Receipt of an Application for Incidental Take Permit (16230), 65864-65867 [2012-26791]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
65864
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2012 / Notices
used to characterize differences between
healthy and diseased tissues by
studying the composition of their
ultrastructure. Justification for DutyFree Entry: There are no instruments of
the same general category manufactured
in the United States. Application
accepted by Commissioner of Customs:
October 2, 2012.
Docket Number: 12–044. Applicant:
University of Colorado, 347 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI,
Czech Republic. Intended Use: The
instrument will be used to examine the
consequences of mutations,
experimental manipulations or disease
states of cells and tissues in various
organisms. It will also be used to locate
specific proteins within the samples.
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There
are no instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: October 9,
2012.
Docket Number: 12–045. Applicant:
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research,
2460 Linden Lane Bldg #503, Silver
Spring, MD 20910. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd.,
Japan. Intended Use: The instrument
will be used to observe ultrastructural
evidence of infectious agents or to
observe the ultrastructural pathology or
cellular changes caused by infectious
agents or therapeutic agents directed
toward a certain cell type or cellular
organelle. The objectives include
observing how a certain microbe
interacts with a cell, certain cellular
population(s), or subcellular
component; or to further provide
ultrastructural classification of an
organism. Justification for Duty-Free
Entry: There are no instruments of the
same general category manufactured in
the United States. Application accepted
by Commissioner of Customs: October
12, 2012.
Docket Number: 12–046. Applicant:
Battelle Memorial Institute, 790 6th St,
Richland, WA 99354. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI,
Czech Republic. Intended Use: The
instrument will be used to study the
structure and chemistry of inorganic
materials such as catalysts,
semiconductors, and battery materials,
to understand the structure-property or
structure-activity of the materials and to
provide a feedback loop between
synthesis and characterization.
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There
are no instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: October 12,
2012.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Oct 30, 2012
Jkt 229001
Dated: October 25, 2012.
Gregory W. Campbell
Director of Subsidies Enforcement, Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–26798 Filed 10–30–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel
Reviews
NAFTA Secretariat, United
States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Decision of Panel.
AGENCY:
On October 25, 2012, the
NAFTA Chapter 19 binational panel
issued its decision in the review of the
final results of the 2005/2006
antidumping administrative review
made by the U.S. Department of
Commerce, respecting Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Canada, NAFTA Secretariat File
Number USA–CDA–2008–1904–02. The
panel affirmed the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s Final Determination with
regard to the issue of zeroing in this
matter. Copies of the panel’s decision
are available from the U.S. Section of
the NAFTA Secretariat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen M. Bohon, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686). The panel review in this
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
matter has been conducted in
accordance with these Rules.
Panel Decision
On May 11, 2012, the binational panel
affirmed the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s final results of the
administrative review determining that
the Complainant’s sales were made at
the same level of trade. The panel
remanded to the U.S. Department of
Commerce with regard to its practice of
‘‘zeroing’’ in the administrative review
before the panel, with instructions to
provide an explanation consistent with
the remand orders in two previous
cases. (Dongbu Steel Co. Ltd. v. United
States, 635 F3d 1363 (Fed Cir. 2011);
and JTEKT Corp. v. United States, 642
F3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2011)) On October
25, 2012, in accordance with Article
1904.8 of NAFTA, and for reasons set
out in the panel’s written decision and
related order, the panel affirmed the
Department of Commerce’s Final
Determination with regard to the issue
of ‘‘zeroing’’ in this matter.
Dated: October 25, 2012.
Ellen M. Bohon,
U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2012–26694 Filed 10–30–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC289
Receipt of an Application for Incidental
Take Permit (16230)
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Supplemental Notice of receipt
of application for incidental take permit;
availability of draft conservation plan.
AGENCY:
NMFS has received an
amended application for an incidental
take permit (Permit) from the North
Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries
(NCDMF) pursuant to the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA).
As required by the ESA, NCDMF′s
application includes a proposed
conservation plan designed to minimize
and mitigate take of endangered or
threatened species. The permit
application is for the incidental take of
ESA-listed adult and juvenile sea turtles
associated with otherwise lawful
commercial gillnet fisheries operating in
inshore waters of North Carolina. The
duration of the proposed permit is for
10 years. NMFS is providing this notice
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2012 / Notices
to allow other agencies and the public
an opportunity to review and comment
on the revised application and
associated proposed conservation plan.
All comments received will become part
of the public record and will be
available for review. An electronic copy
of the revised application and proposed
conservation plan may be obtained by
contacting NMFS Office of Protected
Resources (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT) or visiting the internet at
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
esa_review.htm. Public comments
received in response to the original
Notice of Receipt (76 FR 61670, October
5, 2011) are available on
www.regulations.gov (see ADDRESSES).
DATES: Written comments from
interested parties on the permit
application and conservation plan must
be received at the appropriate address or
fax number (see ADDRESSES) no later
than 5 p.m. Eastern daylight time on
November 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the permit application and
conservation plan, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2011–0231, by any of the
following methods during the 30-day
comment period:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal
www.regulations.gov. To submit
comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal,
first click the ‘‘submit a comment’’ icon,
then enter NOAA–NMFS–2011–0231 in
the keyword search. Locate the
document you wish to comment on
from the resulting list and click on the
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ icon on the right
of that line.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Kristy Long, Office of Protected
Resources, 1315 East West Highway,
13th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
• Fax: 301–713–0376; Attn: Kristy
Long.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Oct 30, 2012
Jkt 229001
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristy Long (ph. 301–427–8402, email
Kristy.Long@noaa.gov; Dennis Klemm
(ph. 727–824–5312, email
Dennis.Klemm@noaa.gov).
Section 9
of the ESA and Federal regulations
prohibit the taking of a species listed as
endangered or threatened. The term
‘‘take’’ is defined under the ESA to
mean harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or
to attempt to engage in any such
conduct. NMFS may issue permits,
under limited circumstances, to take
listed species incidental to, and not the
purpose of, otherwise lawful activities.
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA provides
for authorizing incidental take of listed
species. NMFS regulations governing
permits for threatened and endangered
species are published at 50 CFR
222.307.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Species Covered in this Notice
The following species are included in
the conservation plan and Permit
application: Loggerhead (Caretta
caretta), green (Chelonia mydas),
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea),
hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata), and
Kemp’s ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) sea
turtles.
Background
NMFS issued Permit No. 1259 to
NCDMF (65 FR 65840, November 2,
2000), Permit No. 1348 (66 FR 51023,
October 5, 2001), Permit No. 1398 (67
FR 67150, November 4, 2002), and
Permit No. 1528 (70 FR 52984,
September 6, 2005) authorizing the
incidental take of the foregoing species
in certain segments of the commercial
fall gill net fisheries for flounder in
Pamlico Sound subject to a series of
mandatory sea turtle management and
monitoring requirements and limits on
the numbers of individuals that could
be taken annually.
On August 18, 2011, NCDMF
submitted a revised application to
NMFS for Permit No. 16230, requesting
authorization for incidental take of ESAlisted sea turtles associated with
commercial and recreational gillnet
fisheries in inshore state waters for 3
years. This application includes
endangered Kemp’s ridley, leatherback,
and hawksbill sea turtles and threatened
green and loggerhead sea turtles. NMFS
published a notice of receipt of the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65865
August 2011 application and a request
for public comments on October 5, 2011
(76 FR 61670). Based on comments
received from the public, independent
reviewers, and NMFS, NCDMF
subsequently submitted a second
revised application on September 6,
2012. This permit, if issued, would
allow for the incidental take of specified
numbers of sea turtles incidental to the
continued commercial harvest of target
fish species in gillnets subject to
conservation, management and
monitoring requirements set forth in the
plan and as permit conditions deemed
necessary and appropriate by the NMFS
over a 10 year period.
Conservation Plan
The conservation plan prepared by
NCDMF describes measures designed to
monitor, minimize, and mitigate the
incidental take of ESA-listed sea turtles.
The conservation plan includes
managing inshore gill net fisheries by
dividing estuarine waters into 6
management units (i.e., A, B, C, D1, D2,
E). Each of the management units would
be monitored seasonally and by fishery.
Management units were delineated on
the basis of three primary factors:
similarity of fisheries and management;
extent of known protected species
interactions in commercial gill net
fisheries; and unit size and the ability of
the NCDMF to monitor fishing effort.
Management Unit A encompasses all
estuarine waters north of 35°46.30′ N. to
the North Carolina/Virginia state line.
This includes all of Albemarle,
Currituck, Croatan, and Roanoke sounds
as well as the contributing river systems
in this area. Management Unit B
encompasses all estuarine waters south
of 35°46.30′ N., east of 76°30.00′ W. and
north of 34°48.27′ N. This Management
Unit will include all of Pamlico Sound
and the Northern portion of Core Sound.
Management Unit C will include the
Pamlico, Pungo and Neuse river
drainages west of 76°30.00′ W.
Management Unit D is divided into two
areas, D1 and D2, to allow the NCDMF
to effectively address areas of high sea
turtle abundance or ‘‘hot spots’’.
Management Unit D1 encompasses all
estuarine waters south of 34°48.27′ N.
and east of a line running from 34°40.70′
N.—76°22.50′ W. to 34°42.48′ N.—
76°36.70′ W. Management Unit D1
includes Southern Core Sound, Back
Sound and North River. Management
Unit D2 encompasses all estuarine
waters west of a line running from
34°40.70′ N.—76°22.50′ W. to 34°42.48′
N.—76°36.70′ W. to the Highway 58
bridge. Management Unit D2 includes
Newport River and Bogue Sound.
Management Unit E encompasses all
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
65866
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2012 / Notices
estuarine waters south and west of the
Highway 58 bridge to the North
Carolina/South Carolina state line. This
includes the Atlantic Intercoastal
Waterway and adjacent sounds, and the
New, Cape Fear, Lockwood Folly, White
Oak, and Shallotte rivers.
The large mesh (≥ 4 inch stretched
mesh (10.16 cm)) gillnet fisheries
primarily target southern flounder
(Paralicthys lethostigma), striped bass
(Morone saxatilis), American shad
(Alosa americana), hickory shad
(Polomolobus mediocris), and catfishes
(Ictalurus sp.). Large mesh gill net
fisheries for flounder traditionally
operate throughout the majority of the
sounds and lower estuarine river
systems with peaks in effort in the
spring/summer months (April—June),
and in the fall months (September–
November). Fisheries for striped bass
are more limited in time and space due
to the anadromous migration pattern of
this species. Striped bass gill net
fisheries are prosecuted from late
October through late April; fishermen
are prohibited from targeting striped
bass from May through early October.
Consequently, the majority of striped
bass effort occurs in Albemarle Sound
with seasonal effort occurring in the
Pamlico Sound and the Pamlico and
Neuse River systems. American and
hickory shad fishing operations occur
almost exclusively from January 1
through April 14 due to their
anadromous migration patterns and
distribution. Catfish are harvested with
large mesh gillnets in rivers and
Western Albemarle Sound with the
majority of catches occurring during the
winter to spring months. The most
common mesh size for all large mesh
gill net fisheries is 51⁄2 inch (13.97 cm)
stretched mesh.
The small mesh (<4 inch stretched
mesh (10.16 cm)) gillnet fisheries
primarily target spot (Leiostomus
xanthurus), striped mullet (Mugil
cephalus), bluefish (Pomatomus
saltatrix), spotted seatrout (Cynoscion
nebulosus), weakfish (Cynoscion
regalis), Atlantic menhaden (Brevoortia
tyrannus), Spanish mackerel
(Scomberomorus maculates), white
perch (Morone americana), and
kingfishes (Menticirrhus sp.). Peaks in
spot landings occur in the spring/
summer (April to June) and fall (October
to November) months; spot are landed
throughout the estuarine waters and
river systems. Striped mullet are landed
year round with peaks in the fall/winter
months (October to January). Bluefish
are also landed year round throughout
the estuarine and river systems with
most landings occurring in the spring
during April and May. Spotted seatrout
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Oct 30, 2012
Jkt 229001
and weakfish are targeted by small mesh
gillnet operations primarily in the fall/
winter (September to January) months.
Weakfish landings may also peak in the
spring during April and May. Atlantic
menhaden are mostly targeted during
the spring (February to May) with
another peak in landings occurring in
October. Spanish mackerel are primarily
targeted during the spring and fall
months. White perch are almost
exclusively targeted during the winter/
spring months (December to April).
Kingfishes are targeted primarily in the
spring and the fall throughout the
estuarine and river systems. Mesh sizes
used in small mesh gill net operations
vary more than those used in large mesh
fisheries. However, the most commonly
used small mesh sizes generally fall
between 3 inch (7.62 cm) and 33⁄4; inch
(9.53 cm) stretched mesh.
Management measures identified in
the proposed conservation plan include:
(1) Restricted soak times for large mesh
gillnets from one hour before sunset on
Monday through Thursday and one
hour after sunrise from Tuesday through
Friday (i.e., fishing is prohibited from
one hour after sunrise on Friday through
one hour before sunset on Monday); (2)
restrictions on the maximum net length
per large mesh fishing operation (i.e.,
2,000 yards (1.83 km, 6,000 ft) per
operation except south of the NC
Highway 58 bridge and Management
Area D2 where 1,000 yards (0.91 km,
3,000 ft) is maximum; (3) restrictions on
large mesh net-shot lengths to 100 yards
(91.44 m, 300 ft) with a 25 yard (22.86
m, 75 ft) separation between each netshot; (4) requirement for large mesh nets
to be low profile (e.g., maximum of 15
meshes in depth, tie-downs prohibited,
floats or corks prohibited along float
lines north of the NC Highway 58
bridge); and (5) closure of Management
Area D1 to unattended large mesh
gillnets from May 8–October 14
annually. NCDMF proposes to monitor
sea turtle interactions through reports
from fishery observers (both traditional
and alternative platform), fishermen,
and NCDMF Marine Patrol at a
minimum of 7% coverage annually for
large mesh gillnets and 1–2% annually
for small mesh gillnets.
The annual incidental take of sea
turtles requested for large mesh and
small mesh gillnets in Management
Units B, D1, D2, and E is 684 and 74,
respectively. Specifically, the requested
lethal and non-lethal take by species is
49 lethal and 98 non-lethal Kemp’s
ridley, 165 lethal and 330 non-lethal
green, 22 lethal or non-lethal loggerhead
turtles, and 4 lethal or non-lethal takes
each of hawksbill and leatherback
turtles. In Management Units A and C,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the annual incidental lethal or nonlethal take of sea turtles requested for
large and small mesh gillnets combined
is 16 turtles of any species.
NCDMF is proposing to limit inshore
gillnet fisheries such that the impacts on
ESA-listed sea turtles will be
minimized. NCDMF would use a variety
of adaptive fishery management
measures and restrictions through their
state proclamation authority to reduce
sea turtle mortality and prohibit fishing
in management units where incidental
take thresholds are exceeded. NCDMF
considered and rejected five other
alternatives, including: (1) A no action
alternative; (2) not applying for a permit
and closing the fishery; (3) further
reducing large mesh effort (e.g., yardage,
soak time) and requiring attendance in
all Management Areas; (4) restricting
large mesh effort in Management Areas
A and C similar to B, D1, D2, and E; and
(5) reducing small mesh gillnet effort
(e.g., yardage, soak time) and requiring
attendance in all Management Areas.
National Environmental Policy Act
Issuing a permit would constitute a
major Federal action requiring NMFS to
comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) as implemented by
40 CFR parts 1500–1508 and NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6,
Environmental Review Procedures for
Implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act (1999). NMFS
intends to prepare an Environmental
Assessment (EA) to consider a range of
reasonable alternatives and fully
evaluate the direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts likely to result from
issuing a permit. NMFS will make this
EA available for public comment.
Next Steps
This notice is provided pursuant to
section 10(c) of the ESA. NMFS will
evaluate the application, associated
documents, and comments submitted
thereon to determine whether the
application meets the requirements of
section 10(a) of the ESA. The
application, supporting documents,
public comments, and views already
received by the agency as well as those
submitted in response to this notice will
also be fully considered and evaluated
as we prepare the EA and determine
whether or not to issue a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI). The final
NEPA document and permit
determinations will not be completed
until after the end of the 30-day
comment period. If we determine that
the requirements of section 10(a) and
the procedural requirements of NEPA
are met, NMFS will issue a permit for
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2012 / Notices
incidental takes of ESA-listed sea turtles
under the jurisdiction of NMFS. NMFS
will publish a record of its final action
in the Federal Register. We will also
make any final NEPA documents
available to the public.
Dated: October 25, 2012.
Helen M. Golde,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–26791 Filed 10–30–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC329
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Council; Public Hearings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS);
notice of initiation of scoping process;
notice of scoping meetings; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (Council)
announces its intent to prepare an
amendment (Amendment 15) to the
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for
Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish
(MSB) and to prepare an EIS to analyze
the impacts of any proposed
management measures. The Council is
initiating a public process to determine
the scope of alternatives to be addressed
in the amendment and EIS. This
amendment currently will address the
following issue: Whether the Council
should begin direct federal management
of river herrings (alewife and/or
blueback herring) and/or shads
(American and/or hickory). Additional
issues may be added depending on the
outcome of the scoping process. NMFS
and the Council are alerting the
interested public of the commencement
of the scoping process and providing for
public participation in compliance with
environmental documentation
requirements.
SUMMARY:
Public comments on
Amendment 15 scoping must be
received no later than 11:59 p.m.,
eastern standard time, on December 5,
2012. Scoping hearings will be held on
the following dates:
• Nov 14, 2012, 6 p.m.–8 p.m.:
Internet Webinar: https://
www1.gotomeeting.com/register/
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Oct 30, 2012
Jkt 229001
268451473; While anyone with internet
access can join the webinar, there will
also be a listening post at: Virginia
Marine Resources Commission, 2600
Washington Avenue, 3rd Floor,
Newport News, VA 23607, (757) 247–
2200.
• Nov 15, 2012, 7 p.m.–9 p.m.:
Internet Webinar: https://
www1.gotomeeting.com/register/
625483785; While anyone with internet
access can join the webinar, there will
also be a listening post at: New York
Marine Resources Bureau Headquarters;
205 North Belle Mead Rd., Suite 1, East
Setauket, NY 11733, (631) 444–0430.
• Nov 19, 2012, 7 p.m.–9 p.m.:
Congress Hall, 251 Beach Ave, Cape
May, NJ 08204, 888–944–1816.
• Nov 20, 2012, 7 p.m.–9 p.m.:
Radisson Hotel Providence Airport;
2081 Post Road; Warwick, RI 401–739–
3000.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on
Amendment 15 may be sent by any of
the following methods:
• Email to the following address:
nmfs.ner.msbam15@noaa.gov. Include
‘‘Scoping Comments on MSB 15’’ in the
subject;
• Mail to Chris Moore, Ph.D.,
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, 800 North
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901.
Mark the outside of the envelope
‘‘Scoping Comments on MSB 15’’ or
• Fax to Chris Moore, Ph.D., (302)
674–5399. Include ‘‘Scoping Comments
on MSB 15’’ in the fax.
Requests for copies of the scoping
document and other information should
be directed to Chris Moore, Ph.D.,
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, 800 North
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901,
toll-free telephone: (877) 446–2362. The
scoping document is also accessible via
the Internet at https://www.mafmc.org/
fmp/msb.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director,
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Council. Toll-free telephone: (877) 446–
2362.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of this amendment is to
consider measures for direct river
herring and shad (RH/S) management by
the Council. Currently, RH/S are
managed by the Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) but
there are interactions with federal
fisheries in federal waters. More direct
management by the Council may help
RH/S conservation efforts, which do not
appear to have yet rebuilt many RH/S
stocks. The amendment will consider
whether the current management
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65867
framework for river herring and shad is
sufficient for conservation and
management of these species and
whether Federal management under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act would address
any deficiencies and/or inefficiencies. If
management under the MagnusonStevens Act can address those issues,
the amendment will consider a range of
measures for Federal involvement/
management. More details on the topics
addressed in this supplementary
information section may be found in the
Amendment 15 scoping document (see
above for how to obtain scoping
document).
The Council will first gather
information during the scoping period.
This is the first and best opportunity for
members of the public to raise concerns
related to the scope of issues that will
be considered in Amendment 15. The
Council needs your input both to
identify management issues and
develop effective alternatives. Your
comments early in the amendment
development process will help us
address issues of public concern in a
thorough and appropriate manner.
Comments can be made in writing,
electronically, or during the scoping
hearings as described above. If the
Council decides to move forward with
Amendment 15, the Council will
develop a range of management
alternatives to be considered and
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to analyze the impacts
of the management alternatives being
considered as required by the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Impacts may be direct, indirect,
individual, or cumulative. A draft EIS
will be distributed for public review.
During a 45-day public comment period
(which will also include public
hearings) the public may comment on
any aspect of the draft EIS. Following a
review of the comments, the Council
will then choose preferred management
measures for submission with the Final
EIS to the Secretary of Commerce for
publishing of a proposed and then final
rule, both of which have additional
comment periods.
Special Accommodations: The
scoping hearings are accessible to
people with physical disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Chris Moore,
Ph.D. (see contact info above) at least 5
days prior to the meeting date. Please
contact Jason Didden at
jdidden@mafmc.org or (302) 526–5254
at least 5 days prior to the meeting date
if you would like to confirm that your
computer is set up to access the
webinar. The webinar works for most
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 211 (Wednesday, October 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65864-65867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26791]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XC289
Receipt of an Application for Incidental Take Permit (16230)
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Supplemental Notice of receipt of application for incidental
take permit; availability of draft conservation plan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has received an amended application for an incidental
take permit (Permit) from the North Carolina Division of Marine
Fisheries (NCDMF) pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA). As required by the ESA, NCDMF's application includes a
proposed conservation plan designed to minimize and mitigate take of
endangered or threatened species. The permit application is for the
incidental take of ESA-listed adult and juvenile sea turtles associated
with otherwise lawful commercial gillnet fisheries operating in inshore
waters of North Carolina. The duration of the proposed permit is for 10
years. NMFS is providing this notice
[[Page 65865]]
to allow other agencies and the public an opportunity to review and
comment on the revised application and associated proposed conservation
plan. All comments received will become part of the public record and
will be available for review. An electronic copy of the revised
application and proposed conservation plan may be obtained by
contacting NMFS Office of Protected Resources (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) or visiting the internet at www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/esa_review.htm. Public comments received in response to the
original Notice of Receipt (76 FR 61670, October 5, 2011) are available
on www.regulations.gov (see ADDRESSES).
DATES: Written comments from interested parties on the permit
application and conservation plan must be received at the appropriate
address or fax number (see ADDRESSES) no later than 5 p.m. Eastern
daylight time on November 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the permit application and
conservation plan, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2011-0231, by any of the
following methods during the 30-day comment period:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal www.regulations.gov. To
submit comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal, first click the ``submit a
comment'' icon, then enter NOAA-NMFS-2011-0231 in the keyword search.
Locate the document you wish to comment on from the resulting list and
click on the ``Submit a Comment'' icon on the right of that line.
Mail: Submit written comments to Kristy Long, Office of
Protected Resources, 1315 East West Highway, 13th Floor, Silver Spring,
MD 20910.
Fax: 301-713-0376; Attn: Kristy Long.
Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above
methods to ensure that the comments are received, documented, and
considered by NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered. All comments received are a part of the public
record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the
sender will be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you
wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be
accepted in Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristy Long (ph. 301-427-8402, email
Kristy.Long@noaa.gov; Dennis Klemm (ph. 727-824-5312, email
Dennis.Klemm@noaa.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 9 of the ESA and Federal regulations
prohibit the taking of a species listed as endangered or threatened.
The term ``take'' is defined under the ESA to mean harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to
attempt to engage in any such conduct. NMFS may issue permits, under
limited circumstances, to take listed species incidental to, and not
the purpose of, otherwise lawful activities. Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
ESA provides for authorizing incidental take of listed species. NMFS
regulations governing permits for threatened and endangered species are
published at 50 CFR 222.307.
Species Covered in this Notice
The following species are included in the conservation plan and
Permit application: Loggerhead (Caretta caretta), green (Chelonia
mydas), leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), hawksbill (Eretmochelys
imbricata), and Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) sea turtles.
Background
NMFS issued Permit No. 1259 to NCDMF (65 FR 65840, November 2,
2000), Permit No. 1348 (66 FR 51023, October 5, 2001), Permit No. 1398
(67 FR 67150, November 4, 2002), and Permit No. 1528 (70 FR 52984,
September 6, 2005) authorizing the incidental take of the foregoing
species in certain segments of the commercial fall gill net fisheries
for flounder in Pamlico Sound subject to a series of mandatory sea
turtle management and monitoring requirements and limits on the numbers
of individuals that could be taken annually.
On August 18, 2011, NCDMF submitted a revised application to NMFS
for Permit No. 16230, requesting authorization for incidental take of
ESA-listed sea turtles associated with commercial and recreational
gillnet fisheries in inshore state waters for 3 years. This application
includes endangered Kemp's ridley, leatherback, and hawksbill sea
turtles and threatened green and loggerhead sea turtles. NMFS published
a notice of receipt of the August 2011 application and a request for
public comments on October 5, 2011 (76 FR 61670). Based on comments
received from the public, independent reviewers, and NMFS, NCDMF
subsequently submitted a second revised application on September 6,
2012. This permit, if issued, would allow for the incidental take of
specified numbers of sea turtles incidental to the continued commercial
harvest of target fish species in gillnets subject to conservation,
management and monitoring requirements set forth in the plan and as
permit conditions deemed necessary and appropriate by the NMFS over a
10 year period.
Conservation Plan
The conservation plan prepared by NCDMF describes measures designed
to monitor, minimize, and mitigate the incidental take of ESA-listed
sea turtles. The conservation plan includes managing inshore gill net
fisheries by dividing estuarine waters into 6 management units (i.e.,
A, B, C, D1, D2, E). Each of the management units would be monitored
seasonally and by fishery.
Management units were delineated on the basis of three primary
factors: similarity of fisheries and management; extent of known
protected species interactions in commercial gill net fisheries; and
unit size and the ability of the NCDMF to monitor fishing effort.
Management Unit A encompasses all estuarine waters north of
35[deg]46.30' N. to the North Carolina/Virginia state line. This
includes all of Albemarle, Currituck, Croatan, and Roanoke sounds as
well as the contributing river systems in this area. Management Unit B
encompasses all estuarine waters south of 35[deg]46.30' N., east of
76[deg]30.00' W. and north of 34[deg]48.27' N. This Management Unit
will include all of Pamlico Sound and the Northern portion of Core
Sound. Management Unit C will include the Pamlico, Pungo and Neuse
river drainages west of 76[deg]30.00' W. Management Unit D is divided
into two areas, D1 and D2, to allow the NCDMF to effectively address
areas of high sea turtle abundance or ``hot spots''. Management Unit D1
encompasses all estuarine waters south of 34[deg]48.27' N. and east of
a line running from 34[deg]40.70' N.--76[deg]22.50' W. to 34[deg]42.48'
N.--76[deg]36.70' W. Management Unit D1 includes Southern Core Sound,
Back Sound and North River. Management Unit D2 encompasses all
estuarine waters west of a line running from 34[deg]40.70' N.--
76[deg]22.50' W. to 34[deg]42.48' N.--76[deg]36.70' W. to the Highway
58 bridge. Management Unit D2 includes Newport River and Bogue Sound.
Management Unit E encompasses all
[[Page 65866]]
estuarine waters south and west of the Highway 58 bridge to the North
Carolina/South Carolina state line. This includes the Atlantic
Intercoastal Waterway and adjacent sounds, and the New, Cape Fear,
Lockwood Folly, White Oak, and Shallotte rivers.
The large mesh (>= 4 inch stretched mesh (10.16 cm)) gillnet
fisheries primarily target southern flounder (Paralicthys lethostigma),
striped bass (Morone saxatilis), American shad (Alosa americana),
hickory shad (Polomolobus mediocris), and catfishes (Ictalurus sp.).
Large mesh gill net fisheries for flounder traditionally operate
throughout the majority of the sounds and lower estuarine river systems
with peaks in effort in the spring/summer months (April--June), and in
the fall months (September-November). Fisheries for striped bass are
more limited in time and space due to the anadromous migration pattern
of this species. Striped bass gill net fisheries are prosecuted from
late October through late April; fishermen are prohibited from
targeting striped bass from May through early October. Consequently,
the majority of striped bass effort occurs in Albemarle Sound with
seasonal effort occurring in the Pamlico Sound and the Pamlico and
Neuse River systems. American and hickory shad fishing operations occur
almost exclusively from January 1 through April 14 due to their
anadromous migration patterns and distribution. Catfish are harvested
with large mesh gillnets in rivers and Western Albemarle Sound with the
majority of catches occurring during the winter to spring months. The
most common mesh size for all large mesh gill net fisheries is 5\1/2\
inch (13.97 cm) stretched mesh.
The small mesh (<4 inch stretched mesh (10.16 cm)) gillnet
fisheries primarily target spot (Leiostomus xanthurus), striped mullet
(Mugil cephalus), bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix), spotted seatrout
(Cynoscion nebulosus), weakfish (Cynoscion regalis), Atlantic menhaden
(Brevoortia tyrannus), Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculates),
white perch (Morone americana), and kingfishes (Menticirrhus sp.).
Peaks in spot landings occur in the spring/summer (April to June) and
fall (October to November) months; spot are landed throughout the
estuarine waters and river systems. Striped mullet are landed year
round with peaks in the fall/winter months (October to January).
Bluefish are also landed year round throughout the estuarine and river
systems with most landings occurring in the spring during April and
May. Spotted seatrout and weakfish are targeted by small mesh gillnet
operations primarily in the fall/winter (September to January) months.
Weakfish landings may also peak in the spring during April and May.
Atlantic menhaden are mostly targeted during the spring (February to
May) with another peak in landings occurring in October. Spanish
mackerel are primarily targeted during the spring and fall months.
White perch are almost exclusively targeted during the winter/spring
months (December to April). Kingfishes are targeted primarily in the
spring and the fall throughout the estuarine and river systems. Mesh
sizes used in small mesh gill net operations vary more than those used
in large mesh fisheries. However, the most commonly used small mesh
sizes generally fall between 3 inch (7.62 cm) and 3\3/4\; inch (9.53
cm) stretched mesh.
Management measures identified in the proposed conservation plan
include: (1) Restricted soak times for large mesh gillnets from one
hour before sunset on Monday through Thursday and one hour after
sunrise from Tuesday through Friday (i.e., fishing is prohibited from
one hour after sunrise on Friday through one hour before sunset on
Monday); (2) restrictions on the maximum net length per large mesh
fishing operation (i.e., 2,000 yards (1.83 km, 6,000 ft) per operation
except south of the NC Highway 58 bridge and Management Area D2 where
1,000 yards (0.91 km, 3,000 ft) is maximum; (3) restrictions on large
mesh net-shot lengths to 100 yards (91.44 m, 300 ft) with a 25 yard
(22.86 m, 75 ft) separation between each net-shot; (4) requirement for
large mesh nets to be low profile (e.g., maximum of 15 meshes in depth,
tie-downs prohibited, floats or corks prohibited along float lines
north of the NC Highway 58 bridge); and (5) closure of Management Area
D1 to unattended large mesh gillnets from May 8-October 14 annually.
NCDMF proposes to monitor sea turtle interactions through reports from
fishery observers (both traditional and alternative platform),
fishermen, and NCDMF Marine Patrol at a minimum of 7% coverage annually
for large mesh gillnets and 1-2% annually for small mesh gillnets.
The annual incidental take of sea turtles requested for large mesh
and small mesh gillnets in Management Units B, D1, D2, and E is 684 and
74, respectively. Specifically, the requested lethal and non-lethal
take by species is 49 lethal and 98 non-lethal Kemp's ridley, 165
lethal and 330 non-lethal green, 22 lethal or non-lethal loggerhead
turtles, and 4 lethal or non-lethal takes each of hawksbill and
leatherback turtles. In Management Units A and C, the annual incidental
lethal or non-lethal take of sea turtles requested for large and small
mesh gillnets combined is 16 turtles of any species.
NCDMF is proposing to limit inshore gillnet fisheries such that the
impacts on ESA-listed sea turtles will be minimized. NCDMF would use a
variety of adaptive fishery management measures and restrictions
through their state proclamation authority to reduce sea turtle
mortality and prohibit fishing in management units where incidental
take thresholds are exceeded. NCDMF considered and rejected five other
alternatives, including: (1) A no action alternative; (2) not applying
for a permit and closing the fishery; (3) further reducing large mesh
effort (e.g., yardage, soak time) and requiring attendance in all
Management Areas; (4) restricting large mesh effort in Management Areas
A and C similar to B, D1, D2, and E; and (5) reducing small mesh
gillnet effort (e.g., yardage, soak time) and requiring attendance in
all Management Areas.
National Environmental Policy Act
Issuing a permit would constitute a major Federal action requiring
NMFS to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) as implemented by 40 CFR parts 1500-1508 and NOAA
Administrative Order 216-6, Environmental Review Procedures for
Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (1999). NMFS intends
to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) to consider a range of
reasonable alternatives and fully evaluate the direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts likely to result from issuing a permit. NMFS will
make this EA available for public comment.
Next Steps
This notice is provided pursuant to section 10(c) of the ESA. NMFS
will evaluate the application, associated documents, and comments
submitted thereon to determine whether the application meets the
requirements of section 10(a) of the ESA. The application, supporting
documents, public comments, and views already received by the agency as
well as those submitted in response to this notice will also be fully
considered and evaluated as we prepare the EA and determine whether or
not to issue a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The final NEPA
document and permit determinations will not be completed until after
the end of the 30-day comment period. If we determine that the
requirements of section 10(a) and the procedural requirements of NEPA
are met, NMFS will issue a permit for
[[Page 65867]]
incidental takes of ESA-listed sea turtles under the jurisdiction of
NMFS. NMFS will publish a record of its final action in the Federal
Register. We will also make any final NEPA documents available to the
public.
Dated: October 25, 2012.
Helen M. Golde,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-26791 Filed 10-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P