8/4/11, 76 FR 47068 This action addresses
Requirements for the 2006 PM2.5 3/10/10 the following CAA
NAAQS. elements:
110(a)(2)(A), (B),
(C), (D)(ii), (E),
(F), (G), (H), (J),
(K), (L), and (M), or
portions thereof.
Statewide.......... 9/16/09 11/6/12 [Insert This action addresses
3/14/12 page number where the following CAA
the document elements:
begins] 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) or
portions thereof.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Statewide.......... 10/17/11 9/10/12, 77 FR This action addresses
Requirements for the 2008 Lead 55420 the following CAA
NAAQS. elements:
110(a)(2)(A), (B),
(C), (D), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K),
(L), and (M) or
portions thereof.
Statewide.......... 10/17/11 11/6/12 [Insert This action addresses
3/14/12 page number where the following CAA
the document elements:
begins] 110(a)(2)(C),
(D)(i)(II), and (J) or
portions thereof.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: October 19, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012-26951 Filed 11-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
