Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules: Notice of Staff Memorandum, 65645-65646 [2012-26439]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 30, 2012 / Proposed Rules
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide a cost
estimate for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
13:18 Oct 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2008–0615; Directorate Identifier 2007–
NM–352–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by December
14, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 757–200, –200PF, –200CB,
and –300 series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 2800, Aircraft Fuel System.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of two
in-service occurrences on Model 737–400
airplanes of total loss of boost pump pressure
of the fuel feed system, followed by loss of
fuel system suction feed capability on one
engine, and in-flight shutdown of the engine.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
loss of the engine fuel suction feed capability
of the fuel system, which in the event of total
loss of the fuel boost pumps could result in
dual engine flameout, inability to restart the
engines, and consequent forced landing of
the airplane.
65645
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Sue Lucier, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; phone: 425–917–6438; fax: 425–917–
6590; email: suzanne.lucier@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
22, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–26670 Filed 10–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
(g) Operational Test and Corrective Actions
Within 7,500 flight hours or 36 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first: Perform an operational test of the
engine fuel suction feed of the fuel system,
and do all applicable corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757–28A0131, dated May 4, 2012. Do all
applicable corrective actions before further
flight. Repeat the operational test thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 7,500 flight hours or
36 months, whichever occurs first.
Thereafter, except as provided in paragraph
(h) of this AD, no alternative procedures or
repeat test intervals will be allowed.
[Docket No. AD12–6–000]
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18 CFR Chapter I
Retrospective Analysis of Existing
Rules: Notice of Staff Memorandum
Take notice that the
Commission staff is issuing a
memorandum setting forth certain
minor revisions to the Commission’s
Natural Gas Pipeline regulations that
may be appropriate to remove reporting
requirements that may no longer serve
their intended purpose. The
memorandum was issued pursuant to
the Nov. 8, 2011 Plan for Retrospective
Analysis of Existing Rules prepared in
response to Executive Order 13579,
which requested independent regulatory
agencies issue plans for periodic
retrospective analysis of their existing
regulations.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30OCP1.SGM
30OCP1
65646
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 30, 2012 / Proposed Rules
The Staff Memorandum is being
placed in the record in the abovereferenced administrative docket. The
Staff Memorandum will also be
available on the Commission’s Web site
at https://www.ferc.gov.
DATES: Comments on the Staff
Memorandum should be filed by
November 29, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The Commission
encourages electronic submission of
comments in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original of the
comment to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
NE., Washington, DC 20426.
All filings in this docket are
accessible on-line at https://
www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket. For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christy Walsh, Office of the General
Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, 202–502–6523,
Christy.Walsh@ferc.gov.
Dated: October 18, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–26439 Filed 10–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0781; FRL–9746–7]
Determination of Attainment for the
Yuba City-Marysville Nonattainment
Area for the 2006 Fine Particle
Standard; California; Determination
Regarding Applicability of Clean Air
Act Requirements
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to
determine that the Yuba City-Marysville
nonattainment area in California has
attained the 2006 24-hour fine particle
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS). This proposed
determination is based upon complete,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:18 Oct 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
quality-assured, and certified ambient
air monitoring data showing that this
area has monitored attainment of the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS based on
the 2009–2011 monitoring period. EPA
is further proposing that, if EPA
finalizes this determination of
attainment, the requirements for this
area to submit an attainment
demonstration, together with reasonably
available control measures (RACM), a
reasonable further progress (RFP) plan,
and contingency measures for failure to
meet RFP and attainment deadlines
shall be suspended for so long as the
area continues to attain the 2006 24hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before November 29,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2012–0781 by one of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal, at
www.regulations.gov, please follow the
on-line instructions;
2. Email to ungvarsky.john@epa.gov;
or
3. Mail or delivery to John Ungvarsky,
Air Planning Office, AIR–2, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, California 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted
through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Ungvarsky, (415) 972–3963, or by email
at ungvarsky.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, wherever
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used, we mean
EPA. We are providing the following
outline to aid in locating information in
this proposal.
Table of Contents
I. What determination is EPA making?
II. What is the background for this action?
A. PM2.5 NAAQS
B. Designation of PM2.5 Nonattainment
Areas
C. How does EPA make attainment
determinations?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the relevant air
quality data?
A. Monitoring Network and Data
Considerations
B. Evaluation of Current Attainment
IV. How does EPA’s Clean Data Policy apply
to this action?
A. Application of EPA’s Clean Data Policy
to the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS
B. History and Basis of EPA’s Clean Data
Policy
V. EPA’s Proposed Action and Request for
Public Comment
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What determination is EPA making?
EPA is proposing to determine that
the Yuba City-Marysville nonattainment
area has clean data for the 2006 24-hour
NAAQS for fine particles (generally
referring to particles less than or equal
to 2.5 micrometers in diameter, PM2.5).
This determination is based upon
complete, quality-assured, and certified
ambient air monitoring data showing
the area has monitored attainment of the
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS based on 2009–2011
monitoring data. Preliminary data in
EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS) for
2012 indicate that the area continues to
attain the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. Based on
this determination, we are also
proposing to suspend the obligations on
the State of California to submit certain
state implementation plan (SIP)
revisions related to attainment of this
standard for the Yuba City-Marysville
E:\FR\FM\30OCP1.SGM
30OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 30, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65645-65646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26439]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
18 CFR Chapter I
[Docket No. AD12-6-000]
Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules: Notice of Staff
Memorandum
SUMMARY: Take notice that the Commission staff is issuing a memorandum
setting forth certain minor revisions to the Commission's Natural Gas
Pipeline regulations that may be appropriate to remove reporting
requirements that may no longer serve their intended purpose. The
memorandum was issued pursuant to the Nov. 8, 2011 Plan for
Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules prepared in response to
Executive Order 13579, which requested independent regulatory agencies
issue plans for periodic retrospective analysis of their existing
regulations.
[[Page 65646]]
The Staff Memorandum is being placed in the record in the above-
referenced administrative docket. The Staff Memorandum will also be
available on the Commission's Web site at https://www.ferc.gov.
DATES: Comments on the Staff Memorandum should be filed by November 29,
2012.
ADDRESSES: The Commission encourages electronic submission of comments
in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original of the
comment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
NE., Washington, DC 20426.
All filings in this docket are accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ``eLibrary'' link. There is an
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed
docket. For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christy Walsh, Office of the General
Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, 202-502-6523, Christy.Walsh@ferc.gov.
Dated: October 18, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-26439 Filed 10-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P