Repeal of Regulations on Marriages, 65477-65478 [2012-26554]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
65477
Regulatory Flexibility Act
It is hereby certified that the repeal of
these regulations will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), because
the issues addressed are not of an
economic nature. In addition, the repeal
of this regulation does not have
federalism implications under E.O.
13132.
§§ 388.108 or 388.113 of this chapter. By
treating the documents as nonpublic,
the Commission is not making a
determination on any claim of privilege
or CEII status. The Commission retains
the right to make determinations with
regard to any claim of privilege or CEII
status, and the discretion to release
information as necessary to carry out its
jurisdictional responsibilities.
(ii) The request for privileged or CEII
treatment and the public version of the
document will be made available while
the request is pending.
(2) For documents submitted to
Commission staff. The notification
procedures of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f)
of this section will be followed before
making a document public.
(d) Notification of request and
opportunity to comment. When a FOIA
or CEII requester seeks a document for
which privilege or CEII status has been
claimed, or when the Commission itself
is considering release of such
information, the Commission official
who will decide whether to release the
information or any other appropriate
Commission official will notify the
person who submitted the document
and give the person an opportunity (at
least five calendar days) in which to
comment in writing on the request. A
copy of this notice will be sent to the
requester.
(e) Notification before release. Notice
of a decision by the Commission, the
Chairman of the Commission, the
Director, Office of External Affairs, the
General Counsel or General Counsel’s
designee, a presiding officer in a
proceeding under part 385 of this
chapter, or any other appropriate official
to deny a claim of privilege, in whole
or in part, or to make a limited release
of CEII, will be given to any person
claiming that the information is
privileged or CEII no less than 5
calendar days before disclosure. The
notice will briefly explain why the
person’s objections to disclosure are not
sustained by the Commission. A copy of
this notice will be sent to the FOIA or
CEII requester.
(f) Notification of suit in Federal
courts. When a FOIA requester brings
suit to compel disclosure of information
for which a person has claimed
privileged treatment, the Commission
will notify the person who submitted
the documents of the suit.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Administrative Procedure Act
Federalism
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the rule
have federalism implications warranting
the application of Executive Orders No.
12372 and No. 13132.
§ 388.113
This action is being taken as a final
rule pursuant to the ‘‘good cause’’
provision of 5 U.S.C. 553(b). It is the
position of the Department that notice
and comment are not necessary in light
of the fact that Part 52 is obsolete or
duplicative of other authorities.
Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed the
regulations in light of sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
[Amended]
27. In § 388.113(d)(1) and (d)(2),
remove the phrase ‘‘paragraph (d)(3)’’
and add the phrase ‘‘paragraph (d)(4)’’
in its place.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with
■
[FR Doc. 2012–26126 Filed 10–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:17 Oct 26, 2012
Jkt 229001
22 CFR Part 52
[Public Notice 8074]
RIN 1400–AD27
Repeal of Regulations on Marriages
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with Executive
Order 13563, the Bureau of Consular
Affairs is repealing the regulations on
marriages. The current regulations are
outdated and duplicative of other
authorities that detail procedures for
authentications and documentation of
life events. Further, in light of other
authorities, it is unnecessary to
specifically state in the regulations how
consular authority is limited.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective October 29, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dara
Morenoff, Office of Legal Affairs,
Overseas Citizen Services, U.S.
Department of State, 2201 C Street NW.,
SA–29, Washington, DC 20520, (202)
736–4995, morenoffdj@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
removes Part 52 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, which relates to the
consular role in marriages. The
Department is removing Part 52 because
it is outdated and duplicative of other
federal laws and regulations. For
example:
—Section 52.1 provides that consular
officers may not conduct marriages or
serve as witnesses to a marriage. The
law authorizing consular officers to
act in this capacity, 22 U.S.C. 4192,
was repealed in 1990.
—Section 52.2 relates to authentication
of marriage documents. This section
is unnecessary because the laws and
regulations that apply to
authentications in general also apply
to marriage documents, and these
functions are already covered in 22
CFR 92.41.
—Finally, Section 52.3 is unnecessary
because there is no longer demand for
official certificates with respect to
marriage laws in foreign countries.
SUMMARY:
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532, generally requires agencies to
prepare a statement before proposing
any rule that may result in an annual
expenditure of $100 million or more by
State, local, or tribal governments, or by
the private sector. This rule will not
result in any such expenditure, nor will
it significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Department of State has reviewed
this rule to ensure its consistency with
the regulatory philosophy and
principles set forth in Executive Order
12866 and has determined that the
benefits of this regulation justify its
costs. The Department does not consider
this rule to be an economically
significant action within the scope of
section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order
since it is not likely to have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or to adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local or tribal governments or
communities. The Department has
considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563, dated January
18, 2011, and affirms that this regulation
is consistent with the guidance therein.
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
29OCR1
65478
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Consultations With Tribal Governments
The Department has determined that
this rulemaking will not have Tribal
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian Tribal governments, and will not
pre-empt Tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175
do not apply to this rulemaking.
This rule does not impose information
collection requirements under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 52
Authentication of marriage, Marriage
and divorce, Marriage laws.
■ Accordingly, under the authority of 22
U.S.C. 2651a, and because the statutory
authority for Part 52 has been repealed,
22 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter F is
amended by removing Part 52.
Dated: October 2, 2012.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Consular
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012–26554 Filed 10–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0228]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, and
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel,
Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a segment of the Safety Zone; Brandon
Road Lock and Dam to Lake Michigan
including Des Plaines River, Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago River,
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel on all
waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal from Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile
Marker 296.7 at various times on
November 14, 2012. This action is
necessary to protect the waterways,
waterway users, and vessels from
hazards associated with the Illinois
Department of Natural Resources netting
and electro-fishing clearing operation.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
12:17 Oct 26, 2012
The regulations in 33 CFR
165.930 will be enforced from 7:00 a.m.
to 11:00 a.m. and from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00
p.m. on November 14, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or email MST1 Joseph McCollum,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, telephone 414–
747–7148, email address
Joseph.p.Mccollum@uscg.mil.
DATES:
Paperwork Reduction Act
VerDate Mar<15>2010
During any of the below listed
enforcement periods, entry into,
transiting, mooring, laying-up or
anchoring within the enforced area of
this safety zone by any person or vessel
is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her designated
representative.
Jkt 229001
The Coast
Guard will enforce a segment of the
Safety Zone; Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, CalumetSaganashkee Channel, Chicago, IL,
listed in 33 CFR 165.930. Specifically,
the Coast Guard will enforce this safety
zone between Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile
Marker 296.7 on all waters of the
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal.
Enforcement will occur from 7:00 a.m.
until 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. until 5:00
p.m. on November 14, 2012.
This enforcement action is necessary
because the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan has determined that the
Illinois Department of Natural
Resources netting and electro-fishing
clearing operation poses risks to life and
property. The passage of vessel traffic
during the same time as the Operation
makes the controlling of vessels through
the impacted portion of the Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal necessary to
prevent injury and property loss.
In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into, transiting, mooring, laying up or
anchoring within the enforced area of
this safety zone by any person or vessel
is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her designated
representative.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.930 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
In addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, will also provide notice
through other means, which may
include, but are not limited to,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local
Notice to Mariners, local news media,
distribution in leaflet form, and onscene oral notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Additionally, the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, may notify
representatives from the maritime
industry through telephonic and email
notifications.
Dated: October 11, 2012.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2012–26489 Filed 10–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0805; EPA–R05–
OAR–2012–0567; FRL–9742–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois;
Indiana; Michigan; Minnesota; Ohio;
Wisconsin; Infrastructure SIP
Requirements for the 2006 PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards; Indiana NSR/PSD
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking final action to
approve most elements, and disapprove
narrow portions of other elements, of
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submissions by Illinois, Indiana,
Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and
Wisconsin regarding the infrastructure
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
for the 2006 24-hour fine particle
national ambient air quality standards
(2006 PM2.5 NAAQS). The infrastructure
requirements are designed to ensure that
the structural components of each
State’s air quality management program
are adequate to meet the State’s
responsibilities under the CAA. EPA is
also taking final action to approve
portions of a submission from Indiana
addressing EPA’s requirements for its
new source review (NSR) and
prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD) program. The proposed
rulemaking was published on August 2,
2012. During the comment period,
which ended on September 4, 2012,
EPA received five comment letters. The
concerns raised in these letters, as well
as EPA’s responses, will be addressed in
this final action.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
November 28, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established two
dockets for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0805
(infrastructure SIP elements for all
Region 5 States) and EPA–R05–OAR–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
29OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 209 (Monday, October 29, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65477-65478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26554]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 52
[Public Notice 8074]
RIN 1400-AD27
Repeal of Regulations on Marriages
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with Executive Order 13563, the Bureau of
Consular Affairs is repealing the regulations on marriages. The current
regulations are outdated and duplicative of other authorities that
detail procedures for authentications and documentation of life events.
Further, in light of other authorities, it is unnecessary to
specifically state in the regulations how consular authority is
limited.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective October 29, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dara Morenoff, Office of Legal
Affairs, Overseas Citizen Services, U.S. Department of State, 2201 C
Street NW., SA-29, Washington, DC 20520, (202) 736-4995,
morenoffdj@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule removes Part 52 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, which relates to the consular role in marriages.
The Department is removing Part 52 because it is outdated and
duplicative of other federal laws and regulations. For example:
--Section 52.1 provides that consular officers may not conduct
marriages or serve as witnesses to a marriage. The law authorizing
consular officers to act in this capacity, 22 U.S.C. 4192, was repealed
in 1990.
--Section 52.2 relates to authentication of marriage documents. This
section is unnecessary because the laws and regulations that apply to
authentications in general also apply to marriage documents, and these
functions are already covered in 22 CFR 92.41.
--Finally, Section 52.3 is unnecessary because there is no longer
demand for official certificates with respect to marriage laws in
foreign countries.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
This action is being taken as a final rule pursuant to the ``good
cause'' provision of 5 U.S.C. 553(b). It is the position of the
Department that notice and comment are not necessary in light of the
fact that Part 52 is obsolete or duplicative of other authorities.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
It is hereby certified that the repeal of these regulations will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), because the issues addressed are not of an economic nature. In
addition, the repeal of this regulation does not have federalism
implications under E.O. 13132.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532, generally requires agencies to prepare a statement before
proposing any rule that may result in an annual expenditure of $100
million or more by State, local, or tribal governments, or by the
private sector. This rule will not result in any such expenditure, nor
will it significantly or uniquely affect small governments.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Department of State has reviewed this rule to ensure its
consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in
Executive Order 12866 and has determined that the benefits of this
regulation justify its costs. The Department does not consider this
rule to be an economically significant action within the scope of
section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order since it is not likely to have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or to adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State,
local or tribal governments or communities. The Department has
considered this rule in light of Executive Order 13563, dated January
18, 2011, and affirms that this regulation is consistent with the
guidance therein.
Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor will the rule have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders No. 12372
and No. 13132.
Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed the regulations in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
[[Page 65478]]
Consultations With Tribal Governments
The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have
Tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian Tribal governments, and will not pre-empt Tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose information collection requirements under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 52
Authentication of marriage, Marriage and divorce, Marriage laws.
0
Accordingly, under the authority of 22 U.S.C. 2651a, and because the
statutory authority for Part 52 has been repealed, 22 CFR Chapter I,
Subchapter F is amended by removing Part 52.
Dated: October 2, 2012.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-26554 Filed 10-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P