Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 65882 [2012-26763]

Agencies

• FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 211 (Wednesday, October 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 65882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26763]



[[Page 65882]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (``PRA''), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., the FDIC may not conduct or 
sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to, an 
information collection unless it displays a currently valid Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The FDIC, as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites 
the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity 
to comment on the renewal of an existing information collection, as 
required by the PRA. On August 16, 2012 (77 FR 49444), the FDIC 
solicited public comment for a 60-day period on the renewal of the 
following information collection: ID Theft Red Flags. No comments were 
received. Therefore, the FDIC hereby gives notice of submission of its 
request for renewal to OMB for review.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 30, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
the FDIC by any of the following methods:
     https://www.FDIC.gov/regulations/laws/federal/notices.html
     Email: comments@fdic.gov Include the name of the 
collection in the subject line of the message.
     Mail: Gary A. Kuiper (202.898.3877), Counsel, Room NYA-
5046, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20429.
     Hand Delivery: Comments may be hand-delivered to the guard 
station at the rear of the 17th Street Building (located on F Street), 
on business days between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
    All comments should refer to the relevant OMB control number. A 
copy of the comments may also be submitted to the OMB desk officer for 
the FDIC: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary A. Kuiper, at the FDIC address 
above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Proposal to renew the following currently-approved collection of 
information:
    Title: Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies under the 
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act).
    OMB No.: 3064-0152.
    Affected Public: Individuals; Businesses or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4546.
    Estimated Time per Response: 16 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 72,736 hours.
    General Description of the Collection: 12 CFR 334.82, 334.90, 
334.91 and Appendix J to Part 334 implement sections 114 and 315 of the 
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act), Public 
Law 108-159 (2003). Section 114 amended section 615 of the Fair Credit 
Reporting Act (FCRA) to require the OCC, FRB, FDIC, OTS, NCUA, and FTC 
(Agencies) to issue jointly (i) Guidelines for financial institutions 
and creditors regarding identity theft with respect to their account 
holders and customers; (ii) regulations requiring each financial 
institution and creditor to establish reasonable policies and 
procedures for implementing the guidelines to identify possible risks 
to account holders or customers or to the safety and soundness of the 
institution or creditor; and (iii) regulations generally requiring 
credit and debit card issuers to assess the validity of change of 
address requests under certain circumstances. Section 315 amended 
section 605 of the FCRA to require the Agencies to issue regulations 
providing guidance regarding reasonable policies and procedures that a 
user of consumer reports must employ when a user receives a notice of 
address discrepancy from a consumer reporting agency (CRA). The 
information collections in Sec. 334.90 require each financial 
institution and creditor that offers or maintains one or more covered 
accounts to develop and implement a written Identity Theft Prevention 
Program (Program). In developing the Program, financial institutions 
and creditors are required to consider the guidelines in Appendix J to 
Part 334 and include those that are appropriate. The initial Program 
must be approved by the board of directors or an appropriate committee 
thereof. The board, an appropriate committee thereof or a designated 
employee at the level of senior management must be involved in the 
oversight of the Program. In addition, staff must be trained to carry 
out the Program. Pursuant to Sec. 334.91, each credit and debit card 
issuer is required to establish and implement policies and procedures 
to assess the validity of a change of address request under certain 
circumstances. Before issuing an additional or replacement card, the 
card issuer must notify the cardholder or use another means to assess 
the validity of the change of address. The information collections in 
Sec. 41.82 require each user of consumer reports to develop and 
implement reasonable policies and procedures designed to enable the 
user to form a reasonable belief that a consumer report relates to the 
consumer about whom it requested the report when the user receives a 
notice of address discrepancy from a CRA. A user of consumer reports 
must also develop and implement reasonable policies and procedures for 
furnishing an address for the consumer that the user has reasonably 
confirmed to be accurate to the CRA from which it receives a notice of 
address discrepancy when (1) The user can form a reasonable belief that 
the consumer report relates to the consumer about whom the user has 
requested the report; (2) the user establishes a continuing 
relationship with the consumer; and (3) the user regularly and in the 
ordinary course of business furnishes information to the CRA from which 
it received the notice of address discrepancy.

Request for Comment

    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of information 
is necessary for the proper performance of the FDIC's functions, 
including whether the information has practical utility; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimates of the burden of the information collection, 
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the information 
collection on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. All 
comments will become a matter of public record.

    Dated at Washington, DC, this 25th day of October 2012.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-26763 Filed 10-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P