Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 65808-65810 [2012-26198]
Download as PDF
65808
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l) of this AD.
(j) Repeat ETHF Inspection
For airplanes on which any splice repair
was required by this AD: Within 30,000 flight
cycles after the splice repair, repeat the
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD for the repaired wing. If no cracking is
found on the on the rear spar lower cap of
the repaired wing, repeat the inspection on
the affected wing rear spar lower cap
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,550
flight cycles. If any cracking is found during
any inspection required by this paragraph,
before further flight, repair using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraphs (g), (h), and
(i) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90–57A026,
dated February 11, 2010, which is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane and 14
CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(m) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Roger Durbin, Airframe Branch,
ANM–120L, FAA, Los Angeles ACO, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712–4137; phone: (562) 627–5233; fax:
(562) 627–5210; email: roger.durbin@faa.gov.
(2) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
Services Management, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, MC D800–0019, Long Beach, CA
90846–0001; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 2; fax 206–766–5683; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:49 Oct 30, 2012
Jkt 229001
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90–
57A026, Revision 1, dated February 23, 2011.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
Services Management, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, MC D800–0019, Long Beach, CA
90846–0001; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 2; fax 206–766–5683; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
19, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–26483 Filed 10–30–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0427; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–202–AD; Amendment
39–17233; AD 2012–21–17]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A320–214 and –232
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports that medium-head fasteners
were installed in lieu of shear-head
fasteners on a certain upper panel,
which manufacturer fatigue and damage
tolerance analyses demonstrated could
have an effect on panel fatigue life. This
AD requires repetitive inspections for
cracking of certain fasteners, and repairs
if necessary. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct such cracking, which
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
could result in the loss of structural
integrity of the airplane.
This AD becomes effective
December 5, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of December 5, 2012.
DATES:
You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.
regulations.gov or in person at the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1405;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on May 8, 2012 (77 FR 26996).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
A problem was reported during the
installation of upper panels on Frame 35 in
Airbus A320 final assembly line.
Investigations revealed that medium head
fasteners, Part Number (P/N) EN6114V3,
were installed in lieu of shear head fasteners,
P/N ASNA2657V3 and ASNA2043V3, which
were previously used. Installation of these
medium head fasteners leads to a deeper
countersink in the panel. Fatigue and damage
tolerance analyses were performed, the
results of which demonstrated that this
installation could have a fatigue impact on
two rows of fasteners between stringers
(STGR) 5 and 6, and indicated the need for
a specific inspection in this area.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could impair the structural
integrity of the affected aeroplanes.
For the reasons described above, this
[European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)]
AD requires repetitive special detailed [high
frequency eddy current] inspections [for
cracking] of the affected fasteners and,
depending on findings, the accomplishment
of associated corrective actions [repair].
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comments received.
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
31OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Support for the NPRM (77 FR 26996,
May 8, 2012)
Mr. Jason Aldrich stated that it
appears from the analysis gathered that
the repairs/modifications (proposed by
the NPRM (77 FR 26996, May 8, 2012))
could significantly reduce potential
damage to the airplane, which would
directly result in improved safety for
persons.
Request To Clarify Repair Approval
Airbus requested that we revise
paragraph (h) of the NPRM (77 FR
26996, May 8, 2012) to clarify that any
Repair Approval Sheet (RAS) approved
under authority of Airbus Design
Organization Approval (DOA) number
EASA 21J.031 is acceptable as a repair
method for the EASA or its delegated
agent.
We disagree to change the AD because
a change is not necessary. Paragraph (h)
of the AD allows repairs approved by
EASA or its delegated agent. We
understand that Airbus has discretion to
provide repair to their operators that
meets the certification basis of the
airplane and mitigates the unsafe
condition addressed in the AD. We have
not changed the AD in this regard.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Request for Terminating Action
Airbus requested that we allow a
repair performed according to the
proposed requirements in paragraph (h)
of the NPRM (77 FR 26996, May 8,
2012) as terminating action, as stated in
paragraph (3) of EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2011–0176, dated September
13, 2011.
We disagree to allow repairs as
terminating action in this AD. The
action identified by EASA in its AD is
not necessarily terminating action.
Under the provision of paragraph (i) of
this AD, we will consider requests for
approval of an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) if sufficient data
are submitted to substantiate that a
proposed repair meets an acceptable
level of safety as terminating action for
the repetitive inspections. We have not
changed the AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed, except for minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (77 FR
26996, May 8, 2012) for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:49 Oct 30, 2012
Jkt 229001
proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 26996,
May 8, 2012).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
44 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 3 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $11,220, or $255 per product.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this AD. We have no way
of determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65809
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.
gov; or in person at the Docket
Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM (77 FR 26996, May
8, 2012), the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2012–21–17 Airbus: Amendment 39–17233.
Docket No. FAA–2012–0427; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–202–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
effective December 5, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A320–
214 and –232 airplanes; certificated in any
category; manufacturer serial numbers 3456,
3503, 3516, 3529, 3591, 3597, 3611, 3631,
3696, 3698, 3714, 3719, 3775, 3777, 3780,
3782, 3786, 3797, 3805, 3812, 3870, 3907,
3909, 3913, 3922, 3929, 3946, 3953, 3975,
3979, 3991, 4010, 4012, 4014, 4027, 4034,
4043, 4046, 4064, 4065, 4084, 4093, 4094,
and 4097.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports that
medium-head fasteners were installed in lieu
of shear-head fasteners on a certain upper
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
31OCR1
65810
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
panel, which manufacturer fatigue and
damage tolerance analyses demonstrated
could have an effect on panel fatigue life. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct such
cracking, which could result in the loss of
structural integrity of the airplane.
(j) Related Information
Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2011–0176, dated September 13,
2011; and Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–
1244, excluding Appendix 1, dated March
17, 2011; for related information.
(f) Compliance
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–1244,
excluding Appendix 1, dated March 17,
2011.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS–EAW
(Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.
com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.
gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Repetitive Inspection
Before the accumulation of 35,900 total
flight cycles or 88,100 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first: Do a high frequency
eddy current inspection for cracking of the
two rows of six fasteners at frame 35 between
stringers 5 and 6 on the left and right sides,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
53–1244, excluding Appendix 1, dated
March 17, 2011. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 28,100
flight cycles or 56,300 flight hours,
whichever occurs first.
(h) Corrective Action
If any crack is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD: Before further flight, repair the crack
using a method approved by either the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) or
its delegated agent.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1405; fax (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM–116–AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:49 Oct 30, 2012
Jkt 229001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
16, 2012.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–26198 Filed 10–30–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0592; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–253–AD; Amendment
39–17230 AD 2012–21–14]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–
2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes. That AD currently requires a
one-time inspection of the shafts of the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
main landing gear (MLG) side-brace
fittings to detect corrosion, and the
forward and aft bushings in the lefthand and right-hand MLG side-brace
fittings to detect discrepancies. The
existing AD also requires corrective and
related actions if necessary. This new
AD requires repetitive detailed
inspections for corrosion and damage of
the MLG side-brace fitting, and
replacing the side-brace fitting shaft
with the re-designed side-brace fitting
shaft of the MLG if necessary. This AD
also requires eventual replacement of
certain side-brace fitting shafts with the
re-designed part. Replacement with a redesigned side-brace fitting shaft of the
MLG is terminating action for the
repetitive inspections. This AD was
prompted by reports of failure of the
side-brace fitting shaft of the main
landing gear (MLG) due to corrosion.
We are issuing this AD to prevent
fractures of the side-brace fitting shafts
of the MLG, and possible collapse of the
MLG.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
December 5, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of December 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Zimmer, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–
7306; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on June 12, 2012 (77 FR 34870),
and proposed to supersede AD 2004–
22–23, Amendment 39–13851 (69 FR
64856, November 9, 2004). That NPRM
proposed to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
Due to the failure of the main landing gear
(MLG) side brace fitting shaft, caused by
corrosion, [Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA)] Airworthiness Directive (AD) CF–
2002–41 was issued to require inspection and
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
31OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 211 (Wednesday, October 31, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65808-65810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26198]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0427; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-202-AD;
Amendment 39-17233; AD 2012-21-17]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A320-214 and -232 airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports that medium-head fasteners were installed in lieu of shear-head
fasteners on a certain upper panel, which manufacturer fatigue and
damage tolerance analyses demonstrated could have an effect on panel
fatigue life. This AD requires repetitive inspections for cracking of
certain fasteners, and repairs if necessary. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct such cracking, which could result in the loss of
structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective December 5, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 5,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1405;
fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on May 8, 2012 (77 FR
26996). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
A problem was reported during the installation of upper panels
on Frame 35 in Airbus A320 final assembly line. Investigations
revealed that medium head fasteners, Part Number (P/N) EN6114V3,
were installed in lieu of shear head fasteners, P/N ASNA2657V3 and
ASNA2043V3, which were previously used. Installation of these medium
head fasteners leads to a deeper countersink in the panel. Fatigue
and damage tolerance analyses were performed, the results of which
demonstrated that this installation could have a fatigue impact on
two rows of fasteners between stringers (STGR) 5 and 6, and
indicated the need for a specific inspection in this area.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could impair the
structural integrity of the affected aeroplanes.
For the reasons described above, this [European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA)] AD requires repetitive special detailed [high
frequency eddy current] inspections [for cracking] of the affected
fasteners and, depending on findings, the accomplishment of
associated corrective actions [repair].
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comments received.
[[Page 65809]]
Support for the NPRM (77 FR 26996, May 8, 2012)
Mr. Jason Aldrich stated that it appears from the analysis gathered
that the repairs/modifications (proposed by the NPRM (77 FR 26996, May
8, 2012)) could significantly reduce potential damage to the airplane,
which would directly result in improved safety for persons.
Request To Clarify Repair Approval
Airbus requested that we revise paragraph (h) of the NPRM (77 FR
26996, May 8, 2012) to clarify that any Repair Approval Sheet (RAS)
approved under authority of Airbus Design Organization Approval (DOA)
number EASA 21J.031 is acceptable as a repair method for the EASA or
its delegated agent.
We disagree to change the AD because a change is not necessary.
Paragraph (h) of the AD allows repairs approved by EASA or its
delegated agent. We understand that Airbus has discretion to provide
repair to their operators that meets the certification basis of the
airplane and mitigates the unsafe condition addressed in the AD. We
have not changed the AD in this regard.
Request for Terminating Action
Airbus requested that we allow a repair performed according to the
proposed requirements in paragraph (h) of the NPRM (77 FR 26996, May 8,
2012) as terminating action, as stated in paragraph (3) of EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011-0176, dated September 13, 2011.
We disagree to allow repairs as terminating action in this AD. The
action identified by EASA in its AD is not necessarily terminating
action. Under the provision of paragraph (i) of this AD, we will
consider requests for approval of an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) if sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that a proposed
repair meets an acceptable level of safety as terminating action for
the repetitive inspections. We have not changed the AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed, except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 26996, May 8, 2012) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 26996, May 8, 2012).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 44 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $11,220, or $255 per product.
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD. We
have no way of determining the number of products that may need these
actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (77 FR 26996, May 8, 2012),
the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2012-21-17 Airbus: Amendment 39-17233. Docket No. FAA-2012-0427;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-202-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December 5,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A320-214 and -232 airplanes;
certificated in any category; manufacturer serial numbers 3456,
3503, 3516, 3529, 3591, 3597, 3611, 3631, 3696, 3698, 3714, 3719,
3775, 3777, 3780, 3782, 3786, 3797, 3805, 3812, 3870, 3907, 3909,
3913, 3922, 3929, 3946, 3953, 3975, 3979, 3991, 4010, 4012, 4014,
4027, 4034, 4043, 4046, 4064, 4065, 4084, 4093, 4094, and 4097.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports that medium-head fasteners were
installed in lieu of shear-head fasteners on a certain upper
[[Page 65810]]
panel, which manufacturer fatigue and damage tolerance analyses
demonstrated could have an effect on panel fatigue life. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct such cracking, which could
result in the loss of structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Repetitive Inspection
Before the accumulation of 35,900 total flight cycles or 88,100
total flight hours, whichever occurs first: Do a high frequency eddy
current inspection for cracking of the two rows of six fasteners at
frame 35 between stringers 5 and 6 on the left and right sides, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1244, excluding Appendix 1, dated March 17, 2011.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 28,100
flight cycles or 56,300 flight hours, whichever occurs first.
(h) Corrective Action
If any crack is detected during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, repair the crack
using a method approved by either the Manager, International Branch,
ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) or its delegated agent.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone (425) 227-1405; fax (425) 227-1149. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(j) Related Information
Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2011-0176, dated
September 13, 2011; and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1244,
excluding Appendix 1, dated March 17, 2011; for related information.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1244, excluding Appendix 1,
dated March 17, 2011.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS-EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 16, 2012.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-26198 Filed 10-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P