Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; National Estuarine Research Reserve System Science Collaborative Evaluation, 65533-65534 [2012-26465]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2012 / Notices
Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3874.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with
Background
On April 10, 2012, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published
in the Federal Register a notice of
‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review’’ of the antidumping duty order
on solid fertilizer grade ammonium
nitrate (ammonium nitrate) from the
Russian Federation (Russia) for the
period of review (POR) of May 2, 2011,
through March 31, 2012.1 The
Department received timely-filed
requests from JSC Acron (Acron) and
MCC EuroChem (EuroChem) (the
respondents) in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), for an administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on
ammonium nitrate from Russia. On May
29, 2012, the Department published a
notice of initiation of an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on ammonium nitrate from Russia for
Acron and EuroChem.2 On the same
date, we: (1) Issued the antidumping
questionnaire to these companies; and
(2) requested information from U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on
imports of subject merchandise from
these respondents during the POR, in
accordance with our practice. In June
2012, we received the requested CBP
information, which showed that neither
Acron nor EuroChem had entries of
subject merchandise during the POR.
On June 5, 2012, we placed a
memorandum on the administrative
record of this case stating that our
review of the CBP database showed no
POR entries of subject merchandise by
the respondents.3 We released the
results of our CBP data query to the
respondents and CF Industries, Inc. and
El Dorado Chemical Company
(collectively, the petitioners). We
received no comments on the CBP data.
On June 20, 2012, Acron submitted its
response to section A of the
Department’s antidumping
questionnaire, which indicated that
1 See Ammonium Nitrate from Russia: Correction
to Notice of Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review, 77 FR 21527 (Apr. 10, 2012).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Requests for Revocation in Part, 77 FR 31586, 31570
(May 29, 2012).
3 See the June 5, 2012, memorandum from
Elizabeth Eastwood, Senior Analyst, to the file,
entitled, ‘‘2011–2012 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Solid Fertilizer Grade
Ammonium Nitrate (Ammonium Nitrate) from the
Russian Federation (Russia): Data Query Request.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:18 Oct 26, 2012
Jkt 229001
Acron had a shipment of subject
merchandise to the United States in
March 2012; however, the entry
documentation submitted with this
response showed that the entry
associated with this shipment was not
made until after the end of the POR. See
Acron’s June 20, 2012, response at
Exhibits 1 and 19.
On June 22, 2012, EuroChem
submitted a partial response to section
A of the Department’s antidumping duty
questionnaire, which stated that
EuroChem also had a shipment of
subject merchandise to the United
States in March 2012. Unlike Acron,
however, EuroChem provided a CBP
7501 form indicating that the entry
associated with this shipment occurred
on March 26, 2012. See EuroChem’s
June 22, 2012, submission at Exhibit 2.
Because this information was not
consistent with the underlying CBP
data, on June 25, 2012, we queried the
CBP database as to the status of the
particular entry in question. According
to the CBP database, although
EuroChem submitted its entry
documentation on March 26, 2012, the
entry was not accepted by CBP as
entered until after the end of the POR.
Because neither respondent had an
entry of subject merchandise into the
United States during the POR, on June
28, 2012, the Department placed a
memorandum on the record notifying
interested parties of its intent to rescind
this administrative review.4 We invited
parties to comment on our Intent to
Rescind Memo. On July 9, 2012, we
received comments from the
respondents, and on July 16, 2012, we
received rebuttal comments from the
petitioners.
On August 24, 2012, we placed a
memorandum on the record regarding
EuroChem’s entry date, to which
EuroChem responded on September 4,
2012.
Rescission of Review
It is the Department’s practice to
rescind an administrative review
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) when
there are no reviewable entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
subject to the antidumping duty order
and for which liquidation is
suspended.5 At the end of the
4 See the June 28, 2012, memorandum from Holly
Phelps, Analyst, to James Maeder, Director, Office
2, entitled, ‘‘Intent to Rescind Administrative
Review: 2011–2012 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Solid Fertilizer Grade
Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation’’
(Intent to Rescind Memo).
5 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From Brazil: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 32498 (June 1,
2012); and Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65533
administrative review, the suspended
entries are liquidated at the assessment
rate computed for the review period.
See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(l). Therefore, for
an administrative review to be
conducted, there must be a reviewable,
suspended entry to be liquidated at the
newly calculated assessment rate. As
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum (Decision Memo)
accompanying this notice, we find that
neither respondent made entries of
subject merchandise during the POR.
Therefore, we are rescinding this review
of the antidumping duty order on
ammonium nitrate from Russia pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in by parties to this
administrative review in their
comments are addressed in the Decision
Memo, which is adopted by this notice.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum, which is on file
electronically via IA ACCESS in the
Central Records Unit, room 7046, of the
main Department of Commerce
building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/.
The paper copy and electronic version
of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: October 22, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–26531 Filed 10–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; National Estuarine
Research Reserve System Science
Collaborative Evaluation
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
From Turkey; Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 67 FR 21634, 21635
(May 1, 2002), unchanged in Certain Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bars From Turkey; Final Results and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 67 FR 66110 (Oct. 30, 2002).
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
65534
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2012 / Notices
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before December 31,
2012 December 28, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Sarah Brabson, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Dwight Trueblood, (603)
862–3580 or
Dwight.Trueblood@noaa.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with
I. Abstract
The National Estuarine Research
Reserve System (NERRS) Science
Collaborative was created in 2009 to put
Reserve-based science to work for
coastal communities coping with the
impacts of land use change, pollution,
and habitat degradation in the context of
a changing climate. The program
operates on the belief that for science to
be applied to solve coastal management
problems, the people who need to use
the science must be involved in its
generation.
The projects funded by the NERRS
Science Collaborative are designed to
bring the intended users of the science
into the research process so that their
perspectives can inform problem
definition, research design and
implementation, and ultimately,
application of the project results. This is
what is meant by ‘‘collaboration,’’ and it
is the program’s goal to use this process
to ensure that the good science
happening in and around the Reserves
gets put to good use.
To help evaluate the efficacy of the
NERRS Science Collaborative, NOAA is
conducting a survey of the NERRS staff
located in the 28 Reserves around the
country to solicit their perspective about
the program and how it has been
implemented.
II. Method of Collection
13:18 Oct 26, 2012
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(request for a new information
collection).
Affected Public: Non-profit
institutions; State, local, or tribal
government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
140.
Estimated Time per Response: 20
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 47.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0 in recordkeeping/reporting
costs.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: October 23, 2012.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–26465 Filed 10–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[0648–XC242]
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted
Fishing Permit
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
Respondents will be surveyed
electronically and the submission of
results will be online. If requested, a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
paper copy of the survey will be
provided to the survey respondents.
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice; request for comments.
The Assistant Regional
Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries,
Northeast Region, NMFS, has made a
preliminary determination that the
subject exempted fishing permit (EFP)
application contains all the required
information and warrants further
consideration. The subject EFP would
allow a commercial fishing vessel to
conduct fishing operations that are
otherwise restricted by the regulations
governing the fisheries of the
Northeastern United States. Regulations
under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
require publication of this notification
to provide interested parties the
opportunity to comment on applications
for proposed EFPs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 13, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments by any of the following
methods:
• Email: nero.efp@noaa.gov. Include
in the subject line ‘‘Comments on
REDNET EFP.’’
• Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, NE Regional
Office, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside
of the envelope ‘‘Comments on REDNET
EFP.’’
• Fax: (978) 281–9135.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Alger, Fisheries Management
Specialist, 978–675–2153,
Brett.Alger@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
School for Marine Science and
Technology, University of
Massachusetts, Dartmouth (SMAST),
submitted a complete EFP application
on September 5, 2012, to conduct a
redfish trawl codend selectivity
experiment. This is the third of six
components for ‘‘REDNET: A Network
to Redevelop a Sustainable Redfish
(Sebastes fasciatus) Trawl Fishery in the
Gulf of Maine’’, which is funded by the
Northeast Fisheries Science Center’s
(NEFSC) Cooperative Research Program.
The overall objective of REDNET is to
develop gear type(s), seasons, and/or
area combinations to efficiently harvest
the redfish resource in the Gulf of Maine
(GOM) to maximize the long-term
benefits while minimizing negative
impacts, thereby providing a means to
achieve the annual catch limit (ACL) for
a rebuilt, but largely inaccessible,
redfish resource. The REDNET project
includes the following components: (1)
Network development; (2) baseline
catch and bycatch evaluation; (3)
codend selectivity; (4) conservation
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 209 (Monday, October 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65533-65534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26465]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; National
Estuarine Research Reserve System Science Collaborative Evaluation
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 65534]]
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before December 31,
2012 December 28, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Sarah Brabson, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to Dwight Trueblood, (603) 862-3580 or
Dwight.Trueblood@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) Science
Collaborative was created in 2009 to put Reserve-based science to work
for coastal communities coping with the impacts of land use change,
pollution, and habitat degradation in the context of a changing
climate. The program operates on the belief that for science to be
applied to solve coastal management problems, the people who need to
use the science must be involved in its generation.
The projects funded by the NERRS Science Collaborative are designed
to bring the intended users of the science into the research process so
that their perspectives can inform problem definition, research design
and implementation, and ultimately, application of the project results.
This is what is meant by ``collaboration,'' and it is the program's
goal to use this process to ensure that the good science happening in
and around the Reserves gets put to good use.
To help evaluate the efficacy of the NERRS Science Collaborative,
NOAA is conducting a survey of the NERRS staff located in the 28
Reserves around the country to solicit their perspective about the
program and how it has been implemented.
II. Method of Collection
Respondents will be surveyed electronically and the submission of
results will be online. If requested, a paper copy of the survey will
be provided to the survey respondents.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission (request for a new information
collection).
Affected Public: Non-profit institutions; State, local, or tribal
government.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 140.
Estimated Time per Response: 20 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 47.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0 in recordkeeping/
reporting costs.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: October 23, 2012.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-26465 Filed 10-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-P